-
Acta Oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) Jul 2015In cancer cells, metabolism is shifted to aerobic glycolysis with lactate production coupled with a higher uptake of glucose as the main energy source. Lactate... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
In cancer cells, metabolism is shifted to aerobic glycolysis with lactate production coupled with a higher uptake of glucose as the main energy source. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) catalyzes the reduction of pyruvate to form lactate, and serum level is often raised in aggressive cancer and hematological malignancies. We have assessed the prognostic value of LDH in solid tumors.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A systematic review of electronic databases was conducted to identify publications exploring the association of LDH with clinical outcome in solid tumors. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome, and cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease-free survival (DFS) were secondary outcomes. Data from studies reporting a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled in a meta-analysis. Pooled HRs were computed and weighted using generic inverse-variance and random-effect modeling. All statistical tests were two-sided.
RESULTS
Seventy-six studies comprising 22 882 patients, mainly with advanced disease, were included in the analysis. Median cut-off of serum LDH was 245 U/L. Overall, higher LDH levels were associated with a HR for OS of 1.7 (95% CI 1.62-1.79; p < 0.00001) in 73 studies. The prognostic effect was highest in renal cell, melanoma, gastric, prostate, nasopharyngeal and lung cancers (all p < 0.00001). HRs for PFS was 1.75 (all p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS
A high serum LDH level is associated with a poor survival in solid tumors, in particular melanoma, prostate and renal cell carcinomas, and can be used as a useful and inexpensive prognostic biomarker in metastatic carcinomas.
Topics: Humans; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase; Neoplasms; Prognosis
PubMed: 25984930
DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2015.1043026 -
PloS One 2020The objective of our systematic review is to identify prognostic factors that may be used in decision-making related to the care of patients infected with COVID-19.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE
The objective of our systematic review is to identify prognostic factors that may be used in decision-making related to the care of patients infected with COVID-19.
DATA SOURCES
We conducted highly sensitive searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Embase. The searches covered the period from the inception date of each database until April 28, 2020. No study design, publication status or language restriction were applied.
STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION
We included studies that assessed patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infectious disease and examined one or more prognostic factors for mortality or disease severity. Reviewers working in pairs independently screened studies for eligibility, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We performed meta-analyses and used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each prognostic factor and outcome.
RESULTS
We included 207 studies and found high or moderate certainty that the following 49 variables provide valuable prognostic information on mortality and/or severe disease in patients with COVID-19 infectious disease: Demographic factors (age, male sex, smoking), patient history factors (comorbidities, cerebrovascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, cardiac arrhythmia, arterial hypertension, diabetes, dementia, cancer and dyslipidemia), physical examination factors (respiratory failure, low blood pressure, hypoxemia, tachycardia, dyspnea, anorexia, tachypnea, haemoptysis, abdominal pain, fatigue, fever and myalgia or arthralgia), laboratory factors (high blood procalcitonin, myocardial injury markers, high blood White Blood Cell count (WBC), high blood lactate, low blood platelet count, plasma creatinine increase, high blood D-dimer, high blood lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), high blood C-reactive protein (CRP), decrease in lymphocyte count, high blood aspartate aminotransferase (AST), decrease in blood albumin, high blood interleukin-6 (IL-6), high blood neutrophil count, high blood B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), high blood urea nitrogen (BUN), high blood creatine kinase (CK), high blood bilirubin and high erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)), radiological factors (consolidative infiltrate and pleural effusion) and high SOFA score (sequential organ failure assessment score).
CONCLUSION
Identified prognostic factors can help clinicians and policy makers in tailoring management strategies for patients with COVID-19 infectious disease while researchers can utilise our findings to develop multivariable prognostic models that could eventually facilitate decision-making and improve patient important outcomes.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
Prospero registration number: CRD42020178802. Protocol available at: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.08.20056598v1.
Topics: Aged; Aging; Betacoronavirus; COVID-19; Comorbidity; Coronavirus Infections; Data Management; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Prognosis; Risk Factors; SARS-CoV-2; Socioeconomic Factors
PubMed: 33201896
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241955 -
Clinical Biochemistry Sep 2001To evaluate lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme 1 (LD-1) as a tumor marker of germ cell tumors. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate lactate dehydrogenase isoenzyme 1 (LD-1) as a tumor marker of germ cell tumors.
METHODS
A literature search included a CancerLit and Medline computer search of articles regarding germ cell tumors and LD-1 published between 1963 to 99 and a manual search of reference lists, theses, and textbooks. Forty articles, letters to the editor, and abstracts on testicular germ cell tumors and 10 articles on ovarian germ cell tumors fulfilled inclusion criteria.
