-
HIV Clinical Trials Nov 2016Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a component of many combinations of antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimens. Although potent and generally well tolerated, TDF may... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a component of many combinations of antiretroviral treatment (ART) regimens. Although potent and generally well tolerated, TDF may cause renal and bone toxicity. The magnitude of off-target side effects is proposed to be related to tenofovir plasma concentrations, which are affected by food and drug-drug interactions with concomitant antiretrovirals.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic literature review and qualitatively report on renal and bone safety outcomes associated with efavirenz (EFV), emtricitabine (FTC), and TDF (EFV+FTC+TDF) ART.
METHODS
Embase and PubMed databases were searched for randomized clinical trials and observational cohort studies reporting on HIV treatment with EFV+FTC+TDF. Relevant articles were hand-searched for renal (Grade 3-4 serum creatinine/estimated glomerular filtration rate elevations, renal adverse events [AEs], discontinuation due to renal AEs, and urinary biomarkers) and bone outcomes (bone mineral density [BMD] reductions, bone turnover markers, and fracture), and results compiled qualitatively.
RESULTS
Of 337 retrieved articles, 29 reporting renal and 11 reporting bone outcomes met the review criteria. EFV+FTC+TDF was associated with a low frequency of renal AEs and treatment discontinuations due to renal AEs. Renal AEs were more frequent when TDF was taken with protease inhibitor (PI)- or cobicistat-containing ART. EFV+FTC+TDF was associated with reduced BMD and increased bone turnover markers, but BMD reductions were less than with PI-containing ART. No treatment-related bone fractures were identified.
CONCLUSIONS
EFV+FTC+TDF appeared to have a more favorable renal safety profile than TDF administered with a PI or cobicistat. BMD decreased with EFV+FTC+TDF, but no treatment-related fractures were identified.
Topics: Alkynes; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Bone Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclopropanes; Drug Interactions; Emtricitabine; HIV Infections; Humans; Incidence; Kidney Diseases; Tenofovir; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27809711
DOI: 10.1080/15284336.2016.1243363 -
International Journal of Infectious... Aug 2014Antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduces the morbidity and mortality of patients infected with HIV. Standard ART includes either nevirapine or efavirenz, however the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduces the morbidity and mortality of patients infected with HIV. Standard ART includes either nevirapine or efavirenz, however the efficacy of these drugs is limited in patients receiving rifampin treatment for tuberculosis (TB). We compared the efficacy and safety of nevirapine- and efavirenz-based ART regimens in patients co-infected with both HIV and TB through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
A comprehensive search of the literature was carried out to identify clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of nevirapine- and efavirenz-based ART regimens in HIV-associated TB. Eligible clinical studies included at least one primary or secondary event; the primary event was virological response and secondary events were TB treatment outcomes, mortality, and safety profile.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis compared five randomized clinical trials and four retrospective clinical trials. Both included patients co-infected with HIV and TB; 833 received nevirapine, while 1424 received efavirenz. The proportion of patients achieving a virological response by the end of the follow-up was higher in the efavirenz group: plasma viral load <400 copies/ml, risk ratio (RR) 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.17 (p = 0.004); plasma viral load<50 copies/ml, RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.98-1.16 (p = 0.146). No significant differences were found in either mortality (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.44-1.13, p = 0.142) or TB treatment outcomes (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96-1.06, p = 0.766). Due to adverse advents, nevirapine-based regimens significantly increased the risk of discontinuation of assigned ART (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.81, p = 0.009).
CONCLUSIONS
Although efavirenz-based ART was associated with more satisfactory virological outcomes, nevirapine-based ART could be considered an acceptable alternative for patients for whom efavirenz cannot be administered.
Topics: Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Antitubercular Agents; Benzoxazines; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Clinical Trials as Topic; Coinfection; Cyclopropanes; HIV Infections; Humans; Nevirapine; Rifampin; Treatment Outcome; Tuberculosis; Viral Load
PubMed: 24911886
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.04.020 -
The Lancet. HIV Nov 2016New antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens for HIV could improve clinical outcomes for patients. To inform global guidelines, we aimed to assess the comparative... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
New antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens for HIV could improve clinical outcomes for patients. To inform global guidelines, we aimed to assess the comparative effectiveness of recommended ART regimens for HIV in ART-naive patients.
