-
Particle and Fibre Toxicology Jan 2022Autoimmunity can result from the interplay between genetic background and effects of environmental and/or occupational exposure to hazardous materials. Several... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Autoimmunity can result from the interplay between genetic background and effects of environmental and/or occupational exposure to hazardous materials. Several compounds, including silica dust, have been linked with systemic autoimmunity and systemic autoimmune diseases, based on epidemiological evidence. For asbestos, a strong link with systemic autoimmune diseases does not yet exist, however, several studies have documented features of autoimmunity following asbestos exposure. Even so, human studies are limited in their ability to identify and examine isolated exposures, making it difficult to demonstrate causation or to assess pathogenic mechanisms. Therefore, this systematic review examines the existing animal evidence regarding autoimmunity and exposure to silicates (silica and asbestos).
METHODS
PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched for peer-reviewed studies examining systemic autoimmune disease-related outcomes after silicate exposure in rodents. Literature databases were searched up to September 2021 for studies written in English and where the full text was available. Search strings were established based on a PECO (Population, Exposure, Comparator, Outcome) format. After title, abstract, and full-text screening, thirty-four studies were identified for further analysis. Quality assessment through ToxR tool and qualitative analysis of the results was performed.
RESULTS
Although there was significant heterogeneity in the included studies in terms of exposure protocol and genetic background of the rodent models used, it was noted that both genetic background and exposure to silicates [(crystalline) silica and asbestos] are highly relevant to the development of (sub-) clinical systemic autoimmune disease.
CONCLUSION
Parallels were observed between the findings from the animal (this review) and human (epidemiological) studies, arguing that experimental animal models are valuable tools for examining exacerbation or development of autoimmune disease after silicate exposure. However, genetic background and synergism between exposures should be considered in future studies.
Topics: Animals; Autoimmunity; Dust; Occupational Exposure; Rodentia; Silicates
PubMed: 34996462
DOI: 10.1186/s12989-021-00439-6 -
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Jul 2022There is conflicting evidence regarding autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) association with pancreatic and non-pancreatic cancers. Literature lacks data on overall prevalence... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
There is conflicting evidence regarding autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) association with pancreatic and non-pancreatic cancers. Literature lacks data on overall prevalence of malignancies in autoimmune pancreatitis.
AIM
Given the lack of definite evidence, we aimed to pool and summarize data from available literature regarding prevalence of different malignancies in AIP.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science through February 16, 2021, to include observational studies assessing the incidence of cancer in AIP. We used the DerSimonian-Laird method with random effects for meta-analysis. Pooled prevalence, 95% confidence interval (CI), and I statistic are reported.
RESULTS
A total of 17 studies with 2746 patients were included assessing the prevalence of cancer in AIP. The overall prevalence of cancer in AIP was 9.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.7-13.5%]. The cancers with the highest prevalence in AIP population were gastric and colorectal cancer, with prevalence of 1.3% (95% CI, 0.5-2.1%) and 1.2% (95% CI, 0.6-1.8%), respectively.
CONCLUSION
We demonstrate the prevalence of different cancers in AIP. Inflammatory surge in AIP and subsequent carcinogenesis is one explanation for this association. Moreover, AIP can be a paraneoplastic syndrome manifestation of malignancies.
Topics: Autoimmune Diseases; Autoimmune Pancreatitis; Diagnosis, Differential; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Neoplasms; Pancreatitis
PubMed: 34297267
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-07179-9 -
European Journal of Gastroenterology &... Feb 2018The gold-standard treatment for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a prednisone/azathioprine combination. However, subgroups of patients may be unresponsive to this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The gold-standard treatment for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a prednisone/azathioprine combination. However, subgroups of patients may be unresponsive to this treatment. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of second-line immunosuppressive therapies for AIH through a systematic review and meta-analysis in adult patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
The systematic review was registered at the PROSPERO platform under number 42015019831. Databases MEDLINE (PubMed), Lilacs, Cochrane, and Scielo were searched. The keywords used were 'Hepatitis, Autoimmune' and descriptors terms (MeSH and DeCS). These terms were linked with each immunosuppressant of interest.
