-
Allergy Apr 2021As an evidence resource for the currently planned European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) clinical practice guideline "systemic treatment of atopic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
As an evidence resource for the currently planned European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) clinical practice guideline "systemic treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD)," we critically appraised evidence on systemic treatments for moderate-to-severe AD.
METHODS
We systematically identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the safety and efficacy of systemic treatments for AD up to February 2020. Primary efficacy outcomes were clinical signs, AD symptoms and health-related quality of life. Primary safety outcomes included cumulative incidence rates for (serious) adverse events. Trial quality was assessed applying the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. Meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate.
RESULTS
50 RCTs totalling 6681 patients were included. Trial evidence was identified for apremilast, azathioprine (AZA), baricitinib, ciclosporin A (CSA), corticosteroids, dupilumab, interferon-gamma, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG), mepolizumab, methotrexate (MTX), omalizumab, upadacitinib and ustekinumab. Meta-analyses were indicated for the efficacy of baricitinib [EASI75 RD 0.16, 95% CI (0.10;0.23)] and dupilumab [EASI75, RD 0.37, 95% CI (0.32;0.42)] indicating short-term (ie 16-week treatment) superiority over placebo. Furthermore, efficacy analyses of AZA and CSA indicated short-term superiority over placebo; however, nonvalidated scores were used and can therefore not be compared to EASI.
CONCLUSION
The most robust, replicated high-quality trial evidence is present for the efficacy and safety of dupilumab for up to 1 year in adults. Robust trial evidence was further revealed for AZA, baricitinib and CSA. Methodological restrictions led to limited evidence-based conclusions for all other systemic treatments. Head-to-head trials with novel systemic treatments are required to clarify the future role of conventional therapies.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Cyclosporine; Dermatitis, Atopic; Eczema; Humans
PubMed: 33074565
DOI: 10.1111/all.14631 -
Journal of Translational Autoimmunity 2021Gastrointestinal involvement is a common complain observed in 40-60% of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. We performed a systematic review of clinically... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Gastrointestinal involvement is a common complain observed in 40-60% of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. We performed a systematic review of clinically severe and potential life-threatening gastrointestinal manifestations and discuss clinical presentation, pathogenesis and treatment.
METHODS
We performed a literature search in English literature using PubMed and Embase from 2000 to December 2020. The following MeSH terms: systemic lupus erythematosus, protein-losing enteropathy, ascites, pancreatitis, vasculitis, intestinal vasculitis, enteritis and diarrhea published in the English literature.
RESULTS
We identified 141 studies (case reports, case series and cohort studies). The most frequent presenting symptoms are acute abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Many of the manifestations were associated with disease activity. Histological features are rarely available, but both vasculitis and thrombosis have been described. There is no treatment guideline. The majority of patients were treated with corticosteroids and the most common immunososupressant were azathioprine, cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate.
CONCLUSION
Vasculitis and thrombosis may be responsible for severe life-threatening manifestations such as pancreatitis, protein loosing gastroenteritis, acalculous cholecistyitis and enteritis.
PubMed: 34179742
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2021.100106 -
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology May 2022Due to the rarity of relapsing polychondritis (RP), no randomised clinical trial has been conducted to date and treatment remains empirical. We performed a systematic... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Due to the rarity of relapsing polychondritis (RP), no randomised clinical trial has been conducted to date and treatment remains empirical. We performed a systematic literature review to assess the efficacy of the main conventional immunosuppressants and biotherapies used in RP.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE for original articles without language restriction. Abstracts from American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) were also considered for inclusion. Observational studies and clinical trials reporting on the efficacy of conventional immunosuppressants and biotherapies in adult patients with RP were selected and pooled response rates for each treatment were computed.
