-
BMJ Clinical Evidence Mar 2007Acute organophosphorus poisoning occurs after dermal, respiratory, or oral exposure to either low-volatility pesticides (e.g. chlorpyrifos, dimethoate) or... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Acute organophosphorus poisoning occurs after dermal, respiratory, or oral exposure to either low-volatility pesticides (e.g. chlorpyrifos, dimethoate) or high-volatility nerve gases (e.g. sarin, tabun). Most cases occur in resource-poor countries as a result of occupational or deliberate exposure to organophosphorus pesticides.
METHODS AND OBJECTIVES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatments for acute organophosphorus poisoning? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and other important databases up to August 2006 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 22 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: activated charcoal, alpha2 adrenergic receptor agonists, atropine, benzodiazepines, butyrylcholinesterase replacement therapy, cathartics, extracorporeal clearance, gastric lavage, glycopyrronium bromide, ipecacuanha, magnesium sulphate, milk or other home remedies, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, organophosphorus hydrolases, oximes, sodium bicarbonate, washing the poisoned person and removing contaminated clothing.
Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Charcoal; Gastric Lavage; Humans; Organophosphate Poisoning; Oximes; Pesticides; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate; Sodium Bicarbonate
PubMed: 19454054
DOI: No ID Found -
Investigative and Clinical Urology May 2024To evaluate efficacy and safety of beta-3 adrenergic agonists in adults with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To evaluate efficacy and safety of beta-3 adrenergic agonists in adults with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
According to a protocol (CRD42022350079), we searched multiple data sources for published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to 2nd August 2022. Two review authors independently screened studies and abstracted data from the included studies. We performed statistical analyses by using a random-effects model and interpreted them according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. We used GRADE guidance to rate the certainty of evidence (CoE).
RESULTS
We found data to inform two comparisons: beta-3 adrenergic agonists versus placebo (4 RCTs) and anticholinergics (2 RCTs). Only mirabegron was used for intervention in all included studies. Compared to placebo, beta-3 adrenergic agonists may have a clinically unimportant effect on urinary symptoms score (mean difference [MD] -2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] -4.78 to -0.22; ²=92%; 2 RCTs; 192 participants; low CoE) based on minimal clinically important difference of 3. We are very uncertain of the effects of beta-3 adrenergic agonists on quality of life (MD 10.86, 95% CI 1.21 to 20.50; ²=41%; 2 RCTs; 98 participants; very low CoE). Beta-3 adrenergic agonists may result in little to no difference in major adverse events (cardiovascular adverse events) (risk ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.14 to 2.37; ²=0%; 4 RCTs; 310 participants; low CoE). Compared to anticholinergics, no study reported urinary symptom scores and quality of life. There were no major adverse events (cardiovascular adverse events) in either study group (1 study; 60 participants; very low CoE).
CONCLUSIONS
Compared to placebo, beta-3 adrenergic agonists may have similar effects on urinary symptom scores and major adverse events. There were uncertainties about their effects on quality of life. Compared to anticholinergics, we are either very uncertain or have no evidence about urinary symptom scores, quality of life, and major adverse events.
Topics: Humans; Adrenergic beta-3 Receptor Agonists; Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic; Treatment Outcome; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38714512
DOI: 10.4111/icu.20230271 -
Cancer Causes & Control : CCC Jun 2022Antihypertensive medications may impact colorectal cancer risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of associations, with colorectal cancer risk, of five... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Antihypertensive medications may impact colorectal cancer risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of associations, with colorectal cancer risk, of five classes of antihypertensive medications: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), beta-blockers (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and diuretics.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library to identify relevant studies evaluating associations of ACEIs, ARBs, BBs, CCBs, and diuretics with colorectal cancer risk. Meta-analytic risk ratios (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using the inverse variance method.
RESULTS
No overall significant associations with colorectal cancer risk were observed; ACEIs (5 studies) RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.91-1.23, ARBs (5 studies) RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.80-1.11, BBs (4 studies) RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.92-1.08, CCBs (4 studies) RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88-1.18, and diuretics (6 studies) RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.90-1.17. There was considerable heterogeneity across studies, partly explained by differences in study design and location. When stratified by study location, there was significantly reduced colorectal cancer risk for ARB use in Asian populations (2 studies, RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58-0.83).
CONCLUSION
No significant colorectal cancer risk with ACEIs, BBs, CCBs, or diuretics was observed. ARB use may be associated with decreased risk of colorectal cancer in Asian populations, although additional studies in diverse populations are needed to confirm associations and help understand possible reasons for geographical differences.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Calcium Channel Blockers; Colorectal Neoplasms; Diuretics; Humans; Hypertension
PubMed: 35314908
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-022-01570-1 -
JPMA. the Journal of the Pakistan... Jan 2018The study was planned to assimilate quantitatively the available evidences on association of Arg16Gly and Glu27Gln with asthma and to produce more precise results. All... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The study was planned to assimilate quantitatively the available evidences on association of Arg16Gly and Glu27Gln with asthma and to produce more precise results. All case-control studies conducted on adults were searched on Medline, Embase, PubMed, Wiley online library according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The strength of association was measured by odds ratios with 95% confidence interval. A total of 17 case-control studies were included in the meta-analysis and there was no significant association of asthma with Arg16Gly (odds ratio = 1.19; 95% confidence interval = 0.75-1.50, p=0.459) and Glu27Gln of ADRb2 polymorphism (odds ratio=0.87, 95% confidence interval =0.44-1.71, p=0.683). Moreover, neither Gly16 allele (odds ratio = 0.98; 95% confidence interval = 0.70-1.38, p=0.867) nor Glu27 allele (odds ratio = 0.67, 95% confidence interval = 0.38-1.19, p=0.169) contributed to asthma susceptibility. There was also no significant association between haplotypes of both single nucleotide polymorphisms and asthma (p>0.05). Data indicated that adrenergic receptor b2 did not contribute markedly to susceptibility to asthma (p>0.05).
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Asthma; Case-Control Studies; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Genetic Association Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-2; Young Adult
PubMed: 29371726
DOI: No ID Found -
BMC Pulmonary Medicine Nov 2019The published data on the association between β2-adrenergic receptor gene polymorphisms and asthma susceptibility are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The published data on the association between β2-adrenergic receptor gene polymorphisms and asthma susceptibility are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of this association, a meta-analysis was performed.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Wanfang, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases to identify eligible studies. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the strength of the association. A sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the influence of individual studies on the overall effect estimates, and funnel plots and Egger's tests were used for indications of publication bias.
RESULTS
Seventy three studies with three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) (rs1042713, c.G46A, p.Gly16Arg; rs1042714, c.G79C, p.Gln27Glu; rs1042711, c.T-47C, p.Cys19Arg) were finally identified. For the rs1042713 polymorphism, no significant association with asthma risk was found in the overall population. However, a significant protective association was found in the Indian population in the dominant model comparison (OR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59-0.87, I = 25%, studies = 5, cases = 1190, controls = 1241). A significant risk association was found in the Arab population in the dominant model comparison (OR = 1.75, 95% CI = 1.14-2.70, I = 0%, studies = 2, cases = 307, controls = 361) and the homozygote model comparison (OR = 1.88, 95% CI = 1.17-3.02, I = 0%, studies = 2, cases = 307, controls = 361), and in the Hispanic-Latino population in the dominant model comparison (OR = 1.68, 95% CI = 1.10-2.55, I = 77%, studies = 5, cases = 1026, controls = 1412). For the rs1042714 polymorphism, we found a significant association in the recessive model comparison (OR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.70-0.98, I = 44%, studies = 52, cases = 8242, controls = 16,832), the homozygote genotype comparison (OR = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.72-0.98, I = 25%, studies = 52, cases = 8242, controls = 16,832) and the allelic genetic model (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.83-0.99, I = 59%, studies = 52, cases = 8242, controls = 16,832) in the overall population. When stratified by age, a significant association was also found in children in the recessive model comparison (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.39-0.88, I = 58%, studies = 18, cases = 2498, controls = 2510) and the homozygote genotype comparison (OR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.43-0.92, I = 46%, studies = 18, cases = 2498, controls = 2510), but not in adult. For the rs1042711 polymorphism, no significant associations were found in the any genetic model.
