-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Sep 2022This review is the third update of a previously published Cochrane Review. The original review, looking at all possible cardioprotective agents, was split and this part... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This review is the third update of a previously published Cochrane Review. The original review, looking at all possible cardioprotective agents, was split and this part now focuses on dexrazoxane only. Anthracyclines are effective chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of numerous malignancies. Unfortunately, their use is limited by a dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. In an effort to prevent or reduce this cardiotoxicity, different cardioprotective agents have been studied, including dexrazoxane.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy of dexrazoxane to prevent or reduce cardiotoxicity and determine possible effects of dexrazoxane on antitumour efficacy, quality of life and toxicities other than cardiac damage in adults and children with cancer receiving anthracyclines when compared to placebo or no additional treatment.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Embase to May 2021. We also handsearched reference lists, the proceedings of relevant conferences and ongoing trials registers.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which dexrazoxane was compared to no additional therapy or placebo in adults and children with cancer receiving anthracyclines.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently performed study selection, data extraction, risk of bias and GRADE assessment of included studies. We analysed results in adults and children separately. We performed analyses according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
MAIN RESULTS
For this update, we identified 548 unique records. We included three additional RCTs: two paediatric and one adult. Therefore, we included a total of 13 eligible RCTs (five paediatric and eight adult). The studies enrolled 1252 children with leukaemia, lymphoma or a solid tumour and 1269 participants, who were mostly diagnosed with breast cancer. In adults, moderate-quality evidence showed that there was less clinical heart failure with the use of dexrazoxane (risk ratio (RR) 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11 to 0.43; 7 studies, 1221 adults). In children, we identified no difference in clinical heart failure risk between treatment groups (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01 to 4.19; 3 studies, 885 children; low-quality evidence). In three paediatric studies assessing cardiomyopathy/heart failure as the primary cause of death, none of the children had this outcome (1008 children, low-quality evidence). In the adult studies, different definitions for subclinical myocardial dysfunction and clinical heart failure combined were used, but pooled analyses were possible: there was a benefit in favour of the use of dexrazoxane (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.56; 3 studies, 417 adults and RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.66; 2 studies, 534 adults, respectively, moderate-quality evidence). In the paediatric studies, definitions of subclinical myocardial dysfunction and clinical heart failure combined were incomparable, making pooling impossible. One paediatric study showed a benefit in favour of dexrazoxane (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.85; 33 children; low-quality evidence), whereas another study showed no difference between treatment groups (Fischer exact P = 0.12; 537 children; very low-quality evidence). Overall survival (OS) was reported in adults and overall mortality in children. The meta-analyses of both outcomes showed no difference between treatment groups (hazard ratio (HR) 1.04, 95% 0.88 to 1.23; 4 studies; moderate-quality evidence; and HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.42; 3 studies, 1008 children; low-quality evidence, respectively). Progression-free survival (PFS) was only reported in adults. We subdivided PFS into three analyses based on the comparability of definitions, and identified a longer PFS in favour of dexrazoxane in one study (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.90; 164 adults; low-quality evidence). There was no difference between treatment groups in the other two analyses (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.40; 1 study; low-quality evidence; and HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.43; 2 studies; moderate-quality evidence, respectively). In adults, there was no difference in tumour response rate between treatment groups (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.04; 6 studies, 956 adults; moderate-quality evidence). We subdivided tumour response rate in children into two analyses based on the comparability of definitions, and identified no difference between treatment groups (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.07; 1 study, 206 children; very low-quality evidence; and RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.01; 1 study, 200 children; low-quality evidence, respectively). The occurrence of secondary malignant neoplasms (SMN) was only assessed in children. The available and worst-case analyses were identical and showed a difference in favour of the control group (RR 3.08, 95% CI 1.13 to 8.38; 3 studies, 1015 children; low-quality evidence). In the best-case analysis, the direction of effect was the same, but there was no difference between treatment groups (RR 2.51, 95% CI 0.96 to 6.53; 4 studies, 1220 children; low-quality evidence). For other adverse effects, results also varied. None of the studies evaluated quality of life. If not reported, the number of participants for an analysis was unclear.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analyses showed the efficacy of dexrazoxane in preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults treated with anthracyclines. In children, there was a difference between treatment groups for one cardiac outcome (i.e. for one of the definitions used for clinical heart failure and subclinical myocardial dysfunction combined) in favour of dexrazoxane. In adults, no evidence of a negative effect on tumour response rate, OS and PFS was identified; and in children, no evidence of a negative effect on tumour response rate and overall mortality was identified. The results for adverse effects varied. In children, dexrazoxane may be associated with a higher risk of SMN; in adults this was not addressed. In adults, the quality of the evidence ranged between moderate and low; in children, it ranged between low and very low. Before definitive conclusions on the use of dexrazoxane can be made, especially in children, more high-quality research is needed. We conclude that if the risk of cardiac damage is expected to be high, it might be justified to use dexrazoxane in children and adults with cancer who are treated with anthracyclines. However, clinicians and patients should weigh the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane against the possible risk of adverse effects, including SMN, for each individual. For children, the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group has developed a clinical practice guideline.
