-
JAMA Oct 2015Pericarditis is the most common form of pericardial disease and a relatively common cause of chest pain. (Review)
Review
IMPORTANCE
Pericarditis is the most common form of pericardial disease and a relatively common cause of chest pain.
OBJECTIVE
To summarize published evidence on the causes, diagnosis, therapy, prevention, and prognosis of pericarditis.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
A literature search of BioMedCentral, Google Scholar, MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was performed for human studies without language restriction from January 1, 1990, to August 31, 2015. After literature review and selection of meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, and large observational studies, 30 studies (5 meta-analyses, 10 randomized clinical trials, and 16 cohort studies) with 7569 adult patients were selected for inclusion.
FINDINGS
The etiology of pericarditis may be infectious (eg, viral and bacterial) or noninfectious (eg, systemic inflammatory diseases, cancer, and post-cardiac injury syndromes). Tuberculosis is a major cause of pericarditis in developing countries but accounts for less than 5% of cases in developed countries, where idiopathic, presumed viral causes are responsible for 80% to 90% of cases. The diagnosis is based on clinical criteria including chest pain, a pericardial rub, electrocardiographic changes, and pericardial effusion. Certain features at presentation (temperature >38°C [>100.4°F], subacute course, large effusion or tamponade, and failure of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug [NSAID] treatment) indicate a poorer prognosis and identify patients requiring hospital admission. The most common treatment for idiopathic and viral pericarditis in North America and Europe is NSAID therapy. Adjunctive colchicine can ameliorate the initial episode and is associated with approximately 50% lower recurrence rates. Corticosteroids are a second-line therapy for those who do not respond, are intolerant, or have contraindications to NSAIDs and colchicine. Recurrences may occur in 30% of patients without preventive therapy.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Pericarditis is the most common form of pericardial disease worldwide and may recur in as many as one-third of patients who present with idiopathic or viral pericarditis. Appropriate triage and treatment with NSAIDs may reduce readmission rates for pericarditis. Treatment with colchicine can reduce recurrence rates.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Chest Pain; Cohort Studies; Colchicine; Humans; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Pericardial Effusion; Pericarditis; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Symptom Assessment; Treatment Failure
PubMed: 26461998
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.12763 -
European Urology Focus Jan 2023Two recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported overall survival benefit of triplet therapy (androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy agent [ARAT], docetaxel, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
Two recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reported overall survival benefit of triplet therapy (androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy agent [ARAT], docetaxel, and androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) over that of doublet therapy (docetaxel and ADT) in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Ranking of therapy options and comparisons between triplet therapy and doublet ARAT and ADT therapy are scarce.
OBJECTIVE
To rank therapy options (triplet vs doublet [docetaxel and ADT] vs doublet [ARAT and ADT]) and address them within formal network meta-analyses (NMAs); subsequently, NMAs were refitted following stratification according to (1) low- and high-volume tumor burden and (2) doublet versus triplet therapy.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
A systematic literature review (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane database) of RCT trials that investigated the overall survival efficacy of systemic treatment in the setting of mHSPC was conducted. The study search and inclusion criteria were in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Ten RCTs (n = 9702) were identified. The NMA focusing on the overall cohort of mHSPC demonstrated that triplet therapies (darolutamide, docetaxel, and ADT, and abiraterone, docetaxel, and ADT) were ranked first and second (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.66; HR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.46-0.78), followed by doublet therapy (ARAT and ADT) and lastly docetaxel and ADT. Owing to missing data within one RCT, the NMA for low- and high-volume mHSPC focused on nine trials. In high-volume disease, triplet therapy (abiraterone, docetaxel, and ADT) was ranked first (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.38-0.71).
CONCLUSIONS
Triplet therapy, consisting of an ARAT, docetaxel, and ADT, ranked first in systematic treatment in mHSPC. Moreover, triplet therapy might result in more pronounced overall survival benefit than doublet ARAT and ADT therapy in high-volume mHSPC.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We compared different systemic therapy options for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and concluded that triplet therapy, consisting of androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy agent, docetaxel, and androgen deprivation therapy, seems to be most beneficial for overall survival. Back to top.
