-
The Journal of Sexual Medicine Sep 20165α-Reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) are widely used for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and androgenetic alopecia (AGA). (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
5α-Reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) are widely used for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and androgenetic alopecia (AGA).
AIM
To review all the available data on the effect of 5ARIs on sexual function and assess whether 5ARIs increase the risk of sexual dysfunction.
METHODS
A systematic search of the literature was conducted using the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The search was limited to articles published in English and up to October 2015. Article selection proceeded according to the search strategy based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses criteria. Data were analyzed using Stata 12.0. A fixed- or a random-effects model was used to calculate the overall combined risk estimates. Publication bias was assessed using Begg and Egger tests.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Sexual dysfunction, erectile dysfunction, and decreased libido.
RESULTS
After screening 493 articles, 17 randomized controlled trials with 17,494 patients were included. Nine studies evaluated the efficacy of 5ARIs in men with BPH. The other eight reported using 5ARIs in the treatment of men with AGA. The mean age of participants was 60.10 years across all studies. We included 10 trials (6,779 patients) on the efficacy and safety of finasteride, 4 trials (6,222 patients) on the safety and tolerability of dutasteride, and 3 trials (4,493 patients) using finasteride and dutasteride for AGA. The pooled relative risks for sexual dysfunction were 2.56 (95% CI = 1.48-4.42) in men with BPH and 1.21 (95% CI = 0.85-1.72) in men with AGA; those for erectile dysfunction were 1.55 (95% CI = 1.14-2.12) in men with BPH and 0.66 (95% CI = 0.20-2.25) in men with AGA; and those for decreased libido were 1.69 (95% CI = 1.03-2.79) in men with BPH and 1.16 (95% CI = 0.50-2.72) in men with AGA. Estimates of the total effects were generally consistent with the sensitivity analysis. No evidence of publication bias was observed.
CONCLUSION
Evidence from the randomized controlled trials suggested that 5ARIs were associated with increased adverse effects on sexual function in men with BPH compared with placebo. However, the association was not statistically significant in men with AGA. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are indicated to study further the mechanism and effects of 5ARIs on sexual function.
Topics: 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ejaculation; Erectile Dysfunction; Finasteride; Humans; Libido; Male; Middle Aged; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 27475241
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.07.006 -
Central European Journal of Urology 2021The clinical effect of pharmacotherapy on prostate morphometric parameters is largely unknown. The sole exception is 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) that reduce...
The effect of pharmacotherapy on prostate volume, prostate perfusion and prostate-specific antigen (prostate morphometric parameters) in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION
The clinical effect of pharmacotherapy on prostate morphometric parameters is largely unknown. The sole exception is 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) that reduce prostate volume and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). This review assesses the effect of pharmacotherapy on prostate parameters effect on prostate parameters, namely total prostate volume (TPV), transitional zone volume (TZV), PSA and prostate perfusion.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting on morphometric parameters' changes after pharmacotherapy, as primary or secondary outcomes. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. RCTs' quality was assessed by the Cochrane tool and the criteria of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The effect magnitude was expressed as standard mean difference (SMD). The study protocol was published on PROSPERO (CRD42020170172).
RESULTS
Sixty-seven RCTs were included in the review and 18 in the meta-analysis. The changes after alpha-blockers are comparable to placebo. Long-term studies reporting significant changes from baseline, result from physiologic growth. Finasteride and dutasteride demonstrated large effect sizes in TPV reduction ([SMD]: -1.15 (95% CI: -1.26 to -1.04, p <0.001, and [SMD]:-0.66 (95% CI: -0.83 to -0.49, p <0.001, respectively), and similar PSA reductions. Dutasteride's effect appears earlier (1 vs 3 month), the changes reach a maximum at month 12 and are sustained thereafter. Phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE-5) inhibitors have no effect on morphometric parameters. Phytotherapy's effect on TPV is non-significant [SMD]: 0.12 (95% CI: -0.03 to 0.27, p = 0.13). Atorvastatin reduces TPV as compared to placebo (-11.7% vs +2.5%, p <0.01). Co-administration of testosterone with dutasteride spares the prostate from the androgenic stimulation as both TPV and PSA are reduced significantly.
