-
Journal of Affective Disorders Jul 2024Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a heterogeneous group of mood disorders. A prominent symptom domain is anhedonia narrowly defined as a loss of interest and ability to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a heterogeneous group of mood disorders. A prominent symptom domain is anhedonia narrowly defined as a loss of interest and ability to experience pleasure. Anhedonia is associated with depressive symptom severity, MDD prognosis, and suicidality. We perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of extant literature investigating the effects of anhedonia on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and functional outcomes in persons with MDD.
METHODS
A literature search was conducted on PubMed, OVID databases, and SCOPUS for published articles from inception to November 2023, reporting on anhedonia and patient-reported outcomes in persons with MDD. The reported correlation coefficients between anhedonia and self-reported measures of both HRQoL and functional outcomes were pooled using a random effects model.
RESULTS
We identified 20 studies that investigated anhedonia with HRQoL and/or functional outcomes in MDD. Anhedonia as measured by the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) scores had a statistically significant correlation with patient-reported HRQoL (r = -0.41 [95 % CI = -0.60, -0.18]) and functional impairment (r = 0.39 [95 % CI = 0.22, 0.54]).
LIMITATIONS
These preliminary results primarily investigate correlations with consummatory anhedonia and do not distinguish differences in anticipatory anhedonia, reward valuation or reward learning; therefore, these results require replication.
CONCLUSIONS
Persons with MDD experiencing symptoms of anhedonia are more likely to have worse prognosis including physical, psychological, and social functioning deficits. Anhedonia serves as an important predictor and target for future therapeutic and preventative tools in persons with MDD.
Topics: Humans; Anhedonia; Depressive Disorder, Major; Quality of Life
PubMed: 38657767
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.086 -
Neurobiology and Symptomatology of Post-Acute Alcohol Withdrawal: A Mixed-Studies Systematic Review.Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs Jul 2022This study aims to review the neurobiology and symptomatology of post-acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome (PAWS).
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to review the neurobiology and symptomatology of post-acute alcohol withdrawal syndrome (PAWS).
METHOD
We conducted a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-guided systematic review of articles from two databases for English-language randomized and nonrandomized studies involving PAWS published between database inception and December 2020.
RESULTS
Twenty-seven studies met inclusion criteria. PAWS involves predominantly negative affect, which develops in early abstinence and can persist for 4-6 months or longer. Symptoms include anxiety, dysphoria, anhedonia, sleep disturbance, cognitive impairment, cravings, and irritability. PAWS symptoms appear to be risk factors for recurrent alcohol consumption. They have been associated with reported neurobiological differences in evoked potentials; measures of orexins, cortisol, serotonin, and pancreatic polypeptides; and neuroadaptation changes in the nucleus accumbens and the prefrontal cortex.
CONCLUSIONS
There is credible evidence to support the concept of PAWS based on this review's findings. There remains a need to develop and test specific criteria for PAWS. High-quality treatment studies involving agents addressing its neurobiological underpinnings are also recommended.
Topics: Humans; Alcohol Drinking; Alcoholism; Craving; Neurobiology; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome
PubMed: 35838422
DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2022.83.461 -
European Neuropsychopharmacology : the... Jun 2024Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, is a racemic mixture of esketamine and arketamine used to treat unipolar and bipolar depression. Preliminary... (Review)
Review
Ketamine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, is a racemic mixture of esketamine and arketamine used to treat unipolar and bipolar depression. Preliminary reports indicate that it may be beneficial for depressed patients reporting symptoms of anhedonia. In this systematic review we aim to assess and analyze the existing body of evidence regarding the therapeutic effects of ketamine on the domain of anhedonia. Electronic databases (PubMed, APA Psycinfo and Web of Science) were searched from inception to November 2023. Protocol was registered in PROSPERO under the identifier CRD42023476603. A total of twenty-two studies, including four randomized-controlled trials and eighteen open-label trials were included. All studies reported alleviation of anhedonia symptoms following ketamine or esketamine administration, regardless of the number of infusions. Several important limitations were included, first and foremost low number of placebo-controlled randomized-controlled trials. This review indicates a potential anti-anhedonic effect of ketamine in patients with depression. Several trials used neuroimaging techniques which confirm ketamine's effect on functional connectivity correlating with the improvement in anhedonia. Despite considerable variations in methodology and the specific brain regions investigated, these studies collectively point towards ketamine's neuroplastic effects in mitigating anhedonia.
