-
Clinical Cardiology Jul 2021The cardiovascular safety of febuxostat compared to allopurinol for the treatment of gout remains equivocal. Febuxostat had a better safety outcome compared with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The cardiovascular safety of febuxostat compared to allopurinol for the treatment of gout remains equivocal. Febuxostat had a better safety outcome compared with allopurinol. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE and Embase for articles published between March 1, 2000 and April 4, 2021, without any language restrictions. We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of included clinical trials to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of febuxostat compared to allopurinol for treatment of chronic gout. Two reviewers independently selected studies, assessed study quality, and extracted data. Risk ratios were calculated with random effects and were reported with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). From 240 potentially relevant citations, 224 papers were excluded; 16 studies were ultimately included in the analysis. Febuxostat had a better safety outcome compared with allopurinol,which was the composite of urgent coronary revascularization (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.77-0.90, p < .0001) and stroke (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.97, p = .009). However, that difference was not found in nonfatal myocardial infarction (OR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.80-1.22, p = .91), cardiovascular related mortality (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.69-1.38, p = .89) and all-cause mortality (OR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.75-1.15, p = .52). No significant differences in cardiovascular related mortality and all-cause mortality were observed across any subgroup. This meta-analysis adds new evidence regarding the cardiovascular safety of febuxostat in patients. Initiation of febuxostat in patients was not associated with an increased risk of death or serious cardiovascular related adverse events compared with allopurinol.
Topics: Allopurinol; Febuxostat; Gout; Gout Suppressants; Humans; Hyperuricemia; Myocardial Infarction
PubMed: 34013998
DOI: 10.1002/clc.23643 -
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases Jan 2017New drugs and new evidence concerning the use of established treatments have become available since the publication of the first European League Against Rheumatism... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
New drugs and new evidence concerning the use of established treatments have become available since the publication of the first European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of gout, in 2006. This situation has prompted a systematic review and update of the 2006 recommendations.
METHODS
The EULAR task force consisted of 15 rheumatologists, 1 radiologist, 2 general practitioners, 1 research fellow, 2 patients and 3 experts in epidemiology/methodology from 12 European countries. A systematic review of the literature concerning all aspects of gout treatments was performed. Subsequently, recommendations were formulated by use of a Delphi consensus approach.
RESULTS
Three overarching principles and 11 key recommendations were generated. For the treatment of flare, colchicine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), oral or intra-articular steroids or a combination are recommended. In patients with frequent flare and contraindications to colchicine, NSAIDs and corticosteroids, an interleukin-1 blocker should be considered. In addition to education and a non-pharmacological management approach, urate-lowering therapy (ULT) should be considered from the first presentation of the disease, and serum uric acid (SUA) levels should be maintained at<6 mg/dL (360 µmol/L) and <5 mg/dL (300 µmol/L) in those with severe gout. Allopurinol is recommended as first-line ULT and its dosage should be adjusted according to renal function. If the SUA target cannot be achieved with allopurinol, then febuxostat, a uricosuric or combining a xanthine oxidase inhibitor with a uricosuric should be considered. For patients with refractory gout, pegloticase is recommended.
CONCLUSIONS
These recommendations aim to inform physicians and patients about the non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments for gout and to provide the best strategies to achieve the predefined urate target to cure the disease.
Topics: Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Delphi Technique; Directive Counseling; Evidence-Based Medicine; Gout; Gout Suppressants; Humans; Interleukin-1; Life Style; Patient Education as Topic; Symptom Flare Up; Uric Acid
PubMed: 27457514
DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209707 -
BMC Nephrology Jun 2022Asymptomatic hyperuricemia was found to be associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk but the potential benefits of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) remain... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Asymptomatic hyperuricemia was found to be associated with increased cardiovascular disease risk but the potential benefits of urate-lowering therapy (ULT) remain controversial. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) with frequentist model to estimate the efficacy and safety of ULT in asymptomatic hyperuricemia.
METHODS
MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) of adults with asymptomatic hyperuricemia were eligible if they compared any pair of ULTs (i.e., allopurinol, febuxostat, probenecid, benzbromarone, sulfinpyrazone, rasburicase, lesinurad, and topiroxostat) and placebo or no ULT, and had outcomes of interest, including composite renal events, major adverse cardiovascular events, serum urate levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), systolic blood pressure, and adverse events.
