-
Transplantation Proceedings Jun 2011Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is an important complication of transplantation. Risk factors include increased overall immunosuppression... (Review)
Review
Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is an important complication of transplantation. Risk factors include increased overall immunosuppression exposure and inadequate antiviral prophylaxis; however, the effects of T-cell-depleting agents on PTLD are unclear. A systematic literature review was conducted to assess PTLD in clinical studies published 1999-2009 in transplant patients with ≥ 3 years follow-up who received Thymoglobulin for induction. Twenty studies were identified (12 kidney, 7 heart, and 1 liver), of which 3 were excluded for insufficient PTLD reporting. The final study group comprised 2,246 kidney and heart transplant recipients (liver study excluded) who received Thymoglobulin. At a median follow-up of 5 years, the incidence of PTLD was 0.98% (kidney, 0.93%; heart, 1.05%) among Thymoglobulin-treated patients. The cumulative Thymoglobulin dose reported in these studies was not associated with the development of PTLD (P = NS). However, incidence of PTLD was significantly lower with antiviral prophylaxis (0.63%) than without (1.87%; P = .013). Heart transplant recipients not receiving antiviral prophylaxis had the highest PTLD incidence, possibly attributable to a greater overall immunosuppressive burden. This analysis revealed that PTLD incidences in kidney and heart transplant recipients receiving Thymoglobulin were low overall and perhaps related more to concomitant anti-viral prophylaxis use.
Topics: Antilymphocyte Serum; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Lymphoproliferative Disorders
PubMed: 21693205
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.03.036 -
Clinical Transplantation 2013Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) has shown efficacy in preventing acute GVHD (aGVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), but its efficacy in chronic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Long-term outcomes of antithymocyte globulin in patients with hematological malignancies undergoing myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) has shown efficacy in preventing acute GVHD (aGVHD) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), but its efficacy in chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and long-term outcomes remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate potential benefit and risk of prophylactic ATG use in myeloablative HCT. We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and included 10 trials (two RCTs and eight retrospective) comparing ATG use vs. control with a total of 1859 patients. The median follow-ups were over two yr. Outcomes assessed included overall cGVHD, extensive cGVHD, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, relapse, and causes of death. Our results showed ATG significantly decreased overall cGVHD (RR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.53-0.66, p < 0.00001), extensive cGVHD (RR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.25-0.47, p < 0.00001). Pooled results also showed ATG use was associated with a marginal increased risk of relapse (RR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.01-1.63, p = 0.04), and a non-inferior OS (HR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.74-1.01, p = 0.06). We conclude prophylactic use of ATG exerts a favorable effect in reducing cGVHD without survival impairment in a long term, although a higher relapse rate is a major threat.
Topics: Antilymphocyte Serum; Chronic Disease; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Models, Statistical; Postoperative Complications; Transplantation, Homologous; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 23383989
DOI: 10.1111/ctr.12091 -
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy Sep 2021This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to explore the association between rabbit thymoglobulin (rATG) doses and transplant-related efficacy and safety... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to explore the association between rabbit thymoglobulin (rATG) doses and transplant-related efficacy and safety outcomes.
METHODS
We searched PubMed and Scopus databases from inception up to June 2020. The primary efficacy and safety endpoints in kidney transplant recipients were evaluated.
RESULTS
Data of 23 cohort studies (3457 patients) and three RCTs (154 patients) were extracted and analyzed. rATG doses of ≤4.5 m/kg was associated with lower rates of biopsy proven acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, BK virus infection, and malignancy with a comparable rate of delayed graft function, patients' mortality, and death-censored graft loss compared to rATG total doses of 4.5-6 mg/kg or more than 6 mg/kg. The rATG doses of 3-4.5 mg/kg was associated with better outcomes in dose-response analysis.
EXPERT OPINION
Cumulative rATG induction doses as much as 3-4.5 mg/kg is as effective as higher doses regarding to allograft and patient outcomes while minimizing potential adverse effects in kidney transplant recipients.
