-
Annals of Vascular Surgery Apr 2023Spontaneous jugular venous ectasia (SJVE) is characterized by dilation of the internal jugular vein (IJV) and external jugular vein. It is generally considered a benign... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Spontaneous jugular venous ectasia (SJVE) is characterized by dilation of the internal jugular vein (IJV) and external jugular vein. It is generally considered a benign anomaly. There is no accepted categorization for this disorder.
METHODS
We conducted a case series study and a systematic review of available articles on SJVE to understand the main characteristics, clinicopathologic classifications, and therapeutic approaches.
RESULTS
From January 2001 to December 2021, 14 patients in our hospital were analyzed. A total of 110 original articles (295 cases/311 lesions) were included in the systematic review. We proposed a classification and categorized SJVE into 4 main types (type I-IV) plus one (type V) in which the specific ectasia was located around the jugular bulb at the IJV.
CONCLUSIONS
Conservative treatment is preferred for patients with type I (without thrombus) SJVE and asymptomatic patients who can be treated without anticoagulants. The therapeutic efficiency of surgery was high, and the best surgical modalities were chosen according to the type of SJVE.
Topics: Humans; Dilatation, Pathologic; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Diseases; Thrombosis; Subclavian Vein; Jugular Veins
PubMed: 36549477
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.11.023 -
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aug 2022Accurate volume status assessments allow physicians to rapidly implement therapeutic measures in acutely unwell patients. However, existing bedside diagnostic tools are... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Accurate volume status assessments allow physicians to rapidly implement therapeutic measures in acutely unwell patients. However, existing bedside diagnostic tools are often unreliable for assessing intravascular volume. We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science for English language articles without date restrictions on January 20, 2022. Studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of IJV-US for hypovolemia and/or hypervolemia in an acute care setting were screened for inclusion. We included studies using any method of IJV-US assessment as the index test, compared against any reference standard. We fitted hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) models for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy, separately for hypovolemia and hypervolemia. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2. We assessed certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. A total of 26 studies were included, of which 19 studies (956 patients) examined IJV-US for hypovolemia and 13 studies (672 patients) examined IJV-US for hypervolemia. For the diagnosis of hypovolemia, IJV-US had a pooled sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.87; moderate-certainty evidence) and specificity of 0.82 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.88; moderate-certainty evidence). Measurement of IJV collapsibility indices had higher diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 0.85, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.89; specificity 0.78, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.88) than static IJV indices (sensitivity 0.73, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.82; specificity 0.70, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.86). For the diagnosis of hypervolemia, IJV-US had a pooled sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.92; moderate-certainty evidence) and specificity of 0.70 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.82; very low-certainty evidence). IJV-US has moderate sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of hypervolemia and hypovolemia. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the role of IJV-US for guiding therapeutic interventions aimed at optimizing volume status.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Hypovolemia; Jugular Veins; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 35718838
DOI: 10.1007/s11739-022-03003-y -
Paediatric Anaesthesia Dec 2009Central venous catheter placement is technically difficult in pediatric population especially in the younger patients. Ultrasound prelocation and/or guidance (UPG) of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
Central venous catheter placement is technically difficult in pediatric population especially in the younger patients. Ultrasound prelocation and/or guidance (UPG) of internal jugular vein (IJV) access has been shown to decrease failure rate and complications related to this invasive procedure. The goal of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the advantages of UPG over anatomical landmarks (AL) during IJV access in children and infants.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify clinical trials that focused on the comparison of UPG to AL techniques during IJV access in children and infants. Two reviewers independently assessed each study to meet inclusion criteria and extracted data. Data from each trial were combined to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) or the mean differences (MD), and their 95% confidence intervals [CI 95%]. I(2) statistics were used to assess statistics heterogeneity and to guide the use of fixed or random effect for computation of overall effects. Subgroup analysis was used to clarify the effects of the techniques used (prelocation or guidance) or the experience of practitioners.
RESULTS
Literature found five articles. Most of the patients were cardiac surgery patients. In comparison with AL, UPG had no effect on IJV access failure rate (OR = 0.28 [0.05, 1.47], I(2) = 75%, P = 0.003), the rate of carotid artery puncture (OR = 0.32 [0.06, 1.62], I(2) = 68%, P = 0.01), haematoma, haemothorax, or pneumothorax occurrence (OR = 0.40 [0.14, 1.13], I(2) = 17%, P = 0.30, OR = 0.72, OR = 0.81 [0.18, 3.73], I(2) = 0%, P = 0.94, respectively) and time to IJV access and haemothorax/pneumothorax occurrence. Subgroup analysis found an efficacy of ultrasound when used by novice operators or during intraoperative use.
