-
The American Journal of Emergency... Aug 2016This meta-analysis of trials was conducted to evaluate the impact of desmopressin on renal colic pain relief in comparison to more typically used medications (opioids... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
This meta-analysis of trials was conducted to evaluate the impact of desmopressin on renal colic pain relief in comparison to more typically used medications (opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]).
METHODS
PubMed, EMbase, Scopus, CINHAL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for clinical trials. Pain reduction and need for rescue treatment were the outcomes of interest.
RESULTS
Ten studies met our inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Pooling of data showed that, on a scale of 1-10, pain reduction after 30 minutes was significantly higher in NSAID in comparison to desmopressin (3.39 with a 95% confidence interval [CI] of 4.62-2.16; P<.01), but this reduction was not significantly different between NSAID and desmopressin-NSAID combination (-0.28 with 95% CI of -0.62 to 0.05; P=.01). Summary of relative risk (RR) for the need for rescue treatment in desmopressin in comparison to NSAID was 0.31 with a 95% CI of 0.13-0.74 and a significant RR (P<.04), but no difference was shown in desmopressin-NSAID combination in comparison to NSAID (0.70 with a 95% CI of 0.49-1.00; P<.19). On this outcome, desmopressin in comparison to opioid showed insignificant RR (1.82 with a 95% CI of 0.36-4.34; P=.72), but this need in desmopressin in comparison to desmopressin-opioid combination was 0.75 with a 95% CI of 0.56-0.99 and a significant RR (P=.042).
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the results of this systematic review suggest that, according to the present low-quality studies, desmopressin can be used as an adjuvant therapy in renal colic management in combination with opioids.
Topics: Antidiuretic Agents; Deamino Arginine Vasopressin; Humans; Pain Management; Renal Colic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27289437
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.05.020 -
The Journal of Urology Sep 2014We systematically reviewed desmopressin as treatment for nocturia in generally healthy adults with a focus on benefits and harms. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
We systematically reviewed desmopressin as treatment for nocturia in generally healthy adults with a focus on benefits and harms.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
After a literature search we identified 10 articles (2,191 patients) that met our inclusion criteria of parallel group design, randomized, controlled trials with information on at least 1 benefit or harm of desmopressin in patients with nocturia. We evaluated the quality of included trials based on The Cochrane Collaboration criteria, assessed heterogeneity using the I(2) statistic and performed random effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Studies were generally of high quality, although 4 used an active run-in period to titrate the dose and exclude patients with adverse effects or who were nonresponders. Thus, they were at high risk for bias. Desmopressin doses of at least 25 mcg or greater decreased nocturnal voids and increased time to first void. A dose of 100 mcg provided just more than an hour of additional sleep before the first void compared with placebo as well as 0.72 fewer voids per night. Higher doses provided no significant increase in benefit. Hyponatremia (RR 5.1) and headache (RR 4.3) were the most common adverse effects. Serious adverse effects were rare.
CONCLUSIONS
Desmopressin appears to offer a modest benefit for treating nocturia in generally healthy adults with adequate safety. The initial dose should be between 50 and 100 mcg. Higher doses should only be used with caution and a lower initial dose of 25 to 50 mcg is appropriate in elderly patients. All patients should be monitored for hyponatremia. The drug should be used with caution in patients with chronic lung disease due to the rare occurrence of respiratory failure. Additional well designed, adequately powered studies 1 or more years in duration are needed.
Topics: Adult; Antidiuretic Agents; Deamino Arginine Vasopressin; Humans; Nocturia; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24704009
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.095 -
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology... Apr 2023Diagnostic accuracy of testing currently used for the differential diagnosis of Cushing disease (CD) vs ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion (EAS) is difficult... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
CONTEXT
Diagnostic accuracy of testing currently used for the differential diagnosis of Cushing disease (CD) vs ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone secretion (EAS) is difficult to interpret.
OBJECTIVE
The present study aimed to identify and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) test, the desmopressin test, and the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test (HDDST) when used to establish a CD or EAS diagnosis.