RESULTS
Of 304 articles and abstracts identified, 31 underwent full-text review, and 11 were included. The studies involved a total of 177 patients, exposed to a total of 247 lines of treatments. The main treatments studied (by number of lines) were: TNF inhibitors (TNFi), n=92; methotrexate (MTX), n=38; tocilizumab (TCZ), n=26; anakinra (ANA), n=21; rituximab (RTX), n=16; abatacept (ABT), n=14; cyclophosphamide (CYC), n=14; azathioprine (AZA), n=13. The pooled response rates across studies were: 72% [95% CI: 42-95] for ABT, 66% [95% CI: 49-82] for TCZ, 64% [95% CI: 53-74] for TNFi, 56% [95% CI: 37-73] for MTX, 47% [95% CI: 26-68] for ANA, 43% [95% CI: 20-68] for RTX. Based on more limited data, response rates for AZA and CYC ranged from 38 to 100% and from 25 to 100%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review of available evidence regarding the treatment of relapsing polychondritis, ABT, TCZ and TNFi were the drugs associated with the best outcomes. ABT efficacy must be interpreted in light of the small number of patients treated. While MTX had slightly less efficacy, it is one of the drugs for which data are the most robust.
Topics: Abatacept; Adult; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Methotrexate; Polychondritis, Relapsing; Rituximab; Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors
PubMed: 35238756
DOI: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/h9gq1o -
Revue Neurologique Sep 2022Rasmussen's encephalitis (RE) is a severe, rare, chronic inflammatory brain disease resulting in drug-resistant epilepsy and progressive destruction of one hemisphere... (Review)
Review
Rasmussen's encephalitis (RE) is a severe, rare, chronic inflammatory brain disease resulting in drug-resistant epilepsy and progressive destruction of one hemisphere with loss of neurological function. RE is associated with a deterioration of background electroencephalography (EEG) activity, a progressive atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging and an extensive positron emission tomography hypometabolism over the affected hemisphere. RE is an immune-mediated disease, with a predominant role of CD8+ T cytotoxic cells, microglial cells, and activation of inflammasome pathway. The diagnosis of RE is based on clinical (intractable epilepsy and neurological deterioration), electrophysiological (unilateral EEG slowing) and MRI (hemiatrophy) criteria. Antiseizure medications are generally unable to stop seizures. The most effective procedure is hemispherotomy (surgical disconnection of one cerebral hemisphere), but this is associated with permanent motor and neurological deficits. Treatments targeting the immune system are recommended especially in the early stages of the disease or in patients with slow disease progression and mild deficits and/or not eligible for surgery. Based on the pathophysiology, several immunotherapies have been tried in RE (none exhaustively: corticosteroid, intravenous immunoglobulins, tacrolimus, azathioprine, adalimumab, mycophenolate mofetil, natalizumab). However, only small cohorts have been reported without comparative study. In this review, we will summarise some pathophysiological mechanisms of RE, before reporting the literature data concerning immunotherapies. We then discuss the limitations of these studies and the prospects for further research.
Topics: Atrophy; Brain; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Electroencephalography; Encephalitis; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 35131107
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2022.01.007 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2021Belimumab, the first biologic approved for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), has been shown to reduce autoantibody levels in people with SLE and help... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Belimumab, the first biologic approved for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), has been shown to reduce autoantibody levels in people with SLE and help control disease activity.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the benefits and harms of belimumab (alone or in combination) in systematic lupus erythematosus.
SEARCH METHODS
An Information Specialist carried out the searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and clinicaltrials.gov from inception to 25 September 2019. There were no language or date restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or controlled clinical trials (CCTs) of belimumab (alone or in combination) compared to placebo/control treatment (immunosuppressive drugs, such as azathioprine, cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil or another biologic), in adults with SLE.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard methodologic procedures expected by Cochrane.
