-
Seizure Nov 2015Our goal was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the use of intravenous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) for non-eclamptic status epilepticus (SE) and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Our goal was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the use of intravenous magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) for non-eclamptic status epilepticus (SE) and refractory status epilepticus (RSE).
METHODS
Articles from MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, clinicaltrials.gov (inception to June 2015), reference lists of relevant articles, and gray literature were searched. The strength of evidence was adjudicated using both the Oxford and GRADE methodology by two independent reviewers.
RESULTS
We identified 19 original articles. A total of 28 patients were described in these articles with 11 being adult, 9 being pediatric, and 8 of unknown age. Seizure reduction/control with IV MgSO4 occurred in 14 of the 28 patients (50.0%), with 2 (7.1%) and 12 (42.9%) displaying partial and complete responses respectively. Seizures recurred upon withdrawal of MgSO4 therapy in 50% of the patients whom had reduction/control of their SE/RSE. Three patients had recorded adverse events related to MgSO4 therapy.
CONCLUSIONS
Oxford level 4, GRADE D evidence exists to suggest a trend towards improved seizure control with the use of intravenous MgSO4 for non-eclamptic RSE. Routine use of IV MgSO4 in non-eclamptic SE/RSE cannot be recommended at this time. Further prospective study of this drug is required in order to determine its efficacy as an anti-epileptic in this setting.
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Anticonvulsants; Humans; Magnesium Sulfate; Status Epilepticus
PubMed: 26552572
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.09.017 -
Headache Nov 2019Non-traumatic headaches comprise up to 4% of all emergency department (ED) visits. Current practice is moving toward multimodal analgesia regimens that limit narcotic...
INTRODUCTION
Non-traumatic headaches comprise up to 4% of all emergency department (ED) visits. Current practice is moving toward multimodal analgesia regimens that limit narcotic use.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this systematic review is to address the following research question: In patients with non-traumatic headaches (Population), does administration of intravenous magnesium sulfate (Intervention) compared to placebo, corticosteroids, dopamine antagonists, ergot alkaloids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), triptans, or usual care result in better pain control, lower rate of recurrence at 24 hours, lower requirements for rescue analgesia, and less adverse medication effects (Outcomes)?
METHODS
Scholarly databases and relevant bibliographies were searched, as were clinical trial registries and relevant conference proceedings to limit publication bias. Studies were not limited by date, language, or publication status. Inclusion criteria were: (1) randomized clinical trial (RCT), (2) patients age ≥18 years, (3) non-traumatic headache, (4) patients treated in ED or an outpatient acute care treatment center, and (5) magnesium sulfate administered intravenously (IV). Eligible comparison groups included: placebo, conventional therapy, dopamine antagonist, NSAID, corticosteroid, ergot alkaloid, or triptans.
RESULTS
Out of 4018 identified references, 7 RCTs (545 participants) that treated migraine headaches (n = 6) and benign non-traumatic headaches (n = 1) met inclusion criteria. Pain intensity was improved with magnesium sulfate vs comparators at 60-120 minutes, but not at earlier time points. Result for the endpoint of pain reduction by 50% were conflicting as 3 studies reported that headache was improved, unchanged, and less with magnesium sulfate. Complete pain relief was improved with magnesium sulfate in 1 study, and in the migraine with aura (MA) subgroup in another. The need for rescue analgesia at any point was improved with magnesium sulfate in 1 study, and in the MA subgroup in another. Twenty-four-hour headache recurrence was improved with magnesium sulfate in 1 study, but unchanged in a second. The intended meta-analysis was not performed due to the clinical heterogeneity among studies.
CONCLUSION
While we cannot draw a firm conclusion on the efficacy or benefit of intravenous magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute non-traumatic headaches, the existing evidence indicates potential benefits in pain control beyond 1 hour, aura duration, and need for rescue analgesia.
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Emergency Service, Hospital; Headache; Humans; Magnesium Sulfate; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 31566727
DOI: 10.1111/head.13648 -
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth Apr 2024Some studies have compared the efficacy of nifedipine with that of other tocolytic drugs in the treatment of preterm labor, but the reported results are conflicting. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Some studies have compared the efficacy of nifedipine with that of other tocolytic drugs in the treatment of preterm labor, but the reported results are conflicting.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy of nifedipine with that of ritodrine, nitroglycerine and magnesium sulfate for the management of preterm labor.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Clarivate Analytics Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched until April 3,2024 using predefined keywords. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical trials that compared the efficacy of nifedipine with that of ritodrine, nitroglycerine and magnesium sulfate for the management of preterm labor were included. Two authors independently reviewed the articles, assessed their quality and extracted the data. The quality of the included RCTs based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 1 for clinical trial studies. The risk difference (RD) with the associated 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. A forest plot diagram was used to show the comparative point estimates of nifedipine and other tocolytic drugs on the prevention of preterm labor and their associated 95% confidence intervals based on the duration of pregnancy prolongation. Study heterogeneity was evaluated by the I index, and publication bias was evaluated by Egger's test.
