-
The Journal of Laryngology and Otology Jul 2017Acellular dermal matrices are increasingly used in laryngotracheal and pharyngeal reconstruction, but specific indications and the type of acellular dermal matrix used... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Acellular dermal matrices are increasingly used in laryngotracheal and pharyngeal reconstruction, but specific indications and the type of acellular dermal matrix used vary. The authors systematically reviewed outcomes relating to acellular dermal matrix use in head and neck reconstruction.
METHODS
Electronic databases were searched through 1 May 2016 for literature on acellular dermal matrix use in laryngotracheal and pharyngeal reconstruction. Studies were appraised for surgical indications, outcomes and study design.
RESULTS
Eleven publications with 170 cases were included. Eight articles reported on acellular dermal matrix use in oncological reconstruction. Most studies were case series; no high-level evidence studies were identified. Graft extrusion was more common in non-oncological applications. In general, post-oncological reconstruction with an acellular dermal matrix demonstrated complication rates similar to those reported without an acellular dermal matrix.
CONCLUSION
Evidence in support of acellular dermal matrix use in head and neck reconstruction is generally poor. Prospective comparative studies are required to define the indications, safety and effectiveness of acellular dermal matrices in laryngotracheal and pharyngeal reconstruction.
Topics: Acellular Dermis; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cervicoplasty; Follow-Up Studies; Laryngeal Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Otorhinolaryngologic Neoplasms; Pharyngeal Neoplasms; Surgical Flaps; Tracheal Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28502275
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215117001049 -
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Aug 2023There is a paucity of evidence comparing the safety of prepectoral and partial subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrices (ADM). We... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
There is a paucity of evidence comparing the safety of prepectoral and partial subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrices (ADM). We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the postoperative complications of the two approaches.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched to retrieve relevant articles. The rates of the complications were, respectively, pooled, and relative risk (RR) was estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to compare the incidence between the two cohorts.
RESULTS
Ten articles reporting on 2667 breast reconstructions were eligible. The hematoma rate was lower in the prepectoral group (RR = 0.590, 95% CI 0.351-0.992). No significant difference was observed in terms of seroma (RR = 1.079, 95% CI 0.489-2.381), skin flap necrosis (RR = 0.936, 95% CI 0.587-1.493), infection (RR = 0.985, 95% CI 0.706-1.375), tissue expander/implant explantation (RR = 0.741, 95% CI 0.506-1.085), wound dehiscence (RR = 1.272, 95% CI 0.605-2.673), capsular contracture (RR = 0.939, 95% CI 0.678-1.300) and rippling (RR = 2.485, 95% CI 0.986-6.261). The RR of animation deformity for the prepectoral group compared with the subpectoral group was 0.040 (95% CI, 0.002-0.853).
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review suggested that with appropriate patient selection, prepectoral breast reconstruction could avoid animation deformity without incurring higher risk of early wound complications, capsular contracture or rippling than partial subpectoral breast reconstruction. Plastic surgeons should complete a comprehensive assessment of the patients before choosing appropriate surgical approaches in clinical practice.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Implants; Acellular Dermis; Mammaplasty; Postoperative Complications; Contracture; Breast Implantation; Breast Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36947180
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03296-0 -
International Urogynecology Journal Dec 2020Er:YAG laser is frequently used in dermatology and gynecology. Clinical studies document high satisfaction rates; however, hard data on the effects at the structural and... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS
Er:YAG laser is frequently used in dermatology and gynecology. Clinical studies document high satisfaction rates; however, hard data on the effects at the structural and molecular levels are limited. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize current knowledge about the objective effects of non-ablative Er:YAG laser on the skin and vaginal wall.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and the Web of Science. Studies investigating objectively measured effects of non-ablative Er:YAG laser on the skin or vaginal wall were included. Studies of any design were included. Owing to the lack of methodological uniformity, no meta-analysis could be performed and therefore results are presented as a narrative review.