Topics: Male; Humans; Docetaxel; Network Meta-Analysis; Androgens; Receptors, Androgen; Androgen Antagonists; Treatment Outcome; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Prostatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 36058809
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.08.007 -
Future Cardiology Aug 2022Colchicine, a microtubule-disassembling (antitubulin) agent used for centuries for the treatment of gout and autoimmune diseases, is a drug of growing interest in the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Colchicine, a microtubule-disassembling (antitubulin) agent used for centuries for the treatment of gout and autoimmune diseases, is a drug of growing interest in the cardiovascular field. While in the last decades it has become cornerstone of pericarditis treatment, it has also emerged in the last few years as a promising drug in the management of coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation and heart failure. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of colchicine in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Systematic search in electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, BioMed Central, the Cochrane Collaboration Database of Randomized Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Google Scholar) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to February 2021. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to assess the risk of cardiovascular events, defined according to clinical setting. Among 15,569 pooled patients from 21 RCTs, colchicine was superior to placebo in the reduction of cardiovascular events. In the setting of pericardial diseases, it was associated with a lower risk of recurrent pericarditis (17 vs 34%, RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.42-0.60, I = 10%). In other studies assessing coronary artery disease patients, colchicine was associated with a reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) such as myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death, coronary revascularisation and hospitalization (6.3 vs 9%, RR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.54-0.84, I = 55). Among patients with atrial fibrillation, it was associated with lower rates of recurrence (20 vs 30%, RR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.58-0.81, I = 0). In the single RCT on heart failure, colchicine was not associated with improved NYHA class. Colchicine is a valuable anti-inflammatory agent for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with inflammatory cardiac conditions such as pericardial diseases, coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation.
Topics: Atrial Fibrillation; Colchicine; Coronary Artery Disease; Heart Failure; Humans; Pericarditis
PubMed: 35787150
DOI: 10.2217/fca-2020-0206 -
European Urology Oncology Dec 2022Multiple treatments for metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) are available, but their effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and benefit-harm... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
CONTEXT
Multiple treatments for metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) are available, but their effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and benefit-harm balance remain unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To assess clinical effectiveness regarding survival and HRQoL, safety, and benefit-harm balance of mHSPC treatments.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov until March 1, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing docetaxel, abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide, and radiotherapy combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) mutually or with ADT alone were eligible. Three reviewers independently performed screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment in duplicate.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Across ten RCTs, we found relevant survival benefits for ADT + docetaxel (high certainty according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation [GRADE]), ADT + abiraterone (moderate certainty), ADT + enzalutamide (low certainty), ADT + apalutamide (high certainty), and ADT + docetaxel + darolutamide (high certainty) compared with ADT alone. ADT + radiotherapy appeared effective only in low-volume de novo mHSPC. We found a short-term HRQoL decrease lasting 3-6 mo for ADT + docetaxel (moderate certainty) and a potential HRQoL benefit for ADT + abiraterone up to 24 mo of follow-up (moderate certainty) compared with ADT alone. There was no difference in HRQoL for ADT + enzalutamide, ADT + apalutamide, or ADT + radiotherapy over ADT alone (low-high certainty). Grade 3-5 adverse effect rates were increased with all systemic combination treatments. A benefit-harm assessment showed high probabilities (>60%) for a net clinical benefit with ADT + abiraterone, ADT + enzalutamide, and ADT + apalutamide, while ADT + docetaxel and ADT + docetaxel + darolutamide appeared unlikely (<40%) to be beneficial.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite substantial survival benefits, no systemic combination treatment showed a clear HRQoL improvement compared with ADT alone. We found evidence for a short-term HRQoL decline with ADT + docetaxel and a higher net clinical benefit with ADT + abiraterone, ADT + apalutamide and ADT + enzalutamide. While individualized decision-making remains important and economic factors need to be considered, the evidence may support a general preference for the combination of ADT with androgen receptor axis-targeted therapies over docetaxel-containing strategies.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We assessed different combination treatments for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. While survival was better with all systemic combination treatments, there was no clear improvement in health-related quality of life compared with androgen deprivation therapy alone. Novel hormonal combination treatments had a more favorable benefit-harm balance than combination treatments that include chemotherapy.
