-
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology =... Jan 2001To identify the frequency of use and appropriate monitoring guidelines for the adverse effects of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) in the therapy of patients... (Review)
Review
Frequency of use and standards of care for the use of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review of the literature and a survey of Canadian gastroenterologists.
OBJECTIVE
To identify the frequency of use and appropriate monitoring guidelines for the adverse effects of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) in the therapy of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
METHODS
Surveys were sent to all physician members of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology. Physicians were asked to describe their monitoring practices for IBD patients receiving azathioprine or 6-MP. A systematic literature search was also performed using MEDLINE for articles published in English between 1966 and 1999 using the MeSH terms 'azathioprine', '6-mercaptopurine', 'inflammatory bowel disease' and 'drug monitoring'.
RESULTS
Azathioprine and 6-MP were used to treat an average of 7% of patients - a surprisingly low number given the proven efficacy of these agents. All respondents reported monitoring complete blood counts (CBC), while liver enzyme and pancreatic enzyme levels were monitored by 62% and 29% of respondents, respectively. The most commonly reported initial CBC testing frequencies were weekly (42%), monthly (26%) and biweekly (23%). From the literature, it was determined that severe leukopenia (less than 2.10 g/L) occurs in less than 2% of cases and is sometimes associated with serious outcomes, including death. Most cases of severe leukopenia occurred abruptly, early in treatment. Other reported adverse effects and incidences were pancreatitis (3% to 5%), hepatotoxicity (less than 1%) and hypersensitivity (2% to 3%). Data concerning an increased risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were equivocal.
CONCLUSIONS
Use of azathioprine or 6-MP is low in patients with IBD. A CBC should be performed at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12, with subsequent testing every eight weeks for the duration of azathioprine or 6-MP treatment. The evidence in support of pancreatic and hepatic monitoring is weak. The risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is likely low.
Topics: Azathioprine; Canada; Drug Utilization; Gastroenterology; Health Care Surveys; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Leukopenia; Mercaptopurine; Practice Patterns, Physicians'
PubMed: 11173323
DOI: 10.1155/2001/518192 -
BMC Medicine Sep 2016To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the risk of serious infections with immunosuppressive medications and glucocorticoids in lupus... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the risk of serious infections with immunosuppressive medications and glucocorticoids in lupus nephritis.
METHODS
A trained librarian performed two searches: (1) PubMed for all lupus nephritis trials from the end dates for the systematic review for the 2012 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) lupus nephritis treatment guidelines and the 2012 Cochrane Systematic Review on treatments for lupus nephritis, to September 2013; and (2) PubMed and SCOPUS for all lupus trials (excluding lupus nephritis) from inception to February 2014, to obtain additional trials for harms data in any lupus patient. The search was updated to May 2016. Duplicate title/abstract review and duplicate data abstractions by two abstractors independently was performed for all eligible studies, including those studies abstracted for the 2012 ACR lupus nephritis treatment guidelines and the 2012 Cochrane Systematic Review on lupus nephritis treatments. We performed a systematic review and a Bayesian NMA, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of immunosuppressive drugs or glucocorticoids in patients with lupus nephritis assessing serious infection risk. Markov chain Monte Carlo methods were used to model 95 % credible intervals (CrI). Sensitivity analyses examined the robustness of estimates.
RESULTS
A total of 32 RCTs with 2611 patients provided data. There were 26 two-arm, five three-arm, and one four-arm trials. We found that tacrolimus was associated with significantly lower risk of serious infections compared to glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide (CYC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and azathioprine (AZA) with odds ratios (95 % CrI) of 0.33 (0.12-0.88), 0.37 (0.15-0.87), 0.340 (0.18-0.81), and 0.32 (0.12-0.81), respectively. Conversely, CYC low dose (LD), CYC high dose (HD), and HD glucocorticoids were associated with higher odds of serious infections compared to tacrolimus, ranging from 4.84 to 12.83. We also found that MMF followed by AZA (MMF-AZA) was associated with significantly lower risk of serious infections as compared to CYC LD, CYC HD, CYC-AZA, or HD glucocorticoids with odds ratios (95 % CrI) of 0.09 (0.01-0.76), 0.07 (0.01-0.54), 0.14 (0.02-0.71), and 0.03 (0.00-0.56), respectively. Estimates were similar to pair-wise meta-analyses. Sensitivity analyses that varied estimate (odds ratio vs. Peto's odds ratio), method (random vs. fixed effects model), data (sepsis vs. serious infection data; exclusion of observational studies), treatment grouping (CYC and CYC HD as a combined treatment group vs. separate), made little/no difference to these estimates.