RESULTS
NMA with frequentist approach was applied to estimate relative treatment effects, i.e., risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD). A total of 23 RCTs were eligible. NMA identified beneficial effects of ULT on composite renal events and eGFR but not for other outcomes. Allopurinol and febuxostat had significantly lower composite renal events than placebo (RR 0.39, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23 to 0.66, and RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.99, respectively). Both treatments also resulted in significantly higher eGFR than placebo (MD 3.69 ml/min/1.73 m, 95% CI 1.31 to 6.08, and MD 2.89 ml/min/1.73 m, 95% CI 0.69 to 5.09, respectively). No evidence of inconsistency was identified.
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence suggests that allopurinol and febuxostat are the ULTs of choice in reducing composite renal events and improving renal function.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
This study was registered with PROSPERO: CRD42019145908. The date of the first registration was 12 November 2019.
Topics: Adult; Allopurinol; Febuxostat; Gout; Gout Suppressants; Humans; Hyperuricemia; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Uric Acid
PubMed: 35739495
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-022-02850-3 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022Gout is a common disease and is usually treated with uric acid-lowering drugs (the most commonly used of which are febuxostat and allopurinol). However, the...
Gout is a common disease and is usually treated with uric acid-lowering drugs (the most commonly used of which are febuxostat and allopurinol). However, the cardiovascular safety of febuxostat and allopurinol is still controversial. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of the two drugs in patients with gout using one-stage and two-stage meta-analysis. PubMed, Embase, CBM, CNKI, WanFang, Central, and VIP were searched from inception to 30 January 2022. Randomized controlled trials which evaluated the cardiovascular safety of febuxostat or allopurinol for treating patients with gout were included. Based on the Kaplan-Meier curves of the two studies, individual patient data (IPD) were extracted and reconstructed. We used time-varying risk ratios (RRs) to summarize time-to-event outcomes, and the RRs of MACE incidence, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality were calculated by a multi-level flexible hazard regression model in 1-stage meta-analyses. values were calculated using a log-rank test. At the same time, using the reconstructed IPD, we performed 2-stage meta-analyses to inform the quantitative estimates of time-specific relative risks at the six time points (1 , 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 years) based on a random-effects model. Two RCTs with 12,318 participants were included. In the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events between the two regimens, there was no significant difference [RR = 0.99 (95% CI, 0.89-1.11), = 0.87]; at the same time, there was no significant difference in cardiovascular mortality [RR = 1.17 (95% CI, 0.98-1.40), = 0.08] or all-cause mortality [RR = 1.03 (95% CI, 0.91-1.17), = 0.62]. In terms of 2-stage meta-analyses, there was no significant difference in any outcomes at any time point (moderate-to low-certainty evidence). In patients without atherosclerotic disease, febuxostat likely has a similar cardiovascular profile to allopurinol. However, in patients with a history of cardiovascular disease, allopurinol treatment is associated with less cardiovascular mortality as compared with febuxostat. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#loginpage, identifier PROSPERO, CRD42022325656.
PubMed: 36249825
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.998441 -
Cardiovascular Therapeutics Aug 2018Oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction are two inter-related conditions commonly seen in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. The enzyme, xanthine oxidase,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
Oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction are two inter-related conditions commonly seen in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. The enzyme, xanthine oxidase, is an important contributor to these phenomena but to a variable degree in different patient populations. This meta-analysis will summarize the effect of allopurinol, an established xanthine oxidase inhibitor, on endothelial function among patients with different comorbidities.
METHODS
Medline Complete, PubMed, ProQuest, ClinicalKey, Wiley Online Library, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched till July 29, 2017. Meta-analysis was planned for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated allopurinol effects on endothelial function. A random effect model was used to calculate the standardized mean difference (with 95% confidence intervals: CI) as an estimate of effect size. Heterogeneity was quantified by four types of information: Q statistics, I statistic, Tau-squared (T ), and Tau (T).
RESULTS
Thirty eligible studies were identified; 12 were included in the final analysis and subdivided among 3 patient's groups: patients with chronic heart failure (CHF; 197 patients), patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD; 183 patients), and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM; 170 patients). Allopurinol was found to have a statistically significant benefit on endothelial function in patients with CHF and CKD but not in type 2 DM. The standardized mean differences and CI in the three patient's groups were 0.776 (0.429, 1.122), 0.350 (0.009, 0.690), and 1.331 (-0.781, 3.444), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Allopurinol has an antioxidant property that might partially reverse endothelial dysfunction in patients with certain comorbidities. The importance of this property and the magnitude of the beneficial effect are likely to be related to the relative contribution of xanthine oxidase into the oxidative stress associated with different underlying pathologies.