RESULTS
Of 696 patients with testicular germ cell tumors, 423 (61%) had a raised serum LD-1 catalytic concentration (S-LD-1). Patients with seminoma have a raised S-LD-1 more often (63%) than those with nonseminoma (60%). S-LD-1 was raised less often in patients with stage I (48%) than in those with stage II (50%) and stage III (67%). S-LD-1, serum alpha fetoprotein concentration (S-AFP), and serum human chorionic gonadotropin concentration (S-hCG) were discordant. S-LD-1 predicted outcome in four studies: one study regarding relapse in patients with nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors stage I, and three studies regarding survival of patients with metastatic testicular germ cell tumors. In two of three studies, S-LD-1 was a better prognostic predictor for patients with metastatic testicular germ cell tumors than S-LD. Of 40 patients with ovarian germ cell tumors, thirty-five (88%) had a raised S-LD-1.
CONCLUSIONS
S-LD-1 is a useful serum tumor marker of testicular germ cell tumors. For patients with ovarian germ cell tumors, S-LD-1 was raised more often than for patients with testicular germ cell tumors. Further studies are required for a general recommendation regarding the use of S-LD-1 for germ cell tumors.
Topics: Biomarkers; Chorionic Gonadotropin; Female; Germinoma; Humans; Isoenzymes; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase; Male; Ovarian Neoplasms; Predictive Value of Tests; Prognosis; Testicular Neoplasms; alpha-Fetoproteins
PubMed: 11676973
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9120(01)00236-3 -
International Journal of Preventive... 2023Research has examined the relationship between salivary lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) screening and prognosis. Due... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Research has examined the relationship between salivary lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) screening and prognosis. Due to biochemical changes in cancer cells and increased production of lactate products in the body. The present systematic review aims to evaluate the changes in salivary LDH levels in HNSCC patients.
METHODS
The present study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. The data were collected by searching PubMed, Science Direct, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from 2000 to 2021. The heterogeneity of the articles was analyzed using I and TAU.
RESULTS
After searching the databases, of 988 articles, 665 duplicated articles were excluded by adopting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. So, 25 articles were primarily selected to be reviewed and evaluated for quality. Finally, 19 articles were selected and analyzed according to the Newcastle-Ottawa checklist. A total of 642 HNSCC patients were reviewed. The meta-analysis showed salivary LDH levels in the HNSCC group were higher than the control group (mean difference = 0.675, standard error = 0.058) ( < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
As the research results showed, a significant correlation was observed between salivary LDH levels and HNSCCs. So, LDH can be employed as a valuable and minimally invasive biomarker in head and neck cancer screening and prevention.
PubMed: 37351035
DOI: 10.4103/ijpvm.ijpvm_452_21 -
BMC Infectious Diseases Mar 2024Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is frequntly accompanied by venous thromboembolism (VTE), and its mechanism may be related to the abnormal inflammation and immune... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is frequntly accompanied by venous thromboembolism (VTE), and its mechanism may be related to the abnormal inflammation and immune status of COVID-19 patients. It has been proved that interleukin-6 (IL-6), ferritin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) may play an important role in the occurrence of VTE in COVID-19 infection. But whether they can server as predictors for VTE in COVID-19 is still unclear. In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare IL-6, ferritin and LDH in VTE and non-VTE COVID-19 patients in order to shed light on the prevention and treatment of VTE.
METHODS
Related literatures were searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANGFANG. COVID-19 patients were divided into VTE group and non-VTE group. Meta-analysis was then conducted to compare levels of IL-6, ferritin and LDH between the two groups.
RESULTS
We finally included and analyzed 17 literatures from January 2019 to October 2022. There was a total of 7,035 COVID-19 patients, with a weighted mean age of 60.01 years. Males accounted for 62.64% and 61.34% patients were in intensive care unit (ICU). Weighted mean difference (WMD) of IL-6, ferritin and LDH was 31.15 (95% CI: 9.82, 52.49), 257.02 (95% CI: 51.70, 462.33) and 41.79 (95% CI: -19.38, 102.96), respectively. The above results indicated that than compared with non-VTE group, VTE group had significantly higher levels of IL-6 and ferritin but similar LDH.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review and meta-analysis pointed out that elevated levels of IL-6 and ferritin were significantly possitive associated with VTE, thus could be used as biological predictive indicators of VTE among COVID-19 patients. However, no association was found between level of LDH and VTE. Therefore, close monitoring of changes in IL-6 and ferritin concentrations is of great value in assisting clinicans to rapidly identify thrombotic complications among COVID-19 patients, hence facilitating the timely effective managment. Further studies are required in terms of the clinical role of cytokines in the occurrence of VTE among COVID-19 infection, with more reliable systematic controls and interventional trials.