CONCLUSIONS
The 5-ARIs show large effect size in reducing TPV and PSA. Tamsulosin improves perfusion but no other effect is evident. PDE-5 inhibitors and phytotherapy do not affect morphometric parameters. Atorvastatin reduces TPV and PSA as opposed to testosterone supplementation.
PubMed: 34729231
DOI: 10.5173/ceju.2021.132.R1 -
The Journal of Sexual Medicine Jun 2014Several drugs, currently used to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), can be associated with bothersome sexual side... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Several drugs, currently used to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), can be associated with bothersome sexual side effects, including ejaculatory dysfunction (EjD).
AIM
To provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting the impact of medical treatments for LUTS due to BPH on ejaculatory function.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
EjD related to medical treatments for LUTS.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane databases. EjD was identified using both free text ("ejaculat*," "retrograde ejaculation," "anejaculation," "ejaculatory dysfunction") and Mesh ("Ejaculation") searches.
RESULTS
Of 101 retrieved articles, 23 were included in the present meta-analysis. EjD was significantly more common with alpha-blockers (ABs) than with placebo (OR:5.88; P < 0.0001), in particular, considering Tamsulosin (OR:8.58; P = 0.006) or Silodosin (OR:32.5; P < 0.0001), with Tamsulosin associated with significantly lower risk of EjD than Silodosin (OR:0.09; P < 0.00001). Conversely, Doxazosin and Terazosin were associated with a risk similar to placebo. Meta-regression showed that EjD was associated with IPSS and with Qmax both before and after treatment with ABs, while multivariate analysis demonstrated that EjD was independently associated with the improvement of IPSS (adj.r:0.2012; P < 0.0001) and Qmax (adj.r:0.522; P < 0.0001). EjD was significantly more common with 5ARIs as compared with placebo (OR:2.73; P < 0.0001). Both Finasteride (OR 2.70; P < 0.0001) and Dutasteride (OR 2.81; P = 0.0002) were associated with significantly higher risk of EjD than placebo. EjD was significantly more common with combination therapy as compared with ABs alone (OR:3.75; P < 0.0001),or with 5ARIs alone (OR:2.76; P = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS
ABs and 5ARI were both associated with significantly higher risk of EjD than placebo. More the AB is effective over time, greater is the incidence of EjD. Finasteride has the same risk of Dutasteride to cause EjD. Combination therapy with ABs and 5ARIs resulted in a 3-fold increased risk of EjD as compared with ABs or 5ARIs alone. These data can be relevant both for drug selection and patients counseling.
Topics: Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists; Azasteroids; Doxazosin; Dutasteride; Ejaculation; Finasteride; Humans; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Male; Prostatic Hyperplasia; Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological; Sulfonamides; Tamsulosin; Urological Agents
PubMed: 24708055
DOI: 10.1111/jsm.12525 -
Age and Ageing Sep 2015we aimed to systematically review drugs to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) regularly used in older persons to classify appropriate and inappropriate drugs... (Review)
Review
Appropriateness of oral drugs for long-term treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in older persons: results of a systematic literature review and international consensus validation process (LUTS-FORTA 2014).
AIM
we aimed to systematically review drugs to treat lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) regularly used in older persons to classify appropriate and inappropriate drugs based on efficacy, safety and tolerability by using the Fit fOR The Aged (FORTA) classification.
METHODS
to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of drugs used for treatment of LUTS in older persons, a systematic review was performed. Papers on clinical trials and summaries of individual product characteristics were analysed regarding efficacy and safety in older persons (≥65 years). The most frequently used drugs were selected based on current prescription data. An interdisciplinary international expert panel assessed the drugs in a Delphi process.
