-
Sleep Medicine Reviews Apr 2024Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most prevalent microvascular diabetic complications. Poor sleep health and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are risk factors for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the most prevalent microvascular diabetic complications. Poor sleep health and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are risk factors for diabetes and poor glycemic control. Recent studies have suggested associations between poor sleep health/OSA and DR. Furthermore, there have been suggestions of melatonin dysregulation in the context of DR. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring the associations between multidimensional sleep health (duration, satisfaction, efficiency, timing/regularity and alertness), OSA and melatonin with DR. Forty-two studies were included. Long, but not short sleep, was significantly associated with DR, OR 1.41 (95%CI 1.21, 1.64). Poor sleep satisfaction was also significantly associated with DR, OR 2.04 (1.41, 2.94). Sleep efficiency and alertness were not associated with DR, while the evidence on timing/regularity was scant. Having OSA was significantly associated with having DR, OR 1.34 (1.07, 1.69). Further, those with DR had significantly lower melatonin/melatonin metabolite levels than those without DR, standardized mean difference -0.94 (-1.44, -0.44). We explored whether treating OSA with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) led to improvement in DR (five studies). The results were mixed among studies, but potential benefits were observed in some. This review highlights the association between poor multidimensional sleep health and DR.
Topics: Humans; Diabetic Retinopathy; Melatonin; Sleep; Risk Factors; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 38118339
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2023.101891 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Aug 2023To evaluate the associations between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the associations between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy on SNHL.
DATA SOURCES
Ovid Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases.
REVIEW METHODS
A systematic search was done for studies investigating relationships between OSA and SNHL in adults, with manual searches for additional references. The final update was done on December 22, 2021. The Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies was applied for quality assessments.
RESULTS
The 20 included studies had a total of 34,442 participants (66% male; mean age, 46.6 years). The OSA group had a significantly worse mean hearing threshold level (HTL) than the control group for midfrequency ranges (500, 1000, 2000 Hz; mean difference, 4.00 dB; 95% CI, 2.40-5.61) and high-frequency ranges (4000, 8000 Hz; mean difference, 6.24 dB; 95% CI, 2.99-9.49). An association between OSA and SNHL was found. When compared with controls, patients with OSA had an odds ratio of 1.52 (95% CI, 1.12-2.06) for midfrequency hearing impairment and 1.19 (95% CI, 1.05-1.34) for high-frequency hearing impairment. However, we did not find significant improvements in midfrequency HTL after CPAP therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
HTL was significantly poorer among participants with OSA (especially in severe cases) than non-OSA controls. Studies on patients with OSA with SNHL treated with CPAP did not show significant improvements in midfrequency HTL. Further studies are warranted on these issues.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Female; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Bias; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural; Hearing Loss
PubMed: 36040818
DOI: 10.1177/01945998221120777 -
Journal of Interventional Cardiac... Jun 2021Phrenic and hypoglossal nerve pacing therapies have shown benefit in sleep apnea. We sought to analyze the role of pacing therapies in sleep apnea and their impact on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Phrenic and hypoglossal nerve pacing therapies have shown benefit in sleep apnea. We sought to analyze the role of pacing therapies in sleep apnea and their impact on heart failure.
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar from inception to August 5, 2019, was performed. A meta-analysis was performed using fixed effects model to calculate mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
Six studies were eligible and included 626 patients, of whom 334 were in the control arm and 393 were in the experimental arm. Phrenic nerve pacing (MD - 23.20 events/h, 95% CI - 27.96 to - 18.44, p < 0.00001) and hypoglossal nerve pacing (MD - 20.24 events/h, 95% CI - 23.22 to - 17.27, p < 0.00001) were associated with improvements in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Phrenic nerve pacing was associated with a trend towards improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 3.95%, 95% CI - 0.04 to 7.94, p = 0.05). Hypoglossal and phrenic nerve pacing were associated with improvements in the quality of life as assessed by improvements in Epworth sleepiness scale (MD 3.71 points, 95% CI 2.89 to 4.54, p < 0.00001).
