-
European Journal of Surgical Oncology :... Apr 2022The hepatic flexure and transverse colon have a complex intermingled lymphovascular anatomy crossing between mesocolon and mesogastrium. Few studies have investigated... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The hepatic flexure and transverse colon have a complex intermingled lymphovascular anatomy crossing between mesocolon and mesogastrium. Few studies have investigated the oncological relevance of metastatic infrapyloric and gastroepiploic lymph nodes (IGLN) from hepatic flexure and transverse colon tumors. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for IGLN metastases, and the indications, surgical morbidities, and oncological outcome following extended lymphadenectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
According to the PRISMA statement, a systematic review on IGLN lymphadenectomy for colon cancer was conducted into PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. A critical appraisal of study was performed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Tools.
RESULTS
Nine studies were included. IGLN metastases incidence ranged 0.7-22%. IGLN positivity for patients with metastatic mesocolic lymph nodes ranged 1.7-33.3%. Postoperative complication rate ranged 8.5-36.9%, mostly low grade according to Clavien-Dindo's classification. Postoperative mortality rate ranged 0-5.4% at 30-days. IGLN metastases were associated with advanced disease with a 5-year progression-free survival rate up to 33.9%. Two authors reported perineural invasion and N stage as risk factors, while another reported endoscopic obstruction, signet ring adenocarcinoma, CEA level ≥17 ng/ml, and M1 stage to be risk factors for IGLN involvement. Apart from one study, all other studies were of moderate/high quality.
CONCLUSIONS
Metastatic IGLNs are not uncommon and should be highly considered. IGLN metastases could be potentially associated with an aggressive disease. IGLN dissection is not associated with higher morbidity and mortality than standard CME. Preoperative risk factors of IGLN involvement could guide surgical indication for extended lymphadenectomy.
Topics: Colectomy; Colon, Ascending; Colon, Transverse; Colonic Neoplasms; Humans; Laparoscopy; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Mesocolon
PubMed: 34893366
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.12.005 -
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Aug 2017Proximal colon adenomas can be missed during routine colonoscopy. Use of a cap or hood on the tip of the colonoscope has been shown to improve overall adenoma detection... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Proximal colon adenomas can be missed during routine colonoscopy. Use of a cap or hood on the tip of the colonoscope has been shown to improve overall adenoma detection with variable rates. However, it has not been systematically evaluated for detection of proximal colon or right-sided adenomas where the cap may have maximum impact on adenoma detection rate (ADR). Our aim was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy (CC) on right-sided ADRs (r-ADRs) compared with standard colonoscopy (SC).
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Cochrane databases as well as secondary sources (bibliographic review of selected articles and major GI proceedings) were searched through October 1, 2016. Primary outcome was the pooled rate of r-ADR. Detection of flat adenoma, sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P), and number of right-sided adenomas per patient were also assessed. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effect models.
RESULTS
We screened 686 records and analyzed data from 4 studies (CC group, 2546 patients; SC group, 2547 patients) that met criteria for determination of r-ADRs, whereas 6 studies (CC group, 3159 patients; SC group, 3137 patients) were analyzed to estimate right-sided adenomas per patient. r-ADR was significantly higher with CC compared with SC (23% vs 17%; OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.08-2.05; I = 79%; P = .01). CC also improved detection rates of flat adenoma (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.35-3.20; P < .01) and SSA/P (OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01-1.74; P = .04). The total number of right-sided adenomas (CC: 1428 [60%] vs SC: 1127 [58%]) and number of right-sided adenomas per patient (CC, .71 ± .5, vs SC, .65 ± .62 [mean ± standard deviation]) were numerically higher for CC but were not statistically significant (P = .43). Approximately 17 CCs would be required to detect an additional patient with right-sided adenoma.
CONCLUSIONS
Use of CC significantly improves the proximal colon ADR. In addition, flat adenoma and serrated colonic lesion detection rates are also significantly higher as compared with SC.
Topics: Adenoma; Colon, Ascending; Colon, Transverse; Colonic Neoplasms; Colonoscopy; Humans
PubMed: 28365356
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.03.1524 -
European Journal of Gastroenterology &... Feb 2018Screening colonoscopy is less effective in preventing proximal colon cancers than distal colon cancers. A repeat examination of the right side of the colon may increase... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Screening colonoscopy is less effective in preventing proximal colon cancers than distal colon cancers. A repeat examination of the right side of the colon may increase the lesion detection. The study aimed to assess the results of a second examination of the right side of the colon with forward-view or retroflexion colonoscopy performed immediately after the initial examination.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We carried out a meta-analysis of all primary studies that performed a second examination of the right side of the colon with forward-view or retroflexion colonoscopy performed immediately after the initial examination.
RESULTS
Six cohorts of five studies with 4155 participants were included in the final study. The adenoma detection rate (ADR) was 28.8% of the combined examinations compared with 24.1% of the single examination (P<0.001), for a pooled odds ratio of 1.34 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13-1.59]. For retroflexion assessment, ADR was achieved in 25.4% patients in the combined group, compared with 22.3% in the single examination group (P=0.002), for a pooled odds ratio of 1.19 (95% CI: 1.06-1.33). For forward-view assessment, ADR was achieved in 46.0% patients in the combined group, compared with 33.5% in the single examination group (P<0.001), for a pooled odds ratio of 1.76 (95% CI: 1.40-2.22).
CONCLUSION
For ADR of the right side of the colon, a repeat examination could lead to a modest improvement in the detection of lesions in the proximal colon, irrespective of forward-view or retroflexion assessment.
Topics: Adenoma; Colon, Ascending; Colon, Transverse; Colonic Neoplasms; Colonoscopy; Early Detection of Cancer; Humans; Population Surveillance
PubMed: 29232250
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001009 -
Gastroenterology Clinics of North... Jun 2024Consensus remains elusive in the definition and indications of multivisceral transplantation (MVT) within the transplant community. MVT encompasses transplantation of... (Review)
Review
Consensus remains elusive in the definition and indications of multivisceral transplantation (MVT) within the transplant community. MVT encompasses transplantation of all organs reliant on the celiac artery axis and the superior mesenteric artery in different combinations. Some institutions classify MVT as involving the grafting of the stomach or ascending colon in addition to the jejunoileal complex. MVT indications span a wide spectrum of conditions, including tumors, intestinal dysmotility disorders, and trauma. This systematic review aims to consolidate existing literature on MVT cases and their indications, providing an organizational framework to comprehend the current criteria for MVT.
Topics: Humans; Celiac Artery; Organ Transplantation; Viscera; Abdomen; Neoplasms; Wounds and Injuries
PubMed: 38719376
DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2024.01.007 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Sep 2013Diaphragmatic disease is rare. This review aims to increase awareness of this condition and its management. (Review)
Review
AIM
Diaphragmatic disease is rare. This review aims to increase awareness of this condition and its management.
METHOD
A literature search was conducted using the key terms 'colon' or 'colonic' in combination with 'diaphragm' or 'diaphragm disease' for publications until August 2012. All cases of colonic diaphragm syndrome were identified and the required data were collected.
RESULTS
Forty-five cases of colon diaphragm disease were included. The highest incidence was in the seventh decade of life, with a female preponderance (40F:5M). Most patients presented with chronic (median 3 months) and multiple symptoms. The median use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was 5 years including diclofenac as the most commonly used NSAID. Colonoscopy was the most informative investigation and the ascending colon was the most common site of diaphragm disease. Nearly two-thirds of the patients were treated by discontinuing NSAID treatment combined with other forms of treatment, mostly surgery.
CONCLUSION
Diaphragm disease of the colon is a rare condition associated with long-term use of NSAIDs with a range of presentations and symptoms. Based on this review, when colon diaphragm disease is diagnosed we would recommend a trial cessation of NSAIDs. Therapeutic endoscopic techniques should be considered but surgery may be required for definitive treatment.
Topics: Age Distribution; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Colon, Ascending; Colonic Diseases; Colonoscopy; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sex Distribution; Syndrome
PubMed: 23517116
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12218 -
Digestive and Liver Disease : Official... Oct 2017Microscopic colitis (MC) is a clinical syndrome of severe watery diarrhea with few or no endoscopic abnormalities. The incidence of MC is reported similar to that of... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Microscopic colitis (MC) is a clinical syndrome of severe watery diarrhea with few or no endoscopic abnormalities. The incidence of MC is reported similar to that of other inflammatory bowel diseases. The need for histological confirmation of MC frequently guides reimbursement health policies. With the advent of high-definition (HD) coloscopes, the incidence of reporting distinct endoscopic findings in MC has risen. This has the potential to improve timely diagnosis and cost-effective MC management and diminish the workload and costs of busy modern endoscopy units.