RESULTS
We identified in vitro or ex vivo studies on human cells or tissues, studies in rats, and clinical studies. Most studies were on the skin (n = 11); the rest were on the vagina (n = 4). The quality of studies is limited and the settings of the laser were very diverse. Although the methods used were not comparable, there were demonstrable effects in all studies. Immediately after application the increase in superficial temperature, partial preservation of epithelium and subepithelial extracellular matrix coagulation were documented. Later, an increase in epithelial thickness, inflammatory response, fibroblast proliferation, an increase in the amount of collagen, and vascularization were described.
CONCLUSIONS
Er:YAG laser energy may induce changes in the deeper skin or vaginal wall, without causing unwanted epithelial ablation. Laser energy initiates a process of cell activation, production of extracellular matrix, and tissue remodeling.
Topics: Animals; Female; Laser Therapy; Lasers, Solid-State; Rats; Skin; Vagina
PubMed: 32780174
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-020-04452-9 -
Archives of Dermatological Research Jan 2018Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune skin disease of blistering character. The underlying pathophysiological mechanism involves an immune attack,... (Review)
Review
Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune skin disease of blistering character. The underlying pathophysiological mechanism involves an immune attack, usually by IgG class autoantibodies, on the autoantigen BP 180/BPAg2, which is a type XVII collagen (COL17) protein acting as the adhesion molecule between the epidermis and the basement membrane of the dermis. About 40 years ago, following consistent findings of elevated total serum IgE levels in BP patients, it was hypothesized that IgE may be involved in the pathophysiology of BP. Our objective was to determine whether there is strong evidence for an association between IgE class autoantibodies and the clinical severity or phenotype of BP. Three databases were searched for relevant studies and appropriate exclusion and inclusion criteria were applied. Data was extracted and assessed in relation to the study questions concerning the clinical significance of IgE autoantibodies in BP. Nine studies found that anti-BP180 autoantibodies of IgE class are associated with increased severity of BP, whereas two studies did not find such an association. The number of studies which found an association between higher IgE autoantibody levels and the erythematous urticarial phenotype of BP (5) was equal in number to the studies which found no such association (5). In conclusion, higher serum IgE autoantibody levels are associated with more severe clinical manifestations of BP. There is insufficient evidence to support higher IgE autoantibody levels being associated with specific clinical phenotypes of BP.
Topics: Autoantibodies; Humans; Immunoglobulin E; Pemphigoid, Bullous; Phenotype; Severity of Illness Index
PubMed: 29071428
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-017-1789-1 -
JAMA Surgery Apr 2016Expensive biological mesh materials are increasingly used to reinforce abdominal wall hernia repairs. The clinical and cost benefit of these materials are unknown. (Review)
Review
IMPORTANCE
Expensive biological mesh materials are increasingly used to reinforce abdominal wall hernia repairs. The clinical and cost benefit of these materials are unknown.
OBJECTIVES
To review the published evidence on the use of biological mesh materials and to examine the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval history for these devices.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION
Search of multiple electronic databases (Ovid, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database) to identify articles published between 1948 and June 30, 2015, on the use of biological mesh materials used to reinforce abdominal wall hernia repair. Keywords searched included surgical mesh, abdominal hernia, recurrence, infection, fistula, bioprosthesis, biocompatible materials, absorbable implants, dermis, and collagen. The FDA online database for 510(k) clearances was reviewed for all commercially available biological mesh materials. The median national price for mesh materials was established by a benchmarking query through several Integrated Delivery Network and Group Purchasing Organization tools.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS
Of 274 screened articles, 20 met the search criteria. Most were case series that reported results of convenience samples of patients at single institutions with a variety of clinical problems. Only 3 of the 20 were comparative studies. There were no randomized clinical trials. In total, outcomes for 1033 patients were described. Studies varied widely in follow-up time, operative technique, meshes used, and patient selection criteria. Reported outcomes and clinical outcomes, such as fistula formation and infection, were inconsistently reported across studies. Conflicts of interest were not reported in 16 of the 20 studies. Recurrence rates ranged from 0% to 80%. All biological mesh devices were approved by the FDA based on substantial equivalence to a group of nonbiological predicate devices that, on average, were one-third less costly.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
There is insufficient evidence to determine the extra costs associated with or the clinical efficacy of biological mesh materials for the repair of abdominal wall hernia.
Topics: Bioprosthesis; Hernia, Abdominal; Herniorrhaphy; Humans; Prosthesis Design; Surgical Mesh; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Wound Healing
PubMed: 26819222
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5234 -
Plastic Surgery International 2014The increasing use of commercially available acellular dermis matrices for postmastectomy breast reconstruction seems to have simplified the surgical procedure and... (Review)
Review
The increasing use of commercially available acellular dermis matrices for postmastectomy breast reconstruction seems to have simplified the surgical procedure and enhanced the outcome. These materials, generally considered to be highly safe or with only minor contraindications due to the necessary manipulation in preparatory phases, allow an easier one-phase surgical procedure, in comparison with autologous flaps, offering a high patient satisfaction. Unfortunately, the claim for a higher rate of complications associated with irradiation at the implant site, especially when the radiation therapy was given before the reconstructive surgery, suggested a careful behaviour when this technique is preferred. However, this hypothesis was never submitted to a crucial test, and data supporting it are often discordant or incomplete. To provide a comprehensive analysis of the field, we searched and systematically reviewed papers published after year 2005 and registered clinical trials. On the basis of a meta-analysis of data, we conclude that the negative effect of the radiotherapy on the breast reconstruction seems to be evident even in the case of acellular dermis matrices aided surgery. However, more trials are needed to make solid conclusions and clarify the poor comprehension of all the factors negatively influencing outcome.
PubMed: 24987526
DOI: 10.1155/2014/472604 -
Mycoses Apr 2021Dermatophyte infections usually present as various types of superficial cutaneous mycoses; on very rare occasions, dermatophytes enter deep into the dermis and cause...
Dermatophyte infections usually present as various types of superficial cutaneous mycoses; on very rare occasions, dermatophytes enter deep into the dermis and cause invasive infections. In this study, we aimed to perform a systematic review of all reported invasive dermatophytosis cases over the past 20 years. We performed systematic searches in PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science and identified 123 papers reporting 160 individual cases of invasive dermatophytosis between 2000 and 2020. Our study included 103 (64.4%) males, and the mean age at diagnosis was 43.0 years (range: 3-87 years). The most common predisposing factor was superficial dermatophytosis (56.9%), followed by solid organ transplantation (26.9%), the use of topical immunosuppressants (15.6%), gene mutations (14.4%), diabetes (14.4%) and trauma (6.9%). Trichophyton (T.) rubrum was the most prevalent pathogen (53.1%) responsible for invasive dermatophytosis, followed by T. mentagrophytes (7.5%), Microsporum canis (6.9%), T. tonsurans (5.6%), T. interdigitale (5.0%) and T. violaceum (3.8%). Patients with CARD9 or STAT3 mutations were prone to have mixed infection of two or more dermatophytes, present with eosinophilia and high IgE, and develop disseminated infections. Overall mortality was 7.9%, and the mortality in patients with and without gene mutations was 17.4% and 5.5%, respectively. Most of the normal host patients responded well to oral antifungal agents, while gene-deficient patients usually required lifelong treatment to stabilise their infection status. Our review indicated the importance of preventive treatment of superficial tinea in patients with immunosuppression and gene deficiencies to avoid the development of invasive dermatophytosis.
Topics: Antifungal Agents; Dermatomycoses; Humans; Invasive Fungal Infections; Organ Transplantation; Risk Factors; Skin
PubMed: 33217082
DOI: 10.1111/myc.13212 -
Journal of the European Academy of... Jan 2019Favre-Racouchot disease (FRD) is a relatively common dermatosis induced by chronic sun exposure. FRD is clinically and histologically characterized by the presence of...
Favre-Racouchot disease (FRD) is a relatively common dermatosis induced by chronic sun exposure. FRD is clinically and histologically characterized by the presence of both comedones and cysts in the context of an elastotic degeneration of the dermis. Those lesions are mainly located in the face, especially in the malar and periorbital areas. Smoking and radiotherapy seem to play a role in the pathogenesis together with UV exposure. The disease affects predominantly the aged population and seems to be a problem of mainly aesthetic concern. No official guidelines are available for the treatment of FRD; most common therapeutic strategies are represented by topical retinoids and laser treatments. The goal of our review was to identify the principal clinical and epidemiological characteristics of FRD and to analyse all the therapeutic strategies available. We also focused our attention on the follow-up of this particular dermatosis. Our aim was therefore to suggest alternative possible strategies for both the treatment and the follow-up of these patients. Our data support the efficacy of carbon dioxide laser and topical retinoids in the setting of FRD, but we also suggest considering alternative treatments, such as plasma exeresis. We also recommend planning both a short-term and a long-term follow-up visit, as the majority of relapses is observed after 10-12 months.
Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Cysts; Facial Dermatoses; Humans; Lasers, Gas; Retinoids
PubMed: 30022555
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15184 -
International Journal of Oral and... Mar 2018The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of alveolar bone reconstruction for alveolar cleft patients performed with the traditional iliac graft or... (Review)
Review
The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of alveolar bone reconstruction for alveolar cleft patients performed with the traditional iliac graft or alternative/supplementary bone grafting materials. Electronic databases, relevant journals, and reference lists of the included studies were searched to the end of June 2016. A best-evidence synthesis was performed to draw conclusions. A total of 38 studies were included, which provided 25 pieces of evidence: seven of moderate evidence and 18 of insufficient evidence. The seven pieces of moderate evidence indicated that (1) bone morphogenetic protein 2 bound to absorbable collagen sponge shares similar cleft repair efficacy to the iliac graft; (2) covering the iliac graft with an acellular dermis matrix membrane may increase bone retention for unilateral cleft patients; (3) mixing iliac graft with platelet-rich plasma may increase bone retention for skeletally mature patients, but (4) does not achieve the same result for younger patients; and compared with the iliac graft, (5) the mandible graft is more effective, whereas (6) the cranium graft and (7) rib graft are less effective for alveolar cleft reconstruction. The efficacy of the remaining grafting materials was supported by insufficient evidence. More well-designed controlled studies are needed to ascertain the long-term clinical results of alveolar cleft reconstruction.
Topics: Absorbable Implants; Acellular Dermis; Alveolar Process; Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2; Bone Transplantation; Cleft Palate; Collagen; Humans; Ilium; Mandible; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Ribs; Skull
PubMed: 28863859
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.08.003 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Aug 2011Diabetic foot ulceration is full-thickness penetration of the dermis of the foot in a person with diabetes. Severity is classified using the Wagner system, which grades... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Diabetic foot ulceration is full-thickness penetration of the dermis of the foot in a person with diabetes. Severity is classified using the Wagner system, which grades it from 1 to 5. The annual incidence of ulcers among people with diabetes is 2.5% to 10.7% in resource-rich countries, and the annual incidence of amputation for any reason is 0.25% to 1.8%.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of interventions to prevent foot ulcers and amputations in people with diabetes? What are the effects of treatments in people with diabetes with foot ulceration? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to September 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 50 systematic reviews and RCTs that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: debridement, human cultured dermis, human skin equivalent, patient education, pressure off-loading with felted foam or pressure-relief half-shoe, pressure off-loading with total-contact or non-removable casts, screening and referral to foot-care clinics, systemic hyperbaric oxygen for non-infected ulcers, systemic hyperbaric oxygen in infected ulcers, therapeutic footwear, topical growth factors, and wound dressings.
Topics: Amputation, Surgical; Debridement; Diabetic Foot; Foot; Foot Ulcer; Humans; Pressure Ulcer
PubMed: 21871137
DOI: No ID Found