-
Psychosomatics 2016Hypersomnia is a common complaint in medical offices. Often patients are given psychiatric diagnoses, but a primary sleep disorder may be present. The new diagnosis of... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Hypersomnia is a common complaint in medical offices. Often patients are given psychiatric diagnoses, but a primary sleep disorder may be present. The new diagnosis of "hypersomnolence disorder" (HD) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition is a primary sleep disorder most similar to the diagnosis "idiopathic hypersomnia" (IH) in sleep literature and can be missed in psychiatric settings.
METHODS
A systematic review of the computerized databases PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Psychinfo using the search criteria "idiopathic AND (hypersomnolence OR hypersomnia)," as well as "hypersomnolence disorder was conducted." Articles were included if they were in English and included information regarding the epidemiology, diagnosis, pathophysiology, or treatment of IH or HD. Where relevant, weighted means and 95% CI were calculated based on the number of subjects in each study.
RESULTS
A total of 143 articles discussed IH, whereas no articles were found regarding HD. Most articles were review articles, prospective studies, or studies of pathophysiology. IH is found in approximately 0.02%-0.010% of the general population, has a mean age of onset of 21.8 years, and is associated with several somatic symptoms. Alterations in histaminergic or dopaminergic signaling may be involved in IH. Treatment with modafinil or other stimulants appears moderately effective. IH can be differentiated from psychiatric hypersomnolence by formal polysomnography.
CONCLUSIONS
IH and HD are relatively uncommon disorders and little is known about them. However, they are distinct from psychiatric disorders and respond well to treatment once properly identified.
Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Central Nervous System Stimulants; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Humans; Idiopathic Hypersomnia; Modafinil
PubMed: 26895727
DOI: 10.1016/j.psym.2015.12.006 -
Sleep Medicine Reviews Aug 2021Awareness of performance deficits and errors during sleep loss could be protective against the consequences of sleep deprivation, however, it is unclear whether sleep... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Awareness of performance deficits and errors during sleep loss could be protective against the consequences of sleep deprivation, however, it is unclear whether sleep deprived individuals have insight into their performance. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of sleep loss (sleep duration <6 h) on monitoring of performance and errors using Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO & Cochrane Central. We identified 28 studies, 11 of which were appropriate for meta-analysis. The systematic review indicated limited consensus regarding sleep loss impacts on performance monitoring, due to substantial differences in study methodology. However, participants typically demonstrated more conservative estimates of performance during sleep loss. Error-monitoring literature was more consistent, indicating an impairment in error-monitoring following sleep loss. Meta-analyses supported the findings of the systematic review. In terms of methodology, we found the performance monitoring literature is limited by an overreliance on correlational designs, which are likely confounded by response bias. The error-monitoring literature is limited by very few studies utilising behavioural measures to directly measure error-awareness. Future performance monitoring studies must employ methods which control for confounds such as bias, and error-monitoring studies must incorporate combined behavioural and ERP measures to better understand the impact of sleep loss on error-monitoring.
Topics: Humans; Sleep; Sleep Deprivation; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
PubMed: 33894599
DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101490 -
JAMA Nov 2022Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with adverse health outcomes. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with adverse health outcomes.
OBJECTIVE
To review the evidence on screening for OSA in asymptomatic adults or those with unrecognized OSA symptoms to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Embase, and trial registries through August 23, 2021; surveillance through September 23, 2022.
STUDY SELECTION
English-language studies of screening test accuracy, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of screening or treatment of OSA reporting health outcomes or harms, and systematic reviews of treatment reporting changes in blood pressure and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) scores.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Dual review of abstracts, full-text articles, and study quality. Meta-analysis of intervention trials.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Test accuracy, excessive daytime sleepiness, sleep-related and general health-related quality of life (QOL), and harms.