Topics: Antilymphocyte Serum; Graft Rejection; Graft Survival; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney; Kidney Transplantation; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34304664
DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2021.1960978 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2023Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an established treatment for many malignant and non-malignant haematological disorders. Graft-versus-host... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is an established treatment for many malignant and non-malignant haematological disorders. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), a condition frequently occurring after an allogeneic SCT, is the result of host tissues being attacked by donor immune cells. It affects more than half of the patients after transplant either as acute and or chronic GVHD. One strategy for the prevention of GVHD is the administration of anti-thymocyte globulins (ATGs), a set of polyclonal antibodies directed against a variety of immune cell epitopes, leading to immunosuppression and immunomodulation.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effect of ATG used for the prevention of GVHD in patients undergoing allogeneic SCT with regard to overall survival, incidence and severity of acute and chronic GVHD, incidence of relapse, non-relapse mortality, graft failure and adverse events.
SEARCH METHODS
For this update we searched the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, trial registers and conference proceedings on the 18th November 2022 along with reference checking and contacting study authors to identify additional studies. We did not apply language restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the impact of ATG on GVHD prophylaxis in adults suffering from haematological diseases and undergoing allogeneic SCT. The selection criteria were modified from the previous version of this review. Paediatric studies and studies where patients aged < 18 years constituted more than 20 % of the total number were excluded. Treatment arms had to differ only in the addition of ATG to the standard GVHD prophylaxis regimen.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration for data collection, extraction and analyses.
MAIN RESULTS
For this update we included seven new RCTs, leading to a total of ten studies investigating 1413 participants. All patients had a haematological condition which warranted an allogeneic SCT. The risk of bias was estimated as low for seven and unclear for three studies. ATG probably has little or no influence on overall survival (HR (hazard ratio) 0.93 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 1.13, nine studies, n = 1249, moderate-certainty evidence)). Estimated absolute effect: 430 surviving people per 1000 people not receiving ATG compared to 456 people surviving per 1000 people receiving the intervention (95 % CI 385 to 522 per 1000 people). ATG results in a reduction in acute GVHD II to IV with relative risk (RR) 0.68 (95 % CI 0.60 to 0.79, 10 studies, n = 1413, high-certainty evidence). Estimated absolute effect: 418 acute GVHD II to IV per 1000 people not receiving ATG compared to 285 per 1000 people receiving the intervention (95 % CI 251 to 331 per 1000 people). Addition of ATG results in a reduction of overall chronic GvHD with a RR of 0.53 (95 % CI 0.45 to 0.61, eight studies, n = 1273, high-certainty evidence). Estimated absolute effect: 506 chronic GVHD per 1000 people not receiving ATG compared to 268 per 1000 people receiving the intervention (95 % CI 228 to 369 per 1000 people). Further data on severe acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD are available in the manuscript. ATG probably slightly increases the incidence of relapse with a RR of 1.21 (95 % CI 0.99 to 1.49, eight studies, n =1315, moderate-certainty evidence). Non relapse mortality is probably slightly or not affected by ATG with an HR of 0.86 (95 % CI 0.67 to 1.11, nine studies, n=1370, moderate-certainty evidence). ATG prophylaxis may result in no increase in graft failure with a RR of 1.55 (95 % CI 0.54 to 4.44, eight studies, n = 1240, low-certainty evidence). Adverse events could not be analysed due to the serious heterogeneity in the reporting between the studies, which limited comparability (moderate-certainty evidence) and are reported in a descriptive manner. Subgroup analyses on ATG types, doses and donor type are available in the manuscript.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review suggests that the addition of ATG during allogeneic SCT probably has little or no influence on overall survival. ATG results in a reduction in the incidence and severity of acute and chronic GvHD. ATG intervention probably slightly increases the incidence of relapse and probably does not affect the non relapse mortality. Graft failure may not be affected by ATG prophylaxis. Analysis of data on adverse events was reported in a narrative manner. A limitation for the analysis was the imprecision in reporting between the studies thereby reducing the confidence in the certainty of evidence.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Child; Bone Marrow Transplantation; Antilymphocyte Serum; Graft vs Host Disease; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome
PubMed: 37341189
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009159.pub3 -
Acta Haematologica 2008Immunosuppression is the therapeutic alternative for patients with aplastic anemia who are ineligible for allogeneic transplant. We aimed to assess the benefit of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Immunosuppression is the therapeutic alternative for patients with aplastic anemia who are ineligible for allogeneic transplant. We aimed to assess the benefit of the combination of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine (CsA).
