-
Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung. C,... Jan 2023The COVID-19 mainly causes respiratory disorders with high infection and severe morbidity and mortality. Neurologists have concerns about potential neurological side... (Review)
Review
The COVID-19 mainly causes respiratory disorders with high infection and severe morbidity and mortality. Neurologists have concerns about potential neurological side effects, profits, and timing of COVID-19 vaccines. This study aimed to review systematically research for the COVID-19 vaccine and neurological complications. Data was searched in Scopus, ISI web of knowledge, Medline, PubMed, Wiley, Embase, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and Clinical Trials, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Two reviewer authors individually searched and assessed the titles and abstracts of all articles. The third reviewer resolved disagreement between them. Data were documented regarding study location, study design, type of complications, number of patients, various types of COVID-19 vaccine, and type of neurological complications. Six studies in COVID-19 vaccine and neurological complications include two studies about neurological manifestations after the mRNA vaccines, four records about side effects of vector-based vaccine were included in the study. The main neurological complication associated mRNA vaccines were body aches, paresthesia, and difficulty walking, erythema migrans lesion, fatigue, myalgia, and pain in the left lateral deltoid region. The major neurological complication related to vector-based vaccines were urinary retention difficulty, feeding and ambulating, arm soreness, mild fatigue, chills, left-sided facial droop, headaches, a generalized epileptic seizure, hemianopia, and mild aphasia, acute somnolence and right-hand hemiparesis, acute transverse myelitis, deep vein thrombosis in her left leg, a vigilance disorder and a twitching, a severe immobilizing opsoclonus myoclonus syndrome, and encephalitis. A large spectrum of severe neurological unfavorable has been reported. These complications could occur as a result of molecular stimulation and later neuronal damage. Generally, the advantages of COVID-19 vaccination are dominant on the risks of a neurological complication at both individual and population levels. Future investigations will be required to find any relationship between neurological complications and COVID-19 vaccines principally as new strains of the virus and new vaccines are technologically advanced against them.
Topics: Humans; Female; COVID-19 Vaccines; COVID-19
PubMed: 36087300
DOI: 10.1515/znc-2022-0092 -
Schizophrenia Research Feb 2020Voice atypicalities have been a characteristic feature of schizophrenia since its first definitions. They are often associated with core negative symptoms such as flat... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Voice atypicalities have been a characteristic feature of schizophrenia since its first definitions. They are often associated with core negative symptoms such as flat affect and alogia, and with the social impairments seen in the disorder. This suggests that voice atypicalities may represent a marker of clinical features and social functioning in schizophrenia. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the evidence for distinctive acoustic patterns in schizophrenia, as well as their relation to clinical features. We identified 46 articles, including 55 studies with a total of 1254 patients with schizophrenia and 699 healthy controls. Summary effect sizes (Hedges'g and Pearson's r) estimates were calculated using multilevel Bayesian modeling. We identified weak atypicalities in pitch variability (g = -0.55) related to flat affect, and stronger atypicalities in proportion of spoken time, speech rate, and pauses (g's between -0.75 and -1.89) related to alogia and flat affect. However, the effects were mostly modest (with the important exception of pause duration) compared to perceptual and clinical judgments, and characterized by large heterogeneity between studies. Moderator analyses revealed that tasks with a more demanding cognitive and social component showed larger effects both in contrasting patients and controls and in assessing symptomatology. In conclusion, studies of acoustic patterns are a promising but, yet unsystematic avenue for establishing markers of schizophrenia. We outline recommendations towards more cumulative, open, and theory-driven research.
Topics: Aphasia; Bayes Theorem; Humans; Schizophrenia; Speech; Voice
PubMed: 31839552
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.11.031 -
BMC Emergency Medicine Sep 2019Recanalisation therapy in acute ischaemic stroke is highly time-sensitive, and requires early identification of eligible patients to ensure better outcomes. Thus, a...
INTRODUCTION
Recanalisation therapy in acute ischaemic stroke is highly time-sensitive, and requires early identification of eligible patients to ensure better outcomes. Thus, a number of clinical assessment tools have been developed and this review examines their diagnostic capabilities.
