-
Zirconia dental implants; the relationship between design and clinical outcome: A systematic review.Journal of Dentistry Apr 2024To evaluate the clinical outcome of different designs of zirconia dental implants. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the clinical outcome of different designs of zirconia dental implants.
DATA
This systematic review adhered to the PRISMA checklist and followed the PICO framework. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022337228).
SOURCES
The search was conducted in March 2023 through four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar) along with a search of references in the related reviews. Three authors reviewed on title, and abstract level and analysed the risk of bias, and all authors reviewed on a full-text level.
STUDY SELECTION
Clinical studies excluding case reports for patients treated with different designs of zirconia dental implants were included. From a total of 2728 titles, 71 full-text studies were screened, and 27 studies were included to assess the risk of bias (ROBINS-I tool) and data extraction. After quality assessment, four studies were included, and the remaining 23 excluded studies were narratively described.
RESULT
The included prospective studies with moderate risk of bias reported success and survival rates of one-piece implants that ranged between 95 and 98.4 % with no difference between different lengths and diameters. The acid-etched roughened surface showed higher clinical outcomes compared to other surface roughness designs.
CONCLUSION
Promising 5-year clinical outcomes were found for one-piece zirconia implants with no difference between different diameters and lengths. Concerning surface roughness, better outcomes were found when using the acid-etched implant surface. However, due to the limited available studies, further high-quality clinical studies comparing zirconia one-piece and two-piece implants with different diameters, lengths, and surface roughness are needed.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Based on this systematic review, under suitable clinical situations, the one-piece zirconia implants with diameters of 4.0 mm, 4.5 mm, or 5.5 mm and lengths of 8 mm, 10 mm, 12 mm, or 14 mm have similar promising clinical outcomes. Additionally, the acid-etched roughened implant surface may be preferable.
Topics: Humans; Dental Implants; Dental Materials; Prospective Studies; Dental Restoration Failure; Dental Prosthesis Design; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Zirconium
PubMed: 38437977
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104903 -
PloS One 2018Provisional restorations represent an important phase during the rehabilitation process, knowledge of the mechanical properties of the available materials allows us to... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Provisional restorations represent an important phase during the rehabilitation process, knowledge of the mechanical properties of the available materials allows us to predict their clinical performance. At present, there is no systematic review, which supports the clinicians' criteria, in the selection of a specific material over another for a particular clinical situation. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess and compare the mechanical properties of dimethacrylates and monomethacrylates used in fabricating direct provisional restorations, in terms of flexural strength, fracture toughness and hardness. This review followed the PRISMA guidelines. The searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, the New York Academy of Medicine Grey Literature Report and were complemented by hand-searching, with no limitation of time or language up to January 10, 2017. Studies that assess and compare the mechanical properties of dimethacrylate- and monomethacrylate-based provisional restoration materials were selected. A quality assessment of full-text articles were performed according to modified ARRIVE and CONSORT criteria and modified Cochrane Collaboration's tool for in vitro studies. Initially, 256 articles were identified. After removing the duplicates and applying the selection criteria, 24 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis and 7 were included in the quantitative synthesis (meta-analysis). It may be concluded that dimethacrylate-based provisional restorations presented better mechanical behavior than monomethacrylate-based ones in terms of flexural strength and hardness. Fracture toughness showed no significant differences. Within the monomethacrylate group, polymethylmethacrylate showed greater flexural strength than polyethylmethacrylate.
Topics: Dental Materials; Humans; Materials Testing; Polymethacrylic Acids; Stress, Mechanical
PubMed: 29489883
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193162 -
The International Journal of... 2010The focus of this systematic review was to assess the published data concerning zirconia dental implant abutments from various aspects. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The focus of this systematic review was to assess the published data concerning zirconia dental implant abutments from various aspects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
To identify suitable literature, an electronic search was performed using PubMed. The keywords "zirconia," "zirconium," "ceramic," "dental abutments," "dental implants," "plaque," and "bacteria" were included. Titles and abstracts were screened, and literature that fulfilled the inclusion criteria was selected for a full-text reading. Articles were divided into four groups: (1) studies on the mechanical properties of zirconia abutments, (2) studies on the peri-implant soft tissues around zirconia abutments, (3) studies on plaque accumulation on zirconia, and (4) clinical studies on the survival of zirconia abutments.
