-
BMJ Open Gastroenterology 2020In 2013, peptic ulcer disease (PUD) caused over 300 000 deaths globally. Low-income and middle-income countries are disproportionately affected. However, there is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
In 2013, peptic ulcer disease (PUD) caused over 300 000 deaths globally. Low-income and middle-income countries are disproportionately affected. However, there is limited information regarding risk factors of perioperative mortality rates in these countries.
OBJECTIVE
To assess perioperative mortality rates from complicated PUD in Africa and associated risk factors.
DESIGN
We performed a systematic review and a random-effect meta-analysis of literature describing surgical management of complicated PUD in Africa. We used subgroup analysis and meta-regression analyses to investigate sources of variations in the mortality rates and to assess the risk factors contributing to mortality.
RESULTS
From 95 published reports, 10 037 patients underwent surgery for complicated PUD. The majority of the ulcers (78%) were duodenal, followed by gastric (14%). Forty-one per cent of operations were for perforation, 22% for obstruction and 9% for bleeding. The operations consisted of vagotomy (38%), primary repair (34%), resection and reconstruction (12%), and drainage procedures (6%). The overall PUD mortality rate was 6.6% (95% CI 5.4% to 8.1%). It increased to 9.7% (95% CI 7.1 to 13.0) when we limited the analysis to studies published after the year 2000. The correlation was higher between perforated PUD and mortality rates (r=0.41, p<0.0001) than for bleeding PUD and mortality rates (r=0.32, p=0.001). Non-significant differences in mortality rates existed between sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and North Africa and within SSA.
CONCLUSION
Perioperative mortality rates from complicated PUD in Africa are substantially high and could be increasing over time, and there are possible regional differences.
Topics: Africa South of the Sahara; Humans; Peptic Ulcer; Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage; Peptic Ulcer Perforation; Risk Factors
PubMed: 32128227
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2019-000350 -
Journal of Gastroenterology and... Jan 2019While the prevalence of celiac disease (CD) is increasing globally, the prevalence of tropical sprue (TS) is declining. Still, there are certain regions in the world... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND AND AIM
While the prevalence of celiac disease (CD) is increasing globally, the prevalence of tropical sprue (TS) is declining. Still, there are certain regions in the world where both patients with CD and TS exist and differentiation between them is a challenging task. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to find out differentiating clinical, endoscopic, and histological characteristics between CD and TS.
METHODS
Medline, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were searched for keywords: celiac disease, coeliac, celiac, tropical sprue, sprue, clinical presentation, endoscopy, and histology. Studies published between August 1960 and January 2018 were reviewed. Out of 1063 articles available, 12 articles were included in the final analysis.
RESULTS
Between the patients with CD and TS, there was no difference in the prevalence and duration of chronic diarrhea, abdominal distension, weight loss, extent of abnormal fecal fat content, and density of intestinal inflammation. The following features were more common in CD: short stature, vomiting/dyspepsia, endoscopic scalloping/attenuation of duodenal folds, histological high modified Marsh changes, crescendo type of IELosis, surface epithelial denudation, surface mucosal flattening, thickening of subepithelial basement membrane and celiac seropositivity; while those in TS include anemia, abnormal urinary D-xylose test, endoscopic either normal duodenal folds or mild attenuation, histologically decrescendo type of IELosis, low modified Marsh changes, patchy mucosal changes, and mucosal eosinophilia.
CONCLUSIONS
Both patients with CD and TS have overlapping clinical, endoscopic, and histological characteristics, and there is no single diagnostic feature for differentiating CD from TS except for celiac specific serological tests.
Topics: Anemia; Autoantibodies; Body Height; Celiac Disease; Diagnosis, Differential; Dyspepsia; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Sprue, Tropical; Vomiting; Xylose
PubMed: 30069926
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14403 -
Surgical Endoscopy Sep 2013Since delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy was introduced, many surgeons have utilized laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with totally intracorporeal Billroth I (ICBI) for... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Comparing the short-term outcomes of totally intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy with extracorporeal gastroduodenostomy after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single surgeon's experience and a rapid systematic review with meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Since delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy was introduced, many surgeons have utilized laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with totally intracorporeal Billroth I (ICBI) for gastric cancer, because it is expected to have several advantages over laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy with extracorporeal Billroth I (ECBI). In this study, we compared these two reconstruction options to evaluate their outcomes.
METHODS
The data of 166 gastric cancer patients who underwent LDG performed by a single surgeon between April 2009 and February 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The subjects were divided into ECBI (n = 106) and ICBI (n = 60) groups, and then the clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, symptoms, and change in BMI at 3 months after surgery were compared. Furthermore, a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted.
RESULTS
The operative time was significantly shorter in the ICBI group (197.4 ± 45.5 vs. 157.1 ± 43.9 min), but blood loss was similar between the groups. Regarding surgical outcomes, there were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay, soft diet initiation, visual analogue scale, frequency of analgesics injection, and postoperative white blood cell counts and C-reactive protein levels between the groups. The surgical complication rates were 5.7 and 13.3% in the ECBI and ICBI groups, respectively, and one case of anastomosis leakage was observed in each group. At 3 months after surgery, reflux symptoms were more frequent in the ICBI group, but other gastrointestinal symptoms and the change of BMI were similar between the groups. The meta-analysis revealed no significant differences in the operative time, time to first flatus, length of hospital stay, frequency of analgesic usages, and rates of anastomosis complications between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS
We could not demonstrate the clinical superiority of ICBI over ECBI based on our data and a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis. The anastomosis method may be selected according to patient conditions and the surgeon's preference.
Topics: Blood Loss, Surgical; C-Reactive Protein; Diet; Duodenum; Female; Gastroenterostomy; Humans; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Pain Management; Retrospective Studies; Stomach Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 23494509
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2869-8 -
Frontiers in Oncology 2021To investigate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of gastric cancer (GC) after robotic laparoscopic gastrectomy (RG LG), we carried out a meta-analysis of...
Comparison of Long-Term and Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Conventional Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of PSM and RCT Studies.
BACKGROUND
To investigate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of gastric cancer (GC) after robotic laparoscopic gastrectomy (RG LG), we carried out a meta-analysis of propensity score matching (PSM) studies and randomized controlled study (RCT) to compare the safety and overall effect of RG to LG for patients with GC.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register were searched based on a defined search strategy to identify eligible PSM and RCT studies before July 2021. Data on perioperative and oncological outcomes were subjected to meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Overall, we identified 19 PSM studies and 1 RCT of RG LG, enrolling a total of 13,446 patients (6,173 and 7,273 patients underwent RG and LG, respectively). The present meta-analysis revealed nonsignificant differences in tumor size, proximal resection margin distance, distal resection margin distance, abdominal bleeding, ileus, anastomosis site leakage, duodenal stump leakage rate, conversion rate, reoperation, overall survival rate, and long-term recurrence-free survival rate between the two groups. Alternatively, comparing RG with LG, RG has a longer operative time ( < 0.00001), less blood loss (p <0.0001), earlier time to first flatus ( = 0.0003), earlier time to oral intake ( = 0.0001), shorter length of stay ( = 0.0001), less major complications ( = 0.0001), lower overall complications ( = 0.0003), more retrieved lymph nodes ( < 0.0001), and more cost ( < 0.00001).
CONCLUSIONS
In terms of oncological adequacy and safety, RG is a feasible and effective treatment strategy for gastric cancer but takes more cost in comparison with LG.
PubMed: 35004278
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.759509 -
Obesity Surgery Jan 2015This study aims to assess the long-term effects of bariatric surgery on type 2 diabetic patients. We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMbase up to Dec 2013.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study aims to assess the long-term effects of bariatric surgery on type 2 diabetic patients. We searched Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMbase up to Dec 2013. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies of bariatric surgery for diabetes patients that reported data with more than 2 years of follow-up were included. We used rigorous methods to screen studies for eligibility and collected data using standardized forms. Where applicable, we pooled data by meta-analyses. Twenty-six studies, including 2 RCTs and 24 cohort studies that enrolled 7883 patients, proved eligible. Despite the differences in the design, those studies consistently showed that bariatric surgery offered better treatment outcomes than non-surgical options. Pooling of cohort studies showed that BMI decreased by 13.4 kg/m(2) (95 % confidence interval (CI), -17.7 to -9.1), fasting blood glucose by 59.7 mg/dl (95 % CI, -74.6 to -44.9), and glycated hemoglobin by 1.8 % (95 % CI, -2.4 to -1.3). Diabetes was improved or in remission in 89.2 % of patients, and 64.7 % of patients was in remission. Weight loss and diabetes remission were greatest in patients undergoing biliopancreatic diversion/duodenal switch, followed by gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and adjustable gastric banding. Bariatric surgery may achieve sustained weight loss, glucose control, and diabetes remission. Large randomized trials with long-term follow-up are warranted to demonstrate the effect on outcomes important to patients (e.g., cardiovascular events).
Topics: Bariatric Surgery; Biliopancreatic Diversion; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Follow-Up Studies; Gastrectomy; Gastric Bypass; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time Factors; Weight Loss
PubMed: 25355456
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1460-2 -
Annals of Surgery Jun 2008The optimal choice of technique for the surgical treatment of pancreatic head lesions in chronic pancreatitis is still under debate. This systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The optimal choice of technique for the surgical treatment of pancreatic head lesions in chronic pancreatitis is still under debate. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection (DPPHR) versus pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) by means of parameters of mortality and morbidity and functional outcomes and quality of life.
METHODS
A systematic literature search (Medline, Embase, Biosis, The Cochrane Library, and Science Citation Index) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DPPHR and PD. Included literature was assessed and extracted by 2 independent reviewers. A meta-analysis of pain relief (primary end point), several parameters of short- and long-term measures and quality of life, was done using the random effects-model.
RESULTS
In total, 1284 citations were checked for eligibility and 4 RCTs were included. The critical appraisal revealed a heterogeneous methodological quality of included trials. Comparing DPPHR versus PD, postoperative pain relief, overall mortality, and morbidity showed no significant difference. Intraoperative blood replacement, hospital stay, weight gain, exocrine insufficiency, occupational rehabilitation, and quality of life were significantly improved in the DPPHR group.
CONCLUSION
DPPHR and PD seem to be equally effective in terms of postoperative pain relief, overall morbidity, and incidence of postoperative endocrine insufficiency. However, the presented findings suggest superiority of DPPHR in the treatment of chronic pancreatitis with regard to several peri and postoperative outcome parameters and quality of life. Further RCTs are eagerly awaited to prove these findings.
Topics: Chronic Disease; Humans; Pain Measurement; Pancreatectomy; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatitis; Postoperative Complications; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 18520222
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181724ee7 -
Surgical Endoscopy Jun 2020Although several non-randomized studies comparing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) recently demonstrated that the two... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with benign and malignant periampullary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.
BACKGROUND
Although several non-randomized studies comparing robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) recently demonstrated that the two operative techniques could be equivalent in terms of safety outcomes and short-term oncologic efficacy, no definitive answer has arrived yet to the question as to whether robotic assistance can contribute to reducing the high rate of postoperative morbidity.
METHODS
Systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE databases. Prospective and retrospective studies comparing RPD and OPD as surgical treatment for periampullary benign and malignant lesions were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis with no limits of language or year of publication.
RESULTS
18 non-randomized studies were included for quantitative synthesis with 13,639 patients allocated to RPD (n = 1593) or OPD (n = 12,046). RPD and OPD showed equivalent results in terms of mortality (3.3% vs 2.8%; P = 0.84), morbidity (64.4% vs 68.1%; P = 0.12), pancreatic fistula (17.9% vs 15.9%; P = 0.81), delayed gastric emptying (16.8% vs 16.1%; P = 0.98), hemorrhage (11% vs 14.6%; P = 0.43), and bile leak (5.1% vs 3.5%; P = 0.35). Estimated intra-operative blood loss was significantly lower in the RPD group (352.1 ± 174.1 vs 588.4 ± 219.4; P = 0.0003), whereas operative time was significantly longer for RPD compared to OPD (461.1 ± 84 vs 384.2 ± 73.8; P = 0.0004). RPD and OPD showed equivalent results in terms of retrieved lymph nodes (19.1 ± 9.9 vs 17.3 ± 9.9; P = 0.22) and positive margin status (13.3% vs 16.1%; P = 0.32).
CONCLUSIONS
RPD is safe and feasible as surgical treatment for malignant or benign disease of the pancreatic head and the periampullary region. Equivalency in terms of surgical radicality including R0 curative resection and number of harvested lymph nodes between the two groups confirmed the reliability of RPD from an oncologic point of view.
Topics: Ampulla of Vater; Common Bile Duct Neoplasms; Humans; Operative Time; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Robotic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 32072286
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07460-4 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery :... Apr 2016Peptic ulcer disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a significant burden in low- and middle-income countries. However, there is... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Peptic ulcer disease is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a significant burden in low- and middle-income countries. However, there is limited information regarding management of peptic ulcer disease in these countries. This study describes surgical interventions for peptic ulcer disease in sub-Saharan Africa.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, and African Index Medicus for studies describing surgical management of peptic ulcer disease in sub-Saharan Africa.
RESULTS
From 55 published reports, 6594 patients underwent surgery for peptic ulcer disease. Most ulcers (86%) were duodenal with the remainder gastric (14%). Thirty-five percent of operations were performed for perforation, 7% for bleeding, 30% for obstruction, and 28% for chronic disease. Common operations included vagotomy (60%) and primary repair (31%). The overall case fatality rate for peptic ulcer disease was 5.7% and varied with indication for operation: 13.6% for perforation, 11.5% for bleeding, 0.5% for obstruction, and 0.3% for chronic disease.
CONCLUSION
Peptic ulcer disease remains a significant indication for surgery in sub-Saharan Africa. Recognizing the continued role of surgery for peptic ulcer disease in sub-Saharan Africa is important for strengthening surgical training programs and optimizing allocation of resources.
Topics: Africa South of the Sahara; Chronic Disease; Developing Countries; Duodenal Ulcer; Humans; Intestinal Obstruction; Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage; Peptic Ulcer Perforation; Stomach Ulcer; Vagotomy
PubMed: 26573850
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-015-3025-7 -
The American Journal of Gastroenterology Mar 2019Subtle histopathologic features such as eosinophilia and increased mast cells have been observed in functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), including functional...
BACKGROUND
Subtle histopathologic features such as eosinophilia and increased mast cells have been observed in functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), including functional dyspepsia (FD) and the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The mechanisms that drive recruitment of these cells to the gastrointestinal tract remain unexplained, largely due to the heterogeneity in phenotypes among patients diagnosed with such conditions. We aimed to systematically review the literature and collate the evidence for immune activation in FD and IBS, and where possible, detail the nature of activation.
METHODS
Seven literature databases were searched using the keywords: 'functional gastrointestinal disorder', FGID, 'functional dyspepsia', 'non-ulcer dyspepsia', 'idiopathic dyspepsia', 'irritable bowel syndrome', IBS and 'immun*'.
RESULTS
Fifty-one papers reporting discordant immune features met the selection criteria for this review. Changes in lymphocyte populations, including B and T lymphocyte numbers and activation status were reported in IBS and FD, in conjunction with duodenal eosinophilia in FD and increased colonic mast cells in IBS. Increases in circulating α4+β7+ gut-homing T cells appear to be linked to the pathophysiology of both FD and IBS. Studies in the area are complicated by poor phenotyping of patients into subgroups and the subtle nature of the immune activity involved in FD and IBS.
CONCLUSIONS
Alterations in proportions of gut-homing T lymphocytes in both FD and IBS indicate that a loss of mucosal homeostasis may drive the symptoms of FD and IBS. There is indirect evidence that Th17 responses may play a role in FGIDs, however the evidence for a Th2 immune phenotype in FD and IBS is limited. Although immune involvement is evident, large, well-characterised patient cohorts are required to elucidate the immune mechanisms driving the development of FGIDs.
Topics: B-Lymphocytes; Colon; Duodenum; Dyspepsia; Eosinophilia; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Lymphocyte Activation; Lymphocyte Count; Mast Cells; T-Lymphocytes; Th17 Cells; Th2 Cells
PubMed: 30839392
DOI: 10.1038/s41395-018-0377-0 -
Obesity Reviews : An Official Journal... Aug 2020Fibroblast growth factor-19 (FGF-19) is a gut hormone which interacts with metabolism and is depleted in obesity. There is some indication that the hormone undergoes a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Fibroblast growth factor-19 (FGF-19) is a gut hormone which interacts with metabolism and is depleted in obesity. There is some indication that the hormone undergoes a resurgence following bariatric surgery (BS), an effect which may contribute to the beneficial outcomes of such procedures. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to synthesize the available literature on FGF-19 levels before and after BS. MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science databases were searched, and the effect of different surgical procedures and degrees of body mass index (BMI) reduction on FGF-19 levels was assessed by DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model in meta-analysis and dose-response analyses. This meta-analysis, which included 474 patients from 25 arms undergoing one of five BS procedures, revealed a significant increase in the levels of circulating FGF-19 following all-type BS. Vertical sleeve gastrectomy, duodenal-jejunal bypass liner and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass all significantly increased circulating FGF-19 levels from baseline. However, gastric banding failed to achieve the same, and in fact, biliopancreatic diversion was associated with decreased circulating FGF-19. Finally, an inverse association between FGF-19 and the degree of BMI-reduction post-operatively was noted. FGF-19 is increased by BS and may represent a pharmaceutical target in efforts to reproduce the beneficial effects of BS in a medical setting.
Topics: Bariatric Surgery; Fibroblast Growth Factors; Humans
PubMed: 32329176
DOI: 10.1111/obr.13038