RESULTS
A total of 1532 studies were identified. Of these, 1492 were excluded on the basis of title and abstract reading. Among the 40 studies retrieved for detailed full-text analysis, a total of 15 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for the analysis. The most studied second-line immunosuppressive was mycophenolate mofetil (MM). The mean reduction of aminotransferases was observed in 94.3% with tacrolimus/prednisone, 91.3% for cyclosporine/prednisone, 85.5% for budesonide, and 78.7% MM/prednisone. For MM/prednisone, the mean rate of histological remission was 88.6%, liver transplantation was indicated in 11.4%, and the mortality rate was 7.2%. Limitations were also present, such as the lack of randomized-controlled trials and prospective studies, the small number of patients, and the heterogeneity between remission criteria.
CONCLUSION
This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the second-line imunossupressant therapy for AIH. The most studied second-line immunosuppressive is the MM, with a reasonable histological remission. The use of combined tacrolimus/prednisone was the most effective for the normalization of aminotransferases.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Cyclophosphamide; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepatitis, Autoimmune; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Mycophenolic Acid; Prednisone; Retreatment; Tacrolimus
PubMed: 29227329
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001019 -
Antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis and autoimmune disease: A systematic review of preclinical studies.Autoimmunity Reviews Sep 2022Antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis is believed to be associated with the onset and development of autoimmune diseases. To evaluate microbiota's variations triggered by... (Review)
Review
Antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis is believed to be associated with the onset and development of autoimmune diseases. To evaluate microbiota's variations triggered by antibiotic therapy and its outcomes on autoimmune diseases, preclinical studies regarding these subjects were included in this review. The studies were selected on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science from 2011 to 2021 by three researchers that extracted study data and risk of bias, which were verified by a further 3 independent researchers. The team assessed the strength of evidence across studies. Of the eligible studies, 17 showed an improvement of the studied disease after antibiotic therapy and 10 had a negative effect on the course of the condition. The ameliorating factors of the studied diseases were mostly seen when using an antibiotic cocktail. Male animals had a good outcome after therapy and, for all genders, the increase in IL-10 and Treg cells was often shown to ameliorate disease after the antibiotic intervention. Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes appeared altered after the antibiotic intervention, leading to amelioration or worsening of the condition depending on the autoimmune disease. We identified that the number of autoimmune conditions approached leads to specific conclusions regarding the interventions, making it difficult to achieve an overall conclusion. Overall, even though pre-clinical studies must be translated to the human model, the studied aspects of gender, age, lineage and disease model substantially impact the outcomes that make for many intricacies that were not-established in the study of antibiotic-induced gut dysbiosis and autoimmunity.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Autoimmune Diseases; Bacteroidetes; Dysbiosis; Female; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Humans; Male
PubMed: 35830954
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103140 -
Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology Dec 2020Activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta syndrome (APDS) is a novel primary immunodeficiency (PID) caused by heterozygous gain of function mutations in PI3Kδ catalytic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase delta syndrome (APDS) is a novel primary immunodeficiency (PID) caused by heterozygous gain of function mutations in PI3Kδ catalytic p110δ (PIK3CD) or regulatory p85α (PIK3R1) subunits leading to APDS1 and APDS2, respectively. Patients with APDS present a spectrum of clinical manifestations, particularly recurrent respiratory infections and lymphoproliferation. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for APDS patients and screened for eligibility criteria. A total of 243 APDS patients were identified from 55 articles. For all patients, demographic, clinical, immunologic, and molecular data were collected. Overall, 179 APDS1 and 64 APDS2 patients were identified. The most common clinical manifestations were respiratory tract infections (pneumonia (43.6%), otitis media (28.8%), and sinusitis (25.9%)), lymphoproliferation (70.4%), autoimmunity (28%), enteropathy (26.7%), failure to thrive (20.6%), and malignancy (12.8%). The predominant immunologic phenotype was hyper-IgM syndrome (48.1%). Immunologic profiling showed decreased B cells in 74.8% and CD4 T cells in 64.8% of APDS patients. The c.3061 G>A (p. E1021K) mutation in APDS1 with 85% frequency and c.1425+1 G> (A, C, T) (p.434-475del) mutation in APDS2 with 79% frequency were hotspot mutations. The majority of APDS patients were placed on long-term immunoglobulin replacement therapy. Immunosuppressive agents such as rituximab, tacrolimus, rapamycin, and leniolisib were also administered for autoimmunity and inflammatory complications. In addition, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was used in 12.8% of patients. APDS has heterogynous clinical manifestations. It should be suspected in patients with history of recurrent respiratory infections, lymphoproliferation, and raised IgM levels. Moreover, HSCT should be considered in patients with severe and complicated clinical manifestations with no or insufficient response to the conventional therapies.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Autoimmunity; Biomarkers; Child; Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases; Disease Susceptibility; Female; Gain of Function Mutation; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Male; Phenotype; Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases; Young Adult
PubMed: 31111319
DOI: 10.1007/s12016-019-08738-9 -
Thrombosis Research Nov 2015To investigate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA).
