-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2015Blood transfusions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Prophylactic administration of loop diuretics (furosemide, bumetanide, ethacrynic acid, or... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Blood transfusions are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Prophylactic administration of loop diuretics (furosemide, bumetanide, ethacrynic acid, or torsemide) is common practice, especially among people who are at risk for circulatory overload, pulmonary oedema or both.
OBJECTIVES
This review aimed to determine if the prophylactic administration of loop diuretics (furosemide, bumetanide, ethacrynic acid, or torsemide) provides a therapeutic advantage (that is, a favourable risk benefit ratio) in adults and children who are recipients of any blood product transfusion versus placebo, no treatment, or general fluid restriction measures.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 13 January 2015 through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs assessing a loop diuretic in patients receiving any blood transfusion were considered for inclusion.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Results were to be expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes, and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Mean effect sizes were to be calculated using the random-effects models.
MAIN RESULTS
We included four studies that involved 100 participants. Furosemide was the only diuretic investigated in all four studies.None of the included studies assessed the clinically important outcomes noted in our protocol. The studies focused on various markers of respiratory function. An improvement in fraction of inspired oxygen (in favour of furosemide) was noted in one study. An improvement in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (in favour of furosemide) was noted in two studies.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
There was insufficient evidence to determine whether premedicating people undergoing blood transfusion with loop diuretics prevents clinically important transfusion-related morbidity. Due to the continued use of prophylactic loop diuretics during transfusions, and because this review highlights the absence of evidence to justify this practice, well-conducted RCTs are needed. Given the high mortality, severe morbidity and increasing incidence of transfusion-associated circulatory overload, determining the therapeutic utility of pre-transfusion loop diuresis is an urgent need.
Topics: Adult; Body Water; Confidence Intervals; Furosemide; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Pulmonary Edema; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Transfusion Reaction
PubMed: 25685898
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010138.pub2 -
Journal of Intensive Care 2014The background of this study is to determine whether the addition of intravenous colloid to diuretic therapy, in comparison to diuretic therapy alone, improves diuresis...
BACKGROUND
The background of this study is to determine whether the addition of intravenous colloid to diuretic therapy, in comparison to diuretic therapy alone, improves diuresis and oxygenation and prevents intravascular volume depletion in intensive care unit (ICU) patients without shock.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, conference abstracts of ACCP, SCCM, ATS, and references of relevant articles. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adult ICU patients, not in shock (defined as patients on low dose or no vasopressors, without need for IV fluid bolus or blood transfusion within 24 h), comparing intravenous colloid therapy (human albumin, plasma, synthetic starches, or gels) plus diuretic to control (diuretic alone, or diuretic plus placebo). Two reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, assessed quality, and extracted data.
RESULTS
Seven hundred fifty five studies were found in the initial search; 14 were deemed relevant; 2 were found to be eligible. There was good agreement between reviewers for study relevance (k = 0.869) and eligibility (k = 0.811). One study of heart failure patients showed no evidence of improved mean or hourly urine output in the group receiving albumin. The second studied patients hypoproteinemic with ARDS and demonstrated an improved fluid balance in 3 days, improved oxygenation status, and improved serum albumin level in patients treated with albumin. No significant differences were found for other outcomes. No studies evaluating colloids other than albumin were found.
CONCLUSIONS
Our review is limited by the small number of high-quality RCTs available to study this clinical question, both of which only studied albumin. High-quality RCTs are required to evaluate the effect of albumin as well as other colloids as an adjunct to diuresis in a general ICU population.
PubMed: 25960879
DOI: 10.1186/2052-0492-2-37 -
World Journal of Critical Care Medicine May 2022In patients with respiratory failure, loop diuretics remain the cornerstone of the treatment to maintain fluid balance, but resistance is common.
BACKGROUND
In patients with respiratory failure, loop diuretics remain the cornerstone of the treatment to maintain fluid balance, but resistance is common.
AIM
To determine the efficacy and safety of common diuretic combinations in critically ill patients with respiratory failure.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and PROSPERO for studies reporting the effects of a combination of a loop diuretic with another class of diuretic. A meta-analysis using mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was performed for the 24-h fluid balance (primary outcome) and the 24-h urine output, while descriptive statistics were used for safety events.
RESULTS
Nine studies totalling 440 patients from a total of 6510 citations were included. When compared to loop diuretics alone, the addition of a second diuretic is associated with an improved negative fluid balance at 24 h [MD: -1.06 L (95%CI: -1.46; -0.65)], driven by the combination of a thiazide plus furosemide [MD: -1.25 L (95%CI: -1.68; -0.82)], while no difference was observed with the combination of a loop-diuretic plus acetazolamide [MD: -0.40 L (95%CI: -0.96; 0.16)] or spironolactone [MD: -0.65 L (95%CI: -1.66; 0.36)]. Heterogeneity was high and the report of clinical and safety endpoints varied across studies.
