-
Drugs & Aging Feb 2023Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can lead to medication-related harm, and the older population is at greatest risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) can lead to medication-related harm, and the older population is at greatest risk. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate DDI prevalence and identify common DDIs in older community-dwelling adults.
METHODS
PubMed and EMBASE were searched for observational studies published between 01/01/2010 and 10/05/2021 reporting DDI prevalence in community-dwelling individuals aged ≥ 65 years. Nursing home and inpatient hospital studies were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model with logit transformation. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Cochran's Q and I. DDI prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented. All analyses were performed in R (version 4.1.2).
RESULTS
There were 5144 unique articles identified. Thirty-three studies involving 17,011,291 community-dwelling individuals aged ≥ 65 years met inclusion criteria. Thirty-one studies reported DDI prevalence at the study-participant level, estimates ranged from 0.8% to 90.6%. The pooled DDI prevalence was 28.8% (95% CI 19.3-40.7), with significant heterogeneity (p < 0.10; I = 100%; tau = 2.13) largely explained by the different DDI identification methods. Therefore, 26 studies were qualitatively synthesised and seven studies were eligible for separate meta-analyses. In a meta-analysis of three studies (N = 1122) using Micromedex, pooled DDI prevalence was 57.8% (95% CI 52.2-63.2; I = 69.6%, p < 0.01). In a meta-analysis of two studies (N = 809,113) using Lexi-Interact, pooled DDI prevalence was 30.3% (95% CI 30.2-30.4; I = 6.8%). In a meta-analysis of two studies (N = 947) using the 2015 American Geriatrics Society Beers criteria, pooled DDI prevalence was 16.6% (95% CI 5.6-40.2; I = 97.5%, p < 0.01). Common DDIs frequently involved cardiovascular drugs, including ACE inhibitor-potassium-sparing diuretic; amiodarone-digoxin; and amiodarone-warfarin.
CONCLUSIONS
DDIs are prevalent among older community-dwelling individuals; however, the methodology used to estimate these events varies considerably. A standardised methodology is needed to allow meaningful measurement and comparison of DDI prevalence.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Independent Living; Prevalence; Drug Interactions; Nursing Homes; Skilled Nursing Facilities
PubMed: 36692678
DOI: 10.1007/s40266-022-01001-5 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Dec 2010Pulseless ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation are the main causes of sudden cardiac death, but other ventricular tachyarrhythmias can occur without... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Pulseless ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation are the main causes of sudden cardiac death, but other ventricular tachyarrhythmias can occur without haemodynamic compromise. Ventricular arrhythmias occur mainly as a result of myocardial ischaemia or cardiomyopathies, so risk factors are those of cardiovascular disease.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of electrical therapies for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest associated with ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation? What are the effects of antiarrhythmic drug treatments for use in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest associated with shock-resistant ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation? What are the effects of treatments for comatose survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest associated with ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to February 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 15 systematic reviews and RCTs that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: amiodarone, bretylium, defibrillation, lidocaine, procainamide, and therapeutic hypothermia.
Topics: Amiodarone; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Electric Countershock; Humans; Hypothermia, Induced; Lidocaine; Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest; Ventricular Fibrillation
PubMed: 21418694
DOI: No ID Found -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2022Double sequential external defibrillation (DSED) in cardiopulmonary resuscitation has shown different results in comparison with standard defibrillation in the treatment...
INTRODUCTION
Double sequential external defibrillation (DSED) in cardiopulmonary resuscitation has shown different results in comparison with standard defibrillation in the treatment of refractory ventricular fibrillation (RVF). This review aims to compare the advantages of DSED with standard defibrillation in the treatment of refractory ventricular fibrillation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 1, 2022. Studies included adult patients who developed RVF. The study used random-effects and fixed-effects models for meta-analysis, which was reported by risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), mean difference (MD), or standardized mean difference (SMD). The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the Robins-I tool for observational studies and the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (ROB-2) tool for clinical trials. Primary outcomes included the termination of RVF, prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge, and good neurological recovery. Secondary outcomes included age, total defibrillation attempts, emergency medical system arrival time, and dose of epinephrine and amiodarone used.
