-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2014Symptomatic peripheral arterial disease may be treated by a number of options including exercise therapy, angioplasty, stenting and bypass surgery. Atherectomy is an... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Symptomatic peripheral arterial disease may be treated by a number of options including exercise therapy, angioplasty, stenting and bypass surgery. Atherectomy is an alternative technique where atheroma is excised by a rotating cutting blade.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to analyse randomised controlled trials comparing atherectomy against any established treatment for peripheral arterial disease in order to evaluate the effectiveness of atherectomy.
SEARCH METHODS
The Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Diseases Group Trials Search Co-ordinator searched the Specialised Register (last searched November 2013) and CENTRAL (2013, Issue 10). Trials databases were searched for details of ongoing or unpublished studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing atherectomy and other established treatments were selected for inclusion. All participants had symptomatic peripheral arterial disease with either claudication or critical limb ischaemia and evidence of lower limb arterial disease.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors (GA and CT) screened studies for inclusion, extracted data and assessed the quality of the trials. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion.
MAIN RESULTS
Four trials were included with a total of 220 participants (118 treated with atherectomy, 102 treated with balloon angioplasty) and 259 treated vessels (129 treated with atherectomy, 130 treated with balloon angioplasty). All studies compared atherectomy with angioplasty. No study was properly powered or assessors blinded to the procedures and there was a high risk of selection, attrition, detection and reporting biases.The estimated risk of success was similar between the treatment modalities although the confidence interval (CI) was compatible with small benefits of either treatment for the initial procedural success rate (Mantel-Haenszel risk ratio (RR) 0.92, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.91, P = 0.82), patency at six months (Mantel-Haenszel RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.66, P = 0.79) and patency at 12 months (Mantel-Haenszel RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.90, P = 0.53) following the procedure. The reduction in all-cause mortality with atherectomy was most likely due to an unexpectedly high mortality in the balloon angioplasty group in one of the two trials that reported mortality (Mantel-Haenszel RR 0.24, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.91, P = 0.04). Cardiovascular events were not reported in any study. There was a reduction in the rate of bailout stenting following atherectomy (Mantel-Haenszel RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.84, P = 0.01), and balloon inflation pressures were lower following atherectomy (mean difference -2.73 mmHg, 95% CI -3.48 to -1.98, P < 0.00001). Complications such as embolisation and vessel dissection were reported in two trials indicating more embolisations in the atherectomy group and more vessel dissections in the angioplasty group, but the data could not be pooled. From the limited data available, there was no clear evidence of different rates of adverse events between the atherectomy and balloon angioplasty groups for target vessel revascularisation and above-knee amputation. Quality of life and clinical and symptomatic outcomes such as walking distance or symptom relief were not reported in the studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
This review has identified poor quality evidence to support atherectomy as an alternative to balloon angioplasty in maintaining primary patency at any time interval. There was no evidence for superiority of atherectomy over angioplasty on any outcome, and distal embolisation was not reported in all trials of atherectomy. Properly powered trials are recommended.
Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon; Atherectomy; Humans; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents
PubMed: 24638972
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006680.pub2 -
The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery Feb 2015In the femoropopliteal segment, endovascular revascularization techniques have gained the role as a first line treatment strategy. Nitinol stent placement has improved... (Review)
Review
In the femoropopliteal segment, endovascular revascularization techniques have gained the role as a first line treatment strategy. Nitinol stent placement has improved the short- and mid-term primary patency rates in most lesion types and is therefore widely applied. Stenting has several shortcomings as in-stent restenosis, stent fractures and foreign material being left behind in the vessel. The concept of atherectomy is plaque debulking. This results in a potential reduction of inflation pressure requirements in angioplasty. Stent placement and consecutive in-stent restenosis may be avoided. In this non systematic literature review, the performance of different atherectomy techniques, such as direct atherectomy, orbital atherectomy, laser debulking and rotational atherectomy in the treatment of complex femoropopliteal lesions, including long lesions, moderately to heavily calcified lesions as well as occlusions and in-stent restenosis, has been analyzed.
