-
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery &... Nov 2017In spite of improvements in implant designs and surgical precision, functional outcomes of mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (MA TKA) have plateaued. This... (Review)
Review
In spite of improvements in implant designs and surgical precision, functional outcomes of mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty (MA TKA) have plateaued. This suggests probable technical intrinsic limitations that few alternate more anatomical recently promoted surgical techniques are trying to solve. This review aims at (1) classifying the different options to frontally align TKA implants, (2) at comparing their safety and efficacy with the one from MA TKAs, therefore answering the following questions: does alternative techniques to position TKA improve functional outcomes of TKA (question 1)? Is there any pathoanatomy not suitable for kinematic implantation of a TKA (question 2)? A systematic review of the existing literature utilizing PubMed and Google Scholar search engines was performed in February 2017. Only studies published in peer-reviewed journals over the last ten years in either English or French were reviewed. We identified 569 reports, of which 13 met our eligibility criteria. Four alternative techniques to position a TKA are challenging the traditional MA technique: anatomic (AA), adjusted mechanical (aMA), kinematic (KA), and restricted kinematic (rKA) alignment techniques. Regarding osteoarthritic patients with slight to mid constitutional knee frontal deformity, the KA technique enables a faster recovery and generally generates higher functional TKA outcomes than the MA technique. Kinematic alignment for TKA is a new attractive technique for TKA at early to mid-term, but need longer follow-up in order to assess its true value. It is probable that some forms of pathoanatomy might affect longer-term clinical outcomes of KA TKA and make the rKA technique or additional surgical corrections (realignment osteotomy, retinacular ligament reconstruction etc.) relevant for this sub-group of patients. Longer follow-up is needed to define the best indication of each alternative surgical technique for TKA. Level I for question 1 (systematic review of Level I studies), level 4 for question 2.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Biomechanical Phenomena; Humans; Knee Joint; Knee Prosthesis
PubMed: 28864235
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.07.010 -
European Journal of Physical and... Dec 2013Early multidisciplinary rehabilitation can improve the recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, optimal exercise therapy has not been defined. We aimed to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Early multidisciplinary rehabilitation can improve the recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, optimal exercise therapy has not been defined. We aimed to answer the question: "Which type and/or timing of exercise therapy is effective following THA?"
DESIGN
Systematic review.
METHODS
We searched four databases: MEDLINE, PEDro, Cochrane Library, and Cinahl since January 2008 till December 2012. Literature before 2008 was not searched for, because it was previously analyzed by two systematic reviews. Eligible criteria for studies were: Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs); English language; interventions on type and/or timing of physical exercise initiating after THA; outcome measures including at least one among impairment, activity, participation, quality of life, or length of stay in hospital.
RESULTS
Eleven papers on nine RCTs were identified. Trial quality was mixed. PEDro scores ranged from four to eight. Exercise therapy varied greatly in type and timing. Each of the nine RCTs addressed a specific issue and overall the results were sparse. In the early postoperative phase favorable outcomes were due to ergometer cycling and maximal strength training. Inconclusive results were reported for aquatic exercises, bed exercises without external resistance or without its progressive increase according to the overload principle, and timing. In the late postoperative phase (> 8 weeks postoperatively) advantages were due to weight-bearing exercises.
CONCLUSION
Insufficient evidence exists to build up a detailed evidence-based exercise protocol after THA. Sparse results from few RCTs support specific exercise types which should be added to the usual mobility training in THA patients.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Databases, Bibliographic; Exercise Therapy; Hip Prosthesis; Humans; Hydrotherapy; Osteoarthritis, Hip; Patient Satisfaction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Resistance Training
PubMed: 24172644
DOI: No ID Found -
The Bone & Joint Journal May 2021This systematic review asked which patterns of complications are associated with the three reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) prosthetic designs, as classified... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
This systematic review asked which patterns of complications are associated with the three reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) prosthetic designs, as classified by Routman et al, in patients undergoing RTSA for the management of cuff tear arthropathy, massive cuff tear, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis. The three implant design philosophies investigated were medial glenoid/medial humerus (MGMH), medial glenoid/lateral humerus (MGLH), and lateral glenoid/medial humerus (LGMH).
