-
Pediatrics Mar 2014Dexamethasone has been proposed as an equivalent therapy to prednisone/prednisolone for acute asthma exacerbations in pediatric patients. Although multiple small trials... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Dexamethasone has been proposed as an equivalent therapy to prednisone/prednisolone for acute asthma exacerbations in pediatric patients. Although multiple small trials exist, clear consensus data are lacking. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether intramuscular or oral dexamethasone is equivalent or superior to a 5-day course of oral prednisone or prednisolone. The primary outcome of interest was return visits or hospital readmissions.
METHODS
A search of PubMed (Medline) through October 19, 2013, by using the keywords dexamethasone or decadron and asthma or status asthmaticus identified potential studies. Six randomized controlled trials in the emergency department of children ≤18 years of age comparing dexamethasone with prednisone/prednisolone for the treatment of acute asthma exacerbations were included. Data were abstracted by 4 authors and verified by a second author. Two reviewers evaluated study quality independently and interrater agreement was assessed.
RESULTS
There was no difference in relative risk (RR) of relapse between the 2 groups at any time point (5 days RR 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-1.78, Q = 1.86, df = 3, I2 = 0.0%, 10-14 days RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.77-1.67, Q = 0.84, df = 2, I2 = 0.0%, or 30 days RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.03-56.93). Patients who received dexamethasone were less likely to experience vomiting in either the emergency department (RR 0.29, 95% CI 0.12-0.69, Q = 3.78, df = 3, I2 = 20.7%) or at home (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.14-0.74, Q = 2.09, df = 2, I2 = 4.2%).
CONCLUSIONS
Practitioners should consider single or 2-dose regimens of dexamethasone as a viable alternative to a 5-day course of prednisone/prednisolone.
Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Asthma; Child; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dexamethasone; Humans
PubMed: 24515516
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-2273 -
Nutricion Hospitalaria Aug 2023Objective: To evaluate the role of probiotics in the treatment of asthma patients by meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Objective: To evaluate the role of probiotics in the treatment of asthma patients by meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and other databases were searched by computer, and the relevant literature on the treatment of asthma by probiotics that met the inclusion criteria was screened by manual retrieval. Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4 software and the combined effect was evaluated by odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) and 95 % confidence interval (CI). Results: a total of ten references were included, all of which were randomized controlled studies, and a total of 1,101 people were investigated. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) (MD = -7.17, 95 % CI: -12.81, -1.54), asthma symptom severity (MD = -0.07, 95 % CI: -0.10, -0.04), Childhood Asthma Control Test (CACT) (MD = 2.26, 95 % CI: 1.14, 3.39), and the number of acute episodes of asthma (OR = 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.19, 0.47) in the probiotics group were better than those in the control group. There was no significant difference in forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) (MD = 0.11, 95 % CI: -0.05, 0.26) and FEV1/FVC (%) (MD = 0.32, 95 % CI: -1.48, 2.12). Conclusion: the use of probiotics in patients with asthma can improve lung inflammation and asthma symptoms, reduce the number of asthma attacks, and have no effect on lung function.
Topics: Humans; Child; Asthma; Respiratory Function Tests; Probiotics
PubMed: 37073761
DOI: 10.20960/nh.04360 -
Minerva Pediatrica Dec 2017Autism Spectrum Disorder represents a burdensome condition in early childhood, with a number of risk factors proposed to explain its pathogenesis, most of which without... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Autism Spectrum Disorder represents a burdensome condition in early childhood, with a number of risk factors proposed to explain its pathogenesis, most of which without a reliable scientific basis. Allergic asthma is likely to be one of the possible comorbilities of autism.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
In this paper, the relationship between autism and allergic asthma was analyzed through a systematic literature review, conducted according to the PRISMA Guidelines. The review was performed on PubMed and Science Direct database and covered the period January 1, 2004-July 9, 2016. The search was limited to articles published in peer-reviewed journals. The obtained results were sorted by relevance and the most significant case-control, epidemiological and nationwide-based works associating autism and allergic asthma in humans were selected.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
A slight correlation between these conditions has been found in more than a half studies selected, suggesting a possible association between the two diseases. Small sample sizes of some works and some methodological limitations rise uncertainty about this link.