CONCLUSION
The meta-analysis suggests that the ADRB2 rs1042714 polymorphism has a protective association with asthma in the overall population and the pediatric subgroup.
Topics: Alleles; Asthma; Child; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genotype; Humans; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Receptors, Adrenergic, beta-2; Risk Factors
PubMed: 31699066
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-019-0962-z -
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases Dec 2015Acute urinary retention (AUR) is a common urological emergency. In this article, we review the current literature and present a structured summary in management of AUR. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Acute urinary retention (AUR) is a common urological emergency. In this article, we review the current literature and present a structured summary in management of AUR.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted using the keywords 'acute AND retention AND urin*' within the title in search engines including Medline, EMBASE and EBM Review. The obtained literature was manually reviewed by the primary author (PDY) and was further refined by confining the subject to management of AUR. Exclusion criteria included paediatric and female population studies, case reports, reviews, surveys, economical assessment and articles on AUR in prostate cancer and post-operative patients.
RESULTS
Total of 54 articles met our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The trial without catheter (TWOC) post-immediate catheterisation is widely practiced although there remains a significant variability in terms of type and duration of catheterisation required, use of concurrent medical therapy or post-catheterisation management. Our systematic review and subsequent meta-analysis has shown superiority of α1-adrenergic receptor blockers over placebo in achieving successful voiding in patients with AUR. Suprapubic catheter (SPC) is an alternative to urethral catheterisation (indwelling catheter (IDC)) and may provide several advantages. Clean intermittent self-catheterisation may be a safe and useful option for patients with AUR until their definitive management. The overall long-term outcome of in-and-out catheterisation remains promising in selected patients. Surgery is an end point in patients with unsuccessful TWOC as well as in those with significant lower urinary tract symptoms post-successful TWOC.
CONCLUSIONS
We recommend use of α1-adrenergic receptor blockers before TWOC and discourage emergency operative management. Use of SPC over IDC in AUR is debatable. Duration of catheterisation is controversial but <3 days is a safe option in avoiding catheterisation-related complications. Although TURP remains the current gold standard, there has been an emergence of newer operative management utilising laser techniques.
Topics: 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors; Acute Disease; Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists; Disease Management; Humans; Male; Odds Ratio; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Catheterization; Urinary Retention
PubMed: 26195469
DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2015.15 -
ESC Heart Failure Oct 2022Due to concerns regarding neurohormonal activation and fluid retention, adrenergic alpha-1 receptor antagonists (A1Bs) are generally avoided in the setting of heart... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Due to concerns regarding neurohormonal activation and fluid retention, adrenergic alpha-1 receptor antagonists (A1Bs) are generally avoided in the setting of heart disease, namely, symptomatic heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, this contraindication is mainly supported by ancient studies, having recently been challenged by newer ones. We aim to perform a comprehensive meta-analysis aimed at ascertaining the extent to which A1Bs might influence cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Web of Science for both prospective and retrospective studies, published until 1 December 2020, addressing the impact of A1Bs on both clinical outcomes-namely, acute heart failure (AHF), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), CV and all-cause mortality-and on CV surrogate measures, specifically left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and exercise tolerance, by means of exercise duration. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and studies including only HF patients were further investigated separately. Study-specific odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs) were pooled using traditional meta-analytic techniques, under a random-effects model. A record was registered in PROSPERO database, with the code number CRD42020181804. Fifteen RCTs, three non-randomized prospective and two retrospective studies, encompassing 32 851, 19 287, and 71 600 patients, respectively, were deemed eligible; 62 256 patients were allocated to A1B, on the basis of multiple clinical indications: chronic HF itself [14 studies, with 72 558 patients, including seven studies with 850 HFrEF or HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) patients], arterial hypertension (four studies, with 44 184 patients) and low urinary tract symptoms (two studies, with 6996 patients). There were 25 998 AHF events, 1325 ACS episodes, 955 CV deaths and 33 567 all-cause deaths. When considering only RCTs, A1Bs were, indeed, found to increase AHF risk (OR 1.78, [1.46, 2.16] 95% CI, P < 0.00001, i 2%), although displaying no significant effect on neither ACS nor CV or all-cause mortality rates (OR 1.02, [0.91, 1.15] 95% CI, i 0%; OR 0.95, [0.47, 1.91] 95% CI, i 17%; OR 1.1, [0.84, 1.43] 95% CI, i 17%, respectively). Besides, when only HF patients were evaluated, A1Bs revealed themselves neutral towards not only ACS, CV, and all-cause mortality events (OR 0.49, [0.1, 2.47] 95% CI, i 0%; OR 0.7, [0.21, 2.31] 95% CI, i 21%; OR 1.09, [0.53, 2.23] 95% CI, i 17%, respectively), but also AHF (OR 1.13, [0.66, 1.92] 95% CI, i 0%). As for HFrEF and HFmrEF, A1Bs were found to exert a similarly inconsequential effect on AHF rates (OR 1.01, [0.5-2.05] 95% CI, i 6%). Likewise, LVEF was not significantly influenced by A1Bs (MD 1.66, [-2.18, 5.50] 95% CI, i 58%). Most strikingly, exercise tolerance was higher in those under this drug class (MD 139.16, [65.52, 212.8] 95% CI, P < 0.001, i 26%). A1Bs do not seem to exert a negative influence on the prognosis of HF-and even of HFrEF-patients, thus contradicting currently held views. These drugs' impact on other major CV outcomes also appear trivial and they may even increment exercise tolerance.
