-
The Journal of Dermatological Treatment Feb 2018Knowledge of effectiveness and safety of the nonbiologic, nonantihistamine treatments used for chronic urticaria is important as in some cases the principal... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Knowledge of effectiveness and safety of the nonbiologic, nonantihistamine treatments used for chronic urticaria is important as in some cases the principal guideline-recommended drug; omalizumab, has limited effect, side effects or is too expensive or unavailable. Herein, we systematically review the evidence for the use of the nonbiologic treatments in antihistamine-refractory chronic urticaria.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed and Webofscience and identified studies that reported use of one or more of the nonbiological, nonantihistamine treatment options for chronic urticaria. The studies were evaluated based on study design, number of patients, effect of treatment and safety.
RESULTS
We identified 118 studies or case series with 13 different treatments (azathioprine, chloroquine, colchicine, cyclosporine, dapsone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), methotrexate, montelukast, mycophenolate mofetil, plasmapheresis, sulfasalazine, tranexamic acid and ultraviolet light (UV) A, UVB) totaling 1682 patients. There was a paucity of controlled trials for most of the treatments reviewed albeit the strongest evidence in favor of a beneficial effect in chronic urticaria was, apart from montelukast and cyclosporine, seen for UV therapy and dapsone followed by IVIG.
CONCLUSION
The treatment options reviewed should be seen as potential alternatives in treatment-resistant chronic urticaria where guideline-based selections have failed. However, larger controlled trials are warranted to advance the level of evidence, possibly supporting some treatments' future recommendation in selected patients.
Topics: Anti-Allergic Agents; Chronic Disease; Cyclosporine; Dapsone; Databases, Factual; Drug Resistance; Histamine Antagonists; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Plasmapheresis; Ultraviolet Therapy; Urticaria
PubMed: 28513247
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2017.1329505 -
The American Journal of Tropical... May 2017AbstractDapsone is a bactericidal and bacteriostatic against , a causative agent of leprosy. Dapsone is also applied in a range of medical fields because of its... (Review)
Review
AbstractDapsone is a bactericidal and bacteriostatic against , a causative agent of leprosy. Dapsone is also applied in a range of medical fields because of its anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Dapsone hypersensitivity syndrome (DHS) is a rare yet serious adverse drug reaction (ADR) caused by dapsone involving multiple organs. We performed a systematic review of published articles describing dapsone-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, including all Chinese articles and the latest literature available in online databases published between October 2009 and October 2015. We determined the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and mortality rate of DHS. Importantly, we also summarized the recent advances in genetic testing allowing prediction of ADRs. In an initial systematic electronic search, we retrieved 191 articles. Subsequently, these articles were further filtered and ultimately 84 articles (60 Chinese case reports, 21 non-Chinese articles, and three epidemiological studies) were selected, which included 877 patients. The prevalence of DHS among Chinese patients was 1.5% with a fatality rate of 9.6%. Early withdrawal of dapsone and appropriate treatment reduced the fatality rate. Most importantly, genetic screening for the HLA-B*13:01 allele among high-risk populations showed a significant utility as a useful genetic marker to DHS. In conclusion, this review discusses the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of DHS among Chinese patients, which may help physicians to understand this syndrome.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Alleles; Child; China; Dapsone; Drug Hypersensitivity; Drug Substitution; Female; Genetic Testing; HLA-B13 Antigen; Humans; Leprostatic Agents; Leprosy; Male; Middle Aged; Mycobacterium leprae; Prevalence; Primary Prevention; Survival Analysis; Syndrome
PubMed: 28167593
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0628 -
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology May 2022Relapsing polychondritis (RP) evolves with variable and intermittent involvement of cartilage and proteoglycan-rich structures. Ocular manifestations are present in up... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
Relapsing polychondritis (RP) evolves with variable and intermittent involvement of cartilage and proteoglycan-rich structures. Ocular manifestations are present in up to two-thirds of RP patients. Necrotising scleritis (NS) and peripheral ulcerative keratitis (PUK) may be inaugural and may lead to eye perforation and vision loss. We aimed to review NS and PUK in RP, in order to characterise them, to identify successful treatment options and unmet needs.
METHODS
A systematic review of the currently available evidence in PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus was performed according to PRISMA, including observational studies, single case reports and case series of NS/PUK in RP. Study design, number of patients, age, gender, treatment and outcome, were extracted. Two RP patients also provided their opinion.
RESULTS
Five case reports and two case series were eligible for inclusion. We identified 10 RP patients with eye-threatening complications (NS and/or PUK), 9 adults (2 males, 7 females, aged 35-72, median age 57.6 years) and one paediatric patient (F, 11 years). Apart from glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide was effective in 4 patients; infliximab, high-dose immunoglobulins, dapsone, or cyclosporine were also successfully employed in a case each. Surgical repair was reported in 2 cases.
CONCLUSIONS
Ocular inflammation is often bilateral and recurring in RP; NS/PUK are rare complications. All patients who develop NS/PUK should be specifically questioned for RP signs and symptoms. Early institution of immunosuppressive therapies is mandatory. Increasing awareness, physicians' and patients' education and a multidisciplinary approach may help improve the prognosis of these serious complications of RP.
Topics: Adult; Child; Corneal Ulcer; Cyclophosphamide; Female; Humans; Infliximab; Male; Middle Aged; Polychondritis, Relapsing; Scleritis
PubMed: 35238768
DOI: 10.55563/clinexprheumatol/27n7im -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2009Discoid lupus erythematosus is a chronic form of cutaneous (skin) lupus which can cause permanent scarring if treatment is inadequate. Many drugs have been used to treat... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Discoid lupus erythematosus is a chronic form of cutaneous (skin) lupus which can cause permanent scarring if treatment is inadequate. Many drugs have been used to treat this disease and some of these are potentially very toxic.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus.
SEARCH STRATEGY
In June 2009 we updated our searches of the Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2009), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and online ongoing trials registers. The reference lists of relevant reviews were searched. Index Medicus (1956 to 1966) was handsearched and we approached authors for information about unpublished trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included all randomised trials of drugs to treat people with discoid lupus erythematosus. Drugs included in the search were azathioprine, chloroquine, clofazimine, corticosteroids, (oral and topical), dapsone, gold, interferon alpha-2a, methotrexate, phenytoin, retinoids, sulphasalazine, thalidomide, topical calcineurin blockers (pimecrolimus and tacrolimus), and biological agents (etanercept, efalizimab, infliximab, and rituximab).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers independently examined each retrieved study for eligibility.
MAIN RESULTS
Two trials involving 136 participants were included. No new trials were included in this update.In a cross-over study of 12 weeks duration, fluocinonide 0.05% cream (a potent topical corticosteroid), appeared to be better than hydrocortisone 1% cream (a mild corticosteroid) when the first arm of the trial involving 78 participants was analysed at 6 weeks. Clearing or excellent improvement was seen in 27% of people using fluocinonide and in 10% of those using hydrocortisone, giving a 17% absolute benefit in favour of fluocinonide (95% CI 0.0 to 0.34, NNT (Number needed to treat) 6).In the second trial, acitretin (50mg/day) was compared with hydroxychloroquine (400mg/day) in 58 people in a parallel trial of 8 weeks duration. There was marked improvement or clearing in 46% of people using acitretin and in 50% of those on hydroxychloroquine but there was no significant difference between the 2 interventions. The adverse effects were more frequent and more severe in the acitretin group. In this trial clearing of erythema was measured and found to be better in the hydroxychloroquine group (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.06).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Fluocinonide cream may be more effective than hydrocortisone in treating people with discoid lupus erythematosus. Hydroxychloroquine and acitretin appear to be of equal efficacy, although adverse effects are more frequent and more severe with acitretin. There is not enough reliable evidence about other drugs used to treat discoid lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Acitretin; Dermatologic Agents; Fluocinonide; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Hydroxychloroquine; Lupus Erythematosus, Discoid; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 19821298
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002954.pub2 -
Journal of the European Academy of... Aug 2015Granuloma annulare (GA) is a benign inflammatory skin disease. Localized GA is likely to resolve spontaneously, while generalized GA (GGA) is rare and may persist for... (Review)
Review
Granuloma annulare (GA) is a benign inflammatory skin disease. Localized GA is likely to resolve spontaneously, while generalized GA (GGA) is rare and may persist for decades. GGA usually is resistant to a variety of therapeutic modalities and takes a chronic course. The objective of this study was to summarize all reported treatments of generalized granuloma annulare. This is a systematic review based on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Central Register search of articles in English and German and a manual search, between 1980 and 2013, to summarize the treatment of generalized granuloma annulare. Most medical literature on treatment of GGA is limited to individual case reports and small series of patients treated without a control group. Randomized controlled clinical studies are missing. Multiple treatment modalities for GGA were reported including topical and systemic steroids, PUVA, isotretinoin, dapsone, pentoxifylline, hydroxychloroquine, cyclosporine, IFN-γ, potassium iodide, nicotinamide, niacinamide, salicylic acid, dipyridamole, PDT, fumaric acid ester, etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab. While there are numerous case reports of successful treatments in the literature including surgical, medical and phototherapy options, well-designed, randomized, controlled clinical trials are required for an evidence-based treatment of GGA.
Topics: Granuloma Annulare; Humans
PubMed: 25651003
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12976 -
La Revue de Medecine Interne Aug 2019Ten to 15% of common variable immunodeficiencies (CVID) develop auto-immune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Treatment is based on...