CONCLUSIONS
Autism Spectrum Disorder and asthma could be associated conditions, as evidenced by the higher prevalence of asthma in autistic children with respect to typically developed controls, with also a verisimilar biological basis. Despite that, future studies are required to provide more reliable data, also by employing animal models, to better clarify this, still unsure, relationship. Methods for study selection and inclusion criteria were specified in advance and documented in PROSPERO protocol #CRD42014012851.
Topics: Animals; Asthma; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Autistic Disorder; Child; Humans; Prevalence; Research Design; Risk Factors
PubMed: 27706122
DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4946.16.04623-5 -
Journal of Pediatric Nursing 2022The association between serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) level and asthma occurrence in children was controversial. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PROBLEM
The association between serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD) level and asthma occurrence in children was controversial.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
The Pubmed, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library were systematically searched up to April 13th 2020. All the study measured the serum 25-OHD level in children, or classified the children based on the 25-OHD level into severe vitamin D deficiency, insufficient deficiency and comparing the prevalence of asthma in childhood were included in our study.
SAMPLE
A total of 35 studies were included in our meta-analysis. Among them, 24 studies were included for analyzing the association between 25-OHD level and asthma, and 12 studies evaluated the treatment effect of vitamin D.
RESULTS
The children with asthma (5711 participants) had significant lower 25-OHD level than children without asthma (21,561 participants) (21.7 ng/ml versus 26.5 ng/ml, SMD = -1.36, 95% = -2.40--0.32, P = 0.010). Besides, the children with asthma treated with vitamin D supplement had a significantly lower recurrence rate than the placebo group (18.4% versus 35.9%, RR = 0.35, 95%CI = 0.35-0.79, P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS
Children with asthma had a lower 25-OHD level than healthy children. Vitamin D supplement could decrease the asthma recurrence rate in the follow-up years.
IMPLICATIONS
This study implies that lower 25-OHD may cause asthma in childhood.
Topics: Asthma; Child; Dietary Supplements; Humans; Vitamin D; Vitamin D Deficiency
PubMed: 34366195
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.07.005 -
The Journal of Asthma : Official... Jun 2016The purpose of this article is to synthesize the current literature on parent and child asthma illness representations and their consequent impact on parent-child asthma... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this article is to synthesize the current literature on parent and child asthma illness representations and their consequent impact on parent-child asthma shared management.
DATA SOURCES
This systematic review was conducted in concordance with the PRISMA statement. An electronic search of five computerized databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane, and EMBASE) was conducted using the following key words: asthma, illness representation, and child. Due to the limited number of articles identified, the search was broadened to include illness perceptions as well.
STUDY SELECTIONS
Studies were included if they were specific to asthma and included parent and/or child asthma illness representations or perception, were published after 2000, and available in English. Fifteen articles were selected for inclusion. All of the articles are descriptive studies that used cross-sectional designs. Seven of the studies used parent and child participants, eight used parents only, and none used only child participants.
RESULTS
None of the selected studies describe child asthma illness representations, and only three describe parental asthma illness representations. Domains of illness representations, including symptoms, timeline, consequences, cause, and controllability were described in the remaining articles. Symptoms and controllability appear to have the most influence on parental asthma management practices. Parents prefer symptomatic or intermittent asthma management and frequently cite concerns regarding daily controller medication use. Parents also primarily rely on their own objective symptom observations rather than the child's report of symptoms.
CONCLUSION
Asthma illness representations are an important area of future study to better understand parent-child shared asthma management.
