-
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &... Nov 2022Because of improved aesthetic results, immediate breast reconstruction has become the most widely used timing of reconstruction following mastectomy. Many studies report... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Because of improved aesthetic results, immediate breast reconstruction has become the most widely used timing of reconstruction following mastectomy. Many studies report complication rates between immediate and delayed reconstructions at certain medical institutions, but no systematic reviews exist to summarize the literature. This systematic review was conducted to assess the outcomes in women who underwent immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer.
METHODS
Cochrane, PubMed, and EMBASE electronic databases were screened, and data were extracted from included studies. The clinical outcomes assessed were surgical complications, length of postoperative hospital stay, and reoperation rate.
RESULTS
A total of 30 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review and provided enough data to be included in the meta-analysis (14,034 patients). Women receiving immediate breast reconstruction were significantly more likely to experience surgical complications (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03, 1.65; p = 0.03). Sensitivity analysis showed that women receiving immediate reconstruction were also more likely to experience infection (OR 1.41, 95% 1.04, 1.92; p = 0.03) and hematoma/seroma (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.27-3.17; p = 0.003). Furthermore, a separate sensitivity analysis showed no significant differences in reported outcomes when comparing studies whose patient cohorts received post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT).
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides evidence that immediate breast reconstruction generally increases the risk of complications in comparison with delayed reconstruction. Additional prospective and observational studies are needed to determine the role of PMRT and reconstruction surgical technique in the incidence of complications between immediate and delayed reconstructions.
Topics: Humans; Female; Mastectomy; Breast Neoplasms; Prospective Studies; Mammaplasty; Seroma; Postoperative Complications; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 36202732
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.08.029 -
Breast Cancer (Tokyo, Japan) Jul 2020The present review evaluated health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) outcomes in surgical breast cancer survivors who received breast reconstruction (BR),... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Health-related quality of life following breast reconstruction compared to total mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery among breast cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The present review evaluated health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) outcomes in surgical breast cancer survivors who received breast reconstruction (BR), breast-conservation surgery (BCS) or mastectomy (M), and whether HR-QoL domains across generic and disease/surgery-specific questionnaires are compatible. Six electronic databases were searched for appropriate observational studies. Standardized scores for different HR-QoL domains in the BR, BCS, and M treatment groups were extracted from each study for the purpose of a meta-analysis. Using Stata version 14.0, a random-effects meta-analysis model was adopted for each outcome variable to estimate the effect size, 95% CI-confidence intervals, and statistical significance. Sixteen of the 18 eligible studies with BR (n = 1474) and BCS (n = 2612) or M (n = 1458) groups were included in the meta-analysis. The BR group exhibited a better physical health (k = 12; 0.1, 95% CI 0.04, 0.24) and body image (k = 12; 0.50, 95% CI 0.10, 0.89) than the M group. However, the two groups exhibited comparable social health (k = 13; 0.1, 95% CI -0.07, 0.37), emotional health (k = 13; -0.08, 95% CI - 0.41, 0.25), global health (k = 7; 0.1, 95% CI - 0.01, 0.27), and sexual health (k =11; 0.2, 95% CI - 0.02,0.57). There was no clear evidence of the superiority of BR to BCS for all the six domains. These results suggest that HR-QoL outcomes in BR and BCS groups are better than the M group. Therefore, women opting for BR or BCS are likely to report fairly better HR-QoL outcomes than M. However, due to the significant heterogeneity observed in most BR versus BCS outcomes, developing a unified questionnaire incorporating both breast/surgery-specific and generic HR-QoL domains is warranted.
Topics: Body Image; Breast; Breast Neoplasms; Cancer Survivors; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy, Segmental; Mastectomy, Simple; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires
PubMed: 32162181
DOI: 10.1007/s12282-020-01076-1 -
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Dec 2023Reduction mammaplasty (RM) has become established as the standard effective method for treating macromastia, but reports on the risk factors that predispose to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Reduction mammaplasty (RM) has become established as the standard effective method for treating macromastia, but reports on the risk factors that predispose to postoperative complications have been conflicting. This meta-analysis aimed to pool the available data to identify predictors of complications following RM.
METHODS
The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases were screened from inception to 1 Jan 2022, and studies were included based on predefined criteria. The perioperative risk factors BMI, smoking, age, diabetes, radiation therapy, and tissue resection weight were extracted and their correlation with complications assessed.
RESULTS
A total of 40 studies comprising of 5908 patients were included. BMI ≥ 30kg/m (OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.35-2.02; p < 0.01) and ≥ 40 kg/m (OR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.26-3.08; p < 0.01), smoking (OR = 2.57, 95% CI 2.01-3.28; p < 0.01), diabetes (OR = 2.21, 95% CI 1.19-4.07; p < 0.05), a unilateral resection weight ≥ 1000 g (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.02-3.05; p < 0.05), and radiation therapy (OR = 11.11, 95% CI 2.01-3.28; p < 0.01) were associated with higher rates of postoperative complications. Obese patients (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m) were more likely to experience fat necrosis (OR = 3.00, 95% CI 1.37-6.57; p < 0.01) and infection (OR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.15-2.40; p < 0.05). Smokers had a 2.03 times higher risk of infection (95% CI 1.24-3.31; p < 0.01) and 2.34 times higher risk of dehiscence (95% CI 1.38-3.98; p < 0.01). No association between complication occurrence and age 40 or 50 years or total tissue resection weight ≥ 1000 g was identified.
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis provides evidence that obesity, smoking, diabetes, unilateral resection weight ≥ 1000 g, and preoperative radiation therapy predispose to complication occurrence in RM. This information can optimize the ability of surgeons to provide preoperative patient education, perioperative assessment, and postoperative care planning.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Topics: Female; Humans; Adult; Mammaplasty; Breast; Risk Factors; Postoperative Complications; Obesity; Diabetes Mellitus; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37253843
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03387-y -
JPRAS Open Dec 2022Mastopexy and reduction mammaplasty are commonly performed procedures in plastic surgery with many variations in incision pattern, pedicle design, and additional support... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Mastopexy and reduction mammaplasty are commonly performed procedures in plastic surgery with many variations in incision pattern, pedicle design, and additional support maneuvers. Aesthetically pleasing on table results are widely accomplished; however, the longevity of the outcome and sustained correction of ptosis or pseudoptosis is not universal. A systematic review of mastopexy and reduction mammaplasty procedures was performed to investigate which techniques provided the greatest long-term correction of ptosis.
METHODS
A broad search of the literature was performed using the PubMed database from inception to December of 2021. Study characteristics, number of patients, number of breasts, technique, outcome, and average follow-up time were extracted for analysis. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale when applicable.
RESULTS
The primary search yielded 1123 articles. After two levels of screening, 24 articles were identified for analysis. This included 16 case series, seven cohort studies, and one randomized controlled study. From these studies, 1235 patients and 2235 breasts were analyzed. The majority of articles reported on a change in the nipple to inframammary fold and sternal notch to nipple distances.
CONCLUSIONS
In the analytical studies, superior and superomedial pedicles tended to provide greater long-term stability than inferior pedicles. Mesh, dermal suspension flaps, and muscular slings showed promise in providing additional support over standard techniques. No single procedure is ideal for all patients; however, this systematic review provides a valuable description of techniques and long-term outcomes to guide surgical planning.
PubMed: 36061406
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2022.05.003 -
Supportive Care in Cancer : Official... Jul 2022The use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and mesh reopened the possibility for the prepectoral single-stage breast reconstruction (PBR). The complications of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The use of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and mesh reopened the possibility for the prepectoral single-stage breast reconstruction (PBR). The complications of single-stage breast reconstruction after PRB are controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of implant plane on single-stage breast reconstruction. Our aim was to evaluate the different postoperative complications between patients receiving prepectoral breast reconstruction and subpectoral breast reconstruction (SBR) on single-stage breast reconstruction.
METHODS
A comprehensive research on databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane libraries was performed to retrieve literature evaluating the effect of implant plane on single-stage breast reconstruction from 2010 to 2020. All included studies were evaluated the complications after single-stage breast reconstruction. Only studies comparing patients who underwent prepectoral reconstruction with a control group who underwent subpectoral reconstruction were included.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 1724 patients. In general, compared with SBR group, the PBR significantly reduced the risk of total complications (including seroma, hematoma, necrosis, wound dehiscence, infection, capsular contraction, implant loss/remove, and rippling) after single-stage breast reconstruction (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.44-0.67, p < 0.001). Compared with the SBR group, the PBR had remarkably decreased capsular contracture (OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.27-0.58, p < 0.001) and postoperative infection (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.36-0.95, p = 0.03).
