-
Lymphology 2022Thoracic duct drainage (TDD) is gaining renewed interest, largely due to accumulation of evidence supporting the gut-lymph model, where toxic mesenteric lymph from the...
Thoracic duct drainage (TDD) is gaining renewed interest, largely due to accumulation of evidence supporting the gut-lymph model, where toxic mesenteric lymph from the intestine contributes to development of multi-organ failure in acute and critical illness (ACI). Advances in minimally invasive TDD have added to this growing interest. The English TDD literature has been previously reviewed, but the more extensive Eastern European literature has not been available to English readers. Therefore, we undertook a systematic search of Eastern European human TDD studies using Scopus and PubMed databases and Russian language websites. Indications for TDD, clinical outcomes, and complications were reviewed. 113 studies, published between 1965 and 2015, were reviewed. The most common indications for TDD were hepatic failure, acute pancreatitis, and peritonitis. It was often used late and when other treatment options had been exhausted. Human TDD appeared safe and probably effective, especially when combined with lymphosorption. The benefit appeared to correlate with the volume of lymph drained. A randomized controlled trial (and some case-control studies) showed reduced mortality in patients with ACI with TDD. Other benefits included rapid normalization of blood parameters and decreased organ edema. This review provides further support for the gut-lymph model and justification for high quality randomized controlled trials of TDD in ACI. It also highlights other potential indications for TDD, such as bridging patients with liver failure to surgery or transplant.
Topics: Humans; Thoracic Duct; Acute Disease; Pancreatitis; Drainage; Lymphatic Vessels; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 36446397
DOI: No ID Found -
Breast Care (Basel, Switzerland) Feb 2022Periductal mastitis (PDM) is a complex benign breast disease with a prolonged course and a high risk of recurrence after treatment. There are many available treatments...
INTRODUCTION
Periductal mastitis (PDM) is a complex benign breast disease with a prolonged course and a high risk of recurrence after treatment. There are many available treatments for PDM, but none is widely accepted. This study aims to evaluate the various treatment failure rates (TFR) of different invasive treatment measures by looking at recurrence and persistence after treatment. In this way, it sets out to inform better clinical decisions in the treatment of PDM.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for eligible studies about different treatment regimens provided to PDM patients that had been published before October 1, 2019. We included original studies written in English that reported the recurrence and/or persistence rates of each therapy. Outcomes were presented as pooled TFR and 95% CI for the TFR.
RESULTS
We included 27 eligible studies involving 1,066 patients in this study. We summarized 4 groups and 10 subgroups of PDM treatments, according to the published studies. Patients treated minimally invasively (group 1) were subdivided into 3 subgroups and pooled TFR were calculated as follows: incision and drainage ( = 73; TFR = 75.6%; 95% CI 27.3-100%), incision alone ( = 74; TFR = 20.1%; 95% CI 0-59.9%), and breast duct irrigation ( = 123; TFR = 19.4%; 95% CI 0-65.0%). Patients treated with a minor excision (excision of the infected tissue and related duct; group 2) were divided into 4 subgroups and pooled TFR were calculated as follows: wound packing alone ( = 127; TFR = 2.1%; 95% CI 0-5.2%), primary closure alone ( = 66; TFR = 37.1%; 95% CI 9.5-64.8%), primary closure under antibiotic treatment cover ( = 55; TFR = 4.8%; 95% CI 0-11.4%), and additional nipple part removal ( = 232; TFR = 9.6%; 95% CI 5.8-13.4%). Patients treated with a major excision (excision of the infected tissue and the major duct; group 3) included the following 2 subgroups: patients treated with a circumareolar incision ( = 142; TFR = 7.5%; 95% CI 0.4-14.7%) and patients treated with a radial incision of the breast ( = 78; TFR = 0.6%; 95% CI 0-3.6%). Group 4 contained patients receiving different major plastic surgeries. The pooled TFR of this group ( = 86) was 3.4% (95% CI 0-7.5%).
CONCLUSION
Breast duct irrigation, which is the most minimally invasive of all of the treatment options, seemed to yield good outcomes and may be the first-line treatment for PDM patients. Minor excision methods, except for primary closure alone, might be enough for most PDM patients. Major excision, especially with radial incision, was a highly effective salvage therapy. The major plastic surgery technique was also acceptable as an alternative treatment for patients with large lesions and concerns about breast appearance. Incision and drainage and minor excision with primary closure alone should be avoided for PDM patients. Further research is still needed to better understand the etiology and pathogenesis of PDM and explore more effective treatments for this disease.
PubMed: 35355704
DOI: 10.1159/000514419 -
International Journal of Oral and... Jan 2015The aim of the present review was to analyze the main clinical signs and symptoms observed in patients with thyroglossal duct cysts (TGDCs). Secondarily we investigated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The aim of the present review was to analyze the main clinical signs and symptoms observed in patients with thyroglossal duct cysts (TGDCs). Secondarily we investigated the outcomes following the different types of treatment of TGDCs in children and adults. Three selected strings were run on the PubMed database to retrieve articles on these topics. A double cross-check was performed on citations and full-text articles were identified using the study inclusion and exclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was performed of the data obtained. Overall, 356 articles were identified; 24 (comprising a total of 1371 subjects) satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. On the basis of the meta-analysis, the presence of a neck cystic mass was the main clinical presentation of TGDCs, with a mean rate of 75% (95% confidence interval 72-79%). The mean local wound infection rate was 4% (95% confidence interval 3-6%), this being the most frequent complication following treatment. The mean rate of overall recurrence was 11% (95% confidence interval 9-14%). The Sistrunk procedure appears to be the better choice for the therapy of TGDCs to avoid recurrences. Further studies on larger cohorts of patients regarding the minimally invasive treatment options would be helpful to elucidate and endorse their utilization in selected cases.
Topics: Humans; Recurrence; Thyroglossal Cyst; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 25132570
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.07.007 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Apr 2014To explore the role of radiotherapy in the extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, and to understand if and when radiotherapy could be effective for this group of patients. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
To explore the role of radiotherapy in the extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma, and to understand if and when radiotherapy could be effective for this group of patients.
METHODS
A systematic review of recently published literature was completed. Recent studies using radiotherapy with survival data, resection rates and quality of life data have been analyzed.
RESULTS
There are no randomized trials regarding the treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The bulk of available studies suggest that in some cases radio-chemotherapy can be used as adjuvant therapy. Radiotherapy could also have a role in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma: external radiotherapy or intraluminal brachytherapy--alone or in combination--could improve the outcome in selected patients. Finally, radiotherapy, and in particular intraluminal brachytherapy, could be used as a palliative treatment to improve the quality of life and in controlling symptoms.
CONCLUSION
The role of radiotherapy in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains undefined due to the lack of randomized trials or otherwise properly controlled studies.
Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Extrahepatic; Brachytherapy; Chemoradiotherapy; Cholangiocarcinoma; Humans; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 24289902
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.10.007 -
JAMA Surgery Jun 2014Data on outcomes following surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are limited. The incidence of ICC is increasing and it has a poor prognosis. No... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
IMPORTANCE
Data on outcomes following surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are limited. The incidence of ICC is increasing and it has a poor prognosis. No consensus has been reached regarding the optimal treatment modalities.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review and synthesize the available evidence regarding treatment and prognosis in patients with ICC.
DATA SOURCES
The PubMed database was searched for relevant articles published between January 1, 2000, and April 1, 2013.
STUDY SELECTION
Only studies assessing predictors of survival or recurrence in patients undergoing curative-intent surgical treatment of ICC were included. Small series, studies reporting on mixed types of cholangiocarcinoma, or exclusively on hepatolithiasis-associated cholangiocarcinoma, and those published in a language other than English, French, German, Italian, or Greek, were excluded. Fifty-seven of 960 articles were therefore analyzed.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were extracted by 3 independent reviewers. Multiple studies reporting on the same population were excluded. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
We hypothesized that preoperative variables and tumor characteristics affect patient survival. The outcomes of the study were overall survival and recurrence-free survival. The hypothesis was formulated before data collection.
RESULTS
Fifty-seven studies (4756 patients) were included in the review. Median patient age ranged from 49 to 67 years, and 57% were male. Most patients had a solitary (69%), large (median size, 4.5-8.0 cm) tumor of the mass-forming type (86%). Approximately one-third of the patients had lymph node metastasis (34%) or vascular (38%), perineural (29%), or biliary invasion (29%). Most underwent a major hepatectomy (82%), often accompanied by lymphadenectomy (67%) and sometimes by extrahepatic bile duct resection (23%). Median and 5-year overall survival (OS) generally were approximately 28 months (range, 9-53 months) and 30% (range, 5%-56%), respectively; factors predicting shorter OS included large tumor size, multiple tumors, lymph node metastasis, and vascular invasion. Adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy did not appear to be beneficial. Seven studies (2132 patients) provided data for the meta-analysis. Factors associated with shorter OS included older age (pooled hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17), larger tumor size (1.09; 1.02-1.16), presence of multiple tumors (1.70; 1.43-2.02), lymph node metastasis (2.09; 1.80-2.43), vascular invasion (1.87; 1.44-2.42), and poor tumor differentiation (1.41; 1.17-1.71).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
The prognosis of ICC is dictated mainly by tumor factors. Future research could focus on the usefulness of adjuvant treatment as well as other multidisciplinary treatment modalities.
Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Prognosis
PubMed: 24718873
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5137 -
Journal of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic... Dec 2014The optimal management of patients with symptomatic gallstones and possible or proven common bile duct (CBD) stones and gallstones is still evolving. Today a number of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The optimal management of patients with symptomatic gallstones and possible or proven common bile duct (CBD) stones and gallstones is still evolving. Today a number of options exist: preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (pre-op ERCP), laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) combined with intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (IOES), laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and postoperative ERCP (post-op ERCP). This meta-analysis was done to compare these management options and determine if any single option was clearly superior.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted using several electronic databases. The search revealed 15 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Six comparing pre-op ERCP with LCBDE, five comparing pre-op ERCP with IOES, two comparing IOES with LCBDE and two comparing post-op ERCP with LCBDE, comprising a total of 1992 patients.
RESULTS
The pre-op ERCP group had a significantly higher incidence of ERCP related complications (odds ratio: 2.40, 95% confidence interval: 1.21-4.75).
CONCLUSIONS
The evidence provided by this meta-analysis suggests that both of these approaches would appear comparable. To fully address which would be the better approach would require an RCT as discussed above.
Topics: Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Cholecystolithiasis; Choledocholithiasis; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Humans; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 25187317
DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.152 -
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy &... May 2021The aim was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (group A) versus... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The aim was to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (group A) versus primary LCBDE (group B) for the management of gallbladder and common bile duct stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A comprehensive and systematic literature search was performed in several databases, including PubMed, Ovid, and Cochrane Library. Meta-analysis of operative outcomes, postoperative outcomes, and gallstone clearance rates was conducted using random-effect models.
RESULTS
Six studies including 642 patients (239 in group A and 403 in group B) were included. The operative time was longer in group A (P=0.02). The overall complication, bile leakage, conversion, postoperative hospital stay, and reoperation were comparable in group A and group B. Similarly, no significant difference was present concerning the incidence of stone clearance, residual stone, and recurrent stone (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION
LCBDE is an alternative acceptable procedure when removal of common bile duct stones by endoscopic therapy fails.
Topics: Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Choledocholithiasis; Common Bile Duct; Gallstones; Humans; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 33973942
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000949 -
World Journal of Gastroenterology Sep 2020Pancreatic duct stones can lead to significant abdominal pain for patients. Per oral pancreatoscopy (POP)-guided intracorporal lithotripsy is being increasingly used for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Pancreatic duct stones can lead to significant abdominal pain for patients. Per oral pancreatoscopy (POP)-guided intracorporal lithotripsy is being increasingly used for the management of main pancreatic duct calculi (PDC) in chronic pancreatitis. POP uses two techniques: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) and laser lithotripsy (LL). Data on the safety and efficacy are limited for this procedure. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with a primary aim to calculate the pooled technical and clinical success rates of POP. The secondary aim was to assess pooled rates of technical success, clinical success for the two individual techniques, and adverse event rates.
AIM
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of POP, EHL and LL for management of PDC in chronic pancreatitis.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google Scholar and Web of Science databases (from 1999 to October 2019) to identify studies with patient age greater than 17 and any gender that reported on outcomes of POP, EHL and LL. The primary outcome assessed involved the pooled technical success and clinical success rate of POP. The secondary outcome included the pooled technical success and clinical success rate for EHL and LL. We also assessed the pooled rate of adverse events for POP, EHL and LL including a subgroup analysis for the rate of adverse event subtypes for POP: Hemorrhage, post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP), perforation, abdominal pain, fever and infections. Technical success was defined as the rate of clearing pancreatic duct stones and clinical success as the improvement in pain. Random-effects model was used for analysis. Heterogeneity between study-specific estimates was calculated using the Cochran statistical test and statistics. Publication bias was ascertained, qualitatively by visual inspection of funnel plot and quantitatively by the Egger test.
RESULTS
A total of 16 studies including 383 patients met the inclusion criteria. The technical success rate of POP was 76.4% (95%CI: 65.9-84.5; = 64%) and clinical success rate was 76.8% (95%CI: 65.2-85.4; = 66%). The technical success rate of EHL was 70.3% (95%CI: 57.8-80.3; = 36%) and clinical success rate of EHL was 66.5% (95%CI: 55.2-76.2; = 19%). The technical success rate of LL was 89.3% (95%CI: 70.5-96.7; = 70%) and clinical success rate of LL was 88.2% (95%CI: 66.4-96.6; = 77%). The incidence of pooled adverse events for POP was 14.9% (95%CI: 9.2-23.2; = 49%), for EHL was 11.2% (95%CI: 5.9-20.3; = 15%) and for LL was 13.1% (95%CI: 6.3-25.4; = 31%). Subgroup analysis of adverse events showed rates of PEP at 7% (95%CI: 3.5-13.6; = 38%), fever at 3.7% (95%CI: 2-6.9; = 0), abdominal pain at 4.7% (95%CI: 2.7-7.8; = 0), perforation at 4.3% (95%CI: 2.1-8.4; = 0), hemorrhage at 3.4% (95%CI: 1.7-6.6; = 0) and no mortality. There was evidence of publication bias based on funnel plot analysis and Egger's test.
CONCLUSION
Our study highlights the high technical and clinical success rates for POP, EHL and LL. POP-guided lithotripsy could be a viable option for management of chronic pancreatitis with PDC.
Topics: Calculi; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Humans; Lithotripsy; Pancreatic Diseases; Pancreatic Ducts; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32982119
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i34.5207 -
Auris, Nasus, Larynx Feb 2023To discuss our institutional experience with endoscopic management of intralingual thyroglossal duct cyst (TGDC) and review cases in the published literature in a...
OBJECTIVE
To discuss our institutional experience with endoscopic management of intralingual thyroglossal duct cyst (TGDC) and review cases in the published literature in a systematic review.
METHODS
Pediatric patients with intralingual TGDC treated with endoscopic surgery at our institution from 2009-2019 were identified. Metrics from our case series were then compared to those in the literature in a systematic review to assess pooled outcomes of endoscopic or transoral management. Patient demographics, age of presentation, presenting symptomatology, size of cyst on imaging, type of surgery, and post-operative outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS
We identified 5 institutional cases of intralingual TGDC and 48 cases of intralingual TGDC described in the literature. The average age of presentation was 20.36 months. 69.8% (N=37) of patients presented with at least one respiratory symptom, 22.6% (N=12) presented with dysphagia, 9.4% (N=5) presented with an identified mass in the oropharynx, and 15.1% (N=8) had the cyst discovered as an incidental finding. Three patients required revision surgeries due to prior incomplete TGDC excisions and one patient experienced a recurrence >6 months after primary excision requiring a second procedure. Our data pooled with published case series in systematic review confirms that endoscopic or transoral management are excellent options for definitive management of intralingual TGDC.
CONCLUSIONS
Intralingual TDGC is a potentially life-threatening variant of TGDC. Our results pooled with published series in a systematic review suggest that endoscopic or transoral management of intralingual TGDC are excellent minimally invasive treatments with a low risk of recurrence. Postoperative surveillance up to one year is recommended.
Topics: Child; Humans; Infant; Thyroglossal Cyst; Endoscopy; Reoperation; Deglutition Disorders
PubMed: 35659788
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2022.05.014 -
Endoscopy International Open Oct 2020Per-oral pancreatoscopy (POP) with intraductal lithotripsy via electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) or laser lithotripsy (LL) facilitates optically-guided stone... (Review)
Review
Per-oral pancreatoscopy (POP) with intraductal lithotripsy via electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) or laser lithotripsy (LL) facilitates optically-guided stone fragmentation of difficult pancreatic stones refractory to conventional endoscopic therapy. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of POP with intraductal lithotripsy for difficult pancreatic duct stones. Individualized search strategies were developed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. This was a cumulative meta-analysis performed by calculating pooled proportions with rates estimated using random effects models. Measured outcomes included pooled technical success, complete or partial stone fragmentation success, complete duct clearance after initial lithotripsy session, and adverse events (AEs). Ten studies (n = 302 patients; 67.72 % male; mean age 55.10 ± 3.22 years) were included with mean stone size of 10.66 ± 2.19 mm. The most common stone location was in the pancreatic head (66.17 %). Pooled technical success was 91.18 % with an overall fragmentation success of 85.77 %. Single lithotripsy session stone fragmentation and pancreatic duct clearance occurred in 62.05 % of cases. Overall, adverse events were reported in 14.09 % of patients with post-procedure pancreatitis developing in 8.73 %. Of these adverse events, 4.84 % were classified as serious. Comparing POP-EHL vs POP-LL, there was no significant difference in technical success, fragmentation success, single session duct clearance, or AEs ( > 0.0500). Based on this systematic review and meta-analysis, POP with intraductal lithotripsy appears to be an effective and relatively safe procedure for patients with difficult to remove pancreatic duct stones.
PubMed: 33043115
DOI: 10.1055/a-1236-3187