-
Clinical Toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) Dec 2014The Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning (EXTRIP) workgroup was created to provide evidence and consensus-based recommendations on the use of extracorporeal treatments... (Review)
Review
CONTEXT
The Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning (EXTRIP) workgroup was created to provide evidence and consensus-based recommendations on the use of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) in poisoning.
OBJECTIVES
To perform a systematic review and provide clinical recommendations for ECTR in carbamazepine poisoning.
METHODS
After a systematic literature search, the subgroup extracted the data and summarized the findings following a pre-determined format. The entire workgroup voted via a two-round modified Delphi method to reach a consensus on voting statements, using a RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method to quantify disagreement. Anonymous votes were compiled, returned, and discussed in person. A second vote determined the final recommendations.
RESULTS
Seventy-four articles met inclusion criteria. Articles included case reports, case series, descriptive cohorts, pharmacokinetic studies, and in-vitro studies; two poor-quality observational studies were identified, yielding a very low quality of evidence for all recommendations. Data on 173 patients, including 6 fatalities, were reviewed. The workgroup concluded that carbamazepine is moderately dialyzable and made the following recommendations: ECTR is suggested in severe carbamazepine poisoning (2D). ECTR is recommended if multiple seizures occur and are refractory to treatment (1D), or if life-threatening dysrhythmias occur (1D). ECTR is suggested if prolonged coma or respiratory depression requiring mechanical ventilation are present (2D) or if significant toxicity persists, particularly when carbamazepine concentrations rise or remain elevated, despite using multiple-dose activated charcoal (MDAC) and supportive measures (2D). ECTR should be continued until clinical improvement is apparent (1D) or the serum carbamazepine concentration is below 10 mg/L (42 the μ in μmol/L looks weird.) (2D). Intermittent hemodialysis is the preferred ECTR (1D), but both intermittent hemoperfusion (1D) or continuous renal replacement therapies (3D) are alternatives if hemodialysis is not available. MDAC therapy should be continued during ECTR (1D).
CONCLUSION
Despite the low quality of the available clinical evidence and the high protein binding capacity of carbamazepine, the workgroup suggested extracorporeal removal in cases of severe carbamazepine poisoning.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Child; Child, Preschool; Consensus; Delphi Technique; Drug Overdose; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Hemoperfusion; Humans; Infant; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Dialysis; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 25355482
DOI: 10.3109/15563650.2014.973572 -
Brain & Development May 2023Perampanel (PER) is a novel antiepileptic drug. The efficacy, tolerability and safety of PER in children and adolescents with epilepsy are still unclear. We aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Perampanel (PER) is a novel antiepileptic drug. The efficacy, tolerability and safety of PER in children and adolescents with epilepsy are still unclear. We aimed to study the efficacy and safety of PER in children and adolescents with epilepsy.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for relevant literature up to November 2022. Then we extracted the relevant data from eligible literature for systematic review and meta-analysis.
RESULT
Twenty-one studies involving 1968 children and adolescent patients were included. A reduction in seizure frequency of at least 50 percent occurred in 51.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] [47.1%, 55.9%]) of patients. Complete seizure cessation occurred in 20.6% (95%CI [16.7%, 25.4%]). The incidence of adverse events was 40.8% (95%CI [33.8%, 48.2%]). The most common adverse events were drowsiness 15.3% (95% CI [13.7%, 16.9%]), irritability 9.3% (95%CI [8.0%, 10.6%]), dizziness 8.4% (95% CI [7.2%, 9.7%]). The incidence of drug discontinuation due to adverse events was 9.2% (95% CI [7.0%, 11.5%]).
CONCLUSION
PER is generally well tolerated and effective in the treatment of epilepsy in children and adolescents. Larger studies are still needed to explore the application of PER in children and adolescents.
RISK OF BIAS AND LIMITATION
The funnel plot suggests that there may be publication bias in our meta-analysis, and most of the included studies were Asian, so there may be some racial differences.