Topics: Humans; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left
PubMed: 35894772
DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14012 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2009Delirium occurs in 30% of hospitalised patients and is associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased morbidity and mortality. The results of uncontrolled studies... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Delirium occurs in 30% of hospitalised patients and is associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased morbidity and mortality. The results of uncontrolled studies have been unclear, with some suggesting that benzodiazepines may be useful in controlling non-alcohol related delirium.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the effectiveness and incidence of adverse effects of benzodiazapines in the treatment of non-alcohol withdrawal related delirium.
SEARCH STRATEGY
The trials were identified from a search of the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group on 26 February 2008 using the search terms: (deliri* or confusion) and (benzo* or lorazepam," or "alprazolam" or "ativan" or diazepam or valium or chlordiazepam).The CDCIG Specialized Register contains records from major health databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, LILACS) as well as many ongoing trial databases and grey literature sources.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Trials had to be unconfounded, randomized and with concealed allocation of subjects. Additionally, selected trials had to have assessed patients pre- and post-treatment. Where crossover design was present, only data from the first part of the trial were to be examined.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers extracted data from included trials. Data were pooled where possible, and were to be analysed using appropriate statistical methods. Odd ratios or average differences were to be calculated. Only "intention to treat" data were to be included.
MAIN RESULTS
Only one trial satisfying the selection criteria could be identified. In this trial, comparing the effect of the benzodiazepine, lorazepam, with dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha-2-adrenergic receptor agonist, on delirium among mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients, dexmedetomidine treatment was associated with an increased number of delirium- and coma-free days compared with lorazepam treated patients (dexmedetomidine patients, average seven days; lorazepam patients, average three days; P = 0.01). One partially controlled study showed no advantage of a benzodiazepine (alprazolam) compared with neuroleptics in treating agitation associated with delirium, and another partially controlled study showed decreased effectiveness of a benzodiazepine (lorazepam), and increased adverse effects, compared with neuroleptics (haloperidol, chlorpromazine) for the treatment of acute confusion.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
No adequately controlled trials could be found to support the use of benzodiazepines in the treatment of non-alcohol withdrawal related delirium among hospitalised patients, and at this time benzodiazepines cannot be recommended for the control of this condition. Because of the scarcity of trials with randomization of patients, placebo control, and adequate concealment of allocation of subjects, it is clear that further research is required to determine the role of benzodiazepines in the treatment of non-alcohol withdrawal related delirium.
Topics: Benzodiazepines; Delirium; Dexmedetomidine; Humans; Lorazepam
PubMed: 19821364
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006379.pub3 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2009Delirium occurs in 30% of hospitalised patients and is associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased morbidity and mortality. The results of uncontrolled studies... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Delirium occurs in 30% of hospitalised patients and is associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased morbidity and mortality. The results of uncontrolled studies have been unclear, with some suggesting that benzodiazepines may be useful in controlling non-alcohol related delirium.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the effectiveness and incidence of adverse effects of benzodiazapines in the treatment of non-alcohol withdrawal related delirium.