METHODS
Diagnostic performance of currently available clinical tools for identification of acute ischaemic and haemorrhagic strokes and stroke mimicking conditions was reviewed. A systematic search of the literature published in 2015-2018 was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and The Cochrane Library. Prehospital and in-hospital studies with a minimum sample size of 300 patients reporting diagnostic accuracy were selected.
RESULTS
Twenty-five articles were included. Cortical signs (gaze deviation, aphasia and neglect) were shown to be significant indicators of large vessel occlusion (LVO). Sensitivity values for selecting subjects with LVO ranged from 23 to 99% whereas specificity was 24 to 97%. Clinical tools, such as FAST-ED, NIHSS, and RACE incorporating cortical signs as well as motor dysfunction demonstrated the best diagnostic accuracy. Tools for identification of stroke mimics showed sensitivity varying from 44 to 91%, and specificity of 27 to 98% with the best diagnostic performance demonstrated by FABS (90% sensitivity, 91% specificity). Hypertension and younger age predicted intracerebral haemorrhage whereas history of atrial fibrillation and diabetes were associated with ischaemia. There was a variation in approach used to establish the definitive diagnosis. Blinding of the index test assessment was not specified in about 50% of included studies.
CONCLUSIONS
A wide range of clinical assessment tools for selecting subjects with acute stroke has been developed in recent years. Assessment of both cortical and motor function using RACE, FAST-ED and NIHSS showed the best diagnostic accuracy values for selecting subjects with LVO. There were limited data on clinical tools that can be used to differentiate between acute ischaemia and haemorrhage. Diagnostic accuracy appeared to be modest for distinguishing between acute stroke and stroke mimics with optimal diagnostic performance demonstrated by the FABS tool. Further prehospital research is required to improve the diagnostic utility of clinical assessments with possible application of a two-step clinical assessment or involvement of simple brain imaging, such as transcranial ultrasonography.
Topics: Diagnosis, Differential; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Sensitivity and Specificity; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke
PubMed: 31484499
DOI: 10.1186/s12873-019-0262-1 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine May 2021It was to examine the influence of preoperative doctor-patient communication (D-PC) on surgery, and to improve the postoperative recovery effect of patients via... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
It was to examine the influence of preoperative doctor-patient communication (D-PC) on surgery, and to improve the postoperative recovery effect of patients via meta-analysis.
METHODS
Meta-analysis was performed to study the influence of preoperative D-PC on surgery and improve the postoperative recovery effect of patients. Boolean logic search method was adopted, and "Preoperative communication", "psychological counseling", "Surgical effect", and "D-PC" were set as search terms. Literature retrieval of PubMed, Medline, and CNKI from the establishment to the present was conducted. Literatures that performed comparative studies and set group without preoperative communication between doctors and patients as a control were screened. Review Manager (RevMan) was adopted to carry out meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Fifteen papers were selected in this analysis, most of which were of low-risk bias (medium or high quality). Meta-analysis revealed that there was no statistical heterogeneity in postoperative speech function between control and experimental groups (Chi2 =1.04, I2=0%, P=0.96), and postoperative speech function of experimental group was remarkably better in contrast to control group (Z=4.09, P<0.00001). No statistical heterogeneity was found in the Asiatic aphasia test (AAT) results between two groups (Chi2 =3.77, I2=0%, P=0.44), and there was no considerable difference in AAT test results between groups (Z=1.37, P=0.17). There was statistical heterogeneity in the postoperative quality of life scores between different groups (Chi2 =115.99, I2=97%, P<0.00001), and postoperative quality of life scores of patients in experimental group were greatly superior to the control (Z=1.98, P=0.05). There was statistical heterogeneity in daily communication ability between groups (Chi2 =14.60, I2=73%, P=0.006), and daily communication ability of patients in experimental group was substantially stronger in contrast to the control (Z=7.40, P<0.00001).
DISCUSSION
Through meta-analysis methods, it was found that preoperative D-PC can effectively improve the postoperative speech function and daily communication ability recovery of patients, the postoperative quality of life, and the postoperative recovery of patients.