CONCLUSION
The PBR is a safe single-stage breast reconstruction with fewer postoperative complications. It is an alternative surgical method for SBR.
Topics: Breast Implantation; Breast Implants; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35182228
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06919-5 -
Aesthetic Surgery Journal Mar 2020Reduction mammaplasty remains critical to the treatment of breast hypertrophy. No technique has been shown to be superior; however, comparison between studies is...
BACKGROUND
Reduction mammaplasty remains critical to the treatment of breast hypertrophy. No technique has been shown to be superior; however, comparison between studies is difficult due to variation in outcome reporting.
OBJECTIVES
The authors sought to identify a comprehensive list of outcomes and outcome measures in reduction mammaplasty.
METHODS
A comprehensive computerized search was performed. Included studies were randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials involving at least 100 cases of female breast hypertrophy and patients of all ages who underwent 1 or more defined reduction mammaplasty technique. Outcomes and outcome measures were extracted and tabulated.
RESULTS
A total 106 articles were eligible for inclusion; 57 unique outcomes and 16 outcome measures were identified. Frequency of patient-reported and author-reported outcomes were 44% and 88%, respectively. Postoperative complications were the most frequently reported outcome (82.2%). Quality-of-life outcomes were accounted for in 37.7% of studies. Outcome measures were either condition-specific or generic; frequencies were as low as 1% and as high as 5.6%. Five scales were formally assessed in the breast reduction populations. Clinical measures were defined in 15.1% of studies.
CONCLUSIONS
There is marked heterogeneity in reporting of outcomes and outcome measures in the literature. A standardized outcome set is needed to compare outcomes of various reduction mammaplasty techniques.
Topics: Breast; Female; Humans; Hypertrophy; Mammaplasty; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Quality of Life
PubMed: 31679031
DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjz308 -
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Dec 2016Autologous fat grafting (AFG) or lipofilling is nowadays a popular technique for breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery. There is debate regarding the... (Review)
Review
Autologous fat grafting (AFG) or lipofilling is nowadays a popular technique for breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery. There is debate regarding the oncological safety and risks of this procedure in breast cancer patients. A systematic review of the literature published between January first 1995 and October first 2016 was conducted regarding the efficacy, safety and complications of this technique in breast cancer patients after their cancer treatment. The databases PubMed, Science Direct and Thomson Reuters Web of Science were used to search for qualified articles. Inclusion criteria were women with a personal history of breast cancer and at least one lipofilling procedure. Only studies containing a minimum of 20 patients were included in this systematic review. The search yielded a total of 23 suitable articles: 18 case series, 4 retrospective cohort studies and one prospective cohort study. The systematic review encompassed a total of 2419 patients. Medical imaging was used in the majority of the studies to assess the follow-up. Mammography was the most popular technique (65.2%), followed by ultrasound (47.8%) and MRI (30.4%). The prevalence of complications was the following: fat necrosis in 5.31%, benign lesions, like cysts or calcifications in 8.78%, infections in 0.96% and local cancer recurrence in 1.69%. AFG or lipofilling appears to be an oncological safe technique with a low morbidity in women with a history of breast cancer. In order to have a better understanding and evidence of the oncological safety a randomised controlled trial is urgently needed. We further recommend that all AFG be registered in the cancer register.
Topics: Adipose Tissue; Adult; Breast Cyst; Breast Neoplasms; Calcinosis; Evidence-Based Medicine; Fat Necrosis; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Organ Sparing Treatments; Postoperative Complications; Prevalence; Surgical Wound Infection; Transplantation, Autologous
PubMed: 27835828
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.032 -
Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand... Oct 2017Most women who have their breast reconstructed are offered NAC reconstruction. Nonetheless, it is unclear what scientific evidence there is for the procedure. The aims... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Most women who have their breast reconstructed are offered NAC reconstruction. Nonetheless, it is unclear what scientific evidence there is for the procedure. The aims of the present systematic review were to evaluate the quality of evidence for benefits and risks with NAC reconstruction, and to examine the evidence for different techniques.
