-
European Journal of Preventive... Jul 2021Bempedoic acid is a novel oral drug, which has been increasingly researched to play an important role in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia recently. However, results... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
Bempedoic acid is a novel oral drug, which has been increasingly researched to play an important role in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia recently. However, results from original studies were inconsistent and inconclusive. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to quantitatively appraise the efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from inception to 30 January 2020. We included randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy and safety of bempedoic acid with placebo in patients with hypercholesterolemia. Results from trials were presented as mean differences or odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and were pooled by random or fixed effects model. The risk of bias and heterogeneity among trials were also assessed and analyzed.
RESULTS
Pooled analysis of 10 eligible trials showed that bempedoic acid treatment resulted in greater lowering of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level than the placebo group (mean difference -23.16%, 95% CI -26.92% to -19.04%). We also found that improvements in lipid parameters and biomarkers were still maintained at weeks 24 and 52 from the long-term trials. As for safety, bempedoic acid did not increase the risk of overall adverse events (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.18). However, the incidence of adverse events leading to discontinuation was higher in the bempedoic acid group (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.82).
CONCLUSIONS
Available evidence from randomized controlled trials suggests that bempedoic acid provides a well-tolerated and effective therapeutic option for lipid lowering in patients with hyperlipidemia.
Topics: Dicarboxylic Acids; Fatty Acids; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hyperlipidemias; Hypolipidemic Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34298558
DOI: 10.1177/2047487320930585 -
Cardiovascular Diabetology Aug 2020Bempedoic acid is an oral, once-daily, first-in-class drug being developed for the treatment of hyperlipidemia. However, evidence of bempedoic acid use for the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Bempedoic acid is an oral, once-daily, first-in-class drug being developed for the treatment of hyperlipidemia. However, evidence of bempedoic acid use for the prevention of cardiovascular events and diabetes is lacking. Thus, we aim to evaluate the benefit and safety of bempedoic acid use for the prevention of cardiovascular events and diabetes.
METHODS
We searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials with no language restriction from inception until March 3, 2020. Pairs of reviewers independently identified randomized controlled trials comparing the use of bempedoic acid with placebo or no treatment for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in statin-intolerant patients with hypercholesterolemia. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events, and percent change in LDL-C.
RESULTS
We identified 11 trials including a total of 4391 participants. Bempedoic acid use was associated with a reduction in composite cardiovascular outcome (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.56-0.99; I = 0%). Bempedoic acid reduced LDL-C levels (MD - 22.91, 95% CI - 27.35 to - 18.47; I = 99%), and similarly reduced CRP levels (MD -24.70, 95% CI - 32.10 to - 17.30; I = 53%). Bempedoic acid was associated with a reduction in rates of new-onset or worsening diabetes (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.44-0.96; I = 23%).
CONCLUSIONS
Bempedoic acid in patients with hypercholesterolemia was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events and diabetes.
Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol, LDL; Diabetes Mellitus; Dicarboxylic Acids; Down-Regulation; Fatty Acids; Female; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hypolipidemic Agents; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32787939
DOI: 10.1186/s12933-020-01101-9 -
Nutrients Nov 2023Pooled data from published reports on infants with clinically diagnosed vitamin B12 (B12) deficiency were analyzed with the purpose of describing the presentation,... (Review)
Review
Pooled data from published reports on infants with clinically diagnosed vitamin B12 (B12) deficiency were analyzed with the purpose of describing the presentation, diagnostic approaches, and risk factors for the condition to inform prevention strategies. An electronic (PubMed database) and manual literature search following the PRISMA approach was conducted (preregistration with the Open Science Framework, accessed on 15 February 2023). Data were described and analyzed using correlation analyses, Chi-square tests, ANOVAs, and regression analyses, and 102 publications (292 cases) were analyzed. The mean age at first symptoms (anemia, various neurological symptoms) was four months; the mean time to diagnosis was 2.6 months. Maternal B12 at diagnosis, exclusive breastfeeding, and a maternal diet low in B12 predicted infant B12, methylmalonic acid, and total homocysteine. Infant B12 deficiency is still not easily diagnosed. Methylmalonic acid and total homocysteine are useful diagnostic parameters in addition to B12 levels. Since maternal B12 status predicts infant B12 status, it would probably be advantageous to target women in early pregnancy or even preconceptionally to prevent infant B12 deficiency, rather than to rely on newborn screening that often does not reliably identify high-risk children.
Topics: Infant; Infant, Newborn; Pregnancy; Child; Humans; Female; Methylmalonic Acid; Vitamin B 12 Deficiency; Vitamin B 12; Breast Feeding; Homocysteine
PubMed: 38068819
DOI: 10.3390/nu15234960 -
The British Journal of Dermatology Aug 2016Fumaric acid esters (FAEs) are increasingly used as a systemic treatment for psoriasis, but there are still uncertainties regarding their suitability. The objective of... (Review)
Review
Fumaric acid esters (FAEs) are increasingly used as a systemic treatment for psoriasis, but there are still uncertainties regarding their suitability. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the evidence for the efficacy and safety of FAEs in psoriasis treatment. A systematic literature search was performed in seven databases up to 17 August 2015. Inclusion criteria were studies that reported clinical effects of FAEs in patients with psoriasis without restrictions in study design, language or publication date. Methodological quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and overall level of quality were assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, respectively. A total of 68 articles were included. There were seven RCTs (total 449 patients) that had an unclear risk of bias and were too clinically heterogeneous to allow a meta-analysis. Overall, mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index decreased by 42-65% following 12-16 weeks of treatment. There were 37 observational studies (a total of 3457 patients) that supported the RCT findings, but most were uncontrolled with a high risk of bias. Commonly reported adverse events included gastrointestinal complaints and flushing, leading to treatment withdrawal in 6-40% of patients. Several case-reports described rare adverse events, such as renal Fanconi syndrome and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. There was a lack of studies focusing on long-term use and comparisons with other treatments. This review concluded that there is low-quality evidence to recommend the use of oral FAEs to treat plaque psoriasis in adult patients. Studies focusing on long-term safety and comparison with systemic psoriasis treatments could lead to a better understanding of the role of FAEs as a treatment for psoriasis.
Topics: Dermatologic Agents; Fumarates; Humans; Observational Studies as Topic; Patient Safety; Psoriasis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26919824
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14500 -
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease Nov 2015Newborn screening (NBS) is justified if early intervention is effective in a disorder generally not detected early in life on a clinical basis, and if sensitive and... (Review)
Review
Newborn screening (NBS) is justified if early intervention is effective in a disorder generally not detected early in life on a clinical basis, and if sensitive and specific biochemical markers exist. Experience with NBS for homocystinurias and methylation disorders is limited. However, there is robust evidence for the success of early treatment with diet, betaine and/or pyridoxine for CBS deficiency and good evidence for the success of early betaine treatment in severe MTHFR deficiency. These conditions can be screened in dried blood spots by determining methionine (Met), methionine-to-phenylanine (Met/Phe) ratio, and total homocysteine (tHcy) as a second tier marker. Therefore, we recommend NBS for cystathionine beta-synthase and severe MTHFR deficiency. Weaker evidence is available for the disorders of intracellular cobalamin metabolism. Early treatment is clearly of advantage for patients with the late-onset cblC defect. In the early-onset type, survival and non-neurological symptoms improve but the effect on neurocognitive development is uncertain. The cblC defect can be screened by measuring propionylcarnitine, propionylcarnitine-to-acetylcarnitine ratio combined with the second tier markers methylmalonic acid and tHcy. For the cblE and cblG defects, evidence for the benefit of early treatment is weaker; and data on performance of Met, Met/Phe and tHcy even more limited. Individuals homozygous or compound heterozygous for MAT1A mutations may benefit from detection by NBS using Met, which on the other hand also detects asymptomatic heterozygotes. Clinical and laboratory data is insufficient to develop any recommendation on NBS for the cblD, cblF, cblJ defects, glycineN-methyltransferase-, S-adenosylhomocysteinehydrolase- and adenosine kinase deficiency.
Topics: Acetylcarnitine; Betaine; Carnitine; Homocystinuria; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Methionine; Methylation; Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2); Methylmalonic Acid; Neonatal Screening; Practice Guidelines as Topic
PubMed: 25762406
DOI: 10.1007/s10545-015-9830-z -
Journal of Proteome Research Jul 2017Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a complex disease posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Metabonomics may aid in the diagnosis of AAA, determination of... (Review)
Review
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a complex disease posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Metabonomics may aid in the diagnosis of AAA, determination of individualized risk, discovery of therapeutic targets, and improve understanding of pathogenesis. A systematic review of the diversity and outcomes of existing AAA metabonomic research has been performed. Original research studies applying metabonomics to human aneurysmal disease are included. Seven relevant articles were identified: four studies were based on plasma/serum metabolite profiling, and three studies examined aneurysmal tissue. Aminomalonic acid, guanidinosuccinic acid, and glycerol emerge as potential plasma biomarkers of large aneurysm. Lipid profiling improves predictive models of aneurysm presence. Patterns of metabolite variation associated with AAA relate to carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Perioperative perturbations in metabolites suggest differential systemic inflammatory responses to surgery, generating hypotheses for adjunctive perioperative therapy. Significant limitations include small study sizes, lack of correction for multiple testing false discovery rates, and single time-point sampling. Metabolic profiling carries the potential to identify biomarkers of AAA and elucidate pathways underlying aneurysmal disease. Statistically and methodologically robust studies are required for validation, addressing the hiatus in understanding mechanisms of aneurysm growth and developing effective treatment strategies.
Topics: Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; Biomarkers; Disease Progression; Glycerol; Guanidines; Humans; Lipoxins; Malonates; Metabolome; Metabolomics; Prognosis; Succinates; Thromboxane B2
PubMed: 28287739
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00894 -
Drug Safety Aug 2020Bempedoic acid (ETC-1002) is a first-in-class lipid-lowering agent recently approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Bempedoic acid (ETC-1002) is a first-in-class lipid-lowering agent recently approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for commercialization.
OBJECTIVE
The aim was to assess, through a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of the available phase 2 and phase 3 clinical studies, the effect of treatment with bempedoic acid on serum uric acid (SUA) concentration. Secondary outcomes were treatment-related variations in creatinine serum level and incidence of gout.
METHODS
A systematic literature search in SCOPUS, PubMed Medline, ISI Web of Science and Google Scholar databases was conducted up to November 13th, 2019, in order to identify clinical trials potentially eligible for the meta-analysis. Effect sizes were expressed as absolute mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
Data were pooled from four clinical studies comprising ten arms, which included overall 3369 subjects, with 2213 in the active-treatment arm and 1156 in the control one. Meta-analysis of data suggested that treatment with bempedoic acid is related to a significant increase in SUA (MD 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.91, P < 0.001), serum creatinine (MD 0.04, 95% CI 0.03-0.05, P < 0.001) and the incidence of gout (odds ratio 3.56, 95% CI 1.24-10.19, P = 0.018). The relatively small number of subjects involved in the studies and the exclusion of patients with renal impairment from the clinical trials are important limitations of the meta-analysis. However, our data indicate potential safety issues with bempedoic acid and suggest that further studies are performed both to elucidate the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying these associations and to verify the long-term safety of this treatment.
CONCLUSION
Bempedoic acid seems to have unfavourable effects on SUA, creatinine level and the incidence of gout. The ongoing Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial (CVOT) will explore the longer-term safety of treatment with bempedoic acid and clarify its effect on cardiovascular events and mortality.
PROSPERO DATABASE REGISTRATION
CRD42019146126.
Topics: Humans; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dicarboxylic Acids; Fatty Acids; Hypolipidemic Agents; Treatment Outcome; Uric Acid
PubMed: 32358698
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-020-00931-6 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2018Fibromyalgia is a chronic widespread pain condition affecting millions of people worldwide. Current pharmacotherapies are often ineffective and poorly tolerated.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Fibromyalgia is a chronic widespread pain condition affecting millions of people worldwide. Current pharmacotherapies are often ineffective and poorly tolerated. Combining different agents could provide superior pain relief and possibly also fewer side effects.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of combination pharmacotherapy compared to monotherapy or placebo, or both, for the treatment of fibromyalgia pain in adults.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase to September 2017. We also searched reference lists of other reviews and trials registries.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Double-blind, randomised controlled trials comparing combinations of two or more drugs to placebo or other comparators, or both, for the treatment of fibromyalgia pain.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
From all studies, we extracted data on: participant-reported pain relief of 30% or 50% or greater; patient global impression of clinical change (PGIC) much or very much improved or very much improved; any other pain-related outcome of improvement; withdrawals (lack of efficacy, adverse events), participants experiencing any adverse event, serious adverse events, and specific adverse events (e.g. somnolence and dizziness). The primary comparison was between combination and one or all single-agent comparators. We also assessed the evidence using GRADE and created a 'Summary of findings' table.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified 16 studies with 1474 participants. Three studies combined a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) with a benzodiazepine (306 participants); two combined amitriptyline with fluoxetine (89 participants); two combined amitriptyline with a different agent (92 participants); two combined melatonin with an antidepressant (164 participants); one combined carisoprodol, paracetamol (acetaminophen), and caffeine (58 participants); one combined tramadol and paracetamol (acetaminophen) (315 participants); one combined malic acid and magnesium (24 participants); one combined a monoamine oxidase inhibitor with 5-hydroxytryptophan (200 participants); and one combined pregabalin with duloxetine (41 participants). Six studies compared the combination of multiple agents with each component alone and with inactive placebo; three studies compared combination pharmacotherapy with each individual component but did not include an inactive placebo group; two studies compared the combination of two agents with only one of the agents alone; and three studies compared the combination of two or more agents only with inactive placebo.Heterogeneity among studies in terms of class of agents evaluated, specific combinations