-
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer... Aug 2022Currently, the standard method for staging and treatment of axillary lymph nodes for early-stage breast cancer is sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), while axillary lymph... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparing Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis with and without Completion Axillary Lymph Node Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
Currently, the standard method for staging and treatment of axillary lymph nodes for early-stage breast cancer is sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), while axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is used in cases with palpable axillary lymph nodes or positive SLNB cases. The aim of this review was to compare overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and axillary recurrence in early-stage breast cancer patients underwent SLNB or SLNB and completion ALND.
METHODS
The databases of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched using the key words of "breast cancer", "axillary lymph node dissection", and "sentinel lymph node dissection". In addition, other sources were searched for ongoing studies (i.e., clinicaltrials.gov). The clinical trials were evaluated based on the Jadad quality criteria, and cohort studies were evaluated according to the STROBE criteria. At the end of the search, the articles were screened independently by two reviewers to check their eligibility to be included in the study. Afterwards, the data were extracted independently by two researchers.
RESULTS
After searching the databases, 169 papers were retrieved. However, after removing the duplicates and studying the titles and abstracts of these papers, only ten ones underwent further investigation. After reading full-text of each article, four studies were finalized. Following a manual search, 27 papers were entered into the study for the final evaluation, 11 of which were included in the meta-analysis based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings showed no significant differences in OS, DFS, and axillary recurrence in early-stage breast cancer patients underwent SLNB or SLNB and completion ALND.
CONCLUSION
The findings did not confirm that ALND improved OS, DFS, and axillary recurrence in patients who were clinically node-negative and positive SLNB.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Sentinel Lymph Node; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
PubMed: 36037108
DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.8.2561 -
European Radiology Feb 2024This systematic review examined the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing axillary lymph node status (ALNS) after neoadjuvant... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review examined the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing axillary lymph node status (ALNS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify relevant studies and used the QUADAS-2 tool to assess methodological quality of eligible studies. We used STATA version 12.0 to perform data pooling, heterogeneity testing, subgroup analysis, and sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS
For the 21 enrolled studies, including 2875 patients, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were respectively 0.63 (95% CI: 0.53-0.72), 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68-0.81), 2.52 (95% CI: 1.98-3.19), 0.50 (95% CI: 0.39-0.63), and 5.08 (95% CI: 3.38-7.63). The AUC was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72-0.79). I values of sensitivity (I = 94.41%) and specificity (I = 88.97%) were both > 50%. For the initial positive ALN patients, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.64 (95% CI: 0.53-0.75) and 0.74 (95% CI: 0.64-0.82), respectively. Sensitivity analyses by focusing on studies with MRI performed post-NAC, studies using DCE-MRI, or studies with low risk of bias showed similar results to the primary analyses.
CONCLUSION
MRI may have suboptimal diagnostic value in assessing ALNS after NAC for breast cancer patients. Due to the inconsistency of NAC regimens, the variability of axillary surgery, and the lack of time interval between MRI and surgery, further studies are needed to confirm our findings.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT
Our study provided the diagnostic value of MRI in assessing axillary lymph node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer patients.
KEY POINTS
• MRI may have suboptimal diagnostic value in assessing axillary lymph node status after NAC for general breast cancer patients. • The initial axillary lymph node status has little impact on the diagnostic efficacy of MRI. • The substantial heterogeneity among studies highlights the need for further studies to provide more high-quality evidence in this field.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Lymphatic Metastasis; Lymph Nodes; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Axilla; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
PubMed: 37615764
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10155-8 -
International Journal of Surgery... Oct 2016In 2014, the American Society of Clinical Oncology published an updated clinical practice guideline on axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for early-stage breast... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Recommendation for axillary lymph node dissection in women with early breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials using the GRADE system.
BACKGROUND
In 2014, the American Society of Clinical Oncology published an updated clinical practice guideline on axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for early-stage breast cancer patients. However, these recommendations have been challenged because they were based on data from only one randomized controlled trial (RCT). We evaluated the rationale of these recommendations by systematically reviewing RCTs using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) system.
METHODS
We searched articles in the PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were recurrence rate and surgical complications of axillary dissection. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE profiler.
