-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2006Because of the disability associated with surgery for anal fissure and the risk of incontinence, medical alternatives for surgery have been sought. Most recently,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Because of the disability associated with surgery for anal fissure and the risk of incontinence, medical alternatives for surgery have been sought. Most recently, pharmacologic methods that relax the anal smooth muscle, to accomplish reversibly what occurs in surgery, have been used to obtain fissure healing.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and morbidity of various medical therapies for anal fissure.
SEARCH STRATEGY
Search terms include "anal fissure randomized". Timing from 1966 to May 2006. Further details of the search below.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Studies in which participants were randomized to a non-surgical therapy for anal fissure. Comparison groups may include an operative procedure, an alternate medical therapy or placebo. Chronic fissure, acute fissure and fissure in children are included in the review. Atypical fissures associated with inflammatory bowel disease or cancer or anal infection are excluded.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data were abstracted from published reports and meeting abstracts, assessing method of randomization, blinding, "intention to treat" and drop-outs, therapies, supportive measures (applied to both groups), dosing and frequency and cross-overs. Dichotomous outcome measures included Non-healing of the fissure (a combination of persistence and recurrence), and Adverse events (including incontinence, headache, infection, anaphylaxis). Continuous outcome measures included measures of pain relief and anorectal manometry.
MAIN RESULTS
48 different comparisons of the ability of medical therapies to heal anal fissure have been reported in 53 RCTs. Eleven agents were used (nitroglycerin ointment (GTN), isosorbide dinitrate, Botulinum toxin (Botox), diltiazem, nifedipine (Calcium channel blockers or CCBs), hydrocortisone, lignocaine, bran, minoxidil, indoramin, and placebo) as well as anal dilators and surgical sphincterotomy.GTN was found to be marginally but significantly better than placebo in healing anal fissure (48.6% vs. 37%, p < 0.004), but late recurrence of fissure was common, in the range of 50% of those initially cured. Botox and CCBs were equivalent to GTN in efficacy with fewer adverse events. No medical therapy came close to the efficacy of surgical sphincterotomy, though none in these RCTs was associated with the risk of incontinence.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Medical therapy for chronic anal fissure, acute fissure and fissure in children may be applied with a chance of cure that is marginally better than placebo, and, for chronic fissure in adults, far less effective than surgery.
Topics: Fissure in Ano; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 17054170
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003431.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2003Because of the disability associated with surgery for anal fissure and the risk of incontinence, medical alternatives for surgery have been sought. Most recently,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Because of the disability associated with surgery for anal fissure and the risk of incontinence, medical alternatives for surgery have been sought. Most recently, pharmacologic methods that relax the anal smooth muscle, to accomplish reversibly what occurs in surgery, have been used to obtain fissure healing.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and morbidity of various medical therapies for anal fissure.
SEARCH STRATEGY
Search terms include "anal fissure randomized".
SELECTION CRITERIA
Studies in which participants were randomized to a non-surgical therapy for anal fissure. Comparison groups may include an operative procedure, an alternate medical therapy or placebo. Chronic fissure, acute fissure and fissure in children are included in the review. Atypical fissures associated with inflammatory bowel disease or cancer or anal infection are excluded.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Data were abstracted from published reports and meeting abstracts, assessing method of randomization, blinding, "intention to treat" and drop-outs, therapies, supportive measures (applied to both groups), dosing and frequency and cross-overs. Dichotomous outcome measures included Non-healing of the fissure (a combination of persistence and recurrence), and Adverse events (including incontinence, headache, infection, anaphylaxis). Continuous outcome measures included measures of pain relief and anorectal manometry.
MAIN RESULTS
21 different comparisons of the ability of medical therapies to heal anal fissure have been reported in 31 RCTs. Nine agents were used (nitroglycerin ointment (GTN), isosorbide dinitrate, Botulinum toxin (Botox), diltiazem, nifedipine (Calcium channel blockers or Cachablos), hydrocortisone, lignocaine, bran, placebo) as well as anal dilators and surgical sphincterotomy. When two studies are excluded from analysis due to quality concerns, the significance disappears in the three main analyses: GTN vs. placebo group (0.78; 0.56-1.08), in children (0.96; 0.48-1.92) and adults (0.73; 0.50-1.07). That is, GTN was, in this modified analysis, not significantly better than placebo in curing anal fissure. Cachablos were not tested against placebo, but in a comparison to GTN, Cachablo was equivalent in its ability to cure fissure (odds ratio 0.66; 0.22-2.01). Botox, in a meta-analysis of two studies compared to placebo, showed no significant advantage in efficacy (0.75; 0.32-1.77), and in a comparison to GTN analyzing two studies, was also not significantly better than GTN (0.48; 0.21-1.10).