RESULTS
The initial literature search resulted in 380 articles. For groups 1 to 4, 11, 4, 7, and 3 articles satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria, respectively. Only 1 randomized clinical study was identified. Review of the selected articles showed that zirconia abutments were reliable in the anterior region from both biologic and mechanical points of view. Furthermore, zirconia abutments may represent a material surface less attractive for early plaque retention compared to titanium. Three clinical follow-up studies indicated that zirconia abutments could function without fracture and peri-implant lesions.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the reviewed literature, zirconia has the potential to be used as a dental abutment material, although some issues have to be studied further.
Topics: Dental Abutments; Dental Implants; Dental Materials; Dental Plaque; Dental Prosthesis Design; Humans; Mechanical Phenomena; Periodontium; Survival Analysis; Zirconium
PubMed: 20617217
DOI: No ID Found -
The International Journal of... 2015Titanium dental implants have a high success rate; however, there are instances when a modified surface may be desirable. The aim of this article was to systematically... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Titanium dental implants have a high success rate; however, there are instances when a modified surface may be desirable. The aim of this article was to systematically review the different types of implant coatings that have been studied clinically, in vivo and in vitro, and the coating techniques being implemented.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The literature was searched electronically and manually through The Cochrane Library, Medline, and PubMed databases to identify articles studying dental implant surfaces and coating techniques. The database search strategy revealed 320 articles, of which 52 articles were considered eligible--40 in relation to implant coatings and 12 to the coating technique. An additional 30 articles were retrieved by hand search.
RESULTS
Several materials were identified as possible candidates for dental implant coatings; these include carbon, bisphosphonates, bone stimulating factors, bioactive glass and bioactive ceramics, fluoride, hydroxyapatite (HA) and calcium phosphate, and titanium/titanium nitride. HA coatings still remain the most biocompatible coatings even though the more innovative bioglass suggests promising results. The most common coating techniques are plasma spraying and hydrocoating. More recent techniques such as the nanoscale technology are also discussed.
CONCLUSIONS
Several implant coatings have been proposed, and some appear to give better clinical results and improved properties than others. Clinical trials are still required to provide compelling evidence-based results for their long-term successful outcomes.
Topics: Coated Materials, Biocompatible; Dental Implants; Dental Materials; Dental Prosthesis Design; Electrochemical Techniques; Humans; Plasma Gases; Surface Properties
PubMed: 25588174
DOI: 10.11607/ijp.4124 -
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica May 2010The aims of this literature review are to provide answers to questions on how to improve bonding between titanium and dental porcelain and how to further implement, in... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
OBJECTIVES
The aims of this literature review are to provide answers to questions on how to improve bonding between titanium and dental porcelain and how to further implement, in clinical practice, ceramic-veneered titanium as an alternative to conventional metal-ceramic systems.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A literature search of PubMed and also among referenced published scientific papers was performed and 24 fulfilled the search criteria, namely mentions of titanium, ceramics and bond strength. These papers were compiled for comparison and evaluated regarding the bond strength achieved with different methods.
RESULTS
The results strongly indicate that there are possibilities to improve both the present materials and methods for titanium-ceramic veneering.
CONCLUSIONS
The results indicate that present knowledge is sufficient to conclude that veneering titanium with low-fused porcelain for crowns and fixed partial dentures can be recommended for routine clinical use.
Topics: Dental Bonding; Dental Porcelain; Dental Stress Analysis; Dental Veneers; Metal Ceramic Alloys; Surface Properties; Titanium
PubMed: 20095949
DOI: 10.3109/00016350903575260 -
Clinical Oral Implants Research Sep 2023For the present review, the following focused question was addressed: In patients with root-analog dental implants, what is the effect of implants made of other... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
For the present review, the following focused question was addressed: In patients with root-analog dental implants, what is the effect of implants made of other materials than titanium (alloy) on implant survival, marginal bone loss (MBL), and technical and biological complications after at least 5 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An electronic (Medline, Embase, Web of Science) search was performed to identify observational clinical studies published from January 2000 investigating a minimum of 20 commercially available zirconia implants with a mean follow-up of at least 60 months. Primary outcome was implant survival, secondary outcomes included peri-implant MBL, probing depths (PDs), and technical and biological complications. Meta-analyses were performed to evaluate implant survival, MBL, and PD.
RESULTS
From 5129 titles, 580 abstracts were selected, and 111 full-text articles were screened. Finally, 4 prospective and 2 retrospective observational clinical cohort studies were included for data extraction. Meta-analyses estimated after 5 years of loading mean values of 97.2% (95% CI 94.7-99.1) for survival (277 implants, 221 patients), 1.1 mm (95% CI: 0.9-1.3) for MBL (229 implants, 173 patients), and 3.0 mm (95% CI 2.5-3.4) for PDs (231 implants, 175 patients).
CONCLUSIONS
After 5 years, commercially available zirconia implants showed reliable clinical performance based on survival rates, MBL, and PD values. However, more well-designed prospective clinical studies and randomized clinical trials investigating titanium and zirconia implants are needed to confirm the presently evaluated promising outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Dental Implants; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Titanium; Bone Diseases, Metabolic
PubMed: 37750521
DOI: 10.1111/clr.14133 -
European Journal of Oral Implantology 2018A large variety of dental materials are available for the production of implant-supported fixed restorations. Materials with different properties are likely to behave...
AIM
A large variety of dental materials are available for the production of implant-supported fixed restorations. Materials with different properties are likely to behave differently during clinical function, which may result in different prevalence and types of complications. The aim of the present review was to summarise, analyse and discuss the prevalence and types of complications or failures related to dental materials in implant-supported restorations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A strategy was set up using the PICO format and the search was performed using the PubMed database, including a hand search of reference lists. Two independent reviewers selected papers based on a set of criteria. The number of events of complications was summarised.
RESULTS
The initial search produced 2764 titles. After application of criteria, 47 publications were selected for analysis. Seventeen studies reported on 1447 single crowns and 30 studies reported on 2190 fixed dental prostheses. The most common complications were fracture or chipping of the veneer material, loss of retention and lost access hole fillings. Due to the heterogeneity of studies, and large variation in number of restorations per material group, no conclusive correlation between type of material and type of technical complication and/or failure could be established.
CONCLUSIONS
The review did not succeed in providing convincing evidence to answer the question concerning a possible relationship between restoration materials and prevalence of technical complications in implant-supported restorations.
Topics: Crowns; Dental Implants; Dental Materials; Dental Prosthesis Design; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dental Restoration Failure; Denture, Partial, Fixed; Humans
PubMed: 30109306
DOI: No ID Found -
Journal of Dentistry Apr 2017The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the survival and complication rates of inlay-retainer fixed dental prostheses (IRFDPs). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the survival and complication rates of inlay-retainer fixed dental prostheses (IRFDPs).
DATA/SOURCES
A systematic search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases in English and time filters (articles published from 1960) were used.
STUDY SELECTION
Randomized controlled trails (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs) and prospective cohort studies on IRFDPs with a mean follow-up period of at least 2 years were included. Among 501 screened articles, one RCT and ten prospective cohort studies were included in this study. Of the included studies, information on failure and complications was independently extracted by two reviewers in duplicate. The failure and complication rates of IRFDPs were pooled with a random effect model and Poisson regression was applied to further investigate the influence of framework materials. The estimated 3- and 5-year survival rates of IRFDPs were 92.6% (95% CI: 85.8-97.6%) and 87.9% (95% CI: 77.4-96.1%), respectively. Debonding, fracture, dentine hypersensitivity and secondary caries were primary complications. The estimated 5-year rates of debonding, veneer fracture and secondary caries were 5.3%, 15.2% and 2.7%, respectively. Additionally, fiber-reinforced composite IRFDPs exhibited a lower incidence of debonding and caries with a higher rate of veneer fracture compared with metal-based and all-ceramic IRFDPs (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with conventional fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported single crowns (ISCs), IRFDPs exhibited an acceptable 3-year survival rate but higher complication rates of debonding and veneer fracture.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
IRFDPs can be recommended as viable short- or middle-term minimally invasive alternatives to short-span conventional FDPs and ISCs, while the clinical outcome of IRFDPs as long-term definitive restorations still calls for further research. The indications of IRFDPs should be strictly controlled and monitored.
Topics: Ceramics; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Crowns; Databases, Factual; Dental Abutments; Dental Alloys; Dental Materials; Dental Prosthesis Design; Dental Prosthesis Retention; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported; Dental Restoration Failure; Dental Veneers; Denture, Partial, Fixed; Denture, Partial, Fixed, Resin-Bonded; Humans; Inlays; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28212978
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.006 -
International Journal of Oral and... Jul 2016The use of titanium implants is well documented and they have high survival and success rates. However, when used as reduced-diameter implants, the risk of fracture is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The use of titanium implants is well documented and they have high survival and success rates. However, when used as reduced-diameter implants, the risk of fracture is increased. Narrow diameter implants (NDIs) of titanium-zirconium (Ti-Zr) alloy have recently been developed (Roxolid; Institut Straumann AG). Ti-Zr alloys (two highly biocompatible materials) demonstrate higher tensile strength than commercially pure titanium. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the existing clinical evidence on dental NDIs made from Ti-Zr. A systematic literature search was performed using the Medline database to find relevant articles on clinical studies published in the English language up to December 2014. Nine clinical studies using Ti-Zr implants were identified. Overall, 607 patients received 922 implants. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.36±0.06mm after 1 year and 0.41±0.09mm after 2 years. The follow-up period ranged from 3 to 36 months. Mean survival and success rates were 98.4% and 97.8% at 1 year after implant placement and 97.7% and 97.3% at 2 years. Narrow diameter Ti-Zr dental implants show survival and success rates comparable to regular diameter titanium implants (>95%) in the short term. Long-term follow-up clinical data are needed to confirm the excellent clinical performance of these implants.
Topics: Dental Alloys; Dental Implants; Dental Prosthesis Design; Humans; Materials Testing; Tensile Strength; Titanium; Zirconium
PubMed: 26852292
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.01.004 -
Journal of Prosthodontics : Official... Jan 2016To evaluate the current scientific evidence on patient recall and maintenance of dental restorations on natural teeth, standardize patient care regimens, and improve... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To evaluate the current scientific evidence on patient recall and maintenance of dental restorations on natural teeth, standardize patient care regimens, and improve maintenance of oral health. An additional purpose was to examine areas of deficiency in the current scientific literature and provide recommendations for future studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
An electronic search for articles in the English language literature from the past 15 years was performed independently by multiple investigators using a systematic search process. After application of predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the final list of articles was reviewed in depth to meet the objectives of this review.
RESULTS
The initial electronic search resulted in 2161 titles. The systematic application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in 12 articles that met the objectives of the study. An additional 4 articles were added through a supplemental search process for a total of 16 studies. Out of these, 9 were randomized controlled clinical trials and 7 were observational studies. The majority of the studies (14 out of 16) were conducted in the past 5 years, and most of the studies were conducted in Europe (10). Results from the qualitative data, on a combined 3569 patients, indicated that outcome improvements in recall and maintenance regimen were related to (1) patient/treatment characteristics (adherence to recall appointments, type of restoration and type of restorative material); (2) agent (chlorhexidine, fluoride, triclosan); and (3) professional interventions (repeated oral hygiene instruction, regular oral hygiene intervention).
CONCLUSIONS
There is minimal evidence related to recall regimens in patients with removable and fixed tooth-borne restorations; however, there is considerable evidence indicating that patients with tooth-borne removable and fixed restorations require lifelong dental professional maintenance to provide repeated oral hygiene instruction and regular oral hygiene intervention customized to each patient's treatment. Current evidence also indicates that use of specific oral topical agents like chlorhexidine, fluoride, and triclosan can aid in reducing risk for gingival inflammation, dental caries, and candidiasis. Therefore, these agents may aid in improvement of professional and at-home maintenance of various tooth-borne dental restorations. Furthermore, due to the heterogeneity of patient populations, restorations, and treatment needs, the evidence compels forethought of creating clinical practice guidelines for recall and maintenance of patients with tooth-borne dental restorations.
Topics: Dental Care; Dental Caries; Dental Implants; Europe; Humans
PubMed: 26711218
DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12417