-
International Journal of Medical... 2021Multiple myeloma (MM) is incurable in spite of recent treatment improvements, highlighting the development of new therapies. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Multiple myeloma (MM) is incurable in spite of recent treatment improvements, highlighting the development of new therapies. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has dramatically changed the therapeutic effectiveness in high-risk B-cell malignancies. For relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), preclinical evaluations of CAR-T therapy have shown promising efficacy, thus various active clinical trials are under way. Herein, we conducted this review to summarize efficacy and safety of CAR-T therapy and provide more evidence to guide clinical treatments. We systematically searched literature based on databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and conference abstracts reported from American Society of Hematology (ASH), European Hematology Association (EHA) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), in addition to other sources (www.clinicaltrials.gov, article citations). Data assessed efficacy and safety of CAR-T therapy in patients with RRMM were extracted and evaluated, and then systematically analyzed by Comprehensive Meta-analysis 3.0 (CMA 3.0). A total of 23 studies including 350 participants from different countries, diagnosed as RRMM and treated with CAR-T therapy (containing 7 antigens targeted by CARs) were combined. In summary, we discovered the pooled overall response rate (77%), complete response rate (37%) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate within responders (78%). Furthermore, the pooled relapse rate of responders was 38% and median progression-free survival was 8 months. The pooled survival rate was 87% at last follow-up (median, 12 months). In addition, the pooled grade 3-4 rates of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic toxicities (NT) were 14% and 13%, respectively. Our study suggests that CAR-T therapy has demonstrated efficacy and safety in RRMM patients. BCMA-targeted CAR-T and anti-BCMA contained regimen have shown better efficacy.
Topics: B-Cell Maturation Antigen; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Progression-Free Survival; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
PubMed: 33746596
DOI: 10.7150/ijms.46811 -
Cancers Jan 2022To systematically review the current body of evidence on the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for cervical cancer (CC). (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To systematically review the current body of evidence on the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy for cervical cancer (CC).
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science were searched for prospective trials assessing immunotherapy in CC patients in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Full-text articles in English and German reporting outcomes of survival, response rates or safety were eligible.
RESULTS
Of 4655 screened studies, 51 were included (immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) =20; therapeutic vaccines = 25; adoptive cell transfer therapy =9). Of these, one qualified as a phase III randomized controlled trial and demonstrated increased overall survival following treatment with pembrolizumab, chemotherapy and bevacizumab. A minority of studies included a control group ( = 7) or more than 50 patients ( = 15). Overall, response rates were low to moderate. No response to ICIs was seen in PD-L1 negative patients. However, few remarkable results were achieved in heavily pretreated patients. There were no safety concerns in any of the included studies.
CONCLUSION
Strong evidence on the efficacy of strategies to treat recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer is currently limited to pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy and bevacizumab, which substantiates an urgent need for large confirmatory trials on alternative immunotherapies. Overall, there is sound evidence on the safety of immunotherapy in CC.
PubMed: 35053603
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14020441 -
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics 2022To explore the differential efficacy of chemoradiotherapy combined with adoptive immunotherapy and radiochemotherapy alone in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer...
The Combined Clinical Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Adoptive Immunotherapy with Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To explore the differential efficacy of chemoradiotherapy combined with adoptive immunotherapy and radiochemotherapy alone in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS
Qualified randomized controlled trial (randomized controlled trial, RCT), or nonrandomized concurrent controlled trial (NRCCT), published in various databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Chinese journal full-text database, Medline, Cochrane database, and VIP Chinese database, and the Revman5. 0 software performed the data analysis.
RESULTS
We found the significantly different curative effect between the experimental and control groups (OR = 1.94, 95% CI (1.46, 2.58), < 0.001, = 0%, = 4.59), effect of adoptive immunotherapy on the progression of disease (OR = 1.80, 95% CI (1.38, 2.35), < 0.001, = 0%, = 4.33), adoptive immunotherapy on overall survival (OR = 2.19, 95% CI (1.60, 2.99), < 0.001, = 0%, = 4.91), and adverse effects of adoptive immunotherapy (OR = 1.76, 95% CI (1.25, 2.48), = 0.001, = 0%, = 3.26).
CONCLUSION
Adoptive immunotherapy combined with microradiotherapy can decrease the recurrence of NSCLC and improve patient survival, as well as early patients can be benefited more significantly from immunotherapy.
PubMed: 35706510
DOI: 10.1155/2022/2731744 -
Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia Apr 2021Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) typically responds better when treated with multiagent chemotherapy in the pediatric and young adolescent populations. Treatment of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of CD19-Specific CAR-T Cell Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the Pediatric and Young Adult Population: Safety and Efficacy Outcomes.