Topics: Alloys; Atherectomy; Constriction, Pathologic; Equipment Failure; Femoral Artery; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Inguinal Canal; Lasers, Excimer; Peripheral Vascular Diseases; Popliteal Artery; Severity of Illness Index; Stents; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Calcification; Vascular Patency
PubMed: 25399550
DOI: No ID Found -
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Nov 2015What is the most safe and effective interventional treatment for coronary in-stent restenosis? (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
STUDY QUESTION
What is the most safe and effective interventional treatment for coronary in-stent restenosis?
METHODS
In a hierarchical Bayesian network meta-analysis, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and major scientific websites were screened up to 10 August 2015. Randomised controlled trials of patients with any type of coronary in-stent restenosis (either of bare metal stents or drug eluting stents; and either first or recurrent instances) were included. Trials including multiple treatments at the same time in the same group or comparing variants of the same intervention were excluded. Primary endpoints were target lesion revascularisation and late lumen loss, both at six to 12 months. The main analysis was complemented by network subanalyses, standard pairwise comparisons, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses.
STUDY ANSWER AND LIMITATIONS
Twenty four trials (4880 patients), including seven interventional treatments, were identified. Compared with plain balloons, bare metal stents, brachytherapy, rotational atherectomy, and cutting balloons, drug coated balloons and drug eluting stents were associated with a reduced risk of target lesion revascularisation and major adverse cardiac events, and with reduced late lumen loss. Treatment ranking indicated that drug eluting stents had the highest probability (61.4%) of being the most effective for target lesion vascularisation; drug coated balloons were similarly indicated as the most effective treatment for late lumen loss (probability 70.3%). The comparative efficacy of drug coated balloons and drug eluting stents was similar for target lesion revascularisation (summary odds ratio 1.10, 95% credible interval 0.59 to 2.01) and late lumen loss reduction (mean difference in minimum lumen diameter 0.04 mm, 95% credible interval -0.20 to 0.10). Risks of death, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis were comparable across all treatments, but these analyses were limited by a low number of events. Trials had heterogeneity regarding investigation periods, baseline characteristics, and endpoint reporting, with a lack of information at long term follow-up. Direct and indirect evidence was also inconsistent for the comparison between drug eluting stents and drug coated balloons.
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS
Compared with other currently available interventional treatments for coronary in-stent restenosis, drug coated balloons and drug eluting stents are associated with superior clinical and angiographic outcomes, with a similar comparative efficacy.
FUNDING, COMPETING INTERESTS, DATA SHARING
This study received no external funding. The authors declare no competing interests. No additional data available.
Topics: Bayes Theorem; Coronary Restenosis; Drug-Eluting Stents; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Myocardial Revascularization; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Stents
PubMed: 26537292
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h5392 -
Journal of Vascular and Interventional... Oct 2019Systematic literature searches using Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library for directional atherectomy with antirestenotic therapy (DAART) in femoropopliteal artery... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Systematic literature searches using Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library for directional atherectomy with antirestenotic therapy (DAART) in femoropopliteal artery disease (FPAD) from January 2003 to February 2018 were conducted to evaluate clinical safety and effectiveness. A meta-analysis was conducted using Stata software for the event rate of technical success, bailout stent placement, primary patency, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months. Five studies with 189 patients who received DAART were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled rates of technical success and bailout stent placement were 90.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 86.3%-94.6%) and 4.8% (95% CI 0.7%-8.9%), respectively. Primary patency and TLR at 12 months were 85.3% (95% CI 79.6%-91.1%) and 5.5% (95% CI 1.9%-9.1%), respectively. Meta-analysis of 3 comparative studies demonstrated that DAART was not superior in performance in clinical endpoints, including technical success, bailout stent placement, primary patency, and TLR at 12 months (relative risk [RR] 1.111, 95% CI 0.896-1.377, P = .337; RR 0.400, 95% CI 0.120-1.332, P = .135; RR 1.136, 95% CI 0.841-1.535, P = .405; and RR 0.722, 95% CI 0.291-1.789, P = .482). The data did not suggest that DAART was an improvement over paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for FPAD. The theoretical advantages of DAART still require further confirmation.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon; Atherectomy; Cardiovascular Agents; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Female; Femoral Artery; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Popliteal Artery; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Access Devices; Vascular Patency
