-
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Aug 2021Chagas disease (CD), caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, affects ~6-7 million people worldwide. Significant limitations still exist in our understanding of CD.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The Chagas disease study landscape: A systematic review of clinical and observational antiparasitic treatment studies to assess the potential for establishing an individual participant-level data platform.
BACKGROUND
Chagas disease (CD), caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, affects ~6-7 million people worldwide. Significant limitations still exist in our understanding of CD. Harnessing individual participant data (IPD) from studies could support more in-depth analyses to address the many outstanding research questions. This systematic review aims to describe the characteristics and treatment practices of clinical studies in CD and assess the breadth and availability of research data for the potential establishment of a data-sharing platform.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
This review includes prospective CD clinical studies published after 1997 with patients receiving a trypanocidal treatment. The following electronic databases and clinical trial registry platforms were searched: Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, LILACS, Scielo, Clintrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP. Of the 11,966 unique citations screened, 109 (0.9%) studies (31 observational and 78 interventional) representing 23,116 patients were included. Diagnosis for patient enrolment required 1 positive test result in 5 (4.6%) studies (2 used molecular method, 1 used molecular and serology, 2 used serology and parasitological methods), 2 in 60 (55.0%), 3 in 14 (12.8%) and 4 or more in 4 (3.7%) studies. A description of treatment regimen was available for 19,199 (83.1%) patients, of whom 14,605 (76.1%) received an active treatment and 4,594 (23.9%) were assigned to a placebo/no-treatment. Of the 14,605 patients who received an active treatment, benznidazole was administered in 12,467 (85.4%), nifurtimox in 825 (5.6%), itraconazole in 284 (1.9%), allopurinol in 251 (1.7%) and other drugs in 286 (1.9%). Assessment of efficacy varied largely and was based primarily on biological outcome; parasitological efficacy relied on serology in 67/85 (78.8%) studies, molecular methods in 52/85 (61.2%), parasitological in 34/85 (40.0%), microscopy in 3/85 (3.5%) and immunohistochemistry in 1/85 (1.2%). The median time at which parasitological assessment was carried out was 79 days [interquartile range (IQR): 30-180] for the first assessment, 180 days [IQR: 60-500] for second, and 270 days [IQR: 18-545] for the third assessment.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE
This review demonstrates the heterogeneity of clinical practice in CD treatment and in the conduct of clinical studies. The sheer volume of potential IPD identified demonstrates the potential for development of an IPD platform for CD and that such efforts would enable in-depth analyses to optimise the limited pharmacopoeia of CD and inform prospective data collection.
Topics: Adolescent; Antiparasitic Agents; Chagas Disease; Child; Child, Preschool; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Humans; Male; Observational Studies as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Trypanocidal Agents; Trypanosoma cruzi; Young Adult
PubMed: 34398888
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009697 -
Malaria Journal Jul 2017Ethiopia is among countries with a high malaria burden. There are several studies that assessed the efficacy of anti-malarial agents in the country and this systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Ethiopia is among countries with a high malaria burden. There are several studies that assessed the efficacy of anti-malarial agents in the country and this systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to obtain stronger evidence on treatment outcomes of malaria from the existing literature in Ethiopia.
METHODS
A systematic literature search using the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement was conducted on studies from Pubmed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases to identify published and unpublished literature. Comprehensive meta-analysis software was used to perform all meta-analyses. The Cochrane Q and the I were used to evaluate heterogeneity of studies. Random effects model was used to combine studies showing heterogeneity of Cochrane Q p < 0.10 and I > 50.
RESULTS
Twenty-one studies were included in the final analysis with a total number of 3123 study participants. Treatment outcomes were assessed clinically and parasitologically using World Health Organization guidelines. Adequate clinical and parasitological response was used to assess treatment success at the 28th day. Overall, a significant high treatment success of 92.9% (95% CI 89.1-96.6), p < 0.001, I = 98.39% was noticed. However, treatment success was higher in falciparum malaria patients treated with artemether-lumefantrine than chloroquine for Plasmodium vivax patients [98.1% (97.0-99.2), p < 0.001, I = 72.55 vs 94.7% (92.6-96.2), p < 0.001, I = 53.62%]. Seven studies reported the adverse drug reactions to anti-malarial treatment; of 822 participants, 344 of them were exposed to adverse drug reactions with a pooled event rate of 39.8% (14.1-65.5), p = 0.002.