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) typically responds better when treated with multiagent chemotherapy in the pediatric and young adolescent populations. Treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) ALL remains a challenge. Even after stem-cell transplantation and intensive chemotherapy, the prognosis of RR-ALL remains grave. The advent of chimeric antigen receptors has demonstrated promising results in RR-ALL. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells (CAR-T) and engineered T cells are used to target cancer cells. In 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration approved CD19-specific CAR-T (tisagenlecleucel) therapy for RR-B-cell ALL in patients under 25 years old. In this systematic review, we discuss the efficacy and safety of CD19-specific CAR-T therapy in RR-B-cell ALL in the pediatric and young adult population. We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and clinical trials databases. A total of 448 patients received a CD19-specific CAR-T product, and 446 patients had evaluable data. The age range was 0 to 30 years. The incidence rate of complete remission was 82%. The cumulative incidence of relapse after CD19-specific CAR-T therapy is 36%. Similarly, the incidence rate of grade 3 or higher adverse events of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, neurotoxicity, infections, and cytokine release syndrome were 38%, 23%, 18%, 29%, and 19%, respectively. Our subgroup analysis shows the incidence rate of minimal residual negative complete remission was 69% with the CD28z costimulatory domain, 81% with the 4-1BB domain, and 77% with fourth-generation CD19-specific CAR-T therapy.
Topics: Adolescent; Antigens, CD19; Child; Cytokine Release Syndrome; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Neutropenia; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Progression-Free Survival; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Remission Induction; Thrombocytopenia; Young Adult
PubMed: 33573914
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.12.010 -
Oncotarget Dec 2017Although adoptive immunotherapy (AIT) is a novel emerging target treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its actual efficacy remains controversial. In this...
Although adoptive immunotherapy (AIT) is a novel emerging target treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its actual efficacy remains controversial. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of AIT for NSCLC. We systematically searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, and Web of Science for relevant parallel randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and high-quality observation studies of AIT without any language restrictions. Two investigators reviewed all the texts and extracted information regarding overall survival rate (OS), progression-free survival rate (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) from eligible studies; sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were also conducted to reduce heterogeneity Of 319 suitable studies, 15 studies (13 RCTs and 2 observation studies) involving 1684 patients were finally included. Compared to the Control therapy (CT) group, the AIT group exhibited better 1-year OS ( = 0.001), 2-year OS ( < 0.001), 3-year OS ( < 0.001), 5-year OS ( = 0.032), 1-year PFS ( < 0.001), and 2-year PFS ( = 0.029). The difference in the ORR ( = 0.293) and DCR ( = 0.123) was not significant between the groups. The subgroup analysis showed that DC/CIK did more benefit to NSCLC patients than LAK and the cycles not associated with AIT efficacy. AIT can significantly improve the OS and PFS with acceptable toxicity for NSCLC. Nevertheless, further multicenter studies are needed to confirm our conclusion and determine which adoptive immunotherapy is associated with the greatest efficacy.
PubMed: 29348890
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19373 -
Transfusion Medicine Reviews Apr 2019Promising efficacy results of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy have been tempered by safety considerations. Our objective was to comprehensively summarize... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Promising efficacy results of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy have been tempered by safety considerations. Our objective was to comprehensively summarize the efficacy and safety of CAR-T cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory hematologic or solid malignancies. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (inception - November 21, 2017). Interventional studies investigating CAR-T cell therapy in patients with malignancies were included. Our primary outcome of interest was complete response (defined as the absence of detectable cancer). Two independent reviewers extracted relevant data, assessed risk of bias, and graded the quality of evidence using established methods. A total of 42 hematological malignancy studies and 18 solid tumor studies met were included (913 participants). Of 486 evaluable hematologic patients, 54.4% [95% CI, 42.5%-65.9%] experienced complete response in 27 CD19 CAR-T cell therapy studies. Of 65 evaluable hematologic patients, 24.4% [95% CI, 9.4%-50.3%] experienced complete response in seven non-CD19 CAR-T cell therapy studies. Cytokine release syndrome was experienced by 55.3% [95% CI, 40.3%-69.4%] of patients and neurotoxicity 37.2% [95% CI, 28.6%-46.8%] of patients with hematologic malignancies. Of 86 evaluable solid tumor patients, 4.1% [95% CI, 1.6%-10.6%] experienced complete response in eight CAR-T cell therapy studies. Limitations include heterogeneity of study populations, as well as high risk of bias of included studies. There was a strong signal for efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy in patients with CD19+ hematologic malignancies and no overall signal in solid tumor trials published to date. These results will help inform patients, physicians, and other stakeholders of the benefits and risks associated with CAR-T cell therapy.
Topics: Antigens, CD19; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Immunotherapy; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Risk Assessment; T-Lymphocytes; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30948292
DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2019.01.005 -
Blood Advances Jan 2023Relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL) are associated with short survival and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Relapsed/refractory primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) and secondary central nervous system lymphoma (SCNSL) are associated with short survival and represent an unmet need, requiring novel effective strategies. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, effective in systemic large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), have shown responses in PCNSL and SCNSL in early reports, but with limited sample size. We, therefore, performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of all published data describing CAR T-cell use in PCNSL and SCNSL. This identified 128 patients with PCNSL (30) and SCNSL (98). Our primary objectives were to evaluate CAR T-cell specific toxicity (immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome [ICANS] and cytokine release syndrome [CRS]) as well as response rates in these 2 populations. Seventy percent of patients with PCNSL had CRS of any grade (13% grade 3-4) and 53% had ICANS of any grade (18% grade 3-4). Comparatively, 72% of the SCNSL cohort experienced CRS of any grade (11% grade 3-4) and 48% had ICANS of any grade (26% grade 3-4). Of the patients with PCNSL, 56% achieved a complete remission (CR) with 37% remaining in remission at 6 months. Similarly, 47% of patients with SCNSL had a CR, with 37% in remission at 6 months. In a large meta-analysis of central nervous system (CNS) lymphomas, toxicity of anti-CD19-CAR T-cell therapy was similar to that of registrational studies in systemic LBCL with no increased signal of neurotoxicity observed. Encouraging efficacy was demonstrated in patients with CNS lymphoma with no discernible differences between PCNSL and SCNSL.
