-
Journal of Pineal Research Dec 2023Pineal region tumors (PTs) represent extremely rare pathologies, characterized by highly heterogeneous histological patterns. Most of the available evidence for Gamma... (Review)
Review
Pineal region tumors (PTs) represent extremely rare pathologies, characterized by highly heterogeneous histological patterns. Most of the available evidence for Gamma Knife radiosurgical (GKSR) treatment of PTs arises from multimodal regimens, including GKSR as an adjuvant modality or as a salvage treatment at recurrence. We aimed to gather existing evidence on the topic and analyze single-patient-level data to address the efficacy and safety of primary GKSR. This is a systematic review of the literature (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Science Direct) and pooled analysis of single-patient-level data. A total of 1054 original works were retrieved. After excluding duplicates and irrelevant works, we included 13 papers (n = 64 patients). An additional 12 patients were included from the authors' original series. A total of 76 patients reached the final analysis; 56.5% (n = 43) received a histological diagnosis. Confirmed lesions included pineocytoma WHO grade I (60.5%), pineocytoma WHO grade II (14%), pineoblastoma WHO IV (7%), pineal tumor with intermediate differentiation WHO II/III (4.7%), papillary tumor of pineal region WHO II/III (4.7%), germ cell tumor (2.3%), neurocytoma WHO I (2.3%), astrocytoma WHO II (2.3%) and WHO III (2.3%). Presumptive diagnoses were achieved in the remaining 43.5% (n = 33) of cases and comprised of pineocytoma (9%), germ cell tumor (6%), low-grade glioma (6%), high-grade glioma (3%), meningioma (3%) and undefined in 73%. The mean age at the time of GKSR was 38.7 years and the mean lesional volume was 4.2 ± 4 cc. All patients received GKSR with a mean marginal dose of 14.7 ± 2.1 Gy (50% isodose). At a median 36-month follow-up, local control was achieved in 80.3% of cases. Thirteen patients showed progression after a median time of 14 months. Overall mortality was 13.2%. The median OS was not reached for all included lesions, except high-grade gliomas (8mo). The 3-year OS was 100% for LGG and pineal tumors with intermediate differentiation, 91% for low-grade pineal lesions, 66% for high-grade pineal lesions, 60% for germ cell tumors (GCTs), 50% for HGG, and 82% for undetermined tumors. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 100% for LGG and pineal intermediate tumors, 86% for low-grade pineal, 66% for high-grade pineal, 33.3% for GCTs, and 0% for HGG. Median PFS was 5 months for HGG and 34 months for GCTs. The radionecrosis rate was 6%, and cystic degeneration was observed in 2%. Ataxia as a presenting symptom strongly predicted mortality (odds ratio [OR] 104, p = .02), while GCTs and HGG histology well predicted PD (OR: 13, p = .04). These results support the efficacy and safety of primary GKSR treatment of PTs. Further studies are needed to validate these results, which highlight the importance of the initial presumptive diagnosis for choosing the best therapeutic strategy.
Topics: Humans; Pinealoma; Radiosurgery; Brain Neoplasms; Melatonin; Pineal Gland; Glioma; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal
PubMed: 37705383
DOI: 10.1111/jpi.12910 -
Neurology India 2022Different variant of GBM has been reported viz. Epithelioid Glioblastoma (GBM-E), Rhabdoid GBM (GBM-R), Small cell GBM (GBM-SC), Giant cell GBM (GBM-GC), GBM with neuro...
OBJECTIVES
Different variant of GBM has been reported viz. Epithelioid Glioblastoma (GBM-E), Rhabdoid GBM (GBM-R), Small cell GBM (GBM-SC), Giant cell GBM (GBM-GC), GBM with neuro ectodermal differentiation (GBM-PNET) with unknown behavior.
MATERIALS
We conducted a systematic review and individual patient data analysis of these rare GBM variants. We searched PubMed, google search, and Cochrane library for eligible studies till July 1 2016 published in English language and collected data regarding age, sex, subtype and treatment received, Progression Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS). Statistical Package for social sciences (SPSS) v16 software was used for all statistical analysis.