DISCUSSION
This current meta-analysis does not found the utility of ultrasound during IJV access in children and infants in increasing the success rate and in decreasing complications.
Topics: Carotid Artery Injuries; Catheterization, Central Venous; Child; Child, Preschool; Hematoma; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Jugular Veins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Ultrasonography, Interventional
PubMed: 19863734
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03171.x -
JA Clinical Reports Sep 2022Thyrocervical trunk rupture is an unusual, but critical, complication associated with central venous catheter (CVC) placement. The management of this complication has...
BACKGROUND
Thyrocervical trunk rupture is an unusual, but critical, complication associated with central venous catheter (CVC) placement. The management of this complication has not been fully determined because it is rare.
CASE PRESENTATION
A 53-year-old Japanese woman with anorexia nervosa developed refractory ventricular fibrillation. After returning spontaneous circulation, a CVC was successfully placed at the initial attempt in the right internal jugular vein using real-time ultrasound guidance. Immediately after CVC placement, she developed enlarging swelling around the neck. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography showed massive contrast media extravasation around the neck and mediastinum. Brachiocephalic artery angiography showed a "blush" appearance of the ruptured right thyrocervical trunk. After selective arterial embolization with 33% N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, the extravasation completely disappeared and hemostasis was achieved.
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest that severe vascular complications arising from CVC placement can occur in patients with a fragile physiological state. Endovascular embolization is an effective treatment for such complications.
PubMed: 36109440
DOI: 10.1186/s40981-022-00565-w -
Critical Care Medicine Aug 2012Catheter-related bloodstream infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Current guidelines recommend that femoral venous... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with femoral venous catheters as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheters: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Catheter-related bloodstream infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Current guidelines recommend that femoral venous access should be avoided to reduce this complication (1A recommendation). However, the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections from femoral as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheterization has not been systematically reviewed.
OBJECTIVE
A systematic review of the literature to determine the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections related to nontunneled central venous catheters inserted at the femoral site as compared to subclavian and internal jugular placement.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, citation review of relevant primary and review articles, and an Internet search (Google).
STUDY SELECTION
Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies that reported the frequency of catheter-related bloodstream infections (infections per 1,000 catheter days) in patients with nontunneled central venous catheters placed in the femoral site as compared to subclavian or internal jugular placement.
DATA EXTRACTION
Data were abstracted on study design, study size, study setting, patient population, number of catheters at each insertion site, number of catheter-related bloodstream infections, and the prevalence of deep venous thrombosis. Studies were subgrouped according to study design (cohort and randomized controlled trials). Meta-analytic techniques were used to summarize the data.
DATA SYNTHESIS
Two randomized controlled trials (1006 catheters) and 8 cohort (16,370 catheters) studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Three thousand two hundred thirty catheters were placed in the subclavian vein, 10,958 in the internal jugular and 3,188 in the femoral vein for a total of 113,652 catheter days. The average catheter-related bloodstream infections density was 2.5 per 1,000 catheter days (range 0.6-7.2). There was no significant difference in the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections between the femoral and subclavian/internal jugular sites in the two randomized controlled trials (i.e., no level 1A evidence). There was no significant difference in the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections between the femoral and subclavian sites. The internal jugular site was associated with a significantly lower risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections compared to the femoral site (risk ratio 1.90; 95% confidence interval 1.21-2.97, p=.005, I²=35%). This difference was explained by two of the studies that were statistical outliers. When these two studies were removed from the analysis there was no significant difference in the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections between the femoral and internal jugular sites (risk ratio 1.35; 95% confidence interval 0.84-2.19, p=0.2, I=0%). Meta-regression demonstrated a significant interaction between the risk of infection and the year of publication (p=.01), with the femoral site demonstrating a higher risk of infection in the earlier studies. There was no significant difference in the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection between the subclavian and internal jugular sites. The risk of deep venous thrombosis was assessed in the two randomized controlled trials. A meta-analysis of this data demonstrates that there was no difference in the risk of deep venous thrombosis when the femoral site was compared to the subclavian and internal jugular sites combined. There was, however, significant heterogeneity between studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Although earlier studies showed a lower risk of catheter-related bloodstream infections when the internal jugular was compared to the femoral site, recent studies show no difference in the rate of catheter-related bloodstream infections between the three sites.