INTRODUCTION
Ten to 15% of common variable immunodeficiencies (CVID) develop auto-immune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Treatment is based on immunosuppressants, which produce blocking effects in the CVID. Our objective was to assess their risk-benefit ratio in these immunocompromised patients.
METHODS
We identified 17 articles detailing the treatment of AIHA and/or ITP in patients suffering from CVID through a systematic review of the MEDLINE database.
RESULTS
The increased infectious risk with corticosteroids does not call into question their place in the first line of treatment of ITP and AIHA in CVID. High-doses immunoglobulin therapy remain reserved for ITP with a high risk of bleeding. In second-line treatment, rituximab appears to be effective, with a lower infectious risk than the splenectomy. Immunosuppressants (azathioprine, methotrexate, mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, ciclosporine) are moderately effective and often lead to severe infections, meaning that their use is justified only in resistant cases and steroid-sparing. Dapsone, danazol and anti-D immunoglobulins have an unfavorable risk-benefit ratio. The place of TPO receptor agonists is still to be defined. The establishment of immunoglobulin replacement in the place of immunosuppressants (except for short-term corticotherapy) or splenectomy appears to be essential to limit the risk of infections, including in the absence of previous infections.
CONCLUSION
The presence of CVID does not mean that it is necessary to give up on corticosteroids as a first-line treatment and rituximab as a second-line treatment for AIHA and ITP, but it should be in addition to immunoglobulin replacement. A splenectomy should be reserved as a third-line treatment.
Topics: Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune; Common Variable Immunodeficiency; Danazol; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Immunologic Factors; Immunosuppressive Agents; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic; Receptors, Thrombopoietin; Rituximab; Splenectomy
PubMed: 31101329
DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2019.02.006 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2001Discoid lupus erythematosus is a chronic form of cutaneous (skin) lupus which can cause permanent scarring if treatment is inadequate. Many drugs have been used to treat... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Discoid lupus erythematosus is a chronic form of cutaneous (skin) lupus which can cause permanent scarring if treatment is inadequate. Many drugs have been used to treat this disease and some of these are potentially very toxic.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Clinical Trials Register (December 1999), MEDLINE (January 1966 to December 1999), EMBASE (January 1980 to January 2000), and the reference lists of relevant reviews. Index Medicus (1956 to 1966) was handsearched and 7 experts in the field were approached for information about unpublished trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials of drugs to treat people with discoid lupus erythematosus. Drugs included in the search were azathioprine, chloroquine, clofazimine, corticosteroids, (oral and topical), dapsone, gold, interferon alpha-2a, methotrexate, phenytoin, retinoids, sulphasalazine and thalidomide.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers independently examined each retrieved study for eligibility.
MAIN RESULTS
Two trials involving 136 participants were included. In a cross-over study of twelve weeks duration fluocinonide 0.05% cream (a potent topical corticosteroid), appeared to be markedly better than hydrocortisone 1% cream ( a mild corticosteroid). Clearing or excellent improvement was seen in 27% of people using fluocinonide and in 10% of those using hydrocortisone, giving a 17% absolute benefit in favour of fluocinonide (95% CI 4.5 to 29.5% and NNT 6). In the second trial, hydroxychloroquine was compared with acitretin in 58 people. There was marked improvement or clearing in 46% of people using acitretin and in 50% of those on hydroxychloroquine, a nonsignificant 4% absolute gain with hydroxychloroquine (95%CI -23% to 30%). The adverse effects were more frequent and more severe in the acitretin group.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
Fluocinonide cream may be more effective than hydrocortisone in treating people with discoid lupus erythematosus. Hydroxychloroquine and acitretin appear to be of equal efficacy, although adverse effects are more frequent and more severe with acitretin. There is not enough reliable evidence about other drugs used to treat discoid lupus erythematosus.
Topics: Dermatologic Agents; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Discoid; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 11279785
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002954 -
Archives of Dermatology Mar 2002To identify and critically evaluate evidence from randomized controlled trials for the efficacy of treatments for mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP)/cicatricial pemphigoid... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To identify and critically evaluate evidence from randomized controlled trials for the efficacy of treatments for mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP)/cicatricial pemphigoid (CP) and epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA).
SEARCH STRATEGY
Review of MEDLINE from 1966 through March 2000, EMBASE from 1980 through March 2000, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (February 28, 2001) to identify randomized controlled trials for the efficacy of treatments in MMP/CP and EBA.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomized controlled trials of therapeutic interventions that included patients with MMP/CP or EBA confirmed by immunofluorescence study findings. All age groups were included.