MAIN RESULTS
Six RCTs (2917 participants) qualified for quantitative analyses. All included studies were multicenter, international or US-based. The age range of the included participants was 22 to 80 years; most were women; and study duration ranged from 84 days to 76 weeks. The risk of bias was generally low except for attrition bias, which was high in 67% of studies. Compared to placebo, more participants on belimumab 10 mg/kg (Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved dose) showed at least a 4-point improvement (reduction) in Safety of Estrogen in Lupus National Assessment (SELENA) - Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score, a validated SLE disease activity index: (risk ratio (RR) 1.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.22 to 1.45; 829/1589 in belimumab group and 424/1077 in placebo; I= 0%; 4 RCTs; high-certainty evidence). Change in health-related quality of life (HRQOL), assessed by Short Form-36 Physical Component Summary score improvement (range 0 to 100), showed there was probably little or no difference between groups (mean difference 1.6 points, 95% CI 0.30 to 2.90; 401 in belimumab group and 400 in placebo; I= 0%; 2 RCTs; moderate-certainty evidence). The belimumab 10 mg/kg group showed greater improvement in glucocorticoid dose, with a higher proportion of participants reducing their dose by at least 50% compared to placebo (RR 1.59, 95% CI 1.17 to 2.15; 81/269 in belimumab group and 52/268 in placebo; I= 0%; 2 RCTs; high-certainty evidence). The proportion of participants experiencing harm may not differ meaningfully between the belimumab 10 mg/kg and placebo groups: one or more serious adverse event (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.11; 238/1700 in belimumab group and 199/1190 in placebo; I= 48%; 5 RCTs; low-certainty evidence; ); one or more serious infection (RR 1.01, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.54; 44/1230 in belimumab group and 40/955 in placebo; I= 0%; 4 RCTs; moderate-certainty evidence); and withdrawals due to adverse events (RR 0.82, 95% CI: 0.63 to 1.07; 113/1700 in belimumab group and 94/1190 in placebo; I= 0%; 5 RCTs; moderate-certainty evidence). Mortality was rare, and may not differ between belimumab 10 mg/kg and placebo (Peto odds ratio 1.15, 95% CI 0.41 to 3.25; 9/1714 in belimumab group and 6/1203 in placebo; I= 4%; 6 RCTs; low-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The six studies that provided evidence for benefits and harms of belimumab were well-designed, high-quality RCTs. At the FDA-approved dose of 10 mg/kg, based on moderate to high-certainty data, belimumab was probably associated with a clinically meaningful efficacy benefit compared to placebo in participants with SLE at 52 weeks. Evidence related to harms is inconclusive and mostly of moderate to low-certainty evidence. More data are needed for the longer-term efficacy of belimumab.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Bias; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 33631841
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010668.pub2 -
RMD Open Jun 2023To summarise and update evidence to inform the 2022 update of the European Alliance of Associations of Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations for the management of...
Systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV): Part 2 - Treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and diagnosis and general management of AAV.
OBJECTIVE
To summarise and update evidence to inform the 2022 update of the European Alliance of Associations of Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV).
METHODS
Three systematic literature reviews (SLR) were performed. PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched from 1 February 2015 to 25 February 2022. The evidence presented herein covers the treatment of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) as well as diagnostic testing and general management of all AAV syndromes.
RESULTS
For the treatment of EGPA, diagnostic procedures and general management 3517, 4137 and 4215 articles were screened and 26, 110 and 63 articles were included in the final evidence syntheses, respectively. For EGPA patients with newly diagnosed disease without unfavourable prognostic factors, azathioprine (AZA) combined with glucocorticoids (GC) is not superior to GC monotherapy to induce remission (LoE 2b). In patients with active EGPA and unfavourable prognostic factors, cyclophosphamide or rituximab can be used for remission induction (LoE 2b). Treatment with Mepolizumab added to standard treatment results in higher rates of sustained remission in patients with relapsing or refractory EGPA without active organ-threatening or life-threatening manifestations (LoE 1b) and reduces GC use. Kidney biopsies have prognostic value in AAV patients with renal involvement (LoE 2a). In the context of suspected AAV, immunoassays for proteinase 3 and myeloperoxidase-ANCA have higher diagnostic accuracy compared with indirect immunofluorescent testing (LoE 1a).
CONCLUSION
This SLR provides current evidence to inform the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of AAV.
Topics: Humans; Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis; Churg-Strauss Syndrome; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Rheumatology; Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis
PubMed: 37349121
DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003083 -
Journal of the European Academy of... Jun 2021Alopecia areata is the third most common cause of dermatology consultations in children but the treatment of paediatric alopecia areata remains challenging. A systematic... (Review)
Review
Alopecia areata is the third most common cause of dermatology consultations in children but the treatment of paediatric alopecia areata remains challenging. A systematic review of the literature about the treatment of alopecia areata in children (≤18 years old) was performed on 11 May 2020 by searching the PubMed, Scopus and EBSCO databases. The terms used for the search were: 'alopecia areata', 'alopecia totalis' or 'alopecia universalis' combined with 'paediatric', 'children' or 'childhood'. A total of 89 articles were included in final evaluation. The most commonly assessed treatment options in paediatric alopecia areata were topical immunotherapy (response rate in monotherapy: 54%; 187/345) intralesional glucocorticosteroids (75%; 211/280), systemic glucocorticosteroids (73%; 102/140), and anthralin (42%; 31/74). Topical glucocorticosteroids (81%; 35/43), systemic Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (90%; 27/30), topical calcineurin inhibitors (42%; 8/19), topical JAK inhibitors (65%; 11/17), PUVA therapy (56%; 9/16) and 308-nm excimer laser (77%; 10/13) were also evaluated. Additionally, evaluation in smaller numbers of paediatric patients included methotrexate (100%; 10/10), topical minoxidil (44%; 4/9) and cyclosporine (83%; 5/6). There were limited data considering children with alopecia areata treated with azathioprine, hydroxychloroquine, topical sildenafil, topical prostaglandin analogues, fractional carbon dioxide laser, leflunomide, mesalazine, apremilast, dupilumab, ustekinumab, efalizumab, botulinum toxin, and compound glycyrrhizin. On the basis of the limited data available glucocorticosteroids (systemic, intralesional or topical) and JAK inhibitors (systemic or topical) may be considered the best documented and most effective treatment options in alopecia areata in children. There are no sufficient paediatric data to compare treatment safety and relapse rates in these therapeutic modalities.
Topics: Adolescent; Alopecia; Alopecia Areata; Child; Humans; Janus Kinase Inhibitors; Leflunomide; Minoxidil; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33630354
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.17187 -
American Journal of Transplantation :... Dec 2016Azathioprine, a purine antimetabolite immunosuppressant, photosensitizes the skin and causes the production of mutagenic reactive oxygen species. It is postulated to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Azathioprine, a purine antimetabolite immunosuppressant, photosensitizes the skin and causes the production of mutagenic reactive oxygen species. It is postulated to increase the risk of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and other skin cancers in organ transplant recipients (OTRs), but evidence from multiple, largely single-center studies to date has been inconsistent. We aimed to resolve the issue of azathioprine's carcinogenicity by conducting a systematic review of the relevant literature and pooling published risk estimates to evaluate the risks of SCC, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), keratinocyte cancers (KCs) overall and other skin cancers in relation to azathioprine treatment. Twenty-seven studies were included in total, with risk estimates from 13 of these studies able to be pooled for quantitative analysis. The overall summary estimate showed a significantly increased risk of SCC in relation to azathioprine exposure (1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-2.18). No significant associations between azathioprine treatment and BCC (0.96, 95% CI 0.66-1.40) or KC (0.84, 95% CI 0.59-1.21) risk were observed. There was significant heterogeneity between studies for azathioprine risk estimates and the outcomes of SCC, BCC and KC. The pooled findings of available evidence support the contention that treatment with azathioprine increases the risk of SCC in OTRs.