Topics: Catheter-Related Infections; Catheters, Indwelling; Femoral Vein; Humans; Jugular Veins; Risk Factors; Sepsis; Subclavian Vein
PubMed: 22809915
DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318255d9bc -
Surgical Neurology International 2019Internal jugular phlebectasia (IJP), the abnormal dilatation of internal jugular vein, is generally considered a benign anomaly. However, because IJP is uncommon, little... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Internal jugular phlebectasia (IJP), the abnormal dilatation of internal jugular vein, is generally considered a benign anomaly. However, because IJP is uncommon, little is known about its natural history, and currently, no consensus on the best treatment modality is available.
METHODS
The purpose of this article is to conduct a systematic review of available literature on recently reported IJP cases to understand the main characteristics of IJP and its most frequent therapeutic approaches. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, literature search for IJP cases was conducted in the COCHRANE, PUBMED, EBSCOHOST, SCOPUS, OVID, and SCIELO databases.
RESULTS
A total of 97 original articles were found, with a total of 247 IJP cases reported including both pediatric and adult patients.
CONCLUSIONS
To the best of our knowledge, this study is the largest systematic review analyzing all the reported cases of IJP. IJP is considered by most authors as a benign abnormality that predominantly affects the right jugular vein. It is most commonly diagnosed in children. At present, conservative treatment is preferred for pediatric but not for adult patients. Multicenter randomized prospective studies are required to further understand this rare anomaly.
PubMed: 31528444
DOI: 10.25259/SNI-217-2019 -
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma,... Dec 2013Cervical immobilisation is commonly applied following trauma, particularly blunt head injury, but current methods of immobilisation are associated with significant... (Review)
Review
Cervical immobilisation is commonly applied following trauma, particularly blunt head injury, but current methods of immobilisation are associated with significant complications. Semi-rigid disposable cervical collars are known to cause pressure ulcers, and impede effective airway management. These collars may also exacerbate a head injury by increasing intracranial pressure as a result of external compression of the jugular veins. There is a clear imperative to find ways of effectively immobilising the cervical spine whilst minimising complications, and any assessment of existing or new devices should include a standardized approach to the measurement of tissue interface pressures and their effect on jugular venous drainage from the brain. This systematic review summarises the research methods and technologies that have been used to measure tissue interface pressure and assess the jugular vein in the context of cervical immobilisation devices. 27 papers were included and assessed for quality. Laboratory investigations and biomechanical studies have gradually given way to methods that more accurately reflect clinical care. There are numerous accounts of skin ulceration associated with cervical collars, but no standardised approach to measuring tissue interface pressure. It is therefore difficult to compare studies and devices, but a pressure of less than 30 mmHg appears desirable. Cervical collars have been shown to have a compressive effect on the jugular veins, but it is not yet certain that this is the cause of the increased intracranial pressure observed in association with cervical collar use. This is the first review of its type. It will help guide further research in this area of trauma care, and the development and testing of new cervical immobilisation devices.
Topics: Airway Management; Cervical Vertebrae; Humans; Immobilization; Jugular Veins; Pressure; Regional Blood Flow
PubMed: 24299024
DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-81 -
The Journal of Vascular Access Mar 2020Comparison between various approaches of ultrasound (USG)-guided internal jugular vein cannulation, that is, short-axis out-of-plane approach, long-axis in-plane... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Comparison between various approaches of ultrasound (USG)-guided internal jugular vein cannulation, that is, short-axis out-of-plane approach, long-axis in-plane approach, and oblique-axis approach, is sparse. In this network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, all three approaches were evaluated to identify the best technique for USG-guided internal jugular vein cannulation.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials comparing short-axis out-of-plane approach, long-axis in-plane approach, and oblique-axis approach in any combination (i.e. comparison of any two or all three) for USG-guided internal jugular vein cannulation were included in this meta-analysis. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted with a non-informative prior effect size and heterogeneity, and all results were reported as posterior median odds ratio with 95% credible interval.
RESULTS
Data of 658 patients from five randomized controlled trials were included in this meta-analysis. No difference was obtained in first attempt success rate of cannulation in three approaches (posterior median odds ratio between long-axis and short-axis view, oblique-axis and short-axis view, and long-axis and oblique-axis view were 0.67 (0.20, 2.08), 0.92 (0.09, 4.790), and 1.3420 (0.1680, 6.7820), respectively). No difference was seen in the incidence of carotid artery puncture and overall success rate of cannulation.