Topics: Male; Humans; Middle Aged; COVID-19; Interleukin-6; Venous Thromboembolism; Ferritins; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase
PubMed: 38493138
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09205-3 -
Clinical Genitourinary Cancer Dec 2019The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PC). A systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (PC). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in March 2019 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement. Studies were deemed eligible if they compared patients with PC with high versus low LDH to determine the predictive value of LDH for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS). We performed a formal meta-analysis for both OS and PFS. A total of 59 articles with 14,851 patients were included in the systematic review and 45 studies with 12,224 patients for the qualitative assessment. High LDH was associated with both worse OS (pooled hazard ratio [HR], 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-2.44) and PFS (pooled HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.16). In subgroup analyses of both patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and those with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC), LDH was associated with OS (pooled HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.69-2.42 and pooled HR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.78-2.84, respectively). In patients with CRPC, LDH was associated with OS in those treated with docetaxel systemic chemotherapy and androgen receptor-axis-targeting agents (pooled HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.37-3.00 and pooled HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.25-2.57, respectively). Elevated serum levels of LDH were associated with an increased risk of mortality and progression in patients with metastatic PC. LDH was independently associated with OS in both patients with CRPC and HSPC. LDH could be integrated into prognostic tools that help guide treatment strategy, thereby facilitating the shared decision-making process.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Clinical Decision-Making; Disease Progression; Humans; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase; Male; Mortality; Prognosis; Prostatic Neoplasms; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 31558410
DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.07.009 -
Oncology Research and Treatment 2016The prognostic role of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in urinary system cancer is still controversial. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
The prognostic role of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in urinary system cancer is still controversial. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the prognostic significance of LDH for patients with urinary system cancer.
METHODS
We searched the PubMed, Embase, Springer and CNKI databases for studies published from January 1991 to February 2015 associated with LDH and urinary system cancer. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. After careful review, survival data were extracted from eligible studies. We used pooled hazard ratios (HRs) to estimate the effect of LDH on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS
44 studies meeting the criterion were included. High expression of LDH was significantly correlated with poor OS in urologic cancer (pooled HR 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.81-2.07; p < 0.001). The pooled HRs showed significant difference in PFS between LDH over expression group with LDH low expression group (Pooled HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.61-2.36; p < 0.001) in urologic cancer.
CONCLUSION
High serum LDH is associated with OS and PFS in patients with urinary system cancer, and it is an effective biomarker of prognosis in patients with urologic cancer.
Topics: Aged; Biomarkers, Tumor; Female; Humans; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Prognosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Factors; Sensitivity and Specificity; Survival Analysis; Urologic Neoplasms
PubMed: 27710971
DOI: 10.1159/000449138 -
The Gulf Journal of Oncology Jan 2023The prognosis of head &neck cancer (HNC) depends on its early detection, diagnosis, and treatment, which has advocated a search for a simple, reliable, noninvasive,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The prognosis of head &neck cancer (HNC) depends on its early detection, diagnosis, and treatment, which has advocated a search for a simple, reliable, noninvasive, cost-effective tool to aid in the same. Salivary lactate dehydrogenase has gained interest in recent years, meeting the above requisite.
OBJECTIVES
To evaluate the levels of salivary lactate dehydrogenase in patients with oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD), HNC, and in the healthy control group (CG); to find the correlation, grade-wise and genderwise difference between them; and to assess whether it can be used as a potent biomarker in OPMD and HNC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A comprehensive search of the specialized 14 databases and 4 institutional repositories was performed for including the studies evaluating salivary lactate dehydrogenase in OPMD and HNC patients either comparing or not comparing to the healthy control group in the systematic review process. The meta-analysis was performed with the eligible study data with the STATA version 16, 2019 software with 95% CI and p ≤ 0.05 in the random-effects model.
RESULTS
Twenty-eight studies of case-control, interventional, or uncontrolled non-randomized design evaluating salivary lactate dehydrogenase were included. A total of 2074 subjects were included, involving HNC, OPMD, and CG. The salivary lactate dehydrogenase levels were significantly higher in HNC than in CG & oral leukoplakia (OL) (p=0.00); in OL & oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) than CG (p=0.00); and higher in HNC than OSMF, however not significant (p=0.49). Also, the salivary lactate dehydrogenase levels had no significant difference between males and females in CG, HNC, OL, and OSMF groups(p> 0.05).