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials that compared ATG and CsA to ATG alone as first-line treatment for patients with severe and nonsevere aplastic anemia. The Cochrane Library, Medline, conference proceedings and references were searched until 2008. Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for each trial and pooled.
RESULTS
Our search yielded 4 trials. For patients with severe aplastic anemia, there was a significant reduction in mortality in the ATG and CsA arm, which began at 3 months (RR = 0.50, 95% CI 0.29-0.85) and was maintained over a long follow-up of 5 years (RR = 0.58, 95 % CI 0.36-0.93). Conversely, in patients with nonsevere aplastic anemia, there was no difference in mortality.
CONCLUSIONS
The combination of both drugs should be considered the gold standard only for patients with severe aplastic anemia.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia, Aplastic; Antilymphocyte Serum; Child; Child, Preschool; Cyclosporine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 19246887
DOI: 10.1159/000203403 -
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology Jun 2018The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of basiliximab versus antithymocyte globulin for induction therapy in renal allograft. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of basiliximab versus antithymocyte globulin for induction therapy in renal allograft.
METHODS
Medline (PubMed), Embase, Ovid, Cochrane, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature databases were searched to identify prospective randomized controlled trials that compared basiliximab with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) for induction therapy in renal transplantation. RevMan 5.1 software and Stat Manager V4.1 software were used for the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Eight RCTs were included, including a total of 1153 patients. Of these, 547 (47%) had received basiliximab, and 606 (53%) had received ATG. The pooled results revealed that the basiliximab had a lower rate of neoplasm compared with ATG [odds ratio (OR) 0.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.78; P = 0.02]. There were no significant differences between the two drugs regarding 1-year acute rejection rate (OR 1.32; 95% CI 0.93-1.87; P = 0.13), 1-year graft survival rate (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.45-1.18; P = 0.20), 1-year patient survival rate (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.27-1.02; P = 0.06), 1-year infection rate (OR 0.90; 95% CI 0.48-1.68; P = 0.73).
CONCLUSION
Induction therapy of basiliximab has similar short-time effects on the recipients in renal transplantation compared with that of ATG. However, regarding the long-term effect, as represented by the rate of neoplasm, basiliximab has a significant advantage.
Topics: Allografts; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antilymphocyte Serum; Basiliximab; Graft Rejection; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney Transplantation; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Fusion Proteins
PubMed: 28986715
DOI: 10.1007/s10157-017-1480-z -
The Journal of Surgical Research Jun 2024Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is the transplantation of multiple tissue types as a solution for devastating injuries. Despite the highly encouraging... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) is the transplantation of multiple tissue types as a solution for devastating injuries. Despite the highly encouraging functional outcomes of VCA, the consequences of long-term immunosuppression remain the main obstacle in its application. In this review, we provide researchers and surgeons with a summary of the latest advances in the field of cell-based therapies for VCA tolerance.
METHODS
Four electronic databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature , and Web of Science. We used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis as the basis of our organization.
RESULTS
Hematopoietic stem cells prolonged VCA survival. A combination of immature dendritic cells and tacrolimus was superior to tacrolimus alone. T cell Ig domain and mucin domain modified mature dendritic cells increased VCA tolerance. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells prolonged survival of VCAs. A combination of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 immunoglobulin, and antilymphocyte serum significantly improved VCA tolerance. Ex-vivo allotransplant perfusion with recipient's bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells increased VCA survival. Recipient's adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and systemic immunosuppression prolonged VCA survival more than any of those agents alone. Additionally, a combination of peripheral blood mononuclear cells shortly incubated in mitomycin and cyclosporine significantly improved VCA survival. Finally, a combination of donor recipient chimeric cells, anti-αβ-T cell receptor (TCR), and cyclosporine significantly prolonged VCA tolerance.