METHODS
For this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched for randomised clinical trials published up to July 5, 2015, comparing recommended antiretroviral regimens in treatment-naive adults and adolescents (aged 12 years or older) with HIV. We extracted data on trial and patient characteristics, and the following primary outcomes: viral suppression, mortality, AIDS defining illnesses, discontinuations, discontinuations due to adverse events, and serious adverse events. We synthesised data using network meta-analyses in a Bayesian framework and included older treatments, such as indinavir, to serve as connecting nodes. We defined network nodes in terms of specific antivirals rather than specific ART regimens. We categorised backbone regimens and adjusted for them through group-specific meta-regression. We used the GRADE framework to interpret the strength of inference.
FINDINGS
We identified 5865 citations through database searches and other sources, of which, 126 articles related to 71 unique trials were included in the network analysis, including 34 032 patients randomly assigned to 161 treatment groups. For viral suppression at 48 weeks, compared with efavirenz, the odds ratio (OR) for viral suppression was 1·87 (95% credible interval [CrI] 1·34-2·64) with dolutegravir and 1·40 (1·02-1·96) with raltegravir; with respect to viral suppression, low-dose efavirenz was similar to all other treatments. Both low-dose efavirenz and integrase strand transfer inhibitors tended to be protective of discontinuations due to adverse events relative to normal-dose efavirenz. The most protective effect relative to efavirenz in network meta-analyses was that of dolutegravir (OR 0·26, 95% CrI 0·14-0·47), followed by low-dose efavirenz (0·39, 0·16-0·92). Owing to insufficient data, we could make no conclusions about serious adverse events. Low event rates also limited the quality of evidence with regard to mortality and AIDS defining illnesses.
INTERPRETATION
The efficacy and safety of ART has substantially improved with the introduction of newer drug classes of antiretrovirals that are now available to patients and HIV care providers. Their improved tolerance could be part of a larger solution to improve retention, which is a challenge, particularly in low-income and middle-income country settings.
FUNDING
The World Health Organization.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Anti-Retroviral Agents; Bayes Theorem; Benzoxazines; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; HIV Integrase Inhibitors; HIV-1; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Oxazines; Piperazines; Pyridones; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Viral Load; Young Adult
PubMed: 27658869
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30091-1 -
Journal of the ASEAN Federation of... 2024This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the combination of curcumin and piperine supplementation on Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG), Homeostatic Model of Insulin... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Effects of Combination of Curcumin and Piperine Supplementation on Glycemic Profile in Patients with Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the combination of curcumin and piperine supplementation on Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG), Homeostatic Model of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), and Body Mass Index (BMI) in patients with prediabetes and type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). This review was done to identify potential herbal remedies that may help improve glycemic parameters, leading to better health outcomes in combination with current antidiabetic treatment.
METHODOLOGY
This systematic review was based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). It was conducted in 2023 with sources and databases from MEDLINE, EBSCO-Host, ScienceDirect and ProQuest. This paper included randomized-controlled trials exploring the effects of the combination of curcumin and piperine on patients with prediabetes and T2DM. Systematic reviews, observational studies, case reports, case series, conference abstracts, book sections, commentaries/editorials, non-human studies and articles with unavailable full-text and written in non-English language, were excluded. The key terms for the literature search were "curcumin," "piperine," "prediabetes" and "Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus." We use Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) 2 for quality assessment of the included studies and Review Manager (RevMan) 5.4 to do the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
A total of three studies were included in this systematic review. Two studies from Neta et al., and Cicero et al., showed no significant difference in HOMA-IR, BMI and FPG levels between the curcumin, piperine and placebo groups. One study from Panahi et al. demonstrated a significant difference in BMI levels between the curcumin and piperine and placebo groups ( <0.01). The meta-analysis showed that FPG levels, HOMA-IR and BMI improved among patients with diabetes given in curcumin and piperine with reported mean differences (MD) of = -7.61, 95% CI [-15.26, 0.03], = 0.05, MD = -0.36, 95% CI [-0.77 to 0.05], = 0.09, and MD = -0.41, 95% CI [-0.85 to 0.03], = 0.07, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
The supplementation of curcumin and piperine showed a numerical reduction in FPG, HOMA-IR and BMI, but were not statistically significant. Further research is needed as there is a paucity of studies included in the review.
Topics: Humans; Alkaloids; Benzodioxoles; Blood Glucose; Curcumin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dietary Supplements; Drug Therapy, Combination; Insulin Resistance; Piperidines; Polyunsaturated Alkamides; Prediabetic State
PubMed: 38863920
DOI: 10.15605/jafes.039.01.18 -
AIDS (London, England) Mar 2014Primate studies and some observational human data have raised concern regarding an association of first-trimester efavirenz exposure with central nervous system... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Primate studies and some observational human data have raised concern regarding an association of first-trimester efavirenz exposure with central nervous system congenital anomalies. The objective of this review is to update evidence on efavirenz safety in HIV-infected pregnant women to inform revision of the 2013 WHO guidelines for antiretroviral therapy in low and middle-income countries.