RESULTS
Five eligible studies were retrieved and analyzed. We divided sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis into two categories: SLN micrometastasis and SLN macrometastasis. In patients with 1 or 2 SLN micrometastasis, no significant difference was observed in OS, DFS, or recurrence rate between the ALND and non-ALND groups. For patients with 1 or 2 SLN marcometastasis, only one trial with a moderate risk of bias was included, and non-ALND was the preferred management overall. However, ALND might be appropriate for patients who placed a greater emphasis on longer-term survival at any cost.
CONCLUSION
We recommend non-ALND management for early breast cancer patients with 1 or 2 SLN micrometastasis or macrometastasis on the basis of a systematic review of the current evidence conducted using the GRADE system. However, the optimal practice of evidence-based medicine should incorporate patient preferences, particularly when evidence is limited.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Micrometastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Neoplasm Staging; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sentinel Lymph Node; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
PubMed: 27562691
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.022 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Oct 2022ΟBJECTIVE: This study aimed at comparing survival outcomes between systematic axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) vs sentinel lymph node and axillary lymph node... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
ΟBJECTIVE: This study aimed at comparing survival outcomes between systematic axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) vs sentinel lymph node and axillary lymph node dissection only if sentinel positive (SLN ± ALND) in early-stage, clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. ΜETHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis adhered to PRISMA guidelines was performed. Included studies were prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing survival outcomes of ALND vs. SLN ± ALND in early-stage, node-negative breast cancer patients. Patients enrolled were only those with tumor size lower than 4 cm, clinically negative nodes and treated with breast-conservative surgery. Primary endpoints were locoregional recurrence, overall death and cancer-related death. RESULTS: There were four studies included in the analysis, enrolling overall 2982 patients, of which 1494 in ALND arm and 1488 in the SLN ± ALND arm. No statistically significant difference was observed in locoregional recurrence, breast cancer-related death and overall death. Locoregional recurrence was observed in 2.8% (ALND) vs. 4.1% (SLND ± ALND), (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.20-2.30). Overall death rate was 7.0% vs. 6.8% respectively, (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.73-1.39, I = 28.7%). Breast cancer-related death was 3.6% vs. 3.5%, respectively (SLN ± ALND), (RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.70-1.78, I = 0%). No statistically significant difference was observed in any of secondary study outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic axillary axillary lymph node dissection provides no survival benefit compared with sentinel lymph node dissection for early-stage clinically node-negative breast cancer patients.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Sentinel Lymph Node; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
PubMed: 35249123
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06458-8 -
Computational Intelligence and... 2022With the acceleration of the pace of life and work, the incidence rate of invasive breast cancer is getting higher and higher, and early diagnosis is very important.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
With the acceleration of the pace of life and work, the incidence rate of invasive breast cancer is getting higher and higher, and early diagnosis is very important. This study screened and analyzed the published literature on ultrasound-guided biopsy of invasive breast cancer and obtained the accuracy and practicality of preoperative biopsy.
METHOD
The four databases were screened for the literature. There was no requirement for the start date of retrieval, and the deadline was July 2, 2022. Two researchers screened the literature, respectively, and included the literature on preoperative ultrasound-guided biopsy and intraoperative and postoperative pathological diagnosis of invasive breast cancer. The diagnostic data included in the literature were extracted and meta-analyzed with RevMan 5.4 software, and the bias risk map, forest map, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC) were drawn.
RESULTS
The included 19 studies involved about 18668 patients with invasive breast cancer. The degree of bias of the included literature is low. The distribution range of true positive, false positive, true negative, and false negative in the forest map is large, which may be related to the large difference in the number of patients in each study. Most studies in the SROC curve are at the upper left, indicating that the accuracy of ultrasound-guided axillary biopsy is very high.
CONCLUSION
For invasive breast cancer, preoperative ultrasound-guided biopsy can accurately predict staging and grading of breast cancer, which has important reference value for surgery and follow-up treatment.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lymph Nodes; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; Ultrasonography, Interventional
PubMed: 36203726
DOI: 10.1155/2022/3307627 -
Cancer Apr 2009The regional lymph node control and survival impact of axillary dissection in breast cancer has been the subject of multiple randomized trials, with various results.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The regional lymph node control and survival impact of axillary dissection in breast cancer has been the subject of multiple randomized trials, with various results. This study reviews and conducts a meta-analysis of contemporary trials of axillary dissection in patients with early stage breast cancer.