CONCLUSIONS
Our analysis suggests that phrenic and hypoglossal nerve pacing improves AHI and quality of life with a trend towards improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction, especially in central sleep apnea. Complications were high but future refinement in technology will likely improve clinical outcomes and minimize complications.
Topics: Humans; Quality of Life; Sleep Apnea Syndromes; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left
PubMed: 32445012
DOI: 10.1007/s10840-020-00760-8 -
Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) 2024Summarize the evidence on drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
Summarize the evidence on drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea.
METHODS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, SciELO, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched on February 17th, 2023. A search strategy retrieved randomized clinical trials comparing the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) in pharmacotherapies. Studies were selected and data was extracted by two authors independently. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. RevMan 5.4. was used for data synthesis.
RESULTS
4930 articles were obtained, 68 met inclusion criteria, and 29 studies (involving 11 drugs) were combined in a meta-analysis. Atomoxetine plus oxybutynin vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -7.71 (-10.59, -4.83) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 50 %, overall effect: Z = 5.25, p < 0.001]. Donepezil vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -8.56 (-15.78, -1.33) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 21 %, overall effect: Z = 2.32, p = 0.02]. Sodium oxybate vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -5.50 (-9.28, -1.73) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 32 %, overall effect: Z = 2.86, p = 0.004]. Trazodone vs placebo in AHI mean difference of -12.75 (-21.30, -4.19) [Fixed, 95 % CI, I2 = 0 %, overall effect: Z = 2.92, p = 0.003].
CONCLUSION
The combination of noradrenergic and antimuscarinic drugs shows promising results. Identifying endotypes may be the key to future drug therapies for obstructive sleep apnea. Moreover, studies with longer follow-up assessing the safety and sustained effects of these treatments are needed.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022362639.
Topics: Humans; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Atomoxetine Hydrochloride; Donepezil; Norepinephrine
PubMed: 38341903
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100330 -
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine :... Jan 2022Eye diseases are an important group of increasingly prevalent disorders that contribute very significantly to disability and represent a considerable health burden. Some... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
UNLABELLED
Eye diseases are an important group of increasingly prevalent disorders that contribute very significantly to disability and represent a considerable health burden. Some data suggest that several of these diseases may be associated with sleep-disordered breathing, mainly obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), due to intermediate mechanisms, such as intermittent hypoxia or sleep fragmentation. The aims of this systematic review were to identify and critically evaluate the current evidence supporting the existence of a possible relationship between OSA and the more relevant eye diseases as well as to evaluate the potential pathogenic mechanisms. There is a body of largely low-level evidence for the association of OSA with glaucoma, nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy, central serous chorioretinopathy, and diabetic retinopathy. Meta-analysis of available case-control studies shows that OSA increases the risk of glaucoma (pooled odds ratio: 1.50; 95% confidence interval: 1.25 to 1.80; < .001), nonarteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (3.62; 1.94 to 6.76; < .001), and diabetic retinopathy (1.57; 1.09 to 2.27; = .02). Moreover, several pathogenic pathways have been identified, mainly related to hypoxic damage, mechanical stress, systemic inflammation, oxidative stress, sympathetic tone, and endothelial dysfunction. In contrast, information about the effect of apnea-hypopnea suppression on the development and progression of eye damage is either nonexistent or of a very low level of evidence. In conclusion, OSA has emerged as an additional potential risk factor for many eye diseases, although their link is weak and contradictory, so further examination is required.
CITATION
García-Sánchez A, Villalaín I, Asencio M, García J, García-Rio F. Sleep apnea and eye diseases: evidence of association and potential pathogenic mechanisms. . 2022;18(1):265-278.
Topics: Glaucoma; Humans; Hypoxia; Optic Neuropathy, Ischemic; Sleep Apnea Syndromes; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 34283018
DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.9552 -
Sleep & Breathing = Schlaf & Atmung Sep 2020The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize and qualitatively analyze published evidence elucidating the prevalence of dysphagia and detail alterations in...