DESIGN
A systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
We searched for studies reporting birth outcomes among women exposed to efavirenz during the first trimester of pregnancy up to 10 January 2014. Relative risks of congenital anomalies comparing women exposed to efavirenz and nonefavirenz-based antiretroviral regimens were pooled using random effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies were included in this review, among which 21 reported the birth outcomes of 2026 live births among women exposed to efavirenz during the first trimester of pregnancy. Forty-four congenital anomalies were reported, giving a pooled proportion of 1.63% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.78-2.48], with only one neural tube defect. Twelve studies reported birth outcomes of women exposed to efavirenz or nonefavirenz-containing regimens during the first trimester of pregnancy. Pooled analysis found no differences in overall risks congenital anomalies between these two groups (relative risk 0.78, 95% CI 0.56-1.08). The incidence of neural tube defects was low, 0.05% (95% CI <0.01-0.28), and similar to incidence in the general population.
DISCUSSION
This updated analysis found no evidence of an increased risk of overall or central nervous system congenital anomalies associated with first-trimester exposure to efavirenz, similar to previous systematic reviews. This review contributed to the evidence base for the revised 2013 WHO guidelines on antiretroviral therapy, which recommend that efavirenz can be included as part of first-line therapy in adults regardless of sex, and that it can be used throughout pregnancy, including during the first trimester. However, because of the low incidence of central nervous system anomalies in the overall population and relatively small number of exposures in the current literature, continued birth outcomes prospective surveillance is warranted.
Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Alkynes; Benzoxazines; Central Nervous System Diseases; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24849471
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000000231 -
Systematic Reviews Aug 2017The effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy (ART) depends on the choice of regimens during initiation. Most evidences from developed countries indicated that there is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Choice of initial antiretroviral drugs and treatment outcomes among HIV-infected patients in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
BACKGROUND
The effectiveness of antiretroviral therapy (ART) depends on the choice of regimens during initiation. Most evidences from developed countries indicated that there is difference between efavirenz (EFV) and nevirapine (NVP). However, the evidences are limited in resource poor countries particularly in Africa. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out to summarize reported long-term treatment outcomes among people on first line therapy in sub-Saharan Africa.
METHODS
Observational studies that reported odds ratio, relative risk, hazard ratio, or standardized incidence ratio to compare risk of treatment failure among HIV/AIDS patients who initiated ART with EFV versus NVP were systematically searched. Searches were conducted using the MEDLINE database within PubMed, Google Scholar, HINARI, and Research Gates between 2007 and 2016. Information was extracted using standardized form. Pooled risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effect, generic inverse variance method.
RESULT
A total of 6394 articles were identified, of which, 29 were eligible for review and abstraction in sub-Saharan Africa. Seventeen articles were used for the meta-analysis. Of a total of 121,092 independent study participants, 76,719 (63.36%) were females. Of these, 40,480 (33.43%) initiated with NVP containing regimen. Two studies did not report the median CD4 cell counts at initiation. Patients who have low CD4 cell counts initiated with EFV containing regimen. The pooled effect size indicated that treatment failure was reduced by 15%, 0.85 (95%CI: 0.75-0.98), and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) switch was reduced by 43%, 0.57 (95%CI: 0.37-0.89).
CONCLUSION
The risk of treatment failure and NNRTI switch were lower in patients who initiated with EFV than NVP-containing regimen. The review suggests that initiation of patients with EFV-containing regimen will reduce treatment failure and NNRTI switch.
Topics: Africa South of the Sahara; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; Humans; Incidence; Nevirapine; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28841912
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-017-0567-7 -
AIDS (London, England) Jun 2013Since 2002, the WHO has recommended either nevirapine (NVP) or efavirenz (EFV) as part of first-line antiretroviral therapy. These two drugs are known to have differing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Since 2002, the WHO has recommended either nevirapine (NVP) or efavirenz (EFV) as part of first-line antiretroviral therapy. These two drugs are known to have differing toxicity profiles, but the risk of these toxicities overall is not well established.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed adverse events among treatment-naive HIV-positive adults and children receiving either NVP or EFV as part of first-line antiretroviral therapy. The primary outcome was drug discontinuation as a result of any adverse event; specific toxicities were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated and proportions and odds ratios (ORs) pooled using fixed-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
We reviewed data on 26,446 adults and 3975 children from eight randomized trials and 26 prospective cohorts. Overall, adults on NVP were more than two times more likely to discontinue treatment due to any adverse event compared to patients on EFV (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.9-2.6). Severe hepatotoxicity (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.5-4.2), severe skin toxicity (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.5-5.4), and severe hypersensitivity reactions (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.9-2.9) were more likely to occur among patients on NVP. Patients receiving EFV were more likely to experience severe central nervous system events (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.1-5.4). Similar associations were seen in children.