Topics: Humans; Antigens, CD19; Central Nervous System Neoplasms; Cytokine Release Syndrome; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Neoplasms, Second Primary; Neurotoxicity Syndromes
PubMed: 36260735
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2022008525 -
Leukemia & Lymphoma Feb 2013There remain some key questions regarding the adoptive infusion of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) transduced T-cells in the clinical setting. This article... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
There remain some key questions regarding the adoptive infusion of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) transduced T-cells in the clinical setting. This article systematically reviews the phase I clinical trials using CARs targeting CD19 in B-lineage malignancies. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled and the 6-month progression free survival for this cohort was 50.0 ± 9.9%. Univariate analysis showed that patients benefited from lymphodepletion before CAR+T-cell infusion and the administration of interleukin-2 (IL-2). Longer-term persistence (≥ 4 weeks) and stronger expansion of CAR+ T-cells in the blood and higher peak serum interferon-γ (IFN-γ) level (≥ 200 pg/mL) were also related to superior outcome. Regarding treatment-related adverse events, the most prominent toxicities were fever, rigors, chills, acute renal failure, hypotension and capillary leak syndrome. In conclusion, anti-CD19 CAR+ T-cells have shown some benefits in patients with B-lineage malignancies and are well tolerated in most patients. Preconditioning and cytokine supplement are required to improve the clinical outcome.
Topics: Antigens, CD19; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Leukemia, B-Cell; Lymphoma, B-Cell; Prognosis; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell; T-Lymphocytes; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 22897728
DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2012.715350 -
Current Medicinal Chemistry 2019Adoptive infusion of chimeric antigen receptor transduced T- cells (CAR-T) is a powerful tool of immunotherapy for hematological malignancies, as evidenced by recently...
BACKGROUND
Adoptive infusion of chimeric antigen receptor transduced T- cells (CAR-T) is a powerful tool of immunotherapy for hematological malignancies, as evidenced by recently published and unpublished clinical results.
OBJECTIVE
In this report, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of CAR-T on refractory and/or relapsed B-cell malignancies, including leukemia and lymphoma.
METHODS
Clinical studies investigating efficacy and safety of CAR-T in acute and chronic lymphocytic leukemia and lymphoma were identified by searching PubMed and EMBASE. Outcomes of efficacy subjected to analysis were the rates of complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR). The safety parameters were the prevalence of adverse effects including fever, hypotension, and acute renal failure. Meta analyses were performed using R software. Weighted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals was calculated for each outcome. Fixed or random-effects models were employed depending on the heterogeneity across the included studies.
RESULTS
Nineteen published clinical studies with a total of 391 patients were included for the meta-analysis. The pooled rate of complete remission was 55% (95% CI 41%-69%); the pooled rate of partial remission was 25% (95% CI: 19%-33%). The prevalence of fever was 62% (95% CI: 41%-79%), the hypotension was 22% (95% CI: 15%-31%), and the acute renal failure was 24% (95% CI: 16%-34%). All adverse effects were manageable and no death was reported due to toxicity.
CONCLUSION
CD19-targeted CAR-T is an effective modality in treating refractory B-cell malignancies including leukemia and lymphoma. However, there is still a need to develop strategies to improve the safety in its clinical use.
Topics: Antigens, CD19; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma, B-Cell; Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell
PubMed: 28762313
DOI: 10.2174/0929867324666170801101842 -
International Journal of Clinical... Jan 2012The high risk of recurrence in post-operative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) highlights the need for an effective adjuvant treatment. A systematic review of randomised... (Review)
Review
The high risk of recurrence in post-operative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) highlights the need for an effective adjuvant treatment. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of adjuvant adoptive immunotherapy (AIT) for post-operative HCC patients. Electronic (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases) and manual searches were conducted throughout May 2011 to identify RCTs evaluating postoperative AIT for patients with HCC. Methodological quality was assessed in accordance with the QUOROM statement. Four RCTs totalling 423 patients met the eligibility criteria. All RCTs reported significantly improved disease-free survival rate or reduced recurrence rate after treating with adjuvant AIT (p < 0.05). The overall survival rates of AIT group are slightly higher than those of the control group in one study. Moreover, AIT was a safe treatment, with fever as the main adverse effects. This study adds to the evidence that postoperative HCC patients treated with adjuvant AIT show an improvement in disease-free survival rate or recurrence rate.
Topics: Adjuvants, Immunologic; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Liver Neoplasms; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Postoperative Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 22171902
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02814.x