CONCLUSIONS
On the basis of this review, anti-malarial treatment success was high (92.9%) and standard regimens showed good efficacy against Plasmodium falciparum (98.1%) and P. vivax (94.7%) infections in Ethiopia, but associated with high rates of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). However, these ADRs were not serious enough to discontinue anti-malarial treatment. The results of this study suggest that the current anti-malarial medications are effective and safe; however, greater priority should be placed on the discovery of new anti-malarial drugs to achieve successful outcomes as resistance seems inevitable since cases of anti-malarial drug resistance have been reported from other areas of the world.
Topics: Antimalarials; Artemether, Lumefantrine Drug Combination; Artemisinins; Chloroquine; Drug Combinations; Ethanolamines; Ethiopia; Fluorenes; Humans; Malaria, Falciparum; Malaria, Vivax; Primaquine; Pyrimethamine; Sulfadoxine; Treatment Failure
PubMed: 28673348
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1922-9 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Nov 2007Malaria transmission occurs most frequently in environments with humidity over 60% and ambient temperature of 25-30 degrees C. Risks increase with longer visits and... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Malaria transmission occurs most frequently in environments with humidity over 60% and ambient temperature of 25-30 degrees C. Risks increase with longer visits and depend on activity. Infection can follow a single mosquito bite. Incubation is usually 10-14 days but can be up to 18 months depending on the strain of parasite.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of non-drug preventive interventions in adult travellers? What are the effects of drug prophylaxis in adult travellers? What are the effects of antimalaria vaccines in travellers? What are the effects of antimalaria interventions in child travellers, pregnant travellers, and in airline pilots? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and other important databases up to February 2006 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 69 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: acoustic buzzers, aerosol insecticides, amodiaquine, air conditioning and electric fans, atovaquone-proguanil, biological control measures, chloroquine (alone or with proguanil), diethyltoluamide (DEET), doxycycline, full-length and light-coloured clothing, insecticide-treated clothing/nets, mefloquine, mosquito coils and vaporising mats, primaquine, pyrimethamine-dapsone, pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine, smoke, topical (skin-applied) insect repellents, and vaccines.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antimalarials; Bedding and Linens; Chloroquine; Humans; Insect Repellents; Insecticides; Malaria; Travel
PubMed: 19450348
DOI: No ID Found -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2014In 2011 the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended parenteral artesunate in preference to quinine as first-line treatment for people with severe malaria. Prior to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
In 2011 the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended parenteral artesunate in preference to quinine as first-line treatment for people with severe malaria. Prior to this recommendation, many countries, particularly in Africa, had begun to use artemether, an alternative artemisinin derivative. This review evaluates intramuscular artemether compared with both quinine and artesunate.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and safety of intramuscular artemether versus any other parenteral medication in treating severe malaria in adults and children.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and LILACS, ISI Web of Science, conference proceedings and reference lists of articles. We also searched the WHO clinical trial registry platform, ClinicalTrials.gov and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) for ongoing trials up to 9 April 2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing intramuscular artemether with intravenous or intramuscular antimalarial for treating severe malaria.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
The primary outcome was all-cause death.Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility, risk of bias and extracted data. We summarized dichotomous outcomes using risk ratios (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean differences (MD), and presented both measures with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Where appropriate, we combined data in meta-analyses and assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 18 RCTs, enrolling 2662 adults and children with severe malaria, carried out in Africa (11) and in Asia (7). Artemether versus quinine For children in Africa, there is probably little or no difference in the risk of death between intramuscular artemether and quinine (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.20; 12 trials, 1447 participants, moderate