-
CoDASTo identify the main factors associated with oropharyngeal dysphagia following cardiac surgery through a systematic review of the literature. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To identify the main factors associated with oropharyngeal dysphagia following cardiac surgery through a systematic review of the literature.
METHODS
A bibliographic search was conducted in the PubMed and ScienceDirect databases using the following keywords: "cardiac surgery", "deglutition disorders", and "dysphagia".
SELECTION CRITERIA
Articles published in Portuguese, English, or Spanish addressing oropharyngeal dysphagia following cardiac surgery were selected with no time limitation. Only studies available in full were included.
DATA ANALYSIS
First, articles were screened for title and abstract. Subsequently, they were submitted to full assessment by two blinded referees. The following data were extracted: authors, year of publication, study design, sample size, variables evaluated, and main results.
RESULTS
The main factors related to oropharyngeal dysphagia in post-cardiac surgery were advanced age, presence of comorbidities and other diseases, intubation time, and surgical conditions.
CONCLUSION
The studies showed high heterogeneity, demonstrating that individuals who undergo cardiac surgical procedures, especially the elderly, present several factors related to oropharyngeal dysphagia postoperatively, such as cardiopulmonary bypass, transesophageal echocardiography, associated comorbidities, development of postoperative sepsis, and previous heart conditions.
Topics: Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Deglutition Disorders; Heart Diseases; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Period; Risk Factors
PubMed: 27683826
DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162015199 -
Clinical Otolaryngology : Official... Feb 2016The long-term prognosis of hypopharyngeal cancer is poor. Surgery necessitates pharyngolaryngectomy with flap reconstruction. For such patients, it is important that... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
BACKGROUND
The long-term prognosis of hypopharyngeal cancer is poor. Surgery necessitates pharyngolaryngectomy with flap reconstruction. For such patients, it is important that functional outcomes are preserved to maintain a respectable quality of life.
OBJECTIVE OF REVIEW
To identify the functional outcomes following pharyngolaryngectomy with respect to quality of life, speech and swallow through a systematic review of literature.
SEARCH STRATEGY
Searches of EBM databases and literature databases using key words: pharyngolaryngectomy, laryngopharyngectomy, swallow, dysphagia, speech and dysphonia from 1970 to August 2014. Articles were screened for relevance using pre-determined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
EVALUATION METHOD
Articles reviewed by authors and data compiled in tables for analysis.
RESULTS
No previous systematic reviews assessing functional outcomes were identified. Seventeen studies reported speech outcomes (576 patients) and fifteen reported swallow outcomes (1076 patients). The data suggests that patients who underwent trachea-oesophageal puncture developed more favourable speech outcomes than those rehabilitated using other measures. Overall stricture incidence was 11.4% and 6.5% of patients required long-term enteral nutrition. Four studies used validated speech measures, and three used validated swallow measures. They suggest an overall level of perceived impairment in quality of life. Speech and swallow outcomes were significantly poorer than patients who underwent total laryngectomy.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, there is an impairment in speech and swallow outcomes following pharyngolaryngectomy; however, the exact extent is unclear. There is a need for a general consensus on assessment measures and prospective multicentre studies to be conducted. This study compiles the available data to improve caregiver and patient awareness of functional outcomes.
Topics: Deglutition; Humans; Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms; Laryngectomy; Pharyngectomy; Quality of Life; Speech; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26031311
DOI: 10.1111/coa.12466 -
International Journal of Pediatric... Nov 2020To evaluate outcomes of injection laryngoplasty (IL) and endoscopic surgical repair for the treatment of type 1 laryngeal clefts (LC1) and to determine the most common... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate outcomes of injection laryngoplasty (IL) and endoscopic surgical repair for the treatment of type 1 laryngeal clefts (LC1) and to determine the most common presentations of LC1.