RESULTS
Eighty-six studies were included (N = 11 051). No study directly compared screening with no screening. Screening accuracy of the Multivariable Apnea Prediction score followed by unattended home sleep testing for detecting severe OSA syndrome (AHI ≥30 and Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] score >10) measured as the area under the curve in 2 studies (n = 702) was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.78 to 0.82) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77 to 0.90). Five studies assessing the accuracy of other screening tools were heterogeneous and results were inconsistent. Compared with inactive control, positive airway pressure was associated with a significant improvement in ESS score from baseline (pooled mean difference, -2.33 [95% CI, -2.75 to -1.90]; 47 trials; n = 7024), sleep-related QOL (standardized mean difference, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.42]; 17 trials; n = 3083), and general health-related QOL measured by the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) mental health component summary score change (pooled mean difference, 2.20 [95% CI, 0.95 to 3.44]; 15 trials; n = 2345) and SF-36 physical health component summary score change (pooled mean difference, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.29 to 2.77]; 13 trials; n = 2031). Use of mandibular advancement devices was also associated with a significantly larger ESS score change compared with controls (pooled mean difference, -1.67 [95% CI, 2.09 to -1.25]; 10 trials; n = 1540). Reporting of other health outcomes was sparse; no included trial found significant benefit associated with treatment on mortality, cardiovascular events, or motor vehicle crashes. In 3 systematic reviews, positive airway pressure was significantly associated with reduced blood pressure; however, the difference was relatively small (2-3 mm Hg).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
The accuracy and clinical utility of OSA screening tools that could be used in primary care settings were uncertain. Positive airway pressure and mandibular advancement devices reduced ESS score. Trials of positive airway pressure found modest improvement in sleep-related and general health-related QOL but have not established whether treatment reduces mortality or improves most other health outcomes.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Advisory Committees; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Quality of Life; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Mass Screening
PubMed: 36378203
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2022.18357 -
Journal of Sleep Research May 2024Obstructive sleep apnea is the most common sleep disorder. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of respiratory muscle training in the treatment of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Obstructive sleep apnea is the most common sleep disorder. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of respiratory muscle training in the treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The study protocol was registered in Prospero Platform (CRD42018096980). We performed searches in the main databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) via Pubmed; Excerpta Medica dataBASE (Embase) via Elsevier; Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via Cochrane Library; Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences (LILACS) through the Portal of the Virtual Health Library and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) for all randomised-controlled trials published before July 2022. The randomised-controlled trials were assessed for risk of bias and certainty of evidence. Thirteen randomised-controlled trials were included. All studies had an overall high risk of bias. Inspiratory muscle training probably improves systolic blood pressure and sleepiness when compared with sham. However, inspiratory muscle training probably does not improve diastolic blood pressure and maximum expiratory pressure, and may not be superior to sham for apnea-hypopnea index, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, forced vital capacity, sleep quality and quality of life. In addition, it is uncertain whether there is any effect of inspiratory muscle training on maximum inspiratory pressure and physical capacity. Inspiratory muscle training may also improve maximum inspiratory pressure and maximum expiratory pressure compared with oropharyngeal exercises. However, it may not be superior for apnea-hypopnea index, sleep quality, sleepiness, quality of life and functional capacity. When associated with physical exercise, inspiratory muscle training may not be superior to physical exercise alone for maximum inspiratory pressure, maximum expiratory pressure, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and functional capacity. At the same time, when associated with cardiac rehabilitation exercises, inspiratory muscle training may reduce apnea-hypopnea index, improve inspiratory muscle strength, sleepiness and sleep quality compared with cardiac rehabilitation alone. However, it may not be superior for improving quality of life. Regarding expiratory muscle training, it may improve expiratory muscle strength and sleep quality, but not sleepiness when compared with sham. The evidence on the effects of expiratory muscle training in apnea-hypopnea index is very uncertain.
Topics: Humans; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Breathing Exercises; Respiratory Muscles; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37258418
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13941 -
The association of obstructive sleep apnea and renal outcomes-a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Nephrology Oct 2017The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the association of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with renal outcome. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the association of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with renal outcome.
METHODS
Our study followed the PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers searched for relevant articles in the databases of Pubmed, the Web of Science and CENTRAL, and conducted study selection and quality assessment. A random-effect model was used to estimate the effects.
RESULTS
total of 1240 articles were initially identified (Pubmed = 568, Web of Science = 640, CENTRAL = 32). After removal of duplicate articles (n = 415) and irrelevant articles (n = 788), 37 were selected for full-text review, and 18 were finally included in the analysis. Overall, patients diagnosed with OSA were found to have a higher odds ratio (OR) of a poorer renal outcome, with a pooled OR of 1.77 (95% C.I.: 1.37–2.29). The significant association between OSA and a poorer renal outcome was not affected by the medical condition of diabetes mellitus (DM). In addition, we found that OSA was consistently associated with higher albuminuria/proteinuria and a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), with a pooled OR of 1.84 (95% C.I.: 1.24–2.73) and 1.60 (95% C.I.: 1.19–2.16), respectively. A greater OSA severity was also found to be related to a higher OR, with a mild group OR of 1.45 (95% C.I.: 1.19–1.77) and a moderate and severe group OR of 2.39 (95% C.I.: 1.96–2.90).
CONCLUSIONS
Our study demonstrated that OSA is significantly associated with poorer renal function.
Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Risk Factors; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 29037156
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-017-0731-2 -
Current Problems in Cardiology Jan 2024The association between untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is well known. In this literature review, we aim to review the existing... (Review)
Review
The association between untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is well known. In this literature review, we aim to review the existing literature on treatment effects of OSA and its impact on CVD morbidity and mortality, stratified by gender. We systematically reviewed PubMed, Medline, and Scopus per PRISMA guidelines and included 25 studies in the final review. Primary outcomes were CVD-associated morbidity and mortality. Out of 25 studies, 10 were meta-analysis, 8 observational, and 7 randomized controlled trials. The treatment modality was continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in 23 studies, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, and oral appliance therapy in 2. Secondary prevention of CVD was the endpoint in 23 studies. A total of 165,775 participants between 45 and 75 years of age, 60%-90% males, and the average Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score was 5-9. CV outcomes included myocardial infarction, angina, heart failure (HF), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), coronary artery disease (CAD), ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation (AF), and hypertension. In 4 studies, CPAP was associated with a reduction in CVD mortality, and 10 studies showed improvement in morbidity. Our review of literature did not show consistent benefits in CV outcomes in OSA patients. We identified many potential research areas, especially the lack of studies demonstrating dose-dependent effect of OSA treatment on CV outcomes, especially when stratified by severity of OSA and gender. Larger prospective studies with longer follow-up will be helpful to study these parameters.
Topics: Female; Humans; Male; Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Artery Disease; Morbidity; Prospective Studies; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
PubMed: 37863463
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.102139 -
BMC Pediatrics Jan 2024Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is broadly recognized to be associated with neurobehavioral deficits, which have significant impacts on developing-aged children and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is broadly recognized to be associated with neurobehavioral deficits, which have significant impacts on developing-aged children and adolescents. Therefore, our study aimed to quantify the proportion of neurobehavioral impairments attributed to SDB in general children and adolescents by population attributable fraction (PAF).
METHODS
The study was registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023388143). We collected two types of literature on the prevalence of SDB and the risk of SDB-related neurobehavioral deficits from ten electronic databases and registers, respectively. The pooled effect sizes (P, P, RR) by random-effects meta-analysis were separately substituted into Levin's formula and Miettinen's formula to calculate PAFs.
RESULTS
Three prevalence literature and 2 risk literature, all with moderate/high quality, were included in the quantitative analysis individually. The prevalence of SDB was 11% (95%CI 2%-20%) in children and adolescents (P), while the SDB prevalence was 25% (95%CI 7%-42%) in neurobehavioral patients (P). SDB diagnosis at baseline was probably associated with about threefold subsequent incidence of neurobehavioral deficits (pooled RR 3.24, 95%CI 1.25-8.41), after multi-adjustment for key confounders. Up to 19.8% or 17.3% of neurobehavioral consequences may be attributed to SDB from Levin's formula and Miettinen's formula, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
A certain number of neurobehavioral consequences may be attributable to SDB. It is essential for clinicians to identify and treat SDB timely, as well as screen for SDB in patients with neurobehavioral impairments. More longitudinal studies of SDB and neurobehavioral deficits are needed in the future to further certify the association between them.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Humans; Incidence; Prevalence; Sleep Apnea Syndromes
PubMed: 38245707
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-023-04511-2 -
Graefe's Archive For Clinical and... Jun 2023Lax eyelid condition (LEC) and floppy eyelid syndrome (FES) represent two distinct conditions which have been associated with several ocular and systemic comorbidities.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Lax eyelid condition (LEC) and floppy eyelid syndrome (FES) represent two distinct conditions which have been associated with several ocular and systemic comorbidities. The main aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore the available literature to estimate the prevalence rate of LEC and FES in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
METHODS
The protocol of this systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered in PROSPERO. Four electronic databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Web of Science) were searched from inception to December 24, 2021. A random intercept logistic regression model was carried out for the analysis of overall proportions. Odds ratio and mean difference were reported as measures of the effect size in the presence of binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. The estimated numbers of LEC/FES patients in OSA were calculated by multiplying the prevalence rate determined by our random-effects model and the corresponding Benjafield et al.'s population prospect.