quality evidence). Coma recovery may be about five hours shorter with artemether (MD -5.45, 95% CI -7.90 to -3.00; six trials, 358 participants, low quality evidence), and artemether may result in fewer neurological sequelae, but larger trials would be needed to confirm this (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.07; seven trials, 968 participants, low quality evidence). Artemether probably shortens the parasite clearance time by about nine hours (MD -9.03, 95% CI -11.43 to -6.63; seven trials, 420 participants, moderate quality evidence), and may shorten the fever clearance time by about three hours (MD -3.73, 95% CI -6.55 to -0.92; eight trials, 457 participants, low quality evidence).For adults in Asia, treatment with intramuscular artemether probably results in fewer deaths than treatment with quinine (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.83; four trials, 716 participants, moderate quality evidence). Artemether versus artesunate Artemether and artesunate have not been directly compared in randomized trials in African children.For adults in Asia, mortality is probably higher with intramuscular artemether (RR 1.80, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.97, two trials,494 participants, moderate quality evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Although there is a lack of direct evidence comparing artemether with artesunate, artemether is probably less effective than artesunate at preventing deaths from severe malaria. In circumstances where artesunate is not available, artemether is an alternative to quinine.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Africa; Antimalarials; Artemether; Artemisinins; Artesunate; Asia; Child; Child, Preschool; Humans; Infant; Injections, Intramuscular; Malaria, Cerebral; Malaria, Falciparum; Oceania; Quinine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 25209020
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010678.pub2 -
Parasitology Nov 2022From a systematic review framework, we analysed the clinical evidence on the effectiveness and safety of monotherapy and combination chemotherapy for Chagas disease... (Review)
Review
From a systematic review framework, we analysed the clinical evidence on the effectiveness and safety of monotherapy and combination chemotherapy for Chagas disease (ChD) treatment. The research protocol was based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and patient, intervention, comparison and outcome strategy. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) were retrieved from Embase, Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Diagnostic tools, treatment protocols, seroconversion rates and adverse events were investigated. Fifteen RCT mainly concentrated in endemic countries were identified. ChD diagnosis was mainly based on haemagglutination, immunofluorescence, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and polymerase chain reaction. Benznidazole (BNZ), nifurtimox, fosravuconazole, posaconazole, allopurinol and thioctic acid were the identified drugs. The best negative seroconversion results (100, 96, 94 and 91.3%) were, respectively, based on BNZ (5 mg kg day, 200 mg day, 150 mg day and 2.5 mg kg) administration for 60 days. Negative seroconversion was not achieved with allopurinol (300 mg day for 60 days). Adverse reactions ranged from 5 to 73% in patients receiving antiparasitic chemotherapy. Treatment discontinuation (1.5–57%) was mainly associated with gastrointestinal, cutaneous and neurological manifestations. Current RCT-based evidence indicates that BNZ is the most viable option for ChD treatment. However, new protocols need to be developed to mitigate side effects and increase patient adherence to antiparasitic chemotherapy. Therefore, shorter regimens, lower concentrations and treatments combining BNZ with posaconazole, fosravuconazole or ravuconazole may be viable to ensure comparable efficacy to BZN-based monotherapy, contributing to reduce dose- and time-dependent toxicity reactions.
Topics: Humans; Trypanosoma cruzi; Trypanocidal Agents; Allopurinol; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Chagas Disease; Nitroimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35957576
DOI: 10.1017/S0031182022001081 -
The Journal of Antimicrobial... Nov 2007A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of atovaquone-proguanil (Malarone) as a chemoprophylactic agent against malaria. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of atovaquone-proguanil (Malarone) as a chemoprophylactic agent against malaria.
METHODS
The data sources searched for this study included Cochrane systematic reviews (on infectious diseases), MEDLINE and EMBASE, Web of Knowledge and Annals of Tropical Medicine. All unconfounded randomized controlled trials assessing the chemoprophylaxis against malaria with atovaquone-proguanil were included in the review. Data on study design, study sample, inclusion and exclusion criteria, allocation, blinding, primary and secondary study end points were all extracted by one reviewer and independently rechecked by the second reviewer.
RESULTS
In general, all 10 studies identified had excellent quality with total scores of >or=4 using the Jadad criteria. Ten controlled trials comprising 4,539 participants were included for this review. A meta-analysis of six of the ten studies found chemoprophylaxis with atovaquone-proguanil, with a prophylaxis efficacy of 95.8% (95% CI = 91.5-97.9), to be superior to placebo. It was also considered safe and better tolerated with fewer treatment-related adverse events that could lead to premature discontinuation of prophylaxis than in controls. Comparison with alternative chemoprophylaxis also showed atovaquone-proguanil to be better tolerated with fewer treatment-related self-reported adverse events (RR = 0.8234; 95% CI = 0.673164-1.01) or severe adverse events (RR = 0.6140; 95% CI = 0.420055-0.8975). Atovaquone-proguanil is well tolerated with no difference in non-compliance with placebo (RR = 0.8804; 95% CI = 0.6964-1.113; I(2) = 31.4%).
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence from this review shows that atovaquone-proguanil is highly efficacious as a prophylactic agent against malaria infection and is very well tolerated compared with other antimalarial agents.
Topics: Antimalarials; Atovaquone; Drug Combinations; Humans; Malaria; Proguanil
PubMed: 17848375
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkm337 -
ACS Infectious Diseases Mar 2023Leishmaniasis is an infectious disease responsible for a huge rate of morbidity and mortality in humans. Chemotherapy consists of the use of pentavalent antimonial,... (Review)
Review
Leishmaniasis is an infectious disease responsible for a huge rate of morbidity and mortality in humans. Chemotherapy consists of the use of pentavalent antimonial, amphotericin B, pentamidine, miltefosine, and paromomycin. However, these drugs are associated with some drawbacks such as high toxicity, administration by parenteral route, and most seriously the resistance of some strains of the parasite to them. Several strategies have been used to increase the therapeutic index and reduce the toxic effects of these drugs. Among them, the use of nanosystems that have great potential as a site-specific drug delivery system stands out. This review aims to compile results from studies that were carried out using first- and second-line antileishmanial drug-carrying nanosystems. The articles referred to here were published between 2011 and 2021. This study shows the promise of effective applicability of drug-carrying nanosystems in the field of antileishmanial therapeutics, with the perspective of providing better patient adherence to treatment, increased therapeutic efficacy, reduced toxicity of conventional drugs, as well as the potential to efficiently improve the treatment of leishmaniasis.
Topics: Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Antiprotozoal Agents; Leishmaniasis; Pentamidine; Paromomycin
PubMed: 36795604
DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.2c00632 -
Acta Tropica Dec 2022Protozoa is a group of microorganisms that cause neglected tropical diseases, such as malaria, Chagas disease, and Leishmaniasis. Due to the growing demand for new... (Review)
Review
Protozoa is a group of microorganisms that cause neglected tropical diseases, such as malaria, Chagas disease, and Leishmaniasis. Due to the growing demand for new therapeutic agents, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have gained attention for antiprotozoal action. A systematic literature review described the current scenario of plant and animal AMPs with action antiprotozoal. The terms "antimicrobial peptides", "plant", and "animal" combined with the names of the etiological agents were used in the search. Boolean and Operator were used to connect the terms. The search found 4,825 articles. However, 79 articles were excluded because they were duplicates, and 4,627 were excluded based on title and abstract. Therefore, 119 were evaluated and included here. Of these, the use of antimicrobial peptides of animal origin was predominant. Still, the works with plant peptides focused on the genus Leishmania. Only antimicrobial peptides of animal origin were described for the other genera of protozoa (Toxoplasma spp, Trypanosoma spp, Plasmodium spp). Antimicrobial peptides are an excellent option as a pharmacological tool to fight these infections due to their aggregation and extravasation of cellular content through the formation of pores in the cell membrane of these microorganisms.
Topics: Antimicrobial Peptides; Antiprotozoal Agents; Humans; Leishmania; Leishmaniasis; Neglected Diseases; Peptides
PubMed: 36057367
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2022.106675 -
Malaria Journal Mar 2017Despite increased efforts to control and ultimately eradicate human malaria, Plasmodium ovale malaria is for the most part outside the focus of research or public health... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Despite increased efforts to control and ultimately eradicate human malaria, Plasmodium ovale malaria is for the most part outside the focus of research or public health programmes. Importantly, the understanding of P. ovale-nowadays regarded as the two distinct species P. ovale wallikeri and P. ovale curtisi-largely stems from case reports and case series lacking study designs providing high quality evidence. Consecutively, there is a lack of systematic evaluation of the clinical presentation, appropriate treatment and relapse characteristics of P. ovale malaria. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a systematic appraisal of the current evidence for severe manifestations, relapse characteristics and treatment options for human P. ovale malaria.