METHODS
A systematic MEDLINE review identified 3 randomized trials published between January 2000 and January 2007 of axillary dissection versus no dissection in clinically lymph node negative early stage breast cancer patients. A fourth trial of axillary radiotherapy versus no axillary treatment was also identified and included in this review. Meta-analyses were performed for survival, axillary recurrence, metastatic disease, and ipsilateral breast recurrence.
RESULTS
All trials reported a higher rate of axillary recurrence (1.5%-3%, median follow-up 5-15 years) in the absence of axillary dissection or radiotherapy. Overall survival was similar with and without definitive axillary treatment in 3 of the 4 trials, with an increased rate of nonbreast cancer-related death in the observation arm of the fourth trial. Meta-analyses found no significant difference in overall survival (odds ratio [OR] 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-3.24), metastases (OR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.65-1.29), or ipsilateral breast recurrence (OR 1.11; 95% CI, 0.68-1.83) associated with axillary treatment. A significantly lower rate of axillary recurrence was seen after lymphadenectomy (OR 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.73, P<.01).
CONCLUSIONS
Axillary dissection does not confer a survival benefit in the setting of early stage clinically lymph node negative breast cancer. Although the rate of axillary failure was increased in the absence of dissection, the absolute risk was found to be extremely low.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Early Detection of Cancer; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Irradiation; Lymphatic Metastasis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 19199349
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24174 -
Breast Cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Nov 20211. To systematically analyse studies comparing survival outcomes between axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) and axilla observation (Obs), in women with low-risk,... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
1. To systematically analyse studies comparing survival outcomes between axillary lymph-node dissection (ALND) and axilla observation (Obs), in women with low-risk, clinically node-negative breast cancer. 2. To consider results in the context of current axillary surgery de-escalation trials and studies.
METHODS
9 eligible studies were identified, 6 RCTs and 3 non-randomized studies (4236 women in total). Outcomes assessed: overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The logged (ln) hazard ratio (HR) was calculated and used as the statistic of interest. Data was grouped by follow-up.
RESULTS
Meta-analyses found no significant difference in OS at 5, 10 and 25-years follow-up (5-year ln HR = 0.08, 95% CI - 0.09, 0.25, 10-year ln HR = 0.33, 95% CI - 0.07, 0.72, 25-year ln HR = 0.00, 95% CI - 0.18, 0.19). ALND caused improvement in DFS at 5-years follow-up (ln HR = 0.16, 95% CI 0.03, 0.29), this was not demonstrated at 10 and 25-years follow-up (10-year ln HR = 0.07, 95% CI - 0.09, 0.23, 25-year ln HR = - 0.03, 95% CI - 0.21, 0.16). Studies supporting ALND for DFS at 5-years follow-up had greater relative chemotherapy use in the ALND cohort.
CONCLUSION
ALND does not cause a significant improvement in OS in women with clinically node-negative breast cancer. ALND may improve DFS in the short term by tailoring a proportion of patients towards chemotherapy. Our evidence suggests that when the administration of systemic therapy is balanced between the two arms, axillary de-escalation studies will likely find no difference in OS or DFS.
Topics: Aged; Breast Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphatic Metastasis; Middle Aged; Progression-Free Survival; Watchful Waiting
PubMed: 34241800
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-021-01273-6 -
World Journal of Surgery Feb 2023Evaluation of axillary lymph nodes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer is mostly done by intra-operative frozen section biopsy (FSB) and/ or touch... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Evaluation of axillary lymph nodes after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer is mostly done by intra-operative frozen section biopsy (FSB) and/ or touch imprint cytology (TIC). In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we have compared the accuracy of the two modalities.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane electronic databases were searched for articles comparing TIC with FSB. Articles were assessed for methodological and reporting quality. The main summary measures were pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and diagnostic accuracy using bivariate generalized linear mixed models using random effects.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for FSB were 78%, 100%, and 98.57%. For TIC, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 74%, 98%, and 98.37%. For both methods, visual inspection of summary ROC curves and of forest plots did not show significant heterogeneity.