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
Medical therapy for chronic anal fissure, acute fissure and fissure in children may be applied with a chance of cure that is only marginally better than placebo, and, for chronic fissure in adults, far less effective than surgery.
Topics: Fissure in Ano; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 14583976
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003431 -
Cancer Cytopathology Jul 2018Anal cancer incidence and mortality have been increasing over the past decade. Although the incidence in the general population remains low, it is much higher in certain... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Anal cancer incidence and mortality have been increasing over the past decade. Although the incidence in the general population remains low, it is much higher in certain subgroups, including those living with human immunodeficiency virus and men who have sex with men. Approximately 90% of anal squamous cell cancers are caused by infection with carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV). Given the common etiology between anal and cervical carcinogenesis, screening for anal cancer has been proposed in certain high-risk populations using strategies adapted from cervical cancer prevention. In this review, the authors discuss important differences in anal and cervical cancer regarding the populations at risk, disease natural history, and clinical procedures and outcomes that need to be considered when evaluating strategies for anal cancer screening. They also performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of anal cytology, anal HPV testing, and various biomarkers for the detection of anal precancers and cancers. The implications of these performance estimates are summarized in the context of risk-based screening and management of anal precancers, and important research gaps are highlighted that need to be addressed to fully understand the benefits and harms of anal cancer screening. Cancer Cytopathol 2018. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Topics: Anus Neoplasms; Biomarkers; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cytodiagnosis; Early Detection of Cancer; Humans; Incidence; Papillomaviridae; Papillomavirus Infections; Prognosis
PubMed: 29797691
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22018 -
British Journal of Cancer Dec 2010recent decades have seen combination chemoradiotherapy become the standard treatment for anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, the burden of this disease... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
recent decades have seen combination chemoradiotherapy become the standard treatment for anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, the burden of this disease continues to rise, with only 10% of patients with metastatic disease surviving >2 years. Further insight into tumour characteristics and molecular biology may identify novel therapeutic targets. This systematic review examines current prognostic markers in SCC of the anus.
METHODS
an extensive literature search was performed to identify studies reporting on biomarkers in anal cancer in the context of clinical outcome following treatment primarily with chemoradiotherapy.
RESULTS
in all, 21 studies were included. A total of 29 biomarkers were studied belonging to 9 different functional classes. Of these biomarkers, 13 were found to have an association with outcome in at least one study. The tumour-suppressor genes p53 and p21 were the only markers shown to be of prognostic value in more than one study.
CONCLUSIONS
an array of biomarkers have been identified that correlate with survival following chemoradiotherapy in anal cancer. However, investigators are yet to identify a biomarker that has the ability to consistently predict outcome in this disease. Further studies are needed to elucidate whether these candidate biomarkers demonstrate their optimum value when they serve as targets for new therapeutic strategies.
Topics: Anus Neoplasms; Apoptosis; Biomarkers, Tumor; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p21; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p27; Genes, Tumor Suppressor; Genes, p53; Humans; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Prognosis
PubMed: 21063399
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605984 -
Updates in Surgery Sep 2017There is an ever-growing need, with the ongoing developments in research and the progress towards patient centered care, to delineate standardized protocols of... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
There is an ever-growing need, with the ongoing developments in research and the progress towards patient centered care, to delineate standardized protocols of management of anal cancer. However, guidelines from different societies show some degree of disagreement. This is a systematic review of the literature to identify similarities and discrepancies between the guidelines for the management of anal cancer drafted by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). We found essentially similar management for investigation, diagnosis, chemotherapy regimens, and radiotherapy doses in both ESMO and NCCN recommendations in the management of anal cancer. There were few differences, which included the levels of evidence and grades of recommendations, the delineation of radiotherapy fields, and the treatment of the elderly and personalized medicine based on genetics. The follow-up regime is also marginally different in the first 2 years. Even if the observed differences may be justified by a different implementation of evidence-based medicine among different countries for particular management modalities of anal cancer, we identified the grey areas which need further study. In addition, these facets should be assessed more carefully when planning future guidelines.
Topics: Anus Neoplasms; Europe; Humans; Medical Oncology; Neoplasm Staging; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Qualitative Research; Societies, Medical
PubMed: 28597183
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-017-0470-8 -
International Journal of Surgery... 2013Anal squamous cell carcinoma with lymph node metastases carries a poor outcome. There remains a need for a better method to diagnose inguinal lymph node metastases which... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Anal squamous cell carcinoma with lymph node metastases carries a poor outcome. There remains a need for a better method to diagnose inguinal lymph node metastases which is minimally invasive, accurate and avoids unnecessary irradiation to the groin with its associated significant co-morbidity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in anal squamous cell carcinoma.
METHODS
The systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. The Medline, Central and Embase databases were searched using the terms 'sentinel lymph node' and 'anus neoplasms'.
RESULTS
The systematic review identified 17 studies, containing 270 patients. SLN detection rate varied from 47% to 100%. The presence of nodal metastases varied from 0 to 44%. The complication rate varied from 0 to 59%. The rate of development of subsequent inguinal lymph node metastases in those previously SLN biopsy-negative (a surrogate marker for false negative rate) ranged from 0 to 18.75%.
CONCLUSION
SLN biopsy is a feasible method of assessing lymph node status in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma. Longer follow up is required to evaluate the proportion of patients who are SLN biopsy-negative and subsequently develop nodal metastases. More studies are required to ascertain whether SLN biopsy should be the main method of assessing inguinal lymph node involvement in patients with anal squamous cell carcinoma.
Topics: Anus Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Humans; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
PubMed: 23872032
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.07.005 -
International Journal of Colorectal... Sep 2023To evaluate the effect of different surgical methods in the treatment of high complex anal fistula by systematic review and network meta-analysis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To evaluate the effect of different surgical methods in the treatment of high complex anal fistula by systematic review and network meta-analysis.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, VIP were searched from the date of database construction to May 23, 2023.
RESULTS
Among the 48 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 4205 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. Incision thread-drawing counter-drainage procedure (ITCP) in improving the effective rate, the cure rate; reduce the recurrence rate, reduce the anal canal damage has a huge advantage. Directional line-hanging method (DLM) is optimal for safety and postoperative pain relief. Directional line-hanging method (ITSS) protect the optimal anal function after surgery. Sphincter preserving thread-hanging method (SPTM) has a significant advantage in accelerating wound healing time. Main tube incision combined with thread-hanging branch tube drainage (MIBD) is second only to incision thread-drawing counter-drainage procedure (ITCP) in improving effective rate, cure rate, reducing recurrence rate and reduce complication rate.
CONCLUSION
In general, different thread-drawing surgery methods have good clinical effect for the treatment of high complex anal fistula. In general, these methods provide evidence-based medical evidence for early treatment in terms of improving clinical efficacy, relieving anal pain and reducing wound healing time. However, there are differences in the number of included literature studies, and further verification by large-sample, high-quality, multicenter RCTS is still needed in the next stage.
Topics: Humans; Network Meta-Analysis; Drainage; Anal Canal; Anus Diseases; Rectal Fistula; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Multicenter Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37707561
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04519-1 -
Digestive Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) 2023Topical treatments and botulinum toxin injections are valid options for the management of patients with chronic anal fissures (CAF), but little is known about the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Topical treatments and botulinum toxin injections are valid options for the management of patients with chronic anal fissures (CAF), but little is known about the efficacy of these techniques in long-term follow-up. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness, given to clinical outcomes, of medical treatments with calcium antagonists, nitroglycerin, and botulinum toxin on CAF treatment in adults.
METHOD
A systemic review and meta-analysis developed according to PRISMA [PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000100; BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332] and registered in PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42020120386). A systematic literature search was conducted through MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized control trials that compared medical treatment were identified; publications had to have a clinical definition of CAF with at least one of the following signs or symptoms: visible sphincter fibers at the base of the fissure, anal papillae, sentinel piles, and indurated margins. The symptoms had to be chronic for at least 4 weeks. Data were independently extracted for each study, and a meta-analysis was drawn using fixed- and random-effects models.
RESULTS
17 randomized trials met the inclusion criteria. Diltiazem showed a superior effect compared with glycerin (RR = 1.16 [95% CI = 1.05-1.30]; I2 = 18%) and with fewer adverse effects (RR = 0.13 [95% CI = 0.04-0.042]; I2 = 87%). Similar results were evidenced with the use of nifedipine compared with lidocaine (RR = 4.53 [95% CI = 2.99-6.86]; I2 = 28%). Botulinum toxin did not show statistically significant differences compared to glycerin (RR = 0.81 [95% CI = 0.02-29.36]; I2 = 93%) or isosorbide dinitrate (RR = 1.45 [95% CI = 0.32-6.54]; I2 = 85%). Regarding recurrence, nifedipine was superior to lidocaine (RR = 0.18 [95% CI = 0.08-0.44]; I2 = 31%).
CONCLUSIONS
Calcium channel blockers performed well regarding the healing of CAF when compared to others in long-term follow-up. The superiority of botulinum toxin was not evidenced compared to topical treatments. More studies are needed to better assess recurrence rates.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Fissure in Ano; Nifedipine; Glycerol; Treatment Outcome; Nitroglycerin; Chronic Disease
PubMed: 36646066
DOI: 10.1159/000528222 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Dec 2013The prognosis of anal adenocarcinoma is poor and the management remains controversial. We carried out a literature review to identify current practice in the management... (Review)
Review
AIM
The prognosis of anal adenocarcinoma is poor and the management remains controversial. We carried out a literature review to identify current practice in the management of anal adenocarcinoma.
METHOD
A systematic review of the literature was performed for studies in the English language published between 1950 and 2011. All those that focused on the management of anal adenocarcinoma were considered for inclusion.
RESULTS
Sixteen retrospective observational studies were identified; no randomized trials were found. Most of the studies contained small numbers of patients due to the rarity of anal adenocarcinoma. Treatment included local excision), radiotherapy, chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy and abdominoperineal excision. Most studies concluded that a multimodality approach, combining radical surgical resection with neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was the optimal management strategy.
CONCLUSION
The prognosis of anal adenocarcinoma is poor, and there is little information on the optimal management. The relevant studies indicate that a combination of radical surgical resection and pre- or postoperative chemoradiotherapy offers the best chance of survival.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Anal Canal; Anus Neoplasms; Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Humans; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prognosis; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 23809885
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12325 -
BJS Open Nov 2021Anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm with a poor prognosis. The surgical approaches for anorectal melanoma can be categorized into local excision (procedures without... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm with a poor prognosis. The surgical approaches for anorectal melanoma can be categorized into local excision (procedures without lymph node removal and preservation of the rectum) and extensive resection (procedures with rectum and pararectal lymph node removal). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the survival of patients who underwent extensive resection with that of patients who underwent local excision, stratifying patients according to tumour stage.
METHODS
A literature review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines by searching MEDLINE/PubMed for manuscripts published until March 2021. Studies comparing survival outcomes in patients with anorectal melanoma who underwent local excision versus extensive resection were screened for eligibility. Meta-analysis was performed for overall survival after the different surgical approaches, stratified by tumour stage.
RESULTS
There were 347 studiesidentified of which 34 were included for meta-analysis with a total of 1858 patients. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the surgical approaches in patients per stage (stage I odds ratio 1.30 (95 per cent c.i. 0.62 to 2.72, P = 0.49); stage II odds ratio 1.61 (95 per cent c.i. 0.62 to 4.18, P = 0.33); stage I-III odds ratio 1.19 (95 per cent c.i. 0.83 to 1.70, P = 0.35). Subgroup analyses were conducted for the time intervals (<2000, 2001-2010 and 2011-2021) and for continent of study origin. Subgroup analysis for time interval and continent of origin also showed no statistically significant differences in overall survival.
CONCLUSION
No significant survival benefit exists for patients with anorectal melanoma treated with local excision or extensive resection, independent of tumour stage.
Topics: Anus Neoplasms; Humans; Melanoma; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Rectal Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 34958352
DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab107