-
Clinical Otolaryngology : Official... Nov 2023Otitis externa is a condition causing inflammation of the outer ear canal, which presents with itching, discharge and pain. Most cases of acute otitis externa are caused... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Otitis externa is a condition causing inflammation of the outer ear canal, which presents with itching, discharge and pain. Most cases of acute otitis externa are caused by bacterial infection and are thus treated with antibiotics. This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials aims to assess the effectiveness of topical non-antibiotic treatments compared to topical antibiotic treatment for the treatment of acute otitis externa.
METHODS
Systematic review and meta-analysis databases searched: Cochrane Library including ClinicalTrials.gov; MEDLINE; World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Web of Science to identify randomised clinical trials evaluating topical antibiotics and topical non-antibiotic agents in adults and children with acute otitis externa. Non-antibiotic therapeutics for comparison with topical antibiotics included antiseptics, steroids, non-pharmaceuticals and astringents.
RESULTS
Seventeen trials were eligible for inclusion, with 10 combined in meta-analysis. Data could be pooled comparing antiseptic and steroid monotherapies with topical antibiotic agents. There were no significant differences in cure rates in any pairwise comparisons. Individually, the majority of studies favoured topical antiseptics or steroids over antibiotics, however these differences were not significant when pooled in meta-analysis.
CONCLUSION
Antiseptic, steroid and antibiotic monotherapies are all effective for the management of acute otitis externa. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that topical antiseptic or steroid agents are superior or inferior to topical antibiotics.
Topics: Adult; Child; Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Otitis Externa; Anti-Infective Agents, Local; Inflammation; Acute Disease; Steroids
PubMed: 37550850
DOI: 10.1111/coa.14084 -
The Science of the Total Environment Jul 2021Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are prevalent in estuarine and coastal environments due to substantial terrestrial input, aquaculture effluent, and... (Review)
Review
Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) are prevalent in estuarine and coastal environments due to substantial terrestrial input, aquaculture effluent, and sewage discharge. In this article, based on peer-reviewed papers, the sources, spatial patterns, driving factors, and environmental implications of antibiotics and ARGs in global estuarine and coastal environments are discussed. Riverine runoff, WWTPs, sewage discharge, and aquaculture, are responsible for the prevalence of antibiotics and ARGs. Geographically, pollution due to antibiotics in low- and middle-income countries is higher than that in high-income countries, and ARGs show remarkable latitudinal variations. The distribution of antibiotics is driven by antibiotic usage and environmental variables (heavy metals, nutrients, organic pollutants, etc.), while ARGs are affected by antibiotics residues, environmental variables, microbial communities, and mobile genetic elements (MGEs). Antibiotics and ARGs alter microbial communities and biogeochemical cycles, as well as pose threats to marine organisms and human health. Our results provide comprehensive insights into the transport and environmental behaviors of antibiotics and ARGs in global estuarine and coastal environments.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Genes, Bacterial; Humans; Metals, Heavy; Sewage
PubMed: 33676219
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146009 -
International Journal of Antimicrobial... Jul 2016Antibiotic resistance is a global issue. Risk factors specific to low-income countries (LICs), including non-prescribed antibiotic use, place them at risk for the... (Review)
Review
Antibiotic resistance is a global issue. Risk factors specific to low-income countries (LICs), including non-prescribed antibiotic use, place them at risk for the emergence of resistance and make them important targets for reducing the burden of resistance worldwide. Responding to this threat in LICs means first having access to appropriate antibiotic consumption data. A PubMed search was conducted for studies examining antibiotic consumption in the community in LICs. For the articles included in the analysis, the methodologies used, type of data gathered and methodological appropriateness in responding to specific LIC data needs were noted. Of the 487 articles identified by the search strategy, 27 were retained for final analysis. Four main investigative methods were identified, including pharmacy/hospital document reviews, the simulated client method, observed prescribing encounters/patient exit interviews and community surveys. Observed encounters and exit interviews are well adapted to answering a number of important questions surrounding antibiotic consumption but may include bias and miss some sources of non-prescribed antibiotics. Community surveys are the only approach able to fully account for non-prescribed antibiotics and should be used as the first step in an integrative approach towards antibiotic consumption measurement and monitoring in LICs. Antibiotic consumption data needed for programmes to control use must take into account the LIC context. An integrated and adaptive approach beginning with community surveys responds to the various data needs and difficulties of LIC contexts and may help facilitate the investigation and optimisation of antibiotic consumption in these settings.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Data Collection; Developing Countries; Drug Utilization; Humans
PubMed: 27318624
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2016.04.024 -
Environmental Science and Pollution... Dec 2021To investigate the association between antibiotic exposure and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Four electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
To investigate the association between antibiotic exposure and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Four electronic databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, were searched for all relevant studies, from inception until May 2021, without restrictions. Pooled odds risk (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was applied to evaluate the effect value. Nine studies counting a total of 3,924,272 participants were assessed in the systematic review and meta-analyses. By meta-analysis using no antibiotic exposure as the reference, antibiotic exposure has a higher risk for T2DM (OR=1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.22). Subgroup analyses suggested that the antibiotic exposure could significantly enhance the risk of T2DM in those whose age were more than 50 (OR=1.17; 95% CI, 1.08-1.25). Further stratified analysis indicated that the association was likely attributed to the chemical structure of antibiotics, but not to antibacterial type and mechanism of action. Our results may further support the possibility that antibiotic use in recent years was associated with increased risk of T2DM. More attentions and cautions should be taken by the physicians when prescribing antibiotics.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans
PubMed: 34622400
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16781-3 -
International Journal of Environmental... May 2022Research has been conducted into the advantages of the systemic administration of antibiotics. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Research has been conducted into the advantages of the systemic administration of antibiotics. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of systemic antibiotic administration in the treatment of peri-implantitis in terms of bleeding on probing (BoP) and probing pocket depth (PPD). Literature searches were performed across PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) to identify randomized controlled trials and observational clinical studies. After peri-implantitis treatment, PPD was reduced by 0.1 mm ( = 0.58; IC 95% [-0.24, 0.47]), indicating a non-significant effect of antibiotic administration on PPD. The BoP odds ratio value was 1.15 ( = 0.5; IC 95% [0.75, 1.75]), indicating that the likelihood of bleeding is almost similar between the test and control groups. Secondary outcomes were found, such as reduced clinical attachment level, lower suppuration and recession, less bone loss, and a reduction in total bacterial counts. In the treatment of peri-implantitis, the systemic antibiotic application reduces neither PPD nor BoP. Therefore, the systemic administration of antibiotics, in the case of peri-implantitis, should be rethought in light of the present results, contributing to address the problem of increasing antibiotic resistance.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Load; Peri-Implantitis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35682086
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116502 -
Postgraduate Medical Journal Aug 2023Previous studies evaluating the impact of antibiotic timing on mortality in sepsis have shown conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Previous studies evaluating the impact of antibiotic timing on mortality in sepsis have shown conflicting results. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the association between door-to-antibiotic time (each hour of delay) and mortality in sepsis.
METHODS
We searched PubMed and Embase through 10 November 2022 to identity cohort studies that evaluated the adjusted association between door-to-antibiotic time (each hour of delay) and mortality in adult patients with sepsis. The primary outcome was mortality. Analysis was based on inverse-variance weighting using a fixed-effects model. The variances were derived from the logarithms of the reported confidence intervals (CIs) for associations. We estimated the odds ratio, 95% CI, and number needed to treat for the pooled data.
RESULTS
Fifteen cohort studies involving 106 845 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Door-to-antibiotic time (each hour of delay) was associated with increased risk of mortality (odds ratio: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.06-1.08; P < 0.0001; number needed to treat = 91), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 82.2%). The association was robust in sensitivity analyses and consistent in subgroup analyses. No publication bias was found.
CONCLUSION
In adult patients with sepsis, each hour of delay in antibiotic administration is associated with increased odds of mortality. Key messages What is already known on this topic Sepsis is a common and lethal syndrome that affects millions of people worldwide. The updated 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommended initiating empirical broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage within 1 hour of identification of sepsis and septic shock. Delay in antibiotic administration may increase the risk of mortality in patients with sepsis. What this study adds This meta-analysis evaluates and quantifies the association between door-to-antibiotic time (each hour of delay) and mortality in patients with sepsis. Each hour of delay in antibiotic administration is associated with increased odds of mortality in sepsis. The number needed to treat (NNT) with delayed antibiotic administration for one additional death was 91. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy: More efforts should be made to speed up the diagnosis of sepsis or sepsis shock.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Sepsis; Shock, Septic
PubMed: 36917816
DOI: 10.1093/postmj/qgad024 -
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 2022Neisseria meningitidis is one of the most important causes of meningitis and pathogens-associated deaths in developing and developed countries. Effective anti-microbial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Neisseria meningitidis is one of the most important causes of meningitis and pathogens-associated deaths in developing and developed countries. Effective anti-microbial agents are pivotal to treat and control N. meningitidis infections. The aim of the present study was to systematically review published studies on the antibiotic resistance of N. meningitidis in the last 20 years (2000-2020) in the world.
METHODS
Published researches were identified through a literature search using reputable databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Finally, 24 studies were included for a random-effects model meta-analysis.
RESULTS
The overall resistance to most commonly used antibiotics such as ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and rifampin was low, ranging from 1 to 3.4%. However, non-sensitivity to penicillin, as the first-line antibiotic against N. meningitidis, was higher (27.2%). Altogether, the resistance to the first-line antibiotics (except penicillin) is still low indicating these drugs are effective against meningococcal meningitis. We also found a significant gap between MIC and disk diffusion for evaluating resistance to antibiotics in which disk diffusion overestimate the resistance rate.
CONCLUSIONS
To properly management and prevent the spread of N. miningitidis isolates resistant antibiotics, it is necessary to monitor the pattern of antibiotic susceptibility regionally and globally using the MIC methods.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Humans; Meningococcal Infections; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Neisseria meningitidis; Penicillins
PubMed: 35654713
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2022.05.005 -
The European Respiratory Journal Aug 2011Our aim was to systematically review and meta-analyse longitudinal studies on antibiotic use and subsequent development of wheeze and/or asthma with regards to study... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Our aim was to systematically review and meta-analyse longitudinal studies on antibiotic use and subsequent development of wheeze and/or asthma with regards to study quality, outcome measurement, reverse causation (RC; wheezing/asthma symptoms have caused prescription of antibiotics) and confounding by indication (CbI; respiratory tract infections leading to antibiotic use may be the underlying cause triggering asthma symptom development). English-language papers and studies published before November 1, 2010 with longitudinal observational design were included. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We identified 21 longitudinal studies. The effect of antibiotic use on wheeze/asthma risk varied between studies. 18 studies were eligible for meta-analysis showing pooled OR 1.27 (95% CI 1.12-1.43) for wheeze/asthma. When we eliminated studies with possible RC and CbI, the pooled risk estimate in the nine remaining studies was attenuated to OR 1.12 (95% CI 0.98-1.26). Definition of wheeze/asthma and age at follow-up differed between studies. Three studies focused on wheeze/asthma beyond 5-6 yrs of age with the presence of active symptoms and/or medication (pooled OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.93-1.23; dominated by one study). RC and CbI lead to overestimation of the association between antibiotic use and subsequent development of wheeze/asthma. Association was weak when fully adjusted for these types of bias. Heterogeneity of disease definition between studies could affect the results.
Topics: Adolescent; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Asthma; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Respiratory Sounds; Respiratory Tract Infections; Risk
PubMed: 21233272
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00105010 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Oct 2017Objective To determine the optimal duration and type of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing clean-contaminated resection for head and neck cancer. Data Sources... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Objective To determine the optimal duration and type of antibiotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing clean-contaminated resection for head and neck cancer. Data Sources Search strategies were created by a medical librarian, implemented in multiple databases, and completed in June 2016. Review Methods The population of interest was adults ≥18 years undergoing clean-contaminated head and neck surgery, intervention was postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, comparator was duration and types of antibiotics used, outcome was the wound infection rate, and the study design was randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies were excluded if not randomized, did not use systemic antibiotics, did not study wound infections, or included children. After excluding duplicates, the search strategy yielded 427 abstracts. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 67 studies were screened, leaving 19 RCTs for review. PRISMA guidelines were followed. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Results Meta-analysis of 340 patients in 4 RCTs showed that the pooled relative risk of wound infection was 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.61; P = .718; I = 0.0%) in patients receiving 1 day vs 5 days of prophylaxis. Conclusion This study provides evidence that there is no difference in the risk of wound infection with 1 day vs 5 days of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in clean-contaminated head and neck surgery, consistent with existing guidelines. Future large randomized trials are needed to more clearly define the appropriate choice of prophylaxis in penicillin-allergic patients.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Humans; Surgical Wound Infection
PubMed: 28695786
DOI: 10.1177/0194599817712215 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Feb 2023: Anecdotal evidence suggested variation in practices for antibiotic prescribing around dental procedures including route of administration of antibiotics, timing of the...
: Anecdotal evidence suggested variation in practices for antibiotic prescribing around dental procedures including route of administration of antibiotics, timing of the course prescribed (before, after or both), length of course prescribed, narrow vs. broad spectrum agents prescribed, use of single or combination of antibiotics, and the use of loading doses. This review aims to investigate this disparity of practices and the absence of global and local recent consensus on the most appropriate antibiotic interventions around invasive dental procedures. : Following PRISMA-P methodology, a systematic review of randomised controlled clinical trials was designed, reviewed, and entered on the PROSPERO website prior to commencement. Ethics approval was gained from the University of Wolverhampton Committee. Searches were performed using PubMed, Science Direct™, and the Cochrane Database, plus the bibliographies of studies identified. They investigated studies examining the efficacy and safety of any antibiotic regimen tested, independent of regimen used, versus a placebo, control, or no therapy, on outcomes in post third molar extraction. : The primary outcome of interest was postoperative infection and secondary outcomes were other post-surgical related complications of infectious nature and antibiotic adverse events. Sixteen RCTs were identified that met the selection criteria. Antibiotic use was reported to be safe, causing few adverse events. Meta-analysis of infection events showed antibiotics reduced the risk of an infection by 69%, but routine use for prophylaxis in uncomplicated procedures was not supported, and their role in patients with comorbidities or impaired immunity remains controversial. The effect on the incidence of dry socket showed no difference based upon regimen used. No significant benefit was found with respect to reduction of intraoral inflammation, wound dehiscence, haematoma, and lymphadenopathy. : The effect on postoperative pain reduction was inconclusive. Routine use of antibiotics around M3 extraction procedures is not supported, but their use in the presence of co-morbidities and or immunosuppression remains controversial to be confirmed by future studies.
Topics: Humans; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Molar, Third; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 36984426
DOI: 10.3390/medicina59030422