-
European Journal of Preventive... Aug 2023In acute aortic dissection (AAD) sex heterogeneity reports are not exhaustive and in part even conflicting. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
In acute aortic dissection (AAD) sex heterogeneity reports are not exhaustive and in part even conflicting.
AIMS
To explore sex differences in clinical features, management, and outcomes among patients with type A AAD.
METHODS AND RESULTS
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature were conducted for studies (2004-2022) reporting type A AAD sex differences. Among the 1938 studies retrieved, 16 (16 069 patients, 7142 women, and 8927 men) fulfilled all eligibility criteria. Data were aggregated used the random-effects model as pooled risk ratio and mean difference. Due to information reported by considered manuscripts, analysis were performed only among surgically treated type A AAD patients. At the time of hospital presentation type A AAD women were older than men but had lower body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), and creatinine plasma levels. Active smoking, bicuspid aortic valve, and previous cardiac surgery were less common in women while diabetes mellitus was more frequent. Furthermore, women experienced more frequently pericardial effusion/cardiac tamponade than men. Interestingly, in-hospital surgical mortality did not differ between sexes [risk ratio (RR), 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.53-1.99; P = 0.95], whereas 5 (RR 0.94; 95% CI: 0.92-0.97; P < 0.001) and 10-year survival (RR 0.82; 95% CI: 0.74-0.92; P = 0.004) was higher among men. A descriptive analysis of in-hospital outcomes among medically treated type A AAD patients confirmed prohibitive high mortality for both sexes (men 58.6% vs. women 53.8%, P = 0.59).
CONCLUSIONS
A female sex phenotype appears to be evident in type A AAD implying the need for a personalized management patient approach along with tailored preventive strategies.
PROSPERO REGISTRY ID
CRD42022359072.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Aortic Aneurysm; Treatment Outcome; Sex Characteristics; Aortic Dissection; Hospital Mortality; Acute Disease; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36629802
DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad009 -
The Journal of Maternal-fetal &... Dec 2022Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is responsible of one fifth of cases of ischemic stroke, but is uncommon during pregnancy or the early postpartum period and evidence...
BACKGROUND
Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) is responsible of one fifth of cases of ischemic stroke, but is uncommon during pregnancy or the early postpartum period and evidence is derived from published case reports and case series.
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review with a prospectively registered protocol was conducted to study the clinical presentation, management and prognosis of this condition.
METHODS
Ovid-Medline, PubMed Central, and CINAHL were searched without language restriction.
RESULTS
Fifty-seven articles (50 case reports and seven case series) reporting on 77 patients were included. The mean age was 33.7 years. The main possible risk factors identified were migraine, hyperlipidemia, connective tissue disorders, preeclampsia and eclampsia, HELLP syndrome and prolonged second stage of labor. Headache was the most frequent symptom, followed by neck pain. Acute medical treatments included anticoagulation, antiplatelets, and endovascular therapy. No patients received thrombolysis. The overall prognosis was good with 77.8% of patients making full clinical recovery.
CONCLUSIONS
Cervical artery dissection is a rare, but an important complication of pregnancy and puerperium. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion. The strong association with hypertensive and connective tissue disorders requires further research.
Topics: Adult; Female; Humans; Pregnancy; HELLP Syndrome; Postpartum Period; Pre-Eclampsia; Vertebral Artery Dissection; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular; Risk Factors
PubMed: 36176066
DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2022.2122799 -
Interventional Neuroradiology : Journal... Mar 2023Traumatic posterior cerebral artery (tPCA) dissection and dissecting aneurysms are rare and constitute a challenging clinical entity. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Traumatic posterior cerebral artery (tPCA) dissection and dissecting aneurysms are rare and constitute a challenging clinical entity.
OBJECTIVE
We analyze existing literature on tPCA dissection and present our institutional experience.
METHODS
We retrospectively queried our database for tPCA isolated dissection or dissecting aneurysms from 2008 until now and conducted a systematic literature review of published cases. We analyzed the clinical and radiographic characteristics and treatment outcomes of tPCA dissection.
RESULTS
Including our case, a total of 11 cases with either isolated dissection ( = 2) or dissecting aneurysms ( = 9) were included. The median age was 27 years, and 45% were females. The median interval between trauma and tPCA dissection diagnosis was nine days. Mental status declined in four (36%) patients. Half of the patients demonstrated tentorial subdural hematoma on head CT. Ischemic stroke was detected in three (43%) patients. Four (36%) patients were conservatively managed, one (9.1%) patient was treated with surgical clipping of the proximal PCA, and six patients underwent endovascular treatments. The complication rate was 20%. Immediate total occlusion was demonstrated in five patients (100%), and the conservatively managed case showed immediate, spontaneous thrombosis of the aneurysm. Glasgow Coma Scale scores were 15 in eight (89%) and 14 in one (11%) patients at the last clinical follow-up with a median of six months. The mortality and retreatment rates were null.
CONCLUSIONS
tPCA dissection is diagnosed late and commonly affects the young population. The clinical outcome for this condition is typically favorable. Current endovascular techniques showed considerable efficacy and safety.
PubMed: 36883231
DOI: 10.1177/15910199231162487 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2015The acute event of thoracic aortic dissection carries with it high mortality and morbidity. Despite optimal initial surgical or medical management strategies, the risk... (Review)
Review
The acute event of thoracic aortic dissection carries with it high mortality and morbidity. Despite optimal initial surgical or medical management strategies, the risk of further complications in the long-term, including aneurysmal dilatation and false lumen (FL) expansion, are not insignificant. Adequate follow-up of such conditions requires dedicated imaging where relevant prognostic indicators are accurately assessed. We perform a systematic review of the literature and report the current evidence for the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessment of chronic aortic dissection. We then make a comparison with traditional imaging modalities including computed tomography and echocardiography. We discuss new ways in which MRI may extend existing aortic assessment, including identification of blood-flow dynamics within the TL and FL using phase-contrast imaging.
PubMed: 26664877
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2015.00005 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Nov 2021The standard surgical approach to Stanford type A aortic dissection is open repair. However, up to one in four patients will be declined surgery because of prohibitive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The standard surgical approach to Stanford type A aortic dissection is open repair. However, up to one in four patients will be declined surgery because of prohibitive risk. Patients who are treated nonoperatively have an unacceptably high mortality. Endovascular repair of the ascending aorta is emerging as an alternative treatment for a select group of patients. The reported rates of technical success, mortality, stroke, and reintervention have varied. The objective of the study was to systematically report outcomes for acute type A dissections repaired using an endovascular approach.
METHODS
The systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. We performed online literature database searches through April 2020. The demographic and procedural characteristics of the individual studies were tabulated. Data on technical success, short-term mortality, stroke, and reintervention were extracted and underwent meta-analysis using a random effects model.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies with 80 cases of aortic dissection (55 acute and 25 subacute) were included in the final analysis. A wide variation was found in technique and device design across the studies. The outcomes rates were estimated at 17% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-26%) for mortality, 15% (95% CI, 8%-23%) for technical failure, 11% (95% CI, 6%-19%) for stroke and 18% (95% CI, 9%-31%) for reintervention. The mean Downs and Black quality assessment score was 13.9 ± 3.2.
CONCLUSIONS
The technique for endovascular repair of type A aortic dissection is feasible and reproducible. The results of our meta-analysis demonstrate an acceptable safety profile for inoperable patients who otherwise would have an extremely poor prognosis. Data from clinical trials are required before the technique can be introduced into routine clinical practice.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aortic Dissection; Aortic Aneurysm; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Clinical Decision-Making; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 33592292
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.01.054 -
WMJ : Official Publication of the State... Sep 2020Recent studies have raised concerns that fluoroquinolone use is associated with an increased risk of aortopathy, including aortic aneurysm with and without dissection. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Recent studies have raised concerns that fluoroquinolone use is associated with an increased risk of aortopathy, including aortic aneurysm with and without dissection.
OBJECTIVE
We performed a meta-analysis with a comprehensive literature review to further investigate this association.
METHODS
This analysis was conducted per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched for studies that included adult patients (age >18 years) exposed to fluoroquinolones or control antibiotics (amoxicillin/any other antibiotic) for urinary tract infection or pneumonia with a primary outcome of aortic aneurysm or dissection. Heterogeneity was calculated using Q statistic I.
RESULTS
A total of 6 studies-comprised of 59% males-were included in our analysis, which showed an increased combined risk of development of aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection with quinolone exposure when compared with controls (relative risk [RR] = 2.11; 95% CI, 1.62 - 2.75; I= 83.700). Individual relative risk for aortic aneurysm (RR = 2.83; 95% CI, 2.02 - 3.95, I = 89.150) and aortic dissection (RR = 1.99; 95% CI, 1.23 - 3.06; I2= 71.33) also were significantly increased.
CONCLUSION
Compared to other antibiotics, the use of fluoroquinolones was associated with a significantly higher risk of aortic aneurysm and dissection combined.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aortic Dissection; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aortic Aneurysm; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Male
PubMed: 33091293
DOI: No ID Found -
The Journal of Thoracic and... Nov 2016Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has been chosen as a less-invasive alternative to open surgery for the treatment of aortic dissections; however, the advantages have... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has been chosen as a less-invasive alternative to open surgery for the treatment of aortic dissections; however, the advantages have been challenged by the postoperative reintervention during the follow-up period. This study aimed at evaluating the incidence, reasons, and potential risk factors for reintervention.
METHODS
Studies reporting reintervention after endovascular repair were identified by searching PubMed and Embase in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, and by reviewing the reference lists of retrieved articles. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analyses were performed to determine the sources of heterogeneity. Funnel plot and Egger's test were used to determine the publication bias.
RESULTS
A total of 27 studies encompassing 2403 patients with aortic dissection were identified. The pooled incidence of reintervention after endovascular repair was 15% (95% confidence interval, 12-19) during 33.7 months of follow-up. The 3 most common reasons for reintervention were endoleak (33.2%), false lumen perfusion and aortic dilation (19.8%), and new dissection (6.9%). The potential factors for reintervention were the mean age of onset and diabetes mellitus determined by performing a single meta-regression analysis (P < .001 and .044, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
Current data suggest that the incidence of reintervention after endovascular therapy is relatively high during midterm follow-up. Advanced age of onset is a risk factor and diabetes mellitus is a protective factor of reintervention after endovascular therapy. The possible mechanism that diabetes mellitus protects patients from reintervention should be explored further.