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of this systematic review was to summarize and qualitatively analyze published evidence elucidating the prevalence of dysphagia and detail alterations in swallowing function in patients with OSAS.
METHODS
Computerized literature searches were performed from four search engines. The studies were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The studies were screened using Covidence (Cochrane tool) and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards (PRISMA-2009). A total 2645 studies were initially retrieved, of which a total of 17 studies met inclusion criteria. Two reviewers, blinded to each other, evaluated level and strength of evidence using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence and QualSyst, respectively.
RESULTS
Dysphagia prevalence ranged from 16 to 78% among the eligible studies. Studies varied in operational definitions defining swallowing dysfunction (dysphagia) and method used to assess swallowing function. Approximately 70% of eligible studies demonstrated strong methodological quality. The majority of studies (n = 11; 65%) reported pharyngeal swallowing impairments in patients with OSAS, including delayed initiation of pharyngeal swallow and penetration/aspiration.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review describes swallowing function in patients with OSAS. However, due to the variability in defining OSAS and dysphagia, in the assessment method used to determine dysphagia, and heterogeneity of study designs, true prevalence is difficult to determine. Clinicians involved in the management of OSAS patients should employ validated assessment measures to determine if swallow dysfunction is present.
Topics: Deglutition; Deglutition Disorders; Humans; Oropharynx; Severity of Illness Index; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 32062752
DOI: 10.1007/s11325-020-02037-w -
Journal of Sleep Research Apr 2017This systematic review and meta-analysis explores the association between facial phenotype and obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome in adults. A comprehensive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This systematic review and meta-analysis explores the association between facial phenotype and obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome in adults. A comprehensive electronic (Medline via Ovid, Scopus, and Embase) database and reference search were undertaken in relation to imaging modalities for surface craniofacial assessments in subjects with sleep apnea. The outcome measures were surface facial dimensions, morphology and profile. The quality of studies was assessed and a meta-analysis conducted. The studies were weighted using the inverse variance method, and the random effects model was used to analyse data. This systematic review identified eight case-control studies. In five studies (906 participants), adults with sleep apnea showed increased weighted mean differences in neck circumference by 1.26 mm (P = 0.0001) with extensive heterogeneity between studies (I² = 93%). Only two studies (467 participants) shared the following outcomes: mandible length, lower facial height, mandible width and anterior mandible height parameters. The pooled results demonstrated obstructive sleep apnea syndrome was associated with larger parameters than controls. In conclusion, the surface facial assessment was able to demonstrate some characteristic morphological features, facilitating a meta-analysis, in adults with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. The strength of these findings, however, was limited by the heterogeneity of the studies precluding the identification of a clear phenotype.
Topics: Case-Control Studies; Face; Humans; Mandible; Neck; Phenotype; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 28019049
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.12485 -
Sleep & Breathing = Schlaf & Atmung Dec 2022This systematic review sought to answer the following focused question: "What are the effects of respiratory training devices on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) outcomes... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
This systematic review sought to answer the following focused question: "What are the effects of respiratory training devices on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) outcomes in adults?" METHODS : The acronym "PICOS" was used to determine eligibility criteria, which consists of (P population) = adults with mild to moderate OSA, (I intervention) = spirometry devices or breathing exercises, (C comparison) = compared to no breathing exercises in adults (> 18 years) with mild to moderate OSA, (O outcomes) = improved sleep quality (sleep quality indexes) and improved apnea-hypopnea indexes (AHI), (S study types) = randomized, pseudo-randomized, and non-randomized clinical trials. The search was performed in the following databases: PubMed/Medline, LILACS, Scopus, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, in addition to gray literature through Google Scholar, Proquest, and Open Grey. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool. Meta-analyses of random effects were performed for the outcomes of interest.
RESULTS
A total of 1171 references were found. Applying the eligibility criteria, six studies were included in qualitative synthesis. Expiratory exercises showed a decrease in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) when compared to baseline (MD = - 8.4; 95% CI = - 12.4 to - 4.4; I = 19%). There was a decrease in values compared to baseline (MD = - 4.4; 95% CI = - 8.2 to - 0.6; I = 0%) for the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), when considering the inspiratory exercises. Both groups of breathing exercises showed a significant decrease in the mean index assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).
