-
Journal of Vascular and Interventional... Apr 2022The present meta-analysis evaluated the role of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in femoropopliteal artery disease. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The present meta-analysis evaluated the role of drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for in-stent restenosis (ISR) in femoropopliteal artery disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed were searched without language restrictions from inception to May 10, 2020. The endpoints included target lesion revascularization (TLR), recurrent ISR, clinical improvement, ankle-brachial index (ABI), and death. There were 5 randomized controlled trials with 425 patients (218 with DCB angioplasty and 207 with plain old balloon angioplasty [POBA]) were included in the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Compared with POBA, DCB angioplasty was associated with lower risk of TLR (odds ratio [OR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09-0.49, P < .001 at 6 months and OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.08-0.30; P < .001 at 12 months) and recurrent ISR (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.13-0.38; P < .001 at 6 months and OR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.16-0.61; P < .001 at 12 months), and superior clinical improvement (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.07-3.65; P = .03 at 6 months and OR, 2.84; 95% CI: 1.50-5.35; P = .001 at 12 months). There were no significant differences between groups in ABI and death. Subgroup analysis for patients with DCB angioplasty showed similar rates of TLR, recurrent ISR, clinical improvement, and death between the short lesion (<15 cm) and long lesion group (≥15 cm) (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS
The current meta-analysis suggests that DCB angioplasty is an improvement over POBA for femoropopliteal ISR. Future studies about the effect of lesion length on DCB performance are still needed.
Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Coronary Restenosis; Femoral Artery; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Popliteal Artery; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34915164
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.12.007 -
The Journal of Vascular Access Nov 2023This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and technical success rates achieved after performing balloon-assisted maturation (BAM) for non-matured arteriovenous fistula... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and technical success rates achieved after performing balloon-assisted maturation (BAM) for non-matured arteriovenous fistula (AVF). For this, a systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed and Scopus databases. Studies regarding AVFs not suitable for use based on clinical examination or ultrasound criteria and BAM use for correcting the underlying stenotic lesion were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Accordingly, 13 studies with 1427 patients with non-matured AVF who underwent BAM were included. The pooled random effect for the clinical success rate was 90% (95% CI, 86%-93%), and that for the technical success rate was 97% (95% CI, 94%-99%). Complications after BAM were reported in 1.7%-41% of the patients. Complications included venous ruptures, wall hematomas, and puncture site hematomas. Early-BAM group had better clinical success rates. BAM is an effective intervention for salvaging non-matured AVF. The procedure is safe and feasible, and high clinical and technical success rates can be achieved. The complications were also manageable without serious sequelae.
Topics: Humans; Vascular Patency; Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical; Treatment Outcome; Renal Dialysis; Angioplasty, Balloon; Arteriovenous Fistula; Hematoma; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35389293
DOI: 10.1177/11297298221085440 -
JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology Oct 2022Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) may arise from a variety of conditions and result in major morbidity and mortality. In some patients, pharmacologic therapy may help, but... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Pulmonary vein stenosis (PVS) may arise from a variety of conditions and result in major morbidity and mortality. In some patients, pharmacologic therapy may help, but more often in advanced stages, mechanical treatment must be considered. Transcatheter approaches, both balloon angioplasty (BA) and stent implantation, have been applied. Although both are effective, they continue to be limited by restenosis. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus were searched for English-language studies in humans published between January 1, 2010, and August 2, 2021. Two independent reviewers screened for studies in which BA or stenting was performed for PVS with reporting of restenosis outcomes, and data were independently extracted. A systematic review was performed, and overall restenosis rates were reported across all 34 included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan version 5.4, assessing rates of restenosis and restenosis requiring reintervention in those studies with available data reported. For restenosis rates, 4 studies treated a total of 340 patients with 579 pulmonary vein interventions (225 with BA and 354 with stenting, mean follow-up 13-69 months). Restenosis requiring repeat intervention was reported in 3 studies, including 301 patients with 495 pulmonary vein interventions (157 with BA and 338 with stenting). Compared with BA, stenting was associated with both a lower risk for restenosis (risk ratio: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.18-0.73; P = 0.005) and a lower risk for restenosis requiring reintervention (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.15-0.86; P = 0.02). For PVS intervention, restenosis and reintervention rates may be improved by stent implantation compared with BA.
Topics: Humans; Stenosis, Pulmonary Vein; Angioplasty, Balloon; Stents; Pulmonary Veins; Constriction, Pathologic
PubMed: 36117046
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.08.008 -
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Jan 2014We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparing balloon angioplasty and primary stenting for symptomatic infrapopliteal disease to evaluate the clinical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparing balloon angioplasty and primary stenting for symptomatic infrapopliteal disease to evaluate the clinical value of primary stenting in treating infrapopliteal diseases.
METHODS
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. PubMed (1984-present), ScienceDirect (1980-present), Embase (1990-present), and CBM (1988-present) databases were searched for relevant articles. Finally, 16 studies (published between 2001 and 2013) satisfying the inclusion criteria were identified. The outcome parameters were immediate technical success, 1-year primary patency rate, 1-year limb salvage rate, and 1-year target vessel revascularization (TVR)-free rate. Comparisons were made with balloon angioplasty and primary stenting, and based on the different types of stents, we divided the primary stent group into the bare metal stent (BMS) group and drug-eluting stent (DES) group.
RESULTS
A total of 3789 patients and 4339 limbs constituted our final study population. The technical success rate of balloon angioplasty was 92.29% (95% confidence interval [CI] 88.75%-94.78%). Only 2 study reported the technical failure rates as 4% and 5.2% in the primary stent group. The pooled estimates of 1-year primary patency and TVR-free rate were similarly low in the balloon angioplasty group and BMS group (primary patency: 57.65%, 95% CI 53.54%-61.67% vs 60.95%, 95% CI 48.31%-72.28%, P = .38; TVR-free rate: 73.41%, 95% CI 66.51%-80.08% vs 73.66%, 95% CI 63.58%-81.75%, P = .91). The pooled estimates of 1-year primary patency and TVR-free rate in DES group were 81.10% (95% CI 75.48%-85.67%) and 90.30% (95% CI 85.30%-93.73%), respectively, which were better than those of the BMS and balloon angioplasty groups (P < .001 for both). The pooled estimate of 1-year limb salvage in the balloon angioplasty, BMS, and DES groups was 88.61% (95% CI 85.01%-91.43%), 94.41% (95% CI 89.52%-97.1%), and 95.20% (95% CI 86.97%-98.33%), respectively (P < .001). The BMS and DES groups had higher limb salvage rates than the balloon angioplasty group (P < .001 for both comparisons). The rates of severe complications were low both in the balloon angioplasty and in the primary stent groups.
CONCLUSION
Primary BMS implantation had no advantage over balloon angioplasty in reducing restenosis or revascularization for infrapopliteal disease. Primary DES implantation seems to be a promising treatment for focal infrapopliteal lesions. Publication bias could not be ruled out, and the results should be treated with caution.
Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Chi-Square Distribution; Humans; Limb Salvage; Male; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Popliteal Artery; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Patency
PubMed: 24212407
DOI: 10.1177/1538574413510626 -
American Journal of Therapeutics 2013Subclavian artery stenosis has long been treated with great success with bypass surgery. Percutaneous intervention, often used in combination with stent placement, has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Subclavian artery stenosis has long been treated with great success with bypass surgery. Percutaneous intervention, often used in combination with stent placement, has come into vogue for the past few years as a safe and effective therapeutic modality. This study aimed to compare angioplasty alone with angioplasty followed by stent placement by combining available data. The objective of this study was to perform a review of the available literature to compare the efficacy of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) alone with PTA followed by stent placement for proximal subclavian artery stenosis. Successful recanalization was defined as patency at the end of 1 year, and reocclusions and restenoses were noted as events for the purpose of pooling the data. The authors searched the Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases for relevant trials/studies comparing PTA and PTA with stenting. Review authors independently assessed the methodological quality of studies (focusing on the adequacy of the randomization process, allocation concealment, blinding, completeness of follow-up, and intention-to-treat analysis) and selected studies for inclusion. All retrospective observational studies were also included in the analysis in the absence of double-blinded randomized trials for increasing sample size. All analyses were done using RevMan 5.0. Odds ratio was calculated using Mantel-Haenszel test with a fixed effect model. All included studies were assessed by all authors for potential sources of bias. Eight studies were included in the analysis having 544 participants. Stenting after PTA was significantly superior to angioplasty alone for treatment of subclavian artery stenosis and maintenance of patency at 1 year, as indicated by absence of events (P = 0.004; 95% confidence interval, odds ratio 2.37 [1.32-4.26]) without significant complication rates for either procedure. There is evidence in favor of stent placement after angioplasty for successful recanalization of stenosed subclavian arteries and long-term maintenance of patency without significant increase in risk for major complications in subjects.
Topics: Angioplasty; Humans; Stents; Subclavian Steal Syndrome
PubMed: 23344091
DOI: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e31822831d8 -
Cardiovascular and Interventional... Jan 2023To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the safety and efficacy of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in the treatment of chronic thromboembolic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the safety and efficacy of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) in the treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Systematic literature searches were performed from inception to June 2022 to identify studies assessing BPA for CTEPH. Outcomes of interest included the following functional and hemodynamic measures: (a) six-minute walk distance (6MWD), (b) New York Heart Association (NYHA) status, (c) World Health Organization (WHO)-Functional Class status, (d) cardiac index (CI), (e) mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), (f) mean right atrial pressure (mRAP), and (g) pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Subgroup analysis was also performed for BPA in post-pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) patients. All reported BPA-related complications were also recorded. Forty unique studies with a total of 1763 patients were identified for meta-analysis.
