-
Chest Dec 2013Understanding the comparative effectiveness of treatments for patients with unexplained or refractory cough is important to increase awareness of proven therapies and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Understanding the comparative effectiveness of treatments for patients with unexplained or refractory cough is important to increase awareness of proven therapies and their potential adverse effects in this unique population.
METHODS
We performed a literature search for English-language studies published up to June 2012 that compared symptomatic therapies for chronic cough. Two investigators screened each abstract and full-text article for inclusion, abstracted data, and rated quality. Meta-analysis with random-effects models was used to summarize effects of treatments.
RESULTS
We identified 49 studies (3,067 patients) comprising 68 therapeutic comparisons. Of the studied agents, opioid and certain nonopioid and nonanesthetic antitussives had demonstrated efficacy for chronic cough in adults. Compared with placebo, effect sizes (standardized mean differences for cough severity and rate ratios for cough frequency) for opioids were 0.55 (95% CI, 0.38-0.72; P < .0001) and 0.57 (95% CI, 0.36-0.91; P = .0260), respectively. For dextromethorphan, effect sizes were 0.37 (95% CI, 0.19-0.56; P = .0008) and 0.40 (95% CI, 0.18-0.85; P = .0248), respectively. The overall strength of evidence was limited by inconsistency and imprecision of results and by small numbers of direct comparisons. Nonpharmacologic therapies and the management of cough in children were infrequently studied.
CONCLUSIONS
Although evidence is limited, opioid and certain nonopioid and nonanesthetic antitussives demonstrated efficacy for treating chronic cough in adults. There is a need for further studies in patients with unexplained or refractory cough as well as for more systematic study designs, assessment of patient-centered outcomes, and reporting.
Topics: Antitussive Agents; Chronic Disease; Cough; Humans; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 23928798
DOI: 10.1378/chest.13-0490 -
World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology -... Jun 2022Management of postoperative pain after head and neck cancer surgery is a complex issue, requiring a careful balance of analgesic properties and side effects. The... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Management of postoperative pain after head and neck cancer surgery is a complex issue, requiring a careful balance of analgesic properties and side effects. The objective of this review is to discuss the efficacy and safety of multimodal analgesia (MMA) for these patients.
METHODS
Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched for all comparative studies of patients receiving MMA (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, anticonvulsants, local anesthetics, and corticosteroids) for head and neck cancer surgeries. The primary outcome was additional postoperative opioid usage, and secondary outcomes included subjective pain scores, complications, adverse effects, and 30-day outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of five studies representing 592 patients (MMA, = 275; non-MMA, = 317) met inclusion criteria. The most commonly used agents were gabapentin, NSAIDs, and acetaminophen ( = 221), NSAIDs ( = 221), followed by corticosteroids ( = 35), dextromethorphan ( = 40), and local nerve block ( = 19). Four studies described a significant decrease in overall postoperative narcotic usage with two studies reporting a significant decrease in hospital time. Subjective pain scores widely varied with two studies reporting reduced pain at postoperative day 3. There were no differences in surgical outcomes, medical complications, adverse effects, or 30-day mortality and readmission rates.
CONCLUSION
MMA is an increasingly popular strategy that may reduce dependence on opioids for the treatment of postoperative pain. A variety of regimens and protocols are available for providers to utilize in the appropriate head and neck cancer patient.
PubMed: 35782401
DOI: 10.1002/wjo2.62 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Aug 2007The main risk factor for postherpetic neuralgia is increasing age; it is uncommon in people under 50 years, but develops in 20% of people aged 60-65 years who have had... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The main risk factor for postherpetic neuralgia is increasing age; it is uncommon in people under 50 years, but develops in 20% of people aged 60-65 years who have had acute herpes zoster, and in more than 30% of those people aged over 80 years. Up to 2% of people with acute herpes zoster may continue to have postherpetic pain for 5 years or more.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of interventions, during an acute attack of herpes zoster, aimed at preventing postherpetic neuralgia? What are the effects of interventions to relieve established postherpetic neuralgia after the rash has healed? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and other important databases up to December 2006 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 28 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: corticosteroids, dextromethorphan, dressings, gabapentin, oral antiviral agents, oral opioid analgesics, topical anaesthesia (lidocaine), topical antiviral agents (idoxuridine), topical counterirritants (capsaicin), tricyclic antidepressants.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Neuralgia; Neuralgia, Postherpetic; Pain Measurement
PubMed: 19454113
DOI: No ID Found -
Pharmacogenomics Mar 2022Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is a rising scientific area in many countries, such as Brazil. To identify biomarkers, therapeutic areas, probe drugs and regions/ethnicities... (Review)
Review
Pharmacogenomics (PGx) is a rising scientific area in many countries, such as Brazil. To identify biomarkers, therapeutic areas, probe drugs and regions/ethnicities most studied in the country in order to guide future studies. Systematic review of 1060 studies (from 1968 to 2020) comprising 80 genes, six probe drugs and 3,819,233 individuals. and were the most studied genes and metoprolol and dextromethorphan the most studied probe drugs. Oncology was the most studied therapeutic area considering PGx biomarkers. The country's regions and ethnic groups were studied unevenly, with south/southeast and White people over-represented in respect to their demographic relevance, in detriment of the center-west/northeast/north and Black/mixed individuals. Many of the gaps and possible paths to be covered to reach even PGx data are pointed out by this review.
