-
Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine Mar 2017The tenth European Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Medicine took place in April 2016, attended by a large delegation of experts from Europe and elsewhere. The focus...
Tenth European Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Medicine: recommendations for accepted and non-accepted clinical indications and practice of hyperbaric oxygen treatment.
The tenth European Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Medicine took place in April 2016, attended by a large delegation of experts from Europe and elsewhere. The focus of the meeting was the revision of the European Committee on Hyperbaric Medicine (ECHM) list of accepted indications for hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT), based on a thorough review of the best available research and evidence-based medicine (EBM). For this scope, the modified GRADE system for evidence analysis, together with the DELPHI system for consensus evaluation, were adopted. The indications for HBOT, including those promulgated by the ECHM previously, were analysed by selected experts, based on an extensive review of the literature and of the available EBM studies. The indications were divided as follows: Type 1, where HBOT is strongly indicated as a primary treatment method, as it is supported by sufficiently strong evidence; Type 2, where HBOT is suggested as it is supported by acceptable levels of evidence; Type 3, where HBOT can be considered as a possible/optional measure, but it is not yet supported by sufficiently strong evidence. For each type, three levels of evidence were considered: A, when the number of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is considered sufficient; B, when there are some RCTs in favour of the indication and there is ample expert consensus; C, when the conditions do not allow for proper RCTs but there is ample and international expert consensus. For the first time, the conference also issued 'negative' recommendations for those conditions where there is Type 1 evidence that HBOT is not indicated. The conference also gave consensus-agreed recommendations for the standard of practice of HBOT.
Topics: Bacterial Infections; Biomedical Research; Brain Injuries; Burns; Carbon Monoxide Poisoning; Crush Injuries; Decompression Sickness; Embolism, Air; Europe; Evidence-Based Medicine; Femur Head Necrosis; Fractures, Open; Hearing Loss, Sudden; Humans; Hyperbaric Oxygenation; Osteomyelitis; Radiation Injuries; Skin Transplantation; Wound Healing
PubMed: 28357821
DOI: 10.28920/dhm47.1.24-32 -
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology... May 2023To quantitatively analyze the risk factors for air embolism following computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) and qualitatively... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
To quantitatively analyze the risk factors for air embolism following computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) and qualitatively review their characteristics. The databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang Data, VIP information, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched on January 4, 2021, for studies reporting the occurrence of air embolisms following CT-guided PTNB. After study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment, the characteristics of the included cases were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed. A total of 154 cases of air embolism following CT-guided PTNB were reported. The reported incidence was 0.06% to 4.80%, and 35 (22.73%) patients were asymptomatic. An unconscious or unresponsive state was the most common symptom (29.87%). Air was most commonly found in the left ventricle (44.81%), and 104 (67.53%) patients recovered without sequelae. Air location ( < 0.001), emphysema ( = 0.061), and cough ( = 0.076) were associated with clinical symptoms. Air location ( = 0.015) and symptoms ( < 0.001) were significantly associated with prognosis. Lesion location [odds ratio (OR): 1.85, = 0.017], lesion subtype (OR: 3.78, = 0.01), pneumothorax (OR: 2.16, = 0.003), hemorrhage (OR: 3.20, < 0.001), and lesions located above the left atrium (OR: 4.35, = 0.042) were significant risk factors for air embolism. Based on the current evidence, a subsolid lesion, being located in the lower lobe, the presence of pneumothorax or hemorrhage, and lesions located above the left atrium were significant risk factors for air embolism.
Topics: Humans; Pneumothorax; Embolism, Air; Biopsy, Needle; Lung; Risk Factors; Lung Neoplasms; Hemorrhage; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Image-Guided Biopsy; Radiography, Interventional; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36994842
DOI: 10.4274/dir.2022.221187 -
European Radiology Apr 2021To determine the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic indicators of symptomatic air embolism after percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy (PTLB) by conducting a...
OBJECTIVES
To determine the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic indicators of symptomatic air embolism after percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy (PTLB) by conducting a systematic review and pooled analysis.
