-
International Journal of Oral and... Oct 2017Since the introduction of rigid internal fixation devices, more and more surgeons favour an open approach to treating condylar fractures of the mandible in adult... (Review)
Review
Since the introduction of rigid internal fixation devices, more and more surgeons favour an open approach to treating condylar fractures of the mandible in adult patients. Different indications for open treatment have been published. Open treatment is associated with surgical complications because of the technique employed. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an overview of the studies published exclusively on open treatment, and to summarize the existing open treatment modalities and their clinical outcomes. A total of seventy studies were selected for detailed analysis. Most studies reported good results with regard to the outcome measures of open treatment. Surgical complications including hematoma, wound infection, weakness of the facial nerve, sialocele, salivary fistula, sensory disturbance of the great auricular nerve, unsatisfactory scarring, and fixation failure were reported in the studies. This review suggests that because of the high level of methodological variance in the relevant studies published to date, among other factors, there are currently no evidence-based conclusions or guidelines that can be formulated with regard to the most appropriate open treatment. Establishment of such standards could potentially improve treatment outcomes.
Topics: Adult; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Humans; Jaw Fixation Techniques; Mandibular Condyle; Mandibular Fractures; Mandibular Reconstruction
PubMed: 28732561
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.06.018 -
International Journal of Oral and... Apr 2017Of all mandibular fractures, 25-35% are condylar. Many studies have focused on whether to treat such fractures via open or closed modalities. A uniform protocol for... (Review)
Review
Of all mandibular fractures, 25-35% are condylar. Many studies have focused on whether to treat such fractures via open or closed modalities. A uniform protocol for closed treatment is lacking, but such a protocol could ensure good clinical practice. The aims of this systematic review were to provide an overview of the published studies exclusively pertaining to closed treatment and to summarize the existing modalities for closed treatment and their clinical outcomes. Sixteen studies were selected for detailed analysis. The treatments given were highly variable, ranging from doing nothing to applying maxillomandibular fixation with stainless steel wires. The results of the different studies and the treatment modalities used were difficult to interpret; however no clear differences in the outcome measures were seen between the treatment modalities applied. Complications encountered after closed treatment included malocclusion, limited mouth opening, reduced range of motion, and persistent pain. Due to the heterogeneity between groups, high loss-to-follow-up, poor descriptions of the treatments given, and variability in outcome measurement methods, no clear associations between adverse outcomes and the treatments applied could be determined. This review suggests that due to the high level of methodological variability in the relevant studies published to date, there are currently no uniform standards for the closed treatment of condylar fractures that can be expected to yield good clinical results. The establishment of such standards could potentially improve treatment outcomes.
Topics: Bone Wires; Conservative Treatment; Fracture Fixation; Humans; Jaw Fixation Techniques; Mandibular Condyle; Mandibular Fractures
PubMed: 27955799
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.11.009 -
Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Research 2023This systematic review searched three of the most used databases to assess if current evidence suggested a difference between surgical and non-surgical management of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review searched three of the most used databases to assess if current evidence suggested a difference between surgical and non-surgical management of mandibular condyle fractures in paediatric patients.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
An electronic literature search was conducted of three well known databases - Ovid, PubMed and Web of Science. Studies included were conducted paediatric patients, in humans, written in English and published from January 1 1996 until April 1 2022. Data collection was carried out by two independent reviewers. Data collated from studies without high risk of bias was pooled for surgical vs non-surgical management and total tallies of all outcomes presented. Presence or absence of complications was recorded in 4 x 4 tables for each outcome and compared using a Chi-Square test.
RESULTS
After duplicate records were removed, 182 records were screened. After exclusion of unsuitable reports, 20 were included in the review. Further analysis showed the included studies had high risk of bias. Given this, comparison of this pooled data showed no significant difference between management methods.
CONCLUSIONS
Presently it appears conservative management is functionally adequate without risks associated with surgical management, even though incidence of these risks was shown to be low in the studies included in this review.
PubMed: 37521323
DOI: 10.5037/jomr.2023.14202 -
The British Journal of Oral &... Dec 2023The choices for managing a condylar head fracture (CHF) of the mandible are either open surgical or closed functional treatments (CFT) and the decision depends on... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The choices for managing a condylar head fracture (CHF) of the mandible are either open surgical or closed functional treatments (CFT) and the decision depends on various factors. The purpose of this systematic review was to ascertain from the available literature whether the open method or CFT yields better outcomes in managing CHF. We have systematically reviewed published articles according to the PRISMA statement. The search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and the Cochrane Library database for comparative studies about both open and closed treatments from inception until April 2023. The outcomes of interest were mouth opening (MO), protrusion, laterotrusion, postoperative pain, and malocclusion. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The review comprised of 326 cases, among which 177 were managed by open methods and 149 were treated by CFT. The incidence of postoperative malocclusion and pain were significantly less in the open group. MO was better in the open treatment group although this was not statistically significant. Protrusion and laterotrusion occurred slightly more in CFT, although these were also statistically not significant. Overall, meta-analysis favoured open methods of managing CHF. Although enough evidence exists for the use of open methods for selected condylar head fractures, CFT still demonstrated favourable outcomes in undisplaced fractures. The selection of a particular treatment method should be individualised on the basis of each particular case considering the risk/benefits. Further high quality randomised trials are needed to establish a therapeutic guideline.