Topics: Brazil; Ethnicity; HLA-B Antigens; Humans; Medical Oncology; Pharmacogenetics
PubMed: 35187980
DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2021-0128 -
British Journal of Anaesthesia Aug 2019Intense pain can last several days after tonsillectomy. It is often undertreated and improved analgesic strategies that can be safely used at home are needed. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Intense pain can last several days after tonsillectomy. It is often undertreated and improved analgesic strategies that can be safely used at home are needed.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of systemic medications used for post-tonsillectomy pain in adult and adolescent (13 yr old) patients. Studies were identified from PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and by hand searching reference lists from studies and review articles. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies reporting on pain intensity or use of rescue analgesia were included.
RESULTS
Twenty-nine randomised controlled trials representing 1816 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Follow-up time was ≤24 h in 15 studies, in which the majority were taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Thirteen studies were suitable for meta-analysis. In pooled analysis, paracetamol, dexamethasone, and gabapentinoids reduced pain intensity on the day of operation. In individual studies, ketoprofen, ibuprofen, lornoxicam, parecoxib, rofecoxib, indomethacin and dextromethorphan reduced pain intensity, need for rescue analgesics, or both on the day of operation. Oral celecoxib for 2 postoperative weeks or i.v. ketamine on the day of operation were not effective at the studied doses. Dexamethasone in multiple doses provided analgesia beyond 1 postoperative day. Pain was moderate to strong in both study and control groups during the first postoperative week.
CONCLUSIONS
Single analgesics and dexamethasone provide only a weak to moderate effect for post-tonsillectomy pain on the day of operation and thus a multimodal analgesic strategy is recommended. Short follow-up times and clinical heterogeneity of studies limit the usefulness of results.
Topics: Adult; Analgesics; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Dexamethasone; Humans; Pain, Postoperative; Tonsillectomy
PubMed: 31221427
DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.04.063 -
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and... Sep 2021Over-the-counter (OTC) medicines are typically safe. However, there is evidence that OTC medicines can sometimes cause harm as a result of their misuse, abuse and... (Review)
Review
A mixed-methods systematic review of the prevalence, reasons, associated harms and risk-reduction interventions of over-the-counter (OTC) medicines misuse, abuse and dependence in adults.
BACKGROUND
Over-the-counter (OTC) medicines are typically safe. However, there is evidence that OTC medicines can sometimes cause harm as a result of their misuse, abuse and dependence.
AIM OF THE REVIEW
To review the literature on OTC medicines misuse, abuse and dependence in adults and identify the implicated medicines, contributing factors, associated harms and risk-mitigating interventions.
METHODS
Following PRISMA guidelines, electronic databases including Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycINFO Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched for peer-reviewed journal articles published in English between January 2011 and March 2019. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies assessing aspects of misuse, abuse and dependence of OTC medicines in individuals aged 18 years or more were included. Studies that solely focused on adolescents only, doping in sports or abuse of OTC medicines in people who are substance abusers were excluded. The random effect meta-analysis model was used to pool the prevalence among the population-based studies.
RESULTS
Of 2355 peer-reviewed studies initially identified, 53 were included in this review. According to the study design, the prevalence varied, but the overall pooled prevalence in the population-based studies was: 16.2% for misuse, 2.0% for abuse, and 7.2% for dependence. The common OTC medicines groups involved in the problematic use were analgesics (with or without codeine), sedative antihistamines, cough mixtures containing dextromethorphan. Physical, psychological, social and financial harms were associated with problematic use of OTC medicines in addition to hospitalisation and death. Interventions for the affected individuals were provided mainly through the community pharmacies, general practices and specialised addiction centres.
CONCLUSION
The problematic use of OTC medicines is quite prevalent in adults, necessitating raising public awareness about their safe use. In addition, innovative harm minimisation models need to be developed, evaluated and implemented across health care settings.
PubMed: 34517925
DOI: 10.1186/s40545-021-00350-7 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jan 2010Cough causes concern for parents and is a major cause of outpatient visits. It can impact on quality of life, cause anxiety and affect sleep in parents and children.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cough causes concern for parents and is a major cause of outpatient visits. It can impact on quality of life, cause anxiety and affect sleep in parents and children. Several remedies, including honey, have been used to alleviate cough symptoms.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness of honey for acute cough in children in ambulatory settings.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2009, issue 2) which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register; MEDLINE (1950 to April Week 2 2009); EMBASE (1990 to April 2009); CINAHL (1982 to April 2009); Web of Science (2000 to April 2009); AMED (1985 to April 2009); and LILACS (1982 to April 2009).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCT) comparing honey given alone or in combination with antibiotics versus nothing, placebo or other over-the-counter (OTC) cough medications to participants aged from two to 18 years for acute cough in ambulatory settings.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened search results for eligible studies and extracted data on reported outcomes. Trial authors of the included study were contacted for additional information on unpublished data.
MAIN RESULTS
One RCT of 108 children with upper respiratory tract infections comparing the effect of honey, dextromethorphan and no treatment on cough and sleep quality for coughing children and their parents was included. Comparing symptoms and sleep quality scores of children that received honey with those that received no treatment showed that honey was more effective in reducing frequency of cough (mean difference (MD) -0.99; 95% CI -1.63 to -0.35, bothersome cough (MD -0.93; 95% CI -1.76 to -0.10), and sleep quality of the child (MD -0.92; 95% CI -1.77 to -0.07); but did not differ significantly between the honey versus no treatment groups in resolving severity of cough (MD -0.69; 95% CI -1.46 to 0.07) and sleep quality of the parents (MD 0.80; 95% CI -1.67 to 0.07). Dextromethorphan and honey did not differ significantly on cough frequency (MD -0.49; 95% CI -1.15 to 0.17); cough severity (MD -0.50; 95% CI -1.28 to 0.29), bothersome cough (MD -0.29; 95% CI -1.14 to 0.56) and sleep quality of the children (MD -0.70; 95% CI -1.57 to 0.17) or their parents (MD -0.34; 95% CI -1.24 to 0.55).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We found insufficient evidence to advise for or against the use of honey for acute cough in children.
Topics: Antitussive Agents; Apitherapy; Child; Cough; Dextromethorphan; Humans; Sleep Wake Disorders
PubMed: 20091616
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007094.pub2 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Mar 2012Cough causes concern for parents and is a major cause of outpatient visits. It can impact on quality of life, cause anxiety and affect sleep in parents and children.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Cough causes concern for parents and is a major cause of outpatient visits. It can impact on quality of life, cause anxiety and affect sleep in parents and children. Several remedies, including honey, have been used to alleviate cough symptoms.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the effectiveness of honey for acute cough in children in ambulatory settings.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2011) which contains the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register; MEDLINE (1950 to December week 4, 2011); EMBASE (1990 to January 2012); CINAHL (1981 to January 2012); Web of Science (2000 to January 2012); AMED (1985 to January 2012); LILACS (1982 to January 2012); and CAB abstracts (2009 to January 2012).
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing honey given alone, or in combination with antibiotics, versus nothing, placebo or other over-the-counter (OTC) cough medications to participants aged from two to 18 years for acute cough in ambulatory settings.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened search results for eligible studies and extracted data on reported outcomes.
MAIN RESULTS
We included two RCTs of high risk of bias involving 265 children. The studies compared the effect of honey with dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine and 'no treatment' on symptomatic relief of cough using the 7-point Likert scale.Honey was better than 'no treatment' in reducing frequency of cough (mean difference (MD) -1.07; 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.53 to -0.60; two studies; 154 participants). Moderate quality evidence suggests honey did not differ significantly from dextromethorphan in reducing cough frequency (MD -0.07; 95% CI -1.07 to 0.94; two studies; 149 participants). Low quality evidence suggests honey may be slightly better than diphenhydramine in reducing cough frequency (MD -0.57; 95% CI -0.90 to -0.24; one study; 80 participants).Adverse events included mild reactions (nervousness, insomnia and hyperactivity) experienced by seven children (9.3%) from the honey group and two (2.7%) from the dextromethorphan group; the difference was not significant (risk ratio (RR) 2.94; 95% Cl 0.74 to 11.71; two studies; 149 participants). Three children (7.5%) in the diphenhydramine group experienced somnolence (RR 0.14; 95% Cl 0.01 to 2.68; one study; 80 participants) but there was no significant difference between honey versus dextromethorphan or honey versus diphenhydramine. No adverse event was reported in the 'no treatment' group.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Honey may be better than 'no treatment' and diphenhydramine in the symptomatic relief of cough but not better than dextromethorphan. There is no strong evidence for or against the use of honey.
Topics: Adolescent; Antitussive Agents; Apitherapy; Child; Child, Preschool; Cough; Dextromethorphan; Honey; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 22419319
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007094.pub3 -
Rheumatology International Sep 2012Interleukin 6 (IL-6) plays a central role in the immunopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tocilizumab [TCZ] (an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody) has been shown to... (Review)
Review
Interleukin 6 (IL-6) plays a central role in the immunopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and tocilizumab [TCZ] (an anti-IL-6 receptor antibody) has been shown to be effective in the treatment of the condition. As up-regulation of IL-6 reduces the activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, blockade of this cytokine may enhance CYP function. This may lead to reduced bioavailability of CYP-metabolized drugs. Due to the increasing use of TCZ, we undertook a systematic literature review to explore such interactions. Our search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, FDA and EMEA websites for in vitro and in vivo studies, clinical trials and reviews mentioning TCZ and CYP on the basis of the title and abstract. Appropriate articles were further screened based on full-text review to select only those reporting IL-6, TCZ and their potential interaction with CYP-metabolized drugs. Two in vitro studies showed that TCZ-reversed IL-6 induced reduction of CYP isozymes. CYP3A4 mRNA expression was most reduced by IL-6 followed by CYP2C9 and CYP2C19. This change was prevented with TCZ. Three clinical studies investigated the interaction showing simvastatin (CYP3A4 substrate) bioavailability reduced by TCZ and omeprazole bioavailability was decreased by TCZ-induced CYP2C19 activity. The bioavailability of dextromethorphan (CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 substrates) was shown to be unaffected by TCZ treatment. The observed increase in CYP isozyme activity by TCZ is of clinical relevance as the bioavailability of the CYP isozyme substrates were decreased in vivo. As CYP3A4 is the isozyme responsible for the largest proportion of drug metabolism, it is probable that the bioavailability of other drugs may be reduced by TCZ. Thus, clinicians should exercise caution when co-prescribing TCZ and CYP-metabolized drugs. More studies are required to investigate this interaction further.
Topics: Antibodies, Anti-Idiotypic; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Interactions; Humans; Interleukin-6; Receptors, Interleukin-6
PubMed: 22451032
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-012-2423-3 -
Drugs Oct 2013Both chronic and acute pain have been cited as the most common symptoms amongst patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), with recent prevalence estimates as high as 83 %.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Both chronic and acute pain have been cited as the most common symptoms amongst patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), with recent prevalence estimates as high as 83 %. The evidence for spasticity and trigeminal neuralgia pharmacological treatments in MS has been systematically reviewed, but no equivalent reviews have been published concerning MS pain unrelated to these two conditions.
OBJECTIVE
Our objective was to systematically review pain management strategies for the reduction of non-spastic and non-trigeminal neuralgic pain in MS patients.
DATA SOURCES
Experimental studies published after 1965 were chosen for review by searching electronic databases (e.g. PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Science Citation Index Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science, and clinicaltrials.gov) and bibliographies/citations of previously published reviews.
STUDY SELECTION
Studies were included if all participants were adults clinically diagnosed with MS, study sample was not restricted to participants with spasticity or trigeminal neuralgia, and participant-reported pain was a primary or secondary outcome measured with a validated tool.
STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS
Records were screened and methodological qualities of included studies were assessed independently by two reviewers under the supervision of another reviewer using the principles recommended in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Review of Interventions and the levels of evidence espoused by the American Academy of Neurology.
RESULTS
Fifteen studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria for review; interventions included antidepressants, anticonvulsants, dextromethorphan/quinidine, cannabinoids, and opioids/opioid antagonists. The pooled effect size for anticonvulsants (4 studies, 78 participants) was -1.88 (95 % CI: -3.13 to -0.64). The pooled effect size for cannabinoids (3 studies, 565 participants) was 0.08 (95 % CI: -0.74 to 0.89). Overall, only four trials reported Class 1 evidence. For these trials, dizziness was the most commonly reported adverse event, followed by nausea and somnolence.
LIMITATIONS
The relatively small number of trials in MS patients with chronic pain precludes specific recommendations for treatment strategies. The review did not reveal any studies of drug combinations.
CONCLUSIONS
More trials with rigorous design and reporting are needed to determine effective treatments for specific pain types presenting in people living with MS.
Topics: Analgesics; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Cannabinoids; Chronic Pain; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Neuralgia; Pain Management; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24085618
DOI: 10.1007/s40265-013-0125-0