METHODS
Relevant databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were controlled studies comprising ≥20 patients and a case series of ≥50 patients. Included articles had to meet criteria defined in a PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome). Data extraction and collection were performed according to the QUADAS tool. The level of evidence of the selected articles was assessed according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2009 guidelines, and total evidence for the different research questions was graded according to the GRADE-system.
RESULTS
A total of 362 abstracts were retrieved following the search. Of these 325 did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded, leaving 37 studies to be included in the review. Among these, 36 were case series and one a small randomised non-blinded study Conclusions: The existing quality of evidence for risks and benefits of the operation is very low. It is unclear what the complication frequencies are after the reconstruction, and what effect on quality-of-life the operation has. Prospective studies of high quality are needed to evaluate the health effects and risks with NAC reconstruction.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Esthetics; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy; Nipples; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27885878
DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2016.1251935 -
Annals of Plastic Surgery Jul 2022Improving patient care and safety requires high-quality evidence. The objective of this study was to systematically review the existing evidence for patient safety (PS)...
BACKGROUND
Improving patient care and safety requires high-quality evidence. The objective of this study was to systematically review the existing evidence for patient safety (PS) and quality improvement initiatives in breast reconstruction.
METHODS
A systematic review of the published plastic surgery literature was undertaken using a computerized search and following PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Publication descriptors, methodological details, and results were extracted. Articles were assessed for methodological quality and clinical heterogeneity. Descriptive statistics were completed, and a meta-analysis was considered.
RESULTS
Forty-six studies were included. Most studies were retrospective (52.2%) and from the third level of evidence (60.9%). Overall, the scientific quality was moderate, with randomized controlled trials generally being higher quality. Studies investigating approaches to reduce seroma (28.3% of included articles) suggested a potential benefit of quilting sutures. Studies focusing on infection (26.1%) demonstrated potential benefits to prophylactic antibiotics and drain use under 21 days. Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols (10.9%) overall did not compromise PS and was beneficial in reducing opioid use and length of stay. Interventions to increase flap survival (10.9%) demonstrated a potential benefit of nitroglycerin on mastectomy skin flaps.
CONCLUSIONS
Overall, studies were of moderate quality and investigated several worthwhile interventions. More validated, standardized outcome measures are required, and studies focusing on interventions to reduce thromboembolic events and bleeding risk could further improve PS.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Mammaplasty; Mastectomy; Patient Safety; Quality Improvement; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35749815
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003062 -
European Spine Journal : Official... Mar 2020There is anecdotal evidence that many patients who undergo reduction mammoplasty (RM) procedures, to relieve symptoms of large breasts, also report improvement in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
There is anecdotal evidence that many patients who undergo reduction mammoplasty (RM) procedures, to relieve symptoms of large breasts, also report improvement in existing back pain. Given how important back pain is as a healthcare burden, the literature which explores the relationship between RM and back pain is sparse. Thus, we aimed to appraise whether such a correlation exists, through systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHOD
Adhering to PRISMA methodology, we used the OVID engine to search the MEDLINE and Embase databases with predefined search terms and inclusion criteria. MeSH terms were not exploded. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3, employing a Mantell-Haenszel method and a fixed-effect model suitable for dichotomous data.
RESULTS
The review yielded 13 articles after exclusions, eight of which were suitable for quantitative analysis. The results of the analysis suggested an improvement in back pain following RM across all studies (OR 40.37 [8.09, 201.53] 95% CI, n = 1008). Heterogeneity was high (τ = 5.14, χ = 230.37, df = 7 (p < 0.00001) i = 97%).
CONCLUSIONS
Although cursory, the evidence gleaned suggests that RM reduces the prevalence of back pain in patients with large breasts. Furthermore, we highlight the scarcity of studies investigating whether RM is at the clinical threshold of efficacy in treating back pain. Although the evidence is insufficient for recommending RM as a management option aimed at treating back pain, this review does identify the need for prospective data looking at back pain metrics as a specific outcome measure before and after reduction mammoplasty.
Topics: Back Pain; Female; Humans; Hypertrophy; Low Back Pain; Mammaplasty; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 31606817
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-019-06155-2