RESULTS
for the 16 drugs included here, a total of 896 citations were identified; of those, only 25 reported clinical trials with explicit data on, or solely performed in older people, underlining the lack of evidence in older people for drug treatment of LUTS. No drug was rated at the FORTA-A-level (indispensable). Only three were assigned to FORTA B (beneficial): dutasteride, fesoterodine and finasteride. The majority was rated FORTA C (questionable): darifenacin, mirabegron, extended release oxybutynin, silodosin, solifenacin, tadalafil, tamsulosin, tolterodine and trospium. FORTA D (avoid) was assigned to alfuzosin, doxazosin, immediate release oxybutynin, propiverine and terazosin.
CONCLUSIONS
dutasteride, fesoterodine and finasteride were classified as beneficial in older persons or frail elderly people (FORTA B). For most drugs, in particular those from the group of α-blockers and antimuscarinics, use in this group seems questionable (FORTA C) or should be avoided (FORTA D).
Topics: 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors; Administration, Oral; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Age Factors; Aged; Aging; Consensus; Delphi Technique; Humans; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Muscarinic Antagonists; Patient Selection; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Urological Agents
PubMed: 26104505
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afv077 -
Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy :... Jun 2024We aimed to determine the efficacy of the various available oral, topical, and procedural treatment options for hair loss in individuals with androgenic alopecia. Using...
We aimed to determine the efficacy of the various available oral, topical, and procedural treatment options for hair loss in individuals with androgenic alopecia. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the National Library of Medicine was performed. Overall, 141 unique studies met our inclusion criteria. We demonstrate that many over the counter (e.g. topical minoxidil, supplements, low-level light treatment), prescription (e.g. oral minoxidil, finasteride, dutasteride), and procedural (e.g. platelet-rich plasma, fractionated lasers, hair transplantation) treatments successfully promote hair growth, highlighting the superiority of a multifaceted and individualized approach to management.
PubMed: 38852607
DOI: 10.1080/14764172.2024.2362126 -
The Aging Male : the Official Journal... Sep 2016Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) represent one of the most common clinical complaints in adult men. Several drugs used... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Impact of combination therapy 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) plus alpha-blockers (AB) on erectile dysfunction and decrease of libido in patients with LUTS/BPH: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) represent one of the most common clinical complaints in adult men. Several drugs used for LUTS/BPO may strongly affect sexual function and bother. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of combination therapy with alpha-blockers (AB), 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARI) on the risk of erectile dysfunction(ED) and libido alterations (LA) from randomized clinical trial (RCT). Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, five RCTs involving 6131 patients were included in the analysis. According to the analysis, the overall prevalence of ED and LA were significantly greater in the combination treatment group than in the AB group (7.93% versus 4.66%; OR 1.81; p < 0.0001 and 3.69% versus 2.36%; OR 1.58; p = 0.003, respectively). The combination therapy increased the risk of ED compared to monotherapy with 5-ARI (7.93% versus 6.47%; OR 1.25; p = 0.04) but not the risk of LA (3.51% versus 3.37; OR 1.03; p = 0.84). In our systematic meta-analysis, we demonstrated that combination therapy with ABs and 5-ARIs was associated with significantly higher risk of ED and LA compared with single monotherapy. Combination therapy showed similar risk of LA compared with 5-ARI monotherapy.