PubMed: 31471198
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.06.012 -
BioMed Research International 2020The purpose of this article was to compare the efficiency and safety of drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) and atherectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The purpose of this article was to compare the efficiency and safety of drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) and atherectomy with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (ISR). Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (all up to March 2019) were searched systematically. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted. 5 studies with 599 participants were included. Compared with PTA, DCB significantly increased the rate of patency (6 months: RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.30 to 2.09, < 0.01; 12 months: RR 2.38, 95% CI 1.71 to 3.30, < 0.01) and the rate freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) (6 months: RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.28, < 0.01; 12 months: RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.82, < 0.01) at 6 and 12 months follow-up, and the TSA results showed these outcomes were reliable. The rate of clinical improvement by ≥1 Rutherford category in the DCB group was higher than that in the PTA group (6 months: RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.75, = 0.03; 12 months: RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.82, < 0.01) at 6 and 12 months. There is no statistically difference of ABI, all-cause mortality, and incidence of amputation between DCB group and PTA group (MD 0.03, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.08, = 0.40; RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.46 to 3.34, = 0.67; RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.01 to 7.61, = 0.48). Compared with PTA, the rate of patency and freedom from TLR in the laser atherectomy (LD) group was higher than that in the PTA group (patency: 6 months: RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.64, < 0.05, 12 months: RR 2.25, 95% CI 1.14 to 4.44, < 0.05; freedom from TLR: 6 months: RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.53, = 0.01, 12 months: RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.12 to 2.25, = 0.01) at 6 and 12 months follow-up. In conclusion, DCB and LD had superior clinical (freedom from TLR and clinical improvement) and angiographic outcomes (patency rate) compared with PTA for the treatment of femoropopliteal ISR. Moreover, DCB and LD had a low incidence of amputation and mortality and were relatively safe methods.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon; Atherectomy; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Female; Femoral Artery; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Popliteal Artery; Recurrence; Reoperation; Stents
PubMed: 32596293
DOI: 10.1155/2020/3076346 -
Vascular May 2024With the development of endovascular therapies, some studies have indicated a therapeutic potential for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization with atherectomy (AT).... (Review)
Review
The efficacy of atherectomy combined with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA)/drug-coated balloon (DCB) compared with PTA/DCB for infrapopliteal arterial diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES
With the development of endovascular therapies, some studies have indicated a therapeutic potential for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization with atherectomy (AT). This study was designed to perform a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of AT combined with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) or drug-coated balloon (DCB) compared with PTA or DCB for infrapopliteal arterial diseases.
METHODS
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched for articles published up to November 2022, reporting using atherectomy devices for infrapopliteal arterial patients. Randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies were included, and clinical characteristic outcomes were extracted and pooled. Then, we analyzed the efficacies of the AT (AT + PTA or DCB) group and the non-AT (DCB or PTA) group for infrapopliteal arterial patients.
RESULTS
We identified 6 studies with 1269 patients included in this meta-analysis. The risk ratios (RRs) of primary patency for patients treated with atherectomy group compared to non-atherectomy group at 6 months was 1.03 (95% confidence intervals (CIs) 0.86-1.23, = .74), at 12 months was 1.05 (95% CIs 0.84-1.30, = .66), in the subgroup analysis between AT combined with DCB and DCB alone, the RRs of primary patency was 1.56 (95% CIs 1.02-2.39, = .04). The RRs of freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 months was 1.04 (95% CIs 0.93-1.17, = .45), at 12 months was 1.20 (95% CIs 0.83-1.75, = .33). The RRs of mortality at 6 months was 0.57 (95% CIs 0.29-1.11, = .10), and at 12 months was 0.79 (95% CI 0.50-1.25, = .31). The RRs of limb salvage at 12 months was 0.99 (95% CIs 0.92-1.07, = .87). The standardized mean difference (SMD) of (Ankle-brachial index) ABI at 12 months was 0.16 (95% CIs 0.06-0.26, = .001).
CONCLUSIONS
According to this systematic review and meta-analysis, no significant advantages were found with the addition of atherectomy to balloon angioplasty in the below-the-knee segment. Only in the analysis of a small subgroup of atherectomy + DCB versus DCB alone was the primary patency rate at six months significantly higher when adding atherectomy. No further significant differences were found related to 12 months of primary patency, TLR, limb salvage, and mortality among groups.