DISCUSSION
Compared to NVP, EFV is associated with a lower frequency of severe adverse events, in particular treatment discontinuations. This finding supports a move toward EFV-based therapy as the preferred first-line treatment regimen for HIV treatment within a public health approach.
Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Child; Cyclopropanes; HIV Infections; Humans; Nevirapine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
PubMed: 23343913
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32835f1db0 -
PloS One 2015Efavirenz, a non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) is one of the most commonly prescribed antiretroviral drugs. The present article provides a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Efavirenz, a non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) is one of the most commonly prescribed antiretroviral drugs. The present article provides a systematic overview and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing efavirenz and other active drugs currently recommended for treatment of HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive patients. Electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Trip Database) were searched up till 23 December 2013 for randomized controlled clinical trials published as a peer-reviewed papers, and concerning efavirenz-based regimens used as initial treatment for HIV infection. Thirty-four studies were included in the systematic review, while twenty-six trials were suitable for the meta-analysis. Efavirenz was compared with drugs from four different classes: NNRTIs other than efavirenz (nevirapine or rilpivirine), integrase strand transfer inhibitors (InSTIs), ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors (bPI) and chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 5 (CCR5) antagonists (maraviroc), all of them were added to the background regimen. Results of the current meta-analysis showed that efavirenz-based regimens were equally effective as other recommended regimens based on NNRTI, ritonavir-boosted PI or CCR5 antagonist in terms of efficacy outcomes (disease progression and/or death, plasma viral HIV RNA <50 copies/ml) while statistically significant more patients treated with InSTI achieved plasma viral load <50 copies/ml at week 48. In comparison with both InSTI-based and CCR5-based therapy, efavirenz-based treatment was associated with a higher risk of therapy discontinuation due to adverse events. However, comparisons of efevirenz-based treatment with InSTI-based and CCR5-based therapy were based on a limited number of trials, therefore, conclusions from these two comparisons must be confirmed in further reliable randomized controlled studies. Results of our meta-analysis support the present clinical guidelines for antiretroviral-naive, HIV-infected patients, in which efavirenz is one of the most preferred regimens in the analyzed population. Beneficial safety profile of InSTI-based and CCR5-based therapy over efavirenz-based treatment needs further studies.
Topics: Adult; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, CCR5; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25933004
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124279 -
AIDS and Behavior Feb 2017Poor adherence remains a major barrier to achieving the clinical and public health benefits of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs). A systematic review and qualitative... (Review)
Review
Poor adherence remains a major barrier to achieving the clinical and public health benefits of antiretroviral drugs (ARVs). A systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis was conduct to evaluate how ARV adverse drug reactions may influence ARV adherence. Thirty-nine articles were identified, and 33 reported that ARV adverse drug reactions decreased adherence and six studies found no influence. Visually noticeable adverse drug reactions and psychological adverse reactions were reported as more likely to cause non-adherence compared to other adverse drug reactions. Six studies reported a range of adverse reactions associated with EFV-containing regimens contributing to decreased adherence. Informing HIV-infected individuals about ARV adverse drug reactions prior to initiation, counselling about coping mechanisms, and experiencing the effectiveness of ARVs on wellbeing may improve ARV adherence.
Topics: Adaptation, Psychological; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Counseling; Cyclopropanes; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; HIV Infections; Humans; Medication Adherence; Qualitative Research
PubMed: 27613645
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-016-1545-0 -
AIDS (London, England) Nov 2011Evidence of the risk of birth defects with efavirenz use is limited. We updated a meta-analysis of birth defects in infants with first trimester efavirenz exposure up to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Evidence of the risk of birth defects with efavirenz use is limited. We updated a meta-analysis of birth defects in infants with first trimester efavirenz exposure up to July 2011. In 21 studies, there were 39 defects among live births in 1437 women receiving first trimester efavirenz [2.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-3.18]. The relative risk of defects comparing women on efavirenz-based (1290 live births) and nonefavirenz-based regimens (8122 live births) was 0.85 (95% CI 0.61-1.20). One neural tube defect was observed (myelomeningocele), giving an incidence of 0.07% (95% CI 0.002-0.39).
Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Alkynes; Anti-HIV Agents; Benzoxazines; Cyclopropanes; Female; HIV Infections; Humans; Incidence; Neural Tube Defects; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 21918421
DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834cdb71