CONCLUSIONS
Tacrolimus and MMF-AZA combination were associated with lower risk of serious infections compared to other immunosuppressive drugs or glucocorticoids for lupus nephritis. In conjunction with comparative efficacy data, these data can help patients make informed decisions about treatment options for lupus nephritis.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION
CRD42016032965.
Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Communicable Diseases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lupus Nephritis; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27623861
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-016-0673-8 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2014Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory condition. Many patients fail to achieve remission with medical management and require surgical interventions.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory condition. Many patients fail to achieve remission with medical management and require surgical interventions. Purine analogues have been used to maintain surgically-induced remission in CD, but the effectiveness of these agents is unclear.
OBJECTIVES
The objectives were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of purine analogues for maintenance of surgically-induced remission in CD.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the following databases from inception to 30 April 2014: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Functional Bowel Disorders Group Specialized Trials Register). We also searched the reference lists of all included studies, and contacted personal sources and drug companies to identify additional studies. The searches were not limited by language.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared purine analogues to placebo or another intervention, with treatment durations of at least six months were considered for inclusion. Participants were patients of any age with CD in remission following surgery.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed trial eligibility and extracted data. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome measures were clinical and endoscopic relapse as defined by the primary studies. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, withdrawal due to adverse events and serious adverse events. Data were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis where patients with missing final outcomes were assumed to have relapsed. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for dichotomous outcomes. The Chi(2) and I(2) statistics were used to assess heterogeneity. The overall quality of the evidence supporting the primary outcomes and selected secondary outcomes was assessed using the GRADE criteria.
MAIN RESULTS
Seven RCTs (n = 584 patients) were included in the review. Three studies compared azathioprine to 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA). One small study compared azathioprine to both 5-ASA and adalimumab. One study compared azathioprine to placebo and another study compared 6-mercaptopurine to 5-ASA and placebo. One small study compared azathioprine to infliximab. Three studies were judged to be at low risk of bias. Four studies were judged to be at high risk of bias due to blinding. The study (n = 22) comparing azathioprine to infliximab found that the effects on the proportion of patients who had a clinical (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.21 to 18.98) or endoscopic relapse (RR 4.40, 95% CI 0.59 to 3.07) were uncertain. One study (n = 33) found decreased clinical (RR 5.18, 95% CI 1.35 to 19.83) and endoscopic relapse (RR 10.35, 95% CI 1.50 to 71.32) rates favouring adalimumab over azathioprine. A pooled analysis of two studies (n = 168 patients) showed decreased clinical relapse rates at one or two years favouring purine analogues over placebo. Forty-eight per cent of patients in the purine analogue group experienced a clinical relapse compared to 63% of placebo patients (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.94). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was low due to high risk of bias (one study was single-blind) and sparse data (93 events). One study (87 patients) found a reduction in endoscopic relapse rates favouring 6-mercaptopurine over placebo. Seventeen per cent of 6-mercaptopurine patients had an endoscopic relapse at two years compared to 42% of placebo patients (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.83). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence for this outcome was low due to very sparse data (25 events). A pooled analysis of five studies (n = 425 patients) showed no difference in clinical relapse rates at one or two years between purine analogues and 5-ASA agents. Sixty-three per cent of patients in the purine analogues group experienced a clinical relapse compared to 54% of 5-ASA patients (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.34). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence supporting this outcome was very low due to high risk of bias (two open-label studies), sparse data (249 events) and moderate heterogeneity (I(2) = 45%). There was no difference in endoscopic relapse at 12 months between azathioprine and 5-ASA (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.17; 1 study, 35 patients). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence for this outcome was very low due to high risk of bias (open-label study) and very sparse data (26 events). There was a reduction in endoscopic relapse at 24 months favouring 6-mercaptopurine over 5-ASA patients. Seventeen per cent of 6-mercaptopurine patients had an endoscopic relapse compared to 48% of 5-ASA patients (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.72; 1 study, 91 patients). A GRADE analysis indicated that the overall quality of the evidence for this outcome was low due to very sparse data (29 events). Adverse events that required withdrawal were more common in the purine analogue group compared to 5-ASA. Twenty per cent of patients in the purine analogue group withdrew due to adverse events compared to 10% of 5-ASA patients (RR 2.07, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.39; 5 studies, 423 patients).The results for withdrawal due to adverse events between purine analogues and placebo or for other comparisons were uncertain. Commonly reported adverse events across all studies included leucopenia, arthralgia, abdominal pain or severe epigastric intolerance, elevated liver enzymes, nausea and vomiting, pancreatitis, anaemia, exacerbation of Crohn's disease, nasopharyngitis, and flatulence.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Purine analogues may be superior to placebo for maintenance of surgically-induced remission in patients with CD, although this is based on two small studies. The results for efficacy outcomes between purine analogues and 5-ASA agents were uncertain. However, patients taking purine analogues were more likely than 5-ASA patients to discontinue therapy due to adverse events. No firm conclusions can be drawn from the two small studies that compared azathioprine to infliximab or adalimumab. Adalimumab may be superior to azathioprine but further research is needed to confirm these results. Further research investigating the efficacy and safety of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine in comparison to other active medications in patients with surgically-induced remission of CD is warranted.
Topics: Adalimumab; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Azathioprine; Crohn Disease; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Infliximab; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Mercaptopurine; Mesalamine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Remission Induction; Secondary Prevention
PubMed: 25081347
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010233.pub2 -
Danish Medical Journal Dec 2016Refractory coeliac disease (RCD) is a rare and severe malabsorptive disease. The condition has two subtypes: RCDI and RCDII. Different treatments have been tested: and... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Refractory coeliac disease (RCD) is a rare and severe malabsorptive disease. The condition has two subtypes: RCDI and RCDII. Different treatments have been tested: and because RCD has a poor prognosis due to progress to enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, the aim was to review the epidemiologic aspects and the therapeutic options for RCD.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed in 18 databases, and 122 records were identified. Incidence, prevalence, treatment methods and their efficacy were evaluated.
RESULTS
Among coeliac disease patients, the cumulative incidence of RCD is 1-4% per ten-year period and the prevalence is 0.31-0.38%. In the general population, the prevalence of RCD is 0.002%. Treatment of RCDI is azathioprine (effect 100%), mesalamine (effect 60%) or tioguanine (effect 83%). Treatment for RCDII is the antimetabolite cladribine (effect 81%) and autologous haematopoetic stem cell transplantation (effect 85%).
CONCLUSION
RCD is a very rare disease. The current evidence for RCDI treatment includes prednisolone in combination with the immunosuppressants azathioprine, mesalamine or tioguanine. The current evidence for RCDII treatment documents use of the antimetabolite cladribine, and if there is no effect, autologous haematopoetic stem cell transplantation may be attempted. In the future, there is a need for more effective treatments which will also prevent further progression to enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Azathioprine; Celiac Disease; Cladribine; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Incidence; Mesalamine; Prednisolone; Prevalence; Thioguanine
PubMed: 27910801
DOI: No ID Found -
Medicine Oct 2017To assess the efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory drugs in patients with noninfectious anterior uveitis (AU). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
To assess the efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory drugs in patients with noninfectious anterior uveitis (AU).
METHODS
Systematic review of studies were retrieved from Medline (1961 to March 2016), Embase (1961 to March 2016), and Cochrane Library (up to March 2016), and a complementary hand search was also performed. The selection criteria were as follows: (population) noninfectious AU patients, adults; (intervention) immunomodulatory drugs (any dose, regimen, route of administration, duration of treatment); (outcome) control of inflammation, steroid-sparing effect, AU flares, adverse events, and so on; (study design) systematic literature reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies. The study quality was assessed using the Jadad scale and according to The Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine (update 2009).
RESULTS
We included 13 studies of moderate-poor quality, with a mean duration from 5 months to 20 years, and number of AU patients ranging from 9 to 274. Patient's demographic and clinical characteristics were very heterogeneous. In most cases, uveitis anatomic classification criteria and outcomes definitions were unclear. Some of the studies only included AU patients with a systemic disease associated, mostly spondyloarthritis, others, mixed populations (idiopathic and systemic disease associated patients), and in some articles this data is not described. We found that methotrexate, cyclosporine A, azathioprine, adalimumab, and golimumab might prevent AU flares, improve ocular inflammation and visual acuity, and decrease systemic steroids doses.
CONCLUSIONS
Although there is a lack of robust evidence, methotrexate, cyclosporine A, azathioprine, adalimumab, and golimumab might be effective in AU patients.
Topics: Adalimumab; Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Azathioprine; Cyclosporine; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Methotrexate; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Uveitis, Anterior
PubMed: 29049193
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008045 -
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Dec 2014No optimal therapeutic approach has been established for pemphigus. (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
No optimal therapeutic approach has been established for pemphigus.
OBJECTIVE
Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy, steroid-sparing effect, and safety of available treatment modalities.
METHODS
PubMed, LILACS (up to July 2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, issue 5 of 12, May 2014), and the ClinicalTrials.gov registry and reference lists were searched for randomized controlled trials of any treatment modality for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus. Data were extracted independently by two authors using predefined appraisal criteria and data fields.
RESULTS
A total of 20 studies (826 participants) were included. Most were small and open-labeled; all but seven were not concealed for allocation. Owing to the variability in intervention arms, five meta-analyses were performed, each pooling the data of two to three trials. Studies excluded from the meta-analyses were described quantitatively. Azathioprine had a steroid-sparing effect but did not increase remission rate. Mycophenolate mofetil induced sustained remission more quickly than did placebo and delayed time to relapse but did not have a steroid-sparing effect or favorable remission rate. Cyclophosphamide had a steroid-sparing effect, though less than azathioprine, but did not affect the remission rate or time-to-disease control. Intravenous immunoglobulin had more favorable short-term efficacy than did placebo. Topical epidermal growth factor hastened lesion healing.
CONCLUSIONS
Although some of the available therapeutic modalities for pemphigus are beneficial in terms of steroid-sparing, hastening response, or delaying relapse, none were found to increase the complete response rate compared with glucocorticoids alone, currently the mainstay of treatment. Multicenter randomized controlled trials and case control studies with uniform outcome measures are warranted.
Topics: Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Pemphigus; Recurrence; Remission Induction
PubMed: 25403548
DOI: 10.1007/s40257-014-0101-9 -
Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine... Oct 2022To investigate the effectiveness and safety of tripterygium glycosides (TG) tablet for the treatment of Lupus nephritis (LN). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the effectiveness and safety of tripterygium glycosides (TG) tablet for the treatment of Lupus nephritis (LN).
METHODS
Several databases were systematically searched including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Wiley, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, SinoMed and Wanfang Library till June 20, 2020. Revman5.3 was utilized to analyze the data according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement.
