-
Neurosurgical Review Jan 2018Chiari malformation (CM) and basilar invagination (BI) are mesodermal malformations with disproportion between the content and volume of posterior fossa capacity and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Chiari malformation (CM) and basilar invagination (BI) are mesodermal malformations with disproportion between the content and volume of posterior fossa capacity and overcrowding of neural structures at the level of foramen magnum. Several alternatives for posterior approaches are available, including extradural (ED), extra-arachnoidal, and intradural (ID) approaches. The objectives are to evaluate the effect of several surgical techniques for posterior fossa decompression (PFD) in the outcomes of patients with CCJM and to evaluate complications in the techniques reported. A systematic review of the literature on the effects of PFD surgery was performed using the MEDLINE (via PubMed) database and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. The PRISMA statement and MOOSE recommendations were followed. Five hundred and thirty-nine (539) articles were initially selected by publication title. After abstract analysis, 70 articles were selected for full-text analysis, and 43 were excluded. Ultimately, 27 studies were evaluated. The success rate (SR) with ED techniques was 0.76 versus 0.81 in EA technique and 0.83 in IA technique. All posterior fossa decompression techniques were very successful. Results from observational studies were similar to that of the randomized trial. The main complications were CSF fistulas, most common in patients with IA approach. The overall mortality rate was 1%.
Topics: Arnold-Chiari Malformation; Cranial Fossa, Posterior; Decompression, Surgical; Humans; Platybasia
PubMed: 28466256
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-017-0857-5 -
Acta Neurochirurgica Oct 2022As the volume and fidelity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain increase, observation of incidental findings may also increase. We performed a systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
As the volume and fidelity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain increase, observation of incidental findings may also increase. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of various incidental findings.
METHODS
PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS were searched from inception to May 24, 2021. We identified 6536 citations and included 35 reports of 34 studies, comprising 40,777 participants. A meta-analysis of proportions was performed, and age-stratified estimates for each finding were derived from age-adjusted non-linear models.
RESULTS
Vascular abnormalities were observed in 423/35,706 participants (9.1/1000 scans, 95%CI 5.2-14.2), ranging from 2/1000 scans (95%CI 0-7) in 1-year-olds to 16/1000 scans (95%CI 1-43) in 80-year-olds. Of these, 204/34,306 were aneurysms (3.1/1000 scans, 95%CI 1-6.3), which ranged from 0/1000 scans (95%CI 0-5) at 1 year of age to 6/1000 scans (95%CI 3-9) at 60 years. Neoplastic abnormalities were observed in 456/39,040 participants (11.9/1000 scans, 95%CI 7.5-17.2), ranging from 0.2/1000 scans (95%CI 0-10) in 1-year-olds to 34/1000 scans (95%CI 12-66) in 80-year-olds. Meningiomas were the most common, in 246/38,076 participants (5.3/1000 scans, 95%CI 2.3-9.5), ranging from 0/1000 scans (95%CI 0-2) in 1-year-olds to 17/1000 scans (95%CI 4-37) in 80-year-olds. Chiari malformations were observed in 109/27,408 participants (3.7/1000 scans, 95%CI 1.8-6.3), pineal cysts in 1176/32,170 (9/1000 scans, 95%CI 1.8-21.4) and arachnoid cysts in 414/36,367 (8.5/1000 scans, 95%CI 5.8-11.8).
CONCLUSION
Incidental findings are common on brain MRI and may result in substantial resource expenditure and patient anxiety but are often of little clinical significance.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Child; Humans; Incidental Findings; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Prevalence
PubMed: 35525892
DOI: 10.1007/s00701-022-05225-7 -
Brain & Spine 2022Spinal arachnoid cysts (SACs) are rare lesions with challenging and controversial management. (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Spinal arachnoid cysts (SACs) are rare lesions with challenging and controversial management.