METHODS
We searched the EMBASE and OVID-MEDLINE databases to identify studies that dealt with air embolism after PTLB and had extractable outcomes. The incidence of air embolism was pooled using a random effects model, and the causes of heterogeneity were investigated. To analyze risk factors for symptomatic embolism and unfavorable outcomes, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.
RESULTS
The pooled incidence of symptomatic air embolism after PTLB was 0.08% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.048-0.128%; I = 45%). In the subgroup analysis and meta-regression, guidance modality and study size were found to explain the heterogeneity. Of the patients with symptomatic air embolism, 32.7% had unfavorable outcomes. The presence of an underlying disease (odds ratio [OR], 5.939; 95% CI, 1.029-34.279; p = 0.046), the use of a ≥ 19-gauge needle (OR, 10.046; 95% CI, 1.103-91.469; p = 0.041), and coronary or intracranial air embolism (OR, 19.871; 95% CI, 2.725-14.925; p = 0.003) were independent risk factors for symptomatic embolism. Unfavorable outcomes were independently associated with the use of aspiration biopsy rather than core biopsy (OR, 3.302; 95% CI, 1.149-9.492; p = 0.027) and location of the air embolism in the coronary arteries or intracranial spaces (OR = 5.173; 95% CI = 1.309-20.447; p = 0.019).
CONCLUSION
The pooled incidence of symptomatic air embolism after PTLB was 0.08%, and one-third of cases had sequelae or died. Identifying whether coronary or intracranial emboli exist is crucial in suspected cases of air embolism after PTLB.
KEY POINTS
• The pooled incidence of symptomatic air embolism after percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy was 0.08%, and one-third of patients with symptomatic air embolism had sequelae or died. • The risk factors for symptomatic air embolism were the presence of an underlying disease, the use of a ≥ 19-gauge needle, and coronary or intracranial air embolism. • Sequelae and death in patients with symptomatic air embolism were associated with the use of aspiration biopsy and coronary or intracranial locations of the air embolism.
Topics: Biopsy, Needle; Embolism, Air; Humans; Incidence; Lung; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 33051730
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07372-w -
European Journal of Internal Medicine Jan 2016Air pollution is a leading global problem for public health. A number of ambient pollutants have been involved, including carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2),... (Review)
Review
Air pollution is a leading global problem for public health. A number of ambient pollutants have been involved, including carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), ozone (O3) and particulate matter (PM). Although exposure to PM has been linked to a wide array of cardiovascular and respiratory disorders, its effect on venous thrombotic disorders is still uncertain. To elucidate this issue, we have performed a systematic review on the existing literature on the association between PM and venous thromboembolism (VTE), using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane electronic databases. Of the 158 reviewed studies, 11 of them (3 case-crossover studies, 2 time-series studies, 2 case-control studies, 2 prospective cohort studies, 2 retrospective studies) involving more than 500,000 events fulfilled the inclusion criteria and results are presented here. Because there was substantial heterogeneity in study design, duration of follow-up, statistical measure of effects, clinical outcomes and threshold, we refrained to perform a quantitative analysis of the available data and carried out only a systematic review. Overall, the literature data suggest a link between PM and VTE, but further trials on larger populations of patients with homogeneous study designs and outcomes are warranted.
Topics: Air Pollution; Humans; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Public Health; Respiratory Tract Diseases; Socioeconomic Factors; Sulfur Dioxide; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 26639051
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2015.11.012 -
Radiology Research and Practice 2014Following the first case of a systemic air embolism due to percutaneous CT-guided lung biopsy in our clinic we analysed the literature regarding this matter in view of... (Review)
Review
Influenceable and Avoidable Risk Factors for Systemic Air Embolism due to Percutaneous CT-Guided Lung Biopsy: Patient Positioning and Coaxial Biopsy Technique-Case Report, Systematic Literature Review, and a Technical Note.
Following the first case of a systemic air embolism due to percutaneous CT-guided lung biopsy in our clinic we analysed the literature regarding this matter in view of influenceable or avoidable risk factors. A systematic review of literature reporting cases of systemic air embolism due to CT-guided lung biopsy was performed to find out whether prone positioning might be a risk factor regarding this issue. In addition, a technical note concerning coaxial biopsy practice is presented. Prone position seems to have relevance for the development and/or clinical manifestation of air embolism due to CT-guided lung biopsy and should be considered a risk factor, at least as far as lesions in the lower parts of the lung are concerned. Biopsies of small or cavitary lesions in coaxial technique should be performed using a hemostatic valve.