Topics: Azathioprine; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Graft Rejection; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Organ Transplantation; Postoperative Complications; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Skin Neoplasms
PubMed: 27163483
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13863 -
RMD Open Jul 2023To summarise and update evidence to inform the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis...
Systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV): part 1-treatment of granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis.
OBJECTIVE
To summarise and update evidence to inform the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV).
METHODS
A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to identify current evidence regarding treatment of AAV. PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library were searched from 1 February 2015 to 25 February 2022. The evidence presented here is focused on the treatment of granulomatosis with polyangiitis and microscopic polyangiitis.
RESULTS
3517 articles were screened and 175 assessed by full-text review. Ninety articles were included in the final evidence synthesis. Cyclophosphamide and rituximab (RTX) show similar efficacy for remission induction (level of evidence (LoE) 1a) but RTX is more effective in relapsing disease (LoE 1b). Glucocorticoid (GC) protocols with faster tapering result in similar remission rates but lower rates of serious infections (LoE 1b). Avacopan can be used to rapidly taper and replace GC (LoE 1b). Data on plasma exchange are inconsistent depending on the analysed trial populations but meta-analyses based on randomised controlled trials demonstrate a reduction of the risk of end-stage kidney disease at 1 year but not during long-term follow-up (LoE 1a). Use of RTX for maintenance of remission is associated with lower relapse rates compared with azathioprine (AZA, LoE 1b). Prolonged maintenance treatment results in lower relapse rates for both, AZA (LoE 1b) and RTX (LoE 1b).
CONCLUSION
This SLR provides current evidence to inform the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of AAV.
Topics: Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis; Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis; Humans; Microscopic Polyangiitis; Cyclophosphamide; Rituximab; Glucocorticoids; Remission Induction
PubMed: 37479496
DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003082 -
BMJ Open Respiratory Research Feb 2024Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) are immunomodulatory treatments in interstitial lung disease (ILD). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) are immunomodulatory treatments in interstitial lung disease (ILD). This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of MMF or AZA on pulmonary function in ILD.
DESIGN
Population included any ILD diagnosis, intervention included MMF or AZA treatment, outcome was delta change from baseline in per cent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) and gas transfer (diffusion lung capacity of carbon monoxide, %DLco). The primary endpoint compared outcomes relative to placebo comparator, the secondary endpoint assessed outcomes in treated groups only.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective observational studies were included. No language restrictions were applied. Retrospective studies and studies with high-dose concomitant steroids were excluded.
DATA SYNTHESIS
The systematic search was performed on 9 May. Meta-analyses according to drug and outcome were specified with random effects, I evaluated heterogeneity and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation evaluated certainty of evidence. Primary endpoint analysis was restricted to RCT design, secondary endpoint included subgroup analysis according to prospective observational or RCT design.
RESULTS
A total of 2831 publications were screened, 12 were suitable for quantitative synthesis. Three MMF RCTs were included with no significant effect on the primary endpoints (%FVC 2.94, 95% CI -4.00 to 9.88, I=79.3%; %DLco -2.03, 95% CI -4.38 to 0.32, I=0.0%). An overall 2.03% change from baseline in %FVC (95% CI 0.65 to 3.42, I=0.0%) was observed in MMF, and RCT subgroup summary estimated a 4.42% change from baseline in %DL (95% CI 2.05 to 6.79, I=0.0%). AZA studies were limited. All estimates were considered very low certainty evidence.
CONCLUSIONS
There were limited RCTs of MMF or AZA and their benefit in ILD was of very low certainty. MMF may support preservation of pulmonary function, yet confidence in the effect was weak. To support high certainty evidence, RCTs should be designed to directly assess MMF efficacy in ILD.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42023423223.
Topics: Humans; Azathioprine; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lung Diseases, Interstitial; Lung; Mycophenolic Acid; Enzyme Inhibitors; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 38413120
DOI: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002163