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence from animal studies shows that cell-based therapies can prolong survival of VCAs. However, there remain many obstacles for these therapies, and they require rigorous clinical research given the rarity of the subjects and the complexity of the therapies. The major limitations of cell-based therapies include the need for conditioning with immunosuppressive drugs and radiation, causing significant toxicity. Safety concerns also persist as most research is on animal models. While completely replacing traditional immunosuppression with cell-based methods is unlikely soon, these therapies could reduce the need for high doses of immunosuppressants and improve VCA tolerance.
PubMed: 38851085
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.04.079 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2013Heart transplantation has become a valuable and well-accepted treatment option for end-stage heart failure. Rejection of the transplanted heart by the recipient's body... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Heart transplantation has become a valuable and well-accepted treatment option for end-stage heart failure. Rejection of the transplanted heart by the recipient's body is a risk to the success of the procedure, and life-long immunosuppression is necessary to avoid this. Clear evidence is required to identify the best, safest and most effective immunosuppressive treatment strategy for heart transplant recipients. To date, there is no consensus on the use of immunosuppressive antibodies against T-cells for induction after heart transplantation.
OBJECTIVES
To review the benefits, harms, feasibility and tolerability of immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction versus placebo, or no antibody induction, or another kind of antibody induction for heart transplant recipients.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 11, 2012), MEDLINE (Ovid) (1946 to November Week 1 2012), EMBASE (Ovid) (1946 to 2012 Week 45), ISI Web of Science (14 November 2012); we also searched two clinical trial registers and checked reference lists in November 2012.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all randomised clinical trials (RCTs) assessing immunosuppressive T-cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients. Within individual trials, we required all participants to receive the same maintenance immunosuppressive therapy.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors extracted data independently. RevMan analysis was used for statistical analysis of dichotomous data with risk ratio (RR), and of continuous data with mean difference (MD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Methodological components were used to assess risks of systematic errors (bias). Trial sequential analysis was used to assess the risks of random errors (play of chance). We assessed mortality, acute rejection, infection, Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, cancer, adverse events, chronic allograft vasculopathy, renal function, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidaemia.
MAIN RESULTS
In this review, we included 22 RCTs that investigated the use of T-cell antibody induction, with a total of 1427 heart-transplant recipients. All trials were judged to be at a high risk of bias. Five trials, with a total of 606 participants, compared any kind of T-cell antibody induction versus no antibody induction; four trials, with a total of 576 participants, compared interleukin-2 receptor antagonist (IL-2 RA) versus no induction; one trial, with 30 participants, compared monoclonal antibody (other than IL-2 RA) versus no antibody induction; two trials, with a total of 159 participants, compared IL-2 RA versus monoclonal antibody (other than IL-2 RA) induction; four trials, with a total of 185 participants, compared IL-2 RA versus polyclonal antibody induction; seven trials, with a total of 315 participants, compared monoclonal antibody (other than IL-2 RA) versus polyclonal antibody induction; and four trials, with a total of 162 participants, compared polyclonal antibody induction versus another kind, or dose of polyclonal antibodies.No significant differences were found for any of the comparisons for the outcomes of mortality, infection, CMV infection, post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder, cancer, adverse events, chronic allograft vasculopathy, renal function, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or hyperlipidaemia. Acute rejection occurred significantly less frequently when IL-2 RA induction was compared with no induction (93/284 (33%) versus 132/292 (45%); RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.90; I(2) 57%) applying the fixed-effect model. No significant difference was found when the random-effects model was applied (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.17; I(2) 57%). In addition, acute rejection occurred more often statistically when IL-2 RA induction was compared with polyclonal antibody induction (24/90 (27%) versus 10/95 (11%); RR 2.43; 95% CI 1.01 to 5.86; I(2) 28%). For all of these differences in acute rejection, trial sequential alpha-spending boundaries were not crossed and the required information sizes were not reached when trial sequential analysis was performed, indicating that we cannot exclude random errors.We observed some occasional significant differences in adverse events in some of the comparisons, however definitions of adverse events varied between trials, and numbers of participants and events in these outcomes were too small to allow definitive conclusions to be drawn.