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies that reported odds ratio, relative risk, hazard ratio or standardized incidence ratio comparing the risk of VTE in patients with AIHA versus participants without AIHA. Pooled risk ratio and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using a random-effect, generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird.
RESULTS
Out of 592 potentially relevant articles, four studies (three cohort studies and one cross-sectional study) met our inclusion criteria and were included in the data analysis. The pooled risk ratio of VTE in patients with AIHA was 2.63 (95% CI, 1.37-5.05). The statistical heterogeneity of this study was high with an I(2) of 97%.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrated a significantly increased risk of VTE among patients with AIHA.
Topics: Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune; Humans; Incidence; Odds Ratio; Venous Thromboembolism
PubMed: 26359320
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2015.09.004 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2022Lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease that may manifest in a variety of organs and tissues including the skin, kidney, brain, heart and lung. Many patients... (Review)
Review
Lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease that may manifest in a variety of organs and tissues including the skin, kidney, brain, heart and lung. Many patients present with cutaneous lupus, where disease is often limited to the skin, but are at risk for developing systemic lupus. The objective of our present study is to perform a systematic review of studies that investigated patient cohorts and populations for the occurrence of cutaneous lupus progressing to systemic lupus. Inclusion criteria required that studies present longitudinal data of patients with limited cutaneous lupus erythematosus who were followed for development of systemic lupus erythematosus. Studies were excluded if patients had concurrent diagnosis of SLE, or if they failed to present longitudinal data. Medline and Embase were searched for English language studies using the Ovid platform. A total of 25 adult studies were identified, as well as 8 pediatric studies. The rate of cutaneous to systemic lupus progression ranged between 0% to 42% in the adult studies and 0% to 31% in the pediatric groups. The variability in these rates were due to differences in patient populations, study design, criteria used to diagnose systemic lupus, and follow-up time. Common risk factors associated with systemic lupus erythematosus development including having positive anti-nuclear antibodies, hematologic abnormalities, and higher number of lupus classification criteria at baseline. This study emphasizes the importance for providers to routinely monitor for systemic lupus in patients with cutaneous lupus.
Topics: Adult; Autoimmune Diseases; Child; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Cutaneous; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Risk Factors
PubMed: 35359921
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.866319 -
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology Feb 2022Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterised by multi-system involvement with a wide variety of manifestations. Validated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASSD) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterised by multi-system involvement with a wide variety of manifestations. Validated classification criteria are necessary to improve recognition and prevent misclassification, especially given the lack of reliable and standardised autoantibody testing. We systematically reviewed the literature to analyse proposed ASSD criteria, characteristics, and diagnostic performance.
METHODS
We searched PubMed and Embase databases (01/01/1984 to 06/11/2018) and the ACR and EULAR meeting abstracts (2017-2018). Sensitivities, specificities, positive, negative likelihood ratios and risk of bias were calculated for ASSD criteria and key variables reported in the literature. We performed meta-analysis when appropriate.