Topics: Male; Humans; Docetaxel; Network Meta-Analysis; Androgens; Prostatic Neoplasms
PubMed: 35599144
DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.04.007 -
European Journal of Dermatology : EJD Oct 2016Taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel) are among the most commonly prescribed anticancer drugs approved for the treatment of metastatic or locally advanced breast, non-small... (Review)
Review
Taxanes (docetaxel and paclitaxel) are among the most commonly prescribed anticancer drugs approved for the treatment of metastatic or locally advanced breast, non-small cell lung, prostate, gastric, head and neck, and ovarian cancers, as well as in the adjuvant setting for operable node-positive breast cancers. Although the true incidence of dermatological adverse events (AEs) in patients receiving taxanes is not known, and has never been prospectively analysed, they clearly represent one of the major AEs associated with these agents. With an increase in the occurrence of cutaneous AEs during treatment with novel targeted and immunological therapies when used in combination with taxanes, a thorough understanding of reactions attributable to this class is imperative. Moreover, identification and management of dermatological AEs is critical for maintaining the quality of life in cancer patients and for minimizing dose modifications of their antineoplastic regimen. This analysis represents a systematic review of the dermatological conditions reported with the use of these drugs, complemented by experience at comprehensive cancer centres. The conditions reported herein include skin, hair, and nail toxicities. Lastly, we describe the dermatological data available for the new, recently FDA-and EMA- approved, solvent-free nab-paclitaxel.
Topics: Alopecia; Antineoplastic Agents; Docetaxel; Drug Eruptions; Edema; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous; Nail Diseases; Paclitaxel; Pigmentation Disorders; Radiodermatitis; Taxoids
PubMed: 27550571
DOI: 10.1684/ejd.2016.2833 -
European Heart Journal Jul 2021Recent randomized trials demonstrated a benefit of low-dose colchicine added to guideline-based treatment in patients with recent myocardial infarction or chronic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
Recent randomized trials demonstrated a benefit of low-dose colchicine added to guideline-based treatment in patients with recent myocardial infarction or chronic coronary disease. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to obtain best estimates of the effects of colchicine on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).
METHODS AND RESULTS
We searched the literature for randomized clinical trials of long-term colchicine in patients with atherosclerosis published up to 1 September 2020. The primary efficacy endpoint was MACE, the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death. We combined the results of five trials that included 11 816 patients. The primary endpoint occurred in 578 patients. Colchicine reduced the risk for the primary endpoint by 25% [relative risk (RR) 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-0.92; P = 0.005], myocardial infarction by 22% (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.64-0.94; P = 0.010), stroke by 46% (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34-0.86; P = 0.009), and coronary revascularization by 23% (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90; P < 0.001). We observed no difference in all-cause death (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.71-1.62; P = 0.73), with a lower incidence of cardiovascular death (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.55-1.23; P = 0.34) counterbalanced by a higher incidence of non-cardiovascular death (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.99-1.92; P = 0.060).
CONCLUSION
Our meta-analysis indicates that low-dose colchicine reduced the risk of MACE as well as that of myocardial infarction, stroke, and the need for coronary revascularization in a broad spectrum of patients with coronary disease. There was no difference in all-cause mortality and fewer cardiovascular deaths were counterbalanced by more non-cardiovascular deaths.
Topics: Colchicine; Coronary Artery Disease; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stroke; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33769515
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab115 -
BMC Cancer Aug 2023Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are generally younger and more likely to experience disease recurrence and have the shortest survival among all breast... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of high-risk, early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are generally younger and more likely to experience disease recurrence and have the shortest survival among all breast cancer patients. Recently, neoadjuvant delivery of the programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab was approved for patients with high-risk, early-stage TNBC, but this treatment regimen has not been evaluated in head-to-head trials with other neoadjuvant treatment regimens. Therefore, the objective of this study was to estimate the relative efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab versus other neoadjuvant treatments for early-stage TNBC through a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA).
METHODS
EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, conference abstracts, and clinical trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating neoadjuvant treatments for early-stage TNBC. NMA was performed to estimate relative treatment effects among evaluated interventions.
RESULTS
Five trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in the NMA. The relative efficacy of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab was favorable to paclitaxel followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival; paclitaxel + carboplatin followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide in terms of pCR and EFS; paclitaxel + bevacizumab followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide + bevacizumab in terms of pCR; and paclitaxel + carboplatin + veliparib followed by anthracycline + cyclophosphamide in terms of EFS.
CONCLUSIONS
Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy followed by adjuvant pembrolizumab confers benefits in response and survival outcomes versus alternative neoadjuvant treatments for early-stage TNBC.
Topics: Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms; Network Meta-Analysis; Bevacizumab; Carboplatin; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Immunotherapy; Adjuvants, Immunologic; Anthracyclines; Cyclophosphamide; Paclitaxel
PubMed: 37612624
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11293-4 -
The Lancet. Oncology Oct 2019Although international guidelines support the administration of hormone therapies with or without targeted therapies in postmenopausal women with... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Endocrine treatment versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Although international guidelines support the administration of hormone therapies with or without targeted therapies in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, upfront use of chemotherapy remains common even in the absence of visceral crisis. Because first-line or second-line treatments, or both, based on chemotherapy and on hormone therapy have been scarcely investigated in head-to-head randomised controlled trials, we aimed to compare these two different approaches.