RESEARCH QUESTION
We analyzed our experiences from a case series and provide a systematic review to determine 1) Demographic and clinical features of SACs, 2) Optimal imaging for diagnosis and operative planning, 3) Optimal management of SACs, and 4) Clinical outcomes following surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A single-institution, ambispective analysis of patients with symptomatic SACs surgically managed between May 2005 and May 2019 was performed. Data were collected as per local ethics committee stipulations. A systematic review of SACs in adults was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and a preapproved protocol.
RESULTS
Our series consisted of 11 patients, M:F 8:3, mean age 47.8 years (range 18-73 years). Mean follow-up was 19 months (range 5-36 months). SACs were excised or marsupialised (7), fenestrated (3) or partially excised (1). Eight patients had expansile duroplasty, 3 primary dural closure. One patient had a cystoperitoneal shunt. All patients were AIS D preoperatively; 4 remained unchanged and 7 improved to AIS E at follow-up. Our systematic search retrieved 725 citations. Fourteen case series met the inclusion criteria. There was no evidence to support superiority of one surgical strategy over another. Surgery for symptomatic patients resulted in positive clinical outcomes.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Symptomatic SACs require surgical intervention. Limited evidence suggests that decompressing the cord, breakdown of arachnoid adhesions, and establishing CSF flow by consideration of expansile duroplasty are important for positive outcomes.
PubMed: 36248116
DOI: 10.1016/j.bas.2022.100904 -
Headache Feb 2021To report a case of arachnoiditis as a complication of epidural blood patch procedures and to systematically review the diagnostic workup, clinical outcomes, and...
OBJECTIVE
To report a case of arachnoiditis as a complication of epidural blood patch procedures and to systematically review the diagnostic workup, clinical outcomes, and treatment modalities reported in the literature.
BACKGROUND
Epidural blood patching is an effective treatment for low-pressure headache secondary to spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leak or iatrogenic post-dural puncture. Spontaneous intracranial hypotension is believed to be a rare headache disorder, but recently has been diagnosed at higher frequencies, making it an important differential diagnosis for intractable headaches. Arachnoiditis has surfaced as a rare complication of epidural blood patching. Symptom presentation does not always correlate with evidence of meningeal enhancement on imaging. Optimal methods for treatment remain largely unknown.
METHODS
Databases Embase and PubMed were searched for all published studies on arachnoiditis post-epidural blood patch using a combination of the following medical subject headings and keywords: arachnoiditis, arachnoid inflammation, adverse event, and epidural blood patch. All original English-language articles that described arachnoid and/or meningeal inflammation in conjunction with epidural blood patch procedures were included for analysis. Title and abstract screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently and in duplicate by two reviewers.
RESULTS
Seven other cases of arachnoiditis post-blood patch placement have been documented, most of which were diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging. Six of these were a result of a spinal-epidural anesthesia for labor and delivery. Common symptoms reported were headache, back and radicular pain, paresthesia, and motor weakness. There are currently no proven consensus-based treatment recommendations available. While intravenous methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone taper was found to be effective in the case presented, the benefit of other multi-modal therapies was unclear.
CONCLUSIONS
Headache specialists who treat postural headache should be aware of arachnoiditis as a potentially severe complication of epidural blood patch. The case presented is the first of its kind to report arachnoiditis as a complication of high-volume blood patch for the treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension. More studies are required to determine suitable treatment options for post-epidural blood patch arachnoiditis.