RESULTS
In total, 8 randomized controlled trials involving 583 participants were identified. Meta-analyses showed that, compared with glucocorticoids (GC) alone, the combination with TG tablet provided a statistically significant improvement in total remission (TR) ( = 1.27, 95% : 1.08-1.50, = 0.004), complete remission (CR) ( = 1.61, 95% : 1.05-2.47, = 0.03) and C3 levels ( = 0.27, 95% : 0.14-0.39, < 0.000 1), C4 levels ( = 0.12, 95% : 0.07-0.17, < 0.000 01). No significant differences were seen in TR, CR, proteinuria, serum creatinine, C3 and C4 (TR: = 1.00, 95% : 0.87-1.16, = 0.95; CR: = 1.10, 95% : 0.78-1.56, = 0.58; proteinuria levels: = -0.06, 95% : -0.13 to 0.01, = 0.10; serum creatinine levels: = -0.01, 95%: -7.36 to 7.35, = 1.00; C3 levels: = 0.01, 95%: -0.06 to 0.07, = 0.84; C4 levels: = -0.01, 95%: -0.03 to 0.01, = 0.49) between azathioprine (AZA) / leflomit (LEF) + GC and TG tablet + GC. Adverse events (hepatic dysfunction, nausea, vomitting) showed no statistical differences between the TG tablet + GC group and the GC group. There were more new onset of irregular menstruation in the TG tablet + GC group than those in the AZA + GC ( = 3.57, 95% : 1.40-9.11, = 0.008) /LEF+ GC ( = 6.69, 95% : 2.42-18.46, = 0.000 2) group, but leucopenia lower than those in AZA + GC group ( = 0.38, 95% : 0.17-0.85, = 0.02) and alopecia ( = 0.14, 95% : 0.03-0.77, = 0.02) and rash ( = 0.09, 95% : 0.01-0.69, = 0.02) lower than those in LEF + GC group.
CONCLUSIONS
This review indicates that TG tablet maybe effective in LN treatment. Nevertheless, adverse events cannot be ignored. Large sample, multi-center, high-quality clinical studies are needed to verify the exact effects and safety of TG tablet in treatment of LN.
Topics: Creatinine; Female; Glycosides; Humans; Lupus Nephritis; Proteinuria; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tablets; Tripterygium
PubMed: 36083472
DOI: 10.19852/j.cnki.jtcm.2022.05.001 -
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety 2023Pretherapy assessment of specific genetic polymorphism (TPMT, NUDT15, FTO, RUNX1, etc) or enzyme levels (for TPMT) may help personalize the dose of thiopurines and avoid... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Pretherapy assessment of specific genetic polymorphism (TPMT, NUDT15, FTO, RUNX1, etc) or enzyme levels (for TPMT) may help personalize the dose of thiopurines and avoid adverse effects.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing personalized versus standard strategy for initial thiopurine dosing was performed. The electronic databases were searched on 27 September 2022. The outcomes were overall adverse effects, myelotoxicity, drug interruptions, and therapeutic efficacy with either strategy. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE methodology.
RESULTS
We included six randomized trials, done dominantly in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The personalized strategies were genotype testing in 4 trials (TPMT in three trials, NUDT15 in two) and enzyme levels for TPMT in two trials. The pooled risk of myelotoxicity in personalized dosing was lower [RR = 0.72 (95%CI, 0.55-0.94, I = 0%)]. The pooled risk of pancreatitis (RR = 1.10I, 0.78-1.56, I = 0%), hepatotoxicity (RR = 1.13, 0.69-1.88, I = 45), and GI intolerance (RR = 1.01, 0.92-1.10, I = 0) were similar in two groups. The pooled risk of drug interruption in individualized dosing was similar to the standard dosing group (RR = 0.97, I = 68%).
CONCLUSION
Personalized testing-based initial thiopurine dosing is protective against myelotoxicity as compared to standard weight-based dosing.
Topics: Humans; Colitis, Ulcerative; Crohn Disease; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Inflammatory Bowel Diseases; Alpha-Ketoglutarate-Dependent Dioxygenase FTO
PubMed: 37436005
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2023.2236554 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Jun 2014To review pediatric cases of orofacial granulomatosis (OFG), report disease characteristics, and explore the association between OFG and Crohn's disease. (Review)
Review
AIM
To review pediatric cases of orofacial granulomatosis (OFG), report disease characteristics, and explore the association between OFG and Crohn's disease.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched Medline, LILACS, Virtual Health Library, and Web of Knowledge in September 2013 for cases of OFG in the pediatric age range (< 18 years), with no language limitations. All relevant articles were accessed in full text. The manual search included references of retrieved articles. We extracted data on patients' characteristics, disease characteristics, association with other diseases, and treatment. We analyzed the data and reported the results in tables and text.