RESULTS
We retrieved data of 196 patients with rare GBM subtypes. Among these GBM-GC is commonest (51%), followed by GBM-R (19%), GBM-PNET (13%), GBM-SC (9%) and GBM-E (8%). Median age at diagnosis was 38, 40, 43.5, 69.5 and 18 years, respectively. Male: female ratio was 2:1 for GBM-E, and 1:3 for GBM-SC. Maximal safe resection followed by adjuvant local radiation was used for most of the patients. However, 6 patients with GBM-PNET, 3 each of GBM-E, GBM-SC received adjuvant craniospinal radiation. Out of 88 patients who received chemotherapy, 64 received Temozolomide alone or combination chemotherapy containing Temozolomide. Median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 9 and 16 months. In univariate analysis, patient with a Gross Total Resection had significantly better PFS and OS compared to those with a Sub Total Resection [23 vs. 13 months (p-0.01)]. Median OS for GBM PNET, GBM-GC, GBM-SC, GBM-R and GBM-E were 32, 18.3, 11, 12 and 7.7 months, respectively (P = 0.001). Interestingly, 31.3%, 37.8% of patients with GBM-E, GBM-R had CSF dissemination.
CONCLUSION
Overall cohort of rarer GBM variant has equivalent survival compared to GBM not otherwise specified. However, epithelioid and Rhabdoid GBM has worst survival and one third shows CSF dissemination.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Glioblastoma; Temozolomide; Data Analysis; Brain Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Neuroectodermal Tumors, Primitive; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating
PubMed: 36352613
DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.359222 -
Pediatric Blood & Cancer Feb 2024Image-guided core-needle biopsy (IGCNB) is a widely used and valuable clinical tool for tissue diagnosis of pediatric neuroblastoma. However, open surgical biopsy... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Image-guided core-needle or surgical biopsy for neuroblastoma diagnosis in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis from the International Society of Pediatric Surgical Oncology (IPSO).
BACKGROUND
Image-guided core-needle biopsy (IGCNB) is a widely used and valuable clinical tool for tissue diagnosis of pediatric neuroblastoma. However, open surgical biopsy remains common practice even if children undergo more invasive and painful procedures. This review aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy and safety of IGCNBs in pediatric patients with neuroblastoma.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review of peer-reviewed original articles published between 1980 and 2023, by searching "pediatric oncology," "biopsy," "interventional radiology," and "neuroblastoma." Exclusion criteria were patients older than 18 years, studies concerning non-neurogenic tumors, case reports, and language other than English. Both the systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.
RESULTS
A total of 533 abstracts articles were analyzed. Of these, eight retrospective studies met inclusion criteria (490 infants, 270 surgical biopsies [SB], 220 image-guided biopsies). Tissue adequacy for primary diagnosis (SB: n = 265, 98%; IGCNB: n = 199, 90%; p = .1) and biological characterization (SB: n = 186, 95%; IGCNB: n = 109, 89%; p = .15) was similar with both biopsy techniques, while intraoperative transfusion rate (SB: n = 51, 22%; IGCNB: n = 12, 6%; p = .0002) and complications (%) (SB: n = 58, 21%; IGCNB: n = 14, 6%; p = .005) were higher with surgical biopsy. Length of stay was similar in both groups; however, no additional data about concurrent diagnostic or treatment procedures were available in the analyzed studies.
CONCLUSIONS
IGCNB is a safe and effective strategic approach for diagnostic workup of NB and should be considered in preferance to SB wherever possible.
Topics: Infant; Child; Humans; Surgical Oncology; Retrospective Studies; Neuroblastoma; Image-Guided Biopsy
PubMed: 38015091
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30789 -
Journal of Experimental & Clinical... May 2015CD133 and Nestin, as the markers of cancer stem cells, have recently been reported frequently in the pathogenesis and development of human gliomas. However, the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
CD133 and Nestin, as the markers of cancer stem cells, have recently been reported frequently in the pathogenesis and development of human gliomas. However, the prognostic role of CD133 and Nestin in gliomas still remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the association between the expression of CD133 and Nestin and the outcome of glioma patients by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
We performed systematically electronic and manual searches through the database of Pubmed and embase (until to December 25, 2014) for titles and abstracts which investigated the relationships between CD133 and Nestin expression and outcome of glioma patients. A systematic review and meta-analysis was executed to generate Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS
A total of 1,490 patients from 32 studies (13 articles) were included in the analysis. 19 studies and 13 studies investigated correlation between CD133 expression or Nestin and survival in gliomas, respectively. Our results showed that high CD133 expression in patients with glioma was associated with poor prognosis in terms of OS (HR 1.69; 95 % CI, 1.16-2.47; P =0.0060) and PFS (HR, 1.64; 95 % CI, 1.12-2.39; P = 0.010). In addition, high Nestin expression were associated with worse OS (HR 1.751; 95 % CI, 1.19-2.58, p = 0.004) but has no significant association with PFS (HR 1.55; 95 % CI, 0.96-2.51, p = 0.074). Even more important, the results of the subgroup meta-analyses show that that high CD133 expression was associated with worse prognosis in terms of OS and PFS in patients with WHO IV glioma but not WHO II-III. On the other hand, Nestin high expression was associated with worse prognosis in terms of OS and PFS in patients with WHO II-III glioma but not WHO IV.