RESULTS
We retrieved 4,358 studies. We found 85 proposed ASSD criteria from a total of 82 studies. All but one study included anti-synthetase autoantibody (ARS) positivity in the ASSD criteria. Most studies required only one ASSD feature plus anti-ARS to define ASSD (n=64, 78%), whereas 16 studies required more than one ASSD variable plus anti-ARS. The only criteria not including anti-ARS positivity required 5 ASSD clinical features. We found limited data and wide variability in the diagnostic performance of each variable and definition proposed in the literature. Given these limitations we only meta-analysed the performance of individual muscle biopsy and clinical variables in diagnosing ASSD, which performed poorly.
CONCLUSIONS
The current ASSD criteria include a variety of serological, clinical, and histological features with wide variability amongst proposed definitions and the performance of these definitions has not been tested. This systematic literature review suggests the need for additional data and consensus-driven classification criteria for ASSD.
Topics: Autoantibodies; Humans; Ligases; Syndrome
PubMed: 35225224
DOI: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/8xj0b9 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine Oct 2021Several studies have linked apical periodontitis and systemic diseases. The aim of this study is to present a systematic review of the available literature investigating... (Review)
Review
Several studies have linked apical periodontitis and systemic diseases. The aim of this study is to present a systematic review of the available literature investigating whether there is an association between pulpal-periapical pathology and autoimmune disease. The review was conducted following the PRISMA statement. A literature search was performed in five databases. Studies involving patients with pulpal-periapical pathology and autoimmune diseases were included in the review. Based on the PICO model, the research question aimed to assess whether there is an increased risk of developing pulpal-periapical pathology in patients with autoimmune disease. Article selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed using an adapted version of the STROBE guidelines. A total of seven studies were included in our review. The types of articles were five case-control and two cross-sectional studies. Periapical pathologies were associated to three autoimmune diseases (diabetes mellitus I, rheumatoid arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease). Among the included studies, four show a low risk of bias, while three present a moderate risk. There could be an association between apical periodontitis and autoimmune diseases, although most studies report statistically non-significant associations.
PubMed: 34768405
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214886 -
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology... Oct 2019This mini-review offers an update on the rare autoimmune polyendocrinopathy (AP) syndrome with a synopsis of recent developments.
CONTEXT
This mini-review offers an update on the rare autoimmune polyendocrinopathy (AP) syndrome with a synopsis of recent developments.
DESIGN AND RESULTS
Systematic search for studies related to pathogenesis, immunogenetics, screening, diagnosis, clinical spectrum, and epidemiology of AP. AP (orphan code ORPHA 282196) is defined as the autoimmune-induced failure of at least two glands. AP is divided into the rare juvenile type I and the adult types II to IV. The prevalence is 1:100,000 and 1:20,000 for types I and types II to IV, respectively. Whereas type I (ORPHA 3453) is a monogenetic syndrome with an autosomal recessive transmission related to mutations in the autoimmune regulator (AIRE) gene, types II to IV are genetically complex multifactorial syndromes that are strongly associated with certain alleles of HLA genes within the major histocompatibility complex located on chromosome 6, as well as the cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 and the protein tyrosine phosphatase nonreceptor type 22 genes. Addison disease is the major endocrine component of type II (ORPHA 3143), whereas the coexistence of type 1 diabetes and autoimmune thyroid disease is characteristic for type III (ORPHA 227982). Genetic screening for the AIRE gene is useful in patients with suspected type I, whereas serological screening (i.e., diabetes/adrenal antibodies) is required in patients with monoglandular autoimmunity and suspected AP. If positive, functional endocrine testing of the antibody-positive patients as well as serological screening of their first-degree relatives is recommended.
CONCLUSION
Timely diagnosis, genetic counseling, and optimal long-term management of AP is best offered in specialized centers.
Topics: Adult; Autoimmunity; Child; Comorbidity; Genetic Counseling; Genetic Testing; Humans; Long-Term Care; Polyendocrinopathies, Autoimmune; Prevalence
PubMed: 31127843
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2019-00602