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review shows that acute rejection might be reduced by IL-2 RA compared with no induction, and by polyclonal antibody induction compared with IL-2 RA, though trial sequential analyses cannot exclude random errors, and the significance of our observations depended on the statistical model used. Furthermore, this review does not show other clear benefits or harms associated with the use of any kind of T-cell antibody induction compared with no induction, or when one type of T-cell antibody is compared with another type of antibody. The number of trials investigating the use of antibodies against T-cells for induction after heart transplantation is small, and the number of participants and outcomes in these RCTs is limited. Furthermore, the included trials are at a high risk of bias. Hence, more RCTs are needed to assess the benefits and harms of T-cell antibody induction for heart-transplant recipients. Such trials ought to be conducted with low risks of systematic and random error.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antilymphocyte Serum; Basiliximab; Daclizumab; Graft Rejection; Heart Transplantation; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Immunosuppression Therapy; Muromonab-CD3; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Interleukin-2; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; T-Lymphocytes
PubMed: 24297433
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008842.pub2 -
Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Aug 2021With the increasing number of non-matched donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCTs) has come increasing evidence regarding factors affecting graft outcomes.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
With the increasing number of non-matched donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (HSCTs) has come increasing evidence regarding factors affecting graft outcomes. One factor affecting graft outcomes currently being evaluated is anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). In this, we analyzed the clinical relevance of anti-HLA DSAs in patients who have undergone HSCT at a population level by conducting a systematic review of existing literature. A comprehensive search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library, and Web of Science from inception to January 1, 2021. A meta-analysis was performed of the association between anti-HLA DSAs and primary graft failure (PGF) with further subgroup analyses. The search was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 920 eligible citations were identified, out of which 15 studies were included in the final meta-analyses after application of rigorous selection criteria and independent review. A total of 2436 patients were included in these 15 studies. Patients with anti-HLA DSAs prior to undergoing HSCT had a 7.47-fold increased risk of PGF failure compared with patients without anti-HLA DSAs (odds ratio, 7.47; 95% confidence interval, 4.54 to 12.28, P < .001; I= 28.91%, P = .1315). In subgroup and meta-regression analyses, area, Newcastle Ottawa Scale score, mean fluorescence intensity cutoff, primary disease, HSCT type, graft source, and pretransplantation desensitization did not affect the impact of anti-HLA DSAs on PGF. There also was no significant difference in impact between HLA class I and II on PGF. We conclude that the prior presence of anti-HLA DSAs has a negative impact on graft outcomes in recipients of haploidentical and umbilical cord blood HSCT.
Topics: Antibodies; Antilymphocyte Serum; HLA Antigens; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Tissue Donors
PubMed: 33989833
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.04.030 -
PloS One 2023Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) has been used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) has been used in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) for graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis. Since the best dose has not been defined yet, this study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of different doses of ATG in Allo-HSCT. Data sources were MEDLINE/PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, LILACS, and SciELO. Studies were eligible when comparing doses of ATG. The higher dose was in the intervention group. A total of 22 articles (2002-2022) were included. Higher doses (4-12 mg/kg) of ATG-T reduced the incidence of grade III-IV acute GvHD (RR 0.60; 95%CI 0.42-0.84) and limited chronic GvHD (RR 0.64 95%CI 0.45-0.92) compared with lower doses (2-7.5 mg/kg). Higher doses increased the Epstein-Barr virus (RR 1.90 95% CI 1.49-2.42) and Cytomegalovirus reactivation (RR, 1.30; 95% CI 1.03-1.64). Relapse rates were higher in the higher dose group (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.07-167). The ATG-T dose ≥7mg/kg versus the lower dose showed a number needed to treat 7.4 for acute GvHD III-IV, with a number to harm of 7.7 for relapse at one year in the higher dose group. A dose lower than 7 mg/kg suggests a better risk-benefit ratio than a higher one. Well-designed RCT is needed to define the best risk-benefit doses. Trial registration: Trial registration number: PROSPERO: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020173449.
Topics: Humans; Antilymphocyte Serum; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Transplantation, Homologous; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Recurrence; Graft vs Host Disease; Chronic Disease; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37071663
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284476