-
Supportive Care in Cancer : Official... Apr 2023The axillary web syndrome (AWS) is a surgical breast cancer sequel that limits the functionality of the patient and delays the protocol times of application of cancer... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The axillary web syndrome (AWS) is a surgical breast cancer sequel that limits the functionality of the patient and delays the protocol times of application of cancer treatments. This implies a long period of discomfort and limitations for the user.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the different physiotherapy treatments for the AWS and how effective they are.
METHODS
A systematic review based on PRISMA protocol and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021281354) was conducted. The research was performed using PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PEDro, and Web of Science databases during January 2022 and March 2022. All randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials were included in this review.
RESULTS
A total of 188 articles were identified, with 9 studies selected for the systematic review. These studies basically propose treatments based on exercises and stretching, manual therapy, and the combination of manual therapy and exercises.
CONCLUSIONS
Exercise and stretching are the most effective therapies within the field of physiotherapy for the rehabilitation of axillary web syndrome. They restore range of motion faster, reduce pain, improve quality of life, and reduce disabilities. Manual therapy, scar massage, and myofascial release could help improve outcomes but with worse results. The meta-analysis conclusion is that pain is the only outcome with a significant reduction after the application of physiotherapy treatments - 0.82 [- 1.67; 0.03]. This conclusion is drawn from the only three studies with small sample sizes.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Physical Therapy Modalities; Exercise Therapy; Musculoskeletal Manipulations; Pain
PubMed: 37043039
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07666-x -
JAMA Oncology Apr 2022Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is a frequently recurring malignant neoplasm with metastatic potential that presents in older adults on the genital, perianal, and...
IMPORTANCE
Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is a frequently recurring malignant neoplasm with metastatic potential that presents in older adults on the genital, perianal, and axillary skin. Extramammary Paget disease can precede or occur along with internal malignant neoplasms.
OBJECTIVE
To develop recommendations for the care of adults with EMPD.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
A systematic review of the literature on EMPD from January 1990 to September 18, 2019, was conducted using MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Libraries. Analysis included 483 studies. A multidisciplinary expert panel evaluation of the findings led to the development of clinical care recommendations for EMPD.
FINDINGS
The key findings were as follows: (1) Multiple skin biopsies, including those of any nodular areas, are critical for diagnosis. (2) Malignant neoplasm screening appropriate for age and anatomical site should be performed at baseline to distinguish between primary and secondary EMPD. (3) Routine use of sentinel lymph node biopsy or lymph node dissection is not recommended. (4) For intraepidermal EMPD, surgical and nonsurgical treatments may be used depending on patient and tumor characteristics, although cure rates may be superior with surgical approaches. For invasive EMPD, surgical resection with curative intent is preferred. (5) Patients with unresectable intraepidermal EMPD or patients who are medically unable to undergo surgery may receive nonsurgical treatments, including radiotherapy, imiquimod, photodynamic therapy, carbon dioxide laser therapy, or other modalities. (6) Distant metastatic disease may be treated with chemotherapy or individualized targeted approaches. (7) Close follow-up to monitor for recurrence is recommended for at least the first 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Clinical practice guidelines for EMPD provide guidance regarding recommended diagnostic approaches, differentiation between invasive and noninvasive disease, and use of surgical vs nonsurgical treatments. Prospective registries may further improve our understanding of the natural history of the disease in primary vs secondary EMPD, clarify features of high-risk tumors, and identify superior management approaches.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Imiquimod; Paget Disease, Extramammary; Prospective Studies; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 35050310
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.7148 -
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... Mar 2022The call to integrate prospective surveillance for lymphedema into cancer care pathways is building momentum to enable early intervention and prevent the progression of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The call to integrate prospective surveillance for lymphedema into cancer care pathways is building momentum to enable early intervention and prevent the progression of the condition. We offer a critical evaluation of the literature on prospective surveillance and early management for cancer-related lymphedema and evaluate the effect of such programs in preventing chronic lymphedema (CRD42019137965).
METHODS
Five databases and two registries were searched for randomized controlled trials or observational studies that assessed the incidence or prevalence of lymphedema associated with participation in a prospective surveillance program, published until February 26, 2021. Numbers triggered for early lymphedema management, resolved, and chronic lymphedema were extracted. Pooled relative risk (trials) and pooled rate (cumulative incidence; observational studies) of chronic lymphedema was calculated. Subgroup analyses assessed the effect of study design, length of follow-up, and extent of axillary surgery.