CONCLUSION
Based on limited evidence, the addition of a second diuretic to a loop diuretic may promote diuresis and negative fluid balance in patients with respiratory failure, but only when using a thiazide. Further larger trials to evaluate the safety and efficacy of such interventions in patients with respiratory failure are required.
PubMed: 36331969
DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v11.i3.178 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2019Oedema is a common clinical symptom in people with nephrotic syndrome and human albumin has been widely used in the treatment of oedema by increasing vascular volume and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Oedema is a common clinical symptom in people with nephrotic syndrome and human albumin has been widely used in the treatment of oedema by increasing vascular volume and this inducing diuresis. It may be used with or without diuretics such as furosemide. However, the quantitative contribution of human albumin in treating oedema is not fully understood. If human albumin were found to be effective and safe in the treatment of oedema, it could help clinicians to develop therapeutic strategies to improve the management of diuretic resistance associated with nephrotic syndrome.
OBJECTIVES
This review aimed to examine the benefits and harms of human albumin infusion for treating oedema associated with nephrotic syndrome.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 23 June 2019 through contact with the Information Specialists using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Specialised Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating the effect of human albumin infusion compared with placebo or no intervention, human albumin with diuretics compared with diuretic alone, human albumin compared with diuretics and other treatments, clinical outcomes, death, quality of life, kidney function and adverse effects in people with nephrotic syndrome. We excluded cross-over studies but data for the first period was to be included if available.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration were used. Two authors independently assessed eligibility, risk of bias, study quality and extracted data. We calculated mean difference (MD) for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
One study met our inclusion criteria (26 children with minimal change nephrotic syndrome) and 11 were excluded (nine cross-over studies, one where albumin was not used for nephrotic syndrome and one where authors did not state whether the children had oedema). Risk of bias for the included study was unclear for selection bias, high for performance and detection bias, low for attrition bias, and high for selective reporting. The included study compared albumin plus furosemide with an equal volume of dextrose. Of our prespecified outcomes, the authors reported clinical improvement as weight change, serum sodium and adverse outcomes (blood pressure). The authors reported a greater weight loss in the albumin treated group initially but no difference overall at 10 days. However, the data in the text and the figures were inconsistent so we could not confirm the authors statements (very low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether albumin infusion improves serum sodium when compared with an equal volume of dextrose (MD 2.00 mEq/L, 95% CI -0.09 to 4.09), systolic blood pressure (MD 2.00 mmHg, 95% CI -3.52 to 7.52) or diastolic blood pressure (MD 2.00 mmHg, 95%CI -4.29 to 8.29). Death, quality of life, and kidney function were not reported.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We identified only one small study that was relevant to our review, therefore we are unable to draw any conclusions regarding the use of human albumin with or without diuretics in nephrotic syndrome. More RCTs are needed.
PubMed: 31425606
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009692.pub2 -
Psychiatrische Praxis Jan 2014With particular focus on clinical, pathophysiologic and epidemiologic aspects this systematic review article presents the available data on nephrotoxic effects of a... (Review)
Review
With particular focus on clinical, pathophysiologic and epidemiologic aspects this systematic review article presents the available data on nephrotoxic effects of a long-term treatment with lithium. Lithium may lead to tubular dysfunction (LITD = nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis, increased natriuresis) and lithium-induced nephropathy (LIN) with reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The histopathologic finding of LIN is chronic tubulo-interstitial nephritis. LITD frequently presents with polydipsia/-uria and reduced urine osmolality, while LIN features a wide clinical spectrum ranging from clinically asymptomatic presentations with reduced GFR to end-stage renal failure. LIN seems to feature slow progression and is significantly less frequent than LITD. Regular monitoring of renal function is indispensable for patients treated with lithium. Patients with reduced GFR under treatment with lithium should always be presented to a nephrologist. Currently, there are no guidelines for the handling of patients with LIN and ongoing treatment with lithium. Thus, regarding continuation of lithium-treatment an individual benefit/risk assessment is necessary.
Topics: Bipolar Disorder; Diabetes Insipidus, Nephrogenic; Drug Monitoring; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Concentrating Ability; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Function Tests; Lithium Compounds; Long-Term Care; Natriuresis; Nephritis, Interstitial; Referral and Consultation; Water-Electrolyte Balance
PubMed: 24089323
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1349490 -
Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic... Oct 2012A best evidence topic was constructed according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'Does perioperative furosemide usage reduce the need for renal... (Review)
Review
A best evidence topic was constructed according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was 'Does perioperative furosemide usage reduce the need for renal replacement therapy in cardiac surgery patients?' Forty-seven papers were found using the reported search, of which 10 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Current best available evidence to resolve the issue includes a systematic review and nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The systematic review of seven RCTs and one observational study has demonstrated that in patients who have undergone cardiac surgery, a more consistent and sustained diuresis is produced by a continuous infusion of furosemide compared with intermittent bolus doses of furosemide. However, there does not appear to be a significant difference in the total urine output or a change in serum electrolyte levels when furosemide is administered as a continuous infusion compared with intermittent bolus doses. Three RCTs recruiting neonatal and paediatric patients after open heart surgery also validated the safety and efficacy of furosemide infusion as well as intermittent bolus doses. Two of the five RCTS in adult cardiac surgery patients showed that furosemide infusion was associated with a reduced need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), while two RCTs failed to show any benefit and one reported an increased incidence of renal impairment. We conclude that continuous furosemide infusion in the perioperative period promotes a gentle and sustained diuresis in cardiac surgery patients. The evidence supporting the benefit of this strategy in terms of reducing the need for RRT is weak. At the same time, current best available evidence, albeit from small RCTs, suggests that the timely introduction of continuous furosemide infusion does not increase the incidence of renal impairment after cardiac surgery.
Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Aged; Benchmarking; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Diuretics; Drug Administration Schedule; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Furosemide; Humans; Infusions, Parenteral; Male; Perioperative Care; Renal Replacement Therapy; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 22761122
DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivs208 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jun 2016Fluid excess may place people undergoing surgery at risk for various complications. Hypertonic salt solution (HS) maintains intravascular volume with less intravenous... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Fluid excess may place people undergoing surgery at risk for various complications. Hypertonic salt solution (HS) maintains intravascular volume with less intravenous fluid than isotonic salt (IS) solutions, but may increase serum sodium. This review was published in 2010 and updated in 2016.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the benefits and harms of HS versus IS solutions administered for fluid resuscitation to people undergoing surgery.
SEARCH METHODS
In this updated review we have searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; Issue 4, 2016); MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2016); EMBASE (January 1980 to April 2016); LILACS (January 1982 to April 2016) and CINAHL (January 1982 to April 2016) without language restrictions. We conducted the original search on April 30th, 2007, and reran it on April 8th, 2016.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We have included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing HS to IS in people undergoing surgery, irrespective of blinding, language, and publication status.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two independent review authors read studies that met our selection criteria. We collected study information and data using a data collection sheet with predefined parameters. We have assessed the impact of HS administration on mortality, organ failure, fluid balance, serum sodium, serum osmolarity, diuresis and physiologic measures of cardiovascular function. We have pooled the data using the mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes. We evaluated heterogeneity between studies by I² percentage. We consider studies with an I² of 0% to 30% to have no or little heterogeneity, 30% to 60% as having moderate heterogeneity, and more than 60% as having high heterogeneity. In studies with low heterogeneity we have used a fixed-effect model, and a random-effects model for studies with moderate to high heterogeneity.
MAIN RESULTS
We have included 18 studies with 1087 participants of whom 545 received HS compared to 542 who received IS. All participants were over 18 years of age and all trials excluded high-risk patients (ASA IV). All trials assessed haematological parameters peri-operatively and up to three days post-operatively.There were three (< 1%) deaths reported in the IS group and four (< 1%) in the HS group, as assessed at 90 days in one study. There were no reports of serious adverse events. Most participants were in a positive fluid balance postoperatively (4.4 L IS and 2.5 L HS), with the excess significantly less in HS participants (MD -1.92 L, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.61 to -1.22 L; P < 0.00001). IS participants received a mean volume of 2.4 L and HS participants received 1.49 L, significantly less fluid than IS-treated participants (MD -0.91 L, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.59 L; P < 0.00001). The maximum average serum sodium ranged between 138.5 and 159 in HS groups compared to between 136 and 143 meq/L in the IS groups. The maximum serum sodium was significantly higher in HS participants (MD 7.73, 95% CI 5.84 to 9.62; P < 0.00001), although the level remained within normal limits (136 to 146 meq/L).A high degree of heterogeneity appeared to be related to considerable differences in the dose of HS between studies. The quality of the evidence for the outcomes reported ranged from high to very low. The risk of bias for many of the studies could not be determined for performance and detection bias, criteria that we assess as likely to impact the study outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
HS reduces the volume of intravenous fluid required to maintain people undergoing surgery but transiently increases serum sodium. It is not known if HS affects survival and morbidity, but this should be examined in randomized controlled trials that are designed and powered to test these outcomes.
Topics: Crystalloid Solutions; Fluid Therapy; Humans; Isotonic Solutions; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Saline Solution, Hypertonic; Sodium; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Water-Electrolyte Balance
PubMed: 27271480
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005576.pub3 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... 2000Leg oedema from venous insufficiency is not dangerous but it can cause women symptoms such as pain, feelings of heaviness, night cramps and paraesthesiae. Leg oedema can... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Leg oedema from venous insufficiency is not dangerous but it can cause women symptoms such as pain, feelings of heaviness, night cramps and paraesthesiae. Leg oedema can be a sign of pre-eclampsia when associated with raised blood pressure or proteinuria.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this review was to assess the effects of treatment to relieve the symptoms associated with varicosity in pregnancy and to reduce leg oedema.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised trials of any form of treatment for varicosity or leg oedema in pregnancy.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Trial quality was assessed and data were extracted independently by two reviewers.
MAIN RESULTS
Three trials of three different treatments were included. A total of 115 women were involved. In one trial, two thirds of women given rutoside capsules in the last three months of pregnancy noted an improvement in symptoms compared with only one third given placebo (odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.77). They had a decrease in ankle circumference at 36 weeks' gestation after eight weeks of treatment, while women given placebo had a small increase. In one trial, women with ankle oedema had a small non-significant reduction in lower leg volume when treated with external pneumatic intermittent compression for 30 minutes. Fifty minutes immersion in water at 32 degrees Celsius resulted in greater diuresis and fall in blood pressure than 50 minutes bedrest.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS
Rutosides appear to relieve symptoms of venous insufficiency in late pregnancy. However it is not known if the drug is safe in pregnancy. External pneumatic compression appears to reduce ankle swelling. Immersion in water for 50 minutes results in diuresis and fall in blood pressure. It is not known for how long these changes are sustained nor whether they are of any benefit.
Topics: Edema; Female; Humans; Immersion; Leg; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular; Pressure; Rutin; Varicose Veins; Vasodilator Agents
PubMed: 10796237
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001066 -
Heart Failure Reviews Jan 2019Diuretic therapy is important in critically ill patients because fluid overload impairs organ function and increases mortality. Compared to intermittent administration,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Diuretic therapy is important in critically ill patients because fluid overload impairs organ function and increases mortality. Compared to intermittent administration, continuous infusion of loop diuretics is theoretically superior in terms of diuresis and electrolyte balance. However, the available evidence is susceptible to carryover diuretic effects and resistance in earlier crossover trials. Consequently, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of parallel-group randomized controlled trials to compare these two strategies in adults with acute decompensated heart failure. We searched Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from their inceptions to May 26, 2018. We pooled the data using a random effects model. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, length of hospital stay, and body weight reduction. We analyzed 12 parallel-group randomized controlled trials involving 923 patients. Compared with intermittent administration, continuous infusion of furosemide was not associated with an improvement in all-cause mortality (risk ratio 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 2.16), length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] - 0.88 days; 95% CI, - 2.76 to 1.01), or 24-h urine output (WMD 489.17 mL; 95% CI, - 183.18 to 1161.51), but was significantly associated with a greater body weight reduction (WMD 0.63 kg; 95% CI, 0.23 to 1.02). No differences in hypokalemia, hyponatremia, increased serum creatinine level, and hypotension were noted. Continuous infusion of furosemide, compared to intermittent administration, is associated with a greater body weight reduction and potential increase in 24-h urine output. The limited available evidence suggests no difference in adverse events between both strategies. Trial registration: PROSPERO (CRD42017083878).
Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Furosemide; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss
PubMed: 30054781
DOI: 10.1007/s10741-018-9727-7 -
JAC-antimicrobial Resistance Feb 2024Population pharmacokinetic studies of β-lactam antimicrobials in critically ill patients derive models that inform their dosing. In non-linear mixed-effects modelling,... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Population pharmacokinetic studies of β-lactam antimicrobials in critically ill patients derive models that inform their dosing. In non-linear mixed-effects modelling, covariates are often used to improve model fit and explain variability. We aimed to investigate which covariates are most commonly assessed and which are found to be significant, along with global patterns of publication.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review, searching MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and Web of Science on 01 March 2023, including studies of critically ill adults receiving β-lactam antimicrobials who underwent blood sampling for population pharmacokinetic studies. We extracted and categorized all reported covariates and assessed reporting quality using the ClinPK checklist.
RESULTS
Our search identified 151 studies with 6018 participants. Most studies reported observational cohorts (120 studies, 80%), with the majority conducted in high-income settings (136 studies, 90%). Of the 1083 identified covariate instances, 237 were unique; the most common categories were patient characteristics ( = 404), biomarkers ( = 206) and physiological parameters ( = 163). Only seven distinct commonly reported covariates (CL, weight, glomerular filtration rate, diuresis, need for renal replacement, serum albumin and C-reactive protein) were significant more than 20% of the time.
CONCLUSIONS
Covariates are most commonly chosen based on biological plausibility, with patient characteristics and biomarkers the most frequently investigated. We developed an openly accessible database of reported covariates to aid investigators with covariate selection when designing population pharmacokinetic studies. Novel covariates, such as sepsis subphenotypes, have not been explored yet, leaving a research gap for future work.
PubMed: 38410250
DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae030