-
Cytotherapy Aug 2018Dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy has recently been reported frequently in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, its efficacy remains... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AIMS
Dendritic cell (DC)-based immunotherapy has recently been reported frequently in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, its efficacy remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of DC-based immunotherapy on HCC by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science were searched to identify clinical trials on DC-based immunotherapy for HCC published up to January 31, 2018. The articles were selected according to pre-established inclusion criteria and methodologic quality, and publication bias were evaluated.
RESULTS
A total of 1276 cases from 19 clinical trials were included. Compared with traditional treatment, further DC-based therapy enhanced the CD4 T/CD8 T ratio (standardized mean difference: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.89, P < 0.001); increased the 1-year, 18-month and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and the 1-year, 18-month and 2-year overall survival (OS) rate (relative risk > 1, P < 0.05), prolonged the median PFS time (median survival ratio [MSR]: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.60-2.46, P < 0.001) and median OS time (MSR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.51-1.96, P < 0.001). Adverse reactions were mild.
CONCLUSIONS
DC-based therapy not only enhanced anti-tumor immunity, improved the survival rate and prolonged the survival time of HCC patients, but it was also safe. These findings will provide encouraging information for further development of DC-based immunotherapy as an adjuvant treatment for HCC. However, the results must be interpreted with caution because of the small study numbers, publication bias and the various of study designs, pre-treatment and therapeutic processes of DCs.
Topics: Adjuvants, Immunologic; Cancer Vaccines; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Combined Modality Therapy; Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells; Dendritic Cells; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Liver Neoplasms; Progression-Free Survival; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30072299
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2018.06.002 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Jan 2014To investigate whether autologous dendritic cell (DC)-cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cell therapy is able to improve the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapy in colon... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
To investigate whether autologous dendritic cell (DC)-cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cell therapy is able to improve the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapy in colon cancer.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of published papers from the sources of MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, the Wanfang Database, the China Science and Technology Periodical Database and China Journal Net. Published data were extracted independently by two authors using predefined database templates. The quality of the data from individual papers was also assessed. The effects of chemotherapy were compared with those of chemotherapy in combination with DC-CIK immunotherapy. The pooled analysis was performed using the data from random or fixed-effect models.
RESULTS
Seven trials matched our inclusion criteria (n = 533). The overall analysis showed significant survival benefit [one-year overall survival (OS), P < 0.0001; two-year OS, P = 0.009; three-year OS, P = 0.002] in favor of DC-CIK immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy. Disease-free survival (DFS) rate was improved after the combination of DC-CIK immunotherapy and chemotherapy (one-year DFS, P < 0.0001; two-year DFS, P = 0.002; three-year DFS, P = 0.02). An improved overall response rate (P = 0.009) was also observed in patients who received DC-CIK therapy. Furthermore, the analysis of T-lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood indicated that the number of CD4⁺ T cells significantly increased in the DC-CIK plus chemotherapy group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The combination of DC-CIK immunotherapy and chemotherapy was superior in prolonging the survival time and enhancing immunological responses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; China; Colonic Neoplasms; Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells; Dendritic Cells; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Survival Analysis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24574784
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i4.1095 -
Oncoimmunology Jan 2014γδ T cells contribute to the front line of lymphoid antitumor surveillance and bridge the gap between innate and adaptive immunity. They can be readily expanded to... (Review)
Review
γδ T cells contribute to the front line of lymphoid antitumor surveillance and bridge the gap between innate and adaptive immunity. They can be readily expanded to high numbers in vivo and in vitro, starting from the blood of cancer patients, and a number of Phase I trials have demonstrated that these cells can be employed in cancer immunotherapy. Sufficient patients have received γδ T cell-based immunotherapies in the context of clinical trials to evaluate their utility, and to inform the direction of new trials. A systematic approach was used to identify Phase I, Phase II, and feasibility studies testing γδ T cell-based immunotherapy in cancer patients. Studies were excluded from further analysis if they did not provide patient-specific data. Data were compiled to evaluate efficacy, with stratification by treatment approach. When possible, comparisons were made with the efficacy of second-line conventional therapeutic approaches for the same malignancy. Twelve eligible studies were identified, providing information on 157 patients who had received γδ T cell-based immunotherapy. The comparison of objective response data suggests that γδ T cell-based immunotherapy is superior to current second-line therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma and prostate cancer, but not for non-small cell lung carcinoma. An evaluation of pooled data from 132 published in vitro experiments shows a consistent improvement in the cytotoxicity of γδ T cells in the presence of antitumor antibodies. Immunotherapy using γδ T cells alone shows promising clinical activity, but there is a strong preclinical rationale for combining this treatment modality with cancer-targeting antibodies to augment its efficacy.
PubMed: 24734216
DOI: 10.4161/onci.27572 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Nov 2022Allogeneic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has the potential for extensive clinical applications. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Allogeneic anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has the potential for extensive clinical applications. This study aimed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in treating relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Four databases were searched for relevant studies. Among patients treated with donor-derived CAR T-cell therapy, ALL patients had a complete remission (CR) rate of 80 % and a 1-year overall survival rate of 51 %. The graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) rate was 4 %, cytokine release syndrome was 69 %, and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was 8 %. For off-the-shelf CAR T-cell therapy, the CR rate for ALL was 70 %, and for NHL, it was 52 %. The objective response rate for NHL was 72 %. The pooled GvHD of off-the-shelf CAR T-cell therapy for ALL and NHL combined was 0 %. Allogeneic anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy are effective and safe for treating R/R ALL and NHL. AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS: All datasets generated in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Material.
Topics: Antigens, CD19; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
PubMed: 36087853
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103807 -
Cytotherapy Oct 2019Although promising results have recently been reported using dendritic cells (DCs) and cytokine-induced killer cells (CIKs) to treat pancreatic cancer (PC), its clinical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Although promising results have recently been reported using dendritic cells (DCs) and cytokine-induced killer cells (CIKs) to treat pancreatic cancer (PC), its clinical effect and safety are associated with some controversy, and lack sufficient evidence. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis of 21 clinical trials to better evaluate the efficacy of DC-CIK immunotherapy in clinical practice to treat PC.
METHODS
PubMed, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform (WANFANG Data) were searched to identify clinical trials that used DC-CIK immunotherapy for PC. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0.
RESULTS
A total of 21 clinical trials involving 1549 patients were included. Compared with traditional treatment, DC-CIK immunotherapy improved and increased the clinical indices such as complete remission, partial remission, overall response rate, disease control rate, overall survival (0.5-y OS, 1-y OS, 1.5-y OS, 2-y OS and 3-y OS), interferon γ and CD3+, CD4+, CD4+/CD8+ and CD3+CD56+ lymphocyte. Additionally, DC-CIK immunotherapy reduced stable disease, progression disease, mortality, CD8+, CD4+CD25+CD127 low lymphocyte and interleukin-4. Furthermore, it showed a low incidence of adverse reactions (22%).
CONCLUSION
In contrast to traditional therapy, DC-CIK immunotherapy not only shows improved short-term effect, long-term effect and immunologic function, but also reduces mortality and negative immunoregulatory index, and shows mild adverse reactions. This is the first study to evaluate the clinical effect and safety of DC-CIK immunotherapy for PC, and it indicated that DC-CIK immunotherapy may be suitable for patients with advanced PC or intolerance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
Topics: Adult; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cytokine-Induced Killer Cells; Dendritic Cells; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31462394
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.07.006 -
Reviews in Medical Virology Jul 2024Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection poses significant risks in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients. Despite advances in antiviral... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Efficacy and safety of adoptive T-cell therapy in treating cytomegalovirus infections post-haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection poses significant risks in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients. Despite advances in antiviral therapies, issues such as drug resistance, side effects, and inadequate immune reconstitution remain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adoptive cell therapy (ATC) in managing CMV infections in allo-HSCT recipients. Adhering to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive database search through July 2023. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on studies involving HSCT patients with CMV infections treated with ATC. The primary outcome was the response rate to ATC, and secondary outcomes included adverse events associated with ATC. The Freeman-Tukey transformation was applied for analysis. In the meta-analysis of 40 studies involving 953 participants, ATC achieved an overall integrated response rate of 90.16%, with a complete response of 82.59% and a partial response of 22.95%. ATC source, HLA matching, steroid intake, and age group markedly influenced response rates. Donor-derived T-cell treatments exhibited a higher response rate (93.66%) compared to third-party sources (88.94%). HLA-matched patients demonstrated a response rate of 92.90%, while mismatched patients had a lower rate. Children showed a response rate of 83.40%, while adults had a notably higher rate of 98.46%. Adverse events were minimal, with graft-versus-host disease occurring in 24.32% of patients. ATC shows promising response rates in treating CMV infections post-HSCT, with an acceptable safety profile. However, to establish its efficacy conclusively and compare it with other antiviral treatments, randomised controlled trials are essential. Further research should prioritise such trials over observational and one-arm studies to provide robust evidence for clinical decision-making.
Topics: Humans; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; T-Lymphocytes; Treatment Outcome; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Cytomegalovirus; Transplantation, Homologous
PubMed: 38878003
DOI: 10.1002/rmv.2558 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Immunotherapy treatments aim to modulate the host's immune response to either mitigate it in inflammatory/autoimmune disease or enhance it against infection or cancer....
Immunotherapy treatments aim to modulate the host's immune response to either mitigate it in inflammatory/autoimmune disease or enhance it against infection or cancer. Among different immunotherapies reaching clinical application during the last years, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) immunotherapy has emerged as an effective treatment for cancer where different CAR T cells have already been approved. Yet their use against infectious diseases is an area still relatively poorly explored, albeit with tremendous potential for research and clinical application. Infectious diseases represent a global health challenge, with the escalating threat of antimicrobial resistance underscoring the need for alternative therapeutic approaches. This review aims to systematically evaluate the current applications of CAR immunotherapy in infectious diseases and discuss its potential for future applications. Notably, CAR cell therapies, initially developed for cancer treatment, are gaining recognition as potential remedies for infectious diseases. The review sheds light on significant progress in CAR T cell therapy directed at viral and opportunistic fungal infections.
Topics: Humans; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Immunotherapy; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Neoplasms; Communicable Diseases
PubMed: 38352878
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1289303 -
European Radiology Experimental Jan 2020A wide range of cancer immunotherapy approaches has been developed including non-specific immune-stimulants such as cytokines, cancer vaccines, immune checkpoint...
A wide range of cancer immunotherapy approaches has been developed including non-specific immune-stimulants such as cytokines, cancer vaccines, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and adoptive T cell therapy. Among them, ICIs are the most commonly used and intensively studied. Since 2011, these drugs have received marketing authorisation for melanoma, lung, bladder, renal, and head and neck cancers, with remarkable and long-lasting treatment response in some patients. The novel mechanism of action of ICIs, with immune and T cell activation, leads to unusual patterns of response on imaging, with the advent of so-called pseudoprogression being more pronounced and frequently observed when compared to other anticancer therapies. Pseudoprogression, described in about 2-10% of patients treated with ICIs, corresponds to an increase of tumour burden and/or the appearance of new lesions due to infiltration by activated T cells before the disease responds to therapy. To overcome the limitation of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) to assess these specific changes, new imaging criteria-so-called immune-related response criteria and then immune-related RECIST (irRECIST)-were proposed. The major modification involved the inclusion of the measurements of new target lesions into disease assessments and the need for a 4-week re-assessment to confirm or not confirm progression. The RECIST working group introduced the new concept of "unconfirmed progression", into the irRECIST. This paper reviews current immunotherapeutic approaches and summarises radiologic criteria to evaluate new patterns of response to immunotherapy. Furthermore, imaging features of immunotherapy-related adverse events and available predictive biomarkers of response are presented.
Topics: Diagnostic Imaging; Humans; Immunotherapy; Neoplasms; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
PubMed: 31900689
DOI: 10.1186/s41747-019-0134-1 -
Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy Nov 2022Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising treatment option for relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies and multiple myeloma.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a promising treatment option for relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies and multiple myeloma. Underlying and treatment-related variables may contribute to the development of infectious complications.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the incidence of overall and severe (grade ≥3) infection in patients with hematological malignancies receiving CAR T-cells. Secondary outcomes included the specific rates of bacterial, viral and invasive fungal infection (IFI), and infection-related mortality. PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 27 May 2022. Sensitivity analysis were performed according to the type of malignancy and study design (randomized clinical trials [RCTs] or observational studies).
RESULTS
Forty-five studies (34 RCTs) comprising 3,591 patients were included. The pooled incidence rates of overall and severe infection were 33.8% (I = 96.31%) and 16.2% (I = 74.41%). The respiratory tract was the most common site of infection. Most events were bacterial or viral, whereas the occurrence of IFI was rare. The pooled attributable mortality was 1.8% (I = 43.44%).
CONCLUSIONS
Infection is a frequent adverse event in patients receiving CAR T-cell therapy. Further research should address specific risk factors in this population.
Topics: Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Antigens, CD19; Hematologic Neoplasms; Neoplasms
PubMed: 36148506
DOI: 10.1080/14787210.2022.2128762 -
Gastroenterology Research Dec 2020The utilization of immunotherapy is increasing to the point of becoming the fifth pillar of management alongside surgical intervention, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and... (Review)
Review
The utilization of immunotherapy is increasing to the point of becoming the fifth pillar of management alongside surgical intervention, chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapy. However, gastrointestinal adverse effects and toxicities have been frequently cited with its use. As per literature, the most common adverse effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors is watery and non-bloody diarrhea. Adoptive cell therapy can lead to delayed, on-target but off-tumor adverse effects which are unknown and may be life-threatening. The use of anti-angiogenic monoclonal antibodies can lead to bowel perforations, whereas epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and anti-HER2 agents are frequently associated with diarrhea. Minimal adverse effects have been associated with therapeutic cancer vaccines; however, additional studies are needed to determine their efficacy and potential toxicities. To provide an in-depth review of the gastrointestinal side effects of immunotherapeutic agents, we performed a thorough literature search using multiple online search engines such as PubMed, Google Scholar and Ovid MEDLINE, along with a review of the guidelines from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Cancer Research Institute on immunotherapy. In this systematic review, we detail the gastrointestinal adverse effects of immunotherapy and describe their management. With the advent of newer immunotherapeutic agents and the consistent approval of current agents by FDA for a wide spectrum of cancers, it is vital for physicians to familiarize themselves with their adverse effects for prompt diagnosis and early intervention to decrease adverse outcomes.
PubMed: 33447301
DOI: 10.14740/gr1340