METHODS AND RESULTS
This systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines and registered in the international prospective register for systematic reviews (PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016039214). P. ovale mono-infection was a strict inclusion criterion. Of 3454 articles identified by the literature search, 33 articles published between 1922 and 2015 met the inclusion criteria. These articles did not include randomized controlled trials. Five prospective uncontrolled clinical trials were performed on a total of 58 participants. P. ovale was sensitive to all tested drugs within the follow-up periods and on interpretable in vitro assays. Since its first description in 1922, only 18 relapsing cases of P. ovale with a total of 28 relapse events were identified in the scientific literature. There was however no molecular evidence for a causal relationship between dormant liver stages and subsequent relapses. A total of 22 severe cases of P. ovale malaria were published out of which five were fatal. Additionally, two cases of congenital P. ovale malaria were reported.
CONCLUSIONS
Current knowledge of P. ovale malaria is based on small trials with minor impact, case reports and clinical observations. This systematic review highlights that P. ovale is capable of causing severe disease, severe congenital malaria and may even lead to death. Evidence for relapses in patients with P. ovale malaria adds up to only a handful of cases. Nearly 100 years after P. ovale's first description by Stephens the evidence for the clinical characteristics, relapse potential and optimal treatments for P. ovale malaria is still scarce.
Topics: Antimalarials; Humans; Malaria; Plasmodium ovale; Recurrence
PubMed: 28284211
DOI: 10.1186/s12936-017-1759-2 -
PloS One 2012Chemotherapy based on repeated doses of praziquantel is still the most effective control strategy against Schistosomiasis, however artemisinin derivatives emerged as a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Chemotherapy based on repeated doses of praziquantel is still the most effective control strategy against Schistosomiasis, however artemisinin derivatives emerged as a family of compounds with schistomicide activity. The aim of the present work is to compare the efficacy of artemisinin-based therapies in the treatment and prophylaxis of human schistosomiasis. The design of this work involved a quantitative systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
Retrieval of published studies was carried out through an electronic search of the PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, Cochrane Library and CINAHL databases. This included reports comparing the therapeutic efficacy of artesunate alone, artesunate plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and a combination of artemisinin derivatives plus praziquantel against praziquantel alone on different types of schistosomiasis. Moreover, studies on artesunate and artemether used as preventive drugs were also analyzed against placebo. The primary outcome measure for schistosomiasis treatment was "parasitological cure", whereas for the prophylaxis the outcome evaluated was "infection rate". Our results show that patients treated with artesunate alone have significantly lower cure rates than those treated with praziquantel (OR = 0.27 (95% C.I. 0.13-0.53; p<0.001)) and that the combined therapy of artesunate plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine is also significantly less effective than praziquantel treatment (OR = 0.14 (95% C.I. 0.02-0.92; p = 0.04)). However, the combination of an artemisinin derivatives plus praziquantel showed a higher cure rate than praziquantel monotherapy with OR = 2.07 (95% C.I. 1.27-3.36; p = 0.003). Finally, chemoprophylaxis with either artesunate (RR = 0.11 (95% C.I. 0.06-0.22; p<0.001)) or artemether (RR = 0.25 (95% C.I. 0.16-0.40; p<0.001)) was significantly better than a placebo in both cases.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE
This meta-analysis confirms that artemisinin derivatives used in combination with praziquantel have the potential to increase the cure rates in schistosomiasis treatment, but not artesunate alone. It is also confirmed that repeated doses of artemisinin derivatives play a prophylactic role, significantly reducing the incidence of Schistosoma japonicum infections compared with placebo.
Topics: Antiprotozoal Agents; Artemisinins; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Praziquantel; Pyrimethamine; Schistosomiasis; Sulfadoxine; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 23029285
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045867