RESULTS
We included 11 studies comprising 1225 OSA patients of whom 431 and 153 affected by LEC and FES, respectively. Our model estimated a pooled prevalence rate for LEC and FES in OSA patients of 40.2% (95%CI: 28.6-53.1%) and of 22.4% (95%CI: 13.8-34.2%), respectively. The number of LEC/FES affected individuals among OSA patients is expected to peak up to 376 and to 210 million, respectively. OSA patients appeared to have a 3.4 (95%CI: 2.2-5.2) and a 3.0 (95%CI: 1.7-5.5) increased risk of developing LEC and FES than the healthy counterpart.
CONCLUSION
Prevalence of LEC and FES is higher in OSA-affected patients compared to controls. More studies are warranted to investigate the mechanisms leading to the development of LEC and/or FES in OSA patients, as well as the feasibility of the adoption of these clinical findings as screening tools for OSA.
Topics: Humans; Prevalence; Syndrome; Eyelid Diseases; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Eyelids
PubMed: 36380123
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05890-5 -
Otolaryngology--head and Neck Surgery :... Aug 2023To evaluate the associations between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the associations between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy on SNHL.
DATA SOURCES
Ovid Medline, Embase, and Scopus databases.
REVIEW METHODS
A systematic search was done for studies investigating relationships between OSA and SNHL in adults, with manual searches for additional references. The final update was done on December 22, 2021. The Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies was applied for quality assessments.
RESULTS
The 20 included studies had a total of 34,442 participants (66% male; mean age, 46.6 years). The OSA group had a significantly worse mean hearing threshold level (HTL) than the control group for midfrequency ranges (500, 1000, 2000 Hz; mean difference, 4.00 dB; 95% CI, 2.40-5.61) and high-frequency ranges (4000, 8000 Hz; mean difference, 6.24 dB; 95% CI, 2.99-9.49). An association between OSA and SNHL was found. When compared with controls, patients with OSA had an odds ratio of 1.52 (95% CI, 1.12-2.06) for midfrequency hearing impairment and 1.19 (95% CI, 1.05-1.34) for high-frequency hearing impairment. However, we did not find significant improvements in midfrequency HTL after CPAP therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
HTL was significantly poorer among participants with OSA (especially in severe cases) than non-OSA controls. Studies on patients with OSA with SNHL treated with CPAP did not show significant improvements in midfrequency HTL. Further studies are warranted on these issues.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Female; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Bias; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural; Hearing Loss
PubMed: 36040818
DOI: 10.1177/01945998221120777 -
Survey of Ophthalmology 2023Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) has been linked to various ocular disorders, including floppy eyelid syndrome (FES). Previous studies have hypothesised the underlying... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
RATIONALE
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) has been linked to various ocular disorders, including floppy eyelid syndrome (FES). Previous studies have hypothesised the underlying association between the 2 , but results are currently still inconclusive.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the association between OSA and FES.
METHODS
Four databases (Pubmed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched from inception until 28 February 2022 for observational studies and randomized controlled trials assessing the association between OSA and FES. Two reviewers selected studies, extracted data, graded the risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the quality of assessment using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Random-effects models were used to metaanalyze the associations.
RESULTS
Twelve studies were included in the systematic review, of which nine were suitable for metaanalysis, with a combined cohort of 1,109 patients. Risk of bias was low to moderate. The overall analysis showed a significant positive association between OSA and FES (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.27-2.83, I 2 = 44%). Further analysis revealed that the more severe the OSA was, the higher the risk of developing FES. Patients with severe OSA had the nominally highest risk of developing FES (OR = 3.06, 95% CI = 1.62-5.78, I 2 = 0%), followed by moderate OSA (OR = 2.53, 95% CI = 1.29-4.97, I 2 = 0%), and patients with mild OSA had the lowest risk (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 0.85-3.62, I 2 = 0%).
CONCLUSION
Our metaanalysis reports a positive association between OSA and FES, with increasing severity of OSA correlating with a significantly higher risk of FES. More longitudinal studies with sufficient duration of follow-up are needed to better characterise the relationship between OSA and FES.
Topics: Humans; Syndrome; Eyelid Diseases; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Eyelids
PubMed: 36427560
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.11.006