-
Chest Aug 2017Programmed death 1 (PD-1) programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors show significant clinical activity in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, they are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Incidence of Pneumonitis With Use of Programmed Death 1 and Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Trials.
BACKGROUND
Programmed death 1 (PD-1) programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors show significant clinical activity in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). However, they are often associated with potentially fatal immune-mediated pneumonitis. Preliminary reports of trials suggest a difference in the rate of pneumonitis with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors. We sought to determine the overall incidence of pneumonitis and differences according to type of inhibitors and prior chemotherapy use.
METHODS
MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched up to November 2016. Rates of pneumonitis of any grade and grade ≥ 3 from all clinical trials investigating nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab as single agents in NSCLC were collected. The incidence of pneumonitis across trials was calculated using DerSimonian-Laird random effects models. We compared incidences between PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors and between treatment naive and previously treated patients.
RESULTS
Nineteen trials (12 with PD-1 inhibitors [n = 3,232] and 7 with PD-L1 inhibitors [n = 1,806]) were identified. PD-1 inhibitors were found to have statistically significant higher incidence of any grade pneumonitis compared with PD-L1 inhibitors (3.6%; 95% CI, 2.4%-4.9% vs 1.3%; 95% CI, 0.8%-1.9%, respectively; P = .001). PD-1 inhibitors were also associated with higher incidence of grade 3 or 4 pneumonitis (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.6%-1.7% vs 0.4%; 95% CI, 0%-0.8%; P = .02). Treatment naive patients had higher incidence of grade 1 through 4 pneumonitis compared with previously treated patients (4.3%; 95% CI, 2.4%-6.3% vs 2.8%; 95% CI, 1.7%- 4%; P = .03).
CONCLUSIONS
There was a higher incidence of pneumonitis with use of PD-1 inhibitors compared with PD-L1 inhibitors. Higher rate of pneumonitis was more common in treatment naive patients.
Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; B7-H1 Antigen; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Female; Humans; Immunotherapy; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Nivolumab; Pneumonia; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 28499515
DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.04.177 -
Clinical Microbiology and Infection :... Oct 2023Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) are increasingly used to treat haematological malignancies. Strategies for preventing infections in CAR-T-treated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Predicting infections in patients with haematological malignancies treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies: A systematic scoping review and narrative synthesis.
BACKGROUND
Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) are increasingly used to treat haematological malignancies. Strategies for preventing infections in CAR-T-treated patients rely on expert opinions and consensus guidelines.
OBJECTIVES
This scoping review aimed to identify risk factors for infections in CAR-T-treated patients with haematological malignancies.
DATA SOURCES
A literature search utilized MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane to identify relevant studies from conception until 30 September 2022.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Trials and observational studies were eligible.
PARTICIPANTS
Studies required ≥10 patients treated for haematological malignancy to report infection events (as defined by the study), and either (a) a descriptive, univariate or multivariate analysis of the relationship between infections event and a risk factors for infections, or (b) diagnostic performance of a biochemical/immunological marker in CAR-T-treated patients with infection.
METHODS
A scoping review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.
DATA SOURCES
A literature search utilised MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane to identify relevant studies from conception until September 30, 2022. Eligibility/Participants/Intervention: Trials and observational studies were eligible. Studies required ≥ 10 patients treated for haematological malignancy, to report infection events (as defined by the study), and either A) a descriptive, univariate or multivariate analysis of the relationship between infections event and a risk-factors for infections, or B) diagnostic performance of a biochemical/immunological marker in CAR-T treated patients with infection.
ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS
Bias assessment was undertaken according to Joanna Brigg's Institute criteria for observational studies.
METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS
Data were synthesized descriptively because of the heterogeneity of reporting.
RESULTS
A total of 1522 patients across 15 studies were identified. All-cause infections across haematological malignancies were associated with lines of prior therapy, steroid administration, immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity and treatment-emergent neutropenia. Procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and cytokine profiles did not reliably predict infections. Predictors of viral, bacterial and fungal infections were poorly canvassed.