Topics: Aged; Allopurinol; Antioxidants; Cardiovascular Diseases; Comorbidity; Endothelium, Vascular; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Oxidative Stress; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Xanthine Oxidase
PubMed: 29673103
DOI: 10.1111/1755-5922.12432 -
Allopurinol to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS One 2021To compare the effectiveness of allopurinol with no treatment or placebo for the prevention of cardiovascular events in hyperuricemic patients. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
To compare the effectiveness of allopurinol with no treatment or placebo for the prevention of cardiovascular events in hyperuricemic patients.
METHODS AND RESULTS
Pubmed, Web of Science and Cochrane library were searched from inception until July 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational studies in hyperuricemic patients without significant renal disease and treated with allopurinol, versus placebo or no treatment were included. Outcome measures were cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or a combined endpoint (CM/MI/S). For RCT's a random effects meta-analysis was performed. For observational studies a narrative synthesis was performed. Of the original 1995 references we ultimately included 26 RCT's and 21 observational studies. We found a significantly reduced risk of combined endpoint (Risk Ratio 0.65 [95% CI] [0.46 to 0.91]; p = 0.012) and myocardial infarction (RR 0.47 [0.27 to 0.80]; p = 0.01) in the allopurinol group compared to controls. We found no significant effect of allopurinol on stroke or cardiovascular mortality. Of the 15 observational studies with sufficient quality, allopurinol was associated with reduced cardiovascular mortality in 1 out of 3 studies that reported this outcome, myocardial infarction in 6 out of 8, stroke in 4 out of 7, and combined end-point in 2 out of 2. Cardiovascular benefit was only observed when allopurinol therapy was prolonged for more than 6 months and when an appropriate allopurinol dose was administered (300 mg or more/day) or sufficient reduction of serum urate concentration was achieved (<0.36 mmol/l).
CONCLUSIONS
Data from RCT's and observational studies indicate that allopurinol treatment reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with hyperuricemia. However, the quality of evidence from RCTs is low to moderate. To establish whether allopurinol lowers the risk of cardiovascular events a well-designed and adequately powered randomized, placebo-controlled trial is needed in high-risk patients with hyperuricemia.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO registration CRD42018089744.
Topics: Allopurinol; Antimetabolites; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Morbidity; Prognosis; Survival Rate
PubMed: 34855873
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260844 -
Efficacy of Allopurinol in Improving Endothelial Dysfunction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular... Nov 2023Endothelial dysfunction has been implicated in various cardiovascular disorders as the initial pathology. Allopurinol has been shown to improve endothelial dysfunction... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Endothelial dysfunction has been implicated in various cardiovascular disorders as the initial pathology. Allopurinol has been shown to improve endothelial dysfunction in patients with gout, but its effect on cardiovascular patients is unclear.
AIMS
We aim to assess allopurinol efficacy in improving endothelial dysfunction overall and in different disease states including but not limited to heart failure, chronic kidney disease, ischemic heart disease METHODS: We conducted a literature search of PubMed, Cochrane's Central Library, and Scopus until December 2022, including randomized controlled trials and double-arm observational studies. The primary outcome measure was endothelial function assessed by change in flow mediated dilation (FMD) RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 22 studies with a total of 1472 patients. Our pooled analysis shows that allopurinol significantly improved FMD (WMD = 1.46%, 95% CI [0.70, 2.22], p < 0.01) compared to control. However, there was no significant difference between allopurinol and control for endothelial-independent vasodilation measured by forearm blood flow (WMD = 0.10%, 95% CI [- 0.89, 0.69], p = 0.80). Subgroup analysis indicated that the effect of allopurinol on FMD was more significant in diabetic and congestive heart failure patients.
CONCLUSION
While allopurinol may improve endothelial function in various patient populations, further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to determine its efficacy in preventing cardiovascular disease exacerbation.
Topics: Humans; Allopurinol; Endothelium, Vascular; Vascular Diseases; Vasodilation; Cardiovascular Diseases
PubMed: 38070035
DOI: 10.1007/s40292-023-00615-z -
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk... 2023This study aims to systematically review the hepatic safety of febuxostat and allopurinol in adult gout patients. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
This study aims to systematically review the hepatic safety of febuxostat and allopurinol in adult gout patients.
METHODS
We searched for information using the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. The inclusion criteria were to review all randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compared allopurinol and febuxostat for adult gout patients that had an assessment of liver function outcomes. Non-English studies on case reports, case series, reviews, and abstracts only were excluded. We extracted information from the studies to answer the research question, ie, study design, publication year, population, sample size, patient characterization, duration, Jadad score, and liver function outcomes.