Topics: Adult; Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiotoxicity; Child; Dexrazoxane; Heart Failure; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Polyketides; Systematic Reviews as Topic
PubMed: 36162822
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014638.pub2 -
Journal of the National Cancer Institute Apr 2016Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that dexrazoxane reduces anthracycline cardiotoxicity in adults, but use in children has been hindered by... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that dexrazoxane reduces anthracycline cardiotoxicity in adults, but use in children has been hindered by lack of direct evidence of cardioprotection and concerns regarding second malignant neoplasms (SMNs). This study aimed to systematically review the evidence regarding dexrazoxane in children.
METHODS
We searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and abstracts for RCTs and nonrandomized studies (NRSs) that compared dexrazoxane to no cardioprotection among children. We combined findings using random-effects models. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS
Eleven eligible publications reported results from five RCTs (1254 patients), and 15 publications reported results from 12 NRSs (3385 patients). Dexrazoxane did not impact clinical cardiotoxicity in RCTs because of a low cardiotoxic event rate (three events among all patients) but was associated with a reduction in subclinical cardiotoxicity. Among NRSs, dexrazoxane was associated with a reduction in clinical cardiotoxicity (relative risk (RR) = 0.29, P = .001) and clinical+subclinical cardiotoxicity (RR = 0.43, P < .001). Among RCTs, 17 of 635 (2.7%) patients treated with dexrazoxane developed an SMN compared with seven of 619 (1.1%) who did not receive dexrazoxane (RR = 2.37, P = .06). Two RCTs that used concurrent etoposide reported an increased risk of acute myeloid leukemia, while one that used cranial radiation reported an increased risk of brain tumors. Event-free survival did not differ (P = .91).
CONCLUSION
Dexrazoxane is associated with a statistically significant risk reduction for most cardiotoxic outcomes. Dexrazoxane is associated with a statistically borderline increase in SMNs, possibly because of an interaction with concurrent cancer therapies. The decision to use dexrazoxane in children should balance the risks of cardiotoxicity and SMNs specific to each treatment protocol.
Topics: Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Bias; Cardiotonic Agents; Child; Dexrazoxane; Disease-Free Survival; Evidence-Based Medicine; Heart; Heart Diseases; Humans; Incidence; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Neoplasms, Second Primary; Risk; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26598513
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv357 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2011Anthracyclines are among the most effective chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of numerous malignancies. Unfortunately, their use is limited by a dose-dependent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Anthracyclines are among the most effective chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of numerous malignancies. Unfortunately, their use is limited by a dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. In an effort to prevent this cardiotoxicity, different cardioprotective agents have been studied.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy of different cardioprotective agents in preventing heart damage in cancer patients treated with anthracyclines.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 10), MEDLINE (1966 to November 2010) and EMBASE (1980 to November 2010) databases. In addition, we handsearched reference lists, conference proceedings of the International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meetings (1998 to 2010) and ongoing trials registers.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which any cardioprotective agent was compared to no additional therapy or placebo in cancer patients (children and adults) receiving anthracyclines.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently performed the study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction including adverse effects.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified RCTs for the eight cardioprotective agents N-acetylcysteine, phenethylamines, coenzyme Q10, a combination of vitamins E and C and N-acetylcysteine, L-carnitine, carvedilol, amifostine and dexrazoxane (mostly for adults with advanced breast cancer). All studies had methodological limitations and for the first seven agents there were too few studies to allow pooling of results. None of the individual studies showed a cardioprotective effect. The 10 included studies on dexrazoxane enrolled 1619 patients. The meta-analysis for dexrazoxane showed a statistically significant benefit in favour of dexrazoxane for the occurrence of heart failure (risk ratio (RR) 0.29, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.41). No evidence was found for a difference in response rate or survival between the dexrazoxane and control groups. The results for adverse effects were ambiguous. No significant difference in the occurrence of secondary malignancies was identified.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
No definitive conclusions can be made about the efficacy of cardioprotective agents for which pooling of results was impossible. Dexrazoxane prevents heart damage and no evidence for a difference in response rate or survival between the dexrazoxane and control groups was identified. The evidence available did not allow us to reach any definite conclusions about adverse effects. We conclude that if the risk of cardiac damage is expected to be high, it might be justified to use dexrazoxane in patients with cancer treated with anthracyclines. However, clinicians should weigh the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane against the possible risk of adverse effects for each individual patient.
Topics: Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Cardiotonic Agents; Cytoprotection; Heart Diseases; Humans; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Razoxane
PubMed: 21678342
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003917.pub4 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Apr 2008Anthracyclines are among the most effective chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of numerous malignancies. Unfortunately, their use is limited by a dose-dependent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Anthracyclines are among the most effective chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of numerous malignancies. Unfortunately, their use is limited by a dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. In an effort to prevent this cardiotoxicity, different cardioprotective agents have been studied.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy of different cardioprotective agents in preventing heart damage in cancer patients treated with anthracyclines.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the databases of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, Issue 2, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2007) and EMBASE (1980 to April 2007). In addition, we handsearched reference lists and conference proceedings of the SIOP and ASCO meetings (1998 to 2006).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which any cardioprotective agent was compared to no additional or placebo therapy in cancer patients (children and adults) receiving anthracyclines.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently performed the study selection, quality assessment and data-extraction including adverse effects.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified RCTs for seven cardioprotective agents: N-acetylcysteine, phenetylamines, coenzyme Q10, combination of vitamins E and C and N-acetylcysteine, L-carnitine, carvedilol and dexrazoxane (mostly adults with advanced breast cancer). All studies had methodological limitations. For the first six agents, there were too few studies to allow pooling of results. None of the individual studies showed a cardioprotective effect. The nine included studies of dexrazoxane enrolled 1403 patients. The meta-analysis of dexrazoxane showed a statistically significant benefit in favour of dexrazoxane for the occurrence of heart failure (Relative Risk (RR) 0.29, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.41). No evidence was found for a difference in response rate or survival between the dexrazoxane and control group. Only for one adverse effect (abnormal white blood cell count at nadir) a difference in favour of the control group was identified.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
For cardioprotective agents for which pooling was impossible, no definitive conclusions can be made about their efficacy. Dexrazoxane prevents heart damage and no evidence for a difference in response rate or survival between the dexrazoxane and control group was identified. Only for an abnormal white blood cell count at nadir a clearly significant difference in favour of the control group was identified. We conclude that if the risk of cardiac damage is expected to be high, it might be justified to use dexrazoxane in patients with cancer treated with anthracyclines. However, for each individual patient clinicians should weigh the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane against the possible risk of adverse effects.
Topics: Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Cardiotonic Agents; Cytoprotection; Heart Diseases; Humans; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 18425895
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003917.pub3 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2005Anthracyclines are among the most effective chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of numerous malignancies. Unfortunately, their use is limited by a dose-dependent... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Anthracyclines are among the most effective chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of numerous malignancies. Unfortunately, their use is limited by a dose-dependent cardiotoxicity. In an effort to prevent this cardiotoxicity, different cardioprotective agents have been studied.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to assess the efficacy of different cardioprotective agents in preventing heart damage in cancer patients treated with anthracyclines.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the databases of CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (1966 to August 2002) and EMBASE (1980 to August 2002). In addition, we handsearched reference lists and conference proceedings of the International Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (1998 to 2002).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which any cardioprotective agent was compared to no additional or placebo therapy in cancer patients (children and adults) receiving anthracyclines.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers independently performed the study selection, quality assessment and data-extraction including adverse effects.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified RCTs for 5 cardioprotective agents: N-acetylcysteine (1 study; 54 patients), phenetylamines (2 studies; 100 patients), coenzyme Q10 (1 study; 20 patients), combination of vitamin E, vitamin C and N-acetylcysteine (1 study; 14 patients) and dexrazoxane (6 studies; 1013 patients). All studies had methodological limitations. Due to the insufficient number of studies, for the first four mentioned cardioprotective agents pooling of the results was impossible. None of the individual studies showed a cardioprotective effect. The meta-analysis of the dexrazoxane-studies showed a statistically significant benefit in favour of dexrazoxane for the occurrence of heart failure (Relative Risk (RR) = 0.28, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.18 to 0.42, P < 0.00001). No statistically significant difference in response rate between the dexrazoxane and control group was found (RR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.01, P = 0.06), but there was some suggestion that patients treated with dexrazoxane might have a lower anti-tumour response rate. Our meta-analysis of survival showed no significant difference between the dexrazoxane and control group. For adverse effects pooling was impossible. However, no important differences in the occurrence of side effects were found. The majority of the patients included in this meta-analysis were adults with advanced breast cancer.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
For cardioprotective agents for which pooling was impossible no high quality evidence was available and therefore, no definitive conclusions can be made about their efficacy. Dexrazoxane prevents heart damage, however there was some suggestion that patients treated with dexrazoxane might have a lower anti-tumour response rate. There was no significant difference in survival between the dexrazoxane and control group. We conclude that if the risk of cardiac damage is expected to be high, it might be justified to use dexrazoxane in patients with cancer treated with anthracyclines. However, for each individual patient clinicians should weigh the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane against the possible risk of a lower response rate.
Topics: Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Cardiotonic Agents; Cytoprotection; Heart Diseases; Humans; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 15674919
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003917.pub2 -
Journal of Medicine and Life Apr 2023Cancer is a major public health problem, and chemotherapy plays a significant role in the management of neoplastic diseases. However, chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity... (Review)
Review
Cancer is a major public health problem, and chemotherapy plays a significant role in the management of neoplastic diseases. However, chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity is a serious side effect secondary to cardiac damage caused by antineoplastic's direct and indirect toxicity. Currently, there are no reliable and approved methods for preventing or treating chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Understanding the mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity may be vital to improving survival. The independent risk factors for developing cardiotoxicity must be considered to prevent myocardial damage without decreasing the therapeutic efficacy of cancer treatment. This systematic review aimed to identify and analyze the evidence on chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity, associated risk factors, and methods to decrease or prevent it. We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) using the following keywords: "doxorubicin cardiotoxicity", "anthracycline cardiotoxicity", "chemotherapy", "digoxin decrease cardiotoxicity", "ATG7 activators", retrieving 59 articles fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Therapeutic schemes can be changed by choosing prolonged infusion application over boluses. In addition, some agents like Dexrazoxane can reduce chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in high-risk groups. Recent research found that Digoxin, ATG7 activators, Resveratrol, and other medical substances or herbal compounds have a comparable effect on Dexrazoxane in anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity.