DISCUSSION
Meta-analysis of the current literature is not possible because of significant heterogeneity in definitions of infections and risk factors, and small, underpowered cohort studies. Radical revision of how we approach reporting infections for novel therapies is required to promptly identify infection signals and associated risks in patients receiving novel therapies. Prior therapies, neutropenia, steroid administration and immune-effector cell-associated neurotoxicity remain the most associated with infections in CAR-T-treated patients.
Topics: Humans; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Hematologic Neoplasms; T-Lymphocytes; Steroids
PubMed: 37201866
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.05.011 -
Deutsches Arzteblatt International May 2018Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. The German S3 guideline of 2012 has now been updated to take account of advances in the early detection, diagnostic...
BACKGROUND
Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. The German S3 guideline of 2012 has now been updated to take account of advances in the early detection, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and follow-up care of this disease.
METHODS
The updating process was based on the adaptation of identified source guidelines and on reviews of the scientific evidence. A systematic search in multiple literature databases was carried out, and the full texts of the selected articles were evaluated. Suggested recommendations were then proposed by interdisciplinary working groups and modified and graded in a nominal consensus procedure.
RESULTS
The value of mammographic screening is confirmed in the updated guideline. As for the diagnostic evaluation of breast cancer, computed tomography is recommended for staging in patients with a high risk of recurrence, in addition to conventional methods. As for surgical treatment, the evidence supporting locoregional surgery for primary breast cancer now affords an opportunity for de-escalation: complete resection yields the best outcome, but a safety margin of several millimeters is not necessary. Axillary dissection is no longer recommended except in certain defined situations. Radiotherapeutic approaches consist of hypofractionated applications. Adjuvant systemic therapy is indicated for patients in certain high-risk situations defined by a constellation of factors including tumor grade, patient age, node status, Ki-67 antigen expression, hormone receptor status, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. All patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer should receive endocrine therapy. The indication for chemotherapy and/or anti-HER2 therapy should be determined in consideration of the expected benefit and side effects.
CONCLUSION
Consistent implementation of the recommendations in the newly updated guideline can help lessen morbidity and mortality from breast cancer. The actual extent to which breast cancer guidelines are implemented should be a topic of future research.
Topics: Aftercare; Aged; Biopsy, Needle; Breast Neoplasms; Drug Therapy; Female; Germany; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Mammography; Mass Screening; Middle Aged; Oncology Nursing; Radiography; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
PubMed: 29807560
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0316 -
International Journal of Medical... 2021Multiple myeloma (MM) is incurable in spite of recent treatment improvements, highlighting the development of new therapies. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Multiple myeloma (MM) is incurable in spite of recent treatment improvements, highlighting the development of new therapies. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has dramatically changed the therapeutic effectiveness in high-risk B-cell malignancies. For relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), preclinical evaluations of CAR-T therapy have shown promising efficacy, thus various active clinical trials are under way. Herein, we conducted this review to summarize efficacy and safety of CAR-T therapy and provide more evidence to guide clinical treatments. We systematically searched literature based on databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), and conference abstracts reported from American Society of Hematology (ASH), European Hematology Association (EHA) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), in addition to other sources (www.clinicaltrials.gov, article citations). Data assessed efficacy and safety of CAR-T therapy in patients with RRMM were extracted and evaluated, and then systematically analyzed by Comprehensive Meta-analysis 3.0 (CMA 3.0). A total of 23 studies including 350 participants from different countries, diagnosed as RRMM and treated with CAR-T therapy (containing 7 antigens targeted by CARs) were combined. In summary, we discovered the pooled overall response rate (77%), complete response rate (37%) and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate within responders (78%). Furthermore, the pooled relapse rate of responders was 38% and median progression-free survival was 8 months. The pooled survival rate was 87% at last follow-up (median, 12 months). In addition, the pooled grade 3-4 rates of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic toxicities (NT) were 14% and 13%, respectively. Our study suggests that CAR-T therapy has demonstrated efficacy and safety in RRMM patients. BCMA-targeted CAR-T and anti-BCMA contained regimen have shown better efficacy.