METHODS
This study is a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. MEDLINE, OVID, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles published between 1990 and 2021. Articles included described at least 1 test(s) (CRH, desmopressin, or HDDST) and the diagnostic reference standard(s) (histopathology, petrosal sinus sampling, surgical remission, imaging, and long-term follow-up) used to establish a CD or EAS diagnosis.
RESULTS
Sixty-two studies were included: 43 reported the use of the HDDST; 32, the CRH test; and the 21, the desmopressin test. The CRH test was found to have the highest sensitivity in detecting CD (ACTH 86.9%, 95% CI 82.1-90.6, cortisol 86.2%, 95% CI 78.3-91.5) and the highest specificity in detecting EAS (ACTH 93.9%, 95% CI 87-98.3, cortisol 89.4%, 95% CI 82.8-93.7). This resulted in a high diagnostic odds ratio (58, 95% CI 43.25-77.47), large area under the curve, and a receiver operating characteristic of 0.934. The diagnostic accuracy of the HDDST and desmopressin test was lower than that of the CRH test.
CONCLUSION
The meta-analysis indicates that a patient with a positive ACTH response after a CRH test is highly likely to have CD. Further studies analyzing role of dynamic testing in addition to imaging are needed.
Topics: Humans; Cushing Syndrome; Deamino Arginine Vasopressin; Hydrocortisone; Diagnosis, Differential; ACTH Syndrome, Ectopic; Pituitary ACTH Hypersecretion; Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone
PubMed: 36453141
DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgac686 -
Cureus May 2023The literature on pharmacologic treatments for postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is inconsistent and unstandardized. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate... (Review)
Review
The literature on pharmacologic treatments for postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is inconsistent and unstandardized. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate choices in pharmacologic treatment options for POTS and the challenges encountered in the studies. We searched numerous databases like PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for literature published before April 8, 2023. The search was done to retrieve potential peer-reviewed articles that explored drug therapy in POTS. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were used to conduct the systematic review. Of the 421 potential articles assessed, 17 met the inclusion criteria. Results demonstrated that pharmacologic treatment options for POTS were effective in reducing symptoms of POTS, but most of the studies were underpowered. Several were terminated due to various reasons. Midodrine ivabradine, bisoprolol, fludrocortisone, droxidopa, desmopressin, propranolol, modafinil, methylphenidate, and melatonin have been studied with positive impact but sample sizes that were low in the range of 10-50 subjects. Therefore, we concluded the treatment options effectively improve symptoms of POTS and increase orthostatic tolerance, but more evidence is needed as most studies had a low sample size and thus are underpowered.
PubMed: 37313107
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38887 -
International Urology and Nephrology Apr 2012The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of desmopressin for the treatment of nocturia. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of desmopressin for the treatment of nocturia.
METHODS
Databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI web of knowledge, the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register of Controlled Trials and Chinese Biological Medical Database were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that referred to the efficacy and safety of desmopressin for the treatment of nocturia. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted.
RESULTS
Five studies involving 619 participants were included for the meta-analysis, and 8 RCTs of cross-over design were also identified for the systematic review. The analysis revealed that desmopressin might significantly decrease the frequency of nocturnal voids, nocturnal urine volume and nocturnal diuresis, potentially resulting in an extended duration of the first sleep period and improved sleep quality. The adverse effects of desmopressin were similar to those observed in the placebo group.
CONCLUSIONS
Administered desmopressin was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for nocturia.
Topics: Antidiuretic Agents; Deamino Arginine Vasopressin; Humans; Nocturia; Treatment Outcome; Urination
PubMed: 21898039
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-011-0054-3 -
Frontiers in Pediatrics 2023The desmopressin combined with anticholinergic agents for the treatment of nocturnal enuresis (NE) remains controversial. This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The desmopressin combined with anticholinergic agents for the treatment of nocturnal enuresis (NE) remains controversial. This meta-analysis assesses the efficacy and safety of desmopressin compared with desmopressin plus anticholinergic agents for the treatment of NE.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register databases for RCTs published for the treatment of NE. Systematic review was carried out using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. This meta-analysis used RevMan v.5.1.0 to analyze data.