RESULTS
We screened 512 publications from the databases and identified 11 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Ten out of 11 included studies were double-blind RCTs. In the majority of the included studies, no statistically significant differences were observed in terms of hepatic safety data between febuxostat and allopurinol. However, in studies where allopurinol titration was used, it posed a challenge to maintain blinding. Notably, consistent adverse events related to liver function findings were observed across all reviewed RCTs. These abnormal liver function test results sometimes led to study withdrawal based on the investigators' assessment. Nevertheless, the investigators classified most liver function test elevations as mild to moderate in severity.
CONCLUSION
Our analysis concluded that adult gout patients enrolled in the included RCTs exhibited similar hepatic safety profiles for both febuxostat and allopurinol treatment. Liver function abnormalities were identified in all RCTs included in this systematic review. Consequently, it is important for the product labeling information of both allopurinol and febuxostat to present and describe the current safety data to guide healthcare practitioners when prescribing these medications to patients. Pharmacovigilance and post-marketing pharmacoepidemiology data are essential in establishing the comprehensive safety profile.
PubMed: 37744559
DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S424598 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery :... Nov 2023This systematic review explored different medications and methods for prevention and treatment of pouchitis after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review explored different medications and methods for prevention and treatment of pouchitis after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA).
METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for randomized clinical trials that assessed prevention or treatment of pouchitis. The systematic review was reported in line with updated 2020 PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias in the trials included was assessed using the ROB-2 tool and certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. The main outcomes were the incidence of new pouchitis episodes in the preventative studies and resolution or improvement of active pouchitis in the treatment studies.
RESULTS
Fifteen randomized trials were included. A meta-analysis of 7 trials on probiotics revealed significantly lower odds of pouchitis with the use of probiotics (RR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.16-0.42, I = 20%, p < 0.001) and similar odds of adverse effects to placebo (RR: 2.43, 95% CI: 0.11-55.9, I = 0, p = 0.579). One trial investigated the prophylactic role of allopurinol in preventing pouchitis and found a comparable incidence of pouchitis in the two groups (31% vs 28%; p = 0.73). Seven trials assessed different treatments for active pouchitis. One recorded the resolution of pouchitis in all patients treated with ciprofloxacin versus 67% treated with metronidazole. Both budesonide enema and oral metronidazole were associated with similar significant improvement in pouchitis (58.3% vs 50%, p = 0.67). Rifaximin, adalimumab, fecal microbiota transplantation, and bismuth carbomer foam enema were not effective in treating pouchitis.
CONCLUSIONS
Probiotics are effective in preventing pouchitis after IPAA. Antibiotics, including ciprofloxacin and metronidazole, are likely effective in treating active pouchitis.
Topics: Humans; Pouchitis; Metronidazole; Colitis, Ulcerative; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Proctocolectomy, Restorative; Ciprofloxacin; Anastomosis, Surgical
PubMed: 37815701
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05841-3 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Dec 2023Renal safety risk is currently an important factor that hinders the development of uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1) inhibitors. This study aimed to compare the renal...
OBJECTIVE
Renal safety risk is currently an important factor that hinders the development of uric acid transporter 1 (URAT1) inhibitors. This study aimed to compare the renal safety and uric acid-lowering efficacy of different URAT1 inhibitors and clarify the association between them.
METHODS
A systematic review of published randomized controlled trials on URAT1 inhibitors was conducted to investigate the incidence of renal safety events. A model-based analysis was performed to predict the uric acid-lowering efficacy of representative URAT1 inhibitors.
RESULTS
The overall renal safety event incidences of lesinurad, verinurad, dotinurad, SHR4640, and benzbromarone in patients with hyperuricemia were 11.2 % (142/1264), 12.0 % (34/284), 0.5 % (2/421), 2.3 % (5/213), and 1.3 % (5/393), respectively. A semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model was used to establish the dose-exposure-effect relationship of lesinurad, verinurad, dotinurad, and SHR4640 with or without the combination of xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs). The efficacy ranking of the intermediate dose of URAT1 inhibitors with once-daily dosing was 2 mg dotinurad > 10 mg verinurad > 5 mg SHR4640 > 400 mg lesinurad. The combination of 80 mg febuxostat and 600 mg allopurinol reduced the 24-h cumulative renal uric acid excretion by 48.4 % and 48.3 %, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Uric acid-lowering efficacy is not an independent factor for the renal safety risk of different URAT1 inhibitors, and structural differences could be responsible for the difference. The adverse renal effects of URAT1 inhibitors are dose-dependent, and the combination with high doses of XOIs can significantly reduce the renal safety risk by reducing uric acid excretion by the kidneys.
PubMed: 37866004
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152279