Topics: Aortic Dissection; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Retreatment; Risk Factors
PubMed: 27453556
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.06.027 -
Cephalalgia : An International Journal... Jun 2011We evaluated the current evidence on the association between migraine, including aura status, and cervical artery dissection. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
We evaluated the current evidence on the association between migraine, including aura status, and cervical artery dissection.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies investigating the association between migraine or migraine subtypes (e.g. migraine with aura) and cervical artery dissection published through October 2010.
RESULTS
We identified five case-control studies investigating the association between migraine and cervical artery dissection. In pooled analysis, migraine doubled the risk of cervical artery dissection (pooled odds ratio [OR]=2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-3.19). All studies allowed evaluation of migraine aura status. While the effect estimate for migraine without aura (pooled OR=1.94, 95% CI 1.21-3.10) was similar to overall migraine, the association was weaker for migraine with aura (pooled OR= 1.50, 95% CI 0.76-2.96). However, there is no evidence that aura status significantly modifies the association between migraine and cervical artery dissection (meta-regression on aura status p= .58). The risk does not appear to differ between women and men; however, only few studies presented gender-specific data. Heterogeneity among studies was low to moderate.
CONCLUSION
In this meta-analysis migraine is associated with a two-fold increased risk of cervical artery dissection. This risk does not appear to significantly differ by migraine aura status or gender.
Topics: Aortic Dissection; Brain; Case-Control Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Migraine Disorders; Risk Factors
PubMed: 21511950
DOI: 10.1177/0333102411401634 -
Annals of Vascular Surgery Jul 2016The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic literature review of isolated spontaneous celiac trunk dissection (ISCTD), to evaluate initial clinical and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic literature review of isolated spontaneous celiac trunk dissection (ISCTD), to evaluate initial clinical and diagnostic aspects, treatment modalities, and outcomes.
METHODS
A retrospective search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, and SciELO databases was performed, using the terms celiac artery dissection, celiac trunk dissection, hepatic artery dissection, splenic artery dissection, or left gastric artery dissection to identify instances of ISCTD. Patients with associated aortic and/or other visceral artery dissection were excluded. When available, the following information was collected from each case: gender, age, associated risk factor, symptoms, diagnostic method, treatment modality, and outcome.
RESULTS
A total of 60 publications were identified between 1987 and 2015, with 11 cases series and 49 case reports, achieving a total of 169 patients identified with ISCTD. Such information was collected: 99 patients were male and 17 female, with an average age of 53.1 years and the most common symptom was abdominal pain. Diagnosis was mainly made with computed tomography. The most common associated conditions were hypertension and smoking in 31% and 23% of the cases, respectively. Conservative treatment was performed in 79% of the cases.
CONCLUSIONS
The profile of patients with ISCTD is male, middle aged, and almost all suffer from abdominal pain. Initial conservative treatment seems adequate for most cases, but a few patients will require interventional treatment. Clinical and radiological long-term follow-up is mandatory, owing to the risk of later progression to aneurysm.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Aortic Dissection; Celiac Artery; Computed Tomography Angiography; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27126716
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.12.009 -
Journal of Cardiac Surgery Oct 2021Type B aortic dissection (TBAD), is defined as a dissection involving the aorta distal to left subclavian artery with the ascending aorta and the aortic arch not... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Type B aortic dissection (TBAD), is defined as a dissection involving the aorta distal to left subclavian artery with the ascending aorta and the aortic arch not affected. TBAD is classified due to the time frame and presence of complications. Complicated TBAD (co-TBAD) patients have a greater mortality rate than uncomplicated TBAD (un-TBAD) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is considered the gold-standard intervention for these clinical challenges.
METHODS
We undertook a systematic review of the literature regarding TEVAR intervention in co-TBAD and un-TBAD. A comprehensive search was undertaken across four major databases and was evaluated and assessed until June 2020.
RESULTS
A total of 16,104 patients were included in the study (7772 patients co-TBAD and 8352 un-TBAD). A significantly higher proportion of comorbidities were seen in co-TBAD patients compared with un-TBAD. Acute dissection was more frequent in the co-TBAD group (73.55% vs. 66.91%), while chronic dissection was more common in un-TBAD patients (33.8% vs. 70.73%). Postprocedure stroke was higher in co-TBAD (5.85% vs. 3.92%; p < .01), while postprocedural renal failure was higher in un-TBAD patients (7.23 vs. 11.38%; p < .01). No difference was observed in in-hospital mortality however the 30 days mortality was higher in the co-TBAD group. One-year survival was higher in the uncomplicated group but this difference was not observed in the 5-year survival.
CONCLUSION
In our analysis we can appreciate that despite significantly higher comorbidities in the co-TBAD cohort, there was no difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups and the 5-year survival did not have any difference.
Topics: Aortic Dissection; Aorta, Thoracic; Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracic; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34310731
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15827