RESULTS
Eight studies involving 600 patients (293 in the combination group and 307 in the desmopressin group) contained meaningful data. The results were as follows: after one month of treatment, compared with the desmopressin monotherapy group, the combination group was significantly better in treating NE in FR (full responders, = 0.003), FR + PR (partial responders) ( < 0.0001), and the mean number of wet nights ( = 0.004); also, the combination group had a better effect in FR ( < 0.00001), FR + PR ( = 0.02) and the mean number of wet nights ( = 0.04) after 3 months' treatment. For side effects, combination therapy does not cause more adverse events in treating NE ( = 0.42).
CONCLUSIONS
This study elucidates that desmopressin combined with the anticholinergic agent was demonstrated to be more effective in treating NE than desmopressin monotherapy, and the anticholinergic agent does not increase the risk of adverse events (AEs).
PubMed: 37928358
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1242777 -
Perioperative Medicine (London, England) Jan 2024We systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the effects of peri-procedural desmopressin in patients without known inherited bleeding disorders undergoing... (Review)
Review
We systematically reviewed the literature to investigate the effects of peri-procedural desmopressin in patients without known inherited bleeding disorders undergoing surgery or other invasive procedures. We included 63 randomized trials (4163 participants) published up to February 1, 2023. Seven trials were published after a 2017 Cochrane systematic review on this topic. There were 38 trials in cardiac surgery, 22 in noncardiac surgery, and 3 in non-surgical procedures. Meta-analyses demonstrated that desmopressin likely does not reduce the risk of receiving a red blood cell transfusion (25 trials, risk ratio [RR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86 to 1.05) and may not reduce the risk of reoperation due to bleeding (22 trials, RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.19) when compared to placebo or usual care. However, we demonstrated significant reductions in number of units of red blood cells transfused (25 trials, mean difference -0.55 units, 95% CI - 0.94 to - 0.15), total volume of blood loss (33 trials, standardized mean difference - 0.40 standard deviations; 95% CI - 0.56 to - 0.23), and the risk of bleeding events (2 trials, RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.84). The certainty of evidence of these findings was generally low. Desmopressin increased the risk of clinically significant hypotension that required intervention (19 trials, RR 2.15, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.41). Limited evidence suggests that tranexamic acid is more effective than desmopressin in reducing transfusion risk (3 trials, RR 2.38 favoring tranexamic acid, 95% CI 1.06 to 5.39) and total volume of blood loss (3 trials, mean difference 391.7 mL favoring tranexamic acid, 95% CI - 93.3 to 876.7 mL). No trials directly informed the safety and hemostatic efficacy of desmopressin in advanced kidney disease. In conclusion, desmopressin likely reduces periprocedural blood loss and the number of units of blood transfused in small trials with methodologic limitations. However, the risk of hypotension needs to be mitigated. Large trials should evaluate desmopressin alongside tranexamic acid and enroll patients with advanced kidney disease.
PubMed: 38263259
DOI: 10.1186/s13741-023-00358-4 -
Journal of Endocrinological... Oct 2023The clinical and hormonal overlap between neoplastic (CS) and non-neoplastic (NNH/pCS) hypercortisolism is a challenge. Various dynamic tests have been proposed to allow... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
The clinical and hormonal overlap between neoplastic (CS) and non-neoplastic (NNH/pCS) hypercortisolism is a challenge. Various dynamic tests have been proposed to allow an early discrimination between these conditions, but to date there is no agreement on which of them should be used.
AIM
To provide an overview of the available tests and to obtain a quantitative synthesis of their diagnostic performance in discriminating NNH/pCS from CS.
METHODS
The included articles, published between 1990 and 2022, applied one or more second line tests to differentiate NNH/pCS from CS patients. For the NNH/pCS group, we admitted the inclusion of patients presenting clinical features and/or biochemical findings suggestive of hypercortisolism despite apparent lack of a pCS-related condition.
RESULTS
The electronic search identified 339 articles. After references analysis and study selection, we identified 9 studies on combined dexamethasone-corticotropin releasing hormone (Dex-CRH) test, 4 on Desmopressin test and 3 on CRH test; no study on Dex-Desmopressin met the inclusion criteria. Dex-CRH test provided the highest sensitivity (97%, 95 CI% [88%; 99%]). CRH tests showed excellent specificity (99%, 95% CI [0%; 100%]), with low sensitivity. Although metaregression analysis based on diagnostic odds ratio failed to provide a gold standard, CRH test (64.77, 95% CI [0.15; 27,174.73]) seemed to lack in performance compared to the others (Dex-CRH 138.83, 95% CI [49.38; 390.32] and Desmopressin 110.44, 95% CI [32.13; 379.63]).