METHODS
Publications on distinct endoscopic findings in MC available until March 31st, 2017 were searched systematically (electronic and manual) in PubMed database. The following search terms/descriptors were used: collagenous colitis (CC) OR lymphocytic colitis (LC) AND endoscopy, colonoscopy, findings, macroscopic, erythema, mucosa, vasculature, scars, lacerations, fractures. An additional search for MC AND perforation was made.
RESULTS
Eighty (n=80) articles, predominantly single case reports (n=49), were found. Overall, 1582 (1159F; 61.6±14.1 years) patients (pts) with MC and endoscopic findings were reported. The majority of articles (n=62) were on CC (pts 756; 77.5% females). We identified 16 papers comprising 779 pts (69.2% females) with LC and 7 articles describing 47 pts (72.3% females) diagnosed as MC. The youngest patient was 10 and the oldest a 97-year-old. Aside diarrhea, symptoms included abdominal pain, weight loss, bloating, flatulence, edema and others. In the study group we found 615 (38.8%) persons with macroscopic lesions in gut. Isolated linear ulcerations were identified in 7 pts (1.1%) while non-ulcerous lesions i.e. pseudomembranes, a variable degree of vasculature pruning & dwindling, mucosal lacerations and abnormalities such as erythema/edema/nodularity, or surface textural alteration in 608 pts (98.1%). The location of endoscopic findings was not reported in 27 articles. The distinct endoscopic findings were described in the left (descending, sigmoid, rectum - 10/21/11 studies), right (cecum, ascending - 7/7 studies), transverse colon (n=12), as well as duodenum (n=4), and terminal ileum (n=2). In 17 (1.1%) pts colonic perforation occurred.
CONCLUSION
Endoscopic findings are recognized with increased frequency in pts with MC. This could improve MC diagnosis by prompting a more extensive biopsy protocol in such cases and an earlier initiation of treatment. Procedure-related perforation has been reported in this group; therefore, cautious air insufflation is advisable when endoscopic findings are recognised.
Topics: Biopsy; Colitis, Microscopic; Colon; Colonoscopy; Humans; Intestinal Perforation
PubMed: 28847471
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.07.015 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Apr 2014A meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcome of single incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with standard multiport laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
A meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcome of single incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with standard multiport laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.
METHOD
A systematic search of databases was carried out to extract comparative studies (randomized and non-randomized, prospective and retrospective). Data were analysed according to Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. A meta-analysis was performed when the data permitted this form of analysis.
RESULTS
Nine comparative studies were retrieved comprising 241 patients with single incision and standard laparoscopy. None of these was randomized. There was no significant difference between the two methods for the primary end-points of mortality, morbidity and cancer-specific parameters and for the secondary end-points of operation time, blood loss, ileus, hospital stay and conversion. It was not possible to analyse pain and cosmetics data owing to insufficient information.
CONCLUSION
Single incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy is comparable with standard multiport laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in primary and secondary outcomes. Given current information it is justified to use single incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy, but there is a need for a prospective randomized study.