CONCLUSION
TIC showed comparable sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to FSB and hence can be used as its substitute as a rapid and economical test for the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis during SLNB especially in low-resource settings.
Topics: Female; Humans; Breast Neoplasms; Frozen Sections; Lymph Nodes; Lymphadenopathy; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sentinel Lymph Node; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
PubMed: 36310323
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06800-w -
JAMA Oct 2013Recent data from clinical trials have challenged traditional thinking about axillary surgery in patients with breast cancer. (Review)
Review
IMPORTANCE
Recent data from clinical trials have challenged traditional thinking about axillary surgery in patients with breast cancer.
OBJECTIVES
To summarize evidence regarding the role of axillary interventions (surgical and nonsurgical) in breast cancer treatment and to review the association of these axillary interventions with recurrence of axillary node metastases, mortality, and morbidity outcomes in patients with breast cancer.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
Ovid MEDLINE (1946-July 2013), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2005-July 2013), Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (1994-July 2013), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (1989-July 2013) were searched for publications on axillary interventions in breast cancer. Clinical trials, observational studies, and meta-analyses with at least 2-year follow-up were included. A total of 1070 publications were reviewed, 17 of which met final inclusion criteria.
FINDINGS
Partial mastectomy followed by whole breast radiation is breast-conserving therapy. For women with no suspicious, palpable axillary nodes who undergo breast-conserving therapy, there is little evidence of benefit from surgical complete axillary node dissection compared with sentinel node biopsy alone. Complete axillary node dissection in patients with no palpable lymph nodes, compared with sentinel node biopsy, provides no survival benefit and is associated with a 1% to 3% reduction in recurrence of axillary lymph node metastases, but is associated with a 14% risk of lymphedema. Surgical axillary staging via sentinel node biopsy in patients with benign axillary nodes on radiological and clinical examination helps to inform decisions regarding adjuvant systemic and radiation therapy. Patients and physicians should tailor axillary lymph node interventions to maximize regional disease control and minimize morbidity. Complete axillary lymph node dissection is indicated in patients who present with palpable or needle biopsy-proven axillary metastases, patients with positive sentinel nodes undergoing mastectomy (who do not, as a standard, receive adjuvant radiation), patients with more than 3 positive sentinel nodes undergoing breast-conserving therapy, and patients not meeting eligibility criteria for recent trials establishing the safety of sentinel node biopsy alone in patients with breast cancer and metastases in their sentinel nodes.
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE
Available evidence suggests that axillary node dissection is associated with more harm than benefit in women undergoing breast-conserving therapy who do not have palpable, suspicious lymph nodes, who have tumors 3.0 cm or smaller, and who have 3 or fewer positive nodes on sentinel node biopsy.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphatic Metastasis; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 24084924
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.277804 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... May 2016Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide. Fortunately, the overall survival is good. Therefore it is important to focus on the morbidities related... (Review)
Review
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women worldwide. Fortunately, the overall survival is good. Therefore it is important to focus on the morbidities related to breast cancer treatment. One of the most dreaded morbidities is lymphedema. In 2007 the Axillary Reverse Mapping (ARM) was introduced to limit the invasiveness in the axilla during breast cancer surgery. It is hypothesized that ARM is able to limit the incidence of breast cancer related lymphedema (BCRL) considerably. This systematic review aims to answer the following research questions: (1) which approaches for ARM are described? (2) Is ARM surgical feasible and oncological safe? (3) Does ARM decrease the incidence of lymphedema after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)? In total 27 papers were retrieved using four electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Medline and Cochrane clinical trials; assessed until May 13, 2015. The level of evidence of these studies was low (mostly level 3). Therefore the conclusions are that the ARM procedure is feasible although ARM-node rates have a broad range. Additionally, from a theoretical point there is a clear benefit from ARM in terms of lymphedema prevention. From a practical point there is little scientific data to support this due to the lack of studies; and especially because of the different methods and definitions for lymphedema used in the different studies.
Topics: Axilla; Breast Cancer Lymphedema; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Lymphatic System; Postoperative Complications; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
PubMed: 27019287
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.03.014