PubMed: 25431666
DOI: 10.1155/2014/349062 -
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine Jun 2022Long-distance travel is assumed to be a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the available data have not clearly demonstrated the strength of this...
INTRODUCTION
Long-distance travel is assumed to be a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the available data have not clearly demonstrated the strength of this relationship, nor have they shown evidence for the role of thromboprophylaxis.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the literature. We also summarized available guidelines from 5 groups.
RESULTS
We found 18 studies that addressed this question. Based on the data presented in the review, we conclude that there is an association between VTE and length of travel, but this association is mild to moderate in effect size with odds ratios between 1.1 and 4. A dose-response relationship between VTE and travel time was identified, with a 26% higher risk for every 2 h of air travel (P=0.005) starting after 4 h. The quality of evidence for both travel length and thromboprophylaxis was low. However, low-risk prophylactic measures such as graduated compression stockings were shown to be effective in VTE prevention. There is heterogeneity among the different practice guidelines. The guidelines generally concur that no prophylaxis is necessary in travelers without known thrombosis risk factors and advocate for conservative treatment such as compression stockings over pharmacologic prophylaxis.
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude air travel is a risk factor for VTE and that there is a dose relationship starting at 4 h. For patients with risk factors, graduated compression stockings are effective prophylaxis.
Topics: Anticoagulants; Humans; Risk Factors; Stockings, Compression; Travel; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 35370084
DOI: 10.1016/j.wem.2022.02.004 -
Cureus Feb 2024To determine mortality and morbidity associated with coronary air embolism (CAE) secondary to complications of percutaneous lung biopsy (PLB) and illicit-specific risk... (Review)
Review
To determine mortality and morbidity associated with coronary air embolism (CAE) secondary to complications of percutaneous lung biopsy (PLB) and illicit-specific risk factor associated with this complication and overall mortality, we searched PubMed to identify reported cases of CAE secondary to PLB. After assessing inclusion eligibility, a total of 31 cases from 26 publications were included in our study. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. In 31 reported cases, cardiac arrest was more common after left lower lobe (LLL) biopsies (n=4, 80%, p=0.001). Of these patients who suffered from cardiac arrest, CAE was found more frequently in the right coronary artery (RCA) than other locations but did not reach statistical significance (n=5, 62%, p=0.39). At the same time, intervention in the LLL was significantly associated with patient mortality (n=3, 60%, p=0.010). Of the patients who died, CAE was more likely to have occurred in the RCA, but this association was not statistically significant (n=4, 57%, p=0.33). LLL biopsies have a statistically significant correlation with cardiac arrest and patient death. More research is needed to examine the effect of the air location in the RCA on patient morbidity and mortality.
PubMed: 38558608
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55234 -
World Journal of Gastrointestinal... Aug 2013Gastrointestinal endoscopy has become an important modality for the diagnosis and treatment of various gastrointestinal disorders. One of its major advantages is that it...
Gastrointestinal endoscopy has become an important modality for the diagnosis and treatment of various gastrointestinal disorders. One of its major advantages is that it is minimally invasive and has an excellent safety record. Nevertheless, some complications do occur, and endoscopists are well aware and prepared to deal with the commonly recognized ones including bleeding, perforation, infection, and adverse effects from the sedative medications. Air embolism is a very rare endoscopic complication but possesses the potential to be severe and fatal. It can present with cardiopulmonary instability and neurologic symptoms. The diagnosis may be difficult because of its clinical presentation, which can overlap with sedation-related cardiopulmonary problems or neurologic symptoms possibly attributed to an ischemic or hemorrhagic central nervous system event. Increased awareness is essential for prompt recognition of the air embolism, which can allow potentially life-saving therapy to be provided. Therefore, we wanted to review the risk factors, the clinical presentation, and the therapy of an air embolism from the perspective of the practicing endoscopist.