PubMed: 38917771
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.04.014 -
European Neuropsychopharmacology : the... Dec 2023Anhedonia is described as a decreased ability to experience rewarding and enjoyable activities, a core symptom of major depressive disorder. The sucrose preference test... (Review)
Review
Anhedonia is described as a decreased ability to experience rewarding and enjoyable activities, a core symptom of major depressive disorder. The sucrose preference test (SPT) is a widely used and reliable behavioural test to assess anhedonia in rodents, based on a two-bottle choice paradigm. To date, different protocols are in use, inducing variability between researchers and hampering comparisons between studies. We performed a systematic review of the SPT protocols used in 2021 to identify the parameters in which they differ and their potential impact. We searched a total of four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Science Direct), from 1st January 2021 to 31st December 2021, and screened a total of 1066 articles. After screening by title and abstract, a total of 415 articles were included in this review. We extracted and analysed the different procedures used, the type of sweet solution and the habituation, deprivation, and testing protocols. The overall quality of the studies was considered very good, however, SPT protocols were extremely variable between studies with a total of 65 different habituation protocols and 104 combinations of food/water deprivation and preference testing duration. As the SPT is one of the most used tests to assess anhedonia in rodents, this work raises awareness of the great variability in SPT protocols being currently used. Furthermore, we call for standardization in the protocol used, and overall improvement of data reporting of methodologies and results, to increase the consistency between studies and allow a better comparison of results between different labs.
Topics: Animals; Anhedonia; Depressive Disorder, Major; Food; Rodentia; Sucrose
PubMed: 37741164
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.08.496 -
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs May 2023Schizophrenia is a mental illness that can disrupt emotions, perceptions, and cognition and reduce quality of life. The classical approach to treat schizophrenia is to...
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ulotaront (SEP-363856, a trace amine-associated receptor 1 agonist) for the treatment of schizophrenia and other mental disorders: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical trials.
INTRODUCTION
Schizophrenia is a mental illness that can disrupt emotions, perceptions, and cognition and reduce quality of life. The classical approach to treat schizophrenia is to use typical and atypical antipsychotics; however, limitations include low efficacy in mitigating negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunctions and a range of adverse effects. Evidence has accumulated on trace amine-associated receptor 1 (TAAR1) as a novel therapeutic target for treating schizophrenia. This systematic review investigates the available evidence on a TAAR1 agonist, ulotaront, as a treatment for schizophrenia.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE and Ovid databases for English-published articles from inception to 18 December 2022. The literature focusing on the association between ulotaront and schizophrenia was evaluated based on an inclusion/exclusion criterion. Selected studies were assessed for the risk of bias, using the Cochrane Collaboration tool, and summarized in a table to generate discussion topics.
RESULTS
Three clinical, two comparative, and five preclinical studies examining ulotaront's pharmacology, tolerability and safety, and/or efficacy were identified. Results indicate that ulotaront has a differing adverse effect profile from other antipsychotics, may mitigate metabolic-related adverse effects commonly associated with antipsychotics, and may be effective for treating positive and negative symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS
Findings from the available literature present ulotaront as a potential and promising alternative treatment method for schizophrenia. Despite this, our results were limited due to the lack of clinical trials on ulotaront's long-term efficacy and mechanisms of action. Future research should focus on these limitations to elucidate ulotaront's efficacy and safety for the treatment of schizophrenia and other mental disorders with similar pathophysiology.
Topics: Humans; Schizophrenia; Antipsychotic Agents; Quality of Life
PubMed: 37096491
DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2023.2206559 -
Journal of Psychiatric Practice Nov 2015To consolidate the evidence from the literature to evaluate the role of ketamine in the treatment of bipolar depression. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To consolidate the evidence from the literature to evaluate the role of ketamine in the treatment of bipolar depression.
METHODS
Major databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus, were searched through October 2014, for studies reporting the role of ketamine in the treatment of bipolar depression. Only randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. We calculated standardized mean differences (SMDs) with SE for each study included in the meta-analysis. A random effect model was used to calculate the pooled SMDs. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran Q test and I statistic.
RESULTS
Of the 721 articles that were screened, 5 studies that enrolled a total of 125 subjects with bipolar depression (mean age, 44.6±4.3 y and 65.6% females) were included in the systematic review; 3 randomized controlled trials (69 subjects) were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed significant improvement in depression among patients receiving a single dose of intravenous ketamine compared with those who received placebo (SMD=-1.01; 95% confidence interval, -1.37, -0.66; P<0.0001). The maximum improvement was observed 40 minutes after the ketamine infusion. No heterogeneity was observed between the studies (Cochran Q test P=0.38, I=0%). The 2 studies that were excluded from the meta-analysis also showed significant improvement in depression after ketamine therapy. Individual studies also reported improvement in anhedonia and suicidal ideation after ketamine therapy. None of the subjects had serious side effects, and the side effects were similar between the ketamine and placebo groups.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that ketamine is effective in treatment-resistant bipolar depression and may reduce suicidal ideation and anhedonia.
Topics: Adult; Anhedonia; Bipolar Disorder; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Female; Humans; Ketamine; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Suicidal Ideation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26554325
DOI: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000106 -
Harvard Review of Psychiatry 2020After participating in this activity, learners should be better able to:• Evaluate the relationship between negative symptoms and functioning in youth at clinical high... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
LEARNING OBJECTIVE
After participating in this activity, learners should be better able to:• Evaluate the relationship between negative symptoms and functioning in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.
AIM
Youth at CHR for psychosis often demonstrate significant negative symptoms and poor functioning, though the magnitude and direction of the relationship between the two remains unknown. The objective of this systematic review is to summarize the relationship between negative symptoms and functioning in CHR samples.
METHOD
Electronic databases CINAHL, EBM, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO were searched from inception. Studies were selected if they included any study that reported a relationship between negative symptoms and functioning in youth at clinical high risk (CHR). The correlation coefficient r was converted to Cohen's d, and all random-effects meta-analyses were performed using the transformed values.
RESULTS
Forty-one studies met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 4574 individuals at CHR for psychosis. Negative symptom total scores were significantly associated with poorer global functioning (d, -1.40; 95% CI, -1.82 to -0.98; I = 79.4%; p < .001 [9 studies, n = 782]), social functioning (d, -1.10; 95% CI, -1.27 to -0.93; I = 10.40%; p < .001 [12 studies, n = 811]), and role functioning (d, -0.96; 95% CI, -1.17 to -0.76; I = 41.1%; p < .001 [9 studies, n = 881]). In addition, negative symptoms were consistently associated with poor premorbid functioning. When examining negative symptom domains, avolition, anhedonia, and blunted affect were each significantly and independently associated with poorer social functioning and role functioning. In terms of prediction models, negative symptoms contributed to the prediction of lower functioning across multiple studies.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis demonstrates a strong relationship between negative symptoms and functioning in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.
Topics: Humans; Psychotic Disorders; Risk Assessment; Social Adjustment; Social Behavior Disorders; Young Adult
PubMed: 33156155
DOI: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000273 -
JAMA Network Open Oct 2023Reliable screening for major depressive disorder (MDD) relies on valid and accurate screening tools. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Reliable screening for major depressive disorder (MDD) relies on valid and accurate screening tools.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the validity, accuracy, and reliability of the Spanish-language Patient Health Questionnaires 2 and 9 (PHQ-2 and PHQ-9) to screen for MDD.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and PsycINFO from data initiation through February 27, 2023.
STUDY SELECTION
English- and Spanish-language studies evaluating the validity of the Spanish-language PHQ-2 or PHQ-9 in screening adults for MDD compared with a standardized clinical interview (gold standard). Search terms included PHQ-2, PHQ-9, depression, and Spanish.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Two reviewers performed abstract and full-text reviews, data extraction, and quality assessment. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Random-effects meta-analyses of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were performed. Internal consistency was evaluated using Cronbach α and McDonald ψ.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Test accuracy and internal consistency. The PHQ-2 is composed of the first 2 questions of the PHQ-9 (targeting core depression symptoms of depressed mood and anhedonia; a score of 3 or higher (score range, 0-6) is generally considered a positive depression screen. If a patient screens positive with the PHQ-2, a follow-up assessment with the PHQ-9 and a clinical diagnostic evaluation are recommended. Once depression is diagnosed, a PHQ-9 score of 10 or higher (score range, 0-27) is often considered an acceptable threshold for treating depression.
RESULTS
Ten cross-sectional studies involving 5164 Spanish-speaking adults (mean age range, 34.1-71.8 years) were included; most studies (n = 8) were in primary care settings. One study evaluated the PHQ-2, 7 evaluated the PHQ-9, and 2 evaluated both the PHQ-2 and PHQ-9. For the PHQ-2, optimal cutoff scores ranged from greater than or equal to 1 to greater than or equal to 2, with an overall pooled sensitivity of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81-0.95), overall pooled specificity of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.81-0.95), and overall pooled AUC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83-0.90); Cronbach α was 0.71 to 0.75, and McDonald ψ was 0.71. For the PHQ-9, optimal cutoff scores ranged from greater than or equal to 5 to greater than or equal to 12, with an overall pooled sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.90), overall pooled specificity of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.85), and overall pooled AUC of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87-0.90); Cronbach α was 0.78 to 0.90, and McDonald ψ was 0.79 to 0.90. Four studies were considered to have low risk of bias; 6 studies had indeterminate risk of bias due to a lack of blinding information.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, limited available evidence supported the use of the Spanish-language PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 in screening for MDD, but optimal cutoff scores varied greatly across studies, and few studies reported on blinding schemes. These results suggest that MDD should be considered in Spanish-speaking individuals with lower test scores. Given the widespread clinical use of the tools and the heterogeneity of existing evidence, further investigation is needed.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Middle Aged; Aged; Patient Health Questionnaire; Depressive Disorder, Major; Reproducibility of Results; Cross-Sectional Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires; Language
PubMed: 37847505
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36529 -
PsyCh Journal Apr 2024Anhedonia is a transdiagnostic symptom found in patients with schizophrenia and depression. Current pharmacological interventions for anhedonia are unsatisfactory in a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Anhedonia is a transdiagnostic symptom found in patients with schizophrenia and depression. Current pharmacological interventions for anhedonia are unsatisfactory in a considerable proportion of patients. There has been growing interest in applying noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to patients with anhedonia. However, evidence for the efficacy of NIBS for anhedonia remain inconsistent. This study systematically identified all studies that measured anhedonia and applied NIBS in patients with schizophrenia or depression. We conducted a search using the various databases in English (PubMed, EBSCOHost (PsycInfo/PsycArticles), Web of Science) and Chinese (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform) languages, and reviewed original research articles on NIBS published from January 1989 to July 2023. Our search had identified 15 articles for quantitative synthesis, with three concerning schizophrenia samples, 11 concerning samples with depression, and one concerning both clinical samples. We conducted a meta-analysis based on the 15 included studies, and the results suggested that NIBS could improve anhedonia symptoms in schizophrenia patients and patients with depression, with a medium-to-large effect size. Our findings are preliminary, given the limited number of included studies. Future NIBS research should measure anhedonia as a primary outcome and should recruit transdiagnostic samples.
Topics: Humans; Schizophrenia; Anhedonia; Depression; Brain; China
PubMed: 38151800
DOI: 10.1002/pchj.723 -
Frontiers in Psychiatry 2022Consistent evidence suggests residual depressive symptomology are the strongest predictors of depression relapse following cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and...
A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Network Analysis of the Residual Symptom Structure Following Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy and Escitalopram, Mirtazapine and Venlafaxine for Depression.
OBJECTIVE
Consistent evidence suggests residual depressive symptomology are the strongest predictors of depression relapse following cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and antidepressant medications (ADM's). Psychometric network models help detecting and understanding central symptoms that remain post-treatment, along with their complex co-occurrences. However, individual psychometric network studies show inconsistent findings. This systematic review and IPD network analysis aimed to estimate and compare the symptom network structures of residual depressive symptoms following CBT, ADM's, and their combination.
METHODS
PsycINFO, PsycArticles, and PubMed were systematically searched through October 2020 for studies that have assessed individuals with major depression at post-treatment receiving either CBT and/or ADM's (venlafaxine, escitalopram, mirtazapine). IPD was requested from eligible samples to estimate and compare residual symptom psychometric network models post-CBT and post-ADM's.
RESULTS
In total, 25 from 663 eligible samples, including 1,389 patients qualified for the IPD. Depressed mood and anhedonia were consistently central residual symptoms post-CBT and post-ADM's. For CBT, fatigue-related and anxiety symptoms were also central post-treatment. A significant difference in network structure across treatments (CBT vs. ADM) was observed for samples measuring depression severity using the MADRS. Specifically, stronger symptom occurrences were present amongst post-CBT (vs. ADM's) and amongst post-ADM's (vs. CBT). No significant difference in global strength was observed across treatments.
CONCLUSIONS
Core major depression symptoms remain central across treatments, strategies to target these symptoms should be considered. Anxiety and fatigue related complaints also remain central post-CBT. Efforts must be made amongst researchers, institutions, and journals to permit sharing of IPD. A protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020141663; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=141663).
PubMed: 35178002
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.746678