RESULTS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, 10 studies containing 1347 patients with available data on treatment outcomes were included. The pooled estimate was (RR 1.03, 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.19; = 0.42, = 0.678 > 0.05) for Termination of RVF, (RR 0.84, 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.11; = 1.23, = 0.219 > 0.05) for ROSC, (RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.06; = 1.4, = 0.162 > 0.05) for survival to hospital admission, (RR 0.77, 95%CI, 0.52 to 1.15; = 1.26, = 0.206 > 0.05) for survival to hospital discharge, (RR 0.65, 95%CI, 0.35 to 1.22; = 1.33, = 0.184 > 0.05) for good neurologic recovery, (MD -1.01, 95%CI, -3.07 to 1.06; = 0.96, = 0.34 > 0.05) for age, (MD 2.27, 95%CI, 1.80 to 2.73; = 9.50, = 0.001 < 0.05) for total defibrillation attempts, (MD 1.10, 95%CI, -0.45 to 66; = 1.39, = 0.16 > 0.05) for emergency medical system arrival time, (SMD 0.34, 95%CI, 0.17 to 0.50; = 4.04, = 0.001 < 0.05) for epinephrine, and (SMD -0.30, 95%CI, -0.65 to -0.05; = 1.66, = 0.1 > 0.05) for amiodarone.
CONCLUSION
We discovered no differences between DSED and standard defibrillation in termination of RVF, prehospital return of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital admission, survival to hospital discharge, good neurological outcome, emergency medical system arrival time, and amiodarone doses in patients with RVF. There were some differences in the number of defibrillations and epinephrine doses utilized during resuscitation.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=329354], identifier [CRD42022329354].
PubMed: 36505388
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1017935 -
Europace : European Pacing,... Oct 2022Our objective was to compare the efficacy of pre-treatment with different classes of anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
Our objective was to compare the efficacy of pre-treatment with different classes of anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing electrical cardioversion.
METHODS AND RESULTS
We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different AADs in patients with AF undergoing electrical cardioversion. We grouped AADs into five network nodes: no treatment or rate control, Class Ia, Class Ic, Class III, and amiodarone. Outcomes were (i) acute restoration and (ii) maintenance of sinus rhythm. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception until June 2020. We used Python 3.8.3 and R 3.6.2 for data analysis. We evaluated the overall certainty of evidence with the GRADE framework. We included 28 RCTs. Compared with no treatment or rate control, Class III AADs [odds ratio (OR): 2.41; 95% credible interval (CrI): 1.37 to 4.62, high certainty] and amiodarone (OR: 2.58; 95% CrI: 1.54 to 4.37, high certainty) improved restoration of sinus rhythm. Amiodarone improved long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm when compared with no treatment or rate control (OR: 5.37; 95% CrI: 4.00-7.39, high certainty), Class Ic (OR: 1.89; 95% CrI: 1.05-3.45, moderate certainty) and Class III AADs (OR: 2.19; 95% CrI: 1.39-3.26, high certainty).
CONCLUSION
Before electrical cardioversion of AF, treatment with Class III AADs or amiodarone improves the acute restoration of sinus rhythm. Amiodarone is most likely to improve the maintenance of sinus rhythm after electrical cardioversion, but Class Ic and Class III AADs are also effective.
Topics: Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Electric Countershock; Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35654763
DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac063 -
American Journal of Cardiovascular... Dec 2011Stroke is the most feared complication of atrial fibrillation (AF). Dronedarone is an antiarrhythmic drug with multichannel-blocking properties. Recently, a post hoc... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Stroke is the most feared complication of atrial fibrillation (AF). Dronedarone is an antiarrhythmic drug with multichannel-blocking properties. Recently, a post hoc analysis of a large randomized trial has suggested a reduction of stroke risk in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF receiving dronedarone.
OBJECTIVE
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of dronedarone on the occurrence of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Knowledge as well as abstracts of major conferences for randomized trials comparing dronedarone with placebo in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF. The endpoint was the occurrence of stroke or TIA during follow-up. Fixed effect risk differences (RDs) were calculated with the Mantel-Haenszel method. We also performed random effects analysis with the DerSimonian Laird method.
RESULTS
Four trials were included in the analysis; a total of 5967 patients were analyzed, 3183 receiving dronedarone 400 mg twice daily and 2784 receiving placebo. 160 strokes or TIAs were reported in the four trials: 67 in the dronedarone group (2.1%) and 93 in the placebo group (3.3%). In the fixed effect model, patients in the dronedarone group had a significantly lower risk for the occurrence of stroke or TIA during follow-up compared with patients in the placebo group. The RD of the incidence of stroke or TIA in all trials between patients randomized to dronedarone and those randomized to placebo was -0.0094 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.0178, -0.0011; p = 0.027). The ATHENA trial had by far the highest statistical weight (79.5%). There was no evidence of heterogeneity (χ2 = 2.41, p = 0.300). In the random effects model, the statistical weight of the ATHENA trial was much lower (45.1%) and the RD for stroke or TIA between the dronedarone and the placebo groups did not reach statistical significance (RD -0.0064, 95% CI -0.0144, 0.0016; p = 0.120).