Topics: Colectomy; Colon, Ascending; Colonic Diseases; Colonic Neoplasms; Colonic Polyps; Crohn Disease; Diverticulosis, Colonic; Humans; Laparoscopy; Lymph Node Excision; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24354622
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12526 -
Neurogastroenterology and Motility Jun 2016Treatments for functional constipation (FC) and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) differ, but symptom criteria do not reliably distinguish between them;... (Review)
Review
Treatments for functional constipation (FC) and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) differ, but symptom criteria do not reliably distinguish between them; some regard FC and IBS-C as parts of a single constipation spectrum. Our goal was to review studies comparing FC and IBS-C to identify possible biomarkers that separate them. A systematic review identified 15 studies that compared physiologic tests in FC vs IBS-C. Pain thresholds were lower in IBS-C than FC for 3/5 studies and not different in 2/5. Colonic motility was decreased more in FC than IBS-C for 3/3 studies, and whole gut transit was delayed more in FC than IBS-C in 3/8 studies and not different in 5/8. Pelvic floor dyssynergia was unrelated to diagnosis. Sympathetic arousal, measured in only one study, was greater in IBS-C than FC. The most reliable separation of FC from IBS-C was shown by a novel new magnetic resonance imaging technique described in this issue of the journal. These authors showed that drinking one liter of polyethylene glycol laxative significantly increased water content in the small intestine, volume of contents in the ascending colon, and time to first evacuation in FC vs IBS-C; and resulted in less colon motility and delayed whole gut transit in FC compared to IBS-C. Although replication is needed, this well-tolerated, non-invasive test promises to become a new standard for differential diagnosis of FC vs IBS-C. These data suggest that FC and IBS-C are different disorders rather than points on a constipation spectrum.
Topics: Biomarkers; Constipation; Diagnosis, Differential; Gastrointestinal Motility; Gastrointestinal Transit; Humans; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Laxatives
PubMed: 27214096
DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12852 -
Translational Cancer Research Jun 2023The effect of cholecystectomy on the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) has prompted a large number of population-based studies. However, the results of these...
BACKGROUND
The effect of cholecystectomy on the development of colorectal cancer (CRC) has prompted a large number of population-based studies. However, the results of these studies are debatable and inconclusive. Our aim in the present study was to conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the causality between cholecystectomy and CRC.
METHODS
Cohort studies published in the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases up to May 2022 were retrieved. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were analyzed using a random effects model.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies, involving 1,469,880 cholecystectomy and 2,356,238 non-cholecystectomy cases, were eligible for the final analysis. Cholecystectomy was not associated with the development of CRC (P=0.109), colon cancer (P=0.112), or rectal cancer (P=0.184). Subgroup analysis of sex, lag period, geographic region, and study quality revealed no significant differences in the relationship between cholecystectomy and CRC. Interestingly, cholecystectomy was significantly associated with right-sided colon cancer (RR =1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.38; P=0.010), especially in the cecum, the ascending colon and/or the hepatic flexure (RR =1.21, 95% CI: 1.05-1.40; P=0.007) but not in the transverse, descending, or sigmoid colon.
CONCLUSIONS
Cholecystectomy has no effect on the risk of CRC overall, but a harmful effect on the risk of right-sided colon cancer proximally.
PubMed: 37434692
DOI: 10.21037/tcr-22-2049 -
Techniques in Coloproctology Feb 2018Cecal volvulus is a rare clinical entity with an average incidence of 2.8-7.1 per million people per year, accounting for 1-2% of all large bowel obstructions. Cecal... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cecal volvulus is a rare clinical entity with an average incidence of 2.8-7.1 per million people per year, accounting for 1-2% of all large bowel obstructions. Cecal bascule is the rarest type of cecal volvulus, accounting for 5-20% of all cases. Although several case reports have been published, there is no consensus regarding its diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study was to review the literature on cecal bascule in order to summarize the etiopathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment options.
METHODS
The PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases were systematically searched by two independent authors. Cecal bascule was defined as anterior displacement of the distended cecum on the ascending colon without any torsion. The etiopathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment options were analyzed.
RESULTS
Nineteen previously published papers reporting on 26 patients were included. The mean age of patients from previously reported cases was 55.1 ± 19.2 years, and 54% of all patients were males. Presenting symptoms included abdominal pain in 16 (61%), distension in 22 (84%), and vomiting in eight patients (30%). The mean time to diagnosis was 3.6 ± 2.6 days. The extent of surgery varied from cecopexy to right colectomy. There was no postoperative mortality. Cecal bascule recurred one 1 year after index surgery in one patient.
CONCLUSIONS
Cecal bascule is a rare clinical entity, which is mostly encountered in patients with peritoneal adhesions, mobile cecum, bowel dysfunction, and cecal displacement. In patients with recurrent or persistent abdominal pain and distension, cecal bascule should be considered. The majority of these patients require surgical management.
Topics: Cecal Diseases; Cecum; Colectomy; Female; Humans; Intestinal Volvulus; Male; Middle Aged
PubMed: 29159782
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1725-6