Topics: B-Cell Maturation Antigen; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Progression-Free Survival; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen
PubMed: 33746596
DOI: 10.7150/ijms.46811 -
Value in Health : the Journal of the... Apr 2024This study aimed to systematically review evidence on the cost-effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies for patients with cancer. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to systematically review evidence on the cost-effectiveness of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies for patients with cancer.
METHODS
Electronic databases were searched in October 2022 and updated in September 2023. Systematic reviews, health technology assessments, and economic evaluations that compared costs and effects of CAR-T therapy in patients with cancer were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, synthesized results, and critically appraised studies using the Philips checklist. Cost data were presented in 2022 US dollars.
RESULTS
Our search yielded 1809 records, 47 of which were included. Most of included studies were cost-utility analysis, published between 2018 and 2023, and conducted in the United States. Tisagenlecleucel, axicabtagene ciloleucel, idecabtagene vicleucel, ciltacabtagene autoleucel, lisocabtagene maraleucel, brexucabtagene autoleucel, and relmacabtagene autoleucel were compared with various standard of care chemotherapies. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for CAR-T therapies ranged from $9424 to $4 124 105 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in adults and from $20 784 to $243 177 per QALY in pediatric patients. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were found to improve over longer time horizons or when an earlier cure point was assumed. Most studies failed to meet the Philips checklist due to a lack of head-to-head comparisons and uncertainty surrounding CAR-T costs and curative effects.
CONCLUSIONS
CAR-T therapies were more expensive and generated more QALYs than comparators, but their cost-effectiveness was uncertain and dependent on patient population, cancer type, and model assumptions. This highlights the need for more nuanced economic evaluations and continued research to better understand the value of CAR-T therapies in diverse patient populations.
PubMed: 38641057
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.004 -
Cytotherapy Sep 2022The existing evidence about the impact of bridging therapy (BT) on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between bridging therapy and outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in patients with large B cell lymphoma.
BACKGROUND
The existing evidence about the impact of bridging therapy (BT) on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy in patients with large B cell lymphoma (LBCL) is conflicting. Therefore, we reviewed all available evidence to examine the association between BT and CAR-T therapy outcomes by systematic review and meta-analysis approach.
METHODS
Two reviewers independently searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library to identify all records that described BT for LBCL treated with CAR-T. We then applied a fixed- or random-effects meta-analysis to estimate the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and rate ratio (RRs) for efficacy and safety endpoints and assessed differences across various BT modalities. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate study quality.
RESULTS
Twenty-six reports from 24 studies involving 2014 patients were included in the analysis. Pooled results showed that patients requiring BT had significantly worse 1-year overall survival rate (RR = 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.85, P < 0.001), 1-year progression-free survival rate (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.60-0.85, P < 0.001), progression-free survival (HR = 1.35, 95% CI 1.07-1.69, P = 0.01), overall response rate (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.81-0.95, P = 0.001), complete response rate (RR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.65-0.93, P = 0.005), and grade ≥3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (RR = 1.43, 95% CI 1.10-1.87, P = 0.007), and tended to have poorer overall survival (HR = 1.42, 95% CI 0.99-2.02, P = 0.056) and grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (RR = 1.59, 95% CI 0.92-2.75, P = 0.096). Prolonged cytopenias were the common toxicity event associated with BT. Radiotherapy may serve as a promising BT option that can provide safe and effective disease control for patients with LBCL before CAR-T infusion. The inconsistency of patient baselines in the current study hindered further comparisons between different BT modalities. Most of the available evidence was rated as low quality because of concerns over low comparability.
CONCLUSION
BT appears to be associated with comparatively poor efficacy and safety outcomes after CAR-T infusion. However, due to the considerable heterogeneity between the BT and non-BT cohorts at disease baseline, no definitive conclusions can be made for the true impact of BT on CAR-T until further randomized studies are conducted.