RESULTS
Forty studies enrolling 4336 women were included. According to our meta-analysis, there was a significant difference in the prolongation of preterm labor within the first 48 h between the nifedipine group and the nitroglycerine group (RD, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.00; I: 32.3%). Additionally, there were significant differences between nifedipine and ritodrine (RD, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.21; I, 51.2%) for more than one week RD, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.19; I, 33.2%) and for 34 weeks and more. The difference between nifedipine and magnesium sulfate was not significant in any of the four time points.
CONCLUSIONS
Considering the superiority of nifedipine over ritodrine and nitroglycerine and its similar efficacy to magnesium sulfate for tocolysis, it seems that the side effects of these options determine the first drug line.
Topics: Humans; Nifedipine; Female; Pregnancy; Obstetric Labor, Premature; Magnesium Sulfate; Ritodrine; Tocolytic Agents; Nitroglycerin; Treatment Outcome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38664622
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06497-w -
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology... 2024Prior research has established the effectiveness of magnesium in relieving postoperative pain. This article aims to evaluate magnesium sulfate for perioperative... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Prior research has established the effectiveness of magnesium in relieving postoperative pain. This article aims to evaluate magnesium sulfate for perioperative analgesia in adults undergoing general abdominal surgery under general anesthesia.
OBJECTIVE
The primary aim was to assess pain scores at 6 and 24 hours postoperatively in patients receiving magnesium sulfate vs. the control group. Secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption, perioperative complications, and time to rescue analgesia.
METHODS
A comprehensive database search identified studies comparing magnesium sulfate with control in adults undergoing general anesthesia for general abdominal surgery. Using random-effects models, data were presented as mean ± Standard Deviation (SD) or Odds Ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI). A two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
In total, 31 studies involving 1762 participants met the inclusion criteria. The magnesium group showed significantly lower postoperative pain scores at both early (within six hours) and late (up to 24 hours) time points compared to the control group. The early mean score was 3.1 ± 1.4 vs. 4.2 ± 2.3, and the late mean score was 2.3 ± 1.1 vs. 2.7 ± 1.5, resulting in an overall Mean Difference (MD) of -0.72; 95% CI -0.99, -0.44; p < 0.00001. The magnesium group was associated with lower rates of postoperative opioid consumption and shivering and had a longer time to first analgesia administration compared to the saline control group.
CONCLUSION
Magnesium sulfate administration was linked to reduced postoperative pain and opioid consumption following general abdominal surgery.
Topics: Humans; Pain, Postoperative; Magnesium Sulfate; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Abdomen; Analgesics; Anesthesia, General; Analgesics, Opioid; Perioperative Care
PubMed: 38848810
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844524 -
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology... 2023This study evaluated the efficacy of epidurally administered magnesium associated with local anesthetics on postoperative pain control. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
This study evaluated the efficacy of epidurally administered magnesium associated with local anesthetics on postoperative pain control.
METHODS
The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO as CRD42021231910. Literature searches were conducted on Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials comparing epidural administration of magnesium added to local anesthetics for postoperative pain in elective surgical adult patients. Primary outcomes were the time to the first Postoperative (PO) Analgesic Request (TFAR), 24-hour postoperative opioid consumption, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores at the first six and 24 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV), pruritus, and shivering. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE criteria.
RESULTS
Seventeen studies comparing epidural were included. Effect estimates are described as weighted Mean Differences (MD) and 95% Confidence Intervals (95% CI) for the main outcomes: TFAR (MD = 72.4 min; 95% CI = 10.22-134.58 min; p < 0.001; I = 99.8%; GRADE: very low); opioid consumption (MD = -7.2 mg (95% CI = -9.30 - -5.09; p < 0.001; I = 98%; GRADE: very low). VAS pain scores within the first six PO hours (VAS) (MD = -1.01 cm; 95% CI = -1.40-0.64 cm; p < 0.001; I = 88%; GRADE: very low), at 24 hours (MD = -0.56 cm; 95% CI = -1.14-0.01 cm; p = 0.05; I = 97%; GRADE: very low).