Topics: Humans; Resveratrol; Cardiotoxicity; Dexrazoxane; Anthracyclines; Digoxin; Polyketides; Antineoplastic Agents
PubMed: 37305823
DOI: 10.25122/jml-2022-0322 -
Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials 2023Anthracyclines can improve survival in many types of malignancies, but dose-dependent and irreversible results following the use of anthracyclines have been associated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Anthracyclines can improve survival in many types of malignancies, but dose-dependent and irreversible results following the use of anthracyclines have been associated with cardiomyopathy. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of prophylactic agents for preventing cardiotoxicity induced following anticancer agents.
METHODS
In this meta-analysis, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed were surfed for articles published by December 30, 2020. The keywords were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), enalapril, captopril, angiotensin receptor blocker, beta blocker, metoprolol, bisoprolol, isoprolol, statin, valsartan, losartan, eplerenone, idarubicin, nebivolol, dihydromyricetin, ampelopsin, spironolactone, dexrazoxane, antioxidants, cardiotoxicity, n-acetyl-tryptamine, cancer, neoplasms, chemotherapy, anthracyclines, doxorubicin, daunorubicin, epirubicin, idarubicin, ejection fraction or a combination of them in the titles or abstracts.
RESULTS
A total of 17 articles out of 728 studies examining 2,674 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Ejection fraction (EF) values in the baseline, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up in the intervention group turned out to be 62.52 ± 2.48, 59.63 ± 4.85, and 59.42 ± 4.53, whereas in the control group appeared to be 62.81 ± 2.58, 57.69 ± 4.32, and 58.60 ± 4.58, respectively. Through comparison of the two groups, EF was found to increase in the intervention group by 0.40 after 6 months (Standardized mean difference (SMD): 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27, 0.54), thus proving higher than that of the control groups following the cardiac drugs.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis showed that prophylactic treatment with cardio-protective drugs, including dexrazoxane, beta blocker, and ACEI drugs in patients undergoing chemotherapy with anthracycline, have a protective effect on LVEF and prevent EF drop.
Topics: Humans; Cardiotoxicity; Dexrazoxane; Idarubicin; Antineoplastic Agents; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Anthracyclines; Neoplasms; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists
PubMed: 36803186
DOI: 10.2174/1574887118666230118102252 -
European Journal of Cancer (Oxford,... Sep 2013Cardiotoxicity is a well-recognised complication of chemotherapy with anthracycline and/or trastuzumab, and its prevention remains an important challenge in cancer... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Cardiotoxicity is a well-recognised complication of chemotherapy with anthracycline and/or trastuzumab, and its prevention remains an important challenge in cancer survivorship. Several successful preventative strategies have been identified in animal trials. We sought to assemble the clinical evidence that prophylactic pharmacological interventions could prevent left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and heart failure in patients undergoing chemotherapy.
METHODS
We undertook a systemic review of the evidence from randomised trials and observational studies where a prophylactic intervention was compared with a control arm in patients with a normal ejection fraction and no past history of heart failure. The primary outcome was development of heart failure (HF), a drop in ejection fraction (EF) or both. A random-effects model was used to combine relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and a meta-regression was undertaken to assess the impact of potential covariates.
FINDINGS
Data were collated from 14 published articles (n=2015 paediatric and adult patients) comprising 12 randomised controlled trials and two observational studies. The most studied chemotherapeutic agents were anthracyclines, and prophylactic agents included dexrazoxane, statins, beta-blocker and angiotensin antagonists. There were 304 cardiac events in the control arm compared to 83 in the prophylaxis arm (RR=0.31 [95% CI: 0.25-0.39], p<0.00001). Cardiac events were reduced with dexrazoxane (RR=0.35 [95% CI 0.27-0.45], p<0.00001), beta-blockade (RR=0.31 [95% CI 0.16-0.63], p=0.001), statin (RR=0.31 [95% CI 0.13-0.77], p=0.01) and angiotensin antagonists (RR=0.11 [95% CI 0.04-0.29], p<0.0001).