Topics: Adult; Arachnoiditis; Blood Patch, Epidural; Female; Humans; Intracranial Hypotension; Male; Post-Dural Puncture Headache; Young Adult
PubMed: 33583044
DOI: 10.1111/head.14076 -
International Journal of Molecular... Aug 2023Giant arachnoid granulations (GAGs) are minimally investigated. Here, we systematically review the available data in published reports to better understand their... (Review)
Review
Giant arachnoid granulations (GAGs) are minimally investigated. Here, we systematically review the available data in published reports to better understand their etiologies, nomenclature, and clinical significance. In the literature, 195 GAGs have been documented in 169 persons of varied ages (range, 0.33 to 91 years; mean, 43 ± 20 years; 54% female). Prior reports depict intrasinus (i.e., dural venous sinus, DVS) (84%), extrasinus (i.e., diploic or calvarial) (15%), and mixed (1%) GAG types that exhibit pedunculated, sessile, or vermiform morphologies. GAG size ranged from 0.4 to 6 cm in maximum dimension (mean, 1.9 ± 1.1 cm) and encompassed symptomatic or non-symptomatic enlarged arachnoid granulations (≥1 cm) as well as symptomatic subcentimeter arachnoid granulations. A significant difference was identified in mean GAG size between sex (females, 1.78 cm; males, 3.39 cm; < 0.05). The signs and symptoms associated with GAGs varied and include headache (19%), sensory change(s) (11%), and intracranial hypertension (2%), among diverse and potentially serious sequelae. Notably, brain herniation was present within 38 GAGs (22%). Among treated individuals, subsets were managed medically (19 persons, 11%), surgically (15 persons, 9%), and/or by endovascular DVS stenting (7 persons, 4%). Histologic workup of 53 (27%) GAG cases depicted internal inflammation (3%), cystic change consistent with fluid accumulation (2%), venous thrombosis (1%), hemorrhage (1%), meningothelial hyperplasia (1%), lymphatic vascular proliferation (1%), and lymphatic vessel obliteration (1%). This review emphasizes heterogeneity in GAG subtypes, morphology, composite, location, symptomatology, and imaging presentations. Additional systematic investigations are needed to better elucidate the pathobiology, clinical effects, and optimal diagnostic and management strategies for enlarged and symptomatic arachnoid granulation subtypes, as different strategies and size thresholds are likely applicable for medical, interventional, and/or surgical treatment of these structures in distinct brain locations.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Brain; Clinical Relevance; Disease Progression; Headache; Vascular Diseases; Arachnoid
PubMed: 37629195
DOI: 10.3390/ijms241613014 -
The Spine Journal : Official Journal of... Aug 2023Secondary spinal arachnoid cysts have rarely been reported but present significant challenges for management. These cysts could be anteriorly located with long... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND CONTEXT
Secondary spinal arachnoid cysts have rarely been reported but present significant challenges for management. These cysts could be anteriorly located with long rostral-caudal extensions and many are related to arachnoiditis, leading to difficult-to-treat disorders. Thus far, due to the scarcity of reports, the features of the disease and the optimal therapeutic strategies remain unclear.
PURPOSE
To investigate clinical features and the optimal treatment modalities of secondary spinal arachnoid cysts compared with primary spinal arachnoid cysts.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic review.
PATIENT SAMPLE
Systematic review identified 103 secondary cases from 80 studies and reports.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Condition of symptom relief and duration of treatment response were analyzed.
METHODS
An electronic literature search of the PubMed database was conducted for studies on secondary spinal arachnoid cysts between 1990 and 2022. Non-English publications, nonhuman studies, reports of a primary cyst, studies not including case details, and studies of nonsymptomatic cases were excluded.
RESULTS
This systematic review included 103 secondary cases. The most commonly reported etiologies were iatrogenic factors, trauma, and subarachnoid hemorrhage, accounting for 88 intradural extramedullary, 11 extradural, one intradural/extradural, one interdural, and one intramedullary spinal arachnoid cyst after a median duration of 30, 12, and 9 months, respectively. Extradural cysts were more prone to occur at dorsal locations and affect thoracic segments (mean cyst length: 3.4 segments). Intradural cysts showed a relatively higher ventral/dorsal ratio (1:1.09, 1.75:1, and 3.50:1 for cysts occurring from iatrogenic factors, trauma, and subarachnoid hemorrhage, respectively) and thoracic distribution, with a mean cyst length of 4.3 segments (5.1 for ventral and 3.5 for dorsal cysts). For intradural cysts, recurrence risk was lower after surgical resection than after fenestration/marsupialization (12-month recurrence risk: 21.43% vs 50.72%, log-rank test: p=.0248, Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon test: p=.0126). In cases treated with shunting, one recurrence (1/8 cases) was noted after external shunting and two recurrences (2/5 cases) after internal shunting at a median follow up of 12 months.