RESULTS
We found 2 small randomized controlled trials of MMP/CP, both conducted in patients with severe eye involvement. We were not able to identify a randomized controlled trial of therapeutic interventions in EBA.
CONCLUSIONS
There is evidence from 2 small trials that severe ocular CP responds best to treatment with cyclophosphamide, and mild to moderate disease seems effectively suppressed by treatment with dapsone. No treatment recommendations can be made for EBA because to our knowledge no randomized controlled trials are published. Even though systemic corticosteroids are regarded as the gold standard in the treatment of MMP/CP and EBA, there is poor evidence from the literature that they are the best treatment for these diseases.
Topics: Cyclophosphamide; Dapsone; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Pemphigoid, Benign Mucous Membrane; Prednisone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfur Compounds
PubMed: 11902989
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.138.3.380 -
Annales de Dermatologie Et de... Mar 2011Mucous membrane pemphigoid is a rare autoimmune bullous disorder. Numerous treatment regimens have been proposed in the literature. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Mucous membrane pemphigoid is a rare autoimmune bullous disorder. Numerous treatment regimens have been proposed in the literature.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy and tolerance of treatment regimens proposed in mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), from a systematic review of the literature.
METHODS
Randomized control trials have been identified using the PubMed and Embase databases up to April 2009. Uncontrolled prospective and retrospective studies have also been analyzed.
RESULTS
Literature analysis confirms that clinical and therapeutic trials are very uncommon in MMP; only retrospective series or case reports are available and have been analyzed. Therefore, the level of evidence is usually weak. Twenty-four series have been analyzed in this review. Dapsone remains the first line treatment in non-ocular forms of MMP. Sulfasalazine or cyclins can be used when dapsone is not tolerated or effective. Corticosteroids can be used to control inflammatory flares of the disease. Immunosuppressants are not used as the first line of treatment and can be added to anti-inflammatory drugs for a better control of MMP. Cyclophophamide or mycophenolate mofetil can be used, especially in the elderly. In ocular forms of the disease, the severity and chronicity of ocular involvement is the main therapeutical target. Non-scarring conjunctivitis can be treated by dapsone monotherapy. Ocular flares of the disease can be treated with systemic corticosteroids or cyclophosphamide. Many immunomodulating drugs are under evaluation. Intravenous immunoglobulins, etanercept or rituximab can be proposed when cyclophosphamide is not able to control the disease.
CONCLUSION
Data from the literature did not allow identifying the best therapeutic regimen, mainly because of the lack of prospective comparative studies. Dapsone remains the first line treatment in MMP. Immunosuppressive or immunomodulating drugs should be discussed patient by patient.
Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Combined Modality Therapy; Dapsone; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Immunosuppressive Agents; Immunotherapy; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Pemphigoid, Benign Mucous Membrane; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 21397149
DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2011.01.012 -
Sao Paulo Medical Journal = Revista... 2024Loxosceles spp are arthropods found worldwide. Its bite may produce cutaneous loxoscelism (necrotic or edematous) or cutaneous-visceral loxoscelism. Depending on their...
BACKGROUND
Loxosceles spp are arthropods found worldwide. Its bite may produce cutaneous loxoscelism (necrotic or edematous) or cutaneous-visceral loxoscelism. Depending on their severity and location, cutaneous forms are managed with local cold application and systemic administration of antihistamines, corticosteroids, antibiotics, polymorphonuclear inhibitors, and analgesics.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to report a case of cutaneous loxoscelism and to identify the main dermatological manifestations associated with the Loxosceles spp bite.
DESIGN AND SETTING
This case report and literature review was conducted in a Mexican university.
METHODS
A detailed report on the medical management of a patient with cutaneous loxoscelism treated at the emergency department of a public hospital was published. Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched to identify articles reporting cutaneous loxoscelism. The following keywords were used during the database search: "loxoscelism" OR "spider bite," OR "loxosceles" OR "loxosceles species" OR "loxosceles venom" OR "loxoscelism case report" AND "cutaneous" OR "dermonecrotic arachnidism."
RESULTS
A 62-year-old female patient with cutaneous loxoscelism was treated with systemic dapsone and local heparin spray. Eighteen studies with 22 clinical cases were included in this systematic review. Of the 22 patients, 12 (54.5%) were men. L. rufescens was the predominant spider species.
CONCLUSIONS
The administration of dapsone and heparin for the management of cutaneous loxoscelism demonstrated success in this case, with no sequelae observed. In general, the literature review indicated favorable outcomes in patients treated with antimicrobials and corticosteroids, with continuous healing of skin lesions.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO ID CRD42023422424 (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023422424).
Topics: Female; Male; Humans; Middle Aged; Dapsone; Spider Bites; Hemoglobins; Heparin; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Regeneration
PubMed: 38422241
DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2023.0151.04012023