METHODS
Primary studies were searched for in PubMed, Scopus, OVID, and Cochrane Library using search terms laryngeal cleft and laryngotracheoesophageal cleft for articles published from database inception through August 2019. The search identified all articles pertaining to the symptomatology and management of LC1. Meta-analysis was performed on presenting symptoms and improvement of clinical symptoms and swallow function.
RESULTS
Twenty-four studies, comprising 713 patients with a mean age of 33.7 months (range 0-168 months), were included. The most common presenting symptoms were aspiration (80%, CI [55%-96%]), dysphagia (61%, CI [47%-74%]), and choking (57%, CI [37%-76%]). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was the most common comorbidity (68%, CI [51%-83%]) and premature birth comprised 27% [21%-32%] of the patients. Overall, 38% of patients received IL as a primary therapy. Prior to injection, 91% [87%-94%] of patients aspirated on swallow evaluations, and 62% [55%-68%] aspirated post-injection. At an average follow-up time of 6.8 months, 90% [70%-100%] of parents reported symptom improvement. An additional 54% of patients underwent endoscopic surgical repair as primary treatment. The rate of aspiration decreased from 73% [43%-94%] to 28% [13%-46%] after repair. At a mean follow-up of 14.2 months, 80% [67%-91%] reported symptom improvement.
CONCLUSION
A high level of clinical suspicion is necessary to detect LC1 since its most common presenting symptoms overlap with other diseases commonly found in this patient population. Both IL and formal surgical repair were effective in managing LC1.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Congenital Abnormalities; Deglutition Disorders; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Laryngoplasty; Larynx; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 33152963
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110370 -
Pediatric Surgery International Oct 2022Dysphagia is the most common symptom in patients with esophageal atresia (EA) of all ages. There is no study addressing the direct relation between dysphagia and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Dysphagia is the most common symptom in patients with esophageal atresia (EA) of all ages. There is no study addressing the direct relation between dysphagia and surgical results. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to define the relationship between surgical complications and dysphagia in patients with EA.
METHODS
The systematic review was drafted under PRISMA guidelines. Systematic literature search was performed for the period 2000 (Jan) to 2019 (Dec)-20 years-in the databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed. Statistical analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 3.0 software.
RESULTS
Among 767 articles, 486 abstracts were screened for the inclusion criteria. The full-texts of 64 articles were assessed for eligibility. The sub-group analysis could be performed in 4 articles for anastomotic strictures. Heterogeneity was calculated by I statistic as 18,487 and pooled odds ratio was measured under the fixed effect model (Q = 3.68; P = 0.298, I = 18,487). There was no significant relationship with an odds ratio of 1.37 between anastomotic stricture (AS) and dysphagia (95% CI 0.631-2.973, p = 0.426). There was no publication bias for the data (Begg's test, p = 0.496; Egger's tests, p = 0.335).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis did not reveal a significant relationship between AS and dysphagia in children with EA. Since many other factors contribute to dysphagia, comprehensive variable information such as detailed standardized registry systems for rare diseases for pooling analysis is needed regarding other potential factors including surgical complications.
Topics: Child; Deglutition Disorders; Esophageal Atresia; Humans
PubMed: 35902400
DOI: 10.1007/s00383-022-05193-0 -
Acta Bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis Aug 2022We performed a systematic review on the early assessment of swallowing function after cerebrovascular stroke.
PURPOSE
We performed a systematic review on the early assessment of swallowing function after cerebrovascular stroke.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review of the English language literature of the past 20 years was performed regarding swallowing function and cerebrovascular stroke. All articles reporting swallowing evaluation through clinical examination validated scores, and diagnostic tools were included in the summary.
RESULTS
The systematic review of the literature identified 1,768 potentially relevant studies with 7 papers retrieved with a total of 589 stroke dysphagic patients. While at the clinical neurological assessment, The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was more frequently used as a clinical outcome predictor. The Bedside screening approach was carried out in 6 papers to assess patients with probable swallowing disorders. Among the diagnostic tools, seven studies performed the Flexible Fiberoptic Endoscopic evaluation assessing scoring validated system while two papers reported early swallowing outcomes Videofluoroscopic Swallow Study.