CONCLUSIONS
Secondary spinal arachnoid cysts, particularly intradural cysts, are rarer and more challenging to treat than primary spinal cysts. Although fenestration/marsupialization is the commonly adopted treatment, the recurrence rate is high. For unresectable cysts, shunting procedures, particularly shunting into a body cavity (eg, pleural or peritoneal cavity) away from the subarachnoid space, could be a therapeutic alternative besides fenestration/marupialization, yet its efficacy requires confirmation by more data.
Topics: Humans; Arachnoid Cysts; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Spinal Cord Diseases; Neurosurgical Procedures; Iatrogenic Disease; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 36924909
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.03.002 -
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Jul 2024The Liliequist membrane (LM) represents a crucial yet challenging anatomical structure in neuroanatomy. First observed in 1875 and later elucidated by Bengt Liliequist... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The Liliequist membrane (LM) represents a crucial yet challenging anatomical structure in neuroanatomy. First observed in 1875 and later elucidated by Bengt Liliequist in 1956, the LM's precise anatomical description and boundaries remain complex. Its significance extends to neurosurgery, impacting various procedures like endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomies, aneurysm and tumor surgeries, treatment of suprasellar arachnoid cysts, and managing perimesencephalic hemorrhages. However, a comprehensive understanding of the LM is hindered by inconsistent anatomical descriptions and limitations in available literature, warranting a systematic review.
METHODS
A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar for articles pertaining to Liliequist's membrane. The search employed Mesh terms like "Liliequist membrane," "Liliequist's diaphragm," and related variations. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies exploring the historical evolution, anatomical structure, radiological characteristics, and clinical implications of the LM in neurosurgery.
RESULTS
The search yielded 358 articles, with 276 unique articles screened based on relevance. Following a meticulous screening process, 72 articles underwent full-text assessment, resulting in the inclusion of 5 articles meeting the eligibility criteria. The selected studies varied in methodology, including anatomical dissections, radiological evaluations, and clinical significance in neurosurgical procedures. Insights were derived on LM's anatomical variations, radiological visualization, and its critical role in guiding neurosurgical interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite advancements in understanding its clinical significance and radiological visualization, challenges persist in precisely delineating its boundaries. Further research, especially on embryological development and histological characterization, is essential. Enhancing comprehension of LM-related pathologies is crucial for accurate preoperative planning and optimizing patient outcomes in neurosurgery.
Topics: Humans; Neurosurgical Procedures; History, 20th Century; History, 19th Century; Clinical Relevance
PubMed: 38795689
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108322 -
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia 2010Due to the discomfort caused to patients, failure of subarachnoid blocks that happen occasionally even when properly conducted be the most capable professionals have... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Due to the discomfort caused to patients, failure of subarachnoid blocks that happen occasionally even when properly conducted be the most capable professionals have been described since Bier. However, the concept of failure and especially identification of the causes vary. The objective of this report was to identify the causes of this discomfort through a systematic review of publications with a significant number of patients.
CONTENTS
The analysis was divided in three topics: anatomy and its variations; anesthetic agent, focusing on drug selection, its solutions, and additions to achieve the most appropriate result of the proposed surgery; and the dose, discussing concentration, volume, or gravimetric dose, to obtain the most adequate result regarding the intensity of the blockade and its duration.
CONCLUSIONS
Failures are more commonly secondary to technical factors: adequate anatomic assessment, judicious choice of the needle and puncture site, care when storing the drugs, dose adequacy, and baricity, besides proper patient positioning during and after the puncture, and they all should be adequate for the surgical objective.