PubMed: 23951390
DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i8.359 -
Journal of General Internal Medicine Jan 2007Despite multiple attempts to document and quantify the danger of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following prolonged travel, there is still uncertainty about the magnitude... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
Despite multiple attempts to document and quantify the danger of venous thromboembolism (VTE) following prolonged travel, there is still uncertainty about the magnitude of risk and what can be done to lower it.
OBJECTIVES
To review the methodologic strength of the literature, estimate the risk of travel-related VTE, evaluate the efficacy of preventive treatments, and develop evidence-based recommendations for practice.
DATA SOURCES
Studies identified from MEDLINE from 1966 through December 2005, supplemented by a review of the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and relevant bibliographies.
STUDY SELECTION
We included all clinical studies that either reported primary data concerning travel as a risk factor for VTE or tested preventive measures for travel-related VTE.
DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers reviewed each study independently to assess inclusion criteria, classify research design, and rate methodologic features. The effect of methodologic differences, VTE risk, and travel duration on VTE rate was evaluated using a logistic regression model.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Twenty-four published reports, totaling 25 studies, met inclusion criteria (6 case-control studies, 10 cohort studies, and 9 randomized controlled trials). Method of screening for VTE [screening ultrasound compared to usual clinical care, odds ratio (OR) 390], outcome measure [all VTE compared to pulmonary embolism (PE) only, OR 21], duration of travel (<6 hours compared to 6-8 hours, OR 0.011), and clinical risk ("higher" risk travelers compared to "lower," OR 3.6) were significantly related to VTE rate. Clinical VTE after prolonged travel is rare [27 PE per million flights diagnosed through usual clinical care, 0.05% symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed through screening ultrasounds], but asymptomatic thrombi of uncertain clinical significance are more common. Graduated compression stockings prevented travel-related VTE (P < 0.05 in 4 of 6 studies), aspirin did not, and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) showed a trend toward efficacy in one study.
CONCLUSIONS
All travelers, regardless of VTE risk, should avoid dehydration and frequently exercise leg muscles. Travelers on a flight of less than 6 hours and those with no known risk factors for VTE, regardless of the duration of the flight, do not need DVT prophylaxis. Travelers with 1 or more risk factors for VTE should consider graduated compression stockings and/or LMWH for flights longer than 6 hours.
Topics: Aircraft; Anticoagulants; Exercise; Heparin; Humans; Phytotherapy; Pulmonary Embolism; Stockings, Compression; Time Factors; Travel; Venous Thrombosis
PubMed: 17351849
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-006-0016-0 -
Journal of Thoracic Imaging Jul 2021Cavitary lung lesions often pose a diagnostic challenge, and tissue sampling can be required to obtain a confident diagnosis. Many authors contend that a computed...
PURPOSE
Cavitary lung lesions often pose a diagnostic challenge, and tissue sampling can be required to obtain a confident diagnosis. Many authors contend that a computed tomography-guided percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy (PTLB) of a cavitary lung lesion places a patient at higher risk for systemic air embolism (SAE) compared with biopsy of a noncavitary lesion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We reviewed the literature for studies of SAE complicating PTLB. We searched English-language articles indexed through PubMed, Embase, and Ovid Medline and included articles published up to March 31, 2020.
RESULTS
We identified 10 case reports of SAE complicating PTLB, and 3 case-cohort studies comparing cavitary and noncavitary lesion biopsy. Among the case-cohort studies reviewed, 4 SAE occurred among 145 biopsies of cavitary lesions (2.7%), and 65 SAE occurred among 3050 biopsies of noncavitary lesions (2.1%). The pooled odds ratio of PTLB complicating SAE of cavitary lesions compared with noncavitary lesions was 1.29 (95% confidence interval: 0.47-3.60). No deaths following SAE after computed tomography-guided PTLB of cavitary lesions were reported in recent literature.
CONCLUSIONS
On the basis of available evidence, air embolism rates are similar for PTLB of cavitary and noncavitary lesions. Additional research and registry studies are necessary to better understand this topic.
Topics: Biopsy, Needle; Embolism, Air; Humans; Image-Guided Biopsy; Lung; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 33631775
DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000581