DISCUSSION
It is evident that the epithelial transformations in the various OPMD and HNC, and the proceeding necrosis in the case of HNC, raises the LDH levels. It's also worth noting that when degenerative alterations continue, the SaLDH levels rise correspondingly, which are higher in HNC than in OPMD. Hence, it is essential to determine the cut-off values for SaLDH for establishing that the patient may have HNC or OPMD. It would be easy to follow-up frequently and perform investigations such as biopsy for the cases with high SaLDH levels, thereby aiding in the early detection and improving the prognosis of HNC. Moreover, the increased SaLDH levels were indicative of a lower degree of differentiation and an advanced disease leading to a poor prognosis. Salivary sample collection is less invasive, simple, and more acceptable to the patient; however, saliva collection is a time-consuming procedure as it is mostly collected by the passive spit method. Also, it is more feasible to repeat the SaLDH analysis during the follow-up, but the method has recently gained interest for over a decade.
CONCLUSION
Salivary lactate dehydrogenase can be a potential biomarker for the screening, early detection, and follow-up of OPMD or HNC being simple, noninvasive, cost-effective, and readily acceptable modality. However, more studies with new standardized protocols are recommended to determine the precise cut-off levels for HNC and OPMD. Keywords (MeSH): L-Lactate dehydrogenase; Saliva; Mouth Neoplasms; Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck; Oral; Precancerous conditions.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase; Biomarkers; Mouth Neoplasms; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Leukoplakia, Oral; Precancerous Conditions; Oral Submucous Fibrosis
PubMed: 36804163
DOI: No ID Found -
Frontiers in Oncology 2020To investigate the potential prognostic role of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) using the method of systematic review and...
To investigate the potential prognostic role of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) using the method of systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for eligible studies up to February 2020. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to estimate the relationship. A total of 14 studies including 4,009 patients with UC were incorporated. The results showed that a high pretreatment serum LDH was associated with an inferior overall survival (OS, HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.39-1.87, < 0.001), cancer-specific survival (CSS, HR 1.41, 95% CI 1.05-1.90, = 0.022), and disease-free survival (DFS, HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.04-2.59, = 0.034) in UC. Subgroup analyses identified that a high pretreatment serum LDH was associated with a poor OS (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.02-3.81, = 0.042) and DFS (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.04-2.59, = 0.034) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma, a short OS (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.37-2.15, < 0.001) in urothelial carcinoma of bladder. Our findings indicated that a high level of pretreatment serum LDH was associated with inferior OS, CSS, and DFS in patients with UC. This biomarker can be an important factor incorporated into the prognostic models for UC.
PubMed: 32509573
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00677 -
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer... Aug 2022Oral cancer is often preceded by Potentially Malignant Disorders (PMDs) and important role of biochemical markers for early diagnosis has been well documented; however,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Oral cancer is often preceded by Potentially Malignant Disorders (PMDs) and important role of biochemical markers for early diagnosis has been well documented; however, there is limited evidence of Serum lactate dehydrogenase (SLDH) as an effective biochemical marker in diagnosis of PMDs. The present meta-analysis was conducted to assess if serum LDH can be a used as standard biomarker for PMDs and consequently aid in diagnosis of oral cancer.
METHODS
A comprehensive search was conducted in Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO host, Cochrane databases and Google Scholar for studies evaluating estimation of SLDH in PMDs. Search strategy included all types of studies evaluating level of SLDH in patients with PMDs. PRISMA guidelines were followed for the meta-analysis. Fixed-effects model was used to assess the mean differences in SLDH levels between healthy controls and PMDs.
RESULTS
A total number of nine studies were included in meta-analysis after screening for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Potentially malignant disorder was significantly associated with increased serum LDH level compared to healthy controls (pooled SMD: 1.83 (95% CI, 1.52, 2.15) (P < 0.00001; Subgroup analysis of OSMF (Oral Submucous Fibrosis) studies showed significant association with increased serum LDH level compared to healthy controls (pooled SMD: 2.57 (95% CI, 2.16, 2.98; P < 0.00001). Sensitivity analysis for the five studies reflected a significant reduction in I2 values to 24 % (P=0.26). Funnel plots were derived for any evidence of publication bias among the studies.
CONCLUSION
Meta-analysis suggests that SLDH is increased in potentially malignant disorders compared to healthy controls. The results of this metanalysis should encourage use of SLDH as a biomarker in diagnosis of PMDs.
Topics: Biomarkers, Tumor; Early Detection of Cancer; Humans; Lactate Dehydrogenases; Mouth Neoplasms; Oral Submucous Fibrosis
PubMed: 36037107
DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.8.2553