CONCLUSIONS
Our systematic review revealed the findings significantly associated with dysphagia in post-cerebrovascular patients. Endoscopic evaluation of swallowing proved to be the most used method in the literature, effective in identifying early predictors of dysphagia. Given the presence of different assessing scores employed and reduced study samples enrolled, further studies with large courts are necessary for a greater significance.
Topics: Deglutition; Deglutition Disorders; Endoscopy; Humans; Stroke
PubMed: 36043981
DOI: 10.23750/abm.v93i4.12135 -
International Journal of... 2015Tongue cancer is known to negatively affect both speech and swallowing function; however this is the first review to report speech-language pathology (SLP) intervention... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Tongue cancer is known to negatively affect both speech and swallowing function; however this is the first review to report speech-language pathology (SLP) intervention for both functions following partial glossectomy.
METHOD
Using a PRISMA approach, systematic screening of nine databases was undertaken. Original studies reporting SLP rehabilitation for speech and/or swallowing dysfunction with participants following partial glossectomy as primary cancer treatment were included.
RESULT
These studies are discussed in terms of SLP assessment and intervention trends as well as quality according to current research method standards (levels of evidence, Pedro-P, SCED) in order to determine suitability for guiding current clinical practice.
CONCLUSION
Publications were few (n = 7) and mostly of non-experimental design. This review highlights the gap in evidence and questions the rationale of current SLP rehabilitation following partial glossectomy.
Topics: Deglutition Disorders; Glossectomy; Humans; Speech Disorders; Speech-Language Pathology; Tongue Neoplasms
PubMed: 25515427
DOI: 10.3109/17549507.2014.979880 -
European Journal of Gastroenterology &... Sep 2021The involvement of hydrochloric acid in the etiology of eosinophilic esophagitis and numerous reports on its coexistence and interaction with reflux disease, as well as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE
The involvement of hydrochloric acid in the etiology of eosinophilic esophagitis and numerous reports on its coexistence and interaction with reflux disease, as well as the rings of the esophageal mucosa formed with the advancement of the disease, suggest a potential association of eosinophilic esophagitis with another disorder of esophageal morphology potentially caused by exposure to acid reflux-Schatzki ring. Therefore, it seems reasonable to check the relationship of eosinophilic esophagitis with the coexistence of the Schatzki ring as a potential effect of advanced esophageal trachealization, which is the subject of this systematic review with a meta-analysis.
METHODS
The protocol of this meta-analysis was performed according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. A systematic search of the indexed literature in the MEDLINE and Scopus databases from early to December 2019 was performed to identify all original research articles on the association between the occurrence of the Schatzki ring and eosinophilic esophagitis in adults.
RESULTS
Out of 68 searched studies, after the analysis and evaluation of the works, only 4 met the criteria set according to the protocol and were included in the meta-analysis. Based on the performed meta-analysis, no relationship was found between the occurrence of Schatzki ring and eosinophilic esophagitis.
CONCLUSION
The present study did not show a significant relationship between the occurrence of the Schatzki ring and eosinophilic esophagitis in the adult population, which suggests that these are two independent causes of dysphagia in this patient population.
Topics: Adult; Deglutition Disorders; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophagitis; Esophagitis, Peptic; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Humans
PubMed: 33470703
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002067 -
Journal of Advanced Nursing Jul 2018To identify effective treatments and risk factors associated with death rattle in adults at the end of life. (Review)
Review
AIM
To identify effective treatments and risk factors associated with death rattle in adults at the end of life.
BACKGROUND
The presence of noisy, pooled respiratory tract secretions is among the most common symptoms in dying patients around the world. It is unknown if "death rattle" distresses patients, but it can distress relatives and clinicians. Treatments appear unsatisfactory, so prophylaxis would be ideal if possible.
DESIGN
Quantitative systematic review and narrative summary following Cochrane Collaboration guidelines.
DATA SOURCES
CINAHL, MEDLINE, Health Source Nursing and Web of Science were searched for international literature in any language published from 1993 - 2016 using MeSH headings and iterative interchangeable terms for "death rattle".
REVIEW METHODS
Randomized controlled trials were appraised using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. Non-randomized studies were assessed using ROBINS-I tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. Instances of treatment and risk were extracted and relevant key findings extracted in line with Cochrane methods.
RESULTS
Five randomized trials and 23 non-randomized studies were analysed. No pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatment was found superior to placebo. There was a weak association between lung or brain metastases and presence of death rattle, but otherwise inconsistent empirical support for a range of potential risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS
Clinicians have no clear evidence to follow in either treating death rattle or preventing it occurring. However, several risk factors look promising candidates for prospective analysis, so this review concludes with clear recommendations for further research.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Cholinergic Antagonists; Consciousness; Cough; Deglutition Disorders; Female; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Patient Positioning; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Respiratory Sounds; Respiratory System; Respiratory System Agents; Respiratory Tract Infections; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Water-Electrolyte Balance
PubMed: 29495089
DOI: 10.1111/jan.13557 -
Dysphagia Apr 2024To determine the global prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in adults. Six electronic databases (Embase, LILACS, LIVIVO, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
To determine the global prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in adults. Six electronic databases (Embase, LILACS, LIVIVO, PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched, in addition to gray literature (ASHA, Google Scholar, ProQuest Dissertation, and Theses). A random-effects model for meta-analysis of proportions was conducted, and heterogeneity was evaluated according to the moderator variable through subgroup analysis and meta-regression. The risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool. Thirty papers were included for qualitative and quantitative synthesis. The combined prevalence estimate was 60% [CI 95% = 50%-70%; I = 95%], accounting for different baseline conditions. However, the wide variation that exists between the different baseline conditions (underlying disease or risk factor) tended to overestimate this prevalence when considering the general population. Only one study evaluated healthy individuals, which showed a prevalence of 31% [CI95% = 27%-36%]. The risk of bias was considered low for all studies. None of the variables were considered predictors for the observed variance between the effect sizes of the included studies. For the prevalence of OD, the GRADE rating was considered very low. Despite the high prevalence observed, with over half of the individuals affected, the evidence regarding this outcome remains uncertain due to an overestimation of the generated estimates caused by the baseline condition of the sample.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Deglutition Disorders; Prevalence
PubMed: 37610669
DOI: 10.1007/s00455-023-10608-8 -
Journal of Advanced Nursing Nov 2016The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the water swallow test for screening aspirations in stroke patients. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIM
The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the water swallow test for screening aspirations in stroke patients.
BACKGROUND
The water swallow test is a simple bedside screening tool for aspiration among stroke patients in nursing practice, but results from different studies have not been combined before.
DESIGN
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to provide a synthetic and critical appraisal of the included studies.
DATA SOURCES
Electronic literature in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and other sources were searched systemically in this study. Databases and registers were searched from inception up to 30 April 2015.
REVIEW METHODS
This systematic review was conducted using the recommendations from Cochrane Collaboration for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. Bivariate random-effects models were used to estimate the diagnostic accuracy across those studies. The tool named Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to evaluate the quality of the studies.
RESULTS
There were 770 stroke patients in the 11 studies for the meta-analysis. The water swallow test had sensitivities between 64-79% and specificities between 61-81%. Meta-regression analysis indicated that increasing water volume resulted in higher sensitivity but lower specificity of the water swallow test.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review showed that the water swallow test was a useful screening tool for aspiration among stroke patients. The test accuracy was related to the water volume and a 3-oz water swallow test was recommended for aspiration screening in stroke patients.
Topics: Deglutition; Deglutition Disorders; Humans; Pneumonia, Aspiration; Sensitivity and Specificity; Stroke; Water
PubMed: 27237447
DOI: 10.1111/jan.13013