Topics: Counseling; Humans; Physician-Patient Relations; Quality of Life; Surgical Procedures, Operative
PubMed: 34107721
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-1058 -
Neuropsychology Review Oct 2023Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS) are neurodegenerative syndromes characterized by progressive decline in language or... (Review)
Review
Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) and primary progressive apraxia of speech (PPAOS) are neurodegenerative syndromes characterized by progressive decline in language or speech. There is a growing number of studies investigating speech-language interventions for PPA/PPAOS. An updated systematic evaluation of the treatment evidence is warranted to inform best clinical practice and guide future treatment research. We systematically reviewed the evidence for behavioral treatment for speech and language in this population. Reviewed articles were published in peer-reviewed journals through 31 May 2021. We evaluated level of evidence, reporting quality, and risk of bias using a modified version of the American Speech-Language Hearing Association (ASHA) Levels of Evidence, an appraisal point system, additional reporting quality and internal/external validity items, and, as appropriate, the Single Case Experimental Design Scale or the Physiotherapy Evidence Database - PsycBITE Rating Scale for Randomized and Non-Randomized Controlled Trials. Results were synthesized using quantitative summaries and narrative review. A total of 103 studies reported treatment outcomes for 626 individuals with PPA; no studies used the diagnostic label PPAOS. Most studies evaluated interventions for word retrieval. The highest-quality evidence was provided by 45 experimental and quasi-experimental studies (16 controlled group studies, 29 single-subject designs). All (k = 45/45) reported improvement on a primary outcome measure; most reported generalization (k = 34/43), maintenance (k = 34/39), or social validity (k = 17/19) of treatment for at least one participant. The available evidence supports speech-language intervention for persons with PPA; however, treatment for PPAOS awaits systematic investigation. Implications and limitations of the evidence and the review are discussed.
PubMed: 37792075
DOI: 10.1007/s11065-023-09607-1 -
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease : JAD 2023Semantic and Phonological fluency (SF and PF) are routinely evaluated in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). There are disagreements in the literature regarding... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Semantic and Phonological fluency (SF and PF) are routinely evaluated in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). There are disagreements in the literature regarding which fluency task is more affected while developing AD. Most studies focus on SF assessment, given its connection with the temporoparietal amnesic system. PF is less reported, it is related to working memory, which is also impaired in probable and diagnosed AD. Differentiating between performance on these tasks might be informative in early AD diagnosis, providing an accurate linguistic profile.
OBJECTIVE
Compare SF and PF performance in healthy volunteers, volunteers with probable AD, and patients with AD diagnosis, considering the heterogeneity of age, gender, and educational level variables.
METHODS
A total of 8 studies were included for meta-analysis, reaching a sample size of 1,270 individuals (568 patients diagnosed with AD, 340 with probable AD diagnosis, and 362 healthy volunteers).
RESULTS
The three groups consistently performed better on SF than PF. When progressing to a diagnosis of AD, we observed a significant difference in SF and PF performance across our 3 groups of interest (p = 0.04). The age variable explained a proportion of this difference in task performance across the groups, and as age increases, both tasks equally worsen.
CONCLUSION
The performance of SF and PF might play a differential role in early AD diagnosis. These tasks rely on partially different neural bases of language processing. They are thus worth exploring independently in diagnosing normal aging and its transition to pathological stages, including probable and diagnosed AD.
Topics: Humans; Semantics; Alzheimer Disease; Verbal Behavior; Neuropsychological Tests; Linguistics
PubMed: 37482994
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-221272 -
Current Pain and Headache Reports Jan 2020Although visual and somatosensory disturbances are the most common migraine aura (MA) symptoms, patients can also experience other symptoms during their MA. The aim of...
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW
Although visual and somatosensory disturbances are the most common migraine aura (MA) symptoms, patients can also experience other symptoms during their MA. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of studies that report symptoms of dysphasia and other higher cortical dysfunctions (HCDs) during MA, as well as to determine the frequency of HCDs.
RECENT FINDINGS
Five studies met the inclusion criteria, corresponding to 697 patients overall. The most frequently reported HCDs were those of the language group (range 10-53%). The occurrence of visual HCDs was noted in 12-40 patients, somatosensory HCDs in 12-20%, and memory disturbances in 10-22% of the patients during MAs. MA is associated with a wide range of neurological symptoms, including symptoms of HCD. A better strategy for investigation of the HCD symptoms is needed to correctly stratify patients thus allowing meaningful studies of aura pathophysiology.
Topics: Aphasia; Apraxias; Cerebral Cortex; Humans; Memory Disorders; Migraine with Aura; Somatosensory Disorders
PubMed: 31981018
DOI: 10.1007/s11916-020-0836-3 -
Journal of Neurosurgery. Pediatrics Dec 2023Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) are aggressive and malignant tumors of the brainstem. Stereotactic biopsy can obtain molecular and genetic information for...
OBJECTIVE
Diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) are aggressive and malignant tumors of the brainstem. Stereotactic biopsy can obtain molecular and genetic information for diagnostic and potentially therapeutic purposes. However, there is no consensus on the safety of biopsy or effect on survival. The authors aimed to characterize neurological risk associated with and the effect of stereotactic biopsy on survival among patients with DIPGs.
METHODS
A systematic review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to identify all studies examining pediatric patients with DIPG who underwent stereotactic biopsy. The search strategy was deployed in PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. The quality of studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, and risk of bias was evaluated with the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies-of Interventions tool. Bibliographic, demographic, clinical, and outcome data were extracted from studies meeting inclusion criteria.
RESULTS
Of 2634 resultant articles, 13 were included, representing 192 patients undergoing biopsy. The weighted mean age at diagnosis was 7.5 years (range 0.5-17 years). There was an overall neurosurgical complication rate of 13.02% (25/192). The most common neurosurgical complication was cranial nerve palsy (4.2%, 8/192), of which cranial nerve VII was the most common (37.5%, 3/8). The second most common complication was perioperative hemorrhage (3.6%, 7/192), followed by hemiparesis (2.1%, 4/192), speech disorders (1.6%, 3/192) such as dysarthria and dysphasia, and movement disorders (1.0%, 2/192). Hydrocephalus was less commonly reported (0.5%, 1/192), and there were no complications relating to wound infection/dehiscence (0%, 0/192) or CSF leak (0%, 0/192). No mortality was specifically attributed to biopsy. Diagnostic yield of biopsy revealed a weighted mean of 97.4% (range 91%-100%). Of the studies reporting survival data, 37.6% (32/85) of patients died within the study follow-up period (range 2 weeks-48 months). The mean overall survival in patients undergoing biopsy was 9.73 months (SD 0.68, median 10 months, range 6-13 months).
CONCLUSIONS
Children with DIPGs undergoing biopsy have mild to moderate rates of neurosurgical complications and no excessive morbidity. With reasonably acceptable surgical risk and high diagnostic yield, stereotactic biopsy of DIPGs can allow for characterization of patient-specific molecular and genetic features that may influence prognosis and the development of future therapeutic strategies.
Topics: Humans; Child; Infant; Child, Preschool; Adolescent; Glioma; Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma; Brain Stem Neoplasms; Biopsy
PubMed: 37724839
DOI: 10.3171/2023.7.PEDS22462 -
Journal of Communication Disorders 2023Prosody serves central functions in language processing including linguistic functions (linguistic prosody), like structuring the speech signal. Impairments in... (Review)
Review
A systematic review on production and comprehension of linguistic prosody in people with acquired language and communication disorders resulting from unilateral brain lesions.
BACKGROUND
Prosody serves central functions in language processing including linguistic functions (linguistic prosody), like structuring the speech signal. Impairments in production and comprehension of linguistic prosody have been described for persons with unilateral right (RHDP) or left hemisphere damage (LHDP). However, reported results differ with respect to the characteristics and severities of these impairments AIMS: We conducted a systematic literature review focusing on production and comprehension of linguistic prosody at the prosody-syntax interface (i.e., phrase or sentence level) in LHDP and RHDP.