RESULTS
We retrieved 173 reports of OFG in children. Mean age at onset was 11.1 ± 3.8 years (range: 2.0-18 years). Prevalence in males was significant higher than in females (P < 0.001), with a male:female ratio of 2:1. Gastrointestinal signs or symptoms were present in 26.0% of children at the time of OFG diagnosis. Overall, 70/173 (40.4%) children received a concomitant diagnosis of Crohn's disease. In about half (51.4%) of the cases the onset of OFG anticipated the diagnosis of Crohn's disease, with a mean time between the two diagnoses of 13.1 ± 11.6 mo (range: 3-36 mo). Overall, 21/173 (12.1%) of the children with OFG had perianal disease, while 11/173 (6.4%) had a family history of Crohn's disease. Both perianal disease and a family history of Crohn's disease were significantly associated with a higher risk of Crohn's disease diagnosis in children with OFG [relative risk (RR) = 3.10, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.46-3.90; RR = 2.74, 95%CI: 2.24-3.36, P < 0.0001 for both). Treatment of OFG included steroids (70.8% of children) and other immunosuppressive drugs (42.7%), such as azathioprine, thalidomide and infliximab.
CONCLUSION
High prevalence of Crohn's disease in children with OFG suggests that OFG may be a subtype of Crohn's disease.
Topics: Adolescent; Age of Onset; Child; Child, Preschool; Crohn Disease; Female; Granulomatosis, Orofacial; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Male; Prevalence; Risk Factors; Steroids; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24966621
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7497 -
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Oct 2020Rare diseases (RDs) in rheumatology as a group have a high prevalence, but randomized controlled trials are hampered by their heterogeneity and low individual... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Rare diseases (RDs) in rheumatology as a group have a high prevalence, but randomized controlled trials are hampered by their heterogeneity and low individual prevalence. To survey the current evidence of pharmacotherapies for rare rheumatic diseases, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of RDs in rheumatology for different pharmaco-interventions were included into this meta-analysis if there were two or more trials investigating the same RD and using the same assessment tools or outcome parameters. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and PUBMED were searched up to April 2nd 2020. The overall objective of this study was to identify RCTs of RDs in rheumatology, evaluate the overall quality of these studies, outline the evidence of pharmacotherapy, and summarize recommended therapeutic regimens.
RESULTS
We screened 187 publications, and 50 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. In total, we analyzed data of 13 different RDs. We identified several sources of potential bias, such as a lack of description of blinding methods and allocation concealment, as well as small size of the study population. Meta-analysis was possible for 26 studies covering six RDs: Hunter disease, Behçet's disease, giant cell arteritis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, reactive arthritis, and systemic sclerosis. The pharmacotherapies tested in these studies consisted of immunosuppressants, such as corticosteroids, methotrexate and azathioprine, or biologicals. We found solid evidence for idursulfase as a treatment for Hunter syndrome. In Behçet's disease, apremilast and IF-α showed promising results with regard to total and partial remission, and Tocilizumab with regard to relapse-free remission in giant cell arteritis. Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, and azathioprine were equally effective in ANCA-associated vasculitis, while mepolizumab improved the efficacy of glucocorticoids. The combination of rifampicin and azithromycin showed promising results in reactive arthritis, while there was no convincing evidence for the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in systemic sclerosis.
CONCLUSION
For some diseases such as systemic sclerosis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, or Behcet's disease, higher quality trials were available. These RCTs showed satisfactory efficacies for immunosuppressants or biological drugs, except for systemic sclerosis. More high quality RCTs are urgently warranted for a wide spectrum of RDs in rheumatology.
Topics: Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Methotrexate; Rare Diseases; Rheumatic Diseases; Rituximab
PubMed: 33129321
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-020-01576-5