SEARCH STRATEGY
The trials were identified from a search of the Specialized Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group on 26 February 2008 using the search terms: (deliri* or confusion) and (benzo* or lorazepam," or "alprazolam" or "ativan" or diazepam or valium or chlordiazepam).The CDCIG Specialized Register contains records from major health databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, LILACS) as well as many ongoing trial databases and grey literature sources.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Trials had to be unconfounded, randomized and with concealed allocation of subjects. Additionally, selected trials had to have assessed patients pre- and post-treatment. Where crossover design was present, only data from the first part of the trial were to be examined.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers extracted data from included trials. Data were pooled where possible, and were to be analysed using appropriate statistical methods. Odd ratios or average differences were to be calculated. Only "intention to treat" data were to be included.
MAIN RESULTS
Only one trial satisfying the selection criteria could be identified. In this trial, comparing the effect of the benzodiazepine, lorazepam, with dexmedetomidine, a selective alpha-2-adrenergic receptor agonist, on delirium among mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients, dexmedetomidine treatment was associated with an increased number of delirium- and coma-free days compared with lorazepam treated patients (dexmedetomidine patients, average seven days; lorazepam patients, average three days; P = 0.01). One partially controlled study showed no advantage of a benzodiazepine (alprazolam) compared with neuroleptics in treating agitation associated with delirium, and another partially controlled study showed decreased effectiveness of a benzodiazepine (lorazepam), and increased adverse effects, compared with neuroleptics (haloperidol, chlorpromazine) for the treatment of acute confusion.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
No adequately controlled trials could be found to support the use of benzodiazepines in the treatment of non-alcohol withdrawal related delirium among hospitalised patients, and at this time benzodiazepines cannot be recommended for the control of this condition. Because of the scarcity of trials with randomization of patients, placebo control, and adequate concealment of allocation of subjects, it is clear that further research is required to determine the role of benzodiazepines in the treatment of non-alcohol withdrawal related delirium.
Topics: Benzodiazepines; Delirium; Dexmedetomidine; Humans; Lorazepam
PubMed: 19160280
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006379.pub2 -
Respiratory Research Nov 2017Long-acting bronchodilators are the cornerstone of pharmacologic treatment of COPD. The new combination of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) tiotropium (TIO) and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Long-acting bronchodilators are the cornerstone of pharmacologic treatment of COPD. The new combination of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) tiotropium (TIO) and long acting beta-agonists (LABA) olodaterol (OLO) has been introduced as fist line therapy for COPD. This article analyses the evidence of efficacy and safety of the TIO/OLO combination.
METHODS
A systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) with a period of treatment of at least 6 weeks, in patients with COPD confirmed by spirometry, comparing combined treatment with TIO/OLO (approved doses only), with any of the mono-components or any other active comparator administered as an inhalator.
RESULTS
A total of 10 Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were identified (N = 10,918). TIO/OLO significantly improved trough FEV from baseline to week 12 versus TIO, OLO and LABA/ICS (0.06 L, 0.09 L and between 0.04 and 0.05 L, respectively). TIO/OLO improved transitional dyspnea index (TDI) and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) compared with mono-components, with patients more likely to achieve clinically important improvements in TDI (risk ratio [RR]: 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.07, 1.28] versus TIO and RR: 1.14, 95%CI: [1.01, 1.28] versus OLO) and in SGRQ (RR: 1.21, 95%CI: [1.12, 1.30] versus TIO and RR: 1.28, 95%CI: [1.18, 1.40] versus OLO). Patients treated with TIO/OLO showed a significant reduction in the use of rescue medication and no significant differences in frequency of general and serious adverse events were observed between TIO/OLO and mono-components.
CONCLUSIONS
Treatment with TIO/OLO provided significant improvements in lung function versus mono-components and LABA/ICS with more patients achieving significant improvements in dyspnea and health status. No differences in adverse events were observed compared with other active treatments.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO register of systematic reviews ( CRD42016040162 ).
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Benzoxazines; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Combinations; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Muscarinic Antagonists; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spirometry; Tiotropium Bromide; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29178871
DOI: 10.1186/s12931-017-0683-x