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was performed via a search of MEDLINE and Embase. Two reviewers extracted data on complication occurrence and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Meta-analysis was conducted on the reported proportion of complications, weighted by sample size, and PROMs were pooled using the reported standardized mean difference (SMD). Quality of methodology was assessed using Wylde's non-summative four-point system. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020193041).
RESULTS
A total of 42 studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Rates of scapular notching were found to be significantly higher in MGMH implants (52% (95% confidence interval (CI) 40 to 63)) compared with MGLH ((18% (95% CI 6 to 34)) and LGMH (12% (95% CI 3 to 26)). Higher rates of glenoid loosening were seen in MGMH implants (6% (95% CI 3 to 10)) than in MGLH implants (0% (95% CI 0 to 2)). However, strength of evidence for this finding was low. No significant differences were identified in any other complication, and there were no significant differences observed in PROMs between implant philosophies.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review has found significant improvement in PROMS and low complication rates across the implant philosophies studied. Scapular notching was the only complication found definitely to have significantly higher prevalence with the MGMH implant design. Cite this article: 2021;103-B(5):813-821.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder; Humans; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Shoulder Prosthesis
PubMed: 33616421
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B.BJJ-2020-2101 -
The Journal of Hand Surgery... Oct 2023Literature investigating the long-term outcomes of prosthesis options for proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty is scarce, with most reports combining... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Literature investigating the long-term outcomes of prosthesis options for proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty is scarce, with most reports combining indications and underlying pathologies in analyses. In this study, we aim to compare silicone, pyrocarbon and metal prostheses in PIP joint arthroplasty for primary degenerative osteoarthritis (OA). A review of scientific literature published between 1990 and 2021 was conducted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. Relevant studies were screened and the appropriate data was extracted. An evaluation of clinical outcomes (range of motion [ROM] and pain), complications (reoperation) and survival rates for each prosthesis was performed. Twelve studies were included for analysis with a total of 412 PIP joints. ROM was 66.6°, 55.8° and 46.4° for metal, silicone and pyrocarbon implants, respectively. Silicone implants had the best pain score on the visual analogue scale (1.2) followed by the pyrocarbon (2.6) and metal (3.9) groups. Complication rates were lowest in silicone implants (11.3%) compared to 18.5% in pyrocarbon and 22.4% in metal prostheses. Survival did not differ significantly amongst the three groups. Our findings suggest that for patients with primary degenerative OA, PIP joint arthroplasty using a silicone prosthesis can provide greater pain relief with lower complication rates compared to other implant options. Level III (Therapeutic).
Topics: Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Finger Joint; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger; Osteoarthritis; Arthroplasty; Silicones; Pain
PubMed: 37881822
DOI: 10.1142/S2424835523500571 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Nov 2016This systematic review gives an overview of guidelines and original publications as well as the evidence on which the currently proposed indication criteria are based.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This systematic review gives an overview of guidelines and original publications as well as the evidence on which the currently proposed indication criteria are based. Until now such a state-of-the-science overview was lacking.
METHODS
Websites of orthopaedic and arthritis organizations (English/Dutch language) were independently searched by two authors for THA/TKA guidelines for OA. Furthermore, a systematic search strategy in several databases through August 2014 was performed. Quality of the guidelines was assessed with the AGREE II instrument, which consists of 6 domains (maximum summed score of 6 indicating high quality). Also, the level of evidence of all included studies was assessed.
RESULTS
We found 6 guidelines and 18 papers, out of 3065 references. The quality of the guidelines summed across 6 domains ranged from 0.46 to 4.78. In total, 12 THA, 10 TKA and 2 THA/TKA indication sets were found. Four studies stated that no evidence-based indication criteria are available. Indication criteria concerning THA/TKA consisted of the following domains: pain (in respectively 11 and 10 sets), function (12 and 7 sets), radiological changes (10 and 9 sets), failed conservative therapy (8 and 4 sets) and other indications (6 and 7 sets). Specific cut-off values or ranges were often not stated and the level of evidence was low.
CONCLUSION
The indication criteria for THA/TKA are based on limited evidence. Empirical research is needed, especially regarding domain specific cut-off values or ranges at which the best postoperative outcomes are achieved for patients, taking into account the limited lifespan of a prosthesis.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Female; Hip Prosthesis; Humans; Knee Prosthesis; Male; Middle Aged; Osteoarthritis, Hip; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Pain Management; Pain Measurement; Patient Selection; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Radiography; Reoperation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27829422
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-016-1325-z -
Surgical Infections Sep 2022To evaluate systematically the failure rate of short versus long courses of antibiotic agents for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
To evaluate systematically the failure rate of short versus long courses of antibiotic agents for prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for controlled studies of short- and long-course antibiotic agents for joint prosthesis infections, all from the time of database creation to April 2022. Literature search, quality evaluation, and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers, and the primary outcome was the rate of surgical failure after antibiotic treatment. Stata 11.0 software was then applied for meta-analysis. Publication bias was assessed using Begg test. Heterogeneity was assessed using the test, and fixed or random effects models were used accordingly. Meta-regression was used to determine the causes of heterogeneity. A total of 14 articles involving 1,971 participants met the inclusion criteria, including 12 observational studies and two randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis showed no difference between short and long courses of antibiotic agents (relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-1.32). The results of the subgroup analysis showed no differences between the failure rates of patients with PJI treated with short and long courses of antibiotic agents in studies with different study areas, different treatment modalities, and different locations of the artificial joints. Patients with PJIs may not require long-term or lifelong antibiotic agents after surgical treatment, and short-term (four to six weeks) antibiotic therapy is usually safe.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Arthritis, Infectious; Arthroplasty, Replacement; Humans; Joint Prosthesis
PubMed: 35950957
DOI: 10.1089/sur.2022.157 -
International Journal of Oral and... Jan 2017The aim of the present study was to determine which prosthesis has resulted in the best outcomes after total temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR). A comprehensive... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The aim of the present study was to determine which prosthesis has resulted in the best outcomes after total temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR). A comprehensive electronic search was undertaken in September 2015. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies that described one of the three current TMJR systems and that had pre- and postoperative data on at least two of the following TMJR indications: pain, diet, function, and maximum inter-incisal opening (MIO). Sixteen papers were included in the systematic review, reporting 10 retrospective studies and six prospective studies (no randomized controlled or case-controlled trials). A total 312 patients with 505 TMJ Concepts prostheses, 728 patients with 1048 Biomet prostheses, and 125 patients with 196 Nexus prostheses were included in the analysis. There was no real difference between the various TMJR systems in terms of pain or diet scores. Function scores improved with the TMJ Concepts, but this was the only prosthesis for which data were available. Biomet prostheses appeared to have a greater increase in MIO mean gain compared to TMJ Concepts and Nexus prostheses; however this was heavily biased by one study. Without this study, there was no real difference in MIO. It is concluded that the prostheses are similar, but most data are available for the TMJ Concepts prosthesis, with results being favourable.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement; Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Prosthesis Design; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
PubMed: 27644588
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.08.022 -
International Journal of Oral and... Aug 2022The aim of this study was to evaluate the revision rate after total alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) and determine whether there is a higher risk... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The aim of this study was to evaluate the revision rate after total alloplastic temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) and determine whether there is a higher risk of revision surgery with stock or custom-fitted prostheses (the two most current TMJR prosthesis types). A systematic review was performed, with a search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library in November 2020. Overall, 27 articles were included in this study, describing Biomet and TMJ Concepts prostheses and including postoperative data on complications requiring a return to the operating room. A total of 2247 prostheses were analysed: 1350 stock Biomet prostheses and 897 custom-fitted TMJ Concepts and custom-fitted Biomet prostheses. The global revision rate was 1.19 per 100 prosthesis-years. The most common reason for revision was heterotopic bone formation. Stock prostheses appeared to have a lower risk of revision compared to custom prostheses: rate ratio 0.52 (95% confidence interval 0.33-0.81, P-value 0.003). Regarding causes of revision, the only significant difference between the types of devices was a higher rate of heterotopic bone formation for custom-made prostheses (P = 0.001). The results of this study revealed a low revision rate post TMJR revision, with stock devices even less prone to such risk. Nevertheless, these results can be explained by the fact that custom-made prostheses are more likely to be used for cases in which the anatomy is significantly abnormal or there is a history of multiple joint surgeries, which carry a greater risk of complications and heterotopic bone formation.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement; Cimetidine; Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Ossification, Heterotopic; Temporomandibular Joint; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
PubMed: 35012826
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.12.012 -
Foot & Ankle International Dec 2023The increasing number of total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) has led to growing evidence on the risk factors for complications after surgery. However, the role of obesity... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The increasing number of total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) has led to growing evidence on the risk factors for complications after surgery. However, the role of obesity in this patient group has been the subject of much debate. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to investigate the evidence for untoward effects of obesity following TAA.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive search on April 28, 2023, in MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase, and CENTRAL. Eligible observational studies reported on the short- and long-term outcomes of primary TAA, comparing patients with and without obesity (defined as body mass index > 30). Using a random effects model, we calculated pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from 2 by 2 tables (event and nonevent in the obese and nonobese primary TAA groups).
RESULTS
Nine studies with 10 388 patients were eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. We found significantly higher odds of revision in the obese group compared to the nonobese group (OR = 1.68, CI: 1.44-1.95). However, the odds of overall perioperative complications (OR = 1.55, CI: 0.50-4.80) and wound complications (OR = 1.34, CI: 0.29-6.20) were nonsignificantly higher in the obese group.
CONCLUSION
Based on our results, obesity may have affected long-term outcomes following TAA and may have negatively affected the prosthesis's survival.
Topics: Humans; Ankle; Reoperation; Obesity; Joint Prosthesis; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle; Ankle Joint; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 37902184
DOI: 10.1177/10711007231201158 -
The Journal of Hand Surgery Jan 2018We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review with the primary objective to determine the overall incidence of radial head prosthesis removal or revision. Our... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review with the primary objective to determine the overall incidence of radial head prosthesis removal or revision. Our secondary objectives addressed the incidence of removal or revision based on the type of prosthesis fixation (cemented, uncemented smooth stem, uncemented press-fit), material (metal, Vitallium, titanium, pyrocarbon), and design (short vs long stem and monopolar vs bipolar), and the reasons for prosthetic removal or revision.
METHODS
We included 30 studies with a total of 1,017 patients out of whom 77 prostheses were removed and 45 prostheses were revised.
RESULTS
The pooled rate of radial head prosthesis removal or revision was 10.0% (95% confidence interval, 7.3%-13.6%) with a mean follow-up of 38 months. Subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of removal/revision was lowest with the cemented fixation, longer-stem, Vitallium material, and bipolar prosthesis. More than half of the prostheses were removed/revised for excision of the heterotopic ossification (47%) and for the treatment of stiffness and limitation of motion (42%). Other reasons recorded were pain (19%), loosening (16%), overstuffing (13%), instability (12%), infection (8%), and prosthesis disassembly (4%).
CONCLUSIONS
The current data show that the highest incidence of removal/revision occurred within 2 years after implantation. There was no major difference in the incidence of removal/revision among different designs and materials. Implant removal was often performed as part of a procedure to manage elbow stiffness and heterotopic ossification at the surgeon's preference, not necessarily because the implant was malfunctioning. It appears that most radial head arthroplasties have an acceptable and comparable mid-term longevity; however, it is unclear whether long-term longevity will differ between devices.
TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Prognostic II.
Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Elbow; Device Removal; Elbow Joint; Elbow Prosthesis; Humans; Joint Instability; Ossification, Heterotopic; Postoperative Complications; Radius Fractures; Reoperation
PubMed: 29054353
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.08.031