CONCLUSION
All three commonly used approaches for USG-guided internal jugular vein cannulation, that is, short axis, long axis, and oblique axis, are comparable in terms of clinical utility and safety. There is insufficient evidence to recommend one approach over another for this purpose.
Topics: Catheterization, Central Venous; Humans; Jugular Veins; Network Meta-Analysis; Punctures; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Ultrasonography, Interventional
PubMed: 31423893
DOI: 10.1177/1129729819868927 -
JACC. Cardiovascular Interventions Jul 2017The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) in right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduits and valves, comparing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to systematically evaluate the incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) in right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduits and valves, comparing bovine jugular vein (BJV) valves with all others.
BACKGROUND
Recent evidence suggests that the incidence of IE is higher in patients with congenital heart disease who have undergone implantation of BJV valves in the pulmonary position compared with other valves.
METHODS
Systematic searches of published research were conducted using electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL) and citations cross-referenced current to April 2016. Included studies met the following criteria: patients had undergone right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduit or percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation, and investigators reported on the type of conduit or valve implanted, method of intervention (surgery or catheter based), IE incidence, and follow-up time.
RESULTS
Fifty studies (Levels of Evidence: 2 to 4) were identified involving 7,063 patients. The median cumulative incidence of IE was higher for BJV compared with other valves (5.4% vs. 1.2%; p < 0.0001) during a median follow-up period of 24.0 and 35.5 months, respectively (p = 0.03). For patients with BJV valves, the incidence of IE was not different between surgical and catheter-based valve implantation (p = 0.83).
CONCLUSIONS
There was a higher incidence of endocarditis with BJV valves than other types of right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduits. There was no difference in the incidence of endocarditis between catheter-based bovine valves and surgically implanted bovine valves, suggesting that the substrate for future infection is related to the tissue rather than the method of implantation.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Allografts; Animals; Bioprosthesis; Cattle; Child; Child, Preschool; Endocarditis; Female; Heart Defects, Congenital; Heart Valve Prosthesis; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Heterografts; Humans; Incidence; Infant; Jugular Veins; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Pulmonary Valve; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venous Valves; Young Adult
PubMed: 28728659
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.025 -
The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care... Aug 2014Diagnosis of vascular injury in pediatric trauma is challenging as clinical signs may be masked by physiologic compensation. We aimed to (1) investigate the prevalence... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Diagnosis of vascular injury in pediatric trauma is challenging as clinical signs may be masked by physiologic compensation. We aimed to (1) investigate the prevalence of noniatrogenic pediatric venous injuries, (2) discuss options in management of traumatic venous injury, and (3) investigate mortality from venous injury in pediatric trauma. Our objective was to provide the practicing clinician with a summary of the published literature and to develop an evidence-based guide to the diagnosis and management of traumatic venous injuries in children.
METHODS
A systematic review of published literature (PubMed) describing noniatrogenic traumatic venous injury in the pediatric population (<17 years) was performed according to PRISMA [Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses] guidelines. Data were retrieved systematically under the following headings: Study Design, Population Demographics (dates of recruitment, mean age, mechanism of injury), Diagnostic Approach, Vessel Injured, Management (operative technique), and Mortality.
RESULTS
Thirteen articles were included in this systematic review. In total, 508 noniatrogenic traumatic venous injuries were reported in children between the year 1957 and present day. Mechanisms of injury included blunt trauma from seat belt-related injury and fall from height or penetrating trauma from gunshot and foreign object. Injury to the inferior vena cava was most frequently reported, followed by femoral vein and internal jugular injuries. Primary repair was the most frequently reported technique for surgical repair (38%), followed by ligation (25%) and end-to-end anastomosis (15%). Mortality in pediatric trauma patients who had venous injury was reported as 0% to 67% in published series, highest in the series in which the most frequently reported injury was of the inferior vena cava.
CONCLUSION
Traumatic venous injury in the pediatric population is uncommon but may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Intra-abdominal venous injuries are associated with high mortality from exsanguination. Early diagnosis and intervention are therefore essential in such cases.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Systematic review, level IV.
Topics: Child; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Mortality; Prevalence; Veins
PubMed: 25058265
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000312