Topics: Asthma; Child; Humans; Parents; Perception
PubMed: 26785738
DOI: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1116088 -
PloS One 2022Determining the status of asthma control and identifying risk factors for poor asthma control is a key strategy for curbing the negative health impacts and the financial... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Determining the status of asthma control and identifying risk factors for poor asthma control is a key strategy for curbing the negative health impacts and the financial burden of the disease. Therefore, this review was aimed to determine the rate of asthma control and assess the predictors of uncontrolled asthma in Ethiopia.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar searches were performed using key terms; "asthma, bronchial asthma, control, controlled, uncontrolled and Ethiopia" up to October 16, 2020. University repositories were also searched to retrieve gray literature. The results were presented as a prevalence rate with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to identify the sources of heterogeneity in the outcomes.
RESULTS
From 1,388 patients, based on the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) symptom control, the rate of the uncontrolled asthma was 45.0% (95% CI 34.0% - 56.0%) with a considerable heterogeneity between the studies; (I2: 94.55, p< 0.001). About 19.0% (95% CI 10.0% - 29.0%); (I2: 96.04, p< 0.001) of the asthma patients had a well-controlled asthma. Moreover, 36.0% (95% CI 22.0% - 50.0%), (I2: 97.11, p< 0.001) of patients had a partly controlled asthma. Similarly, based on the asthma control test (ACT), the rate of well-controlled asthma was 22.0% (95% CI 3% - 42.0%), with considerable heterogeneity between the studies; (I2: 97.75, p< 0.001). The most frequent predictors of uncontrolled asthma were incorrect inhalation techniques, frequent SABA use, moderate/severe persistent asthma, history of exacerbations, presence of comorbidities, use of oral corticosteroids, and irregular follow-up.
CONCLUSION
The rate of uncontrolled asthma in Ethiopia was high. Several factors are associated with uncontrolled asthma. Comprehensive asthma educations at each follow-up visit should be strengthened to minimize the morbidity and the cost of uncontrolled asthma.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Ethiopia; Female; Humans; Male; Prevalence; Risk Factors
PubMed: 35025962
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262566 -
Maturitas Nov 2012To review the available literature to determine whether the menopausal transition is associated with asthma incidence. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To review the available literature to determine whether the menopausal transition is associated with asthma incidence.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort and cross-sectional studies providing a definition/assessment of menopausal status, incidence or prevalence of a defined diagnosis of asthma, and providing a measure of the association or of menopausal state and asthma or enough data for a calculation of this association. Where possible these meta-analytic estimates were also stratified by intake of menopausal hormone therapy (MHT).
RESULTS
Of 76 potentially relevant articles, 8 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review, and 6 in the meta-analysis. There was heterogeneity across studies: four studies reported slightly increased prevalence rates of asthma in post-menopause, one large cohort yielded a lower asthma incidence and one cross-sectional study a lower prevalence in post-menopause. Overall, the meta-analysis showed no significant association between menopause and asthma rates. When stratifying by use of MHT, the association between menopause and asthma rates was increased in women reporting use of MHT (RR 1.32, 95%CI 1.01-1.74), but not in women not using MHT.
CONCLUSION
We found no significant association of menopause with asthma prevalence or incidence except for women reporting use of MHT. However, these findings result from a small number of studies, including only 1 large cohort with incidence rates for pre- as well as post-menopause. Further studies are needed addressing more closely subgroup analyses and a possible modification of the association of menopause and asthma by MHT.
Topics: Asthma; Estrogen Replacement Therapy; Humans; Menopause
PubMed: 22964072
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.08.010 -
Psychological Medicine Jan 2021Background: Growing evidence from observational studies indicates a high prevalence of anxiety in asthma. However, prevalence rates of coexisting anxiety symptoms and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Background: Growing evidence from observational studies indicates a high prevalence of anxiety in asthma. However, prevalence rates of coexisting anxiety symptoms and comorbid anxiety disorders vary widely across studies. We aimed to evaluate the associations between anxiety and asthma and provide more precise comorbidity estimates.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed the literature from case-controlled studies and conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled prevalence estimates and risks of anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders in asthma individuals. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were undertaken following PRISMA guidelines for preferred reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled prevalence rates. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3. Multiple databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, PsychINFO, and PsycARTICLES were searched for publications before 1 December 2019. The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (ref: CRD42020176028).
RESULTS
In total, 19 studies involving 106813 participants were included. The pooled prevalence of anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders in individuals with asthma was 0.32 (95% CI 0.22-0.43) and 0.24 (95% CI 0.13-0.41), respectively. The risks of coexisting anxiety symptoms and comorbid anxiety disorders were significantly higher in asthma patients than in non-asthma controls indicated by OR 1.89 (95% CI 1.42-2.52; Z = 4.37; p < 0.001) and OR 2.08 (95% CI 1.70-2.56; Z = 6.97; p < 0.001), respectively. Anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders occur at increased frequency among patients with asthma.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings highlight the need for appropriate assessments for these comorbid conditions, which may help to identify a subgroup of patients who might benefit from interventions designed to reduce anxiety and enhance the quality of life.
Topics: Anxiety; Asthma; Case-Control Studies; Humans
PubMed: 33431086
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291720005097 -
European Respiratory Review : An... Jan 2017Asthma is a chronic, inflammatory lung disease affecting around 235 million people worldwide. Conventional medications in asthma are not curative and patients have... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Asthma is a chronic, inflammatory lung disease affecting around 235 million people worldwide. Conventional medications in asthma are not curative and patients have significant concerns regarding their side-effects. Consequently, many asthma patients turn to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for a more holistic approach to care. We systematically reviewed the available evidence on the effectiveness of CAM in the management of asthma in adults.We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and Cochrane databases for randomised controlled trials published in English between 1990 and 2016 investigating the effectiveness of oral or topical CAM in asthmatic adults. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.In all, 23 eligible trials were identified covering 19 different CAMs. Overall, there was limited evidence on the effectiveness of CAM in adult asthma as most CAMs were only assessed in a single trial. CAMs with multiple trials provided null or inconsistent results. Many of the trials were rated as having high risk of bias.The existing evidence is insufficient to recommend any of the oral and topical CAMs in the management of asthma in adults.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Chi-Square Distribution; Complementary Therapies; Female; Holistic Health; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 28143878
DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0092-2016 -
Pediatric Allergy and Immunology :... Jan 2022Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is highly prevalent and often coexists with asthma exacerbation. Divergent findings about the association between the two diseases... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is highly prevalent and often coexists with asthma exacerbation. Divergent findings about the association between the two diseases were reported. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether there exists an association between GORD and asthma.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and other databases and then performed a manual search, to identify eligible studies. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using fixed- and random-effect models. We evaluated the quality of included studies, explored heterogeneity between studies, undertook subgroup analyses, assessed publication bias, and performed sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS
We identified 32 eligible studies, conducted in 14 countries and including a total of 1,612,361 patients of all ages. Overall, GORD shows a weak association with asthma exacerbation (OR = 1.27; 95% CI 1.18-1.35). This association was observed in cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional designs and in European as well as non-European populations. Subgroup analyses show that GORD is associated with frequent asthma exacerbations (≥3 exacerbations, OR = 1.59; 95% CI 1.13-2.24) and with exacerbations needing oral corticosteroid therapy (OR = 1.24; 95% CI 1.09-1.41). GORD pediatric patients are at higher odds of asthma exacerbation than adults. We did not detect any evidence of publication bias and the association between GORD and asthma exacerbation held in all undertaken sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSIONS
Gastroesophageal reflux disease and asthma exacerbation are weakly associated.
Topics: Adult; Asthma; Case-Control Studies; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans
PubMed: 34448255
DOI: 10.1111/pai.13655