METHODS & PROCEDURES
In a systematic literature search we included: (i) empirical studies with (ii) adult RHDP and/or LHDP (iii) investigating production and/or comprehension of linguistic prosody at the (iv) phrase or sentence level (v) reporting quantitative data on prosodic measures. We excluded overview papers; studies involving participants with dysarthria, apraxia of speech, foreign accent syndrome, psychiatric diseases, and/or neurodegenerative diseases; studies focusing primarily on emotional prosody; and on lexical stress / word level; studies of which no full text was available and/or that were published in a language other than English. We searched the databases BIOSIS, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PSYNDEX, PsycINFO and speechBITE, last searched on January 13 2022.We found 2,631 studies without duplicates. We identified 43 studies which were included into our systematic review. For data extraction and synthesis of results, we grouped studies by (i) modality (production vs. comprehension), (ii) function (syntactic structure vs. information structure), and (iii) by experiment task. For production studies, outcome measures were defined as the productive use of the different prosodic cues (lengthening, pause, f0, amplitude). For comprehension studies, performance measures (accuracy and reaction times) were defined as outcome measures. In accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statement (Page et al., 2021), we conducted a quality check to assess study risk of bias. Our review was pre-registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019120308).
OUTCOMES & RESULTS
Of the 43 studies reviewed, 30 studies involved RHDP (n = 309), assessing production in 15 studies and focusing on comprehension of prosody in 16 studies (one study investigated production and comprehension). LHDP (n = 438) were included in 35 studies of which 15 studied production and 21 evaluated comprehension of prosody (one study investigated production and comprehension). Despite the heterogeneity of results in the studies reviewed, our synthesis of results suggests that both LHDP and RHDP show limitations, but no complete impairment, in their production and/or comprehension of linguistic prosody. Prosodic limitations are evident in different areas of processing linguistic prosody, like syntactic disambiguation or the distinction between sentence types. There is a tendency towards more severe limitations in LHDP as compared to RHDP.
CONCLUSIONS
We only included published studies into our review and did not perform an assessment of risk of reporting bias as well as systematic certainty assessments of the outcomes. Despite these limitations, we conclude that both groups show deficits in production and comprehension of linguistic prosody, but neither LHDP nor RHDP are completely impaired in their prosodic processing. This suggests that prosody is a relevant communicative resource for LHDP and RHDP worth being addressed in speech-language-therapy.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Comprehension; Language; Linguistics; Communication Disorders; Brain; Speech Perception
PubMed: 36623377
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2022.106298 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2022Currently, little is known about Chinese-speaking primary progressive aphasia (PPA) patients compared to patients who speak Indo-European languages. We examined the...
INTRODUCTION
Currently, little is known about Chinese-speaking primary progressive aphasia (PPA) patients compared to patients who speak Indo-European languages. We examined the demographics and clinical manifestations, particularly reading and writing characteristics, of Chinese patients with PPA over the last two decades to establish a comprehensive profile and improve diagnosis and care.
METHODS
We reviewed the demographic features, clinical manifestations, and radiological features of Chinese-speaking PPA patients from 56 articles published since 1994. We then summarized the specific reading and writing errors of Chinese-speaking patients.
RESULTS
The average age of onset for Chinese-speaking patients was in their early 60's, and there were slightly more male patients than female patients. The core symptoms and images of Chinese-speaking patients were similar to those of patients who speak Indo-European languages. Reading and writing error patterns differed due to Chinese's distinct tone and orthography. The types of reading errors reported in Chinese-speaking patients with PPA included tonal errors, regularization errors, visually related errors, semantic errors, phonological errors, unrelated errors, and non-response. Among these errors, regularization errors were the most common in semantic variant PPA, and tonal errors were specific to Chinese. Writing errors mainly consisted of non-character errors (stroke, radical/component, visual, pictograph, dyskinetic errors, and spatial errors), phonologically plausible errors, orthographically similar errors, semantic errors, compound word errors, sequence errors, unrelated errors, and non-response.
CONCLUSION
This paper provides the latest comprehensive demographic information and unique presentations on the reading and writing of Chinese-speaking patients with PPA. More detailed studies are needed to address the frequency of errors in reading and writing and their anatomical substrates.
PubMed: 36561305
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1025660