RESULTS
All functional and hemodynamic parameters improved significantly following BPA; 6MWD increased 70 m (95% CI 58-82; P < 0.001), NYHA class improved by - 0.9 classes (95% CI - 1.0 to - 0.8; P < 0.001), WHO-FC class improved by - 1 classes ((95% CI - 1.2 to - 0.9; P < 0.001), CI increased 0.26 L/min/m (95% CI 0.17-0.35; P < 0.001), mPAP decreased - 13.2 mmHg (95% CI - 14.7 to - 11.8; P < 0.001), mRAP decreased - 2.2 mmHg (95% CI - 2.8 to - 1.6; P < 0.001), and PVR decreased - 311 dyne/cm/s (95% CI - 350 to - 271; P < 0.001). Meta-analysis of patients who underwent BPA for persistent pulmonary hypertension post-PEA demonstrated significant improvements in 6MWD, WHO-FC, PVR and mPAP. Most common complications included lung injury (8.16%), hemoptysis (7.07%) and vessel injury (5.05%).
CONCLUSION
BPA represents a safe and effective treatment option for select individuals with CTEPH with significant improvements in hemodynamic parameters, improved exercise tolerance and a relatively low risk of major complications.
Topics: Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Pulmonary Artery; Pulmonary Embolism; Chronic Disease; Angioplasty, Balloon; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36474104
DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03323-8 -
Journal of Endovascular Therapy : An... Nov 2023The article aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty (BA) with BA alone for the treatment of infrapopliteal arterial disease. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The article aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty (BA) with BA alone for the treatment of infrapopliteal arterial disease.
METHODS
According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library database were searched for studies comparing atherectomy plus angioplasty and angioplasty alone in treating infrapopliteal artery lesions until November 2022. The endpoints included technical success, primary patency, clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), periprocedural complications, distal embolization, target limb major amputation, and all-cause mortality.
RESULTS
Ten studies met the requirements of our meta-analysis, including 7723 patients in the atherectomy plus BA group and 2299 patients in the BA alone group. The meta-analysis showed that atherectomy plus BA was associated with reduced CD-TLR (odds ratio [OR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34, 0.78, p=0.002) and target limb major amputation (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.19, 1.01, p=0.05) at 12-month follow-up. No statistically significant difference was found in technical success, primary patency, periprocedural complications, distal embolization, or all-cause mortality. Subgroup analysis found a higher rate of primary patency at 6 and 12 months (6 months: OR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.11, 4.60, p=0.02; 12 months: OR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.16, 4.86, p=0.02), and lower rates of CD-TLR (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.82, p=0.009) and target limb major amputation (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.19, 1.01, p=0.05) at 12 months in patients treated with atherectomy plus drug-coated balloon (DCB) but not in patients treated with atherectomy plus plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA).
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis suggests that compared with BA alone, atherectomy plus BA may reduce the need for CD-TLR and the incidence of target limb major amputation at 12-month follow-up in the treatment of infrapopliteal artery occlusive lesions, even though there are no significant advantages in technical success, primary patency, periprocedural complications, distal embolization, or all-cause mortality. To go further, atherectomy plus DCB shows significant benefits in primary patency, CD-TLR, and target limb major amputation rate but atherectomy plus POBA does not'. However, due to the limitations of this article, more randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed to confirm these conclusions.
CLINICAL IMPACT
According to our research, atherectomy combined with BA has the advantages of higher primary patency rate, lower CD-TLR and target limb significant amputation rate in treating infrapopliteal artery occlusive lesions, which may replace the current mainstream surgical method ---BA alone. For the clinician, although the surgery may take longer, it will significantly improve the prognosis and quality of life of patients and hold considerable significance for the management of patients with infrapopliteal arterial disease. Based on the characteristics of infrapopliteal artery disease, this study explored the feasibility of atherectomy combined with BA for infrapopliteal artery disease. Moreover, we found that atherectomy combined with DCB had better clinical efficacy, which should be the innovation of this study.
PubMed: 37933456
DOI: 10.1177/15266028231209236 -
Circulation. Cardiovascular... May 2016Contemporary outcomes of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of infrapopliteal atherosclerotic lesions are not well characterized. Hence, a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Contemporary outcomes of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of infrapopliteal atherosclerotic lesions are not well characterized. Hence, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to determine the safety and effectiveness of this approach in patients with advanced below-the-knee arterial disease.
METHODS AND RESULTS
MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for contemporary studies (2005-2015) on the effects of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of infrapopliteal lesions. A random effects meta-analysis model was used to analyze procedural (technical success, flow-limiting dissection, provisional stent placement) and long-term (primary patency, repeat revascularization, major amputation, all-cause mortality) outcomes. Ultimately, 52 studies encompassing 6769 patients with 9399 below-the-knee lesions were included in the analysis. Technical success was 91.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.8-93.0), and the incidence of flow-limiting dissections and bailout stenting was 5.6% (95% CI, 3.2-9.8) and 9.1% (95% CI, 6.3-12.9), respectively. Outcomes at 1 year were primary patency, 63.1% (95% CI, 57.3-68.6); repeat revascularization, 18.2% (95% CI, 14.5-22.6); major amputation, 14.9% (95% CI, 12.3-18.0); and all-cause mortality, 15.1% (95% CI, 12.8-17.7). Significant heterogeneity and publication bias were observed for most percutaneous transluminal angioplasty outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
Contemporary studies of the use of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty as primary treatment for patients with infrapopliteal arterial disease reveal suboptimal procedural and 1-year clinical outcomes.
Topics: Angioplasty; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Popliteal Artery; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27162214
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003468 -
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Feb 2017Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) and drug-eluting stent (DES) have been proposed for the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease. We performed a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Drug-eluting balloon (DEB) and drug-eluting stent (DES) have been proposed for the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the current available studies investigating outcomes of DEB and DES in the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease.
METHODS
Multiple databases were systematically searched to identify studies investigating the outcomes of DEB and DES in the treatment of patients with infrapopliteal artery disease. The quality of studies was assessed by Cochrane Collaboration method. The demographic data, risk factors, outcomes, and antiplatelet strategy were extracted.
RESULTS
Nine studies were identified with 707 and 606 patients in DEB/DES and standard percutaneous balloon angioplasty (PTA)/bare metal stenting (BMS) group, respectively. The risk of target lesion revascularization (TLR; odds ratio [OR] = 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.63, P < .01), restenosis rate (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.18-0.50, P < .01), and amputation rate (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.29-0.83, P < .01) significantly decreased in the DES group. The overall survival (OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.56-1.32, P = .50) was similar in DES and standard PTA/BMS group; TLR (OR = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.32-1.09, P = .09), restenosis rate (OR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.11-2.14, P = .35), amputation rate (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 0.51-3.40, P = .57), and overall survival (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.72-2.71, P = .32) were similar in DEB and standard PTA group.
CONCLUSION
The present meta-analysis suggests that compared with standard PTA/BMS, DES may decrease the risk of clinically driven TLR, restenosis rate, and amputation rate without any impact on mortality. However, DEB has no obvious advantage in the treatment of infrapopliteal disease. Due to the limitations of our study, more randomized controlled trials, especially those for DEB, are necessary.
Topics: Amputation, Surgical; Angioplasty, Balloon; Chi-Square Distribution; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Constriction, Pathologic; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Limb Salvage; Odds Ratio; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Popliteal Artery; Prosthesis Design; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Access Devices; Vascular Patency
PubMed: 28103754
DOI: 10.1177/1538574416689426 -
Heart, Lung & Circulation Jan 2018A significant number of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients will have an inoperable disease. Medical therapy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
A significant number of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients will have an inoperable disease. Medical therapy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) have provided alternate therapeutic options for patients with inoperable CTEPH, although there are a limited number of published studies examining the outcomes. Thus, our study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of medical therapy and BPA in patients with inoperable CTEPH.
METHODS
An electronic search of six databases was performed and the search results were screened against established criteria for inclusion into this study. Data was extracted and meta-analytical techniques were used to analyse the data.
RESULTS
Pooled data from RCTs revealed that medical therapy, compared with a placebo, was associated with a significant improvement of at least one functional class (p=0.038). With regards to pulmonary haemodynamics, medical therapy also resulted in a significant reduction in both mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) (p=0.002) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) (p<0.001). From the included observational studies, the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) significantly increased following medical therapy by an average of 22.8% (p<0.001). The pooled improvement in 6MWD was found to be significantly higher in the BPA group when compared to medical therapy for CTEPH (p=0.001). Pooled data from available observational studies of medical therapy or BPA all demonstrated significant improvements in mPAP and PVR for pre versus post intervention comparisons. The improvement in mPAP (p=0.002) and PVR (p=0.002) were significantly greater for BPA intervention when compared to medical therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
High-quality evidence supports the use of targeted medical therapy in improving haemodynamics in patients with inoperable CTEPH. There is only moderate-quality evidence from observational studies supporting the efficacy of BPA in improving both haemodynamics and exercise capacity. Further RCTs and prospective observational studies comparing medical therapy and BPA in patients with inoperable CTEPH are required.
Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Chronic Disease; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Pulmonary Artery; Pulmonary Embolism; Thrombolytic Therapy
PubMed: 28291667
DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.01.016