used, outcomes reported, and doses given prevented any meta-analysis. None of the combinations of drugs found provided sufficient data for analysis compared with placebo or other comparators for our preferred outcomes. We therefore provide a narrative description of results. There was no or inadequate evidence in any comparison for primary and secondary outcomes. Two studies only reported any primary outcomes of interest (patient-reported pain relief of 30%, or 50%, or greater). For each 'Risk of bias' item, only half or fewer of studies had unequivocal low risk of bias. Small size and selective reporting were common as high risk of bias.Our GRADE assessment was therefore very low for primary outcomes of pain relief of 30% or 50% or greater, PGIC much or very much improved or very much improved, any pain-related outcome, participants experiencing any adverse event, any serious adverse event, or withdrawing because of an adverse event.Three studies found some evidence that combination pharmacotherapy reduced pain compared to monotherapy; these trials tested three different combinations: melatonin and amitriptyline, fluoxetine and amitriptyline, and pregabalin and duloxetine. Adverse events experienced by participants were not serious, and where they were reported (in 12 out of 16 studies), all participants experienced them, regardless of treatment. Common adverse events were nausea, dizziness, somnolence, and headache.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There are few, large, high-quality trials comparing combination pharmacotherapy with monotherapy for fibromyalgia, consequently limiting evidence to support or refute the use of combination pharmacotherapy for fibromyalgia.
Topics: 5-Hydroxytryptophan; Acetaminophen; Adult; Amitriptyline; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Antidepressive Agents; Benzodiazepines; Carisoprodol; Drug Therapy, Combination; Duloxetine Hydrochloride; Fibromyalgia; Fluoxetine; Humans; Magnesium; Malates; Melatonin; Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors; Muscle Relaxants, Central; Pregabalin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 29457627
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010585.pub2 -
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy Jul 2020Although several lipid-lowering drugs are available, they are not sufficient for some patients. Bempedoic acid is a small molecule adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase...
INTRODUCTION
Although several lipid-lowering drugs are available, they are not sufficient for some patients. Bempedoic acid is a small molecule adenosine triphosphate-citrate lyase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of adults with hypercholesterolemia.
AREAS COVERED
We performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed database, and the following keywords were used: 'bempedoic acid,' 'hypercholesterolemia,' and 'adenosine triphosphate citrate lyase.' The chemical property, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of bempedoic acid are introduced in this paper.
EXPERT OPINION
Bempedoic acid can modulate the metabolism of cholesterol. Clinical trials indicated that bempedoic acid could significantly reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Bempedoic acid was well tolerated.
Topics: Cholesterol; Dicarboxylic Acids; Fatty Acids; Humans; Hypercholesterolemia; Hypolipidemic Agents; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32532162
DOI: 10.1080/14779072.2020.1782744 -
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Jan 2024Combined methylmalonic acidemia and homocystinuria, cblC type is an inborn error of intracellular cobalamin metabolism and the most common one. The age of onset ranges... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Combined methylmalonic acidemia and homocystinuria, cblC type is an inborn error of intracellular cobalamin metabolism and the most common one. The age of onset ranges from prenatal to adult. The disease is characterised by an elevation of methylmalonic acid (MMA) and homocysteine and a decreased production of methionine. The aim is to review existing scientific literature of all late onset cblC patients in terms of clinical symptoms, diagnosis, and outcome.
METHODS
A bibliographic database search was undertaken in PubMed (MEDLINE) complemented by a reference list search. We combined search terms regarding cblC disease and late onset. Two review authors performed the study selection, data extraction and quality assessment.
RESULTS
Of the sixty-five articles included in this systematic review, we collected a total of 199 patients. The most frequent clinical symptoms were neuropathy/myelopathy, encephalopathy, psychiatric symptoms, thrombotic microangiopathy, seizures, kidney disease, mild to severe pulmonary hypertension with heart failure and thrombotic phenomena. There were different forms of supplementation used in the different studies collected and, within these studies, some patients received several treatments sequentially and/or concomitantly. The general outcome was: 64 patients recovered, 78 patients improved, 4 patients did not improve, or the disease progressed, and 12 patients died.
CONCLUSIONS
Most scientific literature regarding the late onset cblC disease comes from case reports and case series. In most cases treatment initiation led to an improvement and even recovery of some patients. The lack of complete recovery underlines the necessity for increased vigilance in unclear clinical symptoms for cblC disease.
Topics: Adult; Female; Pregnancy; Humans; Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn Errors; Hyperhomocysteinemia; Homocystinuria; Methylmalonic Acid; Vitamin B 12
PubMed: 38245797
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03021-3