METHODS
We did a systematic review and network meta-analysis with a systematic literature search on PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, Web of Science, and online archives of the most relevant international oncology conferences. We included all phase 2 and 3 randomised controlled trials investigating chemotherapy with or without targeted therapies and hormone therapies with or without targeted therapies as first-line or second-line treatments, or both, in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, published between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2017. Additional recently published randomised controlled trials relevant to the topic were also subsequently added. No language restrictions were adopted for our search. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was done to compare hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (the primary outcome), and to compare odds ratios (ORs) for the proportion of patients achieving an overall response (the secondary outcome). All treatments were compared to anastrozole and to palbociclib plus letrozole. This study is registered in the Open Science Framework online public database, registration DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/496VR.
FINDINGS
We identified 2689 published results and 140 studies (comprising 50 029 patients) were included in the analysis. Palbociclib plus letrozole (HR 0·42; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0·25-0·70), ribociclib plus letrozole (0·43; 0·24-0·77), abemaciclib plus anastrozole or letrozole (0·42; 0·23-0·76), palbociclib plus fulvestrant (0·37; 0·23-0·59), ribociclib plus fulvestrant (0·48; 0·31-0·74), abemaciclib plus fulvestrant (0·44; 0·28-0·70), everolimus plus exemestane (0·42; 0·28-0·67), and, in patients with a PIK3CA mutation, alpelisib plus fulvestrant (0·39; 0·22-0·66), and several chemotherapy-based regimens, including anthracycline and taxane-containing regimens, were associated with better progression-free survival than was anastrozole alone. No chemotherapy or hormone therapy regimen was significantly better than palbociclib plus letrozole for progression-free survival. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab was the only clinically relevant regimen that was significantly better than palbociclib plus letrozole in terms of the proportion of patients achieving an overall response (OR 8·95; 95% CrI 1·03-76·92).
INTERPRETATION
In the first-line or second-line setting, CDK4/6 inhibitors plus hormone therapies are better than standard hormone therapies in terms of progression-free survival. Moreover, no chemotherapy regimen with or without targeted therapy is significantly better than CDK4/6 inhibitors plus hormone therapies in terms of progression-free survival. Our data support treatment guideline recommendations involving the new combinations of hormone therapies plus targeted therapies as first-line or second-line treatments, or in both settings, in women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
FUNDING
None.
Topics: Aminopyridines; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Benzimidazoles; Bevacizumab; Breast Neoplasms; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Everolimus; Female; Fulvestrant; Humans; Letrozole; Network Meta-Analysis; Paclitaxel; Piperazines; Postmenopause; Progression-Free Survival; Purines; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, ErbB-2; Receptors, Estrogen; Receptors, Progesterone
PubMed: 31494037
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30420-6 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Feb 2021Calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition disease (CPPD) is a common cause of acute and chronic arthritis, especially in the elderly population. There is a paucity of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposition disease (CPPD) is a common cause of acute and chronic arthritis, especially in the elderly population. There is a paucity of data regarding the management of CPPD disease, which is currently based on expert opinion and evidence derived from the treatment of gout. We conducted a systematic literature review in order to identify the available treatment options for CPPD, and describe their efficacy and safety.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Online databases were searched from inception to May of 2020 using the search terms: (CPPD [Title/Abstract] OR CPDD [Title/Abstract] OR calcium pyrophosphate [Title/Abstract] OR chondrocalcinosis [Title/Abstract]) AND (treatment [Title/Abstract] OR management [Title/Abstract] OR therapy [Title/Abstract]). Articles evaluating the use of specific treatment agents for CPPD were eligible for inclusion. Case reports were excluded.
RESULTS
A total of 22 eligible studies and 403 unique patients were selected. We identified only 3 randomized, double-blind, controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the use of methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and magnesium carbonate in CPPD, and these therapeutic options, with the exception of methotrexate, have shown efficacy and reduction of pain intensity. Further, 10 case series and 9 cohort studies were included. Intramuscular and intra-articular glucocorticoids, ACTH, as well as the biologic agents anakinra and tocilizumab appear to be efficacious in CPPD. Intra-articular injections of glycosaminoglycan polysulphate, hyaluronic acid and yttrium, as well as synovial membrane destruction by laser irradiation were associated with symptomatic improvement. Due to significant study heterogenicity, direct comparison between studies was not possible.
CONCLUSION
There are a limited number of studies evaluating the treatment of CPPD. High quality evidence is rather limited, while commonly administered agents such as NSAIDs, colchicine and corticosteroids have not been evaluated by RCTs. The need for high quality evidence supporting specific treatment modalities is urgent for this common yet neglected form of arthritis.
Topics: Aged; Calcium Pyrophosphate; Chondrocalcinosis; Colchicine; Gout; Humans; Methotrexate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 33360232
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.10.005 -
Clinical Toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) Jun 2010Colchicine is used mainly for the treatment and prevention of gout and for familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). It has a narrow therapeutic index, with no clear-cut... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Colchicine is used mainly for the treatment and prevention of gout and for familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). It has a narrow therapeutic index, with no clear-cut distinction between nontoxic, toxic, and lethal doses, causing substantial confusion among clinicians. Although colchicine poisoning is sometimes intentional, unintentional toxicity is common and often associated with a poor outcome.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review by searching OVID MEDLINE between 1966 and January 2010. The search strategy included "colchicine" and "poisoning" or "overdose" or "toxicity" or "intoxication."
TOXICOKINETICS
Colchicine is readily absorbed after oral administration, but undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism. It is widely distributed and binds to intracellular elements. Colchicine is primarily metabolized by the liver, undergoes significant enterohepatic re-circulation, and is also excreted by the kidneys. THERAPEUTIC AND TOXIC DOSES: The usual adult oral doses for FMF is 1.2-2.4 mg/day; in acute gout 1.2 mg/day and for gout prophylaxis 0.5-0.6 mg/day three to four times a week. High fatality rate was reported after acute ingestions exceeding 0.5 mg/kg. The lowest reported lethal doses of oral colchicine are 7-26 mg.
DRUG INTERACTIONS
CYP 3A4 and P-glycoprotein inhibitors, such as clarithromycin, erythromycin, ketoconazole, ciclosporin, and natural grapefruit juice can increase colchicine concentrations. Co-administration with statins may increase the risk of myopathy.
MECHANISMS OF TOXICITY
Colchicine's toxicity is an extension of its mechanism of action - binding to tubulin and disrupting the microtubular network. As a result, affected cells experience impaired protein assembly, decreased endocytosis and exocytosis, altered cell morphology, decreased cellular motility, arrest of mitosis, and interrupted cardiac myocyte conduction and contractility. The culmination of these mechanisms leads to multi-organ dysfunction and failure. REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY AND LACTATION: Colchicine was not shown to adversely affect reproductive potential in males or females. It crosses the placenta but there is no evidence of fetal toxicity. Colchicine is excreted into breast milk and considered compatible with lactation.
CLINICAL FEATURES
Colchicine poisoning presents in three sequential and usually overlapping phases: 1) 10-24 h after ingestion - gastrointestinal phase mimicking gastroenteritis may be absent after intravenous administration; 2) 24 h to 7 days after ingestion - multi-organ dysfunction. Death results from rapidly progressive multi-organ failure and sepsis. Delayed presentation, pre-existing renal or liver impairment are associated with poor prognosis. 3) Recovery typically occurs within a few weeks of ingestion, and is generally a complete recovery barring complications of the acute illness.
DIAGNOSIS
History of ingestion of tablets, parenteral administration, or consumption of colchicine-containing plants suggest the diagnosis. Colchicine poisoning should be suspected in patients with access to the drug and the typical toxidrome (gastroenteritis, hypotension, lactic acidosis, and prerenal azotemia).
MANAGEMENT
Timely gastrointestinal decontamination should be considered with activated charcoal, and very large, recent (<60 min) ingestions may warrant gastric lavage. Supportive treatments including administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor are the mainstay of treatment. Although a specific experimental treatment (Fab fragment antibodies) for colchicine poisoning has been used, it is not commercially available.
CONCLUSION
Although colchicine poisoning is relatively uncommon, it is imperative to recognize its features as it is associated with a high mortality rate when missed.
Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Adult; Charcoal; Clarithromycin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Colchicine; Colony-Stimulating Factors; Drug Interactions; Drug Overdose; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Familial Mediterranean Fever; Female; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Humans; Male
PubMed: 20586571
DOI: 10.3109/15563650.2010.495348