CONCLUSION
Results of this meta-analysis suggests that breathing exercises lead to a measurable improvement in AHI for patients with mild to moderate OSA, as well as an improvement in sleep quality and daytime sleepiness.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
CRD42020148513 (PROSPERO).
Topics: Adult; Humans; Breathing Exercises; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Exercise; Respiratory Rate; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Clinical Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34850331
DOI: 10.1007/s11325-021-02536-4 -
Eye (London, England) Oct 2023Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) has been thought to be associated with glaucoma, however there are many conflicting studies on this topic. With many new studies having... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) has been thought to be associated with glaucoma, however there are many conflicting studies on this topic. With many new studies having been published since the previous meta-analysis, we believe it is important to clarify this association. Hence, in this study we meta-analyse the recent literature regarding the association between OSA and glaucoma.
METHODS
Pubmed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library were searched from inception till the 28th February 2022 for observational as well as cross-sectional studies examining the association between OSA and glaucoma. Two reviewers selected studies, extracted data, graded the quality of included non-randomized studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The overall quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. Random-effects models were used to meta-analyse the maximally covariate- adjusted associations.
RESULTS
48 studies were included in our systematic review, with 46 suitable for meta-analysis. Total study population was 4,566,984 patients. OSA was associated with a higher risk of glaucoma (OR 3.66, 95% CI 1.70 to 7.90, I = 98%, p < 0.01). After adjustment for various important confounders including age, gender and patient comorbidities such as hyperlipidaemia, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, patients with OSA had up to 40% higher odds of glaucoma. Substantial heterogeneity was eliminated through subgroup and sensitivity analyses after consideration of glaucoma subtype, OSA severity and adjustment for confounders.
CONCLUSIONS
In this meta-analysis, OSA was associated with higher risk of glaucoma, as well as more severe ocular findings characteristic of the glaucomatous disease process. We suggest more clinical studies looking into the effects of OSA treatment on the progression of glaucoma to help clinical decision making for patients.
Topics: Humans; Cross-Sectional Studies; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Glaucoma; Cardiovascular Diseases; Data Collection
PubMed: 36977937
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02471-6 -
Respiratory Medicine Jul 2016Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is difficult to manage for those who are intolerant or noncompliant with standard facial mask treatment options. Current treatment options... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is difficult to manage for those who are intolerant or noncompliant with standard facial mask treatment options. Current treatment options do not address the underlying cause of OSA. Exercise as a treatment option has been found to improve OSA indices.
STUDY OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy of exercise on apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) in adult patients with OSA via a systematic review and meta-analysis. Additional objectives included evaluation of other indices of OSA and well-being in patients after completing an exercise regimen.
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS
Web of Science, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched based on a priori criteria of all studies evaluating the effect of an exercise program on various sleep apnea indices. Both PRISMA statement and MOOSE consensus statement were adhered to. Eight Articles (182 participants) were included: a meta-analysis using a random effects model showed, a decrease in AHI (unstandardized mean difference [USMD], -0.536, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.865 to -0.206, I(2), 20%), reduced Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) (USMD, -1.246, 95% CI, -2.397 to -0.0953, I(2), 0%), and lower body mass index (BMI) (USMD, -0.0473, 95% CI, -0.0375 to 0.280, I(2), 0%), in patients receiving exercise as treatment. Relative risks (RR) and odds ratios (OR) showed decreases in AHI (OR: 72.33, 95% CI, 27.906 to 187.491, RR: 7.294, 95% CI, 4.072 to 13.065) in patients receiving exercise as treatment.
CONCLUSION
Among adult patients with OSA, exercise as the sole intervention was associated with improved clinical outcomes.
Topics: Adult; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Exercise; Exercise Therapy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Polysomnography; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severity of Illness Index; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 27296826
DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2016.05.015