Topics: 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors; Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists; Drug Therapy, Combination; Erectile Dysfunction; Humans; Libido; Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms; Male; Prostatic Hyperplasia
PubMed: 27310433
DOI: 10.1080/13685538.2016.1195361 -
Systematic review evaluating cardiovascular events of the 5-alpha reductase inhibitor - Dutasteride.Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and... Oct 2013A recently published large, long-term randomized controlled trial (RCT) brought into question the safety of dutasteride after a significantly increased risk of 'cardiac... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES
A recently published large, long-term randomized controlled trial (RCT) brought into question the safety of dutasteride after a significantly increased risk of 'cardiac failure' was noted in the dutasteride arm of the trial compared with placebo. Our objective was to perform a meta-analysis to assess the risk of cardiovascular adverse events with the use of dutasteride for the prevention or treatment of prostatic disease.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE, unpublished articles identified through FDA/EMEA websites, study registers of pharmaceutical companies and reference lists of articles. Parallel-group, randomized controlled trials where men received dutasteride for the prevention of prostate cancer or treatment of prostatic hyperplasia against any comparator intervention were included. Heart failure was the primary outcome of interest but we also looked at myocardial infarction and stroke. Fixed-effect meta-analysis of pooled relative risk (RR) ratios of adverse effect outcomes was conducted.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In all, 12 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis after detailed screening of 564 citations. The total number of participants was 18,802, and study duration ranged from 6 to 208 weeks. Only two trials provided details on adequate allocation concealment, whereas all the trials stated they were double blind in nature. Dutasteride was not associated with a statistically significant increased risk of heart failure (RR 1·05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0·71-1·57, I(2) = 20%), myocardial infarction (RR 1·00; 95% CI 0·77-1·30, I(2) = 0%) and stroke (RR, 1·20; 95% CI 0·88-1·64, I(2) = 0%) as compared to controls.
WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION
We did not find consistent evidence of a significant association between dutasteride therapy and the risk of cardiovascular adverse events.
Topics: 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors; Azasteroids; Cardiovascular Diseases; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Dutasteride; Humans; Male; Prostatic Diseases; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk
PubMed: 23815285
DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.12080 -
Oncotarget May 2017High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is the precursor or premalignant form of prostate cancer. At least 30% patients with a confirmed HGPIN will... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) is the precursor or premalignant form of prostate cancer. At least 30% patients with a confirmed HGPIN will develop prostate cancer within 1 year after repeated biopsy. HGPIN patients are the appropriate at-risk population for chemoprevention strategies investigation against prostate cancer. However the commonly used chemoprevention agents that targeted on hormonal imbalance or lifestyle-related factors showed varied results in HGPIN patients.
METHODS
Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library according to Cochrane guidelines before January 31st, 2017. Direct meta-analysis were performed to summarize the efficacy of candidate chemopreventative agents Dutasteride, Flutamide, Toremifene, Selenium, Green tea components, Lycopene and natural food products combination. Adjusted indirect meta-analyses were employed to compare the relative efficacy of these candidate chemoprevention agents head-to-head.
RESULTS
The overall incidence of prostate cancer in HGPIN was slightly decreased by chemoprevention agents (25.7% vs 31.5%, RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.83-1.03, P = 0.183), with minor heterogeneity (I2 = 22.3%, ð2 = 15.08, P = 0.237), but without statistical significance. Subgroup analysis showed that green tea catechins significantly decreased prostate cancer in HGPIN patients (7.60% vs 23.1%, RR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.16-10.97, P P = 0.044), with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 47.9%, ð2 = 1.92, P = 0.166). The adjusted indirect meta-analysis favored green tea catechins over other chemoprevention agents, and significantly when compared to natural food products combination (RR = 0.355, 95% CI: 0.134-0.934).
CONCLUSION
The overall efficacy of chemoprevention agents in HGPIN patients is limited. But Green tea catechins showed the superiority to decrease prostate cancer in HGPIN patients.
Topics: Anticarcinogenic Agents; Biological Products; Chemoprevention; Humans; Male; Odds Ratio; Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia; Prostatic Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28415774
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.16230 -
American Journal of Clinical Oncology Apr 2020To indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of systemic therapies used for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of systemic therapies used for patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC).
METHODS
The relevant randomized controlled trials were retrieved from PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Network meta-analyses were used to compare multiple drugs simultaneously for the outcomes of nmCRPC. Direct evidence in trials and indirect evidence across trials were combined by the network meta-analyses to estimate the treatment efficiency.
OUTCOME
Eight studies were included in our research. For prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival, the rate of progression was significantly decreased following apalutamide, enzalutamide, bicalutamide+dutasteride, and bicalutamide treatment compared with placebo. Compared with placebo treatment, metastases-free survival was significantly increased in patients who received apalutamide (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.35), enzalutamide (HR: 0.29, 95% CI: 0.24-0.35), and darolutamide (HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.35-0.50). Direct comparison showed significant survival benefits in patients who received second-generation anti-androgen therapy (apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide: HR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.61-0.91) compared with patients who received placebo. With respect to metastases-free survival, based on SUCRA analysis, there was 80% and 78% probability that apalutamide and enzalutamide were preferred treatment, while darolutamide was likely to be second-best choice. Compared with placebo, all agents were not associated with significantly higher likelihood of serious adverse events and grade 3 to 4 adverse events.
CONCLUSION
Our outcomes support equivalent efficacy and similar risk of adverse effects between apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide, supporting the use of these antiandrogen agents in high-risk of progression nmCRPC.
Topics: Humans; Male; Network Meta-Analysis; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31972568
DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000660 -
5-α-Reductase inhibitors for prostate cancer chemoprevention: an updated Cochrane systematic review.BJU International Nov 2010• To estimate the benefits and harms of 5-α-reductase inhibitors (5-α-RIs) in preventing prostate cancer. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
• To estimate the benefits and harms of 5-α-reductase inhibitors (5-α-RIs) in preventing prostate cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
• We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Collaboration Library through June 2010 to identify randomized trials. • We included articles if they examined 5-α-RI vs control, were ≥ 1 year in duration and provided clinical outcomes. • Our primary outcome was prostate cancer period-prevalence 'for-cause'.
RESULTS
• Eight studies met inclusion criteria but only the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial and the Reduction by Dutasteride of Prostate Cancer Events were designed to assess the impact of 5-α-RIs on prostate cancer period-prevalence. The mean age of enrolees was 64 years, 92% were White, and mean PSA level was 3.1 ng/mL. For-cause prostate cancers comprised 54% of all cancers detected in placebo-controlled studies. • Compared with placebo, 5-α-RI resulted in a 25% relative risk (RR) reduction in prostate cancers detected for-cause [RR 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67-0.83; 1.4% absolute risk reduction (3.5% vs 4.9%)]. One BPH trial reported that the risk of prostate cancers detected for-cause was significantly reduced with dutasteride and combined dutasteride plus tamsulosin compared with tamsulosin monotherapy. • Six trials vs placebo assessed prostate cancers detected overall. There was a 26% RR reduction favouring 5-α-RI [RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-1.00; 2.9% absolute risk reduction (6.3% vs 9.2%)]. There were reductions across categories of age, race and family history of prostate cancer. • One placebo-controlled trial of men that investigators considered at greater risk for prostate cancer (based on age, elevated PSA level and having a previous suspicion of prostate cancer leading to a prostate biopsy) reported that dutasteride did not reduce prostate cancers detected for-cause based on needle-biopsy but did reduce risk of overall incident prostate cancer detected by biopsy by 23%[RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.70-0.85; absolute reduction 16.1% vs 20.8%]. There were reductions across age, family history of prostate cancer, PSA level, and prostate volume subgroups. • Incidences of erectile dysfunction, ejaculate volume, decreased libido, and gynaecomastia were greater with 5-α-RI vs placebo.
CONCLUSIONS
• 5-α-RIs reduce the risk of being diagnosed with prostate cancer among men who are screened regularly for prostate cancer. • Information is inadequate to assess the effect of 5-α-RIs on prostate cancer or all-cause mortality. • 5-α-RIs increase sexual and erectile dysfunction.
Topics: 5-alpha Reductase Inhibitors; Aged; Anticarcinogenic Agents; Azasteroids; Dutasteride; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prostatic Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 20977593
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09714.x