Topics: Humans; Adolescent; Child; Treatment Outcome; Epilepsy; Seizures; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination
PubMed: 36878742
DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2023.02.007 -
Epilepsia Open Apr 2024Antiseizure medications (ASMs) constitute the principal of treatment for patients with epilepsy, where long-term treatment is usually necessary. The purpose of this... (Review)
Review
Antiseizure medications (ASMs) constitute the principal of treatment for patients with epilepsy, where long-term treatment is usually necessary. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide practical and useful information regarding various aspects of the interactions between ASMs and foods and drinks. MEDLINE and ScienceDirect, from the inception to July 15, 2023, were searched for related publications. In both electronic databases, the following search strategy was applied, and the following keywords were used (in title/abstract): "food OR drink" AND "antiepileptic OR antiseizure." The primary search yielded 738 studies. After implementing our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we could identify 19 studies on the issue of interest for our endeavor. Four studies were identified in the recheck process and not by the primary search. All studies provided low level of evidence. Interactions between foods and ASMs are a common phenomenon. Many factors may play a role for such an interaction to come to play; these include drug properties, administration route, and administration schedule, among others. Drugs-foods (-drinks) interactions may change the drug exposure or plasma levels of drugs (e.g., grapefruit juice increases carbamazepine concentrations and the bioavailability of cannabidiol is increased 4-5 folds with concomitant intake of fat-rich food); this may require dosage adjustments. Interactions between ASMs and foods and drinks may be important. This should be taken seriously into consideration when consulting patients and their caregivers about ASMs. Future well-designed investigations should explore the specific interactions between foods (and drinks) and ASMs to clarify whether they are clinically important. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Interactions between antiseizure medications and foods and drinks may be important. This should be taken into consideration in patients with epilepsy.
Topics: Humans; Anticonvulsants; Biological Availability; Benzodiazepines; Food; Epilepsy
PubMed: 38345419
DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12918 -
Clinical Pharmacokinetics Jul 2019Qualitative studies on drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between anticonvulsants and antibiotics report pharmacokinetic changes that may increase the clinical risks in terms... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Qualitative studies on drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between anticonvulsants and antibiotics report pharmacokinetic changes that may increase the clinical risks in terms of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and efficacy. However, no studies have provided a systematic and quantitative analysis of anticonvulsant-antibiotic pharmacokinetic DDIs. To provide such indications, we systematically and critically reviewed the literature on anticonvulsant-antibiotic DDIs in terms of quantitative pharmacokinetic changes and related ADRs. We also investigated less-known interactions for the possible occurrence of clinically relevant events.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of all reports of DDIs between anticonvulsants and antibiotics assessing pharmacokinetic parameters published until 9 June 2017.
RESULTS
We were able to meta-analyse the effect of macrolides on carbamazepine area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity [AUC] (+ 34.5 µg/mL*h, p = 0.005, n = 38), clearance (- 2.88 mL/min, p < 0.001, n = 46) and trough plasma concentration [Ct] (+ 8.0 µg/mL, p = 0.002, n = 23), and of carbapenems on valproic acid Ct (- 42.9 µg/mL, p < 0.001, n = 262). Pharmacokinetic parameters with other DDIs were insufficiently reported to allow a statistical analysis.
CONCLUSIONS
Therapeutic drug monitoring in patients receiving long-term antiepileptic therapies may help, in specific conditions, to improve safety while preserving efficacy. Such a procedure would also increase scientific information on how pharmacokinetic variations are associated with ADR occurrence, and possibly epileptological outcomes for those DDIs for which available information is suggestive of a relevant effect but is not yet sufficient to draw conclusions.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anticonvulsants; Drug Interactions; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 30406474
DOI: 10.1007/s40262-018-0720-z -
Neuroepidemiology 2014Since the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) report on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and suicide risk was released (2008), several studies have been published on this... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Since the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) report on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and suicide risk was released (2008), several studies have been published on this controversial relationship. This systematic review (SR) gives an updated approach to this health issue.
SUMMARY
We searched 6 databases. We ultimately included 11 publications: 4 cohort studies, 1 case-crossover study, 2 community case-control studies, and 4 SRs. Overall, 1 SR described studies already included; 3 studies reported a 2- to 4-fold overall increase in risk; 1 study reported an increased risk of suicide among epilepsy patients on AEDs with high risk of depression; 1study showed a protective effect among epilepsy patients; 2 studies were conducted with patients with bipolar disorder (1 showed a protective effect, whereas the other showed a 3-fold increase in risk of suicide), and the other 3 studies reported results for single AEDs. Several biases affected the published results.
KEY MESSAGES
There is no clear evidence of an association between the use of AEDs and an increased risk of suicide because of the heterogeneity in the studies at the clinical and methodological level. A future study should cover all indications for use, retrieve information from a healthcare database, and include a defined set of covariates to avoid bias.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Female; Humans; Male; Risk Factors; Suicide
PubMed: 24401764
DOI: 10.1159/000356807 -
Neurocirugia (English Edition) 2020It is common practice to prescribe prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AED) to high-grade glioma (HGG) patients without a history of seizures, yet with limited evidence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
It is common practice to prescribe prophylactic antiepileptic drugs (AED) to high-grade glioma (HGG) patients without a history of seizures, yet with limited evidence supporting its use. Ideally, the effectiveness of prophylactic anticonvulsants must outweigh the occurrence of adverse effects and interactions related to AED. The authors conducted a systematic review and metanalysis of longitudinal studies regarding the effectiveness of prophylactic AED in seizure-naïve HGG patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials, Embase and clinicaltrials.gov databases were systematically searched. Of the initial 1773 studies identified, 15 were finally selected for data extraction and analysis. Heterogeneity among studies, pooled hazard ratios, publication bias and sensitivity analyses were performed separately for a 15-study group (HGG patients within larger series of brain tumors) and a 6-study group (exclusively HGG patients).
RESULTS
AED prophylaxis did not significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative seizures compared with controls, both in the 15-study group (Mantel-Haenszel random-effects pooled OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.82-1.43, 2123 patients) and in the 6-study group (pooled OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.77-1.92, 540 patients). However, some issues (paucity of prospective trials, overall moderate-risk of bias, and few studies addressing HGG patients exclusively) preclude firm conclusions against routine prophylactic AED prescription. Reported adverse effects attributable to AED were acceptable in the majority of studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Within the limitations of this review, the results of this metanalysis do not support the routine administration of prophylactic AED to HGG patients without a history of seizures.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Glioma; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Prospective Studies; Seizures
PubMed: 32265156
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucir.2020.02.003 -
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and... Aug 2018Migraine is a common and costly neurological disorder that affects approximately 1 of every 7 people annually. Pharmacological therapy for prevention of migraine is... (Review)
Review
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE
Migraine is a common and costly neurological disorder that affects approximately 1 of every 7 people annually. Pharmacological therapy for prevention of migraine is warranted when patients experience at least 6 headache days, 4 headache days with at least some impairment or 3 headache days with severe impairment or requiring bed rest in a month. Levetiracetam is an antiepileptic drug that has the potential to be beneficial for migraine prophylaxis. The objective of this review was to assess the safety and efficacy of levetiracetam for migraine prophylaxis.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE (1946-August 2017), EMBASE (1947-August 2017) and CENTRAL using the terms: migraine disorders, migraine, or headache and etiracetam or levetiracetam. Animal studies, case reports, abstracts, letters to the editor and those not written in English were excluded.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Eleven articles were identified for inclusion. Of the studies included, 2 were retrospective chart reviews, 4 were randomized placebo- or active comparator-controlled trials, and the remaining 5 were prospective, open-label studies. All studies found a statistically significant decrease in headache frequency per month compared to baseline or placebo when used for treatment of episodic migraine (2.96-10.9 headache/mo decrease), and 57.9%-100% of patients had at least a 50% decrease in headache frequency from baseline. Significance was not consistently demonstrated in the prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine. The most common adverse effects noted included somnolence, dizziness and behavioural effects but generally did not require discontinuation.
WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION
The studies included in this review indicate that levetiracetam is well-tolerated and may be an alternative treatment option for episodic migraine prophylaxis. Additional clinical evidence is necessary to establish the efficacy of levetiracetam for the prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine.
Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Humans; Levetiracetam; Migraine Disorders; Piracetam; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29781197
DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12715 -
Sleep Medicine Reviews Jun 2021We sought to gain a better understanding of the relationship between epilepsy and sleep quality and daytime sleepiness by performing a literature search of PubMed for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We sought to gain a better understanding of the relationship between epilepsy and sleep quality and daytime sleepiness by performing a literature search of PubMed for case-control studies that compared patients with epilepsy to controls and reported the Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI) and/or the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). Study-specific mean differences in the PSQI and ESS between cases and controls were extracted from the publications and pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Twenty-five studies (2964 cases, 5232 controls) were included. Fifteen studies reported the PSQI and 24 the ESS. Mean age was 40 years; 50.4% were women. When comparing cases to controls, the pooled mean differences in the PSQI and ESS were 1.27 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76, 1.78; P < 0.001; I: 81.4%) and 0.38 (95% CI: -0.07, 0.84; P = 0.099; I: 81.0%). Subgroup analyses revealed that mean differences in the ESS were significantly lower in studies with a higher proportion of patients with focal epilepsy (P = 0.004). In this large-scale meta-analysis patients with epilepsy had a higher PSQI, close to the pathological cut-off, compared to controls, but a similar and unremarkable ESS. Further studies are needed to investigate potential effect modifiers, such as specific antiepileptic drugs or seizure frequency.
Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Sleep; Sleep Wake Disorders; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 33838598
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101466 -
Progress in Neuro-psychopharmacology &... Jun 2023Data on the ability of anticonvulsants and lithium to enter fetal and newborn circulation has become increasingly available; here we estimated penetration ratios in a...
OBJECTIVE
Data on the ability of anticonvulsants and lithium to enter fetal and newborn circulation has become increasingly available; here we estimated penetration ratios in a series of matrices from combined samples of pregnant/breastfeeding women treated with anticonvulsants or lithium.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed/EMBASE for studies with concentrations of anticonvulsants/lithium from maternal blood, amniotic fluid, umbilical cord blood and/or breast milk. Penetration ratios were calculated by dividing the concentrations in amniotic fluid, umbilical cord plasma or breast milk by the maternal concentrations. When data from multiple studies were available, we calculated combined penetration ratios, weighting studies' mean by study size.
RESULTS
Ninety-one eligible studies for brivaracetam, carbamazepine, clonazepam, ethosuximide, gabapentin, lacosamide, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, lithium, oxcarbazepine, perampanel, phenobarbital, phenytoin, pregabalin, primidone, topiramate, valproate, vigabatrin and zonisamide were identified. For amniotic fluid, the highest penetration ratios were estimated for levetiracetam (mean 3.56, range 1.27-5.85, n = 2) and lowest for valproate (mean 0.11, range 0.02-1.02, n = 57). For umbilical cord plasma, oxcarbazepine had the highest ratio (mean 1.59, range 0.11-4.33, n = 12) with clonazepam having the lowest (mean 0.55, range 0.52-0.59, n = 2). For breast milk, the highest ratios were observed for oxcarbazepine (mean 3.75, range 0.5-7.0, n = 2), whereas the lowest were observed for valproate (mean 0.04, range 0.01-0.22, n = 121).
DISCUSSION
We observed substantial variability between anticonvulsants and lithium regarding their ability to enter fetal/newborn circulation. Assessing concentrations of anticonvulsants and lithium in maternal samples can provide a surrogate of fetal/infant exposure, although patterns of concentration-dependent effects for maternal/neonatal safety are lacking.
Topics: Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Amniotic Fluid; Anticonvulsants; Fetal Blood; Lithium; Maternal-Fetal Exchange; Milk, Human
PubMed: 36805301
DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110733 -
Epilepsia May 2024We conducted a systematic review investigating the efficacy and tolerability of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and corticosteroids in children with epilepsies other... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We conducted a systematic review investigating the efficacy and tolerability of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and corticosteroids in children with epilepsies other than infantile epileptic spasm syndrome (IESS) that are resistant to anti-seizure medication (ASM). We included retrospective and prospective studies reporting on more than five patients and with clear case definitions and descriptions of treatment and outcome measures. We searched multiple databases and registries, and we assessed the risk of bias in the selected studies using a questionnaire based on published templates. Results were summarized with meta-analyses that pooled logit-transformed proportions or rates. Subgroup analyses and univariable and multivariable meta-regressions were performed to examine the influence of covariates. We included 38 studies (2 controlled and 5 uncontrolled prospective; 31 retrospective) involving 1152 patients. Meta-analysis of aggregate data for the primary outcomes of seizure response and reduction of electroencephalography (EEG) spikes at the end of treatment yielded pooled proportions (PPs) of 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.67) and 0.56 (95% CI 0.43-0.68). The relapse rate was high (PP 0.33, 95% CI 0.27-0.40). Group analyses and meta-regression showed a small benefit of ACTH and no difference between all other corticosteroids, a slightly better effect in electric status epilepticus in slow sleep (ESES) and a weaker effect in patients with cognitive impairment and "symptomatic" etiology. Obesity and Cushing's syndrome were the most common adverse effects, occurring more frequently in trials addressing continuous ACTH (PP 0.73, 95% CI 0.48-0.89) or corticosteroids (PP 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.85) than intermittent intravenous or oral corticosteroid administration (PP 0.05, 95% CI 0.02-0.10). The validity of these results is limited by the high risk of bias in most included studies and large heterogeneity among study results. This report was registered under International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) number CRD42022313846. We received no financial support.
Topics: Humans; Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Spasms, Infantile; Epileptic Syndromes; Treatment Outcome; Anticonvulsants; Infant; Child
PubMed: 38411568
DOI: 10.1111/epi.17918