INTERPRETATION
Prophylactic treatment with dexrazoxane, beta-blocker, statin or angiotensin antagonists appear to have similar efficacy for reducing cardiotoxicity.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Aged; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Agents; Cardiotonic Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Risk Factors; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left
PubMed: 23706982
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.04.030 -
American Journal of Physiology. Heart... Feb 2017Cancer and cardiovascular disease are major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Older cancer patients often wrestle with underlying heart disease during cancer... (Review)
Review
Cancer and cardiovascular disease are major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Older cancer patients often wrestle with underlying heart disease during cancer therapy, whereas childhood cancer survivors are living long enough to face long-term unintended cardiac consequences of cancer therapies, including anthracyclines. Although effective and widely used, particularly in the pediatric population, anthracycline-related side effects including dose-dependent association with cardiac dysfunction limit their usage. Currently, there is only one United States Food and Drug Administration-approved drug, dexrazoxane, available for the prevention and mitigation of cardiotoxicity related to anthracycline therapy. While aerobic exercise has been shown to reduce cardiovascular complications in multiple diseases, its role as a therapeutic approach to mitigate cardiovascular consequences of cancer therapy is in its infancy. This systematic review aims to summarize how aerobic exercise can help to alleviate unintended cardiotoxic side effects and identify gaps in need of further research. While published work supports the benefits of aerobic exercise, additional clinical investigations are warranted to determine the effects of different exercise modalities, timing, and duration to identify optimal aerobic training regimens for reducing cardiovascular complications, particularly late cardiac effects, in cancer survivors exposed to anthracyclines.
Topics: Anthracyclines; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiotoxicity; Dexrazoxane; Exercise; Exercise Therapy; Heart Diseases; Humans; Neoplasms; Survivors
PubMed: 27923793
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00646.2016 -
BMC Cancer May 2015The benefits associated with some cancer treatments do not come without risk. A serious side effect of some common cancer treatments is cardiotoxicity. Increased... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The benefits associated with some cancer treatments do not come without risk. A serious side effect of some common cancer treatments is cardiotoxicity. Increased recognition of the public health implications of cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicity has resulted in a proliferation of systematic reviews in this field to guide practice. Quality appraisal of these reviews is likely to limit the influence of biased conclusions from systematic reviews that have used poor methodology related to clinical decision-making. The aim of this meta-review is to appraise and synthesise evidence from only high quality systematic reviews focused on the prevention, detection or management of cancer treatment-induced cardiotoxicity.
METHODS
Using Cochrane methodology, we searched databases, citations and hand-searched bibliographies. Two reviewers independently appraised reviews and extracted findings. A total of 18 high quality systematic reviews were subsequently analysed, 67 % (n = 12) of these comprised meta-analyses.
RESULTS
One systematic review concluded that there is insufficient evidence regarding the utility of cardiac biomarkers for the detection of cardiotoxicity. The following strategies might reduce the risk of cardiotoxicity: 1) The concomitant administration of dexrazoxane with anthracylines; 2) The avoidance of anthracyclines where possible; 3) The continuous administration of anthracyclines (>6 h) rather than bolus dosing; and 4) The administration of anthracycline derivatives such as epirubicin or liposomal-encapsulated doxorubicin instead of doxorubicin. In terms of management, one review focused on medical interventions for treating anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity during or after treatment of childhood cancer. Neither intervention (enalapril and phosphocreatine) was associated with statistically significant improvement in ejection fraction or mortality.
CONCLUSION
This review highlights the lack of high level evidence to guide clinical decision-making with respect to the detection and management of cancer treatment-associated cardiotoxicity. There is more evidence with respect to the prevention of this adverse effect of cancer treatment. This evidence, however, only applies to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in a predominantly adult population. There is no high-level evidence to guide clinical decision-making regarding the prevention, detection or management of radiation-induced cardiotoxicity.
Topics: Animals; Anthracyclines; Antibiotics, Antineoplastic; Cardiotoxicity; Databases, Bibliographic; Disease Management; Humans; Neoplasms
PubMed: 25948399
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-015-1407-6