CONCLUSIONS
Magnesium sulfate delayed TFAR and decreased 24-hour opioid consumption and early postoperative pain intensity. However, imprecision and inconsistency pervaded meta-analyses, causing very low certainty of effect estimates.
Topics: Humans; Anesthetics, Local; Magnesium Sulfate; Analgesics, Opioid; Magnesium; Pain, Postoperative
PubMed: 36087812
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2022.08.005 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence May 2011Acetylcholinesterase inhibition by organophosphorus pesticides or organophosphate nerve agents can cause acute parasympathetic system dysfunction, muscle weakness,... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Acetylcholinesterase inhibition by organophosphorus pesticides or organophosphate nerve agents can cause acute parasympathetic system dysfunction, muscle weakness, seizures, coma, and respiratory failure. Prognosis depends on the dose and relative toxicity of the specific compound, as well as pharmacokinetic factors.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical question: What are the effects of treatments for acute organophosphorus poisoning? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to April 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 62 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: activated charcoal (single or multiple doses), alpha(2) adrenergic receptor agonists, atropine, benzodiazepines, butyrylcholinesterase replacement therapy, cathartics, extracorporeal clearance, gastric lavage, glycopyrronium bromide (glycopyrrolate), ipecacuanha (ipecac), magnesium sulphate, milk or other home remedy immediately after ingestion, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists, organophosphorus hydrolases, oximes, removing contaminated clothes and washing the poisoned person, and sodium bicarbonate.
Topics: Acute Disease; Atropine; Charcoal; Gastric Lavage; Humans; Organophosphate Poisoning; Pesticides; Poisoning; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate
PubMed: 21575287
DOI: No ID Found -
Frontiers in Neurology 2020There is an important unmet need to improve long term outcomes of encephalopathy for preterm and term infants. Meta-analyses of large controlled trials suggest that...
There is an important unmet need to improve long term outcomes of encephalopathy for preterm and term infants. Meta-analyses of large controlled trials suggest that maternal treatment with magnesium sulfate (MgSO) is associated with a reduced risk of cerebral palsy and gross motor dysfunction after premature birth. However, to date, follow up to school age has found an apparent lack of long-term clinical benefit. Because of this inconsistency, it remains controversial whether MgSO offers sustained neuroprotection. We systematically reviewed preclinical and clinical studies reported from January 1 2010, to January 31 2020 to evaluate the most recent advances and knowledge gaps relating to the efficacy of MgSO for the treatment of perinatal brain injury. The outcomes of MgSO in preterm and term-equivalent animal models of perinatal encephalopathy were highly inconsistent between studies. None of the perinatal rodent studies that suggested benefit directly controlled body or brain temperature. The majority of the studies did not control for sex, study long term histological and functional outcomes or use pragmatic treatment regimens and many did not report controlling for potential study bias. Finally, most of the recent preterm or term human studies that tested the potential of MgSO for perinatal neuroprotection were relatively underpowered, but nevertheless, suggest that any improvements in neurodevelopment were at best modest or absent. On balance, these data suggest that further rigorous testing in translational preclinical models of perinatal encephalopathy is essential to ensure safety and best regimens for optimal preterm neuroprotection, and before further clinical trials of MgSO for perinatal encephalopathy at term are undertaken.
PubMed: 32536903
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00449 -
BMJ Clinical Evidence Jan 2010About 10% of adults have suffered an attack of asthma, and up to 5% of these have severe disease that responds poorly to treatment. Patients with severe disease have an... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
About 10% of adults have suffered an attack of asthma, and up to 5% of these have severe disease that responds poorly to treatment. Patients with severe disease have an increased risk of death, but patients with mild-to-moderate disease are also at risk of exacerbations. Most guidelines about the management of asthma follow stepwise protocols. This review does not endorse or follow any particular protocol, but presents the evidence about specific interventions.
METHODS AND OUTCOMES
We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments for chronic asthma? What are the effects of treatments for acute asthma? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to June 2008 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA).
RESULTS
We found 99 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions.