CONCLUSION
High level of CD133 expression trends to correlate with a worse OS and PFS in glioma patients, especially WHO IV gliomas and Nestin high expression trends to correlate with a worse OS in glioma patients especially WHO II-III, revealing both the markers of cancer stem cells may as the potential pathological prognostic markers for glioma patients.
Topics: AC133 Antigen; Antigens, CD; Biomarkers, Tumor; Female; Gene Expression; Glioma; Glycoproteins; Humans; Male; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Nestin; Peptides; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Publication Bias; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 25967234
DOI: 10.1186/s13046-015-0163-4 -
Arkhiv Patologii 2018Gemistocytic astrocytomas (GA) are a variant of diffuse astrocytomas GII (WHO, 2016). Like all diffuse astrocytomas, GA recur with time, which is often accompanied by...
Gemistocytic astrocytomas (GA) are a variant of diffuse astrocytomas GII (WHO, 2016). Like all diffuse astrocytomas, GA recur with time, which is often accompanied by malignant degeneretion into the anaplastic astrocytoma GIII or to the secondary glioblastoma GIV. However, the progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with GA is less than in patients with diffuse astrocytomas. Given that this group of patients, according to the WHO classification (2016), is classified as GII, patients with GA usually do not receive comprehensive treatment. We have conducted a thorough analysis of research on this problem for the period from 1956 to 2017. Differences in the histological pattern, immunohistochemical and molecular-genetic profiles, survival of patients with GA and diffuse astrocytomas GII are shown there. A clinical case of a patient with transformation of a diffuse astrocytoma in GA (GIII) and then into a secondary glioblastoma is presented.
Topics: Adult; Astrocytoma; Brain Neoplasms; ErbB Receptors; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Humans; Male; Mutation; Neoplasm Proteins
PubMed: 30059069
DOI: 10.17116/patol201880427 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Apr 2021Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain malignancy, is an exceptionally fatal cancer. Lack of suitable biomarkers and efficient treatment largely contribute to the... (Review)
Review
Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain malignancy, is an exceptionally fatal cancer. Lack of suitable biomarkers and efficient treatment largely contribute to the therapy failure. Cytoskeletal proteins are crucial proteins in glioblastoma pathogenesis and can potentially serve as biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Among them, GFAP, has gained most attention as potential diagnostic biomarker, while vimentin and microtubules are considered as prospective therapeutic targets. Microtubules represent one of the best anti-cancer targets due to their critical role in cell proliferation. Despite testing in clinical trials, the efficiency of taxanes, epothilones, vinca-domain binding drugs, colchicine-domain binding drugs and γ-tubulin binding drugs remains to be confirmed. Moreover, tumor treating field that disrupts microtubules draw attention because of its high efficiency and is called "the fourth cancer treatment modality". Thereby, because of the involvement of cytoskeleton in key physiological and pathological processes, its therapeutic potential in glioblastoma is currently extensively investigated.
Topics: Biomarkers; Cytoskeletal Proteins; Glioblastoma; Humans; Prospective Studies; Tubulin
PubMed: 33667657
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103283 -
Pediatric Blood & Cancer Aug 2017We performed a systematic review to define the long-term health problems and optimal treatment strategy for patients with neuroblastoma with intraspinal extension. Of... (Review)
Review
We performed a systematic review to define the long-term health problems and optimal treatment strategy for patients with neuroblastoma with intraspinal extension. Of 685 identified studies, 28 were included in this review. The burden of long-term health problems is high; a median of 50% of patients suffered from neurological motor deficit, 34% from sphincter dysfunction, and 30% from spinal deformity. The currently available literature remains suboptimal as a guide for treatment of NBL with intraspinal extension. More well-designed, prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment strategy.
Topics: Humans; Infant, Newborn; Neuroblastoma; Spinal Cord Compression
PubMed: 28150396
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26451 -
World Neurosurgery Jul 2018Glioblastoma (GBM) is a dismal disease managed in the first instance by surgical resection, temozolomide, and radiation. The role of repeat surgery at recurrence remains... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Glioblastoma (GBM) is a dismal disease managed in the first instance by surgical resection, temozolomide, and radiation. The role of repeat surgery at recurrence remains ill defined. This study aims to quantify the effect of repeat surgery in recurrent GBM on overall survival and determine if a trend in reported effect over time exists.