Topics: Anesthesia, Spinal; Humans; Subarachnoid Space; Treatment Failure
PubMed: 20169268
DOI: 10.1016/s0034-7094(10)70011-8 -
World Neurosurgery Mar 2024Cerebral vasospasm in patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) continues to be a major source of morbidity despite significant clinical and basic science... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Cerebral vasospasm in patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) continues to be a major source of morbidity despite significant clinical and basic science research. The removal of blood and its degradation products from the subarachnoid space through prophylactic lumbar drainage (LD) is a favorable option. However, several studies have delivered conflicting conclusions on its efficacy after aSAH.
METHODS
Systematic searches of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were performed. The primary outcome was a good functional outcome (modified Rankin scale score, 0-2). Secondary outcomes included symptomatic vasospasm, secondary cerebral infarction, and mortality.
RESULTS
A total of 14 studies reporting on 2473 patients with aSAH were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with the non-LD group, no significant differences were found in the rates of good functional outcomes in the LD group at discharge to 1 month (risk ratio [RR], 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64-2.58) or at 6 months (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.97-1.41). These findings were consistent in the subgroup analyses of only randomized controlled trials or observational studies. LD was associated with lower rates of symptomatic vasospasm (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.48-0.77), secondary cerebral infarction (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45-0.79), and mortality at discharge to 1 month (RR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.41-0.82). The effect on mortality diminished at 6 months (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.34-1.45). However, when analyzing only randomized controlled trials, the benefit of LD on lower rates of mortality continued even at 6 months (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.99).
CONCLUSIONS
For aSAH patients, the use of LD is associated with benefits in the rates of vasospasm, secondary cerebral infarctions, and mortality, without an increased risk of adverse events.
Topics: Humans; Autonomic Nervous System Diseases; Cerebral Infarction; Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak; Drainage; Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; Subarachnoid Space; Treatment Outcome; Vasospasm, Intracranial
PubMed: 38246528
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.062 -
World Neurosurgery Jul 2021The best surgical treatment for adult Chiari malformation type 1 remains widely debated. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Posterior Fossa Decompression and Duraplasty with and without Arachnoid Preservation for the Treatment of Adult Chiari Malformation Type 1: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
The best surgical treatment for adult Chiari malformation type 1 remains widely debated.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to assess the efficacy of posterior fossa decompression and duraplasty with arachnoid preservation compared with arachnoid dissection for the treatment of adult Chiari malformation type 1.
METHODS
Two reviewers (M.O.-G. and M.A.) performed a PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase literature search using the following terms: ("Chiari" OR "Chiari 1") AND ("duraplasty" OR "arachnoid preservation" OR "arachnoid spar∗" OR "posterior fossa surgery" OR "posterior fossa decompression" OR "foramen magnum decompression"). Studies assessing the efficacy of posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty for the treatment of patients aged >18 years with Chiari malformation type 1 were included. Case reports with <10 patients, editorials, and non-English studies were excluded.
RESULTS
Of 195 studies identified, 24 were included for meta-analysis. In the 1006 participants, there was no difference in postoperative clinical or radiologic improvement between the 2 techniques. Patients who underwent posterior fossa decompression with duraplasty and arachnoid dissection had a greater prevalence of total complications (0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.29 vs. 0.09, 95% CI, 0.05-0.14; Q = 6.47; P = 0.01) and cerebrospinal fluid-related complications (0.15, 95% CI, 0.10-0.22 vs. 0.05, 95% CI, 0.02-0.12; Q = 4.88; P = 0.03) compared with arachnoid preservation. Furthermore, the prevalence of reoperation in the arachnoid dissection group was 25 times greater than in the arachnoid preservation group (0.08, 95% CI, 0.06-0.10 vs. 0.003, 95% CI, 0.00-0.02; Q = 10.73; P > 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Posterior fossa decompression and duraplasty with arachnoid preservation is a beneficial technique to treat Chiari malformation type 1 and reduces the risk of complications, particularly cerebrospinal fluid-related complications and the rate of reoperation.
Topics: Arachnoid; Arnold-Chiari Malformation; Cranial Fossa, Posterior; Decompression, Surgical; Humans; Neurosurgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33940274
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.082