Topics: Cell- and Tissue-Based Therapy; Cytokine Release Syndrome; Humans; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma, B-Cell; Progression-Free Survival; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35568624
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.03.009 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022We aimed to compare the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy with that of autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in relapsed/refractory...
BACKGROUND
We aimed to compare the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy with that of autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL).
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
We searched eligible publications up to January 31st, 2022, in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Springer, and Scopus. A total of 16 publications with 3484 patients were independently evaluated and analyzed using STATA SE software.
RESULTS
Patients who underwent CAR-T cell therapy showed a better overall response rate (ORR) and partial response (PR) than those treated with auto-HSCT (CAR-T vs. auto-HSCT, ORR: 80% vs. 73%, HR:0.90,95%CI:0.76-1.07, = 0.001; PR: 20% vs. 14%, HR:0.65,95%CI:0.62-0.68, = 0.034). No significant difference was observed in 6-month overall survival (OS) (CAR-T vs. auto-HSCT, six-month OS: 81% vs. 84%, HR:1.23,95%CI:0.63-2.38, = 0.299), while auto-HSCT showed a favorable 1 and 2-year OS (CAR-T vs. auto-HSCT, one-year OS: 64% vs. 73%, HR:2.42,95%CI:2.27-2.79, P < 0.001; two-year OS: 54% vs. 68%, HR:1.81,95%CI:1.78-1.97, P < 0.001). Auto-HSCT also had advantages in progression-free survival (PFS) (CAR-T vs. auto-HSCT, six-month PFS: 53% vs. 76%, HR:2.81,95%CI:2.53-3.11, < 0.001; one-year PFS: 46% vs. 61%, HR:1.84,95%CI:1.72-1.97, < 0.001; two-year PFS: 42% vs. 54%, HR:1.62,95%CI:1.53-1.71, < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by age, prior lines of therapy, and ECOG scores was performed to compare the efficacy of both treatment modalities.
CONCLUSION
Although CAR-T cell therapy showed a beneficial ORR, auto-HSCT exhibited a better long-term treatment superiority in R/R DLBCL patients. Survival outcomes were consistent across different subgroups.
Topics: Humans; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Transplantation, Autologous; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse; Stem Cell Transplantation
PubMed: 36733398
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1041177 -
Experimental Hematology & Oncology Aug 2023Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is one of the most promising advances in cancer treatment. It is based on genetically modified T cells to express a CAR,... (Review)
Review
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy is one of the most promising advances in cancer treatment. It is based on genetically modified T cells to express a CAR, which enables the recognition of the specific tumour antigen of interest. To date, CAR-T cell therapies approved for commercialisation are designed to treat haematological malignancies, showing impressive clinical efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced-stage tumours. However, since they all use the patient´s own T cells as starting material (i.e. autologous use), they have important limitations, including manufacturing delays, high production costs, difficulties in standardising the preparation process, and production failures due to patient T cell dysfunction. Therefore, many efforts are currently being devoted to contribute to the development of safe and effective therapies for allogeneic use, which should be designed to overcome the most important risks they entail: immune rejection and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). This systematic review brings together the wide range of different approaches that have been studied to achieve the production of allogeneic CAR-T cell therapies and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of every strategy. The methods were classified in two major categories: those involving extra genetic modifications, in addition to CAR integration, and those relying on the selection of alternative cell sources/subpopulations for allogeneic CAR-T cell production (i.e. γδ T cells, induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), umbilical cord blood T cells, memory T cells subpopulations, virus-specific T cells and cytokine-induced killer cells). We have observed that, although genetic modification of T cells is the most widely used approach, new approaches combining both methods have emerged. However, more preclinical and clinical research is needed to determine the most appropriate strategy to bring this promising antitumour therapy to the clinical setting.
PubMed: 37605218
DOI: 10.1186/s40164-023-00435-w -
Annals of Translational Medicine May 2022As a successful treatment for hematological malignancy, chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) have been expanded to solid tumors to demonstrate their safety...
BACKGROUND
As a successful treatment for hematological malignancy, chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T cells) have been expanded to solid tumors to demonstrate their safety and efficacy, especially for digestive system cancer (DSC). Various CAR-T cell constructs used in different types of DSCs result in heterogeneous responses. Thus, we aimed to systematically summarize the clinical response of DSCs treated with CAR-T cells and investigate factors associated with heterogeneity in outcomes.
METHODS
Clinical studies of DSC patients treated with CAR-T cell therapy were selected from the PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science databases before October 1, 2020. "CAR-T cell", "solid tumor" and their synonymous terms were used to construct the search strategy. Duplicates, reviews, non-English literature, articles not related to clinical studies or CAR-T cells used for digestive tumors were excluded. The included studies were assessed by the Institute of Health Economics (IHE) risk of bias tool to check the methodological quality. The inverse variance method was used to perform data pooling and subgroup analysis to clarify the causes of heterogeneity. Publication bias was examined by funnel plots and Egger's test.
RESULTS
Twelve studies were included, and the risk of bias evaluation was demonstrated as plots using Review Manager 5.3. The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 2% (95% CI: 0-6%), and the clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 42% (95% CI: 24-61%). According to subgroup analysis, costimulation (P=0.0449), lymphodepletion (P=0.0002), persistence of CAR-T cells (P=0.0443) and transduction method (P=0.0165) were factors contributing to heterogeneity. For adverse effects, pyrexia was the most frequent (35%, 95% CI: 24-61%). No publication bias was found, and the major results were robust within a slight fluctuation for each removal of one of the 12 studies.
DISCUSSION
CAR-T cell therapy is generally beneficial for patients with DSCs though the ORR was still poor. Modified construction with more specific tumor antigens, costimulatory domain and lentiviral vectors is necessary to obtain a better antitumor response of CAR-T cell therapy. Information of survival data are needed for a more comprehensive analysis.
PubMed: 35928759
DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-5019 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022To investigate the effectiveness and safety of using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies targeting CD19 in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma...
Effectiveness and Safety of Anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cell Immunotherapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
To investigate the effectiveness and safety of using chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies targeting CD19 in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for reports published from database inception up to July 2021. The present meta-analysis included clinical response outcomes, survival outcomes, and safety analyses. For qualitative analysis that could not be combined, the data were presented in a tabular form. Subgroup analyses were also performed according to the costimulatory domains, generic names, and study designs. Twenty-seven studies (1,687 patients) were included. The pooled 12-months overall survival (OS) rate was 63% (95%CI: 56-70%). The pooled best overall response (BOR) was 74.0% (95%CI: 67-79%), with a best complete response (BCR) of 48% (95%CI: 42-54%) and a 3-months CR rate (CRR) of 41% (95%CI: 35-47%). The subgroup analyses by costimulatory domain suggested statistically significant differences in BOR and BCR, whereas not in the 12-months OS rate and 3-months CRR. Among the patients evaluable for safety, 78% (95%CI: 68-87%), 6% (95%CI: 3-10%), 41% (95%CI: 31-52%), and 16% (95%CI: 10-24%) experienced cytokine release syndrome (CRS), severe CRS, neurotoxicity, and severe neurotoxicity, respectively. Compared with the CD28 costimulatory domain, the 4-1BB-based products showed a better safety profile on any-grade CRS ( < 0.01), severe CRS ( = 0.04), any-grade neurotoxicity ( < 0.01), and severe neurotoxicity ( < 0.01). Anti-CD19 CAR-T cell immunotherapy has promising effectiveness and tolerable severe AE profile in DLBCL patients. 4-1BB-based CAR-T cells have a similar 12-months OS rate and 3-months CRR with CD28-based products but a better safety profile. The costimulatory domain might not affect the survival outcomes.
PubMed: 35548364
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.834113