DISCUSSION
Both Dex-CRH and Desmopressin tests can be valid tools in helping discrimination between NNH/pCS and CS. Further studies are needed on this topic, possibly focusing on mild Cushing's Disease and well-characterized NNH/pCS patients.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022359774 , identifier CRD42022359774.
Topics: Humans; Diagnosis, Differential; Cushing Syndrome; Deamino Arginine Vasopressin; Hospitalization; Odds Ratio
PubMed: 37079177
DOI: 10.1007/s40618-023-02099-z -
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms May 2022Desmopressin acetate was recommended for nocturia in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients recently, but its effect and safety is still controversial. We aimed to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Desmopressin acetate was recommended for nocturia in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients recently, but its effect and safety is still controversial. We aimed to establish a systematic review and meta-analysis to confirm its effect on symptom relief and adverse effects.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science and Science Direct databases from January 2000 to October 2021 for controlled trials of BPH patients comparing oral desmopressin with control groups. The mean difference (MD) and odds ratio (OR) were meta-analyzed.
RESULTS
Four articles with 500 patients were included. Significantly greater benefit was detected for the desmopressin group in the improvement of nocturia (P = .004), international prostate symptom score - storage (IPSS-S) (P = .03), and quality of life (QoL) (P = .04) scores. Patients treated with desmopressin were at higher risk than the control group for short-term adverse events (P < .001), including nausea (4.71%, P = .04), headache (20%, P < .00001), dizziness (5.88%, P = .02) and hyponatremia (4.71%, P = .04), but the long-term incidence might decrease.
CONCLUSION
Desmopressin acetate can reduce nocturia frequency and improve the IPSS-S and QoL score in BPH patients. Some adverse reactions of desmopressin, such as hyponatremia, headache, dizziness and nausea, may be mild and short-term. No significant difference of desmopressin was found in improving the overall IPSS score and maximum urine flow.
Topics: Deamino Arginine Vasopressin; Dizziness; Headache; Humans; Hyponatremia; Male; Nausea; Nocturia; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35034423
DOI: 10.1111/luts.12423 -
Asian Journal of Urology Jan 2022To evaluate the efficacy and safety of desmopressin on frequency and urgency in female patients with overactive bladder (OAB) and nocturia. (Review)
Review
Efficacy and safety of desmopressin on frequency and urgency in female patients with overactive bladder and nocturia, current clinical features and outcomes: A systematic review.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of desmopressin on frequency and urgency in female patients with overactive bladder (OAB) and nocturia.
METHODS
A selective database search was conducted to validate the effectiveness of desmopressin in patients with OAB and nocturia. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were utilised. The meta-analysis included 378 women (five studies) with OAB. The clinical outcomes and adverse events were analysed.
RESULTS
The treatment strategy of all the studies included can be divided into three categories: (1) The effect of desmopressin compared with baseline, (2) desmopressin compared with placebo, and (3) desmopressin and anticholinergic combination versus desmopressin monotherapy. There was a significant (50%) reduction in nocturia and urgency episodes after using desmopressin alone. Combined desmopressin and anticholinergic led to a decrease in the frequency of nocturia voids when only using anticholinergic (65% 33.2%). The time increased in the middle to the first nightly voids in the combination arm (65.11 min; =0.045). The mean incidence (standard deviation) of leak-free episodes was higher under desmopressin than under placebo in the first 4 h (62% [35%] 48% [40%]) and in the first 8 h (55% [37%] 40% [41%]). The safety profile was comparable between treatments.
CONCLUSION
Available data indicate that desmopressin is efficacious in significantly reducing nighttime urine production, episodes of nocturia, and urgency episodes. The affectivity of the combination therapy was very high with least side effects for the treatment of OAB/nocturnal polyuria.
PubMed: 35198394
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.05.005