RESULTS
Twenty-three studies were included, of which 21 studies evaluated breast cancer-related arm lymphedema (BCRaL). Participation in prospective surveillance with early management reduced the risk of chronic BCRaL versus usual care (relative risk 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.95; two randomized controlled trials; N = 106). The pooled rate of chronic BCRaL was 4% (95% CI, 3 to 6; 15 observational studies; N = 3,545), and 6% (95% CI, 4 to 9) when restricted to participants with axillary lymph node dissection (12 studies; N = 1,527).
CONCLUSION
The findings suggest that participation in prospective surveillance with early management reduces the risk of chronic BCRaL. Only a minority of patients at high risk of lymphedema because of axillary surgery developed chronic lymphedema. More robust research is needed to determine whether prospective surveillance with early management can reduce the risk of chronic lymphedema, particularly among cancer survivors other than breast cancer.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Cancer Lymphedema; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphedema; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 35077194
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.21.01681 -
The Lancet. Oncology May 2013The body of evidence related to breast-cancer-related lymphoedema incidence and risk factors has substantially grown and improved in quality over the past decade. We... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The body of evidence related to breast-cancer-related lymphoedema incidence and risk factors has substantially grown and improved in quality over the past decade. We assessed the incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer and explored the evidence available for lymphoedema risk factors.
METHODS
We searched Academic Search Elite, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (clinical trials), and Medline for research articles that assessed the incidence or prevalence of, or risk factors for, arm lymphoedema after breast cancer, published between Jan 1, 2000, and June 30, 2012. We extracted incidence data and calculated corresponding exact binomial 95% CIs. We used random effects models to calculate a pooled overall estimate of lymphoedema incidence, with subgroup analyses to assess the effect of different study designs, countries of study origin, diagnostic methods, time since diagnosis, and extent of axillary surgery. We assessed risk factors and collated them into four levels of evidence, depending on consistency of findings and quality and quantity of studies contributing to findings.
FINDINGS
72 studies met the inclusion criteria for the assessment of lymphoedema incidence, giving a pooled estimate of 16.6% (95% CI 13.6-20.2). Our estimate was 21.4% (14.9-29.8) when restricted to data from prospective cohort studies (30 studies). The incidence of arm lymphoedema seemed to increase up to 2 years after diagnosis or surgery of breast cancer (24 studies with time since diagnosis or surgery of 12 to <24 months; 18.9%, 14.2-24.7), was highest when assessed by more than one diagnostic method (nine studies; 28.2%, 11.8-53.5), and was about four times higher in women who had an axillary-lymph-node dissection (18 studies; 19.9%, 13.5-28.2) than it was in those who had sentinel-node biopsy (18 studies; 5.6%, 6.1-7.9). 29 studies met the inclusion criteria for the assessment of risk factors. Risk factors that had a strong level of evidence were extensive surgery (ie, axillary-lymph-node dissection, greater number of lymph nodes dissected, mastectomy) and being overweight or obese.
INTERPRETATION
Our findings suggest that more than one in five women who survive breast cancer will develop arm lymphoedema. A clear need exists for improved understanding of contributing risk factors, as well as of prevention and management strategies to reduce the individual and public health burden of this disabling and distressing disorder.
FUNDING
The National Breast Cancer Foundation, Australia.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Incidence; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphedema; Mastectomy; Odds Ratio; Overweight; Prevalence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Upper Extremity
PubMed: 23540561
DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70076-7 -
Breast Disease 2015Various methods are currently used during axillary lymphadenectomy. Our systematic review aims to investigate the potential benefits of bipolar vessel sealing systems... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Various methods are currently used during axillary lymphadenectomy. Our systematic review aims to investigate the potential benefits of bipolar vessel sealing systems (EBVS) over conventional suture ligation during the axillary dissection of breast cancer patients.
METHODS
We searched Medline (1966-2014), Scopus (2004-2014), Popline (1973-2014) Cochrane CENTRAL (1999-2014) and ClinicalTrials.gov (2000-2014) together with reference lists from included studies Statistical meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan 5.1 software.
RESULTS
Four studies were finally included, involving 352 patients. Usage of EBVS significantly increased the number of retrieved axillary lymph nodes (MD 1.67 nodes, 95% CI 0.21, 3.13). Intraoperative times were not affected by these new technique, when compared to traditional suture ligation (MD -10.82 minutes, 95% CI -23.27, 2.70). Neither the volume of postoperative axillary drainage (MD -38.47 ml, 95% CI -110.26, 32.59) nor the duration of drainage (MD -0.49 days, 95% CI -1.23, 0.25) were significantly affected by EBVS application. We observed, however, that bipolar systems may be associated with an increased risk of postoperative seroma formation (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.13, 3.70).
CONCLUSION
Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing systems seem to increase the accuracy of axillary dissection and are equally safe compared to conventional suture ligation regarding intraoperative and postoperative blood loss. They are associated, however, with and increased incidence of seroma formation. Further randomized trials are needed in the field in order to obtain firm conclusions.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Neoplasms; Electrosurgery; Female; Hemostasis, Surgical; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Mastectomy
PubMed: 25159187
DOI: 10.3233/BD-140383 -
Cancers Apr 2021use of fibrin sealants following pelvic, paraaortic, and inguinal lymphadenectomy may reduce lymphatic morbidity. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate if this... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
use of fibrin sealants following pelvic, paraaortic, and inguinal lymphadenectomy may reduce lymphatic morbidity. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate if this finding applies to the axillary lymphadenectomy.
METHODS
randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of fibrin sealants in reducing axillary lymphatic complications were included. Lymphocele, drainage output, surgical-site complications, and hospital stay were considered as outcomes.
RESULTS
twenty-three randomized studies, including patients undergoing axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer, melanoma, and Hodgkin's disease, were included. Fibrin sealants did not affect axillary lymphocele incidence nor the surgical site complications. Drainage output, days with drainage, and hospital stay were reduced when fibrin sealants were applied ( < 0.0001, < 0.005, = 0.008).
CONCLUSION
fibrin sealants after axillary dissection reduce the total axillary drainage output, the duration of drainage, and the hospital stay. No effects on the incidence of postoperative lymphocele and surgical site complications rate are found.
PubMed: 33923153
DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092056 -
Scientific Reports Jun 2022Seroma or lymphocele remains the most common complication after mastectomy and lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Many different techniques are available to prevent this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Seroma or lymphocele remains the most common complication after mastectomy and lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Many different techniques are available to prevent this complication: wound drainage, reduction of the dead space by flap fixation, use of various types of energy, external compression dressings, shoulder immobilization or physical activity, as well as numerous drugs and glues. We searched MEDLINE, clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for publications addressing the issue of prevention of lymphocele or seroma after mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy. Quality was assessed using Hawker's quality assessment tool. Incidence of seroma or lymphocele were collected. Fifteen randomized controlled trials including a total of 1766 patients undergoing radical mastectomy and axillary lymphadenectomy for breast cancer were retrieved. The incidence of lymphocele or seroma in the study population was 24.2% (411/1698): 25.2% (232/920) in the test groups and 23.0% (179/778) in the control groups. Neither modification of surgical technique (RR 0.86; 95% CI [0.72, 1.03]) nor application of a medical treatment (RR 0.96; 95% CI [0.72, 1.29]) was effective in preventing lymphocele. On the contrary, decreasing the drainage time increased the risk of lymphocele (RR 1.88; 95% CI [1.43, 2.48). There was no publication bias but the studies were of medium to low quality. To conclude, despite the heterogeneity of study designs, drainage appears to be the most effective technique, although the overall quality of the data is low.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphocele; Mastectomy; Postoperative Complications; Seroma
PubMed: 35705655
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13831-9 -
Annals of Surgery Apr 2023To evaluate the impact of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) on upper limb (UL) morbidity in breast cancer patients. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the impact of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) on upper limb (UL) morbidity in breast cancer patients.
BACKGROUND
Axillary de-escalation is motivated by a desire to reduce harm of ALND. Understanding the impact of axillary surgery and disparities in operative procedures on postoperative arm morbidity would better direct resources to the point of need and cement the need for de-escalation strategies.
METHODS
Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsychINFO were searched from 1990 until March 2020. Included studies were randomized-controlled and observational studies focusing on UL morbidities, in breast surgery patients. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The prevalence of UL morbidity comparing SLNB and ALND at <12 months, 12 to 24 months, and beyond 24 months were analyzed.
RESULTS
Sixty-seven studies were included. All studies reported a higher rate of lymphedema and pain after ALND compared with SLNB. The difference in lymphedema and pain prevalence between SLNB and ALND was 13.7% (95% confidence interval: 10.5-16.8, P <0.005) and 24.2% (95% confidence interval: 12.1-36.3, P <0.005), respectively. Pooled estimates for prevalence of reduced strength and range of motion after SLNB and ALND were 15.2% versus 30.9% and 17.1% versus 29.8%, respectively. Type of axillary surgery, greater body mass index, and radiotherapy were some of the predictors for UL morbidities.
CONCLUSIONS
Prevalence of lymphedema after ALND was higher than previously estimated. ALND patients experienced greater rates of lymphedema, pain, reduced strength, and range of motion compared with SLNB. The findings support the continued drive to de-escalate axillary surgery.
Topics: Humans; Female; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; Breast Neoplasms; Lymph Node Excision; Morbidity; Lymphedema; Axilla; Pain; Lymph Nodes; Sentinel Lymph Node; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 35946806
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005671 -
BMC Surgery Jul 2023This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to study the evidence on the efficacy and safety of omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Efficacy and safety comparison between axillary lymph node dissection with no axillary surgery in patients with sentinel node-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to study the evidence on the efficacy and safety of omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with clinically node-negative but sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive breast cancer using all the available evidence.
METHODS
The Embase, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through February 25, 2023. Original trials that compared only the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with ALND as the control group for patients with clinically node-negative but SLN-positive breast cancer were included. The primary outcomes were axillary recurrence rate, total recurrence rate, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Meta-analyses were performed to compare the odds ratio (OR) in rates and the hazard ratios (HR) in time-to-event outcomes between both interventions. Based on different study designs, tools in the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool were used for randomized trials and the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions to assess the risk of bias for each included article. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used for the publication's bias assessment.
RESULTS
In total, 30 reports from 26 studies were included in the systematic review (9 reports of RCTs, 21 reports of retrospective cohort studies). According to our analysis, omitting ALND in patients with clinically node-negative but SLN-positive breast cancer had a similar axillary recurrence rate (OR = 0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-1.20), DFS (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.89-1.16), and OS (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.92-1.03), but caused a significantly lower incidence of adverse events and benefited in locoregional recurrence rate (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.59-0.97) compared with ALND.
CONCLUSION
For patients with clinically node-negative but SLN-positive breast cancer (no matter the number of the positive SLN), this review showed that SLNB alone had a similar axillary recurrence rate, DFS, and OS, but caused a significantly lower incidence of adverse events and showed a benefit for the locoregional recurrence compared with ALND. An OS benefit was found in the Macro subset that used SLNB alone versus complete ALND. Therefore, omitting ALND is feasible in this setting.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
CRD 42023397963.
Topics: Humans; Female; Sentinel Lymph Node; Breast Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Lymph Node Excision; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; Lymphatic Metastasis; Lymphadenopathy; Axilla; Lymph Nodes
PubMed: 37495945
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02101-8 -
Clinical Breast Cancer Jan 2023This is a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the use of axillary reverse mapping (ARM) with conventional technique for axillary dissection... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This is a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing the use of axillary reverse mapping (ARM) with conventional technique for axillary dissection (AD) in breast cancer surgery.
METHODS
This review was written in line with the PRISMA protocol. Articles were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane databases, using keywords ..úaxillary reverse mapping..Ñ and "axillary lymph node dissection". Non-RCT were excluded. Abstracts were screened independently by 2 reviewers. Data from eligible studies were retrieved for qualitative synthesis and pooled analysis. 73 publications were identified for initial screening.
RESULTS
68 articles were excluded from analysis according to the pre-defined systematic review protocol. 5 RCTS with 1696 subjects were included for analysis. 802 patients received ARM, 894 patients received AD. Pooled ARM node detection rate was 84.9% (Range 79.2 - 94.9%). There was a lower rate of post-operative lymphedema in ARM group patients across all 5 RCTs. The pooled lymphedema incidence in the ARM group was 4.8% (37/766) when compared to 18.8% (164/873) in the AD group (P < .0001). Axillary recurrence rate with median followof 37 months was 1.03% (8/778) in the ARM group, which was identical to 1.03% (9/870) in the AD group (P = 1).
CONCLUSION
ARM resulted in decreased incidence of lymphedema. There was no significant increase in axillary recurrence at 37 months post-operation.
Topics: Humans; Female; Lymph Nodes; Breast Neoplasms; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphedema; Mastectomy; Axilla; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
PubMed: 36384818
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.10.008