-
Parkinsonism & Related Disorders Jun 2011Parkinson's disease (PD) can be a severely disabling condition in spite of therapies currently available. Systematic review and meta-analysis can provide an overview of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Parkinson's disease (PD) can be a severely disabling condition in spite of therapies currently available. Systematic review and meta-analysis can provide an overview of a field of research and identify potential sources of bias and limits to efficacy. In this study we use these tools to describe the reported efficacy of dopamine agonists in animal models of PD.
METHODS
Publications were identified by electronic searching of three online databases. Data were extracted for neurobehavioural outcome, for study design and for the reporting of measures to avoid bias. Standardised mean difference meta-analysis was used to provide summary estimates of efficacy, with the effects of study quality and study design explored using stratified meta-analysis.
RESULTS
253 publications reported the use of a dopamine agonist in an animal model of PD; of these 121 reported data suitable for inclusion in meta-analysis. 47 interventions were tested in 601 experiments using 4181 animals. Overall, neurobehavioural outcome was improved by 1.08 standard deviations (SD; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.97-1.19). Reporting of measures to reduce bias was low and publications which reported the blinded assessment of outcome had significantly smaller effect sizes (0.85, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.07) than those which did not (1.18, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.31, p < 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS
While dopamine agonists do appear to have efficacy in animal models of PD the low prevalence of reporting of measures to avoid bias is of concern. Systematic review of individual interventions may be helpful in the design of future preclinical and clinical trials.
Topics: Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Dopamine Agonists; Humans; Parkinson Disease
PubMed: 21376651
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.02.010 -
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism Jan 2021To assess the metabolic effects of dopamine agonists compared with placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including adults with type 2 diabetes. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The effect of dopamine agonists on metabolic variables in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review with meta analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.
AIM
To assess the metabolic effects of dopamine agonists compared with placebo in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including adults with type 2 diabetes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Eligible trials were identified by searching PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL. The primary outcomes were HbA1c and serious adverse events (SAEs) assessed at longest available follow-up. Secondary outcomes were fasting plasma glucose, adverse events, body weight, hypoglycaemia and triglycerides. We assessed risk of bias and evaluated the certainty of the evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
RESULTS
Nine RCTs enrolling 3456 participants were included, six of which assessed the effect of bromocriptine, and the other three the effect of cabergoline. Dopamine agonists reduced HbA1c with 0.69 standardized mean difference (95% CI = 0.28 to 1.09; P = .0008; I = 80%; GRADE: low) compared with placebo. There was no difference in the effect between bromocriptine and cabergoline. Heterogeneity was partly explained by dosage and study duration, both of which were inversely associated with effect size. Only one large trial reported SAEs and no difference was reported for the risk of an SAE (RR = 0.89; 95% CI = 0.70 to 1.12; P = .32) between active intervention and placebo. Secondary outcomes suggested a decrease in fasting plasma glucose and triglycerides and no effect on the remaining outcomes.
CONCLUSION
Dopamine agonists reduce HbA1c as well as fasting plasma glucose and triglycerides in patients with type 2 diabetes without causing SAEs. These data are based on moderate to low quality evidence thus our confidence in the effect estimates is limited.
Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dopamine Agonists; Fasting; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 32869474
DOI: 10.1111/dom.14183 -
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Mar 2017Intermediate phenotypes may contribute to elucidate the genetic determinants of schizophrenia. A regulatory dopamine 2-receptor gene (DRD2) polymorphism (rs1076560; G>T)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Intermediate phenotypes may contribute to elucidate the genetic determinants of schizophrenia. A regulatory dopamine 2-receptor gene (DRD2) polymorphism (rs1076560; G>T) has been identified as a genetic risk factor for schizophrenia. Studies report conflicting results on its involvement in schizophrenia intermediate phenotypes and no systematic review on this topic has been published. Therefore, we aimed to assess whether this polymorphism is implicated in schizophrenia intermediate phenotypes by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alternative allele carrier status negatively affected all intermediate phenotypes except for brain morphology, for which inconsistent genotype effects were found. Specifically, alternative allele carriers showed inefficient brain recruitment in healthy subjects and decreased brain recruitment in schizophrenia patients. Finally, significant results of the meta-analysis on functional magnetic resonance imaging in healthy subjects pinpointed rs1076560-associated brain regions, in particular the fronto-striatal network. To increase homogeneity and thus improve comparability in future genetic studies investigating SCZ intermediate phenotypes, we highlight methodological caveats and provide suggestions to circumvent such pitfalls.
Topics: Genotype; Humans; Phenotype; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Schizophrenia
PubMed: 28104410
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.01.006 -
JAMA Dermatology Aug 2020The association between the use of medications and the development of bullous pemphigoid (BP) is unclear. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
The association between the use of medications and the development of bullous pemphigoid (BP) is unclear.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the associations between previous exposure to certain medications and BP.
DATA SOURCES
For this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase were searched for relevant studies from inception to February 20, 2020.
STUDY SELECTION
Case-control or cohort studies and randomized clinical trials that examined the odds or risk of BP in patients with previous medication use were included. No geographic or language limitations were imposed.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guideline was followed. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the risk of bias of included observational studies; Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used for randomized clinical trials. Aggregate data were used to conduct a random-effects model meta-analysis if the included studies were sufficiently homogenous. Subgroup analyses were performed for use of various medications of the same category.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Odds ratio (OR), hazard ratio, and risk ratio of bullous pemphigoid in association with medication use.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 13 case-control studies, 1 cohort study, and 1 randomized clinical trial with a total of 285 884 participants. The meta-analysis of case-control studies showed a significant association of BP with previous use of aldosterone antagonists (pooled OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.28-2.40), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (pooled OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.55-2.38), anticholinergics (pooled OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.54-6.33), and dopaminergic medications (pooled OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.34-3.05). One cohort study found an increased risk of BP among patients receiving dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (hazard ratio, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.16-4.88; P = .02). One trial found a higher occurrence of BP in patients with diabetes receiving linagliptin (0.2% in diabetes group vs 0% in the placebo group).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that aldosterone antagonists, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, anticholinergics, and dopaminergic medications are associated with BP. These medications should be judiciously prescribed, particularly in high-risk patients who are elderly and have disabling neurologic disorders.
Topics: Antihypertensive Agents; Cholinergic Antagonists; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Diuretics; Dopamine Agents; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Odds Ratio; Pemphigoid, Bullous; Psychotropic Drugs; Risk Factors
PubMed: 32584924
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.1587 -
Cureus Mar 2023Parkinson's disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder that occurs in old age due to a decrease in dopamine, which causes nerve cell destruction. This... (Review)
Review
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder that occurs in old age due to a decrease in dopamine, which causes nerve cell destruction. This disease is difficult to diagnose since its symptoms are similar to those of the aging process. Those with PD have impaired motor control and function, dyskinesia, and tremors. To treat PD, drugs that enhance the amount of dopamine given to the brain are administered to alleviate symptoms. This inquiry examines the prescription of rotigotine to achieve this objective. The primary objective of this review is to examine the usage of rotigotine in both the late and early stages of PD. The statistical model utilized in the review found that there was not a significant difference in the dosage of rotigotine prescribed to late and early-stage PD patients, however, there were some confounding variables that may have skewed this result; therefore, further research is necessary to validate or nullify this hypothesis.
PubMed: 37069881
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36211 -
Endocrine Jan 2018Dopamine agonists (DAs) are recommended as first-line treatment for patients with hyperprolactinemia. Generally, it is accepted that patients with hyperprolactinemia do... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Dopamine agonists (DAs) are recommended as first-line treatment for patients with hyperprolactinemia. Generally, it is accepted that patients with hyperprolactinemia do not need lifelong medication, but the optimal timing for DA withdrawal has not been determined. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the impact of DA withdrawal on the clinical outcomes of patients with hyperprolactinemia, and to explore possible factors affecting successful DA withdrawal.
METHODS
The databases of PubMed, Cochrane and EMBASE were searched up to May 2016.
RESULTS
The proportion of patients with persisting normoprolactinemia after DA withdrawal reached 36.6% in a random effects model (95% CI, 29.4-44.2%; I-squared: 82.5%). Data of stratified analysis showed that the success rate of drug withdrawal was high in patients using cabergoline (CAB) as the only treatment (41.2%; 95% CI 32.3-50.4%) and those using CAB over 24 months (48.7%; 95% CI 38.9-58.5%), especially in patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia (73.2%; 95% CI 55.6-87.7%). In addition, patients who received a low maintenance dose of CAB, and had a significant reduction in tumor size (over 50%) before withdrawal, were more likely to achieve success (51.5 and 49.4%, respectively).
CONCLUSION
The success rate of DA withdrawal has increased in recent years. Further, the success rate of CAB withdrawal was higher than that of bromocriptine, especially in patients with a duration of treatment longer than 24 months. Conclusively, the probability of success was higher in patients who received low-dose CAB maintenance treatment and those who achieved a significant reduction in tumor size before withdrawal.
Topics: Dopamine Agonists; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hyperprolactinemia; Pituitary Neoplasms; Prolactinoma; Time Factors; Withholding Treatment
PubMed: 29043560
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-017-1444-9 -
Behavioral Sciences (Basel, Switzerland) Oct 2021Although blockade of dopamine receptors D2 and D3 appears to be the main mechanism of antipsychotic action, treatment response variability calls for an examination of... (Review)
Review
Dopamine, Serotonin, and Structure/Function Brain Defects as Biological Bases for Treatment Response in Delusional Disorder: A Systematic Review of Cases and Cohort Studies.
Although blockade of dopamine receptors D2 and D3 appears to be the main mechanism of antipsychotic action, treatment response variability calls for an examination of other biological systems. Our aim is to systematically review reports of treatment response in delusional disorder (DD) in order to help determine its biological bases. Computerized searches of ClinicalTrials.gov, PubMed, and Scopus databases (from 1999 to September 2021) were systematically reviewed, in keeping with PRISMA directives. We used the search terms: (treat * OR therap * AND (delusional disorder)). We included all studies that explored the biological mechanisms of treatment response in DD, as diagnosed by ICD or DSM criteria. A total of 4344 records were initially retrieved, from which 14 papers were included: case reports, case series, and cohort studies. Findings point to (1) dopaminergic dysfunction (based on biochemical and genetic studies), (2) serotonergic dysfunction (based on partial agonism/antagonism of drugs), and (3) brain structure/function impairment, especially in the temporal and parietal lobes, as crucial factors in treatment response. Further studies with higher levels of evidence are needed to help clinicians determine treatment.
PubMed: 34677234
DOI: 10.3390/bs11100141 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Aug 2007Around 1% of adults have Parkinson's disease, with a median time of 9 years between diagnosis and death. (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Around 1% of adults have Parkinson's disease, with a median time of 9 years between diagnosis and death.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of drug treatments in people with early-stage Parkinson's disease? What are the effects of adding other treatments in people with Parkinson's disease who have motor complications from levodopa? What are the effects of surgery in people with later Parkinson's disease? What are the effects of nursing and rehabilitation treatments in people with Parkinson's disease? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and other important databases up to November 2006 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically, please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 59 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: adding a catechol-methyl transferase inhibitor, or dopamine agonist to levodopa; amantadine; dopamine agonists; levodopa (immediate-release, modified-release); monoamine oxidase B inhibitors; occupational therapy; pallidal deep brain stimulation; pallidotomy; Parkinson's disease nurse specialist interventions; physiotherapy; speech and language therapy; subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation; subthalamotomy; swallowing therapy; thalamic deep brain stimulation; and thalamotomy.
Topics: Deep Brain Stimulation; Globus Pallidus; Humans; Levodopa; Parkinson Disease; Subthalamic Nucleus
PubMed: 19454106
DOI: No ID Found -
Pituitary Dec 2022Giant prolactinoma (GP) in childhood and adolescence is a rare entity with scarce literature. We aimed to describe clinical features, biochemistry, radiology, genetics,...
PURPOSE
Giant prolactinoma (GP) in childhood and adolescence is a rare entity with scarce literature. We aimed to describe clinical features, biochemistry, radiology, genetics, management, and outcome in pediatric (≤ 20 years) GP.
METHODS
Retrospective record review of 18 pediatric GP patients from our center and systematic review including these and 77 from the literature (total cohort: 95).
RESULTS
GP constituted 20% of our pediatric prolactinoma cohort. In the total cohort (age: 15.4 ± 3.5 years), the majority (77, 82.8%) were males. Mass effect symptoms (88.6%), and pubertal delay/arrest in males (82.1%) were frequent. Median basal prolactin was 8649 (3246-17,532) ng/ml and the maximum tumor dimension was 5.5 ± 1.5 cm. MEN1 and AIP mutations were noted in 7 (21.9%) and 6 (18.8%) patients, respectively. Males with central hypogonadism had baseline bi-testicular volume of 20.2 ± 8.4 cc, lower LH than FSH (-2.04 ± 0.9 vs. -0.7 ± 1.6 SDS, p = 0.0075), and mostly, normal inhibin B. Majority (49/76, 64.5%) received dopamine agonist (DA) as first-line treatment with additional therapy in 35% (17/49). DA monotherapy arm had less frequent central hypothyroidism (42.9% vs 87.1%, p = 0.002) and central adrenal insufficiency (7.1% vs 66.7%, p = 0.0003) than multimodal therapy. A smaller tumor dimension (4.7 vs. 5.7 cm, p = 0.04) was associated with normoprolactinemia on DA monotherapy and AIP mutations (33.3% vs. nil, p = 0.02) with multimodal therapy.
CONCLUSION
GP is characterized by male predominance with frequent delay/arrest of puberty (82%), but relative sparing of the FSH-inhibin B axis in boys. DA monotherapy may be preferred as the first-line therapy in pediatric GP.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Female; Humans; Male; Dopamine Agonists; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Pituitary Neoplasms; Prolactin; Prolactinoma; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35851929
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-022-01250-y -
Basic & Clinical Pharmacology &... Jan 2019The effect of risperidone treatment in patients with schizophrenia varies according to the dopamine receptor genes. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The effect of risperidone treatment in patients with schizophrenia varies according to the dopamine receptor genes. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between genes of the dopamine receptors (D1, D2, and D3) and the effect of risperidone treatment.
METHODS
Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were searched for relevant cohort or case-control studies published before 9 May 2018. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed for qualitative and quantitative assessment of the relationship between the dopamine receptors D1, D2, and D3 (DRD1, 2, and 3) and the effect of risperidone treatment. The summary odds ratio (OR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) in a random-effects model were used to measure these relationships.
RESULTS
Twelve studies involving 24 SNPs were included. DRD2 (Ser311Cys, rs1801028 Ser/Ser) significantly lowered the improvement rate (determined by the PANSS score) unlike Ser/Cys (WMD: -11.58, 95% CI: -17.35 to -5.18). For Asian patients, A241G (rs1799978) AA carriers showed greater improvement after risperidone therapy (P < 0.05). The polymorphisms of 141C Ins/Del (rs1799732), T939C (rs6275), rs6277, and TaqID (rs1800498) may also influence the treatment effect. TaqIA (rs1800497) and TaqIB (rs17294542) were not associated with the rate of response to risperidone. DRD3 was not associated with an improvement in the PANSS total score; however, Ser9Gly might be related to a change in negative symptoms. No significant effect of DRD1 (rs5326, rs4867798, rs4532, and rs11749676) was found.
CONCLUSIONS
Our result supported the hypothesis that DRD2 affected risperidone treatment. DRD1 had no significant effect on the response to risperidone, whereas DRD3 might be associated with an improvement in negative symptoms. Larger observational studies are warranted to verify these findings and identify other genetic factors involved.
Topics: Antipsychotic Agents; Humans; Pharmacogenomic Variants; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Receptors, Dopamine D1; Receptors, Dopamine D2; Receptors, Dopamine D3; Risperidone; Schizophrenia; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 30103286
DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13111