PubMed: 38715518
DOI: 10.1177/17085381241252861 -
Cardiovascular Revascularization... Mar 2019Over the recent years, there has been increased interest in the use of transradial (TR) access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), including rotational... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Over the recent years, there has been increased interest in the use of transradial (TR) access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), including rotational atherectomy (RA). However, a large proportion of operators seem to be reluctant to use TR access for complex PCI including rotational atherectomy for heavily calcified coronary lesions.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Library for studies comparing radial versus femoral access in patients undergoing RA. Studies were included if they reported at least one of the following outcomes in each group separately: major adverse cardiac events (MACE), major bleeding, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction (MI), hospital length of stay, radiation exposure, procedure time, procedure success and all-cause mortality. Odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and a p-value of <0.05 was considered as a level of significance.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 5 retrospective studies with 3315 patients undergoing RA via radial access and 5838 patients via femoral access. Radial access was associated with lower major access site bleeding (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.31-0.67, p < 0.001), and radiation exposure (MD: -16.1, 95%CI: -25.4--6.7 Gy cm, p = 0.0007). There were no significant differences observed in all-cause in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.69-1.23, p = 0.58); MACE (OR: 0.80, CI: 0.63, 1.02, p = 0.08), stent thrombosis (OR: 0.28, 95%CI: 0.06-1.33 p = 0.11); and MI (OR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.15-1.24, p = 0.12). There were no significant differences in hospital stay, procedure time or procedure success between the two groups (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis of 9153 patients from observational studies demonstrates similar all-cause mortality, MACE, procedural success and procedural time during RA performed using TR access and TF access. However, TR access was associated with decreased access site bleeding and radiation exposure. Given the observational nature of these findings, a randomized controlled trial is warranted for further evidence.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atherectomy, Coronary; Catheterization, Peripheral; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Femoral Artery; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Observational Studies as Topic; Punctures; Radial Artery; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Calcification
PubMed: 30030065
DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.06.006 -
Journal of Endovascular Therapy : An... Apr 2024Infrapopliteal lesions are generally complex to treat due to small vessel diameter, long lesion length, multilevel disease, and severe calcification. Therefore,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Infrapopliteal lesions are generally complex to treat due to small vessel diameter, long lesion length, multilevel disease, and severe calcification. Therefore, different vessel preparation devices have been developed to contribute to better peri- and postprocedural outcomes. This systematic review aims to compare different vessel preparation techniques prior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) or drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty with POBA or DCB alone in infrapopliteal arterial disease.
METHODS
Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2022 assessing the value of adjunctive vessel preparation in infrapopliteal arterial disease. The primary outcomes were 12-month primary patency and limb salvage.
RESULTS
A total of 1685 patients with 1913 lesions were included in 11 POBA studies. Methodological quality was assessed as poor to moderate in these studies. Only 2 studies with 144 patients assessed vessel preparation in conjunction with DCB angioplasty. These randomized trials were assessed as high quality and found no significant benefit of adjunctive atherectomy to DCB angioplasty. The pooled Kaplan-Meier estimates of 12-month primary patency and limb salvage in the POBA studies were 67.8% and 80.9% for POBA, 62.1% and 86.4% for scoring balloons, 67.9% and 79.6% for mechanical atherectomy (MA), and 79.7% and 82.6% for laser atherectomy, respectively. Within the pooled data only scoring balloons and MA demonstrated significantly improved 12-month limb salvage compared to POBA.
CONCLUSIONS
Different forms of adjunctive vessel preparation demonstrate similar 12-month outcomes compared to POBA and DCB angioplasty alone in infrapopliteal disease, with the exception of improved 12-month limb salvage in scoring balloons and MA. However, since the included studies were heterogeneous and assessed as poor to moderate methodological quality, selection bias may have played an important role. Main conclusion is that this systematic review found no additional value of standard use of vessel preparation.
CLINICAL IMPACT
Infrapopliteal arterial disease is associated with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and generally complex to treat due to small vessel diameter, long lesion length, multilevel disease and severe calcification. A wide range of vessel preparation devices have been developed to contribute to improved peri- and postprocedural outcomes in these complex lesions. This systematic review aims to compare different vessel preparation techniques prior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) or drug coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty with POBA or DCB angioplasty alone in infrapopliteal arterial disease. Different forms of adjunctive vessel preparation demonstrate similar 12-month outcomes compared to POBA and DCB angioplasty alone in infrapopliteal disease, with the exception of improved 12-month limb salvage in scoring balloons and mechanical atherectomy (MA). However, since the included studies were heterogeneous and assessed as poor to moderate methodological quality, selection bias may have played an important role. Main conclusion is that this systematic review found no additional value of standard use of vessel preparation.
Topics: Humans; Femoral Artery; Popliteal Artery; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Angioplasty, Balloon; Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Vascular Patency
PubMed: 36062761
DOI: 10.1177/15266028221120752 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Jul 2020Our study aimed to perform a meta-analysis based on current evidence to investigate the efficacy of different debulking devices in the treatment of femoropopliteal... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Our study aimed to perform a meta-analysis based on current evidence to investigate the efficacy of different debulking devices in the treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis (FP-ISR).
METHODS
We systematically searched for articles reporting treatment of FP-ISR patients in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and retrospective studies were included, and clinical characteristic outcomes were extracted and pooled. The efficacy end points included primary patency and freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 1 year. Pooled estimates were calculated using the random effects model. For each point, effect size and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
RESULTS
We identified 12 studies with 743 patients that could be included in this meta-analysis. The overall primary patency at 1 year was 58.3% (95% CI, 44.7%-71.9%), and freedom from TLR at 1 year was 67.0% (95% CI, 60.5%-74.6%). Subgroup analysis showed that the laser debulking + percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) group was associated with a similar primary patency and freedom from TLR compared with the mechanical debulking + PTA group (53.8% vs 52.8; 65.4% vs 62.1%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that the long lesion and short lesion groups and the occlusive and stenosis groups shared similar results of primary patency and freedom from TLR. Laser + drug-coated balloon was associated with higher primary patency and freedom from TLR compared with laser + PTA (78.5% vs 58.3%; 76.7% vs 66.4%).
CONCLUSIONS
Debulking devices show promising and favorable results for FP-ISR patients with complex lesions. Debulking devices combined with a drug-coated balloon might be an efficacious way to treat FP-ISR complex lesions in the future.
Topics: Angioplasty; Atherectomy; Femoral Artery; Humans; Laser Therapy; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Popliteal Artery; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Thrombectomy; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Patency
PubMed: 32093910
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.11.058 -
International Journal of Clinical... Oct 2021Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a novel adjunct in the field of medicine. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the role of OCT in the field of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a novel adjunct in the field of medicine. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the role of OCT in the field of contemporary endovascular surgery in terms of its utility in diagnostics and interventions in peripheral arterial disease (PAD).
METHOD
A systematic search of literature published from 1st January 2009 to 1st August 2019 was identified from PubMed, Ovid and Cochrane library database with reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The pre-defined selection inclusion criteria were clinical applications of OCT in vascular surgery in relation to diagnostics and interventions. Keywords used included OCT, PAD, endovascular procedures and atherectomy.
RESULTS
From an initial search of 310 articles, 27 articles were included in this systematic review: 15 articles were related to diagnostics: peripheral arterial disease was the most studied condition (n = 8), other conditions included in-stent restenosis (n = 4), fibromuscular dysplasia (n = 2) and acute limb ischaemia (n = 1); 12 articles were related to intervention: an OCT-guided crossing catheter was the most used assisting device (n = 10), with an OCT-guided atherectomy device used in four of these studies.
CONCLUSION
Although there is currently no level 1 evidence to suggest routine use of OCT in the diagnosis and treatment of PAD, current literature suggests that the use of OCT is safe and effective. The OCT real-time vessel wall structural images clearly distinguish normal anatomy from plaque pathology, and are of great advantage both in the accurate diagnosis and treatment of target lesion, especially in reducing the amount of radiation in the endovascular procedure.
Topics: Atherectomy; Humans; Ischemia; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Plaque, Atherosclerotic; Tomography, Optical Coherence
PubMed: 34258814
DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14628