METHODS
Searches of 7 electronic databases from inception to January 2018 were conducted following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. There were 2692 articles identified for screening. Prognostic hazard ratios (HRs) derived from multivariate regression analysis were extracted and analyzed using meta-analysis of proportions and linear regression.
RESULTS
Eight observational studies reporting prognostic HRs in 10 cohorts were included. They described 1906 recurrent GBM diagnoses, managed by surgery at primary diagnosis, with 709 (37%) undergoing further repeat surgery at recurrence. Repeat surgery was shown to confer a statistically significant survival advantage compared with no surgery at recurrence in the pooled cohort (HR, 0.722; P < 0.001). Newer studies trended toward a more superior prognostic advantage of repeat surgery compared with earlier studies (effect coefficient, 0.856; P = 0.012).
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis of contemporary literature suggests that repeat surgery at GBM recurrence in select patients confers a significant, prognostic overall survival advantage independent of other prognostic factors. Furthermore, newer studies are significantly more likely to suggest greater benefit than are older studies. The main limitation is the selection bias inherent in the cohorts pooled for analysis. Larger prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to validate the findings of this study and provide stratification for such benefit justified by quality of life metrics.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Glioblastoma; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Observational Studies as Topic; Second-Look Surgery; Survival Rate
PubMed: 29654958
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.016 -
European Journal of Radiology Nov 2023Recent studies have shown promise of MR-based radiomics in predicting the survival of patients with untreated glioblastoma. This study aimed to comprehensively collate... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
Recent studies have shown promise of MR-based radiomics in predicting the survival of patients with untreated glioblastoma. This study aimed to comprehensively collate evidence to assess the prognostic value of radiomics in glioblastoma.
METHODS
PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science were searched to find original articles investigating the prognostic value of MR-based radiomics in glioblastoma published up to July 14, 2023. Concordance indexes (C-indexes) and Cox proportional hazards ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were pooled via random-effects modeling. For studies aimed at classifying long-term and short-term PFS, a hierarchical regression model was used to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the Higgin inconsistency index (I). Subgroup regression analysis was performed to find potential factors contributing to heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plots and the Egger test.
RESULTS
Among 1371 abstracts, 18 and 17 studies were included for qualitative and quantitative data synthesis, respectively. Respective pooled C-indexes and HRs for OS were 0.65 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.72) and 2.88 (95 % CI, 2.28-3.64), whereas those for PFS were 0.61 (95 % CI, 0.55-0.66) and 2.78 (95 % CI, 1.91-4.03). Among 4 studies that predicted short-term PFS, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (95 % CI, 0.58-0.89) and 0.60 (95 % CI, 0.45-0.73), respectively. There was a substantial between-study heterogeneity among studies with the survival endpoint of OS C-index (n = 9, I = 83.8 %). Publication bias was not observed overall.
CONCLUSION
Pretreatment MR-based radiomics provided modest prognostic value in both OS and PFS in patients with glioblastoma.
Topics: Humans; Prognosis; Glioblastoma; Progression-Free Survival; Proportional Hazards Models
PubMed: 37827087
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111130 -
Clinical Cancer Research : An Official... Jan 2004The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review, and where possible meta-analyses, of molecular and biological tumor markers described in neuroblastoma, and to... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review, and where possible meta-analyses, of molecular and biological tumor markers described in neuroblastoma, and to establish an evidence-based perspective on their clinical value for the screening, diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of patients.
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
A well-defined, reproducible search strategy was used to identify the relevant literature from 1966 to February 2000.
RESULTS
A total of 428 papers studying the use of 195 different tumor markers in neuroblastoma were identified. Small sample sizes, poor statistical reporting, large heterogeneity across studies (e.g., in cutoff levels), and publication bias limited meta-analysis to the area of prognosis only; MYCN, chromosome 1p, DNA index, vanillylmandelic acid:homovanillic acid ratio, CD44, Trk-A, neuron-specific enolase, lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin, and multidrug resistance were all identified as potentially important prognostic tools.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review forms a knowledge base of the tumor markers studied thus far in neuroblastoma, and has identified some of the most important prognostic markers, which should be considered in future research and treatment strategies. Importantly, the review has also highlighted some general problems across primary tumor marker studies, in particular poor and heterogeneous reporting. These need to be addressed to allow better clinical interpretation and enable more appropriate evidence-based reviews in the future. In particular, collaboration of cancer research groups is needed to enable bigger sample sizes, standardize methods of analysis and reporting, and facilitate the pooling of individual patient data.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Genetic Markers; Humans; Neoplasm Proteins; Neuroblastoma
PubMed: 14734444
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-1051-2