LIMITATIONS
First, stroke was not a prespecified outcome measure in the included trials. Second, we did not analyze trials studying patients with permanent AF; very recent data show an adverse outcome in patients with permanent AF receiving dronedarone.
CONCLUSIONS
The meta-analysis indicates a reduced risk of stroke or TIA in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF receiving dronedarone. These findings are largely due to the results of the ATHENA trial. Further research on this topic is necessary.
Topics: Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Dronedarone; Humans; Incidence; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Models, Statistical; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke
PubMed: 22149318
DOI: 10.2165/11594200-000000000-00000 -
Current Problems in Cardiology Mar 2024The principal management of Amiodarone-induced-thyrotoxicosis (AIT) is balancing cardiac-thyroid conditions. However, the role of thyroidectomy is still contentious.... (Review)
Review
The principal management of Amiodarone-induced-thyrotoxicosis (AIT) is balancing cardiac-thyroid conditions. However, the role of thyroidectomy is still contentious. This systematic review aims to provide insights into the roles of thyroidectomy in the management of AIT. This systematic review encompasses 303 AIT patients who underwent thyroidectomy from 14 studies. The indication of thyroidectomy can be due to cardiac factors, thyrotoxicosis conditions, and patient-physician considerations. Thyroidectomy is more effective in improving thyroid hormone status, cardiac function, and mortality compared to optimal medical therapy, especially in those with left ventricular ejection fraction < 40 %. Thyroidectomy is effective in improving cardiac function and mortality due to shorter duration for achieving euthyroid. Thyroidectomy and medical therapy have comparable side effects. However, the identification of high-risk patients may reduce thyroidectomy complications. Thus, thyroidectomy should not be viewed as the last resource and should be performed immediately when indicated.
Topics: Humans; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Thyroidectomy; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left; Thyrotoxicosis; Heart Diseases
PubMed: 38232922
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102395 -
American Journal of Cardiovascular... Jul 2023Since atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the major arrhythmias managed in hospitals worldwide, it has a major impact on public health. The guidelines agree on the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Since atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the major arrhythmias managed in hospitals worldwide, it has a major impact on public health. The guidelines agree on the desirability of cardioverting paroxysmal AF episodes. This meta-analysis aims to answer the question of which antiarrhythmic agent is most effective in cardioverting a paroxysmal AF.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis, searching MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL, were performed, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling a population of unselected adult patients with a paroxysmal AF that compared at least two pharmacological regimes to restore the sinus rhythm or a cardioversion agent against a placebo. The main outcome was efficacy in restoring sinus rhythm.
RESULTS
Sixty-one RCTs (7988 patients) were included in the quantitative analysis [deviance information criterion (DIC) 272.57; I = 3%]. Compared with the placebo, the association verapamil-quinidine shows the highest SUCRA rank score (87%), followed by antazoline (86%), vernakalant (85%), tedisamil at high dose (i.e., 0.6 mg/kg; 80%), amiodarone-ranolazine (80%), lidocaine (78%), dofetilide (77%), and intravenous flecainide (71%). Taking into account the degree of evidence of each individual comparison between pharmacological agents, we have drawn up a ranking of pharmacological agents from the most effective to the least effective.
CONCLUSIONS
In comparing the antiarrhythmic agents used to restore sinus rhythm in the case of paroxysmal AF, vernakalant, amiodarone-ranolazine, flecainide, and ibutilide are the most effective medications. The verapamil-quinidine combination seems promising, though few RCTs have studied it. The incidence of side effects must be taken into account in the choice of antiarrhythmic in clinical practice.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO: International prospective register of systematic reviews, 2022, CRD42022369433 (Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022369433 ).
Topics: Adult; Humans; Atrial Fibrillation; Quinidine; Flecainide; Electric Countershock; Ranolazine; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Amiodarone; Verapamil
PubMed: 37233967
DOI: 10.1007/s40256-023-00586-5 -
European Journal of Clinical... Nov 2022Postoperative atrial fibrillation/flutter (POAF) is one of the most common cardiac complications after lung surgery. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Postoperative atrial fibrillation/flutter (POAF) is one of the most common cardiac complications after lung surgery. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of pharmacological interventions for new-onset POAF prophylaxis in patients with lung cancer after lung surgery.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of pharmacological interventions to prevent POAF following lung surgery.
RESULTS
A total number of 19 studies with 2,922 participants were included. Pharmacological interventions significantly reduced the incidence of POAF (odds ratio [OR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.26-0.52) while did not increase the incidence of severe pulmonary complications (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.57-2.41) after lung surgery compared with placebo/usual care. Among different trials, beta-blockers appeared to be the most effective with an OR of 0.13 (95% CI, 0.07-0.27) and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 3.63 and was considered safe with no serious adverse events recorded. The risk of POAF decreased from 25.6 to 11.4% (P < 0.001) overall and from 34.2 to 6.7% (P < 0.001) with beta-blockers as monotherapy. Pharmacological interventions did not reduce the 30-day mortality (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.43-1.84, I = 0%), but showed a trend toward reducing major cardiovascular complications including myocardial ischemia/infarction, cardiac arrest, heart failure, and stroke (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.13-1.29, I = 0%).
CONCLUSION
Current clinical evidence supports the effectiveness of pharmacological intervention with beta-blockers, amiodarone, magnesium sulfate, or calcium-channel blockers to reduce the incidence of POAF after lung surgery in patients with lung cancer. In the absence of contraindications, prophylaxis with beta-blockers seems to be the most effective of the treatments studied.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Amiodarone; Atrial Fibrillation; Calcium; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Humans; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Magnesium Sulfate; Myocardial Infarction; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 36136141
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03383-2 -
Cardiology 2017The role of sotalol is well established for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its role in pharmacologic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The role of sotalol is well established for the maintenance of sinus rhythm after successful conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its role in pharmacologic conversion of AF is poorly defined. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of sotalol to that of other antiarrhythmic agents for AF conversion.
METHODS
Standard methods of meta-analysis were employed. Full-text publications of clinical trials in English that compared the efficacy of sotalol to that of other antiarrhythmics or placebo/no treatment were eligible for inclusion.
RESULTS
A systematic review revealed 10 eligible publications. Sotalol was superior to placebo and/or no antiarrhythmic therapy in AF conversion, with a relative success of 24 (95% CI 4.7-119, p < 0.001). Sotalol was not significantly different from class IA antiarrhythmic drugs. Similarly, sotalol was not different from class IC antiarrhythmic drugs or amiodarone in terms of conversion efficacy. In one study, sotalol was less effective than high-dose ibutilide (2 mg), with a relative success of 0.248 (95% CI 0.128-0.481, p < 0.001). Ibutilide caused more proarrhythmia.
CONCLUSIONS
Sotalol is as effective as class IA and class IC antiarrhythmic agents, and it is also as effective as amiodarone for pharmacologic conversion of AF. Only ibutilide at a high dose showed a greater conversion rate of AF.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Amiodarone; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Atrial Fibrillation; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Sotalol; Sulfonamides; Therapeutic Equivalency
PubMed: 27554842
DOI: 10.1159/000447237 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Aug 2011Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of mortality in resource-rich countries, and is becoming a major cause of morbidity and mortality in resource-poor... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of mortality in resource-rich countries, and is becoming a major cause of morbidity and mortality in resource-poor countries. Secondary prevention in this context is long-term treatment to prevent recurrent cardiac morbidity and mortality in people who have had either a prior acute myocardial infarction (MI) or acute coronary syndrome, or who are at high risk due to severe coronary artery stenoses or prior coronary surgical procedures. Secondary prevention in people with an acute MI or acute coronary syndrome within the past 6 months is not included.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of antithrombotic treatment; other drug treatments; cholesterol reduction; blood pressure reduction; non-drug treatments; and revascularisation procedures? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 137 systematic reviews or RCTs that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: advice to eat less fat, advice to eat more fibre, advice to increase consumption of fish oils, amiodarone, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, angiotensin II receptor blockers plus ACE inhibitors, antioxidant vitamin combinations, antiplatelet agents, aspirin, beta-blockers, beta-carotene, blood pressure reduction, calcium channel blockers, cardiac rehabilitation including exercise, class I antiarrhythmic agents, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), fibrates, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), Mediterranean diet, multivitamins, non-specific cholesterol reduction, oral anticoagulants, oral glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), psychosocial treatment, smoking cessation, statins, vitamin C, and vitamin E.
Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease; Coronary Stenosis; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Secondary Prevention; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 21875445
DOI: No ID Found