-
International Journal of Environmental... Jul 2019Increasing pressure on limited healthcare resources has necessitated the development of measures promoting early discharge and avoiding inappropriate hospital...
Increasing pressure on limited healthcare resources has necessitated the development of measures promoting early discharge and avoiding inappropriate hospital (re)admission. This systematic review examines the evidence for interventions in acute hospitals including (i) hospital-patient discharge to home, community services or other settings, (ii) hospital discharge to another care setting, and (iii) reduction or prevention of inappropriate hospital (re)admissions. Academic electronic databases were searched from 2005 to 2018. In total, ninety-four eligible papers were included. Interventions were categorized into: (1) pre-discharge exclusively delivered in the acute care hospital, (2) pre- and post-discharge delivered by acute care hospital, (3) post-discharge delivered at home and (4) delivered only in a post-acute facility. Mixed results were found regarding the effectiveness of many types of interventions. Interventions exclusively delivered in the acute hospital pre-discharge and those involving education were most common but their effectiveness was limited in avoiding (re)admission. Successful pre- and post-discharge interventions focused on multidisciplinary approaches. Post-discharge interventions exclusively delivered at home reduced hospital stay and contributed to patient satisfaction. Existing systematic reviews on tele-health and long-term care interventions suggest insufficient evidence for admission avoidance. The most effective interventions to avoid inappropriate re-admission to hospital and promote early discharge included integrated systems between hospital and the community care, multidisciplinary service provision, individualization of services, discharge planning initiated in hospital and specialist follow-up.
Topics: Delivery of Health Care; Humans; Patient Discharge; Patient Readmission
PubMed: 31295933
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16142457 -
AIMS Public Health 2015This review addresses the issue of health care avoidance and obesity. English language journal articles published between 1990 and 2012 that addressed the review... (Review)
Review
This review addresses the issue of health care avoidance and obesity. English language journal articles published between 1990 and 2012 that addressed the review question; "is being overweight or obese an unrecognized factor in healthcare avoidance?" were located using major databases. A modified JADAD scoring system was then used to assess papers. Ten papers were identified which directly addressed the review question. A positive relationship exists between obesity and healthcare avoidance. The major contributory factors were being female, have a diagnosed mental health problem and perceived or actual bias and discrimination by health professionals. The review also highlights the importance of the relationship between healthcare professionals and their patients, and the physical environment in which interactions occur as these may contribute to avoidance behaviors. Concern about obesity is rising and while there has been much discussion about strategies to reduce obesity this review highlights the need for thinking more broadly about the way in which overweight and obese individuals interact with preventative health strategies.
PubMed: 29546095
DOI: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.1.56 -
Appetite Jun 2019A systematic review identifying the use of cyproheptadine (CY) as an appetite stimulant was completed.
OBJECTIVE
A systematic review identifying the use of cyproheptadine (CY) as an appetite stimulant was completed.
METHOD
Studies of any design exploring the efficacy of CY as an appetite stimulant in all age groups and populations were included. Primary outcomes of studies included were weight gain, appetite stimulation, and/or caloric/nutritional intake increase. The review was completed in accordance with PRISMA standards.
RESULTS
A total of 46 articles across 21 different treatment populations met criteria for the review, including 32 randomized controlled trials, 4 prospective cohort studies, 4 retrospective cohort studies, 4 case reports and 2 case series. Of these, 39 demonstrated that CY resulted in significant weight gain in the sample under study. Studies exploring the use of CY in those with malignant/progressive disease states, such as HIV and cancer, showed minimal to no benefit of the medication. Transient mild to moderate sedation was the most commonly reported side effect. Studies included were heterogeneous in terms of methods as well as study patient demographics, characteristics and concurrent medical conditions. Few studies provided objective measures of appetite change.
DISCUSSION
CY appears to be a safe, generally well-tolerated medication that has utility in helping facilitate weight gain in patients drawn from a variety of underweight populations. Future prospective randomized controlled studies in low weight patients that include objective measures of appetite and intake are needed to better understand the mechanism by which CY augments weight gain.
Topics: Anorexia Nervosa; Appetite; Appetite Stimulants; Cyproheptadine; Humans; Malnutrition; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thinness; Weight Gain
PubMed: 30825493
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.02.012 -
Behavioural Brain Research Aug 2023In clinical research, aberrant avoidance behavior and inhibitory control deficit have a high comorbidity in different psychopathological disorders. Therefore, avoidance... (Review)
Review
In clinical research, aberrant avoidance behavior and inhibitory control deficit have a high comorbidity in different psychopathological disorders. Therefore, avoidance and impulsive and/or compulsive behaviors might be classified as transdiagnostic traits, where the assessment through animal models could address evidence of their contribution as neurobehavioral mechanisms in psychopathology. The objective of the present review has been to assess the avoidance trait and the implication of inhibitory control behaviors, through studies using passive and active avoidance tests in rodents, and a preclinical model using selective breeding of high- or low-avoidance Roman rats (RHA, RLA). A systematic search strategy was carried out in the PubMed and Web of Science databases, where a total of 40 studies were accepted in the qualitative synthesis. The results of the different studies reviewed pointed to a relation between a reduced avoidance profile in passive avoidance (PA) with impulsive decision making and novelty-seeking behaviors; an increased avoidance profile in PA with compulsive drinking; a high active avoidance profile, including RHA rats, with different types of impulsivity and novelty- seeking behaviors; and regarding compulsivity depending on its measure, a low active avoidance profile, including RLA rats, has been associated with increased anxiety in the EPM and increased grooming, while a high active avoidance profile, including RHA rats, has been associated with increased rearing, compulsive drinking including alcohol, and cognitive inflexibility. The results have been discussed in terms of environmental factors and the underlying mechanisms between these possible transdiagnostic traits in psychopathology.
Topics: Rats; Animals; Avoidance Learning; Exploratory Behavior; Models, Animal; Phenotype; Ethanol; Behavior, Animal
PubMed: 37207979
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2023.114500 -
Eating and Weight Disorders : EWD Oct 2022Meat avoidance has long been thought to be related to eating psychopathology; however, research does not necessarily support this notion. Furthermore, commonly used... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Meat avoidance has long been thought to be related to eating psychopathology; however, research does not necessarily support this notion. Furthermore, commonly used eating disorder scales may be picking up on normal meat-avoiding behaviours in vegetarians and vegans. As such, we systematically reviewed the association between vegetarianism, veganism, and disordered eating, and reviewed the psychometric properties of eating disorder scales for use in these populations.
METHODS
We searched electronic databases MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL for literature published until June 2021.
RESULTS
Forty-eight studies met eligibility criteria, with no consensus as to whether meat avoidance was associated with higher rates of disordered eating. Most studies reported a significant positive association with both vegetarianism and veganism, and orthorexia nervosa. Six studies provided evidence for the use of eating disorder measures in vegetarians and vegans, reporting poor psychometric fit among all scales.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review highlights the extent to which vegetarians and vegans have been highly understudied, with limited research suggesting higher levels of orthorexia nervosa behaviours in vegetarians and vegans. Furthermore, our results provide tentative evidence that the factorial validity of commonly used eating disorder scales, such as the EDE-Q, may be poor in vegans.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level I, systematic review.
Topics: Diet, Vegan; Feeding and Eating Disorders; Humans; Meat; Vegans; Vegetarians
PubMed: 35729472
DOI: 10.1007/s40519-022-01428-0 -
JAMA Jan 2020The tort liability system is intended to serve 3 functions: compensate patients who sustain injury from negligence, provide corrective justice, and deter negligence....
IMPORTANCE
The tort liability system is intended to serve 3 functions: compensate patients who sustain injury from negligence, provide corrective justice, and deter negligence. Deterrence, in theory, occurs because clinicians know that they may experience adverse consequences if they negligently injure patients.
OBJECTIVE
To review empirical findings regarding the association between malpractice liability risk (ie, the extent to which clinicians face the threat of being sued and having to pay damages) and health care quality and safety.
DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION
Systematic search of multiple databases for studies published between January 1, 1990, and November 25, 2019, examining the relationship between malpractice liability risk measures and health outcomes or structural and process indicators of health care quality.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Information on the exposure and outcome measures, results, and acknowledged limitations was extracted by 2 reviewers. Meta-analytic pooling was not possible due to variations in study designs; therefore, studies were summarized descriptively and assessed qualitatively.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Associations between malpractice risk measures and health care quality and safety outcomes. Exposure measures included physicians' malpractice insurance premiums, state tort reforms, frequency of paid claims, average claim payment, physicians' claims history, total malpractice payments, jury awards, the presence of an immunity from malpractice liability, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Medicare malpractice geographic practice cost index, and composite measures combining these measures. Outcome measures included patient mortality; hospital readmissions, avoidable admissions, and prolonged length of stay; receipt of cancer screening; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality patient safety indicators and other measures of adverse events; measures of hospital and nursing home quality; and patient satisfaction.
RESULTS
Thirty-seven studies were included; 28 examined hospital care only and 16 focused on obstetrical care. Among obstetrical care studies, 9 found no significant association between liability risk and outcomes (such as Apgar score and birth injuries) and 7 found limited evidence for an association. Among 20 studies of patient mortality in nonobstetrical care settings, 15 found no evidence of an association with liability risk and 5 found limited evidence. Among 7 studies that examined hospital readmissions and avoidable initial hospitalizations, none found evidence of an association between liability risk and outcomes. Among 12 studies of other measures (eg, patient safety indicators, process-of-care quality measures, patient satisfaction), 7 found no association between liability risk and these outcomes and 5 identified significant associations in some analyses.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this systematic review, most studies found no association between measures of malpractice liability risk and health care quality and outcomes. Although gaps in the evidence remain, the available findings suggested that greater tort liability, at least in its current form, was not associated with improved quality of care.
Topics: Humans; Insurance, Liability; Liability, Legal; Malpractice; Obstetrics; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Postoperative Complications; Quality of Health Care
PubMed: 31990319
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.21411 -
Journal of Neuro-oncology Jul 2023We systematically reviewed the current landscape of hippocampal-avoidance radiotherapy, focusing specifically on rates of hippocampal tumor recurrence and changes in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
We systematically reviewed the current landscape of hippocampal-avoidance radiotherapy, focusing specifically on rates of hippocampal tumor recurrence and changes in neurocognitive function.
METHODS
PubMed was queried for studies involving hippocampal-avoidance radiation therapy and results were screened using PRISMA guidelines. Results were analyzed for median overall survival, progression-free survival, hippocampal relapse rates, and neurocognitive function testing.
RESULTS
Of 3709 search results, 19 articles were included and a total of 1611 patients analyzed. Of these studies, 7 were randomized controlled trials, 4 prospective cohort studies, and 8 retrospective cohort studies. All studies evaluated hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiation treatment (WBRT) and/or prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with brain metastases. Hippocampal relapse rates were low (overall effect size = 0.04; 95% confidence interval [0.03, 0.05]) and there was no significant difference in risk of relapse between the five studies that compared HA-WBRT/HA-PCI and WBRT/PCI groups (risk difference = 0.01; 95% confidence interval [- 0.02, 0.03]; p = 0.63). 11 out of 19 studies included neurocognitive function testing. Significant differences were reported in overall cognitive function and memory and verbal learning 3-24 months post-RT. Differences in executive function were reported by one study, Brown et al., at 4 months. No studies reported differences in verbal fluency, visual learning, concentration, processing speed, and psychomotor speed at any timepoint.
CONCLUSION
Current studies in HA-WBRT/HA-PCI showed low hippocampal relapse or metastasis rates. Significant differences in neurocognitive testing were most prominent in overall cognitive function, memory, and verbal learning. Studies were hampered by loss to follow-up.
Topics: Humans; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Cranial Irradiation; Brain Neoplasms; Hippocampus
PubMed: 37395975
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04384-6 -
Physiotherapy Sep 2022Studies consistently suggest that work as a physical therapist is associated with burnout, yet no review of the contributing factors has been conducted. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Studies consistently suggest that work as a physical therapist is associated with burnout, yet no review of the contributing factors has been conducted.
OBJECTIVE
To identify and examine the risk factors associated with physical therapist burnout.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 2020.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Quantitative studies of physical therapists in clinical practice who experience burnout symptoms or syndrome.
DATA EXTRACTION AND DATA SYNTHESIS
Risk factors such as characteristics of the participant, environment, structures, and experiences that demonstrate a significant predisposition to burnout were extracted. The modified Downs and Black checklist was used to identify risk of bias.
RESULTS
Forty-six studies (8717 participants) were included. The risk of bias assessment determined all were of fair or poor quality. Fifty-three risk factors were identified, with four being classified as unavoidable and forty-nine determined as avoidable. The avoidable risk factors were further categorized as either structural/organizational (32%), psychological/emotional (19%), environmental (19%), or sociodemographic (13%).
LIMITATIONS
A risk factor's importance may not correlate with its prevalence, and the low-quality studies limit the ability to make definitive conclusions.
CONCLUSION
A significant amount of literature has identified a wide variety of risk factors. The majority are avoidable, and the effect and degree to which each risk factor contributes to burnout varies. The identified risk factors can help develop targeted prevention and intervention strategies for the benefit of physical therapists, organizations, and policymakers.
FUNDING
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER
PROSPERO CRD42020136356.
Topics: Burnout, Professional; Humans; Physical Therapists; Qualitative Research; Risk Factors
PubMed: 35569408
DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2022.01.005 -
The Journal of Pain Oct 2017Activity pacing is ubiquitous in chronic pain management and aims to reduce pain-contingent avoidance of activity to improve functioning. A meta-analysis, however, has... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
UNLABELLED
Activity pacing is ubiquitous in chronic pain management and aims to reduce pain-contingent avoidance of activity to improve functioning. A meta-analysis, however, has linked pacing with higher levels of pain and disability. One potential explanation is an overlap between existing measures of pacing and avoidance, leading to links with poorer outcomes that are typically associated with avoidance. This study systematically reviews the evidence regarding the relationship between measures of pacing and avoidance. A search was conducted for studies measuring both constructs in adults with chronic pain. A meta-analysis of correlations between pacing and avoidance was conducted; 16 studies were included and a small positive correlation was found (r = .290, P < .001) overall. Single-item and multiple-item measures were also compared; a moderate positive correlation was found for multiple-item measures (r = .410, P < .001), which differed significantly from a small positive correlation found for single-item measures (r = .105, P < .001). Due to limited studies, independent analyses of individual subscales were not possible. Existing measures of pacing-particularly multiple-item measures-may partially confound pacing with avoidance. Further research is required to ensure that a reliable measure of pacing that distinguishes this construct from avoidance is available to adequately evaluate pacing instruction and the effect of pacing on key outcomes in chronic pain.
PERSPECTIVE
This meta-analysis examines the correlation between pacing and avoidance in adults with chronic pain. Results indicate that existing measures may partially confound pacing with avoidance. Directions for future research are proposed to ensure that an adequate measure of pacing exists to evaluate its effect on key outcomes in chronic pain.
Topics: Avoidance Learning; Chronic Pain; Humans; Motor Activity
PubMed: 28479209
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.04.008 -
The Journal of Headache and Pain Aug 2023Headache is one of the most common neurological symptoms. Many previous studies have indicated a relationship between primary headaches and alcohol. Drinking has been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Headache is one of the most common neurological symptoms. Many previous studies have indicated a relationship between primary headaches and alcohol. Drinking has been associated with increased risk of tension-type headache (TTH) and migraine. However, recently published studies have not confirmed this relationship. The existing literature is inconclusive; however, migraine patients avoid alcohol. Therefore, the primary objective was to provide a reliable assessment of alcohol intake in people with primary headaches; the secondary objective was to identify any potential relationship between alcohol consumption and headache risk.
METHODS
This study was based on PubMed, Embase and Web of Science database searches performed on 11 July 2023. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023412926). Risk of bias for the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Meta-analyses were performed using Statistica software. The Risk Ratio (RR) was adopted as the measure of the final effect. Analyses were based on a dichotomous division of the respondents into "non-drinkers" and "drinkers" for headache patients and matched non-headache groups.
RESULTS
From a total of 1892 articles, 22 were included in the meta-analysis. The majority demonstrated a moderate or high risk of bias. The first part of the meta-analysis was performed on data obtained from 19 migraine studies with 126 173 participants. The risk of migraine in alcohol drinkers is approximately 1.5 times lower than in the group of non-drinkers (RR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.57-0.89). The second part involved 9 TTH studies with 28 715 participants. No relationship was found between TTH diagnosis and alcohol consumption (RR = 1.09; 95% CI: 0.93-1.27). Two of the included cluster-headache articles had inconclusive results.
CONCLUSIONS
Alcohol consumption and migraine are inversely correlated. The exact mechanism behind this observation may indicate that migraine leads to alcohol-avoidance, rather than alcohol having any protective role against migraine. There was no relationship between TTH and drinking. However, further studies related to primary headaches and alcohol consumption with low risk of bias are required. Additionally, patients and physicians should consider the latest medical data, in order to avoid the myths about alcohol consumption and primary headaches.
Topics: Humans; Ethanol; Headache; Migraine Disorders; Tension-Type Headache; Cluster Headache
PubMed: 37612595
DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01653-7