CONCLUSIONS
In this systematic review, we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions. For acute asthma: beta(2) agonists (plus ipratropium bromide, pressured metered-dose inhalers, short-acting continuous nebulised, short-acting intermittent nebulised, and short-acting intravenous); corticosteroids (inhaled); corticosteroids (single oral, combined inhaled, and short courses); education about acute asthma; generalist care; helium-oxygen mixture (heliox); magnesium sulphate (intravenous and adding isotonic nebulised magnesium to inhaled beta(2) agonists); mechanical ventilation; oxygen supplementation (controlled 28% oxygen and controlled 100% oxygen); and specialist care. For chronic asthma: beta(2) agonists (adding long-acting inhaled beta(2) agonists when asthma is poorly controlled by inhaled corticosteroids, or short-acting inhaled beta(2) agonists as needed for symptom relief); inhaled corticosteroids (low dose and increasing dose); leukotriene antagonists (with or without inhaled corticosteroids); and theophylline (when poorly controlled by inhaled corticosteroids).
Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Inhalation; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Adult; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Humans; Leukotriene Antagonists; Theophylline
PubMed: 21718577
DOI: No ID Found -
Obstetrics and Gynecology Jun 2024To systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of magnesium sulfate as a fetal neuroprotective agent when given to individuals at risk of preterm...
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of magnesium sulfate as a fetal neuroprotective agent when given to individuals at risk of preterm birth.
DATA SOURCES
We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (through March 17, 2023), and reference lists of relevant studies.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing magnesium sulfate for fetal neuroprotection in pregnant participants at risk of imminent preterm birth were eligible. Two authors assessed RCTs for inclusion, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias, trustworthiness, and evidence certainty (GRADE [Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation]).
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS
We included six RCTs (5,917 pregnant participants and 6,759 fetuses at less than 34 weeks of gestation at randomization). They were conducted in high-income countries (two in the United States, two across Australia and New Zealand, and one each in Denmark and France) and commenced between 1995 and 2018. Primary outcomes: up to 2 years of corrected age, magnesium sulfate compared with placebo reduced the risk of cerebral palsy (risk ratio [RR] 0.71, 95% CI, 0.57-0.89; six RCTs, 6,107 children) and death or cerebral palsy (RR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.77-0.98; six RCTs, 6,481 children) (high-certainty evidence). Magnesium sulfate had little or no effect on death up to 2 years of corrected age (moderate-certainty evidence) or these outcomes at school age (low-certainty evidence). Although there was little or no effect on death or cardiac or respiratory arrest for pregnant individuals (low-certainty evidence), magnesium sulfate increased adverse effects severe enough to stop treatment (RR 3.21, 95% CI, 1.88-5.48; three RCTs, 4,736 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Secondary outcome: magnesium sulfate reduced the risk of severe neonatal intraventricular hemorrhage (moderate-certainty evidence).
CONCLUSION
Magnesium sulfate for preterm fetal neuroprotection reduces cerebral palsy and death or cerebral palsy for children. Further research is required on longer-term benefits and harms for children, effect variation by participant and treatment characteristics, and the generalizability of findings to low- and middle-income countries.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
The review protocol was based on a standard Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth template and our previous Cochrane Systematic Review (doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004661.pub3; published before the introduction of PROSPERO).
PubMed: 38830233
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005644 -
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Mar 2015The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute traumatic brain injury. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the effect of magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute traumatic brain injury.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic search of ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Library database, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the World Health Organization trial registry, plus manual searches of gray literature, was undertaken in April 2013. Two reviewers independently extracted the data with a predefined data extraction form. RevMan 5 software was used to synthesize data and calculate the risk ratio for mortality with the 95% confidence interval. For the Glasgow Outcome Scale and posttreatment Glasgow Coma Scale data, the weighted mean difference was calculated with the 95% confidence interval.
RESULTS
A total of 8 randomized controlled trials with a total of 786 patients were included. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the groups for mortality. The Glasgow Outcome Scale of the treatment group was higher than that of the control group, although the significance was borderline. The Glasgow Coma Scale score change posttreatment was significantly higher than that of the control.
CONCLUSIONS
The present meta-analysis of existing randomized controlled trials does not identify a significant beneficial effect in the mortality of traumatic brain injury patients; however, it suggests that magnesium sulfate shows a tendency to improve the Glasgow Outcome Scale and Glasgow Coma Scale scores, which is a promising result for traumatic brain injury therapy. Further effort is necessary to explore which subgroup of traumatic brain injury patients could benefit from magnesium sulfate.
Topics: Brain Injuries; Cause of Death; Glasgow Coma Scale; Glasgow Outcome Scale; Humans; Magnesium Sulfate; Neuroprotective Agents; Survival Rate
PubMed: 25723660
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001339