Topics: Humans; Mandibular Condyle; Mandibular Fractures; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Treatment Outcome; Malocclusion
PubMed: 37996317
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2023.10.010 -
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial... Jul 2017Third molars (M3s) have been hypothesized to be associated with the risk of mandibular angle fracture and mandibular condylar fracture. The authors systematically... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Third molars (M3s) have been hypothesized to be associated with the risk of mandibular angle fracture and mandibular condylar fracture. The authors systematically estimated the relative risk (RR) of M3 status for the development of mandibular angle fracture and mandibular condylar fracture through a meta-analysis of cohort studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this systematic review, the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to October 2016. The predictor of risk was the presence or absence of M3s. The primary outcome was the RR of mandibular angle or condylar fracture. A fixed- or a random-effects model was applied to evaluate the pooled risk estimates. Sensitivity analysis also was performed to identify the potential sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by the Begg and Egger tests.
RESULTS
Overall, 13 retrospective cohort studies were included. Of these, 13 reported the association between M3s and mandibular angle fracture, and 5 reported the association with mandibular condylar fracture. Patients with M3s had an increased risk of mandibular angle fractures (RR = 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.15-3.21) but a decreased risk of mandibular condylar fractures (RR = 0.47; 95% CI, 0.25-0.86). Substantial heterogeneity in the risk estimates was found. No evidence of publication bias was found.
CONCLUSION
The present meta-analysis provides further evidence associating the presence of M3s with an increased risk of mandibular angle fractures and a simultaneously decreased risk of mandibular condylar fracture. Because of potentially more serious complications associated with condylar fracture, clinicians should carefully consider the decision to remove M3s to decrease the risk of mandibular angle fracture.
Topics: Cohort Studies; Humans; Mandibular Condyle; Mandibular Fractures; Molar, Third; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 28412268
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.03.021 -
The British Journal of Oral &... May 2021The aims of the present study were to comprehensively assess all the published cases on dislocation of the mandibular condyle into the middle cranial fossa (DMCCF) in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Dislocation of the mandibular condyle into the middle cranial fossa. A case of temporomandibular joint arthroplasty with resorbable fixation system and temporalis myofascial flap: systematic review and meta-analysis.
The aims of the present study were to comprehensively assess all the published cases on dislocation of the mandibular condyle into the middle cranial fossa (DMCCF) in the literature in English and describe the clinical, imaging, and therapeutic variables for this condition. An electronic search was undertaken in March 2020 using PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Springer, and Scopus databases. Eligibility criteria included publications with sufficient information to confirm the diagnosis. In addition, we have presented the case report of a 13-year-old boy with DMCCF, who was treated with craniectomy, arthroplasty, and reconstruction with a resorbable osteosynthesis material obtaining favourable and functional results. A total of 72 cases reported in English, including ours, were analysed and discussed. Most of the patients were female (n= 49) with a mean (range) age of 23.4 (5-72) years, the most affected condyle was the right (n= 42), the main aetiology was a motor vehicle accident, and half of the patients had intracranial lesions. Open treatment was performed in the majority with condylar surgery that included condylotomy and condylectomy. Temporomandibular joint arthroplasty was performed with bone, osteosynthesis material, and flap rotation. Timely treatment before four weeks was performed in most of the cases and, despite this, the persistence of the deviation was observed in more than a third of cases, with functional and neurosensorial sequelae. The present study allows an update of the characteristics of DMCCF and gives a current vision of how to manage this rare and complex fracture.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Arthroplasty; Cranial Fossa, Middle; Female; Humans; Joint Dislocations; Male; Mandibular Condyle; Middle Aged; Temporomandibular Joint; Young Adult
PubMed: 33757662
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.039 -
Animals : An Open Access Journal From... Mar 2021Treating extreme mandibular growth is challenging. The mandible is pushed backwards to address itsprotrusion. Nevertheless, conclusions after such displacement in... (Review)
Review
Treating extreme mandibular growth is challenging. The mandible is pushed backwards to address itsprotrusion. Nevertheless, conclusions after such displacement in animals have been contradictory. The aim of the present review is to present measurable alterations of the mandible and the condyle following retractionin healthy rats or rabbits. PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were accessed for relevant studies up to October 2020. Eligibility was determined by the PICOS process, while the risk of bias was estimated with SYRCLE's risk of bias tool. Retraction resulted in a more distal molar occlusion and the condyle rested more posteriorly. Mandibular anteroposterior bilateral growth restriction was achieved, the condylar process measured smaller and its angulation increased. The condylar neck thickened, its posterior surface flattened, the coronoid process was measured longer, and enlarged retromolar density was registered. Differences in the ramus height and the intercondylar distance were insignificant. Changes persisted for the period of study and subsequently the mandible resumed its inherited growth pattern. The timing of mandibular shaping and TMJ outcomes might depend on the properties of the applied force. Stability is of concern and well-structured, long-term studies are expected to resolve the issue and further clarify the results of posterior mandibular displacement.
PubMed: 33804016
DOI: 10.3390/ani11030823 -
Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral... Apr 2020The aim of this study was to evaluate the mandibular and articular dynamics and the presence of complications associated with surgical or nonsurgical treatments of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Changes in mandibular and articular dynamics associated with surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of mandibular condylar fractures: a systematic review with meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to evaluate the mandibular and articular dynamics and the presence of complications associated with surgical or nonsurgical treatments of condylar fractures.
STUDY DESIGN
Clinical trials that compared open reduction internal fixation and maxillomandibular fixation in patients with condylar fractures were included. We performed an electronic search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences) databases starting from February 2017 and updated in January 2019 and found 467 articles. We evaluated methodologic quality by using the criteria from Cochrane's Collaboration Tool.
RESULTS
After independent screening of abstracts, we assessed the full texts of 88 articles; 9 studies were included for qualitative synthesis; but only 8 were included for the meta-analysis. Four studies were considered to have high risk of bias, and 5 were considered to have low risk. The risk ratio (RR = 0.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.32) was observed for complications. The quality of evidence, using GRADE software, was considered low for maximum mouth opening and protrusive movement and moderate for lateral excursion movement and complications.
CONCLUSIONS
This review suggested that open reduction internal fixation and maxillomandibular fixation are effective. However, surgical treatment presented higher objective parameters. Nonsurgical treatment presented a high index of complications, such as malocclusion, pain and deviation.
Topics: Fracture Fixation, Internal; Humans; Jaw Fixation Techniques; Mandibular Condyle; Mandibular Fractures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32102762
DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2019.10.010 -
International Journal of Oral and... May 2016The objective of this study was to assess the anatomical changes to the condyle and articular disc following mandibular advancement surgery, the adaptation of the... (Review)
Review
The objective of this study was to assess the anatomical changes to the condyle and articular disc following mandibular advancement surgery, the adaptation of the masticatory muscles, and the improvement or worsening of temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in patients with pre-existing disorders and those who developed them following surgery. Four databases were searched systematically: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Of the 544 articles initially selected, 219 were duplicates and a further 165 were excluded on the basis of their titles and abstracts. On reading the full text, 89 were excluded because they were of no interest and 43 because they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Of the remaining 28 articles, six were excluded because they were considered of low quality and 22 articles were reviewed. Mandibular advancement surgery with condyle repositioning is associated with less TMD. Condylar resorption is a physiological process with a multifactorial aetiology. It is accelerated following mandibular advancement surgery but is not a contraindication to this procedure. Despite the large number of studies on the effects of mandibular advancement surgery on the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), this surgery can neither be said to improve nor to worsen TMJ health.
Topics: Adaptation, Physiological; Bone Resorption; Humans; Mandibular Advancement; Mandibular Condyle; Masticatory Muscles; Temporomandibular Joint Disc; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
PubMed: 26644217
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.016 -
International Journal of Oral and... Jan 2022There is no accepted method of reporting mandibular fracture that reflects incidence, treatment and outcome for individual cases. As most series include anatomical site...
There is no accepted method of reporting mandibular fracture that reflects incidence, treatment and outcome for individual cases. As most series include anatomical site only for all fractures, the aim was to establish a new method to report fractures based on a systematic review of the literature and an internal audit. The classification proposed is: Class I; condyle, II; angle, IIc; II+condyle, III; body/symphysis, IIIc; III+condyle, IV; multiple fractures not including condyle, IVc; IV+condyle, V; bilateral condyle±other fracture(s). A total of 10,971 adult and 914 paediatric cases were analyzed through systematic review, and 833 from the regional audit. Only 32% (14/44) of reported series could be reclassified which, when added to the audit data, showed Class IV was most common (29%), with similar proportions of Class III, Class IIIc and Class II (18-23%). External validation (literature review) in terms of treatment and outcome was non-informative, but the internal validation (audit) demonstrated an increasing requirement for adding maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) to open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) as class increased. The heterogeneity of data reporting found in the systematic review confirms the need for a classification such as this, likely to enhance comparison of varying management protocols.
Topics: Adult; Child; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Humans; Incidence; Jaw Fixation Techniques; Mandibular Condyle; Mandibular Fractures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34092451
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.02.012